Paul Quinn denies rape which Andrew Malkinson spent 17 years in prison for
A new suspect in the case where another man spent 17 years in prison after being said to have been wrongly convicted in connection with the alleged rape of a woman said he was ‘in shock’ when he was arrested two decades later.
Paul Quinn said he was in ‘disbelief’ when he was questioned about the attack of the woman in 2003. “Was it something you expected?,” Mr Quinn’s barrister Lisa Wilding KC asked him. “Completely unexpected,” the defendant replied.
Mr Quinn, 51, is on trial and denies the charges he faces. The alleged attack was said to have happened at a ‘remote location’ at the foot of an embankment off Cleggs Lane in Little Hulton, before 6am on July 19, 2003, near to the M61.
Get MEN Premium now for just £1 HERE – or get involved in our WhatsApp group by clicking HERE. And don’t miss out on our brilliant selection of newsletters HERE.
The defendant, who wore a black jumper, navy jeans and glasses, was giving evidence in his defence from the witness box for the first time in the trial.
Earlier in the trial, prosecutors told the jury that it was their case that another man, Andrew Malkinson, was previously wrongly convicted in relation to the incident. Mr Malkinson suffered ‘a most terrible miscarriage of justice’ after being wrongly identified as the assailant, prosecutors said.
The alleged victim had expressed ‘100 per cent confidence’ Mr Malkinson was her attacker in an ‘honestly and genuinely made’ but ‘mistaken’ identification, Manchester Crown Court has heard. Two others also picked him out in an identification parade.
Mr Malkinson had been the victim of ‘one of the worst’ miscarriages of justice ‘there has been’ and spent 17 years in prison, prosecutors told the jury.
Now, Mr Quinn – the man prosecutors claim is guilty of carrying out the alleged attack – is standing trial. Mr Quinn, of Whipton Barton Road, Exeter, denies two counts of rape and two alternative counts of indecent assault; one count of inflicting grievous bodily harm; and attempting to choke, suffocate or strangle with intent.
Ms Wilding asked Mr Quinn how he felt when he was arrested on December 13, 2022. “Incredibly scared,” he replied. Asked why, he continued: “Because of the nature of the offences they wanted to speak to me about.”
“How was your mind?,” Ms Wilding asked. “Like a rollercoaster,” the defendant said. “It was all over the place.”
He told jurors that in the interview, he told police that he had ‘copped off’ with ‘a lot of women’ around the time of the incident. Mr Quinn said that he viewed the term ‘copped off’ as anything from a ‘snog on the dancefloor’ up to ‘full sex’, and ‘everything else’ in between.
“I should have corrected them and said I copped off with a lot of women,” he said. Under cross-examination by prosecutor John Price KC, Mr Quinn denied ‘dishonestly’ exaggerating the number of women he’d had sexual intercourse with to explain DNA findings. Mr Quinn said it was a ‘misunderstanding’.
In a second police interview in May 2023, Mr Quinn told police in a prepared statement that he was ‘very promiscuous’ and was ‘sleeping with a lot of women in 2003’. “I cannot explain the DNA evidence,” the statement added. He said that he didn’t remember the alleged victim and didn’t remember ‘if I slept with her’.
Mr Price asked the defendant: “So you still say you could have had sexual intercourse with [the alleged victim] in or around 2003?” The defendant replied: “That’s what I stated in my statements, yes.”
Mr Quinn said he did not answer further questions from the police in that interview, and third and fourth interviews in March 2024 and September 2024 respectively, under advice from his legal team.
Mr Quinn said he gave officers his mobile phone PIN number, and denied there was anything he was ‘worried about’ on the device.
Proceeding.









You must be logged in to post a comment Login