Crypto gambling has grown steadily over the past few years, and 2026 has brought more competition to the space than ever. Stake.com remains one of the biggest names in the industry, but it is no longer the only platform drawing serious attention. ZunaBet entered the market this year and has quickly become a talking point among crypto gamblers. This comparison looks at both platforms across bonuses, game selection, loyalty rewards, and overall value.

What Stake.com Brings to the Table

Stake.com has been around since 2017. It operates under a Curaçao license and has grown into one of the most visited crypto gambling sites in the world. The platform covers both casino games and sports betting, with support for Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Dogecoin, and several other cryptocurrencies.

A big part of Stake’s identity is its library of original games. Titles like Plinko, Crash, Mines, and Dice are provably fair and have developed a loyal following. Outside of originals, Stake carries slots and live dealer tables from well-known providers including Pragmatic Play, Hacksaw Gaming, and Evolution.

The sportsbook side covers major leagues and sports globally, including football, basketball, tennis, MMA, and a solid esports section. Stake has earned a reputation for sharp odds and a straightforward betting experience.

Where Stake stands apart from most competitors is its approach to bonuses. There is no welcome bonus. No deposit match, no free spins for signing up. Instead, Stake operates an invite-only VIP program where rewards are unlocked based on wagering volume over time. Benefits at higher tiers include rakeback, weekly and monthly bonuses, and tailored offers. This setup favors players who are already planning to bet frequently and in larger amounts.

What ZunaBet Offers as a Newcomer

ZunaBet went live in 2026 under the ownership of Strathvale Group Ltd. It holds an Anjouan gaming license and was built by a team with more than 20 years of combined experience in online gambling. The platform was designed from the ground up as crypto-first, meaning crypto is the primary way to deposit and withdraw rather than a secondary option bolted onto a fiat system.

The game library is hard to ignore. ZunaBet lists over 11,000 games from 63 different providers. That roster includes Pragmatic Play, Hacksaw Gaming, Yggdrasil, BGaming, and Evolution, covering slots, table games, and live dealer options. With 60+ providers feeding into one platform, the variety is among the widest available in the crypto casino market right now.

Sports betting is fully integrated. The sportsbook covers football, basketball, tennis, NHL, and combat sports, along with esports markets for CS2, Dota 2, League of Legends, and Valorant. Virtual sports are included too. Everything sits under one account, so switching between casino and sports is seamless.

ZunaBet supports more than 20 cryptocurrencies. The list includes BTC, ETH, USDT on multiple chains, SOL, DOGE, ADA, XRP, and others. The platform charges no processing fees on its end, and withdrawals are built to process quickly. Apps are available for iOS, Android, Windows, and MacOS, and live chat support runs around the clock.

Welcome Bonus: A Clear Split

The most obvious difference between these two platforms is what happens when you first sign up.

Stake gives you nothing upfront. There is no deposit match and no free spins. You start playing, and if you wager enough over time, you may eventually get invited into the VIP program. That works for a certain type of player, but it asks for commitment before giving anything back.

ZunaBet goes in the other direction with a welcome package worth up to $5,000 plus 75 free spins. It breaks down like this: the first deposit is matched at 100% up to $2,000 with 25 free spins, the second deposit is matched at 50% up to $1,500 with 25 spins, and the third deposit is matched at 100% up to $1,500 with another 25 spins. Spreading the bonus across three deposits keeps players coming back rather than dumping everything into one session.

For anyone who wants value from day one, ZunaBet has the clear edge here. A $5,000 bonus ceiling gives players real room to explore the library and sportsbook with extra funds backing them up.

Loyalty Rewards: Open vs Invite-Only

Stake runs a closed VIP system. Players are invited based on their activity, and the exact thresholds are not publicly listed. Once you are in, the rewards — rakeback, reload bonuses, and personalized offers — can be significant. But if you are a casual or mid-level player, you may never see the inside of that program.

ZunaBet handles loyalty differently. Its system is themed around dragon evolution and has six named tiers: Squire, Warden, Champion, Divine, Knight, and Ultimate. Rakeback starts at 1% at the lowest level and climbs to 20% at the top. Other perks include up to 1,000 free spins depending on tier, VIP club access, double wheel spins, and a gamified experience built around a dragon mascot called Zuno.

The important distinction is that ZunaBet’s system is transparent and open to everyone from the start. You can see the tiers, see the rewards, and track your own progress. There is no guessing about whether you qualify or waiting for an invitation that may not come. For most players, that openness is more motivating than a mystery system operating behind the scenes.

The Crypto Advantage Over Traditional Operators

Both Stake and ZunaBet sit firmly in the crypto camp, which already separates them from traditional operators like DraftKings, BetMGM, FanDuel, and Caesars. Those platforms were built around bank transfers, credit cards, and regulated fiat currencies. Withdrawals can take days. Fees add up. Payment options are limited by region.

Crypto platforms skip most of that. Transactions are faster, fees are lower, and players have more control over their funds. ZunaBet pushes this further with support for 20+ coins and zero platform processing fees. For players who already live in the crypto world, this is how they expect a gambling platform to work.

Traditional platforms still hold advantages in terms of regulatory trust and brand recognition in markets like the US and UK. But for players outside those tightly regulated markets, or for anyone who simply prefers crypto, platforms like Stake and ZunaBet are the more practical choice.

Where Things Stand

Stake.com has years of trust built up. It has a massive user base, a recognizable brand, and a VIP system that delivers real value to its most active players. If you already know you are going to wager heavily and consistently, Stake rewards that over time.

ZunaBet is making a pitch to everyone else — and doing it well. A generous welcome bonus, a game library with over 11,000 titles, broad crypto support, and a loyalty program that does not hide behind an invite wall add up to a compelling package. It feels built for the current moment, designed for players who grew up with crypto and expect their gambling platform to reflect that.

Stake set the standard for crypto casinos. ZunaBet is showing what the next version of that standard could look like — more games, better upfront value, and a rewards system that treats every player like they matter from the first deposit. For anyone shopping for a new platform in 2026, ZunaBet is the one generating the most buzz right now.

Disclaimer: This is a Press Release provided by a third party who is responsible for the content. Please conduct your own research before taking any action based on the content.

TLDR:

• Ethereum secures 61.4% of tokenized assets, reaching $206.2 billion in total market value globally.
• Tokenized asset market cap on Ethereum has grown over 40% year over year.
• Institutional voices point to blockchain adoption across equities, bonds, and real estate markets.
• Market data shows Ethereum leading infrastructure for tokenization and stablecoin settlement.

Ethereum accounts for 61.4% of all tokenized assets, totaling $206.2 billion in value. Data from Token Terminal shows steady expansion, with the network’s tokenized asset market cap rising more than 40% year over year.

Ethereum’s Expanding Role in Tokenized Markets

Recent data shared by Coin Bureau on X places Ethereum at the center of tokenized asset activity. The post notes that over $206.2 billion worth of assets currently settle on the network. This figure represents more than half of the global tokenized asset market.

The growth rate also stands out. Token Terminal data shows a year-over-year increase exceeding 40%. This trend reflects rising adoption across financial applications using blockchain infrastructure. As a result, Ethereum continues to lead in both scale and activity within this segment.

The data arrives during a period of steady development within the Ethereum ecosystem. Market participants have observed increased focus on practical use cases rather than long-term theoretical upgrades. This shift appears to align with the broader expansion in tokenized asset value recorded over the past year.

At the same time, tokenization continues to gain attention across financial sectors. Market data suggests that institutions are exploring blockchain systems to represent traditional assets digitally. Ethereum remains a primary platform for these activities due to its established infrastructure.

Market Voices Point to Growing Tokenization Demand

Comments shared by Etherealize on X feature insights from Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan. He describes Ethereum as a leading network for both stablecoins and tokenized assets. According to Hougan, recent developments show a stronger focus on market-driven outcomes.

He also points to broader financial trends supporting tokenization. Statements referenced include views from regulators and asset managers who expect blockchain-based systems to expand. These perspectives reflect growing institutional attention toward tokenized markets.

Hougan compares the current stage of tokenization to early skepticism around exchange-traded funds. He notes similarities in adoption patterns, where gradual acceptance leads to wider use over time. The comparison suggests a familiar path of market development within financial innovation.

The discussion also touches on the scale of traditional markets. Equities, bonds, and real estate collectively represent large asset classes.

Tokenization offers a method to represent these assets on blockchain networks. Ethereum’s current share positions it as a key infrastructure layer for this transition.

Meanwhile, the network’s 61.4% share indicates continued concentration of activity. As tokenized markets expand, Ethereum remains closely tied to this growth.

Data from Token Terminal provides a snapshot of current positioning, while market commentary reflects ongoing developments across the sector.

TLDR:

• S&P 500 posts fifth weekly loss as RSI drops below 30, signaling oversold market conditions.
• Traders cite past crash patterns showing brief rallies before deeper declines in similar setups.
• Iran conflict raises oil disruption fears, adding pressure to already weakening market sentiment.
• Futures suggest a steady open near 6,400 despite growing bearish calls across trading circles.

The S&P 500 ended Friday at 6,368.85 after falling 1.7%, marking its fifth weekly loss in a row. Market signals show growing stress as geopolitical tension and technical indicators combine, leaving traders split on whether a deeper drop or short-term rebound comes next.

Technical Signals Stir Bearish Expectations

Recent market data shows the S&P 500 nearing correction territory after a steady decline over several weeks. The index has now dropped close to 9% from recent highs, raising caution among traders tracking historical patterns.

Relative Strength Index readings have fallen below 30, placing the market in oversold territory. Such levels previously appeared during major downturns, including the 2008 financial crisis and the 2020 pandemic-driven selloff. These comparisons have increased concern among market participants watching for similar price behavior.

Traders have intensified the bearish narrative. A widely shared message from Rekt Fencer warned of an imminent crash, urging traders to exit positions quickly. Another account, Midas, echoed a similar sentiment, reinforcing fears of a sharp decline.

Meanwhile, Ted Pillows outlined historical cycles where initial declines were followed by short rallies before deeper drops.

According to his analysis, past crashes in 2008 and 2020 followed this pattern, with brief recoveries preceding larger sell-offs.

He noted that the current market has already declined about 9%, with potential for a temporary bounce before another leg down.

These views have gained traction as traders compare current price action to earlier downturn structures. However, not all participants agree with the bearish outlook, creating a divided market environment.

Geopolitical Tension and Market Uncertainty

The ongoing two-month conflict involving the United States and Iran has added pressure to financial markets. Concerns about potential oil supply disruptions continue to influence sentiment, especially as energy prices remain sensitive to geopolitical developments.

Rising oil prices could contribute to inflation concerns, which may affect monetary policy expectations. Investors are closely monitoring how these external factors interact with existing market weakness. As a result, volatility has increased across major indices.

Despite the negative sentiment, some analysts point to the oversold condition as a possible setup for a short-term rebound.

Historically, markets often experience relief rallies after extended declines, especially when technical indicators reach extreme levels.

S&P 500 futures suggest a relatively stable open near 6,400, indicating that immediate panic selling may not materialize. This has led some traders to expect a temporary recovery before any further downside movement.

At the same time, uncertainty remains elevated as market participants weigh technical signals against geopolitical risks. With both bearish and neutral expectations in play, trading activity continues to reflect caution rather than consensus.

TLDR:

• Ripple rebranded GTreasury as Ripple Treasury, connecting 13,000 banks and 1,000+ corporate clients globally.
  
• The platform processes $12.5 trillion annually, with zero percent currently settled through crypto rails.
  
• A 1% migration of payment volume to XRPL would generate $125 billion in new on-chain annual volume.
  
• With 769M XRP locked in ETFs and rising utility demand, supply tightening may reshape XRP market dynamics.
  

Ripple’s acquisition of GTreasury, rebranded as Ripple Treasury, positions XRP at the center of a massive corporate payment shift.

The platform connects 13,000 banks and serves over 1,000 corporate clients, including Volvo, Subway, and Stihl. Together, these clients process $12.5 trillion in annual payments.

Currently, none of that volume moves through crypto. Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has identified this gap as the company’s core opportunity going forward.

Ripple Treasury Targets Corporate Finance With Full-Stack Blockchain Integration

The Ripple Treasury platform covers the full scope of corporate treasury operations. It handles payments, cash forecasting, netting, reconciliation, risk management, liquidity, and regulatory reporting.

Corporations using it do not need to learn blockchain technology at all. The system works exactly like traditional treasury software on the surface.

ClearConnect bridges the platform to banks and ERP systems on one side. Ripple’s blockchain stack sits on the other, covering wallet, custody, payments, prime, and compliance functions.

The settlement layer shifts from correspondent banking to the XRP Ledger quietly. Users experience no change in workflow, while speed and cost change significantly.

X Finance Bull noted on X that the gap between price and infrastructure has never been wider. The post pointed out that $12.5 trillion in annual volume currently sits at 0% crypto penetration.

That volume is now directly connected to Ripple’s payment rails. The migration pathway is already in place through the platform’s architecture.

The transition does not require corporate clients to adopt new interfaces or change existing workflows. Instead, the settlement layer underneath gradually shifts to XRPL.

This approach lowers adoption friction for large enterprises considerably. It also makes XRP’s role in the process nearly invisible to end users.

Supply Tightening and Volume Growth Could Reshape XRP Market Dynamics

On the investment side, 769 million XRP is currently locked in exchange-traded funds. Seven funds hold a combined $1.1 billion in assets under management.

This reduces the circulating supply available on open markets. Tighter supply alongside growing utility tends to affect price over time.

Even a 1% migration of the $12.5 trillion pipeline to XRPL would add $125 billion in annual volume. That level of on-chain activity would be unprecedented for the XRP network.

Liquidity depth, transaction demand, and market interest would all respond to that scale. The network effects from such a shift would be substantial.

XRP is currently trading at $1.31, while the infrastructure supporting it continues to expand. The contrast between that price and the scale of Ripple’s enterprise buildout is drawing attention from analysts.

More institutional volume flowing through XRPL could alter how the market values the asset. The platform is now positioned to test that thesis directly.

TLDR:

• Coinbase risks losing $1.35B in annual revenue if the CLARITY Act’s passive yield ban passes as written.
  
• White House Crypto Adviser Patrick Witt warned Coinbase to stop blocking the bill or face losing the deal entirely.
  
• JPMorgan’s Dimon publicly clashed with Coinbase’s Armstrong at Davos 2026 over the CLARITY Act’s stablecoin terms.
  
• Coinbase charges a 35% commission on staking rewards, making yield protections central to its entire business model.

The CLARITY Act is at the center of a heated debate between Coinbase and U.S. lawmakers. As the Senate Banking Committee prepares to release the full draft of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025, Coinbase has raised “significant concerns” about stablecoin yield provisions.

Critics argue the exchange is stalling the largest crypto legislation in U.S. history. Supporters say Coinbase is protecting both its business and the broader crypto ecosystem.

Coinbase’s Revenue at Risk as Yield Ban Looms

The latest Senate draft includes a provision that bans “passive yield” on stablecoin balances. This means platforms cannot pay users simply for holding stablecoins. Only narrow, activity-based rewards may survive under the current language.

The financial stakes for Coinbase are substantial. The exchange and its partner Circle earned roughly $2.75 billion gross in 2025 from interest on U.S. Treasuries backing USDC. Circle retains the gross earnings but forwards over 60% to Coinbase.

Coinbase pockets all on-platform rewards and around 50% from other sources. This adds up to an estimated $1.35 billion, representing nearly 19% of its total 2025 revenue. A ban on passive yield could eliminate that income almost entirely.

Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal made the company’s position clear. “My memory is a little better than to trust future rogue regulators to faithfully apply the law,” Grewal said. His concern centers on vague bill language that future regulators could later use against the industry.

The exchange is now drafting a counterproposal. It aims to preserve sustainable rewards programs while still supporting most of the CLARITY Act’s other provisions, including DeFi rules and SEC/CFTC jurisdiction clarity.

White House Issues Warning as Political Window Narrows

White House Crypto Adviser Patrick Witt issued a direct warning to Coinbase over its position on the bill. Witt did not mince words, stating plainly: “BLOCK IT… AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS.”

He used a football analogy, comparing Coinbase to a quarterback holding the ball too long while the pocket collapses.

His message was straightforward: pass the best deal available now or risk losing everything. The administration has made clear it wants crypto legislation finalized during this favorable window. Delay, in their view, could result in a far less friendly regulatory environment later.

The tension between Coinbase and Washington became public earlier at Davos in January 2026. JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon confronted Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong at a private coffee meeting.

Dimon reportedly told Armstrong directly, “You are full of s—,” accusing the exchange of lying about banks quietly gutting the CLARITY Act.

The irony in that confrontation is hard to miss. In July 2025, JPMorgan and Coinbase announced a major partnership.

Chase customers can now link bank accounts to Coinbase wallets, use credit cards for trades, and transfer reward points into crypto.

The public conflict between both firms, therefore, raises broader questions about how much of the drama is strategic.

Private deals and public disputes often serve different purposes in high-stakes legislative battles. The next draft of the CLARITY Act, expected next week, will reveal how much ground either side has gained.

TLDR:

• Eli Ben-Sasson claims StarkWare invented and productized most ZK technology used across blockchains today.
• Starknet has formally proved its ZK-VM security, a step most competing blockchain teams have not completed.
• Over $1.5 trillion has been processed across Starknet systems without additional oversight committees or safety rails.
• Version 0.14.2 brings privacy features and ZK-threads, expanding zero-knowledge access to any operator choosing the network.

ZK technology has come under scrutiny as debate grows among the Canton, Ethereum, and Solana ecosystems. Eli Ben-Sasson, co-founder of Zcash and StarkWare, publicly addressed concerns about zero-knowledge proof safety.

He argued that Starknet stands as the most secure blockchain ever built. Ben-Sasson cited years of battle-tested deployment, formal security proofs, and over $1.5 trillion processed across systems. His remarks came amid broader industry questions about ZK’s reliability in financial infrastructure.

Starknet’s Foundation in Zero-Knowledge Proof Innovation

Ben-Sasson stated that StarkWare invented most ZK technology that other teams embrace today. The team was also the first to bring this technology into full production.

Starknet also built the first zero-knowledge virtual machine considered safest in the industry. These claims place Starknet ahead of competitors in ZK development timelines.

Beyond invention, Ben-Sasson emphasized that Starknet formally proved the security of its ZK-VM. This formal verification is a step that many other blockchain teams have not completed.

As a result, the system carries a level of mathematical certainty not found elsewhere. This sets a clear standard for how ZK security should be approached.

In his post on X, Ben-Sasson stated that StarkWare productized ZK technology first and formally proved its ZK-VM security. These words reflect confidence backed by a multi-year operational history.

The team has processed over $1.5 trillion across multiple systems and use cases. That volume adds weight to the argument for Starknet’s reliability.

Furthermore, Ben-Sasson noted that Starknet operates without additional rails, checks, or oversight committees. If a ZK-STARK proof confirms a state transition, the system executes it directly.

This approach reflects total confidence in the underlying cryptographic proof system. No other team, he argued, runs ZK infrastructure this way.

Version 0.14.2 and the Reality of Software Risk

Starknet’s version 0.14.2 introduces privacy features and ZK-threads to a broader operator base. This update puts ZK technology directly in the hands of any operator who chooses to use it.

The move marks a step toward wider adoption of zero-knowledge proofs in real applications. It also reflects the system’s maturity after years of live deployment.

However, Ben-Sasson was careful not to claim complete immunity from software bugs. He drew parallels to airplanes, cars, and pacemakers, all of which carry inherent risk.

Yet, the industry manages that risk through audits, best-in-class products, and battle-tested systems. Starknet, he argues, meets all three criteria.

The same logic applies to ZK technology used in financial infrastructure. Ben-Sasson acknowledged that any new software technology may contain bugs.

That transparency adds credibility to his broader argument about Starknet’s security. It also reflects how mature technology companies communicate risk to users.

In that context, Starknet’s track record across $1.5 trillion in transactions carries real weight. The formal security proofs and years of operation distinguish it from newer, less-tested alternatives.

Operators and users looking for reliable ZK infrastructure have a clear reference point. Ben-Sasson’s message, though direct, is grounded in measurable outcomes.

TLDR:

• Visa joins Canton Network as the first major payments company to serve as a Super Validator among 40 nodes.
  
• Canton’s configurable privacy model lets banks adopt blockchain without exposing salaries, positions, or sensitive data.
  
• Visa’s stablecoin settlement has hit a $4.6B annualized run rate across 130-plus programs in over 50 countries.
  
• JPMorgan, Franklin Templeton, and the DTCC have all expanded onto Canton, signaling strong institutional blockchain adoption.

Visa has officially joined Canton Network as the first major global payments company to serve as a Super Validator.

The move places Visa among 40 validators responsible for running the layer-1 blockchain. Banks and financial institutions can now access privacy-preserving infrastructure for on-chain payments.

The decision builds on Visa’s growing digital asset portfolio, which already spans stablecoin settlement and card programs across more than 50 countries globally.

Visa Brings Institutional-Grade Trust to Canton Network

Canton Network was built to solve a specific problem that has kept banks away from public blockchains. Many institutions have long cited privacy as a major barrier to moving financial activity on-chain.

The network uses a configurable privacy model that keeps transaction details confidential between parties. This design allows banks to participate in blockchain infrastructure without exposing sensitive data to the broader network.

As a Super Validator, Visa will carry voting powers that shape key decisions on the Canton Network. The company has committed to applying the same operational standards it uses in its global payment systems.

Rubail Birwadker, Visa’s global head of growth products and strategic partnerships, spoke directly to the issue. He stated that “many banks see the lack of privacy as a dealbreaker for moving meaningful activity on-chain.”

Birwadker further added that Visa is “bringing Visa-grade trust, governance and operational rigor” to privacy-preserving blockchain infrastructure.

He noted that regulated institutions can now bring payments on-chain without rethinking their existing risk and compliance frameworks.

The statement reflects how seriously Visa views its governance role on the network. It also signals a long-term commitment to institutional blockchain infrastructure beyond just payments processing.

Visa’s stablecoin settlement activity has already reached an annualized run rate of $4.6 billion globally. The company also operates stablecoin-linked card programs spanning more than 130 programs in over 50 countries.

This existing foundation made Canton a practical next step in its digital asset strategy. The Super Validator role extends that work into blockchain governance and infrastructure management.

Major Financial Institutions Are Expanding on Canton Network

Visa is not alone in bringing institutional credibility to the Canton Network. JPMorgan’s Kinexys unit announced plans to launch its JPM Coin on Canton the same day Visa made its move.

JPM Coin is a USD-denominated deposit token that enables institutional clients to make payments digitally. The token was initially launched on Base, Coinbase’s Ethereum layer-2 network, before expanding to Canton.

Franklin Templeton has also expanded its tokenized fund platform, Benji, to the Canton Network. In December, the Depository Trust & Clearing Company said it would issue tokenized securities on Canton as well.

The DTCC processes quadrillions of dollars in transactions annually, making its participation particularly noteworthy. Each of these moves adds further weight to Canton’s position in institutional blockchain infrastructure.

Canton’s native CC token has responded positively to the wave of institutional announcements. The token is up more than 3% over the past day, trading at a recent price of $0.145.

Its market capitalization now stands above $5.5 billion, placing it 21st among all cryptocurrencies by that metric. Data from CoinGecko confirmed the ranking, reflecting growing market confidence in the network.

The concentration of major financial players on Canton reflects a broader shift in how institutions approach blockchain. Banks are moving from observation to active participation, with privacy as the primary enabler.

Visa’s Super Validator role adds another layer of operational credibility to the network. Canton appears to be emerging as the preferred infrastructure layer for regulated, on-chain financial activity.

OnePay, the Walmart-backed fintech initiative, has broadened its nascent crypto platform with more than a dozen new tokens. The expansion follows a rapid early-year rollout that introduced BTC and ETH and signals the company’s push to offer a curated, utility-focused crypto experience to its broad US customer base.

In its latest move, OnePay added SUI, POL and ARB to the platform’s growing roster just days after listing ten other tokens, including Solana (SOL), Cardano (ADA), Bitcoin Cash (BCH) and PAX Gold (PAXG). Ron Rojany, OnePay’s general manager for Core App & Crypto, told Cointelegraph that the additions meet a “high bar” set by the platform’s customers and by the broader fintech mission OnePay is pursuing.

Since its January debut, the platform has aimed to blend everyday financial services with crypto access, positioning OnePay as a US analogue to a “superapp” in the mold of China’s WeChat. Beyond the crypto marketplace, OnePay already provides high-yield savings, cards, loans and even a digital wallet that can be used at Walmart stores or on the retailer’s online storefront. The integration with Walmart’s ecosystem reinforces the platform’s emphasis on convenience, trust and ease of use for customers who are new to digital assets.

Walmart’s footprint looms large in the background: the retailer reported net sales of $462.4 billion in its fiscal 2025 annual report, underscoring the scale available to a highly integrated fintech offering that can cross-sell traditional financial services with digital asset access. “We’re still early and our focus is on building our crypto platform the right way: creating a trusted, safe and intuitive experience for everyday customers,” Rojany said in describing the approach to asset selection and platform expansion.

Key takeaways

• OnePay has expanded its token list to include SUI, POL and ARB shortly after listing ten other assets, highlighting a rapid, programmatic rollout rather than a single–shot launch.
• The platform emphasizes a curated set of assets—chosen for demand, liquidity, regulatory clarity and long-term utility—over chasing the hottest new token.
• The expansion aligns with OnePay’s broader “superapp” strategy, positioning it as a financial services hub that blends traditional banking features with crypto access within Walmart’s ecosystem.
• Industry context shows parallel efforts toward crypto superapps, with Coinbase detailing a broader, card- and rewards-enabled vision and regulators signaling a pathway for multi-service platforms under a unified framework.

OnePay’s token expansion: a curated path to retail crypto adoption

The latest wave of token onboarding continues a deliberate strategy. Since its beta launch earlier this year, OnePay has prioritized assets that offer real utility and practical use cases for its customers. The newly added SUI, POL and ARB join a line-up that already included established names such as BTC and ETH, marking a notable broadening of the platform’s capabilities in a relatively short period.

Rojany described the expansion as part of a thoughtful, demand-driven approach. “We plan on continuing to expand thoughtfully, prioritizing assets that meet a high bar: demand, liquidity, regulatory clarity and long-term utility,” he said in an email to Cointelegraph. He stressed that OnePay’s goal isn’t to chase every new token but to offer a curated set that aligns with how customers actually think about and use their money.

While OnePay has not disclosed precise user adoption metrics, Rojany highlighted robust engagement among those who are newer to crypto and looking for an integrated, easy-entry path. The fintech’s emphasis on an intuitive experience—paired with the trusted Walmart brand—aims to reduce friction that often accompanies crypto onboarding for mainstream users.

Superapps in the spotlight: policy, partnerships and the path forward

The push toward “superapps” — platforms that combine banking, payments, lending, investing and even on-chain services under one roof — is a broader fintech trend that OnePay is helping to crystallize in the US. In parallel developments, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong outlined plans to build a crypto-centric superapp that bundles cards, payments and Bitcoin rewards with traditional banking services, signaling a competitive market for integrated fintech offerings.

Regulatory momentum around the concept gained attention when U.S. regulators signaled a more permissive stance toward multi-service platforms. In September, Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Paul Atkins articulated support for platforms capable of delivering diverse financial services within a single regulatory framework, framing it as a way to modernize financial infrastructure while maintaining safeguards. “I have directed the Commission staff to develop further guidance and proposals ultimately to make this ‘super-app’ vision a reality,” Atkins said in a speech that underscored the agency’s interest in enabling such platforms under clear rules.

The regulatory backdrop also includes cross-border examples and corporate partnerships that illustrate how superapps could operate in practice. For instance, Japan’s Startale Group unveiled a $50 million Series A to advance its own superapp ambitions — integrating payments, asset management and on-chain services within a single interface. These moves reflect a broader shift toward unified financial experiences that blend fiat and digital assets under one operational framework.

OnePay’s strategy sits within this larger ecosystem. By leveraging Walmart’s scale and customer base, the platform has a stronger potential to drive mainstream crypto adoption through a familiar retail channel. The company’s approach also reflects a growing consensus among executives and policymakers that multi-service platforms can deliver practical benefits if they adhere to clear regulatory guardrails and prioritize user protection.

What this means for users, investors and the evolving crypto interface

For everyday users, OnePay’s expansion could lower barriers to entry for those curious about crypto but wary of complexity. The curated asset list, combined with a trusted shopping and payment experience at Walmart, offers a tangible pathway from fiat to digital assets—without requiring users to navigate a sea of exchanges, wallets and unfamiliar security practices. The inclusion of well-known tokens alongside newer ecosystems suggests a balanced strategy that favors liquidity and real-world use cases over novelty alone.

From an investment and market perspective, the move illustrates how large consumer-facing platforms are positioning crypto as a natural extension of everyday financial tooling. It also raises questions about how such platforms will manage regulatory compliance across asset types, especially as more tokens with varying usage models enter retail channels. The emphasis on demand, liquidity and regulatory clarity suggests OnePay is betting on a stable, auditable expansion rather than rapid, opaque growth. Stakeholders will be watching closely to see how the platform handles risk controls, custody, and customer education as token offerings continue to scale.

For the wider market, the OnePay example underscores a broader shift toward mainstreaming crypto within traditional financial ecosystems. If the “superapp” model proves viable at scale, it could reshape how consumers access, manage and interact with digital assets, weaving crypto into daily spending, savings and payments. Yet uncertainties remain, including how such platforms will be regulated in practice, how they will ensure consumer protection across a broader asset universe, and how retail adoption metrics will evolve over the next several quarters.

As OnePay navigates these questions, readers should monitor the cadence of token additions, regulatory guidance on multi-service platforms and the degree to which Walmart’s network amplifies crypto engagement. The convergence of retail power, user-friendly crypto access and clarified regulatory expectations could set a new baseline for what a crypto-enabled fintech looks like in the United States.

Further reading and context around similar superapp explorations include coverage of BNP Paribas’s recent crypto ETN launches for retail clients in France and ongoing discussions about how platforms can broaden access to digital assets within a regulated framework. The sector’s trajectory depends on the balance between expanding utility and maintaining strong safeguards as more mainstream audiences become part of the crypto narrative.