Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Tech

Photonics research firm Invrs.io & its single employee acquired by Apple

Published

on

A new filing has revealed that Apple purchased Invrs.io, acquiring its assets along with the sole equityholder, founder, and employee.

White virtual reality headset with glossy black visor resting on a cushion, set against a dark background featuring a glowing multicolored abstract loop of neon-like light.
Apple has acquired another AI startup — Invrs.io

Following Apple’s acquisition of the audio-focused startup Q.ai in January 2026, it has been revealed that another, much smaller company has moved under the Apple umbrella.
A notice on the European Commission website, spotted by MacRumors, says that the iPhone maker acquired the photonics research company Invrs.io, LLC back in October 2025. Photonics is the science and technology of generating, controlling, and detecting photons, or light particles.
Continue Reading on AppleInsider | Discuss on our Forums

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

Microsoft flags China-based hackers using vicious new ‘rapid attack’ zero-days to launch ransomware at targets across the world

Published

on


  • Storm-1175 rapidly moves from access to ransomware deployment
  • Exploits zero-days and n-days across multiple products
  • Targets healthcare, finance, education, and professional services

Chinese-speaking hacking collective Storm-1175 is moving fast, going from initial access to full system compromise and data exfiltration in weeks, and sometimes in less than 24 hours, experts have warned.

A new report from Microsoft claims the group was seen leveraging multiple flaws, both zero-days and n-days, in their activities. In some cases, they would even chain various flaws together for better outcomes.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Block introduces Managerbot, a proactive Square AI agent and the clearest proof point yet for Jack Dorsey’s AI bet

Published

on

Block today unveiled Managerbot, a new AI agent embedded in the Square platform that proactively monitors a seller’s business, identifies emerging problems, and proposes actionable solutions — without the seller ever having to ask a question. The product marks the most tangible manifestation of CEO Jack Dorsey’s controversial bet that artificial intelligence can fundamentally reshape how his company operates, builds products, and serves the millions of small businesses that depend on Square to run day-to-day commerce.

In an exclusive interview with VentureBeat, Willem Avé, Block’s head of product at Square, described Managerbot as a decisive break from the company’s earlier Square AI assistant, which functioned as a reactive chatbot that answered seller questions about sales, employees, and business performance.

“The big shift from Square AI to Managerbot is really from reactive to proactive,” Avé said. “What that means is the primary interface is not a question box. You assign tasks to Managerbot, and that could be based on data, an insight, or a signal from your business.”

The product is beginning to roll out now, with full availability to Square sellers expected over the coming months. Block declined to say whether Managerbot would carry an additional fee or be bundled into existing Square subscriptions.

Advertisement

How Managerbot predicts inventory shortages, optimizes schedules, and writes marketing campaigns on its own

Avé outlined three core domains where Managerbot operates today: inventory forecasting, employee shift scheduling, and automated marketing campaign creation. In every case, the agent acts before the seller does — watching over the business, detecting patterns, and surfacing recommendations with proposed actions attached.

In the inventory domain, Managerbot continuously monitors a seller’s stock levels, sales velocity, and external signals such as weather patterns and local events, then alerts the seller when an item is about to run out — or when it should stock up ahead of anticipated demand. “In warmer weather, we can see that you sell more of a certain good,” Avé explained. “That’s the forecasting capability, combined with local data — weather, events — so we can help sellers manage both their inventory and cash flows.”

For shift scheduling — a task that Avé described as “one of those interesting, very hard computer science problems” that consumes hours of a small business owner’s week — Managerbot analyzes forecasted sales data and then generates optimized employee schedules that balance worker preferences with coverage needs. “It turns out that frontier models are actually pretty good at it,” Avé said.

The third capability tackles what Avé called “the whole bucket of things that sellers could do if they had more time” — principally marketing. Managerbot identifies sales trends across a seller’s catalog and automatically drafts win-back campaigns and promotional outreach targeted at a store’s best customer segments. Avé said Block is seeing “very meaningful lift” from Managerbot-generated campaigns compared to what some sellers create manually, though he declined to share specific performance figures publicly.

Advertisement

Block built Managerbot on frontier AI models from OpenAI and Anthropic — but says the real innovation is underneath

Managerbot runs on third-party frontier models — Avé specifically referenced Anthropic’s Sonnet and OpenAI’s GPT family — but Block’s competitive advantage, he argued, lies in the “agent harness” the company has built around those models. That harness draws heavily on Goose, Block’s open-source agent framework, and incorporates learnings from its consumer-facing Money Bot on Cash App.

The challenge specific to Square is scale and complexity. A seller running a small business might interact with hundreds of different tools across invoicing, inventory, customer management, marketing, payroll, and scheduling. Managerbot must navigate all of them coherently within a single agentic loop. “This isn’t like, you know, you load a skill and call it a day — think about hundreds of skills,” Avé said. “Actually, managing the context and managing the way that we progressively disclose tools, and some of the other innovation that we have at the harness layer, is I think some of the secret sauce.”

A critical design decision shapes every interaction: Managerbot does not autonomously execute changes to a seller’s business. Every write action — whether adjusting a shift schedule, publishing a marketing campaign, or modifying inventory — requires explicit seller approval. To facilitate that approval, Managerbot generates visual UI previews showing exactly what will change before the seller clicks “yes.” “We want to earn trust with sellers, so any write action is prompted to the user to approve,” Avé said. “The seller needs a visual representation of what the change is. You can’t just describe in words all the time what you’re going to go do.”

An $80 million fine and chatbot blunders hang over Block’s push to automate financial recommendations

That human-in-the-loop caution reflects a sensitivity that gains additional weight given Block’s recent history. In January 2025, 48 state financial regulators imposed an $80 million fine on Block for violations of Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering laws related to Cash App. The Connecticut Department of Banking stated in announcing the settlement that regulators “found Block was not in compliance with certain requirements, creating the potential that its services could be used to support money laundering, terrorism financing, or other illegal activities.” The Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation simultaneously joined the coordinated enforcement action.

Advertisement

Separately, reporting from The Guardian has documented instances of Block’s customer-facing chatbots making serious errors, including telling customers to cancel or close their accounts. When VentureBeat raised this concern during the interview, Avé acknowledged the stakes but redirected to Managerbot’s specific safeguards.

“Financial accuracy and financial data — the value of these products really come from recommendations,” Avé said. “We need to be better than whatever you can feed to ChatGPT. If you take a CSV of your sales and put it in ChatGPT or Claude, we need our product to be better and answer that question either more accurately or better than what’s available in the market.” He pointed to the harness layer’s role in reducing hallucinations through tuning, prompt engineering, and optimized tool-call loops, while acknowledging the inherent limitations of probabilistic systems: “It’s never going to be zero. Obviously, these are probabilistic systems, and we have guidance and call-outs in the tool to provide that.” On regulated domains like lending and payments, Avé was more definitive: “In any sort of regulated domains — banking, lending, payments — there are strict guardrails on what we can and can’t say to sellers. Those are just part of the product and business.”

Dorsey cut 4,000 jobs in the name of AI — Managerbot is the first answer to what those tools are actually building

It is impossible to evaluate Managerbot outside the context of the radical organizational surgery Block performed just weeks ago. In late February, Dorsey announced that Block would cut more than 4,000 of its roughly 10,000 employees — nearly half the workforce — explicitly citing AI as the driving rationale. As the BBC reported, Dorsey wrote that “AI fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company.” Block’s stock surged more than 20 percent on the news, according to ABC7.

The company’s Q4 2025 earnings report, released alongside the layoff announcement, showed gross profit of $2.87 billion — up 24 percent year over year — and raised 2026 guidance to $12.2 billion in gross profit, according to AlphaSense’s earnings analysis. Block also reported a greater than 40 percent increase in production code shipped per engineer since September 2025 through the use of agentic coding tools. As CNBC commentator Steve Sedgwick wrote in an opinion piece following the announcement, “I keep getting told on CNBC that AI will create new jobs to replace those being lost. I’ve been asking the same question for years now.” The Observer’s Mark Minevich was more pointed, calling Block’s layoffs “probably the first legitimate mass layoff driven by A.I. as the actual operating thesis.”

Advertisement

Managerbot, then, is the product answer to the obvious follow-up question: if Block shed 4,000 workers in the name of intelligence tools, what exactly are those intelligence tools building? Avé framed the product as proof of concept for Block’s entire strategic thesis. “Block has been in the press recently about rebuilding as an intelligence company, and it’s like, a lot of people are asking, ‘What does that mean for us?’” Avé said. “What I like to do is show, not tell. We’re building Managerbot, which I think is one of the more advanced, maybe the most advanced, small business agent out there today.”

Sellers who use Managerbot are consolidating their businesses onto Square — and that may be the real strategic payoff

Perhaps the most consequential signal Avé shared was an early behavioral pattern: sellers who begin using Managerbot are voluntarily migrating more of their business operations onto the Square platform, consolidating payroll, time cards, and shift scheduling into Block’s ecosystem to feed the agent more data. “When they start interacting with Managerbot, they want to move more of their business onto Square because they see the value,” Avé said. “They’re like, ‘I should put my payroll here. I should get time cards here. I should get my shift schedules here,’ because once all that data is in one place, they can make better decisions and manage their business better.”

This dynamic could prove to be Managerbot’s most significant long-term effect — not as a standalone feature, but as a gravitational force pulling sellers deeper into Block’s integrated commerce stack. Block’s Q4 earnings already showed Square’s new volume added grew 29 percent year over year, with sales-led NVA surging 62 percent. Avé also argued that Square’s first-party architecture — built organically rather than through acquisitions — gives it a structural advantage over competitors in the AI era. “We’ve kind of harmonized and canonicalized this data at a sensible layer,” he said. “It’s not super hard to create more skills for these data domains.”

When VentureBeat pressed Avé on the tension between helping sellers and upselling them on Block’s own financial products — lending, payments processing, and other services that generate revenue for the company — he acknowledged the concern but framed Managerbot’s mission in terms of decision-making quality. “The goal for Managerbot is to help sellers increase their decision-making correctness,” Avé said. “If we can make sellers better at running their business by making better decisions and giving time back, I think that’s a good thing.”

Advertisement

Block says Managerbot isn’t a chatbot — it’s a business protector that compounds the company’s entire AI strategy

Avé was insistent that Managerbot represents something categorically different from the chatbot-as-advisor model that has proliferated across enterprise software. “A lot of people are building chatbots as advisors — it can answer a question for you,” he said. “What we really want Managerbot to be is a protector of your business. This is identifying trends. This is spotting things that you might have missed. This is helping you run your business and take actions.”

He also argued that the agent model compounds Block’s development velocity in ways that traditional software cannot match. “It’s much more straightforward to add a capability to Managerbot than it is to build a big Web 2.0 UI,” Avé said. “If we can deliver more capabilities, more features, more value to our sellers, the whole system compounds.”

Whether that compounding materializes — and whether sellers ultimately experience Managerbot as a trusted protector or a sophisticated upsell engine — will determine much about Block’s future. The company has staked its corporate identity, its headcount, and its Wall Street narrative on the conviction that AI agents can deliver more value with fewer humans in the loop. Managerbot is the first product to carry the full weight of that promise. And the small business owners who keep their shops open with Square terminals, who juggle shift schedules on napkins and skip marketing because there aren’t enough hours in the day — they didn’t ask to be the test case for Silicon Valley’s boldest AI thesis. But as of today, they are.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Tech Moves: Microsoft leader jumps to Anthropic; Tagboard gets new CEO; Expedia names tech VP

Published

on

Eric Boyd. (LinkedIn Photo)

— Longtime Microsoft leader Eric Boyd announced today that he has joined Anthropic to lead its infrastructure team.

“I’ve been privileged to have a front row seat to the explosion of LLMs, and the team at Anthropic is truly special,” Boyd said on LinkedIn. “The combination of the absolute leading models with a culture that is committed to their mission is inspiring and I can’t wait to lean in to help.”

Boyd left Microsoft after nearly 17 years, GeekWire reported last week. He originally joined the Redmond, Wash., company as a manager leading BingAds development, then became president of the AI Platform in 2015. A few years later, CEO Satya Nadella tapped him to lead the Azure AI team.

Nathan Peterson. (LinkedIn Photo)

Nathan Peterson is stepping down as CEO of Tagboard, a Redmond, Wash., company that helps sports, news, entertainment and other brands produce live broadcasts. Peterson joined Tagboard in 2017 as senior vice president of revenue and partnerships, ascending the ranks until becoming CEO four years ago. He succeeded founder Josh Decker.

The company called out Peterson’s accomplishments in a LinkedIn post: “Over more than a decade, he built a product category, grew a team of people who care deeply about the craft of live production and forged relationships across sports, news, and entertainment that put Tagboard on the biggest screens in the world.”

Peterson shared his own thoughts on LinkedIn, writing: “Many came and went as we built, added, subtracted, reflected, fought & grinded our asses off to meet the multiple shifts that the media industry has tossed everyone’s way.” He did not indicate his next move, saying he was taking the opportunity “to pursue a lifelong dream.”

Advertisement
Marty Roberts. (LinkedIn Photo)

Marty Roberts will take over as Tagboard‘s CEO, having previously served as the startup’s chief operating officer since 2024. He previously co-founded and led Wicket Labs, a Seattle-area startup that provided audience data to online video providers and was acquired in 2022.

“[Roberts] has founded. He has scaled. He has led teams through the hard work of turning a product vision into a lasting business. That experience is now fully focused on Tagboard and the clients we serve,” the company said on LinkedIn.

Ryan Desjardins. (LinkedIn Photo)

Ryan Desjardins was promoted to vice president of technology at Expedia Group. Dejardins has been with the Seattle travel company for more than 13 years and is based in Austin.

“I’m thankful for my amazing teams who I get to work with every day – your hard work, creativity, and dedication to our travelers make this possible,” Desjardins said on LinkedIn.

Expedia earlier this year highlighted its efforts to build more AI capabilities directly into its products and said it was working to ensure its brands appear prominently in generative AI searches and function effectively with agentic browsers.

Ian Vensel is now general manager for 9Zero Seattle, a hub supporting Pacific Northwest climate tech entrepreneurs. Vensel was previously with Empire Strategists for more than eight years, leaving the role of business development manager.

Advertisement

Walid Abu-Hadba is now CEO of Precisely, a data management company in Burlington, Mass. Earlier in his career, Abu-Hadba spent more than 21 years at Microsoft, leaving in 2013 as corporate VP, where he led the company’s developer business across sales, technical evangelism and marketing.

Puget Sound Emergency Radio Network named Jeremy Hurd as its new executive director, effective April 20. Hurd succeeds Mike Webb, who is retiring from the Kent, Wash., organization. The network is an emergency radio system used for 911 dispatches and other communications by fire departments, law enforcement agencies, emergency medical services and other public service agencies.

Hurd previously served as senior communications and remote sensing manager at Marine Spill Response Corporation, where he had a 21-year tenure.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Today’s NYT Connections: Sports Edition Hints, Answers for April 8 #562

Published

on

Looking for the most recent regular Connections answers? Click here for today’s Connections hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Mini Crossword, Wordle and Strands puzzles.


Today’s Connections: Sports Edition is a tough one. If you’re struggling with today’s puzzle but still want to solve it, read on for hints and the answers.

Connections: Sports Edition is published by The Athletic, the subscription-based sports journalism site owned by The Times. It doesn’t appear in the NYT Games app, but it does in The Athletic’s own app. Or you can play it for free online.

Advertisement

Read more: NYT Connections: Sports Edition Puzzle Comes Out of Beta

Hints for today’s Connections: Sports Edition groups

Here are four hints for the groupings in today’s Connections: Sports Edition puzzle, ranked from the easiest yellow group to the tough (and sometimes bizarre) purple group.

Yellow group hint: Working out.

Advertisement

Green group hint: Cover your face.

Blue group hint: NFL players.

Purple group hint: Leap.

Answers for today’s Connections: Sports Edition groups

Yellow group: Exercises in singular form.

Advertisement

Green group: Sporting jobs that require masks.

Blue group: Hall of Fame defensive ends.

Purple group: ____ jump.

Read more: Wordle Cheat Sheet: Here Are the Most Popular Letters Used in English Words

Advertisement

What are today’s Connections: Sports Edition answers?

completed NYT Connections: Sports Edition puzzle for April 8, 2026

The completed NYT Connections: Sports Edition puzzle for April 8, 2026.

NYT/Screenshot by CNET

The yellow words in today’s Connections

The theme is exercises in singular form. The four answers are crunch, plank, situp and squat.

The green words in today’s Connections

The theme is sporting jobs that require masks. The four answers are catcher, fencer, football player and goaltender.

Advertisement

The blue words in today’s Connections

The theme is Hall of Fame defensive ends. The four answers are Dent, Peppers, Strahan and Youngblood.

The purple words in today’s Connections

The theme is ____ jump. The four answers are broad, high, long and triple.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

How Do The Two Pickup Truck Engines Compare?

Published

on





When you think of a turbodiesel-powered pickup truck, at least one that’s sold in the North American market, the first thing that comes to mind is surely a big, heavy duty truck. It is, after all, in these big Chevy Silverado HDs, Ford Super Dutys, and RAM 2500s and 3500s where their respective Duramax, Power Stroke, and Cummins diesel engines are the most popular.

However, at different times over the last decade, smaller versions of these turbodiesel engines have been offered in smaller, half-ton pickup trucks with varying degrees of success and popularity. For example, while it’s less than half the size of the Silverado HD’s Duramax V8, the Duramax 3.0 inline-six is considered one of the best truck engines out there today.

Advertisement

Just before GM debuted the 3.0-liter Duramax for the 2019 Chevy Silverado 1500 and GMC Sierra 1500 trucks, Ford introduced its own 3.0-liter Power Stroke V6 for the 2018 model year as an option for the best-selling F-150 pickup. While these two 3.0-liter engines differ in very substantial ways — different layout, different power outputs, different availability and so on — the goal for both trucks was the same: Bringing the same diesel torque and fuel economy from their heavy-duty siblings into the smaller half-ton package. So let’s take a look at how that worked out and how these two half-ton diesel truck engines compare.

Advertisement

Inline-six vs V6 battle

Before looking at the engines head-to-head, it’s important to point out the elephant in the room — the 3.0 Power Stroke engine is no longer available in a new pickup, and it hasn’t been for a while. Ford discontinued the F-150’s diesel engine option back in 2021, meaning it was only on the market for a few short years. Even so, the short-lived Ford 3.0 Power Stroke makes for an interesting comparison to both the LM2 3.0 Duramax it competed against at the time, and the updated LZ0 version of the engine that GM offers today.

We can start with the biggest difference between the two engines, that being the fact that the Power Stroke 3.0 is a V6 engine while the Duramax is an inline-six. Additionally, while the F-150 might be considered the quintessential all-American pickup truck, the 3.0 Power Stroke actually had its roots in Europe, as it came from the Lion diesel engine family used by both Ford of Europe and other European brands. Likewise, the 3.0 Duramax has a hint of European DNA as well, as GM co-developed the engine with the FEV Group of Germany.

While the Power Stroke’s 250 horsepower rating wasn’t particularly impressive, diesel buyers were likely much more interested in the engine’s 440 lb-ft of torque. The Ford engine, however, was outgunned by the Duramax at the time, with the Chevy engine making 277 horsepower and 460 pound-feet of torque.

Advertisement

Differing priorities

Thanks in large part to the Duramax’s advantage in power and torque, the Silverado got the nod over the F-150 in diesel-powered half-ton truck comparisons at the time. Then, the 3.0 Duramax was  made even better with a 2023 update that gave it a substantial power bump to 305 horsepower and 495 pound-feet of torque. However, even if Ford’s 3.0 Power Stroke experiment was short-lived, and diesel F-150s are rare sights on the road, that doesn’t necessarily mean the engine was a failure on its own merits. 

Some still praise the 3.0 Power Stroke for its excellent fuel economy and smoothness, with a feeling that Ford pulled the plug before the engine’s potential was fully realized. Ford, however, decided to place its priorities on the F-150’s EcoBoost gasoline engines and hybrid powertrain options rather than sticking with the diesel. 

Advertisement

GM’s venture into smaller displacement diesel engine truck engines has proven more successful and longer lasting than Ford’s, with Chevy and GMC not just keeping the Duramax 3.0 on the market after Ford pulled out, but also giving the engine substantial updates as well. Today, when compared against the traditional Chevy 5.3 gasoline V8, the Silverado 1500’s 3.0 Duramax continues to hold its own with its impressive low-end torque delivery and fuel efficiency — albeit at a higher price.



Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Apple Faces ‘Massive Dilemma’ With Success of the MacBook Neo

Published

on

Apple may have a supply problem on its hands with the MacBook Neo… The laptop reportedly relies on “binned” A18 Pro chips with one GPU core disabled, and demand is so strong that the supply of those cheaper leftover chips could run out before the next model is ready. That leaves Apple choosing between lower margins, shifting production plans, or changing the lineup to keep its $599 hit product in stock. MacRumors reports: The all-new MacBook Neo has been such a hit that Apple is facing a “massive dilemma,” according to Taiwan-based tech columnist and former Bloomberg reporter Tim Culpan. […] In the latest edition of his Culpium newsletter today, Culpan said the MacBook Neo is selling so well that Apple’s supply of the binned A18 Pro chips with a 5-core GPU will “run out” before the company is able to fully satisfy demand for the laptop. Apple’s initial plan was to have suppliers build around five to six million MacBook Neo units before ceasing production of the model with the A18 Pro chip, he said, but it sounds like demand is so strong that Apple might run out of A18 Pro chips to put in the MacBook Neo before the second-generation MacBook Neo with an A19 Pro chip is ready next year. Apple is unlikely to mark the MacBook Neo as temporarily sold out, so it may be forced to take action, but profit margins might be affected.

A18 Pro chips are manufactured with TSMC’s second-generation 3nm process, known as N3E, and Culpan said TSMC’s N3E production lines are currently operating at maximum capacity. As a result, he said that Apple may have to pay a premium to restart A18 Pro chip production for the MacBook Neo, which would lower its profit margins. Apple would have to disable a GPU core on these chips to ensure that they have only a 5-core GPU, like all other MacBook Neo units sold to date. Alternatively, Culpan said that Apple could reallocate some of its chip production that was originally planned for other devices, but he said the cost would still be higher than what it paid for its initial batch of A18 Pro chips.

Culpan speculated that Apple could also opt to discontinue the $599 model with 256GB of storage, leaving the $699 model with 512GB of storage and a Touch ID button as the only configuration available. This is unlikely to happen any time soon, in our view, given how heavily Apple has been promoting the MacBook Neo’s affordability. Apple might also be able to move up the release of a MacBook Neo with the iPhone 17 Pro’s A19 Pro chip, but that too would be a costlier option, at least until the company achieves a sufficient stockpile of binned A19 Pro chips with a 5-core GPU. In any case, Apple could opt to keep the starting price of current and future MacBook Neo models at $599 and simply accept lower profit margins on the laptop, especially given that it attracts customers to the macOS and broader Apple ecosystem.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Google Maps uses Gemini to write captions for your photos

Published

on

In short: Google Maps now uses Gemini to suggest captions when users share photos of places, launching on iOS in the U.S. and expanding globally to Android in the coming months, the latest step in a six-month campaign to weave AI into every layer of Maps.

Sharing a photo on Google Maps has always required a small act of will: you take the shot, upload it, and then stare at a blank text field deciding whether the restaurant you just visited warrants a full sentence or nothing at all. Most people choose nothing. As of 7 April 2026, Google is trying to fix that with Gemini. The company announced that Google Maps will now analyse uploaded photos and videos and automatically suggest a caption, giving contributors what it describes as a head start on writing. Users can accept, edit, or delete the suggestion. The feature is live now in English on iOS in the United States, with a global rollout to Android in the coming months.

The change is minor in scope and meaningful in intent. Google Maps is powered by user-generated content at a scale few platforms match: more than 120 million Local Guides contribute to the platform, collectively uploading an estimated 300 million photos per year and generating more than 20 million contributions every day, across reviews, ratings, edits, and imagery. That content forms the factual substrate of the map. The quality of a restaurant’s listing, the accuracy of a hotel’s photos, the legibility of a new business’s page, all of it depends on people choosing to write something rather than nothing when they open the share screen. Removing the friction of the blank text box, even slightly, is a data quality decision as much as a user experience one.

How Gemini captions work

The mechanics are straightforward. When a user selects a photo or video to share on Maps, Gemini analyses the image, identifies the subject and context, and generates a suggested caption. The user sees that suggestion before posting and can modify it freely or remove it entirely. Google has framed the tool as assistive rather than automated: the caption is a starting point, not a published output. That framing matters both for user trust and for the platform’s content standards, since a caption Google helped write would carry a different kind of liability if it were factually wrong.

Advertisement

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

The feature builds on capabilities Google has been deploying in Maps for several months. In November 2025, the company introduced its first Gemini-powered navigation features, including landmark-based directions that tell drivers to turn “after the Thai Siam Restaurant” rather than “in 200 metres.” In January 2026, Gemini-assisted guidance expanded to cycling and walking. On 12 March 2026, Google announced Ask Maps, a conversational search mode drawing on more than 300 million places and 500 million community reviews to answer complex, natural-language queries, alongside Immersive Navigation, which it described as the biggest overhaul to driving directions in a decade. The AI photo caption feature is the next increment in that sequence, extending Gemini from navigation and search into the content creation workflow that keeps the map fresh. Last year’s aggressive AI deployment across Google’s product suite set the pace for this rollout, and Maps is now clearly a priority target.

The data flywheel behind the feature

The strategic logic is not hard to decode. Google Maps’ value proposition rests on having more accurate, more comprehensive, and more up-to-date information about more places than any competitor. That information advantage is maintained primarily through user contributions, not through Google’s own editorial staff. Anything that increases contribution volume — particularly captioned, contextualised photos rather than captionless image dumps — strengthens the map’s relevance for search and discovery. A photo with a descriptive caption (“wide outdoor seating, dog-friendly, gets busy after 6pm”) is more useful to someone planning a visit than an unlabelled image of a table.

Advertisement

The timing also reflects competitive pressure. ChatGPT’s expanding role in local search and recommendations has become a live concern for Google’s Maps and Search businesses, and as AI models begin to monetise local intent directly, the quality of the underlying place data they can draw on becomes a competitive moat. Google’s Local Guides network is one of its most significant proprietary assets in this context. Lowering the bar for high-quality contributions helps keep that dataset ahead of what rivals can source or replicate.

The quality paradox

There is a tension the caption feature will need to navigate carefully. Making it easier to share content on Maps does not automatically make the content better. Google removed more than 160 million photos and 3.5 million videos from Maps in its most recent content moderation period, citing policy violations or low quality. The platform also took down more than 960,000 reviews in 2024 that were flagged as fake or policy-breaching, and has since deployed Gemini specifically to detect AI-generated reviews and suspicious profile edits. Lowering the friction of photo sharing means lowering the friction for poor-quality or manipulated content as well as good-quality contributions.

Google’s apparent answer is to use the same AI that generates captions to assist moderation — using Gemini both to write content and to screen it. That dual role is becoming a structural feature of large platforms managing AI-assisted user-generated content, and it raises questions about governance that extend well beyond maps or photos. The governance of AI in content pipelines remains one of the unresolved infrastructure challenges of this moment, and the Maps caption feature is a small but instructive case study: beneficial automation and content risk reduction require the same underlying model to play two opposing roles simultaneously.

iOS first, then the world

The iOS-first, U.S.-first rollout is consistent with Google’s standard pattern for Gemini feature launches. Ask Maps launched in the U.S. and India before expanding; Immersive Navigation started with U.S. drivers before moving to other markets. The English-only restriction on captions reflects the additional complexity of generating contextually appropriate, grammatically natural text in languages where AI performance varies more significantly. An expansion to Android and to non-English markets “in the coming months” is the expected trajectory, though Google has not specified which languages will follow first.

Advertisement

The competitive landscape for AI-assisted mapping is also shifting at the model infrastructure level. Microsoft’s push for model independence from OpenAI includes vision and multimodal capabilities that could eventually power competing location-based features, and the image understanding underpinning Google’s caption suggestions is precisely the kind of capability where the gap between frontier models and mid-tier alternatives is narrowing quickly. For now, Google’s advantage is integration depth rather than raw model performance: Gemini works inside Maps because Maps is Google’s, and no competitor has equivalent leverage over the contribution workflow of 120 million users.

The blank caption box has existed in Google Maps for years. It turns out the simplest way to get people to fill it in is to fill it in for them and let them decide whether to keep it.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Russian YouTubers Somehow Turned A Boxer Engine Into An Inline-Four

Published

on





There are many unique attributes that have made Subaru such a successful auto brand. One is the company’s signature symmetrical all-wheel-drive system, which comes standard on the majority of Subaru vehicles. There’s also the fact that Subaru was an early player in the now-dominant crossover SUV market, building a brand identity around car-based SUVs like the Forester and Outback beginning back in the 1990s.

Then there are the engines. While many Subaru crossover drivers might not pay much attention to their engine layout, gearheads and enthusiasts know that the Subaru boxer four-cylinder is one of the most distinctive engines in the world. For decades, the horizontally opposed Subaru boxer has distinguished itself from more common inline and V-layout engines with its unique weight distribution, power delivery, and engine sound. 

Advertisement

With that in mind, it seems a little insane that someone would try to turn the iconic, unique Subaru boxer engine into a more traditional inline four-cylinder. But that’s exactly what a pair of Russian YouTubers from the Garage 54 channel did in their workshop. While we are still scratching our heads over exactly why someone would want to do this, there’s no denying the uniqueness  — and comedy — of this project.

Advertisement

Don’t try this at home

There are lots of things that separate flat engines from their inline counterparts, and before you question the reasoning of why anyone would want to convert one of Subaru’s unique flat-four engines into the industry-standard inline-four, you have to understand there’s a whole genre of YouTube mechanic content that’s a little off the wall, and done more for the entertainment value and the “what if” factor, rather than any practical application. 

The guys from Garage 54 specialize in these strange projects and experiments, which in the past have included things like putting three turbochargers on a Toyota 2JZ engine and powering a Lada with an engine made of 50 cordless drills. This, however, doesn’t mean there isn’t serious mechanical skill involved.  While the Subaru engine project may have resulted in a “generic” inline-four engine, getting there was no easy task. 

The Subaru engine that the guys started with has two pistons and a cylinder head with two camshafts on each side, so the project required cutting the engine block in half, joining the two sides together, and rearranging the cylinder heads in line with each other. Obviously, this task is easier said than done, as the Subaru engine components and castings were never designed to be used as part of an inline layout — but they pulled it off.

Advertisement

From flat-four to inline-four

Among the engineering hurdles the guys ran into while designing and fabricating the new engine was the need for an extra Subaru engine to donate its crankcase and crankshaft parts for the new motor. Additionally, combining the formerly separate cylinder heads into a single inline head meant welding the camshafts together, and the engine uses two oil pans rather than a single pan, as you find under a normal inline-four engine.

Advertisement

At this point, the guys have basically built their own Subaru inline-four long block engine, complete with a cylinder head, but there’s still a long way to go before the motor is ready to fire up. For starters, the homemade engine still needs exhaust and intake manifolds, plumbing, and a cooling system — but the project is off to an impressive start. Surely Garage 54 will make more videos as they continue the process of completing and running this one-of-a-kind engine in a vehicle.

Yes, this may have been a ton of work just to get the same type of four-cylinder engine found in most mainstream vehicles, but it’s hard to deny the ingenuity and mechanical skills on display here. This also just scratches the surface of what could be done with skilled mechanics and fabricators playing around with Subaru engines. How cool would it be to see two 2.5-liter Subaru boxer fours combined into one 5.0-liter flat-eight?

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

How to watch NASA’s moon crew splash down at end of historic mission

Published

on

The Artemis II astronauts have looped around the moon, captured some extraordinary imagery (above), set a slew of records, and are now on their way back to Earth.

The 10-day mission will reach its climax on Friday, April 10, during a dramatic homecoming that will see the Orion spacecraft enter our planet’s atmosphere at a speed of nearly 25,000 miles per hour.

During the moments that follow, Artemis II crew members Victor Glover, Reid Wiseman, Christina Koch, and Jeremy Hansen will experience a 16-minute roller coaster ride as their vehicle experiences the mission’s greatest forces yet.

At the end of the uncrewed Artemis I mission in 2022, the spacecraft suffered unexpected heat shield damage during reentry, though the vehicle splashed down in one piece. While engineers have implemented changes to ensure the spacecraft’s structural integrity, those final moments as it reenters Earth’s atmosphere later this week will nevertheless be the most perilous of the entire mission for everyone involved — not least the four crew members.

Advertisement

How to watch

NASA will provide a live stream of the crew’s homecoming on NASA+ and also its YouTube channel. The video player embedded above will also show the same feed.

Below is NASA’s latest schedule for Friday. If the timings change, we’ll update this information just as soon as we can. All times are in Eastern Time.

6:30 p.m.: NASA begins its coverage of the crew’s return.

Advertisement

7:33 p.m.: Orion crew module and service module separate.

7:37 p.m.: The Orion will briefly fire its thrusters in preparation for reentry.

7:53 p.m.: An important moment as Orion first encounters Earth’s atmosphere. The vehicle’s heat shield is designed to protect the spacecraft from temperatures of about 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit — about half as hot as the surface of the sun. Orion will decelerate at a rate up to four times the force of gravity, causing the astronauts to feel four times heavier than they do on Earth.

8:07 p.m.: Following various parachute deployments to slow Orion down, splashdown will occur in the Pacific Ocean about 50 miles off the coast of California, bringing to an end a historic mission that paves the way for a crewed lunar landing as early as 2028.

Advertisement

10 p.m.: A post-splashdown news conference will take place at NASA’s Johnson Space Center.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Hear Ye, Hear Ye! The Magic Of The Scroll-Like Phone Which Wast Not!

Published

on

When LG left the smartphone market, quite a number of strange devices were left behind. While some, like the Wing, made it to consumers, others did not. The strangest of these would have to be their rollable phone concept; a device which would expand by unrolling a portion of the screen like a scroll. This never made it to market, but one managed to make its way to [JerryRigEverything’s] workbench, and we are fortunate enough to see the insides of this strange device. 

There are a few interesting tidbits about the device before even entering the device. Very clearly this phone was ready to be sold, with a tidy user interface for expanding the display, and even animated wallpapers which which expand with it. The display, when rolled onto the back of the device, sits behind a glass cover to keep it protected from debris, and can be used to take selfies with the larger sensors of the rear facing cameras. You can also see a bit of the track that the screen rolls on, hinting at what lies inside.

The “zipper-like” sliding sliding mechanism.

One doesn’t have to get far into a teardown of this phone to find more. A tiny brush hides in the curved corner of the screen rolling mechanism, to keep debris out of the pocket the screen sits inside. This also gives a better look at the aforementioned track system, which guides the display around the corner and keeps it stable and secure.

Further inside, you can see the mechanism which allow the phone to unfurl. Two rather small, but powerful DC motors resting a rack and pinion move the surprisingly strong phone to its full sized state. A number of spring loaded arms provide stability to the mechanism, preventing racking. The mechanism is surprisingly strong, able to push a number of books out of its way. However, if its movement is resisted, it will display a warning that you might damage the phone.

Tearing down a phone that doesn’t exist is not terribly useful, so the focus was very much on the mechanism, with no detours or destructive disassembly. However, if destructive reverse engineering is what your here for, make sure to check out this teardown of a smart LEGO brick next!

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025