Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

As stocks, bonds fall, a trade that boomed in 2022 may be winner again

Published

on

ETF Edge on the mechanics of managed futures
ETF Edge on the mechanics of managed futures

Managed future strategies are gaining renewed attention as investors look for new sources of returns from the market at a time when both stocks and bonds are under pressure as a result of the U.S.-Iran war and the risk of 1970s-style stagflation.

These strategies, which are typically run by commodity trading advisors, use systematic models to trade future contracts across different asset classes. Rather than focus on short-term market moves in traditional asset classes, they aim to capture broader trends that unfold over months. The ability to adapt to changing market conditions, and their performance back in 2022, has made managed futures funds increasingly relevant in 2026.

In 2022, when the S&P 500 Index fell around 18% and the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index was down about 13%, managed future strategies were up 20%.

That’s meaningful outperformance in an environment when stocks and bonds are under pressure,” Nate Geraci, NovaDius president, said on CNBC’s “ETF Edge” earlier this week.

Advertisement

Andrew Beer, managing member at DBi, which manages the largest managed futures ETF, the iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF), said on “ETF Edge” that the uncertainty around inflation and interest rates, and the volatile geopolitical backdrop, are a good match for the managed futures approach, which can take long or short positions and have the flexibility to respond to different trends across the markets.

Stock Chart IconStock chart icon
hide content

Performance of the iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF over the past five years.

Managed futures ETFs remain a relatively small category, collectively holding around $6.5 billion in assets, according to ETFAction.com. Within that space, the iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF has attracted about $1 billion in flows this year.

Advertisement

The use of the managed futures approach with ETFs allows more investors to access a strategy that been associated with the world of hedge funds historically, but in a more liquid and transparent structure.

“We’re leveraging the work of largest hedge funds, and trying to be more efficient, pick up what they are doing,” Beer said. “We thrive with changes over 3, 6, 9, 12 months, not Monday to Thursday,” he said.

“Certainly, the [ETF] industry is going to be launching additional managed futures products along with other hedge funds strategies,” Geraci said during the podcast portion of “ETF Edge.”

Geraci said one clear signal that this approach is likely to see more interest from retail investors is three of the biggest asset managers getting into the space with their own branded managed futures ETFs: BlackRock, Invesco and Fidelity Investments.

Advertisement

“They all entered the market in the past year and that is a sign of real investor demand going forward,” Geraci said. “The interest is there, especially given the backdrop of this market environment,” he added.

Still, managed future ETFs remain more complex than regular stock and bond investments, and investors need to understand that while their performance can beat stocks and bonds during periods of market stress and volatility, they can also lag.

“I do think these are clearly more complex than other types of ETFs on the market,” Geraci said. “Investors and advisors need to have a firm understanding of how these work,” he said. Maybe most important, he added, “Investors have to be able to stick with managed futures through inevitable periods of underperformance.”

“They can work really well when you need them, but you have to be able to let them work over full market cycles,” Geraci said.

Advertisement

Beer said investors can think of an allocation to this type of strategy being in the range of 3% to 5% of an overall market portfolio diversification approach, “just sitting there alongside hard assets or infrastructure.”

“I think we all have the same goal: we want our investors to be able to grow their assets, but sleep at night,” he said.

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

P2P.me Faces Insider Trading Allegations Over Polymarket Bets

Published

on


P2P.me, a cryptocurrency payments platform, is facing questions over a $20,000 Polymarket bet tied to its own fundraising campaign after disclosing that it traded on the outcome before the round opened publicly.

On March 27, P2P.me announced that it had liquidated a Polymarket betting position on its ability to meet its $6 million fundraising target. The company disclosed that it placed the bets 10 days before officially opening its funding round.

Big Polymarket Profit Sparks Insider Trading Debate

P2P.me admitted that, at the time the wagers were placed, it had already secured an oral commitment of $3 million from the venture capital firm Multicoin.

Some legal observers said the $3 million oral commitment could be viewed as material non-public information, though P2P.me said the absence of signed documents meant the outcome was still uncertain.

P2P.me further defended the trade and characterized the bet as a “vote of confidence.”

“We named the account “P2P Team” deliberately – to give a marketing signal of our presence to the community and reflect our intent to be transparent. But intent isn’t the same as action. Not disclosing at the time was a mistake we own. We took time to study the legal implications before speaking, which is why we stayed silent until now with a “No Comments” stance! – that too is a fair criticism,” it stated.

P2P.me eventually raised $5.2 million from outside investors, allowing the firm to close its Polymarket positions at $35,212. The trade generated a profit of roughly $14,700 from an initial entry of $20,500.

Following the backlash, some investors and industry insiders argued that the incident was being blown out of proportion. They attributed the trade to naiveté rather than malice.

Advertisement

Simon Dedic, co-founder of Moonrock Capital and an investor in P2P.me, defended the team’s character and motive. According to him, the trade was a misguided “guerrilla marketing stunt” designed to show conviction.

“No one with any common sense would risk a $6 million raise over $15,000. The idea was to show such strong conviction in the sale that they’d even bet on themselves. This is exactly why they intentionally named the account ‘P2P team.’ Otherwise, you’d have to argue they’re the most incompetent insider traders of all time,” Dedic added.

Amid mounting criticism on the eve of its planned initial coin offering, P2P.me announced that it would route the proceeds from trading to the MetaDAO Treasury. The company clarified that MetaDAO had no prior knowledge of the trades.

This incident comes at a time when prediction markets are enjoying an explosive growth in the sector. Blockchain platform TRM Labs stated that the sector’s transaction volumes have surged from $1.2 billion in early 2025 to more than $20 billion by January 2026.

Prediction Markets Monthly Volume.
Prediction Markets Monthly Volume. Source: TRM Labs

Due to this rapid growth, there have been increasing regulatory concerns about decentralized prediction markets. Platforms such as Polymarket and Kalshi have recently implemented stricter surveillance measures to curb insider trading.

The post P2P.me Faces Insider Trading Allegations Over Polymarket Bets appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Google, Banks to Back $5B Anthropic Data Center in Texas: Report

Published

on

OpenAI Wins Defense Contract After US Halts Anthropic Use

Google is preparing to support a multibillion-dollar data center project in Texas leased to Anthropic as competition for AI infrastructure accelerates.

The project, operated by Nexus Data Centers, could exceed $5 billion in its initial phase, with Google expected to provide construction loans, Financial Times reported on Friday, citing people familiar with the matter. A consortium of banks is also competing to arrange financing by mid-year, per the report.

According to the report, Anthropic recently signed a lease for the 2,800-acre campus, which forms part of its broader infrastructure tie-up with Google. Construction is already underway, supported by early-stage debt financing from Eagle Point, a publicly traded closed-end investment company.

The site is expected to deliver around 500 megawatts of capacity by late 2026, roughly equivalent to powering 500,000 homes, with potential expansion to 7.7 gigawatts. Its location is near major gas pipelines operated by companies including Enterprise Products Partners, Energy Transfer and Atmos Energy, allowing the project to rely on on-site gas turbines.

Advertisement

Related: David Sacks’ 130-day term as Trump’s crypto and AI czar has ended

Judge blocks Pentagon ban on Anthropic

On Thursday, a US federal judge in San Francisco temporarily blocked the Pentagon from labeling Anthropic a national security risk and halting government use of its AI tools. Judge Rita Lin granted a preliminary injunction, pausing a directive backed by President Donald Trump that sought to cut off federal use of Anthropic’s chatbot, Claude.

The ruling came in a lawsuit filed by Anthropic, which argued that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth overstepped his authority by designating the company a supply chain risk. The judge described the government’s actions as “arbitrary” and warned against branding a US company as a threat without clear legal basis.

The dispute followed a breakdown in negotiations between Anthropic and the Pentagon over the military use of its AI. The company resisted allowing its models to be used for lethal autonomous weapons or mass surveillance, leading to a broader standoff with the administration.

Advertisement
Source: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth

In her decision, Lin said the government may have retaliated against Anthropic for its public stance, calling the measures a likely violation of First Amendment protections.

Related: CFTC Chair Selig says blockchain could help verify AI-generated content

US military used Anthropic AI in Iran strike

As Cointelegraph reported, US military units reportedly used Anthropic’s Claude AI model during a major airstrike on Iran, even after the ban order by Trump. Military commands, including US Central Command (CENTCOM) in the Middle East, reportedly used the AI model for operational support

Magazine: Bitcoin may take 7 years to upgrade to post-quantum — BIP-360 co-author