Bitcoin’s cryptographic foundations are once again in the spotlight as prominent voices warn that post-quantum security will soon demand more than minor tweaks. Crypto entrepreneur Nic Carter has pressed Bitcoin developers to confront the quantum threat head-on, arguing that Ethereum already possesses a clearer post-quantum roadmap and momentum. The debate arrives amid broader signals that quantum risks are climbing higher on the industry agenda, with Google warning of a migration deadline and researchers warning that a significant portion of BTC could be exposed to quantum attacks in the long run.

Elliptic curve cryptography underpins Bitcoin’s security. Users generate a private key and derive a public address through operations on a curved mathematical surface, a process that quantum computers could potentially undermine in the future. While the timeline remains debated, the risk is considered non-zero enough to fuel ongoing discussions about how to adapt. Carter has been vocal on X, asserting that “elliptic curve cryptography is on the brink of obsolescence,” and that the community should acknowledge the inevitability of change within a finite horizon. He argues that the current design is overly rigid and that a plan for cryptographic mutability—where the network can upgrade or swap cryptographic primitives—will become essential.

On the other side of the debate, Ethereum developers have already signaled progress. Carter notes that Ethereum has established a dedicated post-quantum security effort and a roadmap that places post-quantum readiness as a top strategic priority for 2029. In his view, Ethereum’s proactive posture stands in contrast to Bitcoin’s approach, which he characterizes as hesitant or slow to move beyond the current standards. The Ethereum Foundation’s post-quantum security team is pursuing concrete steps toward a migration path that could preserve security guarantees in a quantum-enabled world. A detailed post-quantum roadmap is available through Ethereum’s planning pages, underscoring a deliberate, institution-backed push for resilience.

Key takeaways

• Ethereum is actively advancing post-quantum security with a formal roadmap and a dedicated security team, targeting 2029 as a strategic milestone.
• Bitcoin’s core developers face sustained scrutiny over their handling of quantum risk, with critics calling for greater openness to cryptographic mutability and upgrades (e.g., BIP-360 discussions).
• ARK Invest estimated in a March report that roughly one-third of BTC could be exposed to quantum threats in the long term, highlighting a potential structural risk that may influence long-horizon planning.
• Google’s 2029 migration deadline for post-quantum cryptography signals that quantum-resilience is a cross-industry priority and could accelerate timelines for crypto networks and other digital systems.
• The market implication is a potential divergence in how networks prepare for quantum threats, with investors watching who moves fastest and how upgrades affect usability, security, and governance.

Bitcoin’s risk debate and the call for cryptographic mutability

Nic Carter has argued that Bitcoin’s cryptographic design is at a crossroads. In public posts, he described elliptic curve cryptography as edging toward obsolescence and warned that the window to address this threat is finite. The thrust of his argument is pragmatic: if quantum adversaries advance, networks built on fixed cryptographic assumptions might struggle to adapt without a pathway to evolve their security primitives. He has stressed that a rethinking of how cryptography is integrated—potentially moving toward more flexible, upgradable security layers—could be necessary for Bitcoin to remain secure in a post-quantum era.

The debate around BIP-360—an explicit attempt to introduce quantum-resistant considerations into Bitcoin’s improvement process—has been a focal point. Carter has publicly critiqued Bitcoin Core’s responsiveness to proposals that aim to future-proof the protocol, warning of a “worst in class” approach if the community does not confront the issue. In response, Ethan Heilman, a co-author of BIP-360, asserted that Core contributors have engaged with the proposal and that BIP-360 has attracted more comments than any prior Bitcoin Improvement Proposal, signaling active discussion even amid controversy. The exchange illustrates a wider tension in Bitcoin development: how aggressively to pursue changes that could alter the network’s operating model versus preserving a conservative, minimally invasive upgrade path.

Beyond the debate within Bitcoin circles, the question remains: what is the practical path to quantum resilience for a system designed to be censorship-resistant and autonomous? Carter has argued for a reimagining of how cryptography is embedded in the network, suggesting that “cryptographic mutability” will have to become a core design consideration. The trade-offs—between security, governance, and user experience—will shape what an eventual mutability framework looks like and how it is implemented in a way that preserves user trust and network integrity.

Ethereum’s post-quantum momentum and the broader market signal

Ethereum’s posture toward quantum resistance appears more proactive, according to Carter and observers familiar with the ecosystem. The chain’s post-quantum roadmap, supported by the Ethereum Foundation’s post-quantum security team, frames quantum resilience as a concrete, near-term objective rather than a distant hypothetical. The roadmap aligns with a broader industry push to future-proof critical cryptographic infrastructure against increasingly capable quantum machines. As investor attention sharpens on long-horizon risk, Ethereum’s approach may illustrate a more concrete path to maintaining security guarantees as the cryptographic landscape evolves.

Vitalik Buterin himself has flagged a set of areas where quantum threats could affect network security and usability. In late February, he indicated that validator signatures, data storage, accounts, and proofs would need updates to withstand quantum attacks, and he has proposed a quantum resistance roadmap that seeks to normalize these transitions across the network. The Ethereum community’s emphasis on concrete milestones and governance readiness reflects a preference for a structured evolution of cryptographic primitives, which could reduce disruption for users yet requires careful coordination across upgrades and client implementations. The roadmap is also supported by public posts and community planning resources, including a dedicated post-quantum page linked to by the ecosystem’s planning resources.

For developers and users, the contrast between Bitcoin’s cautious stance and Ethereum’s forward-looking plan carries practical implications. If quantum-resistant upgrades become commonplace in major networks, the industry could see a shift in how wallets, exchanges, and infrastructure providers design their security models and upgrade paths. The BIP-360 discourse and Ethereum’s roadmap illustrate how different communities balance risk, governance, and user experience when addressing a threat that could redefine digital signatures and key management in the years ahead.

Cross-industry signals and what readers should watch next

The quantum threat is no longer purely theoretical. In parallel to crypto-focused discussions, major tech players are signaling urgency. Google recently raised the stakes by setting a 2029 deadline for migrating to post-quantum cryptography, underscoring that the shift to quantum-resilient standards may arrive sooner than expected for many digital systems. The move adds external pressure for crypto projects to demonstrate practical, implementable paths toward durable security in a quantum-enabled era. For investors, this alignment with mainstream tech timelines adds a layer of accountability to networks’ security roadmaps.

ARK Invest’s March 11 report adds another dimension to the discussion. The firm estimated that about a third of BTC could be at risk from quantum threats in the long term, highlighting a potential material vulnerability for a substantial portion of the market’s capitalization. While the firm characterizes the risk as long-term, the data point reinforces the urgency for credible, actionable plans that go beyond theoretical risk assessments. The market’s interpretation of this risk will hinge on how quickly developers and communities can implement robust quantum-resistant mechanisms without undermining network efficiency or governance.

In this evolving landscape, several questions remain. How quickly can cryptographic mutability be introduced in a way that preserves Bitcoin’s core properties and user trust? Will Ethereum’s current roadmap translate into a scalable, user-friendly pathway to quantum resilience, or will it require additional innovations across layer-one and layer-two ecosystems? How will exchanges, wallets, and institutional participants adapt their security architectures to accommodate quantum-resistant primitives? And as Google’s deadline looms, will other tech domains accelerate their own transitions in tandem with crypto networks?

What matters for readers is the growing acknowledgement that quantum resistance is not a distant “would-be” feature but an imminent design consideration. As developers weigh upgrade paths, investors should monitor the pace of concrete milestones, the degree of community consensus, and the practical impact on usability and security. The coming years will reveal whether the crypto sector can deliver smooth, scalable transitions that preserve user trust while hardening networks against quantum threats.

Readers should keep an eye on updates to Ethereum’s post-quantum roadmap and any new Bitcoin proposals that move beyond high-level rhetoric toward implementable, tested solutions. As the quantum horizon approaches, the sector’s ability to translate theoretical risk into actionable upgrades will be the defining metric of resilience and long-term value creation. For now, the signal is clear: quantum resistance is rising up the agenda, and the race to implement credible, community-supported safeguards is well underway.

What to watch next: the pace and scope of Bitcoin’s response to quantum risk, the concrete milestones in Ethereum’s post-quantum plan, and cross-industry developments that could pressure timelines across the broader crypto and tech ecosystems. The coming quarters will show whether a convergent path toward practical quantum resilience emerges or if divergent approaches persist across networks.

Further reading and sources include: ArK Invest’s March 11 report on BTC quantum risk, Ethereum’s post-quantum security roadmap and team, Vitalik Buterin’s comments on quantum-resistant upgrades, BIP-360 discussions and community responses, and Google’s 2029 migration deadline for post-quantum cryptography.

Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva signed into law a sweeping set of reforms aimed at dismantling organized crime, and cryptocurrencies are at the center of the strategy.

Under Law No. 15.358, enacted March 25, cryptoassets confiscated from criminal organizations can be funneled into Brazil’s public security system.

This includes funding for police equipment, intelligence operations and officer training. The law explicitly allows the provisional use of these assets before a final conviction, provided it is approved by a judge.

Rather than treating seized cryptocurrencies as a potential reserve of value for the state, an idea floated by some crypto advocates, the government is using it as a tool in the crackdown on groups like the PCC and Comando Vermelho.

The decision aligns with Brazil’s broader efforts to modernize the justice system’s handling of digital property and organized crime.

The legislation also significantly expands judicial authority to freeze, block or seize cryptoassets during investigations, including suspending access to exchanges, digital wallets and online platforms. Once convicted, individuals permanently lose access to the formal financial and crypto systems.

The law defines the use of encrypted messaging apps or privacy tools to conceal criminal activity as an aggravating factor, increasing potential sentences.

It also enables international cooperation for asset recovery and intelligence sharing, and creates a national criminal database integrating financial structures of known criminal groups.

Congressional Republicans are already on the ropes in this year’s U.S. midterm elections, and Congress is likely to shift in ways that deeply affect crypto efforts. So, advocacy group Stand With Crypto is gearing up with a slate of candidate endorsements and a new political poll that says neither party has a majority advantage as crypto’s best advocate.

Stand With Crypto, established initially by Coinbase as a pro-crypto group populated by retail investors, is known for its political advocacy, including maintaining a grading system for U.S. politicians. It announced endorsements in six “battleground” races on Thursday, backing congressional incumbents — such as Republican Zach Nunn in Iowa and Democrat Don Davis in North Carolina — who have been supportive of the industry.

The organization will deploy efforts to marshal its membership to vote and will also pay for media campaigns. In two other districts, it said it will oppose politicians with records against crypto interests. And more races will be named as the year goes on, the group said.

In these consequential elections, Stand With Crypto commissioned a survey that outlined a sense of crypto-owning voters in battleground states. The results, released Thursday, show that neither the Republican nor Democratic party has locked down a majority who think they’re better for the industry, though Republicans are favored 45% to 26%, according to the Impact Research study conducted last month.

The snapshot of potential voters, which had a margin of error of 4.4%, said crypto enthusiasts were highly motivated to cast ballots this year, and 64% of those who hold crypto said they’re enthusiastic about supporting pro-crypto candidates.

These midterms could bring significant consequences for the industry. Even if Congress finishes the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act before the November general elections, a number of other crypto legislative needs remain — including a tailoring of the U.S. tax system for crypto, and the establishment of a U.S. strategic bitcoin reserve that President Donald Trump ordered. But it’s very likely that Democrats will be running at least one of the congressional chambers by then, and crypto may not be as high a priority as it’s been for Republicans.

Wagers at prediction market firm Kalshi have the chances of Democrats taking the House majority at more than 84%. The odds for the more difficult Democratic path in the Senate is considered closer to a coin flip.

The other House lawmakers endorsed by Stand With Crypto include:

• Representative Susie Lee, a Nevada Democrat;
• Representative Mike Lawler, a New York Republican;
• Representative Greg Landsman, an Ohio Democrat;
• Representative Rob Bresnahan, a Pennsylvania Republican.

Read More: Stand With Crypto advocacy group sees nearly 700,000 new members ahead of 2026 election

The Death of APR as a Metric

(And why your “yield” is probably lying to you)

There was a time when APR ruled DeFi.

Scroll any dashboard, and it screams the same thing:
“1,245% APR 🚀” — like a neon sign pulling you into the casino.

And for a while, it worked.

But today? APR is less of a signal… and more of a decoy.

Let’s break down why APR is dying—and what actually matters now.

APR Was Always a Half-Truth

APR (Annual Percentage Rate) assumes one big thing:

That everything stays the same.

• Same rewards.
• Same token price.
• Same liquidity.
• Same user behavior.

In DeFi, that assumption lasts about… 12 minutes.

The moment emissions change, token prices drop, or whales rotate—your “1,000% APR” quietly collapses into something far less exciting.

APR doesn’t measure reality. It measures a snapshot of a moment that’s already gone.

The Illusion of High Yield

Here’s the uncomfortable truth:

High APR is often a symptom of high inflation, not high returns.

Protocols boost APR by flooding rewards:

• Printing tokens
• Emitting aggressively
• Incentivizing short-term liquidity

At first, it looks like profit.

But zoom out:

• Token price dumps
• Liquidity exits
• Late users hold the bag

What looked like yield was actually dilution.

APR Ignores the Only Thing That Matters: Net Profit

Let’s say you farm:

• 300% APR
• But the reward token drops 70%
• And you get hit with impermanent loss

Did you win?

APR says yes.
Your wallet says otherwise.

APR doesn’t account for:

• Price volatility
• Slippage
• Gas fees
• Impermanent loss
• Exit liquidity

It’s like judging a business by revenue… while ignoring expenses.

The market is evolving.

The Rise of “Real Yield”

Protocols are shifting from:

• Emissions → Revenue sharing
• Incentives → Sustainable fees
• Inflation → Actual cash flow

“Real yield” means:

Earnings come from users paying for a service—not from printing tokens out of thin air.

Think:

• Trading fees
• Borrowing interest
• Protocol revenue redistribution

It’s slower.
Less flashy.
But infinitely more real.

APR Is Now a Marketing Tool

Let’s be blunt:

APR today is often just a growth hack.

A way to:

• Attract liquidity quickly
• Bootstrap a network
• Create hype

And sometimes…
to distract you.

Because if a protocol leads with APR instead of fundamentals, you should ask:

What are they not showing me?

What You Should Look At Instead

1. Revenue Sources

Where does the money actually come from?

2. Token Emissions

Is yield being printed or earned?

3. Liquidity Quality

Can you exit without nuking the price?

4. User Demand

Are people using the product—or just farming it?

5. Sustainability

Will this still exist in 6 months?

The Bottom Line

APR isn’t completely useless.

But treating it as your north star?

That’s how you get wrecked.

In today’s DeFi landscape:

• Attention is gamified
• Yield is engineered
• Narratives move faster than fundamentals

The edge now belongs to those who look past the headline number.

Because the real game isn’t about earning the highest APR.

It’s about keeping the most value when the music stops.

Final Thinking

If someone is still selling you on APR alone…

You’re not looking at an opportunity.

You’re looking at an exit strategy—just not yours.

REQUEST AN ARTICLE

MARA Holdings (MARA) sold 15,133 bitcoin for approximately $1.1 billion between March 4 and March 25 to fund a major balance sheet overhaul.

The company is using the proceeds to repurchase roughly $1.0 billion of its 0.00% convertible senior notes due 2030 and 2031 at a discount.

In total, MARA will buy back $367.5 million of its 2030 notes for $322.9 million and $633.4 million of its 2031 notes for $589.9 million. The discounted purchases, about 9% below par, will generate approximately $88.1 million in value, said the company.

MARA was higher by 10% in premarket trading.

Beyond the immediate savings, the transaction materially reshapes MARA’s capital structure. The repurchases will reduce its convertible debt by around 30%, cutting total outstanding convertible notes from about $3.3 billion to $2.3 billion. This also reduces the risk of future shareholder dilution associated with conversions.

“Our decision to sell a portion of our bitcoin holdings reflects a strategic capital allocation move designed to strengthen our balance sheet and position the company for long-term growth,” said CEO Fred Thiel.

MARA now holds 38,689 BTC following the sale.

Key Takeaways

• Chewy shares climbed approximately 13% following 2026 revenue projections of $13.6B–$13.75B, surpassing Wall Street’s expectations
• Fourth-quarter revenue reached $3.26 billion, representing an 8.1% increase when accounting for the additional week in the prior-year period
• The customer base expanded 4% to 21.3 million active users; average spending per customer increased 2.2% to $591
• The company anticipates artificial intelligence initiatives will generate $50M+ in annual cost reductions by 2027, with initial savings in the “low tens of millions” projected for 2026
• The Chewy Vet Care network expanded to 18 facilities and represents the company’s fastest-expanding business line by customer spending

Chewy delivered fourth-quarter financial results on Wednesday that aligned with Wall Street projections, though it was the forward-looking 2026 guidance that sparked significant investor enthusiasm.

Chewy, Inc., CHWY

The online pet products platform issued full-year revenue guidance ranging from $13.6 billion to $13.75 billion. This forecast exceeded the analyst consensus estimate of $13.58 billion, propelling shares approximately 13% higher during Wednesday’s session to close near $26.50.

Fourth-quarter revenue totaled $3.26 billion, representing a 0.5% increase on a reported basis and an 8.1% gain after adjusting for the calendar discrepancy with the previous year’s comparable quarter. This figure aligned with analyst projections. Gross profit margin expanded by 90 basis points to reach 29.4%, while adjusted EBITDA increased from $124.5 million to $162.3 million.

Adjusted earnings per share registered at $0.27, falling one cent short of the $0.28 Street consensus. On a GAAP basis, net income reached $39.2 million, or $0.09 per diluted share, compared to $22.8 million in the year-ago period.

The active customer count rose 4% year-over-year to 21.3 million users. Net sales per active customer increased 2.2% to $591. Chief Executive Officer Sumit Singh highlighted that pet parents are progressively viewing their animals as family members and upgrading to higher-quality, premium offerings — a behavioral shift he anticipates will persist.

Chief Financial Officer Chris Deppe clarified that the 2026 guidance assumes zero pricing inflation. Revenue expansion is projected to stem from attracting new customers alongside increased wallet share from the existing base.

Artificial Intelligence Driving Operational Efficiency

Chewy has invested in AI technology infrastructure over recent quarters and is now implementing these systems across various operational areas, including customer service, logistics networks, and distribution centers.

Singh indicated that AI-powered operational improvements are expected to generate benefits in the “low tens of millions” during 2026, scaling to approximately $50 million or greater in annualized cost savings by 2027. The retailer is simultaneously increasing capacity at its advanced fulfillment facility in Houston as part of the comprehensive efficiency initiative.

For the first quarter of fiscal 2026, Chewy projected revenue between $3.33 billion and $3.36 billion with adjusted earnings per share ranging from $0.40 to $0.45, figures that generally matched analyst forecasts.

Veterinary Services Footprint Growing

Chewy Vet Care expanded by 10 additional locations throughout fiscal 2025, elevating the total practice count to 18 facilities. CVC presently operates across five states, with strategic plans for nationwide rollout.

Singh reported that CVC performance is surpassing internal projections regarding customer satisfaction metrics and is serving as an effective customer acquisition channel that deepens relationships with premium-tier customers. Management characterized it as the fastest-expanding business segment measured by net sales per active customer.

The company also finalized its acquisition of SmartEquine, a digital platform focused on equine health management. This transaction is projected to contribute approximately $80 million in net sales during 2026 — representing less than 1% of consolidated revenue, though it demonstrates strategic diversification beyond companion animals.

Notwithstanding Wednesday’s sharp rally, Chewy stock has declined nearly 20% over the trailing twelve months and continues trading substantially below its 52-week peak of $48.62.

As can be observed on the XAG/USD chart, the price of silver has once again dropped below the psychological $70 level. At the same time, this week has been marked by sharp fluctuations: on Monday, prices traded below $65, while as recently as yesterday, silver reached $74 per ounce.

Market volatility is being driven by ongoing geopolitical uncertainty. Conflicting statements from the United States and Iran regarding potential peace negotiations continue to unsettle financial markets. According to media reports:

→ Washington maintains that negotiations are ongoing, with the Trump administration reportedly delivering a 15-point proposal to Iran via intermediaries, aimed at resolving the conflict and reopening the Strait of Hormuz.

→ Iran, in turn, has stated that it does not intend to negotiate with the US, rejecting the proposed ceasefire and instead putting forward its own conditions.

On the morning of 19 March, analysing the XAG/USD chart, we:

→ concluded that the market was under significant pressure;
→ identified and plotted a descending channel (marked in red) on the silver price chart;
→ suggested that the channel’s median line could act as near-term resistance, thereby validating the structure.

Indeed, subsequent price action confirmed this framework, as indicated by the arrows:

→ the lower boundary acted as support on the same day;
→ yesterday, price reversed lower from the median line (which shifted from support to resistance), reinforcing the prevailing bearish sentiment observed throughout March.

From a bullish perspective:

→ the break below the 6 February low around the $64 level highlights aggressive demand — so-called “smart money” may have absorbed liquidity in this zone, positioning for higher prices;
→ silver may be in the process of forming an inverse head and shoulders pattern.

However, as long as price continues to trade below the red median line of the active channel, it would be premature to speak of any meaningful bullish conviction.

Start trading commodity CFDs with tight spreads (additional fees may apply). Open your trading account now or learn more about trading commodity CFDs with FXOpen.

This article represents the opinion of the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand only. It is not to be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation with respect to products and services provided by the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand, nor is it to be considered financial advice.

Tazapay, a cross-border payment infrastructure provider, has closed an extension to its Series B funding round, lifting total funding to $36 million. The extension was led by Circle Ventures and included participation from Coinbase Ventures, CMT Digital, Peak XV Partners and Ripple. The new capital will be used to expand digital settlement technology for cross-border payments, secure additional licenses, broaden geographic reach across Asia, Latin America, the Middle East and the Americas, and build infrastructure for what the company calls “agentic payments.”

Tazapay serves more than 1,000 enterprises and fintechs across 30 countries, and holds licenses in Singapore, Canada, Australia and the United States, with active applications underway in the European Union, United Arab Emirates and Hong Kong. “The demand we’re seeing from enterprises and fintechs across Asia, LATAM, and the Middle East is unmistakable; businesses want to move money faster, cheaper, and with full regulatory confidence,” said Kanupriya Sharda, chief business officer at Tazapay.

Cointelegraph asked Tazapay for the size of the extension tranche and the company’s valuation, but did not receive a response by publication.

Related: Ripple joins Singapore sandbox to test RLUSD in trade finance

Key takeaways

• Tazapay’s Series B extension brings total fundraising to $36 million, with Circle Ventures leading and participation from Coinbase Ventures, CMT Digital, Peak XV Partners and Ripple.
• The fresh capital targets expansion of cross-border digital settlement tech, licensing pursuits, and regional growth into Asia, LATAM, the Middle East and the Americas, plus development of “agentic payments.”
• The funding news comes against a backdrop of growing interest in stablecoin–based cross-border rails, with Ripple expanding its institutional stablecoin platform to over 60 markets and processing more than $100 billion in volume.
• Other early-stage fintechs are also scaling stablecoin–fiat payment networks, such as Conduit, which raised $36 million in May 2025 to broaden its fiat and stablecoin offerings and serve as an alternative to SWIFT.
• Regulatory licensing, interoperability, and real-world adoption remain pivotal for pushing these rails from pilots to mainstream use.

Tazapay’s expansion blueprint and regulatory footprint

According to the company, the new funding will accelerate the rollout of its cross-border settlement technology by pursuing additional licensing and expanding in key regions, including Asia, Latin America, the Middle East and the Americas. Tazapay currently maintains licenses in Singapore, Canada, Australia and the United States, with active applications in the European Union, United Arab Emirates and Hong Kong. The firm reported serving more than 1,000 enterprises and fintechs across 30 markets, underscoring growing demand for faster, cheaper, and regulation-compliant cross-border payments. The chief business officer, Kanupriya Sharda, highlighted “unmistakable” demand from enterprises and fintechs across Asia, LATAM, and the Middle East for improved money movement capabilities.

Stablecoins and the race to upgrade cross-border rails

The extension of Tazapay’s Series B comes as a wave of fintech and crypto companies push to embed stablecoins into cross-border payment workflows. Ripple, for example, has expanded Ripple Payments into an end-to-end stablecoin and fiat platform for banks and fintechs. The platform is live in more than 60 markets and has processed over $100 billion in volume, signaling a meaningful move toward institutional-grade stablecoin rails in global payments.

In the same ecosystem, regulatory and sandbox activity around stablecoins continues. For instance, Ripple recently joined Singapore’s sandbox to test RLUSD in trade finance, illustrating how regulated pilots are shaping the rollout of new settlement tools across jurisdictions.

Beyond Tazapay and Ripple, the market has seen other notable fundraising tied to cross-border rails. In May 2025, Conduit announced a $36 million Series A round led by Dragonfly and Altos Ventures to scale its fiat and stablecoin payment network, positioning the project as a potential alternative to traditional messaging corridors such as SWIFT.

These developments reflect a broader industry shift: a push to replace or augment legacy rails with programmable, regulator-friendly settlement networks built on stablecoins and crypto rails, designed to cut settlement times and costs while preserving compliance and risk controls.

What this means for readers and market watchers

For investors, Tazapay’s extension signals continued appetite for platforms that can operationalize cross-border liquidity with robust licensing and multi-jurisdictional reach. For enterprises and fintechs, the move reinforces a trend toward using stablecoin-based settlement to reduce friction in international payments while maintaining regulatory confidence. For builders, the emphasis on “agentic payments”—where payment flows can be orchestrated and automated at the edge of networks—points to a future where payment rails are more integrated with enterprise workflows and financial ecosystems.

As the sector scales, observers will want to watch licensing progress, regional execution, and the ability of these platforms to deliver truly cost-effective and faster settlement at scale. Regulatory clarity across key markets—especially around stablecoins and cross-border fintech operations—will continue to shape how quickly and broadly these rails can be adopted.

Readers should keep an eye on further disclosures from Tazapay about the extension’s size and valuation, as well as ongoing updates from Ripple, Conduit and other players as they publish new milestones and regulatory milestones in the coming quarters.

The story continues to unfold as more regional licenses, pilot programs, and enterprise deployments come online, potentially reshaping the architecture of global payments over the next few years.

If last Thursday trading was taking place below the 1.6300 level, today one euro is worth more than 1.6660 Australian dollars. The upward trend seen in recent days has been driven by a combination of factors, including:

→ Bullish factor for the euro: The European Central Bank (ECB) has revised its 2026 inflation forecast upwards (to 2.6%). The reason lies in the Middle East conflict and rising energy prices. This signals to the market that the ECB may not only refrain from cutting rates but could also begin discussing potential rate hikes this year.

→ Bearish factor for the Australian dollar: The Middle East conflict is placing significant pressure on China’s economy (which is already dealing with a property market crisis). A slowdown in trade with China is weakening the Australian currency. For more details, see the article: What Are Commodity Currencies?

However, the chart indicates that the bullish momentum is fading — this is reflected in a series of bearish divergences, with the RSI moving down from overbought territory.

Continuing the technical analysis of the EUR/AUD chart, it can be observed that price fluctuations have formed a long-term descending channel. In this context:

→ Bulls have shown initiative: after touching the lower boundary of the channel, they (as marked by arrows) gradually took control over intermediate channel levels.

→ The current situation can be interpreted as a period of short-term consolidation (with the formation of a narrowing triangle pattern). The triangle may have been broken this morning, but Australia’s inflation report came in line with expectations — and the market continues to consolidate.

If we assume that bulls manage to gather enough strength for another upward push, they may face a significant test in the form of a resistance zone:

→ the March high around the 1.6730 level;
→ the upper boundary of the descending channel.

Trade over 50 forex markets 24 hours a day with FXOpen. Take advantage of low commissions, deep liquidity, and spreads from 0.0 pips (additional fees may apply). Open your FXOpen account now or learn more about trading forex with FXOpen.

This article represents the opinion of the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand only. It is not to be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation with respect to products and services provided by the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand, nor is it to be considered financial advice.