While music streaming apps like Bandcamp, Spotify and Deezer have taken steps to inform users about AI-generated content, we haven’t heard much out of Apple Music in that regard. However, Apple Music has now introduced “Transparency Tags” designed to show listeners if any elements were generated in whole or part by AI. The catch is that Apple is leaving it up to labels and distributors to create those tags, according to an Apple newsletter to industry partners seen by Music Business Worldwide..

“Proper tagging of content is the first step in giving the music industry the data and tools needed to develop thoughtful policies around AI, and we believe labels and distributors must take an active role in reporting when the content they deliver is created using AI,” Apple wrote, calling it a concrete first step toward transparency around artificial intelligence.

Streaming platforms already use metadata tags for things like song and album titles, genre and the name of the artist. The new tags will now identify any artwork, tracks, compositions and music videos created in whole or in part by AI.

However, Apple’s new system requires labels and distributors to opt in and manually flag their use of AI, a system that’s similar to what Spotify is doing. On top of that, Apple has no apparent enforcement mechanism for AI content.

By contrast, other music platforms including Deezer and Bandcamp are using in-house AI-detection tools to flag content whether the distributor opts in or not. Deezer disclosed in January 2026 that it receives over 60,000 fully AI-generated tracks every day, double the number it saw in September 2025. Synthetic content, also called “AI slop,” has accounted for 13.4 million tracks on its platform, Deezer added.

Google is moving forward with a series of Play Store changes after settling a years-long legal battle with Fortnite maker Epic Games over anticompetitive concerns. The tech giant on Wednesday said it will drop its Play Store commissions to 20% on in-app purchases, with another 5% tacked on if app developers choose to use Google’s billing system. It’s also making it easier for users to install alternative app stores through a new optional program called the Registered App Stores program.

“With these updates, we have also resolved our disputes worldwide with Epic Games,” Google said in a company blog post.

The changes are part of a new settlement between the two tech rivals that will allow Epic Games to bring Fortnite back to the Google Play Store globally, while also investing in its own alternative app store, the Epic Games Store for Android.

As part of the agreement, Google’s Registered App Stores program will offer a more streamlined installation flow for users who want to install apps from outside of Google Play. One of Epic’s concerns was that the process for sideloading apps involved scary warnings to users about the danger of non-Play Store apps. Of course, users should be wary — sideloaded apps are a well-known security risk. But some third parties, like Epic Games, wanted to run their own legitimate (and secure) app stores without the scare tactics.

That program will allow this, as approved stores will need to meet certain quality and safety requirements, Google notes. The program is coming to markets beyond the U.S. first. Once the settlement is approved by the court, it will launch stateside as well.

Another notable change is the adjustment to the Play Store commission structure. Like Apple, Google’s default commission has been 30%, with a reduced fee of 15% for recurring subscriptions. Now, it will go even lower: the new “service fee” will be 20% for in-app purchases on new installs and 10% for recurring subscriptions.

However, this fee does not include the use of Google’s own billing system — that’s another 5%. (This rate applies in the U.S., European Economic Area [EEA], and the U.K. Other countries will have their own market-specific rates.)

There will also be new programs for developers, including an Apps Experience Program and a revamped Google Play Games Level Up program, both of which incentivize developers to build quality experiences on Android. Developers who opt to participate in these programs will pay the 20% commission on transactions taking place in their existing app installs, but will pay only a 15% commission on transactions from new app installs.

These new fees will go live by June 30, 2026, in the EEA, U.K., and U.S. The new developer programs will also launch at that time.

Australia will gain access to the new fee structure on September 30, followed by Korea and Japan by December 31. The new fees will expand to the global market by September 30, 2027.

“We believe these changes will make for a stronger Android ecosystem with even more successful developers and higher-quality apps and games available across more form factors for everyone. We look forward to our continued work with the developer community to build the next generation of digital experiences,” Google’s post said.

Epic Games praised the settlement and the resulting changes in its own statement, noting that “These changes will evolve Android into a true open platform with competition among stores.” On X, Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney said “THANKS GOOGLE!” calling the move a “better deal for all developers.”

Epic Games has long been involved in a similar lawsuit with Apple over its App Store commissions. Apple was forced to change its policy to give developers the ability to link to outside payment options. That case is under appeal, with Apple most recently winning a partial reversal of the court’s order.

Apple Music is changing the way that record labels and distributors can flag AI-generated or AI-assisted content when they upload it to the platform.

According to Music Business Worldwide, Apple sent a newsletter to industry partners on Wednesday to explain how it will roll out a new set of metadata to promote transparency around how and when AI is used in music.

Metadata typically refers to fields like the song title, album title, genre, artist name, and other information that helps keep files organized. Now Apple Music will add the option to include metadata tags that distributors can use to flag when AI-generated content is involved in certain aspects of a song. These tags allow distributors to distinguish between a song’s artwork, track (music), composition (lyrics), or music video.

This seems like something that Apple Music users are interested in — a Reddit user posted a mock-up of a similar feature concept just days ago. But the problem with this sort of opt-in tagging is that it’s on the label or distributor to manually choose to flag their use of AI. Spotify is taking a similar path.

Other music-streaming platforms like Deezer are trying to flag content with in-house AI-detection tools, but it remains challenging to create these sorts of systems that are maximally accurate.

TechCrunch has reached out to Apple for more information.

England and India meet in the semi-final of a T20 World Cup for the third time in a row. On the previous two occasions, the winner has gone on to lift the trophy. Neither side has looked like the complete package so far, although England have exceeded pre-tournament expectations.

One Harry Brook century aside, they’ve been all over the place with the bat. The opening stand of Phil Salt and Jos Buttler have averaged just 12, and their route through the World Cup has been punctuated by tight victories. All-rounder Will Jacks, however, has arguably been the player of the tournament.

• Europol leads multinational operation against Tycoon 2FA
• Platform enabled large-scale phishing with MFA bypass
• Authorities dismantled core infrastructure and seized domains

Tycoon 2FA, one of the largest phishing-as-a-service (PhaaS) platforms in the world, has been taken down after a global coordinated law enforcement operation.

The operation was led by Europol, and included police forces from Latvia, Lithuania, Portugal, Poland, Spain, and the United Kingdom.

Anthropic co-founder and CEO Dario Amodei is not happy — perhaps predictably so — with OpenAI chief Sam Altman. In a memo to staff, reported by The Information, Amodei referred to OpenAI’s dealings with the Department of Defense as “safety theater.”

“The main reason [OpenAI] accepted [the DoD’s deal] and we did not is that they cared about placating employees, and we actually cared about preventing abuses,” Amodei wrote.

Last week, Anthropic and the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) failed to come to an agreement over the military’s request for unrestricted access to the AI company’s technology. Anthropic, which already had a $200 million contract with the military, insisted the DoD affirm that it would not use the company’s AI to enable domestic mass surveillance or autonomous weaponry.

Instead, the DoD — known under the Trump administration as the Department of War — struck a deal with OpenAI. Altman stated that his company’s new defense contract would include protections against the same red lines that Anthropic had asserted.

In a letter to staff, Amodei refers to OpenAI’s messaging as “straight up lies,” stating that Altman is falsely “presenting himself as a peacemaker and dealmaker.”

Amodei might not be speaking solely from a position of bitterness, here. Anthropic specifically took issue with the DoD’s insistence on the company’s AI being available for “any lawful use.” OpenAI said in a blog post that its contract allows use of its AI systems for “all lawful purposes.”

“It was clear in our interaction that the DoW considers mass domestic surveillance illegal and was not planning to use it for this purpose,” OpenAI’s blog post stated. “We ensured that the fact that it is not covered under lawful use was made explicit in our contract.”

Critics have pointed out that the law is subject to change, and what is considered illegal now might end up being allowed in the future.

And the public seems to be siding with Anthropic. ChatGPT uninstalls jumped 295% after OpenAI made its deal with the DoD.

“I think this attempted spin/gaslighting is not working very well on the general public or the media, where people mostly see OpenAI’s deal with the DoW as sketchy or suspicious, and see us as the heroes (we’re #2 in the App Store now!),” Amodei wrote to his staff. “It is working on some Twitter morons, which doesn’t matter, but my main worry is how to make sure it doesn’t work on OpenAI employees.”