Amazon completely revamped its Kindle family in October when it debuted the entirely new Colorsoft ereader along with updated generations of the other three existing models: the standard Kindle, the Paperwhite and the Scribe E Ink tablet. The new Paperwhite has a slightly larger screen, a bigger battery and a more powerful processor that Amazon combined with E Ink tech to make page turns faster. This Paperwhite again comes in a Signature Edition, which adds wireless charging, an auto-adjusting front light and extra storage — all for $200, which is $10 more than the previous Signature Edition.
The standard Kindle also got a $10 price bump, leaving the same $90 gap between Amazon’s cheapest model and the Signature Edition. I tested both to see whether the price difference between the two is worth it. The higher-end model is certainly posh, but the base model handles ereader basics well. Is the deluxe treatment that much better?
Amazon/Engadget
The Kindle Paperwhite Signature Edition is one of the most luxe ereaders you can buy, but some may not need to pay extra for all the nice-to-have features.
Advertisement
Pros
Screen displays crisp text with a lovely warm light
Flush-front screen and soft-touch back feel premium
Noticeably faster page turns and scrolling
Auto-adjusting warm front light is helpful
Cons
Power button on the bottom edge is easy to accidentally trigger
Can’t adjust touch screen controls
Fewer page and font adjustments than the competition
The features exclusive to the Signature aren’t essential
The company is calling the Paperwhite (Signature and standard) the “fastest Kindle ever” thanks to a new dual-core processor and an oxide thin-film transistor layer that enables quicker switching of the text and graphics on the page. That layer is also more transparent than the previous tech, so the on-page clarity has increased as well.
As for storage, the Paperwhite Signature gets 32GB, double that of the regular Paperwhite, which is the same treatment as the prior generations for both. They have a couple additional backlights this time: ten standard LEDs and nine warm ones for a total of 19.
The screen is a little larger at seven inches, up from 6.8, and sports the same 300 ppi resolution. Despite a larger battery capacity (with an estimated 12 weeks of live instead of just ten), the device is a fraction of a millimeter thinner than last time, and weighs just two-tenths of a gram more. It has the same IPX8 rating, meaning it can handle full submersion, and the back is made from a metallic plastic with a rubberized texture that’s easy to grip (so you’re less likely to accidentally dunk it in water). The bezels help with grip too, as they’re just wide enough to accommodate a thumb without triggering a page turn.
Advertisement
The hardware upgrades are subtle, but they add up to a downright elegant way to read books. Pulling up menus, opening new titles and turning pages are all speedier than any ereader I’ve tried. And ghosting is basically non-existent. The roomy screen displays text that’s crisper than a January morning and the auto-adjusting front lights are like a warm lantern lighting your way.
If I take any issue with the design of the Signature, it’s the placement of the power button at the bottom edge. One of the simple joys in this life (for me anyway) is eating while reading. That means I hold a book or ereader on the table in front of my plate as I shovel stir fry into my mouth. Often, resting the Signature on the bottom edge accidentally presses the power button, shutting off my read mid-forkful. Notably, this doesn’t happen with the standard Kindle, even though the button is in the same place, simply because the smaller ereader isn’t heavy enough to trigger the button-press. The Signature also has a rubber grommet around the edge of the flush-front screen, which I don’t hate, but I do find myself distractedly fidgeting with it when I read.
Touch controls and customization
I sat the Paperwhite Signature next to other ereaders in my testing collection and compared the page-turn speeds, menu load times and scrolling refresh rates. Though the differences weren’t significant, the Signature was definitely faster. (But the Kobo Libra Colour is still the fastest at waking up after a sleep of longer than a few minutes.)
The Signature’s touch response is impeccable. I’ve accepted the fact that most ereader screens occasionally need an extra tap before they do what I want. Whether that’s turning a page or pulling up a menu, my first gesture sometimes goes unnoticed. Not here; the screen immediately responds to every swipe and tap I make. Unfortunately, sometimes that tap is unintentional, and other times the screen doesn’t respond the way I want — but it always responds.
Advertisement
That leads me to a couple of disappointments in the Paperwhite’s interface. Those misinterpreted taps were almost always page turns. The area that skips back in your reading is a narrow sliver on the left-hand side. Some people may plow forward in a book with no backwards glances, but I often find myself at the top of a new page with the realization that I’d been thinking about toast or Cristin Milioti for most of the last page and have no idea what’s going on. Then, when I tap to go back, I’m often taken forward, which confuses me more. To be fair, swipes are generally accurate — but I’m a tapper not a swiper.
This wouldn’t be a problem if the area for a back tap were wider — but you can’t adjust that. In fact, you can’t adjust the way your taps and swipes work at all. The middle of the top of the page accesses the header menu and a swipe down from the top brings up the quick settings panel. There’s no switching those gestures or the zones to suit your preference.
It’s unfortunate because that’s something both Kobo and Boox devices can do. Those readers also give you finer adjustments for the margins, line spacing, font weight and more. The options the Kindle does provide for the look of your text are honestly fine, though. And the Kindle gets points for letting you create and save themes made up of different combinations of fonts and layouts. Kobo doesn’t allow this and Boox can’t do it in its native reader app.
Buying, borrowing and listening to books
Acquiring books you want to read is maybe one of the most important qualities in an ereader and Kindles have their strengths and weaknesses. These features aren’t unique to the Paperwhite, but it’s worth mentioning how Amazon’s book access compares to its competitors. The first thing to acknowledge is that the Amazon Kindle library is the largest, thanks to Amazon Exclusive books and self-published, Kindle Direct Publishing (KDP) titles. That said, if you mostly read titles from established publishers, you’ll find them on any reader.
Advertisement
Amazon’s devices are better for people who like to flit between reading and listening to a given book. Not only do you get a discount on an audiobook if you buy the ebook version, the Whispersync feature keeps track of where you are so you can swap between the formats and pick up the story at the right place. And if you’re active on Goodreads, a Kindle will also serve you better as the integration with (the Amazon-owned) site is baked-in.
What Kindles don’t support are ePubs with any digital rights management (DRM) other than its own. If you buy a book from a third party ebook store that uses Adobe DRM, you can’t read it on a Kindle — but you can on Kobo and Boox devices (with a few extra steps). Finally, you may want to consider how you’ll access books borrowed from your local library. Using either the Libby app on your phone or your local library’s website, you just need to choose the “send to Kindle” option for them to show up on your reader. It’s worth noting that Kobo lets you search for and borrow library books from the device itself, and Boox devices let you do so from the Libby app directly.
How the Signature compares to the regular Paperwhite and base Kindle
The regular Paperwhite is $160 and the Signature Edition is $200. That’s a $40 increase that may make sense for some, but probably not for most people. The three add-ons (extra storage, wireless charging and auto-adjusting light) are handy, but won’t dramatically improve your reading experience. If you like having offline access to lots of audiobooks, the larger 32GB capacity might be worth it. But if you mostly read ebooks (and/or use your phone for audiobooks, which makes more sense to me), the 16GB-capacity should be more than enough for years of library expansion.
The auto-adjusting front light on the Signature Edition is responsive and calibrates the light to the environment pretty well. I still need to manually lower it in a fully dark room, so it’s not fully hands-off, plus it’s easy enough to adjust. The separate warm light (which you get with the regular Paperwhite) is the more critical feature anyway, as it makes reading into the wee hours of the night far more pleasant. The final Signature-only feature, wireless charging, is probably the least important — you only charge these things once every other month at the most. How you do so feels inconsequential.
Advertisement
So if you save $40 by not going with the Signature model, does it make sense to save even more by going with the $110 standard Kindle? That’s harder to answer. The base Kindle has the same 300 ppi resolution, the same storage capacity, the same font and layout options and access to the same audio- and ebooks as the standard Paperwhite. But the Kindle’s screen is smaller, the device is not waterproof, the battery lasts half as long and there’s no warm light. Touch responsiveness isn’t quite as good and page turns are slightly slower (though the difference on both counts is minor).
Honestly, the lack of a warm light on the base Kindle is the only major drawback. It’s far more enjoyable to read the softer yellowish screens of either Paperwhite than the harsher blue of the base model. But I found myself getting used to it fairly quickly, and I probably noticed the difference most when switching back and forth between the two — something most people won’t do.
Wrap-up
In short, the Kindle Paperwhite and the new Paperwhite Signature offer a more premium reading experience. The flush front screen and soft-touch back feel more upscale. The larger screen feels like the difference between reading a mass market paperback and a trade paperback, which isn’t to say the standard Kindle feels cramped, it’s just smaller. I see the Paperwhite (especially the Signature model) appealing to people who want the most elevated reading experience — the crispest text, the least lag, the swankiest feel. And the regular Kindle is perfect for those who just want the most direct line to reading nearly any book they want.
It comes down to whether you think a heightened experience will make you read more. If so, then it’s probably worth the price jump in the long run. But if you’re just looking for a no-frills way to read books, go for the base Kindle. Even though it’s less high-end, it feels more durable and more portable. The smaller size can fit in a back pocket and you may be more apt to toss it in a cluttered bag — all of which may very well mean you read more, and, really, that’s the whole point of any ereader.
Strands is the NYT’s latest word game after the likes of Wordle, Spelling Bee and Connections – and it’s great fun. It can be difficult, though, so read on for my Strands hints.
SPOILER WARNING: Information about NYT Strands today is below, so don’t read on if you don’t want to know the answers.
Your Strands expert
Advertisement
Your Strands expert
Marc McLaren
NYT Strands today (game #247) – hint #1 – today’s theme
What is the theme of today’s NYT Strands?
• Today’s NYT Strands theme is… More than just sports
NYT Strands today (game #247) – hint #2 – clue words
Play any of these words to unlock the in-game hints system.
Advertisement
BEAT
DART
CHAT
MARE
DARE
STORE
NYT Strands today (game #247) – hint #3 – spangram
What is a hint for today’s spangram?
• In the club
NYT Strands today (game #247) – hint #4 – spangram position
What are two sides of the board that today’s spangram touches?
First: left, 4th row
Last: right, 3rd row
Right, the answers are below, so DO NOT SCROLL ANY FURTHER IF YOU DON’T WANT TO SEE THEM.
NYT Strands today (game #247) – the answers
The answers to today’s Strands, game #247, are…
Advertisement
BAND
CHOIR
DRAMA
DEBATE
YEARBOOK
ORCHESTRA
SPANGRAM: AFTERSCHOOL
My rating: Moderate
My score: 6 hints
Well, this was a disaster. I needed six hints to solve today’s Strands, which means I needed hints for every single answer bar the spangram, which I got at the end when there were no other words that could possibly fit. And really I had no idea what the theme was until very late on.
Sign up to be the first to know about unmissable Black Friday deals on top tech, plus get all your favorite TechRadar content.
Part of the problem was that in the UK, where I am, several of these AFTERSCHOOL activities are not common – or at least have different names. I’ve never seen the likes of BAND, YEARBOOK or ORCHESTRA listed among my kids’ after-school activities, anyway. DEBATE, CHOIR and DRAMA are there – plus dozens of sports and many other activities – but I didn’t put them together to make the theme.
Yesterday’s NYT Strands answers (Monday, 4 November, game #246)
TICK
MINUTE
JIFFY
FLASH
MOMENT
SECOND
MOMENT
INSTANT
SPANGRAM: SMALLTIME
What is NYT Strands?
Strands is the NYT’s new word game, following Wordle and Connections. It’s now out of beta so is a fully fledged member of the NYT’s games stable and can be played on the NYT Games site on desktop or mobile.
I’ve got a full guide to how to play NYT Strands, complete with tips for solving it, so check that out if you’re struggling to beat it each day.
Apple is asking its employees how they feel about smart glasses as the tech giant considers entering the fledgling market, according to the latest report from the prominent Apple tipster Mark Gurman.
Citing people with knowledge of the matter, Gurman said on Monday that Apple has started gathering feedback from employees in focus groups organized by the company’s Product Systems Quality team, which is part of Apple’s hardware engineering division.
In a leaked email to select employees based at the company’s headquarters in California, the team wrote: “Testing and developing products that all can come to love is very important to what we do at Apple. This is why we are looking for participants to join us in an upcoming user study with current market smart glasses.”
Gurman said it’s not unusual for Apple to use internal focus groups when considering whether to enter a new market, as it can gain valuable feedback while keeping its plans secret, though as in this case, there’s always a chance that such activities may leak.
Advertisement
This is just the latest in a string of reports suggesting that Apple is moving closer toward the idea of building a pair of smart glasses designed to take on Meta’s Ray-Ban glasses, which have a built-in camera for taking photos and videos, and also let wearers make calls, listen to audio content, and ask an AI assistant questions. A recent update added the ability to send voice messages, and have the device read out incoming ones. At a special event in September, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg revealed that his team is developing a pair of smart specs with immersive augmented-reality capabilities for future release.
Considering how Apple is struggling to make a success of its larger and clunkier — and pricey at $3,499 — Vision Pro mixed-reality headset, the company is sure to exercise a great deal of caution when moving ahead with any plan for smart glasses, especially as the market for the device continues to be pretty niche.
And as Gurman said in his report, if the feedback from employees is positive enough to prompt Apple to pursue the project, its smart glasses are still likely to be “years away” from launch.
A new update has rolled out for the Pixel Screenshots app. The latest update essentially makes “All screenshots” redundant, tweaks carousels, and adds new shortcuts.
Google updates Pixel Screenshots app after the October Feature Drop
Last month, Google rolled out the October Feature Drop for Pixel smartphones. With the update, Google essentially unleashed its Gemini Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen AI) within the Pixel Screenshots app. Devices from the Pixel 6, going all the way up to the latest Pixel 9 Pro, will be eligible for the October Feature Drop.
Pixel device users eligible for the update will be able to use the power of Gen AI with the app to look for content. Specifically, Google announced how users could append “in Screenshots” to any command to “help you find something you saved in Pixel Screenshots, from wherever you are on your phone.” Gemini would essentially scrub through the images and look for context and content users asked.
The Pixel Screenshots app is now getting another update. It is currently available on the Play Store. Pixel Screenshots v0.24.373.08 brings with it several UI tweaks and improvements.
Advertisement
Google dumps “All screenshots”, and improves the ability to quickly glance at images
The Pixel Screenshots app’s homepage has two carousels for Reminders and Collections. These segments then have a grid for all the captured screenshots. Previously, users had the ability to get a full-screen “All screenshots” view.
The latest update for the Pixel Screenshots app reportedly removes the dedicated All Screenshots page. Instead, Google has placed the grid density options directly on the main screen.
Moving forward, users have the option to switch between four or three squares. Additionally, there are two rectangular previews, which offer an easily glanceable look. Needless to say, this eliminates the step of tapping on the “All screenshots” view and then adjusting grid density.
Google also replaced the “Select screenshots” option in the Collections view with an FAB (Floating Action Button). The “Edit title” and “Delete” options are now in the overflow menu.
Advertisement
The update also introduces app shortcuts that let users quickly “Take a photo” and “Add an image” right from your home screen. Users need not even head over to the FAB for these actions.
Google has also truncated long transcriptions/descriptions. This means the “Add a note” field or “Add to collection” options are easily available without having to scroll to the end of the text.
Portable Bluetooth speakers are always a good option to pick up for a special someone (or yourself) when early Black Friday tech deals start to pop up. One model worth paying attention in the sales is the JBL Clip 5, which has dropped to an all-time-low price of $50. That’s 30 bucks off the regular price.
We often recommend JBL products in our buying guides, such as our ones on the best portable Bluetooth speakers and best travel gifts. They’re by and large durable devices that deliver ample volume for the beach or a cookout, for instance (but maybe don’t use it on public transit if you don’t want to risk the ire of your fellow passengers).
JBL
The JBL Clip 5 has dropped to an all-time-low price of $50. The small, portable clip-on Bluetooth speaker should come in handy for your next cookout or beach trip.
As the name suggests, the JBL Clip 5 has a built-in carabiner, making it a cinch to attach to a backpack or belt loop, to name a couple of options. JBL said it redesigned the carabiner this time around to make the opening wider. As such, it’ll be easier to attach the speaker to a wider range of things.
Although the speaker measures just 1.75 inches, it’s said to deliver solid audio with punchy bass and a maximum output of seven watts. The JBL Clip 5 should be durable as well, since it has a IP67 waterproof and dustproof rating.
It’s claimed that the speaker will run for up to 12 hours on a single charge but there’s a Playtime Boost option that adds up to three extra hours of listening time. In addition, you can pair two Clip 5s for stereo audio or connect the speaker to other Auracast-enabled models from JBL to boost the sound.
Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More
We’ve known it for some time, but now it’s certain: the generative AI race is as much a contest for developers as it is for end-users.
Case-in-point: today, Elon Musk’s xAI, the spinoff startup of the social network X that uses its data to train new large language models (LLMs) such as the Grok family, today announced its application programming interface (API) is now open to the public and with it comes $25 free per month in API credits through the end of the year.
Given it’s already November, that’s just 2 months worth of free credits, or $50 total.
Advertisement
Musk previously announced the xAI API was open in beta three weeks ago to the date, but apparently uptake was not enough for his liking, hence the added incentive of free dev credits.
Is $25 per month with 2 months remaining really that much of a carrot?
It doesn’t sound like much coming from the world’s wealthiest man and multi-billionaire, and it’s not really on a per user basis nor in aggregate, but it may be enough to entice some developers to at least check out xAI’s tools and platform for building apps atop of the Grok models.
Also, from my brief test of the xAPI, I was only able to access grok-beta and text only, no image generation capabilities such as those found on Grok 2 (powered by Black Forest Labs’ Flux.1 model).
New Grok models coming soon
According to xAI’s blog post, this is actually “a preview of a new Grok model that is currently in the final stages of development,” and a new Grok “vision model will be available next week.”
In addition, xAI notes that the grok-beta supports “function calling,” or the ability for the LLM to take commands from a user and access functions of other connected apps and services, even executing them on the user’s behalf (if the connected app allows such access).
Advertisement
Compatible with the competition
Furthermore, the xAI account on the social network X posted that the xAI API is “compatible with OpenAI & Anthropic SDKs,” or the software development kits of different web tools used by developers of those platforms, meaning it should be relatively easy to switch out those models for grok-beta or others on the xAI platform.
Musk’s xAI recently switched on its “Colossus” supercluster of 100,000 Nvidia H100 GPUs in Memphis, Tennessee, which is being used to train its new models — the largest or one of the largest in the world — so apparently that facility is already hard at work.
What do you think? Is it enough to get the developers out in the VentureBeat audience to try building atop xAI? Let me know: carl.franzen@venturebeat.com.
VB Daily
Advertisement
Stay in the know! Get the latest news in your inbox daily
The end of zero-interest rates has driven companies to look for savings wherever they can, but one area continues to be a major budget drain. Observability — collecting and understanding data and systems — typically remains an organization’s second-highest cloud expenditure, right after cloud provisioning itself. People have even gone so far as to talk of an observability cost crisis, underscored by anecdotes like Coinbase spending $65 million on its Datadog bill.
And why is observability so pricey and important? Complex cloud architectures and microservices are here to stay, and with security issues and service outages all too common, ops teams need observability data to keep systems running.
Now a startup called Dash0 is launching to address the cost issue — if not by being cheaper, then by at least making buying and paying for their services easier.
Dash0 — pronounced “Dash-zero” — is a Datadog competitor whose pitch doesn’t revolve around drastically lowering observability costs. Founder Mirko Novakovic (left in the picture above) still expects companies to spend 10% to 20% of cloud costs on this budget item. But he and his team want to improve transparency, both in terms of pricing and of observability itself.
Advertisement
Dash0 says it can do this by way of how it’s built, by fully leveraging the open source observability framework OpenTelemetry (aka OTel), Novakovic told TechCrunch, which includes a feature called Semantic conventions that allows someone, “at any given time, [to] see exactly which service or which developer or which application creates how much cost on the observability side,” he said.
There are other companies, such as Signoz, that describe themselves as OTel-native, but Dash0’s positioning has resonated with investors. It raised a $9.5 million seed funding round led by Accel, with participation from Dig Ventures, the investment firm of MulesSoft founder Ross Mason.
Novakovic’s track record may have also helped. His previous company, Instana, also backed by Accel, was acquired by IBM at the end of 2020 for $500 million, a price that has never been publicly disclosed before now. Several other Instana alums are also now part of the Dash0 team.
If Dash0 is built on OTel, it’s also trying to improve it. The framework has actually been around since 2019, but “it is not that easy to use at the moment,” Novakovic said. “Vendors have to do a lot of work in making sure that it gets at least as easy as installing a Datadog agent. That’s where we are still lagging behind the proprietary folks.”
Advertisement
As a company, Dash0 hopes to unlock OTel’s benefits — vendor-agnostic standardized data — but with an intuitive UI, dashboards, and integrations with Slack, email and other tools. Its initial target customers are companies that have between 50 and 5,000 employees.
The company is now launching publicly, but it won’t heavily invest in sales and marketing until it is sure it has hit product-market fit. In the meantime, Novakovic said, its resources will go toward growing the tech and product side of its team, which now consists of 21 people, of whom 19 are engineers, all working remotely.
Its next 10 hires will include a developer relations specialist who will also contribute to driving the adoption of OpenTelemetry as a solid alternative to proprietary options. On that front, the company intends to work with other OTel-related startups while making sure that “missing parts” like dashboards and query languages fall into place with projects like Perses and PromQL. “That’s a community effort together with the customers,” Novakovic said.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login