Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Zoom (ZM) Stock Plunges 5.7% Amid AI Agent Disruption Concerns

Published

on

ZM Stock Card

Key Takeaways

  • Zoom (ZM) finished Thursday’s session down 5.7% at $79.24, significantly worse than the S&P 500’s modest 0.11% decline
  • Enterprise software sector weakness stemmed from concerns that AI agents from Anthropic and OpenAI could threaten traditional business models
  • Year-to-date, ZM has declined 6.8% and currently trades 19.3% beneath its 52-week peak of $96.22
  • Analysts anticipate EPS of $1.41 for the coming quarter, representing a 1.4% year-over-year decline, while revenue is expected to reach $1.22 billion
  • The stock trades at a forward P/E of 14.32, notably below the industry benchmark of 17.88

Zoom (ZM) experienced significant selling pressure on Thursday, shedding 5.7% to settle at $79.24. This steep decline stood in stark contrast to broader market performance — the Nasdaq climbed 0.35% while the S&P 500 edged down a mere 0.11%.


ZM Stock Card
Zoom Communications, Inc., ZM

The weakness wasn’t isolated to Zoom alone. Enterprise software stocks across the board faced substantial headwinds as market participants grew increasingly anxious about emerging managed AI agents developed by companies like Anthropic and OpenAI. The fundamental concern centers on a simple question: if AI agents can autonomously perform functions currently handled by enterprise software platforms, what happens to the sector’s pricing power and long-term viability?

Zoom found itself swept up in this broader industry downdraft. Beyond sector-wide pressures, the video communications platform continues wrestling with its own unique challenges — persistent competitive threats and lingering uncertainty about sustainable growth trajectories as pandemic tailwinds fade into memory.

Despite Thursday’s setback, a longer view reveals more encouraging momentum. Over the preceding 30 days, ZM climbed 12.13%, substantially outpacing both the Computer and Technology sector’s 0.88% advance and the S&P 500’s 0.51% uptick. While Thursday’s decline put a dent in that rally, it didn’t completely reverse the recent gains.

It’s worth noting that volatility of this magnitude remains relatively uncommon for Zoom. Throughout the past year, the stock has registered just five daily moves exceeding 5%. When such pronounced swings occur, they typically signal meaningful shifts in market sentiment.

Advertisement

Earnings Performance and Analyst Expectations

The most recent comparable move came five months earlier — but in the opposite direction. ZM surged 13.5% following third-quarter results that exceeded Wall Street expectations on both revenue and earnings. The company posted $1.23 billion in revenue against a consensus estimate of $1.21 billion, marking 4.4% year-over-year growth. Adjusted earnings per share reached $1.52, topping analyst projections of $1.44. Management also boosted full-year adjusted EPS guidance to a midpoint of $5.96.

Those solid results provided meaningful support for the stock. Thursday’s reversal suggests investors are once again questioning the durability of that positive momentum.

Looking forward, Wall Street consensus calls for earnings per share of $1.41 in the upcoming quarter — representing a 1.4% contraction versus the prior-year period. Revenue projections stand at $1.22 billion, implying 4.16% year-over-year expansion. For the full fiscal year, analysts are modeling $5.87 in EPS and $5.06 billion in total revenue.

From a valuation perspective, ZM appears attractively priced. The forward price-to-earnings ratio stands at 14.32, meaningfully below the sector average of 17.88. However, the price-to-earnings-growth (PEG) ratio paints a less compelling picture at 3.23 versus an industry norm of 1.0 — indicating skepticism about whether anticipated earnings expansion warrants the current valuation.

Advertisement

Technical Position and Analyst Ratings

From a year-to-date perspective, ZM has surrendered 6.8%. Trading at $79.24, the stock remains 19.3% below its 52-week high of $96.22, established in January 2026.

Zoom currently carries a Zacks Rank of #3 (Hold), with consensus earnings estimates holding steady over the past month.

The Internet – Software industry occupies the 95th position among the 250-plus industries monitored by Zacks, landing it in the top 39% of all tracked sectors.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Foundry’s institutional Zcash pool captures a third of new issuance

Published

on

Cyclops raises $8m for enterprise stablecoin infrastructure

Foundry’s U.S.‑based, compliance‑first Zcash pool has already grown to roughly one‑third of network hashrate, giving institutional miners a regulated way into privacy coins while stoking fresh centralisation fears.

Summary

  • Bitcoin mining giant Foundry has launched an institutional Zcash pool that already accounts for roughly one‑third of new ZEC issuance.
  • The U.S.‑based, compliance‑focused pool is pitched at institutional and public miners as a “purpose‑built” alternative to offshore privacy‑coin infrastructure.
  • Foundry argues Zcash’s zero‑knowledge privacy with selective disclosure makes it more compatible with regulation than rivals like Monero.

Foundry Digital, operator of the Foundry USA Bitcoin mining pool, has officially launched an institutional‑grade Zcash (ZEC) mining pool that has quickly grown to around 30% of the network’s hashrate, consolidating a significant share of new ZEC issuance under a single U.S.‑regulated operator. The Rochester, New York‑based firm, which Fortune notes already commands about 31% of global Bitcoin production, is positioning its new pool as the default home for institutional miners seeking exposure to privacy‑focused assets without abandoning compliance.finance.

In a Business Wire release, Foundry said the Zcash pool has seen “rapid and sustained hashrate growth reaching ~30% of the current Zcash network hashrate” since it was first announced on March 11, with “multiple institutional mining customers already onboarded and contributing hashrate.” The company stressed that the pool is “designed for professional mining organizations and public companies that require a U.S.-based, compliance-ready partner, including KYC verification in line with Foundry’s institutional standards,” mirroring the governance of its Bitcoin operation.

Advertisement

Foundry CEO Mike Colyer framed the move as both a bet on Zcash and a response to unmet institutional demand. “Zcash has matured into an institutional‑grade asset, but the mining infrastructure supporting it hasn’t kept pace,” he said, adding that the new pool is “purpose‑built for the operational and compliance requirements of institutional and public miners.”

A CoinMarketCap summary of the launch notes that the pool will offer know‑your‑customer and anti‑money‑laundering checks, transparent payout calculations, reporting tools and 24/7 technical support, with no minimum hashrate required to join.

Zcash, launched in 2016, relies on zero‑knowledge proofs (zk‑SNARKs) to enable shielded transactions that hide sender, receiver and amount while still allowing selective disclosure to auditors or regulators. Foundry and several commentators have argued that this “privacy with a view key” model is more compatible with institutional compliance than fully opaque systems like Monero, which lack native mechanisms for selective transparency.

Advertisement

At the same time, the arrival of a U.S. pool with roughly one‑third of Zcash’s hashrate raises familiar centralisation questions. Unfolded and other mining trackers have previously highlighted that Foundry USA already coordinates about 30% of Bitcoin’s global hashrate, and Mempool.space data shows the pool averaging more than 340 exahashes per second on Bitcoin alone. Adding a Zcash operation that quickly captures around one‑third of ZEC issuance further concentrates influence over block production in a single corporate group, albeit one that stresses its role in “contribut[ing] to the decentralization of Bitcoin’s hashrate” by anchoring North American capacity.

For Zcash, the trade‑off is stark: institutional capital and hashpower are flowing in through a U.S.‑regulated gateway that validates the project’s positioning as a compliant privacy coin, but at the cost of a more concentrated mining landscape. As regulators in the U.S., EU and Hong Kong tighten their grip on stablecoins, exchanges and tokenized assets — a trend explored in recent crypto.news coverage of HKDAP’s launch, MiCA implementation and the CLARITY Act — Zcash’s bet is that privacy with selective disclosure, plus a mining pool built for auditors rather than cypherpunks, is a price worth paying for long‑term relevance.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin’s 50% Drawdown ‘Priced In’ Quantum Computing Threat: Bernstein

Published

on

Bitcoin's 50% Drawdown ‘Priced In’ Quantum Computing Threat: Bernstein

Bernstein said Monday that Bitcoin’s selloff has already priced in much of the market’s fear around quantum computing, arguing that the threat is real but still manageable rather than an immediate existential risk.

Bitcoin’s (BTC) near 50% drawdown from its $126,198 all-time high in October 2025 is proof that the market has “priced in” several risks tied to a quantum breakthrough, partly thanks to technological progress on zero-knowledge privacy and quantum-proof cryptography that “counterbalance” the AI and quantum acceleration, Bernstein said in a Monday note shared with Cointelegraph.

The note lands two weeks after Google researchers said future quantum computers could break the elliptic-curve cryptography used across many blockchains with fewer than 500,000 physical qubits in some architectures, reviving debate over how quickly Bitcoin needs a post-quantum upgrade path. This research suggested a quantum computer could crack a Bitcoin private key in nine minutes, in a theoretical scenario, which is less than Bitcoin’s 10-minute block production time.

However, Bernstein said Bitcoin core developers have “adequate time” to determine a post-quantum path. Last week, Bernstein predicted that Bitcoin has about three to five years to prepare for a post-quantum security upgrade, Cointelegraph reported on Wednesday.

Advertisement
Graph showing the risk that an on-spend quantum attack that takes 9 minutes to derive a private key succeeds against Bitcoin. Source: Google Quantum AI

Institutions will play constructive role in quantum-proofing Bitcoin

Bernstein said large institutional holders, including exchange-traded fund (ETF) issuers and corporate treasury buyers such as Strategy, are likely to play a constructive role in any eventual consensus on a post-quantum upgrade.

“We expect institutional partners with now billions at stake to play a constructive role in building consensus on the post-quantum path.”

The note also highlighted the recently introduced BIP-360 proposal and added that slower consensus from Bitcoin developers is seen as responsible behavior when it comes to a $1.5 trillion asset.

BIP-360 is a draft Bitcoin Improvement Proposal that proposes a Pay-to-Merkle-Root output type designed to reduce long-exposure quantum risk by removing Taproot’s key-path vulnerability, though it does not itself add post-quantum digital signatures.

Bernstein said BIP-360 could be implemented as a soft fork for exposed Bitcoin addresses, but added that this would still leave around 8% of the BTC supply in inactive addresses vulnerable to future quantum breakthroughs.

Related: Bitcoiners push for quantum-resistant BIP-360 upgrade as debate heats up

Advertisement

Quantum-proofing Bitcoin is a social issue, not technical

The real challenge of quantum-proofing Bitcoin lies in the societal adoption element of the new standards, not the technical development, according to Arthur Breitman, co-founder of Tezos blockchain.

“The coding work could be done this afternoon,” but Bitcoin holders would still need to migrate to this new standard, Breitman told Cointelegraph during an interview at EthCC 2026.

“If Bitcoin needed to migrate in the next month, they could do it from a technical perspective […] but they can’t get everyone to migrate their key in a month, Breitman said. “It’s going to take years for people to properly migrate their keys,” he added.

Arthur Breitman, co-founder of Tezos, interview at EthCC 2026. Source: Cointelegraph

Asset manager Grayscale’s head of research, Zach Pandl, shared a similar view in a research report last Monday. He said Bitcoin’s quantum-proofing challenges are “more social than technical,” provided that its UTXO model does not have native smart contracts and that some address types are not quantum vulnerable.

However, he warned that the community needs to find consensus on how to quantum-proof wallets where the private key has been lost or is otherwise inaccessible.

Advertisement

Magazine: AI has dramatically accelerated the quantum threat to Bitcoin: AI Eye