Liam Shrivastava won the Lewisham mayoral election for the Green Party by a landslide and has pledged to stand in solidarity with Palestinians who are suffering under the ongoing genocide. Moreover, his principled commitments have the potential to provide a blueprint for how ordinary people can take on huge injustice at a local level.

Pointing to local investment in Israel’s genocide in Gaza through pension funds managed by Labour councils, which in turn financially empower the Zionist regime, Shrivastava made clear his intention to challenge and dismantle the sinister, cynical relationship maintained by Starmer’s Labour.

Given the huge sums of money ‘donated’ to Starmer and his cabinet of Zionist stooges, this challenge within the London region itself will undoubtedly result in a fair bit of upset in Downing Street.

However, that should simply be seen as a reason to push forward as our government has been complicit in this genocide all along.

“We would like to explore twinning with a Palestinian town.”

The new Green mayor of Lewisham Liam Shrivastava tells #TimesRadio he is “very keen” to show solidarity with the people of Palestine. pic.twitter.com/Qid2rbNY8F

— Times Radio (@TimesRadio) May 9, 2026

Green Party breaks Labour Party ‘era of dominance’

These polarised local elections have been a particularly fraught and emotional time for everyone involved — voters and candidates alike. Yet the results have brought renewed hope to many across the electorate, as communities chose hope and solidarity over hate and vitriolic division. After all, Lewisham has provided a shining example of what a forward-thinking community can achieve.

The area has long been a Labour stronghold, with the former party of the working class controlling the local council since 1971. However, that dominance has now been defeated, with Greens seeing 40 councillors elected to a measly 14 won by Starmer’s Labour. Moreover, despite other elections being very tight between populist parties Reform and the Green Party, Shrivastava absolutely wiped the floor with both Labour and Reform even further behind.

This only proves compassion and decency can truly defeat the vindictive politics of superiority and supremacy pushed by far-right, billionaire-funded Reform UK.

In the mayoral election, Shrivastava secured a whopping 35,265 votes affording him 40.4% of the vote share. Incumbent Labour received 30,374 with 34.8%, and Reform way down at the bottom with just 7,288, appealing to just 8.4% of the local population.

A grand total of 40 Green councillors elected in Lewisham to work with Mayor @LiamShrivastava pic.twitter.com/hQ8g48TulR

— The Green Party (@TheGreenParty) May 9, 2026

Shrivastava: ‘punished for trying to encourage the pension committee to divest away from the genocide’

Sure to reinforce that renewed hope is the new Green Mayor’s commitment, from day one, to work to break local government ties with a genocidal state who has likely murdered hundreds of thousands and terrorised millions in Palestine.

Speaking to Times Radio, he first outlined how he would stop hard-working people’s money from benefitting Israel and its blood-soaked arms companies:

Within our manifesto, we have commitments around looking at our responsible investments policy when it comes to our pension funds. Obviously, we’ll be lobbying the London Collective Investment Vehicle to basically ensure that none of our pension funds are complicit with companies that are involved in the genocide. So that’s one of the things that we’re committed to.

Then he showed his commitment to solidarity, regardless of the borders and distance between us:

We also would like to explore twinning with a Palestinian town. A Labour Council, I believe Brent, have already done that. So that’s not an unusual thing for a county council to do. That’s certainly something that I’d be very keen to do.

But if we’re thinking about sort of statements and things like that, I remember when the genocide began, the former mayor of Lewisham, Damien Egan, put out a very partisan statement that was only talking about Israel, did not mention anything about the people suffering in Gaza. And that actually caused a great deal of harm in our community.

Going further, he highlighted that Labour had entirely abandoned this solidarity and commitment to international law – an unwelcome realisation that ultimately led him, and others, to leave the party themselves:

So many people in Lewisham were so angered by that. And, you know, this is one of the reasons why myself and other colleagues left the Labour Party. Because when we were speaking up about this, when we were trying to pass a ceasefire motion in our Labour group, a private setting, we were told that that was not permissible, that was not allowed. And even, you know, we were punished for trying to encourage the pension committee to divest away from the genocide.

So, yes, we will be very, very clearly stating our solidarity with the people of Palestine and, you know, those suffering oppression all around the world, in Sudan, in Iran, you know, all over the world. You know, all over the world, Ukraine, wherever.

Courageously taking on a pro-Israel establishment

The journalist tried to then challenge Shrivastava and suggested that these are pointless commitments in practice. Also, it’s curious to note how the journalist stopped short of providing any reason whatsoever as to why local people might be more “sympathetic to the Israeli cause”. Nevertheless, this new Mayor is clearly more than capable of managing these challenging, but highly necessary, conversations:

No, no, no. I mean, as elected representatives, as councillors and as mayor, I have a responsibility for all communities. And that includes obviously the Jewish community. I know that…

Because it’s about demonstrating that we are standing alongside justice. And whatever your views on this issue, it’s really important that we uphold international law. It’s really important that we don’t have investments complicit with these companies. And again, the reason why it’s important is because it’s important to so many of our residents. That’s why it’s important. We want to represent them.

And as I say, we would do it in a proper way, in a way that is inclusive towards all of our communities. We don’t want to create harm and division and things like that. We understand the importance of community cohesion.

Advertisement

I understand that as mayor, I have a responsibility to all communities. And as elected representatives, they also have responsibilities to think about how our actions, our statements, different things like that, how they can impact all our communities.

Lewisham Mayor Shrivastava finished, powerfully:

So, we’d always do it in a proper way and in a way that builds solidarity and a collective feeling. But most importantly, that we stand alongside justice and care.

Featured image via BBC

By Maddison Wheeldon

Source link

On 6 May, we reported that a Reform UK candidate suggested ‘melting Nigerians to fill potholes’. The man in question — Glenn Gibbins — is now an elected councillor. And Reform deputy Richard Tice is refusing to condemn what he said:

He keeps mentioning processes and vetting, why haven’t they sacked him?

— Zara Hussain (@zarahussain999) May 10, 2026

Reform’s Glenn Gibbins

This is what we reported on Gibbins:

The candidate in question is Glenn Gibbins. As Hope not Hate highlighted, Reform actually spelled his name wrong on the leaflets by referring to him as ‘Glen Gibbons’. This inability to correctly spell his name could be a simple mistake; it could be a further sign that Reform isn’t bothering to vet its candidates.

Given the things Gibbins has said, it would actually be better for the party if it came out that they didn’t vet him. The alternative is that they did, and they just didn’t see a problem with comments like this:

“Carnt believe amount of nigerians in town…..should melt them all down and fill in the pot holes!!”

Gibbins is clearly trying to be funny, but that doesn’t make what he said any better. If anything, it shows that he and the people he communicates with are so incredibly comfortable with racism that it’s all just a big joke to them.

This is possibly why he feels so at home in Reform. Because as we suspected, it looks like the party literally just doesn’t care about this sort of racism.

Supported with silence

The exchange between Kuenssberg and Tice played out as follows:

Laura Kuenssberg: I want to ask you about your party. One of your new Sunderland councillors – so a man who was elected to represent Reform – suggested melting Nigerians to fill potholes. Is that person, who’s expressed those views, somebody you are happy to see represent Reform?

Richard Tice: Laura, this weekend we are celebrating our incredible successes.

We’re not sure we’d consider the local elections an ‘incredible success’ if we’d managed to get Gibbins elected. And as we’ve reported, Gibbins is far from the only disgraceful candidate Reform just put into power:

So much more than a slip-up in vetting, Reform UK are allowing these men to run because they don't see anything wrong with what they did

Via @RachelCDailey_ https://t.co/lytLpNehTd

— Canary (@TheCanaryUK) May 8, 2026

Advertisement

Richard Tice: Like any party, you have internal party processes to look at where people have said or done the wrong thing.

Laura Kuenssberg: But do you condemn those remarks? 

Richard Tice: Laura… I condemn anything that is wrong and inappropriate.

Laura Kuenssberg: And is that wrong and inappropriate?

Richard Tice: The key point is voters have heard all of this smearing and this sneering against all of us and they voted for more Reform because they want action; they want delivery; they’re sick of the failures. of the Tories and Labour that have impoverished them because of mass immigration and because of net stupid zero. That’s what really winds people up.

As we’ve reported, Reform points at migrants to distract from their wealthy mates rinsing the country for billions. Some of these ‘mates’ are fossil fuel billionaires who want to halt our highly successful switch to renewable energy sources. This is despite the fact that switching is going to give us long-term energy security, meaning we’ll never again have to worry about traffic flow in the Strait of Hormuz.

In a video titled You’ve been lied to about Net Zero, Simon Clark says that people create misinformation around Net Zero as follows:

So these are the five steps of the anti-net zero playbook. Inflate the costs, ignore the cost of business as usual, ignore the operational savings, ignore the co- benefits, and most egregiously, ignore the costs of inaction. Not getting to net zero is going to cost the world much, much more

‘It’s not a smear’

Back to the interview:

Laura Kuenssberg: Richard Tyson, it’s not a smear to put to you comments made by one of the people who’s been elected for your party.

Richard Tice:  I’ve just said, we look at all these things… Of course. But the reality is voters are furious with the failures of Labour, the failures of the Tories, and they’ve said we want more Reform, more success, more reducing backlog in SEND, in potholes, and they want Nigel to be the next elected Prime Minister of the United Kingdom.

‘Potholes’ probably wasn’t the ideal thing to mention here given Gibbins’ plan to fill them. Also, many ex-Reform councillors have said they struggled to manage local issues because Farage micro-managed them from Reform HQ.

Durham councillor Nick Brown said:

When we took control [of Durham Council], I believed the messages from Nigel Farage that we would make big changes for people living locally.

But really, whenever we had a local issue, we were told to follow the party line. Not to rock the boat, bring press attention on the council. We all turned into Nigel’s yes-men – ordered to be on best behaviour to help him get to power.

Advertisement

Reform — The home of racism

We reported on many vile Reform candidates in the runup to the local election, including the following:

• Reform activist worries growth of Jewish population could ruin UK culture.
• Calls for Reform candidate who praised rape of Sikh women to face suspension.
• Reform activist said ‘Hitler was right’.
• Reform welcomes ‘shoot the p*kis’ scandal ex-Tory.
• Video emerges of Reform’s ‘Nazi salute’ candidate drink driving.
• Reform’s chaotic collapse continues: Scottish candidate suspended over ‘financial conduct’.

It’s no mystery why these people think Reform is their home. It’s because senior politicians will go on the national broadcaster and give them cover.

Don’t be surprised when Glenn Gibbins turns out to be a less than competent politician anyway:

We’re happy to note that Glenn Gibbins has since been suspended pending investigation. Deputy leader of Durham County Council Darren Grimes said:

He’s been suspended and the party is investigating those very serious allegations and will act on them

Tice demonstrably as clueless as ever.

Featured image via BBC

By Willem Moore

Source link

The Champions League has reached the moment when the most coveted title will be decided, with the gap between dream and reality narrowing in a final that holds the hope of a first title for Arsenal, or a second in a row for Paris Saint-Germain.

In London, Arsenal wrote a new chapter in their season after securing their place in the final with a hard-fought 1-0 victory over Atlético Madrid on a raucous night at the Emirates Stadium. The Gunners’ return to the final comes for only the second time in their history, following their 2006 final defeat to Barcelona, but this time they look like a more mature side, and one even more hungry to lift the trophy.

In Munich, the action was no less thrilling. Paris Saint-Germain knew how to manage the game against Bayern Munich, settling for a 1-1 draw at the Allianz Arena, capitalising on their mad 5-4 first-leg victory in Paris to book their place in the final.

And so, the two sides are set to meet on 30 May in a final with a different flavour, bringing together two projects seeking to establish themselves at the pinnacle of European football.

Reaching this stage is not merely a passing achievement; it is every player’s greatest dream, the match that etches names into the annals of history. Yet behind this night lie long journeys forged by names accustomed to appearing in the final time and again.

Players with the most Champions League final appearances

According to data from Transfermarkt, Germany’s Toni Kroos tops the list of players with the most final appearances since the 1992/1993 season, having reached the final seven times, winning the title on six occasions with Bayern Munich and Real Madrid.

Close behind Kroos are four players who know the path to the trophy well, having played in six finals and won all six titles: Luka Modrić, Nacho Fernández, Dani Carvajal and Lucas Vázquez.

As for Cristiano Ronaldo, the competition’s all-time leading goalscorer, he has reached the final six times, lifting the trophy on five occasions and losing once with Manchester United, leaving his mark as one of the most influential players in the competition’s history.

The list continues with names that have made European history: David Alaba (four titles from six finals), Paolo Maldini and Alessandro Costacurta (three titles each with Milan), alongside Real Madrid’s golden generation: Casemiro, Gareth Bale,

Karim Benzema, Marcelo and Isco, who have won 5 titles from 5 finals.

As for Argentine star Lionel Messi, he is one of eight players to have reached the final four times, winning all of them.

Featured image via EUFA

By Alaa Shamali

Source link

Irish footballer James McLean has added his voice to the sporting and political calls to boycott Ireland’s matches against Israel in the UEFA Nations League.

According to a report published by The42ie, McLean, a Derry City player with 103 caps for the Republic of Ireland, criticised what he described as a lack of “courage” on the part of the Football Association of Ireland in dealing with the issue, arguing that the decision to play the match should not be left to the players.

McLean said in comments posted on his Instagram account that the players find themselves in a difficult position, given that representing the national team is an important opportunity for any player, but he stressed at the same time that:

the match should never have been played.

The Irish player added referring to the country’s political history and conflicts:

If there is one country that should understand the meaning of oppression and the suffering it causes, it is Ireland.

McLean’s comments come after the disclosure of an open letter sent by a group called “Stop The Game” to the Football Association of Ireland, calling on it to boycott the two matches against Israel in the UEFA Nations League.

Calls on Ireland to boycott the match with ‘Israel’

The Republic of Ireland and Israel are scheduled to meet twice in the 2026 UEFA Nations League, with the first fixture taking place on 27 September and the return leg on 4 October in the Irish capital, Dublin, amid growing political and sporting controversy in Ireland over calls to boycott the matches.

The list of signatories to the letter included a number of prominent figures in Irish football, amongst them Shamrock Rovers captain Roberto López, Bohemians player Dawson Devoy, St Patrick’s Athletic’s Joe Redmond, and Waterford’s Padraig Amond.

According to the report, the letter cited what it described as “ongoing violations” of European and international football regulations due to the participation of Israeli clubs on occupied Palestinian territory, as well as allegations of “apartheid and acts of genocide”.

In contrast, the Football Association of Ireland continues to reject calls for a boycott, justifying its position by citing its commitment to UEFA regulations and warning that failing to play the match could expose the national team to sporting sanctions, including relegation in the UEFA Nations League, as well as affecting its world ranking and chances of qualifying for future tournaments.

Sinn Fein complementary scarf

In a related development, Lynn Boylan, a Member of the European Parliament for the Sinn Féin, launched a special scarf for supporters of the Irish national team to express their opposition to the match against Israel.

Boylan presented the first scarf to Joanna Byrne, the former chair of Drogheda United, who was sacked from her post earlier this year after calling for a boycott of the match.

Boylan said that UEFA had previously taken the decision to ban Russia following its invasion of Ukraine, arguing that the time had come to take a similar stance towards Israel due to what she described as “the ongoing events in Gaza and the West Bank”.

Featured image via AlJazeera

By Alaa Shamali

Source link

Esther Webber’s journalism is about making power comprehensible – digging into how decisions are made and explaining them clearly to people who are not in the room. As part of our Women in Westminster series, we sat down with Webber to learn more about the intersection between our national politics and the wider world

As a journalist specialising in foreign affairs and defence, Esther Webber understands the challenge of navigating hidden and often opaque worlds. When Women in Westminster sat down with the POLITICO journalist, she told us this was also a skill she had to draw upon when she first joined the Westminster Lobby.

Advertisement

“There was definitely a slight feeling of you’re either in the know, or you’re not,” Webber tells us, reflecting on her early days in Westminster. “There were a lot of unwritten rules. They felt like they were designed to keep you out rather than to help you.”

Fortunately, the POLITICO correspondent thrives on understanding complexity. Just like the worlds she reports on, she understands Westminster as coded. It runs on relationships, conventions, and knowledge that often need to be painstakingly built by each new generation of MPs and journalists.  

The ability to identify the hidden structures that often sit behind the nation’s politics also informs Webber’s journalism. National security, foreign affairs, and intelligence are fields where decisions are often shaped behind closed doors. As POLITICO’s Senior Foreign and Defence Correspondent, her reporting routinely focuses on areas where information is difficult to access.

Advertisement

Webber likes to peer behind those closed doors. Finding and verifying information that is hidden or obscured seems to be something she truly embraces.  

“I am definitely a nosy person,” she laughs. “I enjoy trying to get into those nooks and crannies that actually can tell you how things really work and where power really lies.”

The forensic attention that Webber pays to “where power lies” results in reporting that extends far beyond the visible facts of what happened. In everything she writes, she is relentlessly interested in not just the “what” but the “why”.

“It is not just about reporting what happened,” she explains. “But stepping back to say, ‘Here is the dynamic behind that.’”

Advertisement

That deep curiosity is a cornerstone of Webber’s journalistic work. In the areas she covers, the surface facts rarely tell the full story. Reporting on national security brings particular constraints, with information tightly controlled and access depending on trusted relationships built over years, not months.

These are often hugely complex issues, but Webber remains aware that the audience she is speaking to extends far beyond SW1.  

“I often try to think, ‘how would I explain this story to a friend?’” she explains. “I’ve got a lot of friends who are politically engaged and want to know what’s happening, but they’re not in the minutiae of what happens every day in Westminster. They’re always really useful to tell me whether I’m making sense or whether I’ve gone down a really tedious rabbit hole.”

That clarity of explanation is something that Webber also admires in others, citing former Newsround presenter Julie Etchingham as a childhood influence. That sense of clarity informs Webber’s own writing, which always focuses on substance and precision rather than performance.

Advertisement

That approach, she argues, is increasingly important in an environment where there is a growing breakdown of trust across society.

“I do think trust in politics is pretty low at the moment,” she explains. “But trust in journalism is also in a difficult place. We have to try and do everything we can to improve our relationship so that people do feel that we’re showing them stuff for a reason.”

Webber is candid in not dismissing trust as “someone else’s problem.” She recognises that journalism itself needs to work to rebuild connections to the public.

That wider sense of mission and purpose is evident in other areas, too. Webber has been actively involved in work within Parliament to address wider issues of inclusion, giving evidence to the Modernisation Committee.

Advertisement

“I was talking specifically about accessing Parliament as a disabled person, which is a constant learning curve,” she tells us. “It’s always a good thing when people try to think about how Parliament works and could we do things differently, but in practice, it’s very, very hard to change.”

She is also clear that while some improvements are certainly overdue, wholesale change needs to be approached with caution. She explains that some older traditions have developed for specific reasons and removing them could have negative consequences. However, one area where she does believe there has been progress is in Westminster’s working culture.

“I think it has changed partly because there’s been a bit of a reckoning among MPs about their behaviour and their conduct,” she says. “And certain things have become less acceptable even in the time I’ve been there. So, I think it is changing.”

In part, she attributes this to the growing number of female journalists and MPs. However, she notes that in other areas progress has been slower.

Advertisement

“I think there are other areas of representation where it’s proved more of a challenge,” she says, highlighting the very small proportion of members of the Lobby from Black and minority ethnic, working-class, or non-traditional backgrounds.

Shifting that, she believes, requires structural change combined with directness rather than deference.

“I used to worry more about annoying people or putting people off,” she recalls from her early career. “But actually, often you’re trying to get the attention of people who are just really busy. They may want to help you, but they’ve just got a lot of competing demands. Be more annoying.”

It is said lightly, but Webber’s point is a serious one. In a system where access is limited and attention is scarce, being heard requires effort and persistence. Those appear to be qualities that she herself has in abundance.

Advertisement

Source link

On 9 May, we reported that little-known Labour MP Catherine West was threatening to challenge Keir Starmer for the Labour leadership. Since then, a lot of shit has hit a lot of different fans, with left-leaning politicians warning the proposal could lead to a coup for the Labour right. Among them is Richard Burgon, who has likened West’s plan to a “palace coup”:

Keir Starmer needs to go.

But not through a Cabinet stitch-up or palace coup.

And not through a snap leadership election run under rule changes designed by Morgan McSweeney/Labour Together in order to hand someone like Wes Streeting a coronation.

Advertisement

My full interview on Sky. pic.twitter.com/qgrc8DrHhJ

— Richard Burgon MP (@RichardBurgon) May 10, 2026

Go West

It was widely predicted that Starmer would face a leadership challenge if Labour performed badly in the local elections. When a challenge failed to materialise, West took matters into her own hands.

In a statement published to X/Twitter, West said:

Across the country yesterday, so many hard working Labour Councillors lost their seats through no fault of their own. I want to thank them for their service and dedication.

I was honoured to serve under Keir Starmer’s leadership, both in opposition and in Government. All of us in the Labour Party are thankful to Keir for the 2024 General Election and the good work since. I personally get on well with Keir.

But his approach is not cutting through, and the results over the past 48 hours are nothing short of disastrous. Unless things change, we risk Nigel Farage becoming Prime Minister.

That’s why, with regret and significant sadness, I firmly believe that Keir should outline his intention to resign as Prime Minister and oversee an orderly transition.

Advertisement

The Labour Party need the chance to have an honest conversation about how we deliver the change we promised in 2024, and that requires new leadership which understands the urgent and real concerns of people across the UK.

Keir has demonstrated significant leadership on the world stage and is well placed to represent the UK’s national interest while this process takes place and may even continue in an international role in the future but for now I know I speak for more Labour people than just myself in wanting him to step aside as our Leader.

West also threatened to put herself forwards as a ‘stalking horse’ candidate – i.e. a candidate who wants to kick off a leadership race but doesn’t want to become the leader themselves:

Unexpected stalking horse?

Labour MP Catherine West: “I don't have a candidate, and that's part of the problem. But I think there are several people who would like to do it who have been planning for months. But I'm very surprised that none of them has popped up today to say: "I… https://t.co/qdneGERGJw

— Pippa Crerar (@PippaCrerar) May 9, 2026

West would later suggest that maybe she could see herself becoming PM:

Catherine West’s interview round is going down extremely badly with some MPs across the factional divide

People are stunned by this quote: “You know what sometimes happens to stalking horses? They become the candidate”

Which seems to suggest she thinks she could really be PM

— Alex Wickham (@alexwickham) May 9, 2026

Advertisement

Starmer — The response

As Aubrey Allegretti reported, West’s intervention went down poorly with Starmer’s loyalists:

Bit of a row in the London PLP WhatsApp group chat, as anger builds over losses in the capital.

Catherine West – a former minister – writes: “I have asked Anna Turley as Chair of the Party for a reassurance that she has a plan for an orderly arrangement of change at the top of the party.”

Steve Reed replied, saying that doomscrolling through leaders would be “madness”.

Advertisement

West wrote back: “It can be orderly or disorderly but it’s happening Steve.”

Steve Reed is the housing minister who Starmer deployed to smear the Greens as antisemites in the local election campaign:

Is Steve Reed implying Zack Polanski is an antisemite??? Really? Say it with your whole chest, coward.

2 years in govt & 6 years running Labour, this all they have. No track record, no ideas, no hope.

Advertisement

The death throes of an unlawful, vile project; the muscle memory of punching… https://t.co/MKd10B4isc

— The Fraud (@StarmertheFraud) May 5, 2026

Reed’s campaign did not prove to be effective, but Reed is sticking to it, because the only thing the Labour right are good at is attacking the left:

Steve Reed told the BBC this morning that Labour needs to 're-adjust' after its humiliating local election drubbing, only to then keep smearing the Greens

by @skwawkbox https://t.co/HgbOw534hn

— Canary (@TheCanaryUK) May 8, 2026

Steve Reed, a key figure in the political project that seized control of the Labour party & brought it to this point, says yesterdays results are what happens at this point in a 5 year parliamentary cycle.

They'd rather burn the party to the ground than change direction. pic.twitter.com/OiMaUYXIi3

— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) May 8, 2026

Back to the West saga, her plan also proved unpopular with Andy Burnham and his backers. Everyone knows that Burnham wants to challenge Starmer to become PM, but he can’t right now because he isn’t an MP:

UPDATE: Andy Burnham's allies are "desperately trying" to convince Catherine West to abandon her leadership bid as he will not be able to run

[@Tony_Diver] https://t.co/vF6vhuGbwd

— Politics UK (@PolitlcsUK) May 9, 2026

Advertisement

West herself said:

I’m sorry for people who had a big plan about particular candidates who one day will be, you know, an MP and all that sort of thing… I really like Andy, but he’s not here on the spot, so he can’t really do it

Her point is undeniable. And although Burnham is reportedly scheming to return, we know Starmer would try to block him, just like he did last time. The question is if he could get away with it twice; especially as cabinet members are reportedly willing to use their position to secure the return of the king of the North:

On Andy Burnham:

* Allies say seat has "100%" been lined up

* Private polling they've conducted reassures them he will win any by-election

* Keir Starmer will be told to make statement he can run. If he refuses a leadership challenge, backed by Ministers, will be triggered

— (((Dan Hodges))) (@DPJHodges) May 9, 2026

Advertisement

Burnham also has support from left-wing Labour MPs like Clive Lewis:

"Keir Starmer is completely out of touch with reality"@labourlewis is backing Andy Burnham as the person to prevent a Reform govt. pic.twitter.com/b9vill7teh

— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) May 10, 2026

Advertisement

So, key Labour insiders clearly want Burnham as PM. The question is if the other challengers – Wes Streeting and Angela Rayner – can be held back until then.

Challengers approaching

Alex Wickham reported:

— As Bloomberg reported last night the Ed Miliband / Lou Haigh / Tribune faction wants “delay then Andy,” putting off a contest until Burnham is in Parliament. They favour him to Rayner.

— But the big flaw in this plan is it may incentivise Streeting and Rayner to move now before Burnham is in. All eyes are on whether Streeting and Rayner will go over the top in the coming days, perhaps after Keir Starmer’s Monday speech, which will surely never be able to meet the demands of Labour MPs.

Advertisement

There is particular speculation that the Wes Streeting camp is happy to use West’s stalking horse challenge to get their man into the race:

Senior MP texts to tell me that “everyone sensible” is trying to get Catherine West to withdraw. “It’s completely irresponsible”. MP also says they think Streeting allies will lend votes to West to try trigger race

— Beth Rigby (@BethRigby) May 9, 2026

The fact that West will reportedly have enough support to launch a leadership challenge does suggest that supporters of Streeting or Rayner are willing to get behind her. After all, there isn’t a contingent of West loyalists (not that we know of anyway):

Labour MP says he is "almost certain" Catherine West will have the 81 MPs she needs to trigger a leadership election on Monday. https://t.co/fMaH9km4WL

— Kevin Schofield (@KevinASchofield) May 9, 2026

‘Frustrations’

Richard Burgon of the Labour left, meanwhile, had this to say:

I do understand Catherine West’s deep frustrations. They are shared by a large number of MPs and Labour members who feel we cannot go on like this and that Keir needs to go – as I have also called for.

But I can’t support the proposals she explained on TV this morning.

Catherine’s stated preference is for a Cabinet stitch-up – a kind of palace coup.

That would mean the very people who sat back and allowed terrible decisions like the winter fuel and disability cuts to happen end up deciding the future of the party. That will not be seen by the public as a clean break.

Advertisement

Catherine says that if there isn’t a Cabinet deal, she will trigger an immediate leadership election. I fear there’s a real danger that, whatever her good intentions, her move will be exploited by people on the right of the party who want a coronation and not a proper democratic contest in the party.

It may even be that those people help secure the 81 nominations needed to kickstart any leadership race.

What we need instead is for Keir to set a date for his departure, followed by a full and proper democratic contest that can look at what went wrong and how we change course to win back trust and support, with a broad range of candidates and viewpoints represented.

And that process has to involve all MPs, not just the Cabinet, as well as trade unions and party members, all of whom must have a democratic voice in choosing Labour’s future direction.

Advertisement

Keir Starmer Drama

At this point, it seems like anything could happen. Well, anything besides Keir Starmer staying in power, obviously.

As limp as this current incarnation of Labour is, even they can’t be weak enough to allow Starmer to slowly destroy the party – if only because Catherine West won’t let them.

Featured image via Parliament

By Willem Moore

Source link

Nigel Farage‘s Reform UK has appointed the first woman to sit in a cabinet position, as Ella Worthington takes responsibility for ‘civic pride’ on Lancashire County Council.

However, critics have pointed out how there is very little known about the responsibilities of this newly created cabinet role. As a result, people have looked at the billionaire-funded party’s misogynistic and patriarchal rhetoric and raised concerns that this is merely smoke and mirrors.

Former Labour councillor-turned-independent Azhar Ali, and leader of the opposition on the county council told the BBC:

I think this is just a tokenistic gesture, no one knows what the role is or what the job entails.

Worthington won the election last year in the county elections and has since faced criticism for her posts that many have described as hateful and derogatory towards the UK’s Muslim population.

In particular, she slammed news of the first Mosque in the Lake District and implied it was being forced through:

will turn a natural, beautiful place into something it’s not.

Local Election Results 2026 – Old Skelmersdale

Ella Worthington has been elected.

Reform UK gain. #WestLancsElects #LocalElections pic.twitter.com/oUU0d7NtNZ

Advertisement

— West Lancashire Borough Council (@Westlancsbc) May 8, 2026

Reform — 33% turnout

Worthington won the local election on May 7, which saw a 33% turnout and just shy of 43% of the votes going to this Reform councillor. Reform UK has typically framed this as a gain, unsurprisingly, and some argue that point may carry weight, given that Reform councillors often defect, face suspension, or come under investigation for various forms of misconduct. Few of its councillors secure re-election.

Possibly a perk of being a misogynised woman, and not a misogynistic man with a shady and abusive past like David Barker.

Nevertheless, this councillor has been more than comfortable to inflame divisions pushing racial abuse through her social media.

For instance, she attempted to whip up hate — and succeeded as this Mosque has faced attacks from the far-right meant to intimidate Muslims — with this post on X last year:

Reform UK Lancashire County Councillor and Scrutiny Deputy Chair Ella Worthington sharing an old post by the Leader of UKIP.

The mosque site in question has been target by the far right because of posts like this.@LancashireCC, this is one to investigate. @reformparty_uk do… pic.twitter.com/VamJS1ZQ0m

Advertisement

— Reform Party UK Exposed (@reformexposed) August 13, 2025

Now she is responsible for ‘civic pride’, it isn’t hard to recognise whose ‘pride’ this position is there to represent – that of racist white supremacists. As a result, it is essential that this councillor face scrutiny herself – something she should hardly oppose given her prior role as deputy chair for scrutiny of the county council.

Worthington defended the new role, telling the BBC:

It’s all about civic pride across Lancashire, giving people a voice, giving them pride in where they live, helping institutions and business move forward, giving people civic pride and the love of the area that they live in.

It’s not about religion, it’s about white supremacy

However, Muslim people and other minoritised groups also live within the ward, raising questions over whether this will lead to an increase in race-baiting in the northwest ward. In regard to the population breakdown, migrants from the EU far outnumber any other group with only 118 living in the area with a religion other than Christianity.

Nevertheless, it is worth noting that Christianity and the teachings of Jesus tend to talk about welcoming strangers and being kind to our neighbours, as opposed to setting out to increase local divisions.

But let’s not pretend that Britain’s ‘Christian values’ have anything to do with Reform UK, as this post underscores:

Reform has no answers over Farage photo with church attackershttps://t.co/ZH9vkbn4Hs

— Reform Party UK Exposed (@reformexposed) May 7, 2026

Reform’s Worthington has the ‘right skills’ for what exactly?

Reform UK took control of the council last year, and many expressed surprise at the complete lack of female representation on its cabinet. At the time, leader of the council Stephen Atkinson said:

I’m sure that some of the ladies of the group will be useful in the future at the cabinet level, but when the skills are the right skills.

Like many, we are a bit unsure what skills women lack to be able to work in a cabinet in local council — especially when every other party has had no trouble in putting women in these positions in the past and currently. This surely can only highlight what we have all been saying — or shouting into an apparent void — that Reform are just the amalgamation of toxic masculinity, patriarchy and frankly, a bunch of women-hating men often found to have pretty abusive histories. 

Atkinson has spoken since her appointment, saying:

I’m delighted to have Ella on board to deliver this initiative, she works incredibly hard and is passionate about delivering for our communities across Lancashire.

Given Worthington’s clear Islamophobic tendencies, it isn’t hard to identify the skills which have ‘qualified’ her for a cabinet position:

Reform MP openly downplays racist colleague's comments pic.twitter.com/9fRfR2gTIl

— Canary (@TheCanaryUK) May 10, 2026

Racists are ripping off councils — first flags, now ‘civic pride’

Funnily enough, cabinet posts add a tidy £23,597 over and above the basic councillor allowance of £14,301. However, this ‘civic pride’ role is brand new and precious little is known about what it is intended to do.

According to the BBC, opposition leader Ali would have preferred that money go to people who actually do ‘proper jobs’ and finally address significant issues in their community affecting people’s quality of life:

It’s all smoke and mirrors, what we need is real people doing some proper jobs and making sure roads are fit for a purpose, weeding, gullies emptied and the basic things that residents want.

Therefore, is this not simply another example of Reform wasting public money as it conducts an inciteful and incendiary campaign that blames ordinary people for the public’s woes, instead of the super-rich who fleece them every day and now lead political parties to preserve the status quo?

Once again, ordinary people will face higher costs at a local level while a small minority of millionaires and billionaires benefit, leaving everyone else with harder lives and, potentially, more divided and violent communities.

Featured image via Facebook

By Maddison Wheeldon

Source link

Sunday evening marked the most prestigious night in British telly, as some of the biggest performers from the UK and beyond gathered for the annual TV Baftas.

Hosted for the first time by comedian Greg Davies, the night recognised achievement in drama, comedy, reality TV and more, as awards were handed out for the biggest shows of the last 12 months.

With so many A-listers gathered under one roof, you can imagine that it was quite a jam-packed evening, with more going on than most of us could keep up with.

So, in that spirit, we’ve rounded up 17 must-see moments from the 2026 TV Baftas…

Advertisement

Let’s start with the red carpet, shall we? Adolescence stars Stephen Graham and Owen Cooper were reunited on their way into the TV Baftas, and it’s fair to say the height difference between them has become a bit more stark in the year since the show’s Netflix premiere

Stuart C. Wilson via Getty Images

Speaking of on-screen fathers-and-sons, Matt Smith and Rafael Mathé also posed together on their way into the event

Anthony Harvey/Shutterstock

Real-life dad-and-daughter Danny and Dani Dyer also attended the 2026 TV Baftas together

NEIL HALLNEIL HALL/EPA/Shutterstock

Claudia Winkleman took a break from shooting Celebrity Traitors to bring back pedal-pushers on the red carpet

Anthony Harvey/Shutterstock

Reigning Traitors champions Rachel and Stephen had their own low-key reunion on the red carpet…

Anthony Harvey/Shutterstock

Alan West/Hogan Media/Shutterstock

David Fisher/Shutterstock

During the main event, Seth Rogen beat some stiff competition in the Best International Programme category, and dedicated his win to his The Studio co-star Catherine O’Hara

Alan West/Hogan Media/Shutterstock

After winning the Memorable Moment prize for his Celebrity Traitors win, Alan Carr shouted out his ‘thick’ co-stars, ribbed Celia Imrie for the fart heard around the nation and once again bigged up Paloma Faith, who he infamously ‘murdered’ on their first night in the castle

The creators of Gaza: Doctors Under Attack had a defiant message to the BBC during their acceptance speech, expressing solidarity with Palestine after calling out the broadcaster for axing their documentary (leading to it being picked up by Channel 4), finally asking: ’Given you dropped our film, will you drop us from the Bafta screening later tonight?

Aurora delivered a beautiful performance during the In Memoriam tributes section

Advertisement

As he made his way onto the stage to collect his Special Award, Martin Lewis was met with a standing ovation

He then delivered a stirring acceptance speech, dedicating his win to his late mother

Alan West/Hogan Media/Shutterstock

Mary Berry received this year’s Bafta fellowship and made it clear she’s still looking to the future

Elsewhere, after an awards season that’s largely celebrated Owen Cooper and Stephen Graham (who, of course, also picked up awards during the TV Baftas), it was amazing to see Adolescence’s Christine Tremarco get her moment to shine too

Unsurprisingly, Adolescence was the night’s top winner – setting a new record for the most TV Baftas received by a single show in the space of one night

David Fisher/Shutterstock

And finally, we can’t stop watching this red carpet montage of Alan Carr before the ceremony

Advertisement

Source link

Reform — The idea that media outlets can be free from bias is obviously ridiculous. All media organisations are biased in some fashion or another; the question is whether they’re honest with you about that, or whether they try to present themselves as impartial.

In the case of Politics UK, the impression given is that this is run-of-the-mill British news site. What you wouldn’t expect, then, is that the site’s founder is now a councillor for Reform UK:

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by UK Fact Check Politics (@ukfactcheckpolitics)

Reform’s Bailey Nash-Gardner

UK Fact Check reported the above, noting that councillor Bailey Nash-Gardner:

has been active in Conservative politics since at least 2017, previously served as campaign manager and parliamentary assistant to the then Conservative MP Andrew Rosindell between 2023 and 2026.

In a more detailed write-up, they add:

Despite repeatedly presenting Politics UK as politically neutral, critics have pointed to the platform’s coverage and language choices as evidence of apparent bias. In a post published on election day, the account referred to a group of independent candidates as “the Muslim independents,” despite not applying similar religious or ethnic labels to other independent candidates. Critics accused the post of singling out Muslim candidates in a way that risked fuelling division.

This is precisely the sort of subtle bias that sites like Politics UK are suited to spreading. Many people won’t go near outlets like the Mail or the Sun because they recognise they’re openly hostile and divisive. They might feel comfortable with Politics UK, however, and they won’t necessarily pick up that the site is quietly guiding them to see Muslims as ‘others’.

Impartiality

UK Fact Check added:

Nash-Gardner’s election to Havering Council means that one of the country’s most prominent political social media platforms — one that describes itself as offering “impartial coverage” — is now owned by a sitting councillor representing a party that critics say receives favourable coverage on the platform.

And this is what it comes down to, isn’t it? Politics UK describe themselves as follows:

The Home of UK Political News. Follow & turn on notifications for impartial coverage first.

It’s fine to be partial; the Canary certainly is, and in ways that we openly broadcast. What’s not fine is the growing merger between UK politics and UK media. And once again, it’s Reform which is leading the charge on that front – namely by having multiple politicians who work (or have worked) for GB News, including Nigel Farage, Lee Anderson, and Matt Goodwin.

This is all especially concerning when you consider GB News’s output:

GB News Scandal: The dossier

Twenty journalists analysed 15 hours of television – none of which complied with Ofcom’s regulations. These are their findingshttps://t.co/ikwfIVrC2P

— Reform Party UK Exposed (@reformexposed) March 18, 2026

The New World today revealed that GB News has become the official propaganda channel for Reform UK, with not a single hour of programming complying with broadcasting law. Ofcom is doing nothing about it.#ReformWatch #GBNews #Ofcom pic.twitter.com/5y4bwtE3hL

— Jack Dart (@JackWDart) March 18, 2026

Consolidation

The Tories have traditionally enjoyed an easier time than Labour in the media. There’s a very simple reason for this, and it’s because many media owners are aligned with the Conservative Party. Now, it seems clear that Reform is seeking to do something similar with new media outlets like GB News and Politics UK.

On the one hand, you can’t really fault the party for pursuing a winning strategy. On the other, we’re obviously going to call it out any time Politics UK forgets its supposed ‘impartiality’.

Featured image via UK Politics

By Willem Moore

Source link

The Iranian Football Federation has confirmed that the Iranian national team will participate in the 2026 World Cup finals, despite political tensions and the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, whilst stressing the need for the tournament’s host nations — the United States, Canada and Mexico — to take “Tehran’s concerns” into account.

The Iranian Federation’s stance came after Canadian authorities refused last month to grant Federation President Mehdi Taj a visa to attend the FIFA Congress, on the grounds that he has links to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, which Ottawa has classified as a “terrorist organisation” since 2024.

In a statement published on its official website, the Iranian Football Federation confirmed that the national team would “definitely” participate in the 2026 World Cup, but called on the host nations to take Iran’s concerns into account and ensure respect for the “beliefs, culture and convictions” of the Iranian delegation during the tournament.

The participation of Iran in the World Cup, scheduled to take place between 11 June and 19 July 2026, has been the subject of speculation since the outbreak of war following the US-Israeli attack on Iran on 28 February.

Iran’s conditions for participating in the 2026 World Cup

Iran’s demands included the granting of visas to all national team players and coaching staff without any obstacles or exceptions, as well as ensuring that the delegation is not subjected to any interrogations or exceptional procedures after the visas have been issued.

Iran also demanded that entry be facilitated for Iranian journalists and fans into the host countries, and that the Iranian flag be respected inside stadiums during tournament matches, in addition to ensuring that the national anthem is played in full and without interruption.

The conditions also included providing a high level of security protection for the national team’s delegation at airports, hotels and stadiums, and ensuring the team’s transport between their accommodation and the match venues in an organised and safe manner.

Tehran also emphasised the need to respect the national team’s technical and administrative staff during the tournament, and to limit questions at press conferences to technical matters only, without delving into political issues.

The demands concluded by emphasising that there should be no discrimination against any member of the Iranian delegation, including players who have completed their military service in official capacities, with a strong emphasis on ensuring they are treated normally throughout the tournament.

Iran is expected to base its training camp in Tucson during the tournament, where it will compete in Group G alongside Egypt, Belgium and New Zealand, kicking off its campaign against New Zealand in Los Angeles on 15 June.

Featured image via LeMonde

By Alaa Shamali

Source link