Travelers are unlikely to see major disruptions as the Trump administration reportedly moves closer to a bailout of bankrupt Spirit Airlines, industry experts say.

Officials are discussing a roughly $500 million deal to help Spirit exit bankruptcy – an arrangement that could leave the federal government with up to a 90% stake in the low-cost carrier, Reuters reported.

For most Americans, the situation is not expected to affect summer travel plans, according to aviation consultant Mike Boyd.

“Travelers don’t have to worry,” Boyd told FOX Business, calling the situation a “sideshow” for the average flyer.

TED CRUZ POURS COLD WATER ON TRUMP ADMINISTRATION PLAN TO BAIL OUT SPIRIT AIRLINES: ‘TERRIBLE IDEA’

Spirit Airlines airplanes at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on Oct. 24, 2023. (Eva Marie Uzcategui/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

However, Boyd noted there could be some uncertainty for passengers already booked on Spirit as the airline navigates the bankruptcy process.

Aviation expert and former National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigator Mike Coffield told FOX Business that government intervention could ultimately lead to higher fares.

“It will raise fares, not lower them,” Coffield said, adding that a bailout could be unfair to other airlines. “They will also get capital at little risk, until they lose it all and the taxpayer money.”

Coffield, noting his role in drafting the Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, argued the government should “step in only in a national crisis or interest.”

Coffield also said that if Spirit were to shut down, other carriers – including American, Southwest, United, JetBlue and Allegiant – would likely quickly fill the gap and hire displaced workers.

TRUMP SAYS HE WANTS ‘SOMEBODY’ TO BUY SPIRIT AIRLINES, OPPOSES UNITED-AMERICAN MERGER

Passengers check in for their Spirit Airlines flights at O’Hare Airport on March 10, 2026, in Chicago, Illinois.  (Scott Olson/Getty Images)

“If you can look historically, wherever there’s been an airline that stopped service, within six months most of all those people are rehired in their original jobs wearing different uniforms,” Coffield said.

Gary Leff, author of the aviation blog “View From the Wing,” said keeping Spirit afloat could “weaken” competitors like Frontier Airlines and JetBlue.

“Keeping Spirit Airlines alive weakens other airlines, though, especially Frontier Airlines – Spirit’s major ultra-low cost competitor – and JetBlue, their largest competitor at Fort Lauderdale,” he told FOX Business. “Once the government controls Spirit Airlines, that even raises safety concerns because the government both becomes the safety regulator and owner of the airline they’re regulating.”

Meanwhile, Clint Henderson, travel expert at “The Points Guy,” said consumers would “likely benefit” if Spirit remains in operation.

“This would be good for keeping prices lower as it would protect a low-cost carrier, so the news is potentially good news for consumers… at least for now,” Henderson told FOX Business. “Everyone loves to hate Spirit until they leave a market and fares go up.”

RISING FUEL COSTS THREATEN SPIRIT AIRLINES’ BANKRUPTCY EXIT PLAN: REPORTS

President Donald Trump is seen walking off of Air Force One at Miami International Airport on April 11, 2026, in Miami, Florida (Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)

The proposed financing would likely begin as a loan to keep Spirit operating during bankruptcy and convert into longer-term funding after it exits. 

A lawyer for the airline confirmed Thursday that it is in advanced discussions with federal officials, Reuters reported.

“Spirit Airlines would be on a much firmer financial footing had the Biden administration not recklessly blocked the airline’s merger with JetBlue,” White House spokesman Kush Desai told FOX Business. “The Trump administration continues to monitor the situation and overall health of the U.S. aviation industry that millions of Americans rely on every day for essential travel and their livelihoods.”

CLICK HERE TO GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO

FOX Business reached out to Spirit Airlines for comment.

Reuters contributed to this report.

British workers and the businesses that employ them have been clobbered by the steepest increase in employment taxes of any advanced economy, according to fresh analysis from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

The Paris-based body’s annual audit of payroll taxes lays the blame squarely at the door of Chancellor Rachel Reeves, whose October 2024 Budget raised employers’ national insurance contributions and extended the freeze on personal income tax thresholds — a combination that has quietly tightened the screws on payrolls across the country.

For an average-earning worker in the UK, the so-called “tax wedge”, the gap between what it costs an employer to put someone on the books and what the employee actually takes home, climbed to 32.4 per cent last year, up from just under 30 per cent the year before. That 2.45 percentage point jump dwarfs the OECD-wide average rise of a mere 0.15 points and outpaces every other country in the 38-nation study. Only Estonia (1.95), Germany (1.34) and Israel (1.09) posted increases above a single percentage point.

While Britain’s absolute tax wedge still sits below the OECD average of 35.1 per cent, the velocity of the change is what has alarmed economists. The OECD warned that a widening wedge “tends to reduce incentives to work and hire by reducing take-home pay and increasing employers’ labour costs”, a particularly bruising message for the small and medium-sized enterprises that dominate Britain’s private-sector payroll.

The damage stems from two deliberate choices in the Chancellor’s maiden Budget. First, Reeves slashed the earnings threshold at which employers start paying national insurance to £5,000 from £9,100, a move that hit hardest those firms employing part-time workers and lower-paid staff, think cafés, care homes, corner shops and hospitality operators. Second, the headline rate of employers’ national insurance climbed from 13.8 per cent to 15 per cent.

The Treasury’s £25 billion-a-year revenue raiser has been accompanied by a stealthier levy: personal income tax thresholds remain frozen at 2021-22 levels until 2031, pulling more workers into basic and higher-rate bands as nominal wages creep up, the phenomenon known as fiscal drag.

The labour market is already showing the strain. Since the Chancellor first unveiled the employer NI rise in October 2024, payrolled employment has fallen by 143,000, according to official figures. The economic inactivity rate, the proportion of working-age adults neither in work nor looking for it, nudged up to 21 per cent in the three months to February, from 20.7 per cent in the previous quarter.

That deterioration pre-dates the eight-week-old US and Israeli airstrikes on Iran, which the OECD warned this month would inflict the largest growth hit in the G20 on Britain and the sharpest inflation jolt in the G7. Economists expect unemployment to climb further as households and firms rein in spending to cope with the conflict-driven surge in energy costs.

The OECD has repeatedly urged successive governments to tackle the “large compliance costs” baked into Britain’s tax code, arguing that complexity itself is a drag on hiring and growth. For the nation’s SMEs, already contending with higher borrowing costs, sluggish consumer demand and an unsettled global backdrop, the twin pressures of a rising tax wedge and an increasingly byzantine rulebook make the case for reform harder to ignore.

Whether the Chancellor heeds that advice in her next fiscal set-piece will be watched closely by business owners who have spent the past eighteen months absorbing a rise in employment costs unmatched anywhere in the developed world.

Jamie Young

Jamie is Senior Reporter at Business Matters, bringing over a decade of experience in UK SME business reporting.
Jamie holds a degree in Business Administration and regularly participates in industry conferences and workshops.

When not reporting on the latest business developments, Jamie is passionate about mentoring up-and-coming journalists and entrepreneurs to inspire the next generation of business leaders.

It gained a third in about a week. But the small float and low delivery volumes is an alert against wagering on it for some who fear it may have risen beyond its fundamentals when many other newly-listed companies are trading below their sale price.

“The rally in Lovable Lingerie is more a momentum play with hardly any genuine interest,” says Sharad Rathi, associate director at Almondz Global Securities.

“The valuations seem to be a bit out of whack.” Lovable that sold shares at Rs 205 apiece, has risen 109% to Rs 428.5 on Friday after touching a high of Rs 462.50. Some of the top shareholders include HDFC Mutual Fund, SBI Funds, UTI Asset management and Fidelity, filings show.

Total outstanding shares of the firm is at 1.68 crore and public holding is about 50 lakh shares. The Sensex was down 2.6% during the period and the BSE IPO index was up 1.6%. Fineotex Chemical and C Mahendra Exports are the two companies that have returned more than Lovable, among this years’ IPOs.

Live Events

The stock trades at 31 times forecast earnings for fiscal 2012, compared with Page Industries’ 27 times its earnings. Although the stock had been among the top traded in the last few days, gaining to limit on some days, the number of shares that changed had remained negligible. The quantity of shares actually changing hands — was in single digit for many days.
The delivery ratio was 2% to 9% between June 10 and 17 when the stock moved up 33% on BSE, exchange data show. This follows the performance of Page Industries which has gained 396% since its IPO in March 2007. Shares that were sold at Rs 396 apiece are trading at Rs 1,784. “Rising disposable incomes and growing awareness about personal hygiene are boosting growth of the innerwear market in India,” said Anand Rathi Secutities in a recent report. “Also enhancing this growth is the rising modern trade malls, shopping complexes etc,” said the brokerage which has a target price of Rs 430.

The Mumbai-based company’s Rs 93-crore IPO drew good response with it getting subscribed 21.8 times the institutional portion, 98.5 times among wealthy individuals and 20.5 times in the retail category. Rise in raw material prices and intensifying competition are the two risks for earnings growth, the report said.

Add as a Reliable and Trusted News Source

As Americans head into barbecue season, rising energy prices linked to Middle East tensions are driving up the cost of propane.

When energy prices rise, the added costs ripple through the food system and into everyday purchases, from meat counters to backyard grills.

“The impact of ongoing challenges in the Middle East on energy prices impacts nearly every facet of the U.S. economy and beef cattle are not immune,” Glynn Tonsor, a professor of agricultural economics at Kansas State University, told FOX Business.

BUYING A HOME JUST GOT MORE EXPENSIVE AS THE IRAN WAR DRIVES UP MORTGAGE RATES

Propane, the fuel powering many backyard grills, is also getting more expensive as global energy markets tighten due to the war in Iran. (iStock)

Ranchers rely on fuel at nearly every step, from running tractors to transporting cattle, and those higher costs are often passed on to consumers, Tonsor said.

Those pressures are showing up in energy markets. Gas prices now average about $4.02 a gallon, up roughly 86 cents from a month ago, according to AAA, while diesel – a key fuel for freight – has climbed to $5.49, up about $1.90 over the past year, making it more expensive to move cattle and beef across the country.

GAS SURGE TIED TO IRAN CONFLICT HITS SWING STATES, TESTING TRUMP’S LOW-PRICE PITCH

The ripple effects go far beyond beef.

Propane, the fuel powering many backyard grills, is also getting more expensive as global energy markets tighten because countries in the Middle East are such major suppliers to the world.

U.S. propane prices at the Mont Belvieu hub, the industry benchmark for this type of power, have surged nearly 19% since the conflict began in late February.

But higher energy costs are only part of the story.

Cattle supply remains slow to respond. Unlike oil or metals, where supply can be increased relatively quickly, cattle production takes years to ramp up after a dip.

BEEF PRICES ARE CLOSE TO RECORD HIGHS — BUT AMERICANS AREN’T CUTTING BACK

The Trump administration says it’s working to bring down beef prices by boosting supply through more imports from Argentina, while laying the groundwork for a long-term plan to strengthen the U.S. cattle industry. (Melissa Phillip/Houston Chronicle/Getty Images / Getty Images)

The U.S. cattle herd is now at its smallest size in 75 years, which is keeping the supply tight following years of drought, rising costs and an aging ranching workforce resulting in producers needing to cut back.

That tight supply is already pushing prices higher – and the Iran conflict is only adding to the pressure.

According to U.S. Department of Agriculture data, the average price of beef climbed from about $8.70 per pound in March 2025 to $10.08 a year later, an increase of roughly 16%.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

Subsequently, even if energy prices ease, beef prices likely won’t be quick to follow.

For shoppers, that could mean higher grocery bills this summer – and pricier cookouts – depending on whether demand holds or consumers switch to cheaper alternatives. Much of that will depend on forces far beyond Americans’ backyards.

This article was written by

Follow

Reacting to the latest borrowing figures, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, James Murray, said: “Our deficit is down £19.8bn because of our plan to cut borrowing. In a volatile world the decisions we are taking are the right ones to keep costs down, take back our energy security and cut borrowing and debt.”

“Through the project, we’ve demonstrated that existing work vehicles can be turned into a digital workforce,” said Paul Newman of autonomous vehicle software firm Oxa

A project using autonomous vehicles at one of the region’s busiest ports has been hailed as a major milestone.

The Port‑Connected and Automated Logistics (P-Cal) project saw a fully automated tractor used at the Port of Tyne – a move which organisers of the project say its proof of the technology’s capability in complex, real-world scenarios. The effort was led by the industry cluster the North East Automotive Alliance, along with the Port of Tyne, Oxa and a consortium of others, and was delivered through the UK Government’s CAM Pathfinder programme.

It saw an autonomous container transport system designed and tested in the busy quayside environment, building on earlier trails in the region such as 5G CAL and V-CAL initiatives.

Paul Butler, CEO of the NEAA, said: “P‑CAL represents a defining moment in the North East’s journey from pilot projects to real‑world autonomous operations. This project has demonstrated not only technical capability, but the strength of collaboration across industry, academia and Government.

“The learning gained here will shape future CAM deployment and reinforces the region’s position as a national leader in connected and automated mobility.”

Consortium partners said the work strengthen the case for wider use of autonomous vehicles, showing they can be used safely and reliably in a controlled area of the port. A next phase of the project will examine how the system performs amongst multiple vehicles working alongside people, equipment and live commercial activity.

Graeme Hardie, operations director at the Port of Tyne, said: “Delivering autonomous logistics in a live port environment has been a major step forward for the sector. P‑CAL has shown what’s possible when innovation is applied to real operational challenges, improving safety, efficiency and sustainability. The Port of Tyne is proud to have played a leading role in a project that will influence how ports across the UK and beyond approach automation.”

The project was delivered by a regional and national partnership led by the NEAA, bringing together the Port of Tyne, autonomous vehicle software firm Oxa, Nissan, Newcastle University, Angoka, Logisteed UK Limited (formerly Vantec Europe Limited) and Womble Bond Dickinson. The partners say autonomous systems can take on repetitive or more hazardous tasks and allow skilled workers to focus on higher-value roles.

Paul Newman, founder and CEO at Oxa, said: “The success of P-CAL proves how autonomy will enable the future of resilient logistics operations. Through the project, we’ve demonstrated that existing work vehicles can be turned into a digital workforce – successfully completing autonomous container movements in a dynamic quayside environment, while proving worksite intelligence necessary for real-time industrial optimisation.

“P-CAL provides a blueprint for how ports and industrial hubs worldwide can deploy autonomous technology to drive productivity, efficiency and safety.”

Mark Cracknell, programme director at automated mobility specialist Zenzic, said: “P‑CAL is a strong example of how government and industry can work together to accelerate the commercial readiness of CAM technologies. Projects like this are vital in turning innovation into deployment, creating high‑value jobs and ensuring the UK remains globally competitive in connected and automated mobility.”