Reform UK is a party that exists because the Conservatives weren’t right-wing enough. Restore Britain, meanwhile, is a party that exists because Reform UK weren’t right-wing enough.

The problem for the three parties is that they agree on most issues, so they have to find increasingly niche topics to stand out from one another. This is what led to the following:

We are a pro-dog political party.

— Restore Britain (@RestoreBritain_) March 30, 2026

To be clear, this isn’t niche because it’s a minority opinion; it’s niche because political parties don’t need to clarify that dogs should not be executed.

Ordinarily, this post would have warranted little more than a shrug. The reason it’s drawn people’s attention is because Restore leader Rupert Lowe once had his dog put down by shotgun.

According to him, however, he did it in a pro-dog fashion.

Rupert Lowe, shotweiller

According to the Standard, Lowe had 17-year-old dog euthanized by shotgun. If you’re worried this makes him sound like a serial killer, don’t worry; he didn’t take the shot himself. Instead, man of the people Lowe had his groundskeeper pull the trigger.

This is what Lowe told the Mail on Sunday:

My keeper shot our dog the other day. He was a Labrador of 17. Dogs do go through ups and downs for a bit, but in the end Cromwell’s back legs went and our keeper Kevin very kindly did the job.

Cromwell didn’t go anywhere, he wasn’t away from home and he wouldn’t have known anything about it. So much kinder. They are not driven to the vet, they don’t smell the vet, it’s just all over very quickly.

Obviously it’s hard to put yourself in Lowe’s shoes, because most of us don’t have grounds or groundskeepers.

And, there are same-day pet euthanization services in the UK. This would have been slower, obviously, but it would have saved Lowe having to tell people he had an employee merc his own pet.

Speaking on having his man make the kill, Lowe said:

I would find it difficult, which is why my keeper did it. So you can call me a coward on that basis, if you want.

I’ve got friends who can shoot their dogs. [They] just take them on a walk, put a shooting rifle at the back of their head and bang, done. They don’t feel anything. I would have found it hard. He was 17 and had been with us that long.

I would be proud to tell you it was me who did it, [but] I can’t claim that credit.

Poverty can’t buy you many things, but it does afford you the luxury of never having to say the above.

Commenters had a field day with all this, anyway:

The pending community note. 🤣 pic.twitter.com/demelYn5Om

— Mukhtar (@I_amMukhtar) March 31, 2026

Restore Britain is very funny tbh. It’s literally just a party for the insane and incoherent nonsense that chronically online fascists believe and appeals to exactly no one else.

— cez (@cezthesocialist) March 31, 2026

Niche politics

If you’re wondering why Restore Britain are talking up dogs, it’s because – you guessed it – ‘foreigners’:

🚨NEW: Rupert Lowe:

“If a foreigner doesn’t want to live in a dog-living country, I’ll pay for their taxi to the airport myself.”

Advertisement

— GB Politics (@GBPolitcs) March 30, 2026

Let’s be real; we live in a country that has many problems, so most of us aren’t worried about who does or doesn’t love dogs.

You know who does have time to worry, though?

That’s right – rich people with no problems of their own.

Rich people who are wealthy enough to pay staff to shoot their pets.

Featured image via Parliament

King Charles III and Queen Camilla with US President Donald Trump and his wife, First Lady Melania Trump, at Windsor Castle last year (Alamy)

3 min read34 min

The US trip has been expected for some time, and the palace confirmed on Tuesday that it will go ahead to “celebrate the historic connections and the modern bilateral relationship” between the countries and mark the 250th anniversary of US independence.

It will be the first UK state visit to the US since Queen Elizabeth II visited in 2007.

The King and Queen will attend a state dinner at the White House, with the King also expected to deliver an address to Congress.

The announcement comes at an awkward moment in UK-US relations, however, with Trump having repeatedly criticised Starmer in recent weeks over his refusal to commit the UK to greater involvement in the US and Israel’s war with Iran.

Trump attacked Starmer after the UK refused to permit the use of British bases for initial US-Israel strikes on Iran earlier this year.

Since then, the UK government has granted the US permission to use British bases for what it describes as defensive strikes on Tehran. However, Starmer has refused to go further, reiterating on Monday that the conflict in the Middle East is “not our [the UK’s] war”.

UK veterans were also angered by Trump’s comment in January that UK troops had stayed a “little back, a little off the front lines” in the war in Afghanistan, which appeared to downplay the UK’s military involvement.

On Tuesday, Trump suggested that it will be up to the UK and other countries to re-open the Strait of Hormuz — the vital shipping lane that has been brought to an effective standstill by the war — and accused them of lacking courage.

He posted on his platform Truth Social: “All of those countries that can’t get jet fuel because of the Strait of Hormuz, like the United Kingdom, which refused to get involved in the decapitation of Iran, I have a suggestion for you: Number 1, buy from the U.S., we have plenty, and Number 2, build up some delayed courage, go to the Strait, and just TAKE IT.

“You’ll have to start learning how to fight for yourself, the U.S.A. won’t be there to help you anymore, just like you weren’t there for us. Iran has been, essentially, decimated. The hard part is done. Go get your own oil!”

Leader of the Liberal Democrats, Ed Davey, said he opposed the state visit taking place. 

He said: “The Prime Minister is showing a staggering lack of backbone by pushing ahead with this state visit while Donald Trump treats our country with contempt.

“To send the King on a state visit to the US after Trump dismissed our Royal Navy as ‘toys’ is a humiliation, and a sign of a government too weak to stand up to bullies. 

“What appalling thing does Trump have to do next to make the Government see sense and cancel the state visit?”

According to a YouGov survey last week, 49 per cent of the British public were against the state visit to the US, while 33 per cent were in support of it.

Fascist Israel minister Itamar Ben-Gvir has pushed through a law in the Knesset which will authorise the death penalty – by hanging – of Palestinians. Specifically, this law will apply by default to Palestinians who have been tried in military court and found guilty of committing a fatal attack.

62 Israeli officials voted for the fatal bill, with 47 voting against.

Of course, many have been horrified at this regressive and cruel Israeli law which will only work to further enable the genocidal entity’s colonisation of Palestine. They argue that enforcing this barbaric law will only work to provide a ‘legally-sanitised’ means of ramping up Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in the West Bank.

These sentences would be imposed following convictions in Israeli military courts, where authorities often pursue charges that would not constitute crimes under international humanitarian law. Denied proper access to legal counsel and basic procedural rights, defendants face proceedings that amount to little more than sham trials designed to legitimise killing.

Horrifyingly, there are currently 9,300 Palestinians in Israeli detention, whose fates will now hang in the balance – either left to suffer and languish in prison, or face the noose.

Israel’s parliament has passed a law today authorising the death penalty – exclusively for Palestinians.

There are over 9,300 Palestinians in Israeli detention.

The executions will be carried out by hanging.

Does @Keir_Starmer still consider Israel an ally? pic.twitter.com/XWaGGDMyL4

Advertisement

— Declassified UK (@declassifiedUK) March 30, 2026

Israel institutionalising genocide

The death penalty changes will allow the occupying state to institutionalise large-scale violence against the Palestinian population under a thin veneer of legality. Such a horrifying development raises profound moral and legal concerns, particularly regarding the protection of civilian lives and adherence to international humanitarian standards.

Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas slammed the legislation, saying:

Such laws and measures will not break the will of the Palestinian people or undermine their steadfastness. Nor will they deter them from continuing their legitimate struggle for freedom, independence, and the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital.

The Palestinian foreign ministry defiantly stated:

This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimise extrajudicial killing under legislative cover.

UN Experts also called on Israel to withdraw the bill back in February, and as per usual, Israel has taken no notice whatsoever.

Belgian MEP, Marc Botenga, has subsequently called on the EU to suspend its Association Agreement with Israel:

Israel just adopted the death penalty for Palestinians.

Last week, the @eu_eeas called the death penalty a violation of the right to life and to freedom from torture.

Logically, the EU should now suspend the EU-Israel Association Agreement that demands respect for human rights.

Advertisement

— Marc Botenga MEP (@BotengaM) March 30, 2026

Disturbing historical parallels

Furthermore, this death penalty evokes disturbing historical parallels, including the systematic atrocities carried out during the Holocaust under Nazi Germany, where millions of Jewish people and other marginalised groups were murdered in gas chambers. Like Israel, Hitler enforced special courts called the ‘People’s Court’ to enforce the genocidal agenda of the Nazi regime, condemning thousands to death for “volk treason”.

While historical contexts differ, the comparison underscores the gravity of policies that oil the wheels of genocide.

Frankly, the joyful celebrations on display from Ben-Gvir and far-right allies simply underscore how murderous and bloodthirsty Zionists are:

VIDEO | Israeli National Security Minister Ben Gvir, outside the Knesset chamber, celebrates the passing of the death penalty law for Palestinian detainees, describing it as historic and saying, “Soon we will count them one by one.” pic.twitter.com/yc4Aan0dLf

— The Cradle (@TheCradleMedia) March 30, 2026

According to the bill, those who receive the death penalty will be kept in a separate detention center with no visitors apart from authorised personnel. Legal consultations, if they even get them, will happen by video link only with executions (murders) carried out within just 90 days. 

The Guardian reported:

The measure will allow courts to impose the death penalty without a request from prosecutors and without requiring unanimity, instead permitting a simple majority decision. Military courts in the occupied West Bank will also be empowered to hand down death sentences, with the defence minister able to submit an opinion.

For Palestinians under occupation, the bill closes off avenues for appeal or clemency, while prisoners tried inside Israel could have their sentences commuted to life imprisonment.

Advertisement

No justice in an apartheid State

This ruling from the Knesset has sent a chill across the world. People have powerlessly watched a live-streamed genocide against Palestinians, while their leaders continue to kowtow to Israel. Confronted with this unfolding reality, ordinary citizens have taken it upon themselves to learn the history of Palestine and stand in solidarity with their Arab brothers and sisters.

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) declared in 2024 that this is indeed a plausible genocide with Iceland and Netherland recently joining the case against Israel. On the other hand, many western leaders have done precious little to bring an end to the mass murder of innocent people despite widespread protests at home. Nevertheless, it appears that a red line is finally forming.

An oppressor’s military court does not prioritise justice, instead it serves as another tool to further the colonial ambitions of Zionist Israel. As a result, this law will only exacerbate their murderous tendencies under a manufactured legal facade.

Western leaders must finally lift their heads out of the sand. This death penalty attempts to legalise the murder of a captive and oppressed population, with those same captors serving as judge, jury, and executioner.

This reality echoes the atrocities once sanctioned by Adolf Hitler during World War II. The world must act immediately to halt this rapidly accelerating descent into the abyss – instead of just watching from the sidelines as usual.

Featured image via The Cradle

David Henig looks at the impact of the recently signed EU-Australia deal, as well as the EU’s wider approach to Free Trade Agreements in light of geopolitical uncertainty. 

Signing a Free Trade Agreement with Australia is the latest step in the EU’s clear acceleration towards completing a programme started in the mid-1990s to secure improved terms of trade for its exporters across the globe. President Trump’s disregard for trade rules is helping, as the Commission and most member states want to show they will not be following suit. Where this also leads is an emerging question as to what will come next for EU trade policy, not least given these FTAs can be set against measures that point in a more protectionist direction.

Early details suggest this new EU-Australia deal is mostly a traditional one focusing on removing what were already low tariffs for industrial goods, protecting EU geographical indications, and offering limited access to EU agriculture markets. There are some elements that go beyond this, such as cooperation on critical raw materials, but steel is notably excluded given EU desires to restrict imports.

This is not going to be any kind of economic game-changer not least in a world in which EU industrial goods are increasingly struggling to be competitive with those from China. Nor is this new trade deal really the basis of some kind of alternative world trade order to the WTO, even one undermined by the US breaking its commitments by raising tariffs and then coercing countries into deals to reduce them. At best one can see the EU’s hurry to expand its network of trade agreements as a form of insurance against a possible future without a well-functioning WTO.

At this stage even the traditionally free trade-hostile French government appears to be happy with a deal that is far less generous in terms of market access for meat imports than both the EU-Mercosur deal and the deal which the UK negotiated with Australia in 2021. There may even be an element of satisfaction that this shows Brussels doing better in negotiations than London. This Australia deal also means that the EU has matched the post-Brexit trade deals secured by the UK with the exception of accession to the trans-pacific CPTPP bloc, filling an obvious gap in an already extensive set of bilateral FTAs.

Despite overt French opposition, the EU-Mercosur agreement will come into provisional effect from the start of May 2026. This demonstrated some skilful political handling from a Commission responsible for negotiations with a Parliament that has yet to give its approval given that it has become the custom if not the legal reality that this is required. In particular the Chair of the International Trade Committee, German Social Democrat Bernd Lange, professed himself satisfied. His voice is increasingly important as the EU struggles with a turbulent global picture.

Earlier this year the EU completed negotiations with India, which as with an earlier agreement with Indonesia, should come into force before the end of this Commission term in 2029. Experienced Brussels trade hands are also increasingly confident that there will be more deals in the next three years. Talks with Thailand, Malaysia, and the Philippines are advancing, as are more recently launched ones with the UAE. All of this will point towards a highly productive five years for EU trade policy.

Less is expected of discussions between the EU and the twelve members of the CPTPP that include the UK. While these are among the stronger supporters of global trade rules, what is mostly being discussed is some fairly limited cooperation starting by restating approaches on digital rules. Commission sources have previously said that cooperation between two blocs is outside of their comfort zone, and going further such as by providing tariff-free access for goods produced using CPTPP supply chains would run into fears around the impact on EU industry.

This problem in dealing with CPTPP cooperation demonstrates one of the EU’s major trade policy challenges for the future, of how to move beyond traditional FTA issues into working with other countries on some of today’s challenges such as the growing economic security agenda. Existing Free Trade Agreements are in danger of being devalued as measures like the carbon border adjustment mechanism, investment restrictions, abolition of de minimis customs exemptions for low-value imports, and ‘Made in Europe’ content requirements are excluded. However, to incorporate these would be challenging, as debate over the latter (about which countries should count as ‘Made in Europe’) is showing.

Even more difficult an issue is the EU approach to trade with the US and China, the only countries among its top trade partners with which it has no traditional trade agreement. Member state leaders continue to float the possibility of resurrecting a proper US-EU trade agreement, presumably under the next President, ten years after the failure of Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership talks. Longstanding differences on food and digital regulations, and public procurement, still look very difficult to overcome however. The Turnberry Agreement, now approved by the European Parliament, is best seen as a temporary response to Trump’s coercion (by reducing tariffs on EU imports) that may not even last his term.

An EU-China trade agreement seems even more improbable due to concerns about EU industry and the political effect that would have on US-EU ties. This, however, also reveals why there is no prospect of resurrecting a stronger WTO, as the three would need to agree on something for it to happen.

Such then has been the approach of this Commission under pressure from President Trump, to accelerate the tried and tested and park the more difficult issues for another time. As a strategy for survival there is considerable logic. It is however not really a basis for tackling the fragmentation of rules currently afflicting the world trade system, still less for addressing the challenges of modern global markets. Thus, as one programme to sign new FTAs comes to an end there is a serious need to think about what will come next, but work that has barely started.

By David Henig, Director of the UK Trade Policy Project at ECIPE.

Book for six or more shows and get a 15% discount via the Pleasance box office only (not available via Edfringe.com)

For further details & images, please contact Kate Farrell

Demonstrators march through London in June 2022 in protest against violence towards women, and to honour Nicole Smallman and Bibaa Henry, who were murdered in 2020 (Credit Image: © Vuk Valcic/ZUMA Press Wire)

3 min read60 min

When three quarters of Black women who experience domestic abuse want to report it but feel unable to, we should ask a difficult question: what kind of system have we built, if silence feels safer than seeking help?

Valerie did everything we ask of victims. She recognised the danger and sought help. She was failed by the services meant to protect her. Nothing about Valerie and RJ’s deaths was inevitable. If her warnings had been taken seriously, both would still be alive today.

Research by Sistah Space, based on the experiences of more than 2,200 women across England and Wales, shows how serious this problem is. Nearly all of the women surveyed said they did not have confidence that reporting abuse would lead to fair or supportive treatment. Many said they felt misunderstood or dismissed when they did reach out. That matters because what happens when a woman asks for help can determine whether she is protected or put at greater risk.

Violence against women and girls is a national emergency. The government has set out an ambitious approach, with a focus on prevention, accountability and rebuilding trust. That direction is right. But it must be felt in practice across all demographics.

For too many Black women, coming forward is not just difficult, it is risky. There is fear of not being believed, of being stereotyped as aggressive, or of losing their children. Some fear that speaking out will make things worse. When those fears are present, it is not surprising that many women stay silent.

Sistah Space’s report gives clear examples of where things go wrong. Women describe coercive control not being recognised, or harm being minimised because injuries are not obvious. Some speak about bruising on darker skin not being properly recorded. These are basic issues, but they can make the difference between someone being protected or not.

Many professionals work extremely hard to support survivors. But without the right training, risk can be missed.

Culturally competent care is part of getting this right. It means understanding how different experiences shape the way abuse is reported, recognised and responded to. It means building trust, not losing it.

The government has committed to a survivor-centred approach to tackling violence against women and girls. The task now is delivery. For too many Black women, the system still does not feel like it works for them. Valerie’s Law is a practical way to change that. It would make specialist training mandatory for police, social workers and healthcare professionals, so that responses are informed by the lived experience of Black women.

This builds on work already underway, and strengthens it. It would also create a consistent standard, so that support does not depend on where someone lives or who they speak to.

Black women are not asking for special treatment – they are asking for equal treatment. They are asking to be believed and to be treated properly when they ask for help.

If we are serious about ending violence against women and girls, the system has to work for those who currently trust it least. On the 12th anniversary of Valerie and Jahzara’s murders, the case for change is clear. We know what needs to happen. The question is whether we are prepared to act on it.

Abena Oppong-Asare is Labour MP for Erith and Thamesmead

Key Takeaways:

• Small works projects can revitalise commercial spaces efficiently and cost-effectively.
• They offer flexibility for office managers, landlords, and property developers in London.
• Professional planning, compliance, and quality assurance are critical for successful outcomes.
• Choosing experienced contractors ensures compliance, minimal disruption, and long-term value.
• Discover more about small works tailored to commercial needs.

What Are Small Works in Commercial Refurbishment?

Direct Definition and Scope

Small works is any project under £200,000. Small works refer to focused commercial construction, refurbishment, and alteration projects with budgets typically up to £200,000. These works may include office reconfigurations, minor fit-outs, partitioning, lighting upgrades, or compliance-driven modifications. Unlike large-scale refurbishments, small works are designed for rapid turnaround, minimal disruption, and precise delivery in operational office environments.     

Key Features of Small Works

• Rapid project timelines, commonly between two days and six weeks
• Strict adherence to health and safety, CDM 2015, and London building regulations
• Minimal impact on day-to-day business operations
• Customisable to suit tenant, landlord, or property manager requirements

Why Small Works Matter for London Businesses

According to the British Council for Offices, 73% of London-based companies undertook minor office upgrades between 2023 and 2024 to improve employee wellbeing and space utilisation. These projects often provide a measurable return on investment, with workspace enhancements shown to boost satisfaction and productivity.     

How Can Small Works Transform Your Workspace?

Practical Benefits for Commercial Environments

Small works offer a strategic solution for businesses that require modernisation, compliance upgrades, or reorganisation without the cost and disruption of a full-scale fit-out. The flexibility of these projects allows companies to adapt quickly to changing needs, whether accommodating hybrid work models or addressing new health and safety standards.     

Examples of Impactful Small Works Projects

• Partitioning to create private meeting rooms or collaboration zones
• Lighting and power upgrades to meet sustainability standards
• Restroom improvements for accessibility compliance
• Internal redecoration to reinforce brand identity
• Minor mechanical and electrical upgrades, including improved HVAC

Case Study: Office Reconfiguration Success

In 2024, a London financial services firm commissioned a series of small works to create agile zones within their existing office floorplate. By introducing glass partitions and updating communal areas, the project was delivered in under three weeks with zero business interruption. Post-completion surveys found a 24% improvement in team satisfaction and a 15% rise in collaboration, according to internal HR metrics.     

Ensuring Quality and Compliance in Small Works Projects

Professional Planning and Execution

Quality and regulatory compliance remain essential regardless of project size. Appointing experienced professionals ensures that small works are delivered to the highest standards, covering risk assessments, method statements, and necessary accreditations. London businesses often require contractors accredited by ISO 9001, ISO 14001, CHAS, and Constructionline to guarantee both safety and quality.     

Expert Insights: Minimising Disruption and Delay

“For commercial refurbishments in occupied buildings, it is crucial to maintain clear communication and phased delivery,” says Paul Jeapes, Commercial Director (2025). “This approach reduces operational impact and ensures compliance with workplace safety regulations.”     

Managing Budgets and Timelines

Small works projects are typically budgeted with clear, itemised proposals, allowing facilities and office managers to monitor costs closely. According to a 2024 industry survey, 82% of London property managers cited budget certainty as their top priority for selecting refurbishment partners.     

Checklist: Selecting a Qualified Small Works Contractor

• Verify industry accreditations and relevant insurance cover
• Request detailed programmes and phased delivery plans
• Review recent case studies and references from similar sectors
• Ensure commitment to health, safety, and environmental standards
• Assess aftercare and warranty provisions for completed works

Who Benefits Most from Small Works?

Small works are ideal for commercial landlords seeking to minimise vacancy, office managers tasked with compliance or layout changes, and developers looking to add value between tenancies. For example, a landlord in the City of London refreshed common areas in three multi-let buildings, achieving a 17% increase in tenant retention over 12 months, as reported in their 2024 annual review.     

London Market Trends in Small Works

The demand for flexible and sustainable workspaces continues to grow. Recent trends show an increased focus on biophilic design, energy-efficient lighting, and touchless technologies—elements easily addressed through targeted small works. A 2025 report by the UK Green Building Council found that 64% of commercial tenants now prioritise sustainability upgrades when renewing leases.     

Frequently Asked Questions about Small Works

What types of commercial properties are suitable for small works?

Offices, retail units, educational facilities, and healthcare spaces across London benefit from small works programmes. The key factor is the need for focused improvement without a complete overhaul.     

How can disruption be minimised during works?

Phased working, out-of-hours scheduling, and detailed communication all help reduce business disruption. Experienced contractors will provide tailored plans to suit each client’s operational needs.     

Do small works improve asset value?

Yes. Strategic upgrades such as improved lighting, fresh finishes, and updated amenities can increase both asset value and tenant appeal, according to Savills’ 2024 London Office Market Report.     

Taking the Next Step: Making Small Works Work for You

For business owners, facilities managers, and landlords in London, well-planned small works represent an opportunity to adapt, modernise, and futureproof their commercial spaces. The right programme can support business growth, regulatory compliance, and long-term efficiency. By prioritising quality, communication, and expert guidance, organisations can deliver successful outcomes that benefit staff and tenants alike.     

To ensure your next project delivers measurable value, explore guidance on small works and review recent success stories from similar commercial environments. Consider consulting with a specialist to discuss your unique requirements and identify the best approach for your property or business.