Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Bitcoin Rebounds Above $76K, but Analysts See Cycle Bottom Much Lower

Published

on

Analysts Explain Why Bitcoin and Altcoins Crashed


Doctor Profit revised Bitcoin’s projected cycle bottom lower, and now expects a final low between $54,000 and $44,000.

Crypto markets experienced another bout of forced selling over the past 24 hours, which pushed Bitcoin (BTC) briefly toward $74,000 before rebounding above $76,800. The asset is down 13% over the past week.

Market data cited by analysts now suggest a deeper bear market and a lower projected cycle bottom.

Advertisement

Deeper Cycle Lows

Prominent crypto analyst Doctor Profit has revised his expectations for Bitcoin’s cycle bottom, lowering his projected price range to between $54,000 and $44,000.

He explained that the recent decline coincided with a critical technical development. Doctor Profit found that Bitcoin lost the 100-week moving average (MA100 Weekly), which he describes as a crucial indicator that separates bull and bear market conditions. He points out that BTC’s break above this same moving average in October 2023 was the confirmation of the previous bull market. He argued that losing it again, two years later, and in line with the broader market cycle, points to a transition into a bear market.

Doctor Profit also cited the emergence of a death cross as further confirmation, and stated that this setup is very similar to the market structure seen during the 2021-2022 cycle peak and subsequent downturn. He even went on to add that the move below the MA100 Weekly was sharp and decisive, and that it also represents a confirmed breakdown from a bearish flag pattern he has referenced repeatedly over recent weeks.

Looking ahead, the analyst expects Bitcoin to close the coming week below the MA100 Weekly, enter another consolidation phase, and then continue lower toward a $70,000 target, which he believes is not the cycle bottom. While he previously projected a bottom in the $50,000-$60,000 range, an outlook he first shared when Bitcoin was trading between $115,000 and $125,000, he now said that updated models point to even lower levels.

Advertisement

Based on his recalculations, Doctor Profit placed the new bottom zone between $54,000 and $44,000, calling this range the most likely area for the true cycle low. He also flagged the asset’s drop below Strategy’s average entry price of around $76,000 as an additional source of risk, and argued that this development could intensify fear and panic in the market.

You may also like:

A significant portion of Strategy’s Bitcoin was acquired using leverage, and the firm’s stock, used as collateral, has been declining. This has made stabilization more difficult with BTC below the firm’s cost basis. Doctor Profit also added that Strategy’s overall Bitcoin position is now roughly flat on a profit-and-loss basis, while emphasizing that no profits were ever taken.

He even warned that additional fear could be driven by external narratives, including speculation linked to the release of Epstein-related files, which he says may fuel emotional selling regardless of their validity.

BTC May Need a New Narrative

Further adding to the bearish outlook, Matrixport’s recent market update shed light on weakening demand from traditional finance investors through spot Bitcoin ETFs. According to the firm, Bitcoin ETFs have recorded three consecutive months of net outflows, even as many US wealth managers have only recently enabled client access to these products.

Advertisement

It found that the last month of meaningful inflows occurred in July, and a brief resurgence in October, but overall momentum has deteriorated since the summer. This slowdown has continued despite a strong rally in gold and the continuation of the broader de-dollarization theme. As a result, Matrixport stated that BTC may need a new or refreshed narrative before a durable bottom forms and renewed interest from traditional investors emerges.

SPECIAL OFFER (Exclusive)

SECRET PARTNERSHIP BONUS for CryptoPotato readers: Use this link to register and unlock $1,500 in exclusive BingX Exchange rewards (limited time offer).

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Oil, silver trading is way more popular than XRP, SOL on Hyperliquid

Published

on

Hyperliquid's perpetual rankings. (Hyperliquid)

Traders on decentralized exchange Hyperliquid are favoring traditional commodities like oil and silver, trading them more aggressively than crypto tokens such as XRP (XRP) and solana (SOL).

Perpetual futures contracts tied to crude oil benchmarks WTI and Brent have recorded a combined trading volume of over $500 million in the past 24 hours. The silver contract alone accounted for more than $412 million in trades.

By trading activity, oil and silver contracts now far outpace SOL and XRP perps, which posted $176 million and $31 million in volume, respectively. For context, both XRP and SOL have multibillion-dollar market caps and rank among the world’s largest cryptocurrencies.

This trend comes as commodities have turned highly volatile amid the ongoing Iran conflict, which has disrupted crude supply through the strategic Strait of Hormuz — a critical chokepoint for roughly 20% of global oil shipments. It underscores Hyperliquid’s emergence as a go-to platform for price discovery in commodities, especially over weekends when traditional markets are closed.

Advertisement
Hyperliquid's perpetual rankings. (Hyperliquid)
Hyperliquid’s perpetual rankings. (Hyperliquid)

Brent and WTI crude prices have surged more than 45% this month, the kind of returns typically seen in memecoins. The rally has pushed oil above $100 a barrel, sending inflationary shocks worldwide and drawing renewed attention to commodities as a sector of interest amid heightened geopolitical and market risks.

The uncertainty shows no signs of abating, suggesting Hyperliquid’s energy markets could continue to see heavy activity and potentially challenge bitcoin and ether’s dominance. Perpetual contracts tied to the two tokens still remain the most traded on the exchange, posting 24-hour volumes of $1.94 billion and $990 million, respectively.

Iran said early Monday that the Strait of Hormuz would be “completely closed” immediately if the U.S. follows up on President Donald Trump’s threat to attack its power plants.

The stark warning came after Trump said the U.s. would obliterate Iran’s power plans if Tehran fails to fully allow oil tankers to pass through the Strait within 48 hours.

In the meantime, analysts at investment banking giant Goldman Sachs have lifted their oil price forecasts amid the ongoing supply disruption.

Advertisement

They now see the Brent crude averaging $100 a barrel over March-April, up from a prior forecast of $98, and implying a roughly 62% premium to their full‑year 2025 outlook. The bank also revised its full‑year 2026 Brent average higher to $85 a barrel, while maintaining a robust $80 average for 2027.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Resolv stablecoin drops 70% after $80 million exploit after attacker mints USR

Published

on

(CoinDesk)

A stablecoin is supposed to be worth a dollar. Resolv’s USR is worth 27 cents and the math to fix it doesn’t work.

Resolv Labs confirmed over the weekend that a malicious actor gained unauthorized access to protocol infrastructure through a compromised private key and minted approximately $80 million in uncollateralized USR. The team paused smart contracts and burned roughly 9 million of the illicitly minted tokens, but the damage was already done.

Unlike smart contract bugs that can be patched, key compromises are infrastructure failures that no amount of code auditing can prevent.

Current USR supply consists of 102 million pre-incident tokens plus approximately 71 million illicitly minted tokens that are still circulating. The protocol holds roughly $95 million in assets as of Monday morning, down from $141 million cited in Resolv’s initial statement as redemptions drain what’s left.

Against total liabilities of approximately $173 million in outstanding USR, that’s a collateralization ratio of roughly 55%.

(CoinDesk)

If pre-incident USR holders redeem first, which is what Resolv is facilitating through an allowlist process targeting March 23, the $95 million in assets gets absorbed by the 102 million in legitimate USR. That’s roughly 93 cents on the dollar for those who get through the door.

USR is trading at $0.27 on CoinGecko, down 72% over the past week and 61% in the past 24 hours alone. The 24-hour range stretched from $0.14 to $0.82, reflecting chaotic trading as the market tried to price in the exploit’s severity. Daily volume hit $8.4 million against a market cap of just $54 million, meaning a significant chunk of the remaining supply changed hands in a single day.

Advertisement

DeFiLlama data shows Resolv’s TVL peaked near $684 million in February 2025 before declining through the year to around $95 million pre-exploit. The protocol had raised $10 million in funding and was generating roughly $5.28 million in annualized fees. That revenue stream is now effectively dead.

Ledger CTO Charles Guillemet said in an X post that the exploit “will create bad debt on some lending markets, particularly in specific pools,” flagging that some Morpho pools using USR as collateral had already been exited.

Resolv said the underlying collateral was not directly compromised and that the attack came through “unauthorized third-party actions, including a targeted infrastructure compromise and cyberattack.” The team said it was working with law enforcement and onchain analytics firms and would “pursue all available avenues to recover assets.”

Advertisement

The protocol strongly advised against trading USR or related Resolv tokens while recovery measures are being implemented, adding that “actions of users during post-exploit period may affect the recovery,” a line that suggests trading could complicate any future claims process.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Blockchain Messaging Adoption Rising in Line With Global Unrest

Published

on

Blockchain Messaging Adoption Rising in Line With Global Unrest

Decentralized, blockchain-based messaging and social media apps saw a surge of interest over the last year amid civil unrest and communication blackouts in the Middle East, Asia and Africa. 

Search interest in decentralized social media has grown 145% over the last five years, according to Exploding Topics, while decentralized peer-to-peer messaging service Bitchat saw a spike in downloads during protests in Madagascar, Uganda, Nepal, Indonesia and Iran in recent months.

Search interest in decentralized social media has spiked in the last five years. Source: Exploding Topics

“I think people are starting to trust open protocols more than they trust closed companies,” Shane Mac, the CEO of XMTP Labs, told Cointelegraph in a recent interview.  

XMTP Labs is a startup focused on building decentralized communication technology. Mac said that unrest around the world is pushing people to explore decentralized messaging options and think more about privacy.

WhatsApp, the messaging app owned by social media giant Meta, said in February that Russia had moved forward with its block on the app, making it inaccessible without a VPN or similar workaround.

Advertisement

“The last 15 years have been centralized, and the next 15 are going to decentralize. When you see an entire country shut down single apps, it tells you that there has to be a new foundation that we need to go build on,” added Mac. 

“Open source is having a moment. Open protocols, open financial systems, open communication protocols, open identity standards. It’s going to be a really cool next era of the internet as decentralization and open standards come back.”

No single point of failure 

Mac said decentralized networks can provide a safe harbor during turmoil as they’re typically harder to shut down without a single point of failure.

Decentralized platforms are generally hosted across networks spanning multiple countries, with servers managed by their participants. 

In comparison, centralized options run on a single collection of servers controlled by one entity or company, which can be blocked and taken offline more easily. 

Advertisement