For the first time, AIM is expanding beyond its Sligo-based headquarters, to target additional ‘industry clusters’ in the west of Ireland.
The Advancing Innovation in Manufacturing (AIM) Centre in Sligo, which is a collaborative partnership between the Atlantic Technological University, Sligo County Council and Leitrim County Council, has announced an expansion with a new Galway base of operations.
The AIM Centre intends to strengthen its links within the medtech and life sciences sectors and for the first time will expand outside of Sligo. The centre is also currently recruiting for specialist roles in both the Galway and Sligo facilities.
AIM focuses on business transformation, supporting companies across manufacturing operations, supply chain, HR, legal, energy, data and decision-making. The centre also supports the services sector, “recognising the increasing demand for practical AI adoption and data-driven transformation beyond manufacturing”.
Advertisement
The expansion was supported by the Western Development Commission, with the new base to be located out of Wellpark Road in Galway city. AIM has stated that the decision to join the hubs is part of the organisation’s “growth strategy, a key plank of which is developing links with key industry clusters”.
As part of the expansion, AIM is planning a range of events intended to boost engagement in Galway in the coming months. For example, towards the end of April, the organisation will have a stand at the Dexcom Stadium for the MedTech Innovation expo, bringing together exhibitors and expert speakers to showcase new technologies and research in the healthcare space.
AIM Centre will also be in attendance at the AtlanTec Festival conference in May. Tech companies from the AtlanTec Gateway and globally, will be present throughout the festival, demonstrating how technology is transforming businesses and society.
Commenting on the announcement, David Bermingham, the director of AI at AIM Centre, said: “The move to open our first Galway hub is designed to strengthen our national reach. We already work with companies across Ireland, but having a base in Galway allows us to be closer to key sectors like medtech and life sciences, where there is strong demand for what we do.
Advertisement
“The AIM Centre’s strength is that we look at the entire business. We work with companies to understand where AI and digital technologies can deliver real impact, from operations and energy through to strategy and decision-making. It’s not about technology for the sake of it. It’s about solving real business problems. We are also seeing growing demand from the services sector, and this expansion allows us to support a broader range of organisations in adopting AI in a practical and meaningful way.”
Méabh Conaghan, the regional director at Enterprise Ireland, added: “Enterprise Ireland is committed to supporting Irish companies to adopt digital and AI technologies that enhance productivity, competitiveness and sustainability.
“The expansion of the AIM Centre to collaborate with CREW in Galway, another regional enterprise development centre, strengthens the regional and national AI support ecosystem. This development will bring expertise closer to key industrial clusters while continuing to support manufacturers and services companies nationwide in applying AI in a practical way.”
Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.
Over the years, smartphone brands have steadily refined their craft. From design to performance, devices in 2026 feel sharper, smarter, and far more polished than before. But a recent look at the Sony Xperia 1 VIII suggests Sony might be holding on a little too tightly to the past, and not entirely in a good way. Here’s why I feel that way.
This doesn’t look like the Sony we remember
I remember when Sony really stood out. There was a certain confidence to its design language, something that felt distinct. Looking at the Xperia 1 VIII now, though, it feels like that clarity has faded a bit. The back panel, at least in this render, is where things really fall apart for me. The design looks absolutely confusing. Sony’s signature vertically aligned camera setup has always been part of its identity, and moving away from that strips away a sense of familiarity that long-time users associated with the brand. Without that, the design feels oddly generic, almost like it could belong to any other phone.
As for the camera island, it comes across as bulky and somewhat dated, reminding me of the OnePlus 10 Pro from 2022, a design language even OnePlus has since moved on from. That’s what makes this feel particularly off. It feels like revisiting an idea the rest of the industry has already left behind.
Weibo
What stands out even more is how out of sync this feels with where smartphone design is headed today. Most brands are leaning into cleaner, more minimal aesthetics that feel refined and modern. Loud, heavy camera islands are usually reserved for niche or limited-edition designs now, not mainstream flagships.
All of this makes it seem like Sony isn’t quite setting its own direction, but is instead borrowing from trends that have already run their course. And for a brand that once led with such a strong design identity, that shift feels a little disappointing.
Advertisement
A shift without a sense of direction
To be honest, I’ve always held Sony to a slightly higher standard. It was one of those brands you expected to take a clear, confident stance on design and experience. That’s why this feels a bit disappointing now. It’s not just about one device, but the sense that the brand has lost some of its direction along the way.
Weibo
At a glance, the Xperia 1 VIII certainly tries to set itself apart, but that distinction feels a bit hollow. It comes across more like a shift without a clear purpose. That’s where it starts to lose ground. In the current flagship landscape, looking different isn’t enough on its own. A design needs to carry intent, show progression, and align with the direction the industry is moving in. This one doesn’t quite deliver on that front. Standing out is simple; moving the needle is what really counts.
Ben McKenzie had a question: “When did WIRED die?” Specifically, the actor-director wanted to know when did WIRED “‘DIE,’ all caps.”
McKenzie wasn’t asking for himself; he was engaging in the time-honored celebrity tradition of reading mean tweets. Although, in this case, the object wasn’t himself so much as the publication hosting the event. McKenzie, who famously played Ryan on The O.C. before becoming a leading voice of crypto skepticism, was sharing the stage with WIRED senior correspondent Andy Greenberg for the first of what will hopefully be a series of smaller events that we are calling WIRED@Night.
McKenzie, coauthor of Easy Money: Cryptocurrency, Casino Capitalism, and the Golden Age of Fraud, has a new independent documentary in theaters called Everyone Is Lying to You for Money. Greenberg, who often writes about crypto scams, talked to him about scenes from the book and movie, in which McKenzie traveled to places like crypto hub El Salvador to understand why the technology still has so much appeal despite its less-than-stellar reputation.
Advertisement
One of McKenzie’s explanations? Male loneliness. “It’s the longing for community, actual community,” McKenzie said, noting that crypto exists online as a kind of extreme gambling, something that really exploded into the mainstream during the Covid-19 pandemic. Here’s to more IRL antidotes to that kind of digital isolation.
We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.
Philips Baristina Milk Frother: Two-minute review
The Philips Baristina milk frother is designed to be partnered with the company’s Baristina bean-to-cup espresso machine, and it works an absolute treat. As it’s available as an optional extra for the Baristina machine, I’ve been using it for a couple of weeks alongside my Philips LatteGo 4400 Series espresso machine, and have found it to deliver much more pleasing results compared to my machine where milk foam is concerned.
It has three modes: hot milk foam, hot milk and cold milk foam. It’s incredibly easy to control, with just a single button that you press for no more than one second for hot milk foam, or you can hold it for three seconds to activate the cold milk foam mode. If you want hot milk, you need to remove the coil from the whisk before starting up the machine. Once the button is pressed, the Philips Baristina Milk Frother will spring into action to deliver you a foamy result. There’s no audible beep to let you know it’s finished, but the light on the button will go out.
Advertisement
In use, I found the Philips Baristina Milk Frother to be extremely quiet, measuring around 40dB using the decibelX app on my iPhone, and standing right next to it while it was working. It’s much quieter than using a steam wand on a coffee machine, or the automatic LatteGo system on my Philips machine.
The good thing about the Philips Baristina Milk Frother is that it’s been designed to work with any type of milk, including non-dairy varieties. This can’t be said of all milk frothers, including the Smeg Mini Milk Frother, which is intended to be used only with chilled full-fat dairy milk, and is a feature I find particularly appealing, being an oat milk drinker.
In tests, hot milk foam was very thick, making it well-suited for topping a cappuccino or even an espresso macchiato. Realistically though — and if you’re particularly specific about milk in your coffee — it’s just too thick to make a caffe latte or flat white. For me, personally, whose regular order is an oat milk flat white, I didn’t mind the thickness of the foam, especially as some other milk-foaming systems I’ve used aren’t as effective.
Advertisement
The exact results you achieve will depend on the specific milk you put in. I tried a couple of different oat milk brands and achieved similar results each time — this being a high level of foam, but without much gloss.
With that being said, if you want to be able to adjust the foam texture when frothing milk using a device such as this, the Dreo Baristamaker or Smeg Multi Milk Frother give you the option. It’s a similar story with cold milk foam too, with the Philips Baristina Milk Frother returning a thick, stable foam that is ideal for iced cappuccinos.
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
The carafe itself has a non-stick coating that helps your milk pour out easily, and it makes washing up as easy as possible. All it took during my use was a rinse under the tap to remove any leftovers. The whisk is removable to help ensure nothing is caught in it, and this, along with the lid, are both dishwasher safe.
Advertisement
While I was consistently pleased with results, given the fact you can’t specify the level of foam you’d prefer, and you can find more affordable options that do have such function, I have to dock some points from the Philips Baristina Milk Frother.
The Philips Baristina Milk Frother has a list price of $99.99 in the US and AU$149 in Australia. In the UK, it’s currently only available when bundled with the matching Baristina bean-to-cup coffee machine.
Its list price places the Philips milk frother in mid-range territory. The Nespresso Aeroccino 3, which has previously been the milk frother I’ve used at home and which offers the same limited range of features, retails for $99 / £79 / AU$109, making it cheaper only in Australia.
Advertisement
If you want a milk frother that offers more features, Smeg Multi Milk Frother, which has six functions and is also suitable for making drinks like hot chocolate, costs $249.95 / £179.95 / AU$299 and is available globally.
The Philips Baristina Milk Frother has been designed to perfectly match its recently released Baristina bean-to-cup espresso machine. My colleague, Cat, has already reviewed that machine, where she awarded it a full five stars, claiming it to be the best budget espresso machine currently available.
One of the only negatives she could find was that there was no built-in steam wand for frothing milk, making this standalone milk frother a necessity for milk-based coffee drinkers. It comes in the same two color choices of white or black, and adopts the same ribbed aesthetic as the main body of the matching machine.
It comprises a cylindrical carafe, a translucent plastic lid, a removable whisk that’s held in place magnetically and a base that powers the frother. The carafe has a non-stick lining, with raised markings indicating the maximum fill level. There’s no minimum fill level marking, and Philips doesn’t list one on its website — it just mentions a capacity of 4 fl oz / 120ml — but I rarely filled up to the maximum fill line, and was still able to return a large amount of milk foam.
To activate the milk frother, you just need to press the button once to activate hot milk foam, or hold it for roughly three seconds for cold milk foam. You’ll know you’ve activated cold milk foam mode correctly because the ring light around the power button will turn blue. If you just want hot milk with no foam, you can unclip the coil from the whisk handle.
There’s no dedicated pouring spout on the Baristina Milk Frother, you’re free to pour out wherever you want. However, do note that the lack of spout, combined with the sheer thickness of milk foam produced does mean you can forget about creating latte art.
Advertisement
Image 1 of 5
(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)
(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)
(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)
(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)
(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)
I found the Philips Baristina to be relatively quick to finish foaming milk, taking around 90 seconds with oat milk filled to the maximum fill line. The Nespresso Aeroccino 3 that I’ve previously used takes closer to two minutes to heat at full capacity, and the level of foam isn’t always as consistent.
While I primarily used oat milk during my testing, I did also use full-fat dairy milk and, as expected, the results were similarly impressive. Full-fat dairy milk is higher in protein, which is essential when frothing milk to achieve the desired results. Non-dairy milks don’t always have similar levels, so for the Baristina Milk Frother to deliver the level of foam it did with oat milk, is mightily impressive.
I was also impressed by the machine’s ability to consistently heat milk up to around 140ºF / 60ºC, which is ideal for most milk varieties.
Cleaning up is an absolute walk in the park, as the non-stick lining means you only need to rinse the milk frother under the tap to remove any leftovers.
Advertisement
(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)
Philips Baristina Milk Frother review: Should you buy it?
Buy it if…
Don’t buy it if…
Advertisement
Philips Baristina Milk Frother review: Also consider
Philips Baristina Milk Frother review: How I tested
(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)
I tested each of the Philips Baristina Milk Frother’s modes using chilled oat milk and fresh full-fat milk, in accordance with Philips’ instructions.
As part of my testing, I used an oat milk that I’ve previously had trouble generating froth with when using a Nespresso milk frother. The Philips machine fared much better.
I cleaned the non-stick carafe under a tap and used a cloth to wipe away any stains, as per the instructions in the user manual.
Apple announced a huge leadership shake-up earlier today. Tim Cook will step down as CEO of the company he has headed for nearly 15 years on September 1st. That post will be filled by John Ternus, who has been with Apple for 25 years, essentially crafting out the modern product line itself. Cook is leaving down but will remain executive chairman, where he will oversee global policy and board activities.
Cook first joined the Apple team in 1998 and became CEO in 2011. During his tenure, the company’s market worth increased from approximately $350 billion to $4 trillion. Each year, the company’s income nearly quadrupled, 2.5 billion gadgets were distributed worldwide, and it even began offering services on a scale that exceeded several Fortune 500 corporations. New product lines, including as watches and earbuds, emerged, as did totally new modes of computing. Supply chains have stretched all over the world, and stores have arisen on every continent imaginable, but it’s the ordinary objects you carry in your pocket that truly tells the story.
HELLO, MACBOOK NEO — Ready for whatever your day brings, MacBook Neo flies through everyday tasks and apps. Choose from four stunning colors in a…
THE MOST COLORFUL MACBOOK LINEUP EVER — Choose from Silver, Blush, Citrus, or Indigo — each with a color-coordinated keyboard to complete the…
POWER FOR EVERYDAY TASKS — Ready the moment you open it, MacBook Neo with the A18 Pro chip delivers the performance and AI capabilities you need to…
John Ternus, on the other hand, began working at Apple in 2001, a year after finishing his mechanical engineering degree. He joined the product design team and worked his way up the hardware engineering hierarchy. By 2013, he was a vice president in charge of all hardware engineering, and he was promoted to senior vice president eight years later. Almost every major device line released by Apple has gone through his teams, including every generation of iPad, multiple iPhone models, AirPods, Apple Watch, and the transition to the Mac’s custom chips, and in recent years his focus has been on using tougher materials, making them easier to repair and less harmful to the environment. He just delivered a large presentation last September to launch the new iPhone line-up, and those who know him claim he can tell right away whether a prototype is good enough.
During the announcement, Tim Cook praised his replacement, describing Ternus as a visionary with impeccable precision and a leader with a strong sense of purpose. Ternus hailed Cook as a mentor and discussed his time working for Steve Jobs. Both guys emphasized that there will be no significant shift in direction at Apple. The values that have guided the organization for 50 years remain in place. However, the fact that Ternus, a hardware expert, is going into the senior position suggests that there may be a modest shift in direction. You see, Cook’s path to success differs significantly from Ternus’. Cook came from an operational background, but Ternus has spent his whole career working directly with the products.
Advertisement
Anyone who has been following the company closely knows that the timing was not unexpected. Rumors about Cook’s plans had been circulating for months, and he had hinted in interviews that he would wait until the proper moment to act. September now gives those two leaders four months to work together harmoniously, and it appears Ternus will also join the board of directors. Arthur Levinson, who has led the board for nearly 15 years, is stepping down to become the lead independent director. Meanwhile, Johny Srouji, a long-time chip designer, has been promoted to chief hardware officer. [Source]
Power lines, storm clouds, and shoes over Seattle. (Kurt Schlosser Photo)
After a vague report that some companies were seeking to build “large” data centers in Seattle, Mayor Katie Wilson is exploring a moratorium on new data centers.
This seems like the typical performative, hypocritical stunt we expect from our politicians. A distraction from harder issues, like ensuring we don’t retrace Cleveland’s history as the economic landscape fractures.
It is easy to ban data centers when you don’t have any (hello Maine!). Seattle’s high real estate and electricity prices mean “large” data centers in the city simply aren’t competitive. We have long had colocation facilities serving local businesses, but they’re quite small by modern standards.
Banning large data centers in Seattle is like banning cattle grazing in midtown Manhattan. Seattle just isn’t going to attract the cutting-edge AI and hyperscaler data centers that require lots of land and power. The Texas panhandle is a better place to put those.
Using data centers to complain about data centers (by posting on Facebook) carries more than a whiff of hypocrisy. Wouldn’t a sincere commitment to “environmental justice” and “economic resilience” mean not using any dastardly data centers? The mayor could abandon all online political messaging. Or order city departments to stop using any data center services.
Advertisement
(Oddly, the City of Seattle’s data center is in Spokane. Which says something about the competitiveness of data centers in Seattle and/or the city’s inclination to support local businesses.)
The Means of Production
A self-proclaimed socialist, Comrade Katie has realized the socialist ideal of owning the means of production, at least of our city-owned utilities. But with ownership comes accountability and responsibility.
By drawing a line against new data centers, she would remove the easiest scapegoat for her performance. No blaming Big Tech. No pointing to AI. What remains is a testable proposition: will Seattle have affordable, reliable power?
Some challenges loom.
Advertisement
Affordable and Reliable Power
Seattle City Light already charges some of the highest electricity prices in Washington, a state that generally enjoys low power costs thanks to abundant hydropower.
Mayor Wilson’s first move was to fire the head of City Light and nominate a replacement with no utility experience. After pushback from both the employees’ union and the City Council, a new leadership search has begun. No explanation has been provided for why the previous CEO was fired or what the mayor’s strategy is for City Light (or, for that matter, anything economic).
Seattle City Light has announced accelerating price increases, well above inflation, for the coming years:
Effective January 1, 2026, you will see the previously approved average rate increase of 5.4% start appearing on your bill.
Business customers can expect to see overall bill increases between 4% to 7%, depending on their customer class and consumption profile.
Advertisement
Looking ahead to 2027 and beyond, we anticipate annual rate increases of 7 to 10%
The utility also needs to nearly double its capacity—from 2,000 to 3,800 megawatts in the next seven years—independent of any data centers. A growing population, electric vehicles, heat pumps, and broader electrification are all driving load growth.
It will take deft management to keep our grid both affordable and reliable. A moratorium on new data centers isn’t enough to keep the lights on in Seattle, and solutions that don’t fit on a bumper sticker seem like a stretch for the political class.
Fresh Water on Tap
While we’re looking at city-owned utilities, Seattle Public Utilities faces serious challenges of its own. The utility recently received a striking vote of no confidence in its ability to provide its most basic service: water.
Advertisement
Eastside cities across Lake Washington, united as the Cascade Water Alliance, get their water from Seattle’s reservoirs. They have concerns about Seattle’s investment and maintenance, and after much analysis and negotiation, the Eastside is switching to get its water from Tacoma:
“[Tacoma Public Utilities’] proposal offered longer supply certainty, greater financial benefit, and an opportunity to move towards a regionalized water system.”
You can read a lot between those lines. The fact it will take 15 years to transition Eastside taps to Tacoma water suggests deep concerns about Seattle’s ability to deliver.
Beyond maintenance worries, this customer exodus also means the smaller remaining base of ratepayers will bear the system’s fixed costs, pointing to higher water bills ahead for Seattleites.
No Excuses
If data centers aren’t coming—and can’t be blamed—then rising electricity prices, capacity shortages, and reliability issues rest squarely with the mayor. The same goes for water.
Advertisement
Grandstanding about data centers is easy. Making difficult and unsatisfying tradeoffs to ensure our city utilities deliver is the hard part.
So by all means, ban the large data centers that were never coming. Clear the field. Remove the distractions.
We can focus entirely on how our city utilities perform under Mayor Wilson.
The Charlie Kirk assassination drove Apple to postpone the release of a politically charged series called “The Savant.” The decision led to pushback, but a new release has been set for July 2026.
‘The Savant’ will debut in July
The more products and services that Apple offers, the more likely it is to cross paths with modern events. While Apple had nothing to do with the murder of Charlie Kirk, it felt the need to push a show’s debut that hit a little too close to home. According to a report from Variety, The Savant will finally debut in July 2026, nearly a year from its original air date. Apple hasn’t updated its release date information on the website, but the news comes direct from show lead Jessica Chastain. Continue Reading on AppleInsider | Discuss on our Forums
Photo credit: 2 Warps to Neptune In 1974, Nintendo kicked off their coin-operated arcade era with Wild Gunman. This game required players to step up, pull a handgun from a holster, and face off against some unfriendly live-action gunslingers on a projection screen. Footage came from authentic film reels filmed on site in Japan, capturing the wild west-style shootouts in all their gritty grandeur. Timing was everything here. You could only draw and shoot after your eyes flashed and the word “FIRE” appeared on the screen. Get it right, and you’ll come out on top. If you mess up, draw too soon, or miss your shot, you will lose the duel.
Roughly a hundred units left the factory, the majority of which either stranded in warehouses or fell apart over time due to neglect. Today, just one original cabinet remains intact, and it is kept locked away in a private collection. That meant that for about 50 years, no one outside of that collection had the opportunity to play the game as it was intended. Everything changed when Callan Brown got wind of something unusual. The Canadian arcade collector and repair specialist spotted an eBay listing for the original 16mm film reels used in the Wild Gunman arcade cabinet, reportedly sourced from the warehouse of a retired operator in Saskatchewan. Recognizing their rarity, he moved quickly, placed the winning bid, and brought the reels home for his collection.
Officially licensed 1/4 scale TMNT Turtles in Time arcade cabinet by Konami built in wood for collectors and fans of retro arcade machines and mini…
Features the original Turtles in Time arcade ROM delivering authentic beat-’em-up action for enthusiasts who love Teenage Ninja Mutant Turtles and…
Includes mirror screen and vibrant cabinet artwork to replicate the original arcade game’s sci-fi visuals and immersive retro aesthetic
Brown first had to preserve the reels before sending them to a competent facility in Toronto for scanning. Some of the reels showed scratches and dust from years of intensive use, while others appeared to be in perfect condition. He stored the worst pieces safely while keeping the better frames. Unfortunately, two of the four duel sequences remain absent, but there was enough solid content to bring the basic game experience back.
Brown then began the rebuild by creating a basic scale model on his workshop, but things quickly became out of control. The next thing he knew, he was drafting full-size designs, cutting plywood sheets for the cabinet frame, and assembling it piece by piece. His wife, Natasha, worked hard to hand stitch the cloth side panels so they matched the original design flawlessly. On his 3D printer, the front control panel was crisp and clear, and the LED lights worked. Brown even printed the gun’s body and attached it with infrared sensors that tracked movement in the same manner that classic console controllers did.
A single digital projector now manages film playback inside the cabinet, and everything runs on custom Unity code written by Brown. It reads the player’s time, selects the appropriate film clip, verifies the shot position, and awards a badge if the player hits a clean shot. Insert two quarters into the coin slot, and the machine will scream to life. The attract loop plays on the screen, allowing the user to grab the gun. A gunslinger appears on the screen, his eyes flare, and you receive the command to fire. Draw quickly but not too quickly, and then land that shot as the victory music begins to play. Everything feels just like the original game from the 1970s.
A new email from Sony says that PlayStation will require players to verify their age later this year to keep using communication features like messages and voice chat. Insider-Gaming reports: The initiative comes from the goal of providing “safe, age-appropriate experiences for players and families while respecting their privacy” and providing “meaningful control over their gaming experiences.” The age-verification process will be implemented globally, and players will need to verify their age to continue using PlayStation communication services, such as messages and voice chat. If the player opts not to verify their age, they can still use other services, such as games, trophies, and the store. Only the communication experience will be affected if you choose not to verify your age. PlayStation didn’t provide a date for when players will need to begin the verification process.
Despite a bunch of Republican lawmakers being extremely (and mostly performatively) upset that their communications were accessed during investigations of the January 2021 insurrection attempt, the current version of the Trump administration seems to prefer a clean re-authorization of the surveillance powers it so recently deemed a dangerous part of the “deep state.”
The FISA court recently blessed an extension of this NSA collection, provided the government fixed the most problematic parts of it — that being other IC agencies’ warrantless access to US persons’ communications via “backdoor” searches of the foreign-facing surveillance dragnet.
Trump was having none of this, pressing the GOP to simply give the administration an un-reformed, un-repaired Section 702 that would presumably allow it to engage in the same abuses it was crying about less than a half-decade ago.
Fortunately for every American only allowed to vote by proxy every two-to-four years for surveillance reform, there is still no clean re-authorization on the books. The senator whose name is synonymous with surveillance reform — Ron Wyden — recently had this to say in his Bluesky post:
Advertisement
Update on where things stand on FISA: this deal is a win. We got the House to back down from an 18 month extension, buying us time to negotiate on real reforms. I’ll be fighting like hell for reforms that put your privacy first, and will have more to share soon.
Update on where things stand on FISA: this deal is a win. We got the House to back down from an 18 month extension, buying us time to negotiate on real reforms. I’ll be fighting like hell for reforms that put your privacy first, and will have more to share soon.
Not that congressional majority leader Mike Johnson wasn’t trying his damnedest to round up GOP support for a clean renewal that would give Trump what he wanted, and very little of what the GOP actually wanted, given its years of complaining about the FBI’s warrantless access to their communications.
Johnson’s dazzling play to reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) by five years ended in an excruciating defeat, as the bill failed after 20 Republicans joined Democrats in striking it down. One major reason it lost was that the warrant language baked into that measure not only would have codified existing law, but also would have made it easier for Section 702–acquired data to be used against Americans in criminal proceedings.
The 200-220 vote was called at 1:22 early Friday morning.
Advertisement
Baratta’s report refers to this as an “eleventh hour” burst of activity, but it’s actually well past that hour. We’re looking at 13th to 14th hour desperation here, especially since Johnson went back to the well again shortly after this first defeat.
The other shoe dropped during the vote on a rule to consider a clean 18-month extension of Section 702. That rule also failed at 2:07 a.m. in a 197-228 vote.
Given that the average congressional rep is pushing 58, both votes occurred well after bedtime. It’s a testimony to the resistance to clean re-authorization of Section 702 powers that these many reps were still on the floor to shut down Mike Johnson twice.
It also shows that Mike Johnson isn’t actually leading the Republican party. He’s restricted to doing whatever Trump wants, even if that clashes with what many party members want. To get skunked twice in two hours is embarrassing, which means Johnson may not remain majority leader for long, even if Democrats can’t flip the House following the mid-terms.
The good news is this: Congress only has until the end of this month to get a re-authorization passed. If it hopes to prevent this surveillance power from lapsing, Johnson and his fellow surveillance hawks are going to have to make some concessions, which may (finally!) include warrant requirements for searches of US persons’ communications by IC agencies with access to NSA collections.
Advertisement
On the other hand, when push comes to shove, far too many Republicans are willing to be Trump’s doormat and argue against their own interests, along with the interests of the constituents. But this is the most concerted challenge to Section 702 mounted yet. Even the Snowden leaks didn’t manage to get this done. But even if reforms are finally put in place, the public should remember GOP lawmakers did this because they want to shield themselves from domestic surveillance. That it might better protect their constituents is just an unavoidable side effect of their self-interest.
Tim Cook is stepping down as the CEO of Apple and transitioning to a role as the company’s executive chairman, effective September 1, the company announced on Monday. John Ternus, Apple’s senior vice president of hardware engineering, will replace Cook as CEO.
Cook’s departure had been speculated upon in recent months. In an era when every other Big Tech company has thrown significant resources at developing advanced AI, Apple is widely perceived as a laggard. Ternus’ old job will fall to Johny Srouji, who was elevated to chief hardware officer from a senior vice president on Monday. Srouji has been instrumental to Apple’s development of custom computer chips.
Cook’s legacy at Apple will be tied to the company’s tremendous financial growth over the past two decades. When he took over as CEO in 2011, the company’s market capitalization was around $350 billion; it is now north of $4 trillion. More than 2.5 billion people around the world used an Apple device as of January, according to the company.
During Cook’s tenure Apple launched both the Apple Watch and AirPods, important anchors for the company’s accessories unit, which generated nearly $36 billion in revenue during the last fiscal year. Its services business, which keeps consumers locked into Apple hardware and now accounts for over a quarter of the company’s total sales, grew from about $3 billion a quarter at the end of 2011 to about $30 billion in the final three months of last year.
Advertisement
But some of the projects developed under Cook, such as Apple’s self-driving car, were less successful. Apple Vision Pro, the company’s delayed foray into virtual reality headsets, was widely considered to be too expensive and failed to gain traction. While Cook expertly managed Apple’s production cycles during the global pandemic and quickly diversified the company’s supply chain when it encountered pressure from tariffs, Cook’s legacy is likely to be that of an operations master rather than a product innovator.
Cook’s dealings with China are also a part of his operational legacy, as China became not only a critical hub of manufacturing but also an important consumer market for Apple. As of last year, Apple held the top spot in smartphone market share in the country, with an estimated 22 percent. In recent years, though, Apple has faced scrutiny over what some lawmakers allege is the use of forced labor involving Uyghur Muslims by its contractors. Apple also reportedly tried to lobby against certain provisions in a 2020 bill that would have prevented forced labor in China.
Cook, like many tech CEOs, has cozied up to President Donald Trump since Trump’s return to the White House—sometimes even standing, grim-faced, beside the president at public events. Cook personally donated $1 million to Trump’s inauguration festivities in early 2025. He also appeared at Trump’s inauguration itself, alongside Elon Musk, Sundar Pichai, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg. In an odd display of fealty last August, Cook presented Trump with a custom Apple plaque that was nested in a 24-karat gold base. He also attended a private screening of the Melania documentary at the White House, hours after a federal immigration agent shot and killed nurse Alex Pretti during a street protest.
In 2014, the typically private Cook announced that he is gay in an op-ed in Bloomberg Businessweek. At the time, Cook wrote that being gay gave him a deeper understanding of “what it means to be in the minority and provided a window into the challenges that people in other minority groups deal with every day.” His experience had taught him to “rise above adversity and bigotry,” Cook wrote. He also cited concern for children being bullied as a motivation for him to speak out about his own experiences.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login