Connect with us

Crypto World

Bitcoin Struggles to Reclaim $80K as Gold and Silver Rally

Published

on

Bitcoin Struggles to Reclaim $80K as Gold and Silver Rally

Bitcoin (BTC CRYPTO: BTC) drifted in a narrow corridor on Tuesday as bullion attempts to reclaim losses and risk sentiment remains mixed. The session underscored a cautious stance among traders who are weighing whether the traditional gold narrative can coexist with a staunchly range-bound crypto market, or if a shift in dynamics will spark the next leg higher for digital assets. While Bitcoin held its ground, gold and silver tried to steady after recent declines, signaling a broader cross-asset tug-of-war shaping price action across markets.

Key takeaways

  • Bitcoin traded sideways, with price action stubbornly resisting a decisive move beyond key ranges even as gold and silver attempt to claw back losses.
  • Market players remain divided on how BTC will relate to gold in the near term, reflecting evolving expectations about the crypto-gold relationship.
  • Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan argued that the current crypto winter may be closer to a conclusion than many observers expect, framing the downturn as a transitional phase rather than a structural shift.
  • Gold rebounded toward multi-month highs, lifting XAU/USD toward the vicinity of the $5,000 mark while silver also found footing after a sharp January close.
  • U.S. equities remained sensitive to earnings, with PayPal posting disappointing results that pressured its stock in afternoon trading, highlighting how macro news still influences crypto risk sentiment.

Tickers mentioned: $BTC, $PYPL

Sentiment: Neutral

Price impact: Neutral. The market shows no clear immediate impulse for BTC as it hovers near resistance while gold stabilizes, suggesting a wait-and-see stance among traders.

Market context: The session sits at a crossroads where cross-asset dynamics—crypto liquidity, gold’s role as a risk proxy, and earnings-driven stock flows—continue to shape appetite for bitcoin. Traders are watching whether a renewed risk-on phase or a fresh wave of risk-off liquidity will tilt BTC away from its current range, particularly in the wake of evolving ETF discussions and macro signals.

Advertisement

Why it matters

The current environment highlights how macro narratives can keep bitcoin from staging a decisive breakout even as traditional assets enjoy incremental recoveries. The BTC–gold dynamic has historically offered clues about how capital rotates between digital assets and real assets during macro shifts; the last 14 months have seen gold lead on several occasions, with some market entrants arguing that the digital gold narrative then takes the baton. If gold continues to recover and BTC remains tethered to near-term resistance, traders may interpret this as a normalization phase rather than a sustained downshift in crypto demand.

Analysts are mindful that a shift in sentiment could be triggered by a confluence of factors—from ETF inflows and institutional exposure to macro data releases and regulatory developments. One veteran trader noted that the relationship between BTC and gold “has cycles,” and that a revival in the gold narrative could be followed by renewed interest in digital assets, though timing remains uncertain. Others cautioned that this is the first cycle where Bitcoin has not established new highs against gold, warning that capital rotation could extend the current underperformance in BTC terms if the macro backdrop remains constrained.

On the earnings front, the broader market’s sensitivity to company results continues to ripple through crypto sentiment. A high-profile miss from a major payment processor served as a reminder that macro-visible catalysts—be they earnings surprises or regulatory headlines—still exert outsized influence on risk assets. In this context, Bitcoin’s direction may hinge less on internal crypto catalysts and more on how liquidity and risk appetite evolve amid competing macro narratives.

“I think we’re going to come roaring back sooner rather than later. Heck, it’s been winter since January 2025. Spring is surely coming soon.”

Against this backdrop, market participants are watching a spectrum of signals. Some observers point to a potential shift in leadership where the “crypto winter” gives way to a fresh cycle of accumulation and price discovery, while others argue that the resilience of the BTC–gold relationship will determine whether crypto can decouple from broader risk-off moves. The evolving dialogue among traders and asset managers underscores a market that is increasingly data-driven and sensitive to cross-asset correlations, rather than reacting to crypto-specific headlines alone.

Advertisement

XAU/USD one-hour chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView


BTC/XAU chart. Source: Jelle/X

Beyond the charts, market narrative continues to reflect a broadening spectrum of opinions about where this cycle goes next. Some analysts argue that the gold-led impulse could remain the dominant driver for a while, while others contend that bitcoin’s underlying fundamentals—such as on-chain activity and institutional interest in physically backed crypto vehicles—could catalyze a sharper bounce once liquidity conditions improve. In the absence of a clear breakout, traders often default to a cautious stance, awaiting catalysts that can move the needle on risk sentiment and cross-asset dynamics.

With Bitcoin hovering near resistance and precious metals flirting with fresh intraday strength, the immediate prognosis remains uncertain. Yet the balance of evidence suggests that the crypto market is not in isolation; it is embedded in a wider climate where macro factors, ETF flows, and narrative shifts all interact to shape the next chapter for BTC and the broader digital-asset space. The coming days will be telling as investors parse earnings, macro indicators, and policy signals that could redefine the risk calculus for crypto assets.

What to watch next

  • Bitcoin’s behavior around the $80,000 level: any retest, breakout, or sustained move will signal whether the resistance is weakening or still formidable.
  • Gold’s ability to sustain gains near $5,000 and whether silver maintains its recent advance to gauge risk-appetite shifts.
  • ETF activity and institutional exposure to Bitcoin-related products that could alter supply-demand dynamics.
  • Market commentary from asset managers and analysts on the BTC–gold relationship and potential regime changes in the crypto cycle.
  • Key earnings and macro prints that could influence risk sentiment and liquidity in the short term.

Sources & verification

  • TradingView BTCUSD price data showing BTC price action around the $80,000 resistance (as referenced with BTC price charts).
  • XAU/USD price data indicating bullion’s move toward near $4,971 and its intraday recovery.
  • PayPal Q4 2025 earnings release and related market reaction in the stock, as discussed in investor commentary and social posts.
  • Public posts from market analysts on BTC vs. gold dynamics, including commentary on historical cycles of leadership between BTC and gold.
  • Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan’s statements about the crypto cycle and the potential end of the current downturn, published in recent commentary.

Market reaction and key details

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

Ethereum Dust Attacks Have Increased Post-Fusaka

Published

on

Ethereum Dust Attacks Have Increased Post-Fusaka

Stablecoin-fueled dusting attacks are now estimated to make up 11% of all Ethereum transactions and 26% of active addresses on an average day, after the Fusaka upgrade made transactions cheaper, according to Coin Metrics. 

Ethereum is now seeing more than 2 million average daily transactions, spiking to almost 2.9 million in mid-January, along with 1.4 million daily active addresses — a 60% increase over prior averages.

The Fusaka upgrade in December made using the network cheaper and easier by improving onchain data handling, reducing the cost of posting information from layer-2 networks back to Ethereum.

Digging through the dust on Ethereum

Coin Metrics said it analyzed over 227 million balance updates for USDC (USDC) and USDt (USDT) on Ethereum from November 2025 through January 2026.

Advertisement

It found that 43% were involved in transfers of less than $1 and 38% were under a single penny — “amounts with insignificant economic purpose other than wallet seeding.”

“The number of addresses holding small ‘dust’ balances, greater than zero but less than 1 native unit, has grown sharply, consistent with millions of wallets receiving tiny poisoning deposits.”

Pre-Fusaka, stablecoin dust accounted for roughly 3 to 5% of Ethereum transactions and 15 to 20% of active addresses, it said. 

“Post-Fusaka, these figures jumped to 10-15% of transactions and 25-35% of active addresses on a typical day, a 2-3x increase.”

However, the remaining 57% of balance updates involved transfers above $1, “suggesting the majority of stablecoin activity remains organic,” Coin Metrics stated.

Median Ethereum transaction size fell sharply after Fusaka. Source: Coin Metrics

Users need to be wary of address poisoning

In January, security researcher Andrey Sergeenkov pointed to a 170% increase in new wallet addresses in the week starting Jan. 12, and also suggested it was linked to a wave of address poisoning attacks taking advantage of low gas fees

These “dusting” attacks typically involve malicious actors sending fractions of a cent worth of a stablecoin from wallet addresses that resemble legitimate ones, duping users into copying the wrong address when making a transaction.

Advertisement

Related: Ethereum activity surge could be linked to dusting attacks: Researcher

Sergeenkov said $740,000 had already been lost to address poisoning attacks. The top attacker sent nearly 3 million dust transfers for just $5,175 in stablecoin costs, according to Coin Metrics.

Dust does not represent genuine economic usage

Coin Metrics reported that approximately 250,000 to 350,000 daily Ethereum addresses are involved in stablecoin dust activity, but the majority of network growth has been genuine.  

“The majority of post-Fusaka growth reflects genuine usage, though dust activity is a factor worth noting when interpreting headline metrics.”

Magazine: DAT panic dumps 73,000 ETH, India’s crypto tax stays: Asia Express

Advertisement