Security teams log 54% of successful attacks and alert on just 14%. The rest move through your environment unseen.
The Picus whitepaper shows how breach and attack simulation tests your SIEM and EDR rules so threats stop slipping by detection.
In my eight years of writing and reviewing broadband and routers, I’ve rarely seen news that I would describe as unprecedented. The FCC’s March 23 decision to ban foreign-made routers is absolutely unprecedented.
The sweeping order applies to any router in which any stage of “manufacturing, assembly, design and development” occurs outside the US — in other words, just about any router you can buy right now. The argument is that they pose “unacceptable risks” to national security. Ironically, the order also prevents existing foreign-made routers from receiving vital security updates after Jan. 1, 2029, an extension of the initial March 1, 2027, deadline.
The ban doesn’t apply to routers that were already authorized by the FCC — only new models that haven’t been approved yet. That means every router that was available before the order is still available today, and router companies can still restock them using their existing manufacturing processes. So far, both Eero and Netgear have received exemptions from the ban, and will be able to sell new models in the US going forward.
Essentially, the FCC is freezing the Wi-Fi router market. As William Budington, a technologist for the digital rights nonprofit Electronic Frontier Foundation, put it to me, “This is using an extremely blunt instrument.”
Where previous FCC bans have been limited to specific companies, such as last year’s push to ban TP-Link routers, this one affects an entire industry. So where does that leave someone who needs a new Wi-Fi router? Should you buy a model you’ve had your eye on in case it sells out? Or is it better to wait and see which companies the FCC considers foreign-made?
I know what I would do, but I gut-checked my advice with four cybersecurity experts. Turns out, we agree.
When I first saw the FCC’s announcement, I couldn’t stop thinking about how much chaos this would introduce to the US router market. As I tried to tease out which manufacturers would count as “foreign-made,” it quickly became clear how deeply international the supply chains for routers are.
Take Netgear. While it’s a US-founded and headquartered company, it manufactures routers in Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia and Taiwan. According to a recent report from the trade group Global Electronics Association, “Virtually no consumer router is manufactured entirely within the United States.”
I don’t have any issues recommending routers that were manufactured abroad. After all, they’d already gone through the FCC’s authorization process, and I haven’t seen convincing evidence that any one router brand has more hardware vulnerabilities than another.
Thomas Pace, CEO of cybersecurity firm NetRise, told me last year during an interview about the potential TP-Link ban: “We’ve analyzed an astonishing amount of TP-Link firmware. We find stuff, but we find stuff in everything.”
I just finished testing, reviewing and rating over 30 routers, and after years of resistance, I finally concluded that Wi-Fi 7 routers are worth the money for the speeds you get. While I stand by my recommendations, with this ban in place, the router you buy today may not be any good in a year.
Then I saw the FCC’s Public Notice on the ban, which specifies that manufacturers can continue providing software and firmware updates “at least until March 1, 2027,” which has since been extended to at least Jan. 1, 2029. That means if you own a foreign-made router — if you own any router, in other words — it won’t be able to get security patches after that deadline.
That’s why I think the wise move here is to wait on buying one if you can. Keeping your router’s firmware up-to-date is an essential part of securing your home network. If you buy from a router company that doesn’t get an exemption from this ban, you risk having an unsecured device a year from now.
It’s an ironic side effect of an order that is ostensibly designed to keep Americans safer: They may no longer be able to get the latest security fixes.
“If you’re limiting the ability of people to get security updates, then you’re making the problem worse, not better,” Alan Butler, senior counsel at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, told me. “A lot of those routers are going to turn into pumpkins in a year unless they extend this waiver.”
By saying you can update your firmware “at least until Jan. 1, 2029,” the FCC does leave some wiggle room for an extension, and the Commission has suggested it could remove the deadline entirely. But until we know more about which companies the FCC considers foreign-made and which will be exempt, I wouldn’t feel comfortable recommending spending money on a new router right now.
“The risk is very real,” said Rik Ferguson, vice president of security intelligence at cybersecurity company Forescout. “If you find yourself in a situation where that update pipeline has been switched off, then you definitely have to consider whether you want to keep using that device.”
“The risk just keeps going the longer time passes, because chances are that there will be new vulnerabilities being found that you cannot patch,” added Daniel Dos Santos, vice president of research at Forescout.
If your old router stopped working, I’m not going to tell you to wait for clarity from the FCC to get back on Wi-Fi — the timeline for concern is more in years than months. A good compromise might be to buy an older budget router rather than the latest Wi-Fi 7 model you’ve had your eye on. But if you can afford to wait a month or two, it’s worth exercising some caution.
“I do think this is going to become a mess very quickly,” Butler said.
This is the messiest point in the process we’re likely to see. As the dust settles in the coming weeks, we’ll likely have better information on which routers will still be safe to use a year from now.
TP-Link is one of the most popular router brands in the US, and the subject of several 2025 government investigations.
Where does this order leave the 70% of Americans who rent their internet equipment from their internet service providers? The FCC’s ban will impact them, too, as they also rely heavily on foreign-made routers.
Essentially, my advice is no different than it is for people who own their routers: Don’t panic, and wait to see how things shake out. If you haven’t upgraded your equipment in a few years, now might be a good time to call your ISP and ask them what options are available. But it’s not likely that they’ll proactively replace them on their own, says Doug Dawson, a veteran broadband analyst and author of the industry blog POTs and PANs.
“I don’t see any mass replacement of these things, because it’s just too much money,” Dawson told me. “I’d guess before any deadline on firmware updates, they’re going to issue those three days before that and then they’re going to cross their fingers that they don’t start seeing problems.”
When I polled four cybersecurity experts, I was surprised to find that they were generally in favor of the FCC taking action to protect router security in theory, but critical of the execution.
“It’s going to impact many harmless products in order to stem a real problem,” Budington said. “It’s also not particularly well-targeted, since routers are only one part of the problem, along with IoT devices.”
The FCC says that routers produced abroad were “directly implicated” in the Volt, Flax and Salt Typhoon cyberattacks. These attacks aren’t necessarily targeting an average person’s data, but they can turn your router into a tool to be used in malicious attacks.
“The individual user who owns the router probably doesn’t even know anything about it,” Butler said. “It’s happening in the background without their knowledge, and it’s not necessarily affecting them directly in any way that they can notice.”
In the Salt Typhoon attack, hackers gained access to data from millions of people through their internet providers, aiming to gain access to information from court-authorized wiretaps. It was a particularly bold instance of a tried-and-true hacker approach called “spray and pray”: Find default login credentials and try them on as many connected devices as you can.
“It can be only one router out of 5,000, but that one can be a bingo,” Sergey Shykevich, a threat intelligence manager at Check Point Research, told me about these types of attacks. “It’s mostly just easy. In many cases, you don’t have to be a very sophisticated actor, or even nation-state, in order to be successful.”
It’s just as easy for hackers to gain access through a router’s default credentials as it is for you to change your own settings. Most routers have an app that lets you update your login credentials from there, but you can also type your router’s IP address into a URL. These are different from your Wi-Fi name and password, which should also be changed every six months or so. It’s also a good idea to keep your firmware updated, which you can do automatically in your router’s settings or by manually downloading updates in your router’s app or web portal.
I wish I could point to another time when the FCC ordered a blanket ban on an entire category of consumer products, but nothing like this has happened before. Manufacturers can apply for “Conditional Approval,” and they are likely scrambling behind the scenes to make the cut. When I reached out to the FCC for more clarity on the order, I was referred to the commission’s “Covered List” FAQ page.
My best guess is that we’ll learn more specifics on which companies are banned in the next month or so — an estimate that was echoed by two industry observers I spoke with. But the wait could be even longer. Budington told me he thinks router companies might wait until the ban is lifted rather than hustle to try to move their entire supply chains to the US.
No matter how it shakes out, we’ll likely look back on this as the most chaotic chapter of the router ban story. Unless you need a new router immediately, there’s a good chance you’ll be able to make a more informed decision a month from now.
This story is part of a series commemorating the five-year anniversary of the Voices of Change fellowship. Jennifer Yoo-Brannon, a Voices of Change fellow in 2021-22, is an instructional coach and professional learning leader in El Monte, California.
In 2021, I was a demoralized educator: not burnt out, but demoralized. As I shared in my first article for EdSurge, demoralization occurs when teachers “encounter consistent and pervasive challenges to enacting the values that motivate their work.”
That year, the pervasive challenges seemed obvious and communal. We were all navigating online platforms, figuring out how to replicate student services virtually and struggling to make up for lost time in instruction, social-skill development and relationship-building for when students returned to in-person schooling.
When I think about what feels most pressing now, it seems those challenges persist but are perhaps less obvious to society at large. As the authors of “Going the Distance: The Teaching Profession in a Post-COVID World (2024)” wrote:
A crisis is not merely an event: it’s the context in which an event takes place and the response to that event.” The global pandemic has ended, but how much has the context changed and did the response meet the needs?
Right now, I believe teaching is the most important thing we can do. When the world is on fire, what feels most pressing is teaching students to claim their humanity and helping educators understand how much the communal learning experience matters. Five years later, I have come full circle.
This time, I return to that same claim with a broader and deeper understanding of what makes a school. We use that old adage, “It takes a village…” More and more, I see that we, as school communities, are the village and the villagers that we need right now. What really makes a school more human is not just the principals and teachers, but the child welfare staff, paraeducators, campus supervisors, guidance counselors, cafeteria workers, coaches, librarians, custodians and secretaries. The list is long, but it feels necessary to name the people on campus who make students feel like they belong, support them and have their backs when students need it. These are the colleagues who have shown me what it is like to truly model humanity to our students.
The truth is that the onus is on all of us to create an environment in which mutual respect and empathy are the baseline expectations. So, as an instructional coach, as a leader and as a voice of change in this context, what can I do? How do I communicate to teachers that, while they have been beaten down and blamed for society’s ills, they also have the herculean task of helping students learn how to be human together?
In 2021, I said that I was demoralized. In 2026, I am revitalized and committed to my role as an educator, instructional coach and teacher advocate.
Since participating in the inaugural cohort of the Voices of Change fellowship, I have contributed essays to The California Educator, Edutopia and EdSurge. I have joined podcast panels to talk about social-emotional learning, culturally responsive teaching and civil discourse in the classroom.
This fellowship showed me the power of personal writing for representation and advocacy. I have started to write children’s books about my own neurodivergent children. I have presented at local and state conferences and will continue to use my voice and my words to advocate for students, for educators, for quality professional development and schools that model the best of humanity. Writing for the Voices of Change fellowship has helped me claim my voice, my humanity and my power.
This story is part of an EdSurge series chronicling diverse educator experiences. These stories are made publicly available with support from the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative. EdSurge maintains editorial control over all content. (Read our ethics statement here.) This work is licensed under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
At long last, a corporate training you might actually enjoy.
Cybersecurity AI company Adaptive Security has partnered with famed comedian Conan O’Brien for a 15-part educational video series. These training videos will help Adaptive’s clients and their employees to navigate threats such as phishing and deepfakes.
Considering how often corporate trainings are a total snoozefest, getting a genuinely funny and smart person to present this critical information seems like a smart, if expensive, move. The clip currently promoting the partnership on Adaptive’s website even kicks off with a joke about O’Brien only doing the gig for the money.
More broadly, it’s great to see a business investing in this type of education to ensure that people really do follow best practices for online safety. The FTC said social media scams cost Americans at least $2.1 billion last year. Companies that might have access to even bigger bank accounts, not to mention sensitive information, make for even juicier targets. And AI tools can make cons awfully convincing and easier to pull off.
Luckily, there are plenty of common sense rules you can follow to keep the troublemakers at bay. We aren’t lucky enough to have Conan narrating them, but just queue up the monorail episode of The Simpsons to play in the background while you read some of Engadget’s top cybersecurity tips for a near-identical experience.
ServiceNow is warning about a security incident after attackers exploited an unauthenticated access flaw through a vulnerable API endpoint, allowing them to query data from customer instances.
The company quietly warned impacted customers through a support bulletin and direct support cases after detecting “anomalous activity” related to the issue.
The bulletin, which is hidden behind ServiceNow’s customer support login portal, states that the company applied a security update to hosted customer instances on June 5, 2026.
“On June 5, 2026, ServiceNow applied a security update to hosted customer instances,” reads the support bulletin.
“The update concerned a security issue that could allow an unauthenticated user, in certain circumstances, to gain greater access to ServiceNow instances than intended.”
The company says this security update changes the API endpoint configuration to limit access to authenticated users only.
ServiceNow also confirmed that attackers exploited this flaw to successfully query the customer instance tables.
While ServiceNow did not disclose which data was accessed during the attacks, instances commonly store sensitive enterprise information, including IT support tickets, employee records, internal documentation, asset inventories, security incident reports, workflow data, and configuration details for corporate systems and services.
Support case information has become an increasingly popular target for threat actors, as tickets can contain credentials, API tokens, internal documentation, and authentication secrets shared during troubleshooting.
According to the advisory, ServiceNow has now opened support cases with affected customers. If a customer has not received one, they are not believed to be affected by the incident.
While ServiceNow has not publicly disclosed technical details about the flaw, administrators discussing the incident on Reddit say the issue appears to be tied to a REST endpoint at ‘/api/now/related_list_edit/create‘.
One commenter claimed the endpoint was configured with ‘requires_authentication=false‘, potentially allowing unauthenticated requests to access instance data. The security update released on Friday was allegedly used to set requires_authentication to true.
Numerous admins shared indicators of compromise, including API requests from the IP address ‘51.159.98.241,’ advising other administrators to review logs for requests to the vulnerable endpoint.
The bulletin states the issue primarily impacts customers running the Australia platform release or customers on older releases who made certain configuration changes.
“The security issue pertains to customers who are on the Australia platform release or made certain configuration changes to instances on releases prior to Australia,” ServiceNow warned.
BleepingComputer contacted ServiceNow earlier today after a reader alerted us to the incident, asking how long the activity had been ongoing, what caused the issue, and whether customer data had been stolen. We did not receive a response before publication.
ServiceNow says it is still evaluating whether it will publish a CVE for the issue.
Administrators are advised to review ServiceNow logs for requests to /api/now/related_list_edit, particularly from the IP address 51.159.98.241.
Impacted organizations should review exposed tickets and records for sensitive information, rotate credentials or tokens shared through support workflows, and ensure API logging is enabled.
Security teams log 54% of successful attacks and alert on just 14%. The rest move through your environment unseen.
The Picus whitepaper shows how breach and attack simulation tests your SIEM and EDR rules so threats stop slipping by detection.
When a verdict map is deleted from memory, catchall elements are deactivated and a chain’s reference counter is decremented. When errors occur the deletion can be reversed and the counter incremented. CVE-2026-53111 allows for that process to be altered. As a result, the exploit can decrement the variable an arbitrary number of times and then delete and free the chain when some objects still point to it.
“In this blog post, we have seen how one incorrect exclamation mark introduced a use-after-free vulnerability which can be exploited by an unprivileged user on Debian and Ubuntu to escalate privileges to root,” researchers from security firm Exodus Intelligence wrote Monday. “Although the exploit triggers the use-after-free vulnerability multiple times to leak the kernel base address, leak heap addresses, and hijack the control flow, the stability tests resulted in a stability of >99% on an idle system.”
The vulnerability was fixed in the kernel in February and subsequently back ported to major Linux distributions. Security firm FuzzingLabs demonstrated a proof of concept exploit in April. Exodus Intelligence, which discovered the bug, included its own PoC exploit in Monday’s post. It worked on Debian and Ubuntu.
CVE-2026-53111 is one of at least three potent elevation-of-privilege vulnerabilities to hit Linux in recent weeks. The vulnerabilities are serious, because, when chained to a separate exploit, they can be used to evade security defenses baked into the OS.
Shopee’s neighbourhood collection point network has quietly become part of Singapore’s daily landscape since 2023.
The e-commerce firm has established over 2,800 collection points across Singapore as of today, including residential addresses, convenience stores, and lockers—placing most homes within 250m of their nearest pickup option.
This kills two birds with one stone.
For customers, it offers a more affordable and convenient delivery option, with savings of up to S$1.99 in delivery fees per item. For ordinary Singaporeans, it creates an opportunity to earn passive income by turning their homes or businesses into micro logistics hubs.
But what does running a Shopee collection point actually look like behind the scenes?


Shopee’s logistics arm, SPX Express, delivers parcels in bulk to registered collection points. For locker locations, customers can collect their orders independently.
At manned collection points—typically neighbourhood shops or residential addresses—the host stores the parcels, verifies customers’ identities using the Shopee app when they arrive, and hands over the items.
In return, hosts earn a fee for each parcel distributed. The role requires seemingly little: just sufficient storage space, an internet-connected device, and a commitment to the collection point’s operating hours.
Hosts generally earn between S$0.20 and S$0.30 per parcel. Channel News Asia also previously reported in 2024 that hosts earn at least S$90 per month.
At the higher end, promotional information on Shopee’s app states that collection points that distribute up to 900 parcels a day can earn up to S$5,400 monthly, while 60 parcels daily can bring S$360 monthly.
Sounds like easy passive income, right? Wrong.
The commitment to turning your house into a Shopee collection point is far from passive.
Hosts must be open at least six days a week, for a minimum of 36 hours. On top of that, they must be present during operating hours to receive and hand over parcels, effectively tying the role to someone being at home consistently.


At first glance, the economics can look appealing. But at S$0.30 per parcel, the numbers only start to make sense at scale.
For example, handling 30 parcels a day translates to just S$9 in daily earnings. That’s already 30 separate customer handovers—yet it remains a modest payout for the time and space involved. Scaling up is where the workload intensifies significantly, with hundreds of daily parcels required to generate meaningful income.
Space is another major constraint. Many HDB flats have limited storage capacity, which can quickly become a bottleneck during peak delivery periods.
There is also little flexibility in scheduling. If hosts miss their operating hours, Shopee can impose penalties for non-compliance. At S$0.30 per parcel, even a S$50 fine effectively wipes out the earnings from more than 160 parcels.


Running a Shopee collection point means juggling the expectations of multiple parties: Shopee, customers, and even neighbours.
Complaints from hosts extend well beyond financial concerns.
Parcels arrive daily and are often left at the doorstep, making the host responsible for their safekeeping. Despite a stated weight limit of 6kg, some hosts have reportedly received bulkier items such as dumbbells, adding to storage and handling strain.
Some customers also arrive outside operating hours—occasionally as late as after 10PM—expecting collections regardless of the stated timing. Others treat the collection point like an extension of Shopee’s customer service, seeking assistance with orders, returns, and complaints that have nothing to do with the host.
“Operating a collection point is hard work and not a passive job like many think,” wrote the child of elderly parents who previously hosted a Shopee collection point at their home in a Reddit post.
Beyond the operational burden, some neighbours of residential collection points have also raised concerns about increased foot traffic outside their homes, citing potential security risks and a loss of privacy. The host is therefore not only managing their own household space, but also the flow of people in shared residential corridors.
“My post is just to let people know the realities of operating a collection point and not to trust the rosy picture that Shopee painted,” the same Reddit user added.


It is important to note, however, that not everyone has the same negative experience.
Generally, running a Shopee collection point would make more sense for shop owners. Two store owners whose shops became Shopee collection points in 2023 reported more customers than before.
At one store, many parcel collectors became regulars, while the other attracted new customers beyond its usual base. With the hours and foot traffic already there, the parcels become a free customer acquisition channel for their products on top of the per-parcel income.
For homemakers and retirees who are home throughout the day, the income genuinely adds up, especially if volume is high and the neighbourhood is a good fit.
But for someone already working or with young children at home, the intrusions can outweigh the returns quickly.
From Shopee’s perspective, the firm wins either way: collection points are an efficient logistics solution.
The company can expand its last-mile network without building warehouses or employing delivery staff as hosts absorb that cost in time and space, in exchange for a small per-parcel fee.
For customers, collection points offer free shipping with no minimum spend, along with the convenience of a nearby pickup point—often just a short walk away.
While the model works for both Shopee and its customers, the question remains whether it works as well for those turning their homes or shops into collection points.
Featured Image Credit: Shopee/ Andrew Koay
Something to look forward to: Searching local files should be one of the simplest and most basic features an operating system offers, but Windows 11 still makes the process unnecessarily awkward. However, that may soon change for the better.
During a recent meetup with Windows enthusiasts enrolled in the Windows Insiders program, Microsoft showcased several search-related changes that are expected to arrive in a future update to Windows. Redmond engineers are working on a set of relatively small features that could have a significant impact, starting with the ability to disable Bing integration in local Windows search.
One of the longest-standing complaints about Windows 11 is that it does not allow users to easily search only locally stored content from the Start menu. Instead, search results are often mixed with web content and even Microsoft Store listings, adding extra layers that many users find unnecessary when they are simply looking for files on their own device.
According to a recent confidential preview, Microsoft is expected to add a new option in the Settings app that disables web (Bing) integration in search. In addition, the “Privacy & security” section may also include an option to exclude Microsoft Store apps from search results.

Microsoft’s decision to closely integrate Bing into Windows 11 has long been considered controversial among users. Power users have often resorted to workarounds, such as editing the Windows Registry, to reduce or remove web search integration from their PC experience, while Microsoft has continued efforts to expand Bing’s role within the operating system.
Microsoft is now aiming to regain goodwill among Windows users, which could signal a shift away from pushing Bing integration on those who prefer not to use it. The new search customization options are expected to arrive in a future Windows 11 Insider preview build, although no specific timeline has been confirmed.
During the meetup, Microsoft also confirmed that local search will be significantly faster, along with improvements to the File Explorer shell. The company said bulk delete operations have already achieved a 30% performance improvement in internal Windows builds. The new search changes are expected to complement previously introduced speed and taskbar customization improvements.
The race to secure power for AI data centers has spilled over into some unusual places, including the automotive world.
Battery recycler Redwood Materials kicked off the trend last year with a new energy storage division and a project that attached old EV packs to a Crusoe data center in Nevada. Then, Ford said it was repurposing some of its battery manufacturing capacity to make grid-scale batteries. And now GM is announcing its own — arguably more ambitious — plans for an energy storage system (ESS).
GM unveiled on Tuesday two new phases in its attack on the energy storage market. The biggest swing by far is GM’s new partnership with energy storage startup Peak Energy. For that partnership, GM is developing an entirely new sodium-ion battery chemistry tailored for grid-scale deployments.
Outside of China, no automaker has announced plans to build sodium-ion cells.
“The way we’re getting into the market is the easy way, through ESS,” Kurt Kelty, vice president of battery and sustainability at GM, told TechCrunch. “The performance characteristics are just what is needed in that market.”
GM wouldn’t share with TechCrunch how much money it is investing in this energy storage effort. But we do know the company has committed $900 million to commercialize new battery chemistries, an investment that includes a new battery development center.
Sodium-ion batteries work similarly to lithium-ion, but they swap out key materials to make the cells cheaper, longer lasting, and less prone to overheating. The tradeoff is that sodium-ion batteries need to be larger and heavier to store the same amount of electricity.
Peak Energy has already been working on energy storage systems that use sodium-ion batteries. Because sodium-ion batteries behave differently from lithium-ion, Peak has developed an energy storage system with that in mind. Its grid-scale batteries don’t have cooling systems or fire suppression systems because there’s less risk of overheating. The setup reduces upfront costs, and it should also eliminate costly maintenance, Paul Menson, director of energy storage commercialization at GM, told TechCrunch.
“This is the manifestation of the hardest part to engineer is no part at all,” he said. “Eliminate the part, eliminate the problem.”
GM plans to sell sodium-ions cells to the startup, which will then integrate them into its products. But that won’t happen right away.
The first GM cells are expected to enter trial production at the company’s Battery Cell Development Center in 2028. TechCrunch was recently given an exclusive look at the new facility, which GM expects will cut about a year from the commercialization process for sodium-ion batteries, reducing costs in the process.
GM’s sodium-ion cells are still years away from commercial production, however. In the meantime, the automaker will sell lithium iron phosphate (LFP) cells to LG Energy Solution for use in its energy storage systems. LG Energy Solution already works with GM through its Ultium joint venture, which makes batteries for the automaker’s EVs.
Alongside the partnerships with LG and Peak, GM announced that it was expanding its work with Redwood Materials, the battery recycling and energy storage startup founded by former Tesla executive J.B. Straubel.
Redwood already buys scrap from GM’s battery factories and used battery packs from its EVs. GM has a pipeline of around 10,000 packs it’s sending to Redwood, and the startup has been operating a 12 megawatt/63-megawatt-hour migrogrid using second-life packs at a Crusoe data center in Sparks, Nevada. GM said it is buying a 7.2 megawatt-hour Redwood system for use at one of its plants in Michigan, which it estimates will save it around $3 million over its lifetime.
The GM installation is “a step one” for Redwood, Cal Lankton, chief commercial officer for Redwood, told TechCrunch.
Data centers, where Redwood already operates, and industrial sites like GM’s are “vastly different things,” he said. Where data centers might use batteries nearly continuously to absorb some of the power fluctuations from GPUs, industrial sites are more likely to use them to shave off peaks in power demand, which can lower monthly power bills, and use them to provide backup power in case of an outage.
“The factory is really excited because now we’ve got a more reliable factory,” Kelty said. “Ultimately, we’ll be having similar installations like this at all of our factories. It just makes good economic sense.”
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
Sony Electronics is making a massive upgrade to the humble meeting room screen. The company has just unveiled Crystal LED UNIFY, a massive 135-inch all-in-one direct-view LED display designed for boardrooms, meeting rooms, community spaces, and higher education environments.
At a glance, it might look like Sony’s next massive flagship living room TV, but it’s cutting edge display tech arriving to the office space. It is part of Sony’s professional display lineup and sits alongside its existing BRAVIA Professional Displays and Crystal LED portfolio. The model number is ZRL-135SG, and Sony is positioning it as a simpler way for organizations to add a large dvLED display without dealing with the usual complexity of custom LED wall projects.

One of the biggest selling points for the Crystal LED UNIFY is its convenience. It arrives as a complete package with five pre-assembled display units and a control unit. So installation is a relatively straightforward process that can be completed by two people in about an hour. Since direct-view LED installations can get complicated, Sony’s version of the tech isn’t just promising solid visuals. The appeal is the simplified ordering, installation, maintenance, and day-to-day use.
The display units are mounted on wall brackets and connected to the included control unit, while a slide-out, front-serviceable design should make maintenance easier after installation.
Coming to the fun part, Crystal LED UNIFY uses a 1.5mm pixel pitch, Full HD resolution, and 800 cd/m² brightness. Sony has also added Anti-Reflection Surface Technology, which should help visibility in brightly lit rooms where projectors often struggle. The display also supports 4K input, works with Sony’s Device Management Platform, and offers a familiar interface for organizations already using Pro BRAVIA displays. In other words, it should also slot into conference rooms or multi-display setups with needing an IT team to learn an entirely new ecosystem.

Sony has also put effort in making it look clean on a wall. The Crystal LED UNIFY has ultra-slim bezels, a concealed slide-out control unit, and a depth of under 100mm, or less than four inches, when used with the included wall-mount brackets. So it should fit seamlessly in professional spaces.
The company expects Crystal LED UNIFY to be available in early 2027, with plans for an early showcase at the upcoming InfoComm 2026 event in Las Vegas from June 17 to June 19. Pricing has not been announced yet, but this is clearly aimed at businesses, institutions, and premium professional spaces rather than home theater shoppers with unusually large walls.
On-device AI models have stayed small because the entire weight set has to live in DRAM, capping practical parameter counts well below what server-side deployments use. Enterprise architects evaluating agentic workloads have had to choose between capable cloud-dependent models and limited on-device ones. Apple’s third-generation foundation models, announced at WWDC26, break that constraint by moving the weight set off DRAM entirely.
The AFM 3 family was developed in collaboration with Google and spans five models: two on-device and three server-based, all running within Apple’s Private Cloud Compute boundary. The server-side models, including AFM 3 Cloud Pro for agentic tool use and complex reasoning, run on Nvidia GPUs in Google Cloud. The on-device architecture is Apple’s own. AFM 3 Core Advanced is a 20-billion-parameter model that stores weights in NAND flash rather than DRAM.
“Instead of forcing the entire model into DRAM, the full model is stored in flash memory,” Apple’s research team wrote. “Because NAND-to-DRAM bandwidth is too slow to swap weights token by token, as standard MoE models require, AFM 3 Core Advanced makes routing decisions per prompt.”
The memory wall Apple is working around is one every local AI developer runs into.
“You can’t put 20B parameters in RAM at any reasonable precision,” Awni Hannun, a researcher at Anthropic and former Apple research scientist, posted on X. “To make it work they are using pretty exotic architecture by today’s standards. A small model predicts from the query (or prompt) which experts to load from NAND into RAM.”
That prediction-and-load mechanism has three distinct components, each driven by the hardware constraints of consumer silicon.
The full 20B weight set lives in flash, not DRAM. AFM 3 Core Advanced stores its entire parameter set in NAND flash rather than active memory. Standard on-device deployments require the full model to fit in DRAM, which is what caps their parameter counts. Apple’s approach, which it calls Instruction-Following Pruning (IFP) and developed with its own researchers, treats flash as the model’s permanent home and DRAM as a working buffer for whichever experts a given prompt requires.
Expert routing happens once per prompt, not per token. In a conventional Mixture of Experts model, a router selects different experts for every token generated — which would require continuous weight movement between flash and DRAM at inference speed. NAND-to-DRAM bandwidth cannot support that. AFM 3 Core Advanced routes once at prompt time, selects a fixed expert set, loads it into DRAM alongside always-active shared experts, and generates all tokens from that same configuration.
“The key distinction from a typical MoE is that you do this once per query and then generate all the tokens with the same experts,” Hannun wrote.
Active parameter count scales from 1B to 4B depending on task complexity. Rather than running a fixed model size for every request, AFM 3 Core Advanced adjusts how many parameters it activates based on what the task requires — 1 billion for simpler operations, up to 4 billion for harder ones, all drawn from the 20-billion-parameter pool in flash.
The architecture paper is detailed on the memory design and sparse activation mechanism. It is less forthcoming on practical deployment constraints.
Apple’s profiling tools expose timing but not the metrics that decide production viability. “Energy, memory bandwidth, thermal? Not in the docs,” Marco Abis, who is building Ziraph, a profiler for local AI on Apple silicon, posted on X. “A notable gap, given those decide most of on-device performance.”
Abis also did not find a statement in Apple’s documentation — across the Core AI docs, the Foundation Models docs or the Private Cloud Compute security post — of when an on-device request transparently offloads, or whether that routing is visible to the developer or the user. For enterprises that need to document where inference runs, that is a direct compliance problem.
Not all the information is currently available. Apple has indicated a full technical report with benchmarks is coming later this summer.
Regulated industries evaluating agentic AI deployments now have a concrete architectural decision to make.
The DRAM wall for on-device agents just moved. Enterprises evaluating agents that need to run without a cloud round-trip now have a 20-billion-parameter local option to evaluate. The constraint shifts from model capability to device hardware.
The private/cloud boundary is now an architectural decision, not a default. Simpler requests stay on-device; complex agentic tasks route to AFM 3 Cloud Pro on Private Cloud Compute. Apple has not publicly specified when a request offloads or whether that routing is visible to the developer — a gap that complicates policy decisions for organizations that need to document where inference runs.
The agentic server tier depends on Google Cloud. AFM 3 Cloud Pro runs on Nvidia GPUs in Google Cloud. The Private Cloud Compute guarantee covers data privacy. It does not eliminate the Google Cloud dependency for server-side inference.
AFM 3 Core Advanced gives enterprises a 20-billion-parameter on-device option that did not exist before WWDC26. Whether it is deployable at scale depends on answers Apple has not yet published. Those details are due in the summer technical report.
It’s also rolling out a vehicle-to-grid firmware update.
GM shared two announcements today about its electric vehicle program. The most notable news for consumers is the launch of Energy Pass, a universal interface for public charging across multiple different brands’ stations. Tesla, Electrify America and IONNA will be supported at launch, with EVgo and ChargePoint to be added “soon.” Energy Pass will allow owners of GM EVs to take advantage of a larger percentage of the existing charging network in the US, as well as helping to easily find and pay for a vehicle’s electricity within a single app.
The second item is a firmware update that will bring full vehicle-to-grid functionality to GM Energy’s vehicle-to-home systems. As the name suggests, V2G means that an EV can contribute power back to the local electrical infrastructure. This development is for a more niche audience since it requires people to have the correct setup in their homes and a vehicle that supports this bidirectional charging. But for those customers, having an EV that can essentially act as a backup generator during a power outage is a welcome improvement.
Weekend Open Thread: Evereve – Corporette.com
Jensen Huang Approves Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron for NVIDIA (NVDA) HBM4 Memory Supply
Anatomy of the June crypto crash: Fed, Iran, Saylor
Trump Taps Housing Chief Bill Pulte as Acting Intelligence Director After Gabbard Exit
Senator Cynthia Lummis Calls CLARITY Act the Most Consequential Financial Legislation of This Generation
The Pain Points Taking a Fragile Tech Rally Down a Notch
The Best Mystery Series of All Time Is Surging on Streaming 30 Years After It Ended
Microsoft launches MXC, an OS-level sandbox for AI agents, with OpenAI and Nvidia already on board
Alexander Zverev wins the French Open to finally earn a 1st Grand Slam title
Microsoft unveils seven homegrown AI models in new bid for ‘long term self-sufficiency’
LBank Surpasses 25 Million Users Worldwide as AFA Partnership Continues to Drive Global Growth
PagerDuty, Inc. (PD) Presents at Bank of America 2026 Global Technology Conference Transcript
Suspicious Polyfill login prompts pop up on Toshiba, Muji websites
Trump’s AI Ownership Plan Could Benefit Anthropic at OpenAI’s Expense
Bangladesh beat Australia after 20 years in ODIs, register only their second win over six-time world champions | Cricket News
(VIDEO) Justin Bieber Delivers Surprise Happy Birthday Serenade to Diners at Los Angeles Mexican Restaurant
RCS Messages Between iPhone and Android Get End-to-End Encryption With iOS 26.5
Meta steals a tactic from Tesla and builds data centers in tents
Eli Lilly (LLY) Stock Surges 4% Following Breakthrough Sleep Apnea Trial Results
Hackers now exploit SolarWinds Serv-U flaw to crash servers
You must be logged in to post a comment Login