The crypto market ticked higher on Friday. Bitcoin BTC$77,292.85 rose 1.25% since midnight UTC to trade at $77,250, and the CoinDesk 20 Index (CD20) added 0.7% with 14 members in the green.

The increase comes after bitcoin found support at $75,000, a price it had earlier found difficult to climb above, on Wednesday. It has now been trapped between $75,000 and $80,000 since April 19. Negative funding rates on futures exchanges indicate that traders are generally positioned for a decline.

U.S. equity index futures were little changed. Nasdaq 100 futures cooled after the week’s Big Tech earnings, while S&P 500 futures are marginally in the black, up 5 points.

Precious metals fell, with gold and silver losing 1% and 0.7%, respectively, and the altcoin market is a mixed bag; AXS and HYPE rose by around 3%, but DeFi tokens MORPHO and AAVE are both in the red.

Derivatives positioning

• Open interest in bitcoin futures holds at $19 billion, roughly unchanged week-over-week, with speculative activity showing little conviction.
• Funding rates are broadly negative across multiple venues at around -2% annualized, except on Deribit, which saw a spike to 37%. The three-month annualized basis sits at 1.5%, also flat on the week, pointing to continued institutional caution.
• Options sentiment leans bullish: put/call volume over the past 24 hours is 58% in favor of calls, and the one-week delta skew has eased to 8.6% from 9.5%, indicating moderating demand for downside protection.
• The implied volatility term structure is in contango, with the front-end around 29% rising to ~45% at the March ’27 tenor, suggesting the market is pricing longer-dated uncertainty rather than immediate tail risk.
• CoinGlass data shows $149 million in 24-hour liquidations, with a 30-70 split between longs and shorts. BTC ($50 million) and ETH ($29 million) led in terms of notional liquidations.
• The Binance liquidation heatmap indicates $75,400 as a core liquidation level to monitor in the event of a price drop.

Token talk

• The CoinDesk Memecoin Index (CDMEME) was the best-performing benchmark, surging by 1.8%, followed by the CoinDesk Computing Select Index (CPUS), which added 1.4%.
• CoinDesk’s DeFi Select Index (DFX) lagged its peers, and was recently unchanged despite broader market optimism.
• Monad (MON) led the altcoin market on Friday, rallying by 6.7% over 24 hours. There were also notable gains for PENDLE, RAY and TAO, all up between 4.2% and 5.35%.
• The same can’t be said for WLFI$0.05701, the DeFi token linked to President Donald Trump’s family. That dropped by more than 2.6% since midnight following a governance vote on token lock-ups. It has now lost more than 77% since it was introduced in September.
• CoinDesk’s Overnight Rate (CDOR), which tracks lending and borrowing rates on Aave, has returned to normal market conditions after the KelpDAO hack, a sign of strength in the DeFi sector.

If traditional finance is a well-regulated city, DeFi’s experimental edge is the desert just beyond the walls—lawless, creative, and occasionally full of gold. This is where protocols stop copying TradFi and start inventing entirely new financial primitives. It’s also where things break… a lot.

Let’s get into it.

The Rise of New Primitives

Experimental DeFi isn’t about slightly improving lending or swapping—it’s about redefining what those things even mean.

You’ll see:

• Liquidity as a game mechanic (protocols turning LPing into PvP strategy)
• Time-based finance (locking assets into future yield markets)
• Reflexive token systems where price feeds back into utility
• Protocol-owned liquidity (POL) replacing mercenary capital

A classic example is Olympus DAO, which introduced bonding as a way for protocols to own liquidity instead of renting it. It sounded insane at first—until half the market copied it.

Then there’s Yearn Finance, which turned yield farming into a set-it-and-forget-it strategy engine—now a core building block across DeFi.

The pattern? Today’s “weird experiment” becomes tomorrow’s standard—if it survives.

What Fails vs What Sticks

Most experimental DeFi projects fail. Not because the ideas are bad—but because the execution, incentives, or timing are off.

What Usually Fails:

• Unsustainable yields (APYs that rely purely on token emissions)
• Overly complex mechanics (if users need a PhD, they’re out)
• Reflexive death spirals (price down → confidence down → liquidity gone)
• Narrative-only protocols (hype without real usage)

We’ve seen entire ecosystems collapse under this weight—think of the fallout from Terra collapse, where experimental stablecoin mechanics unraveled at scale.

What Actually Sticks:

• Clear utility + real demand
• Simple UX wrapped around complex logic
• Aligned incentives between users and protocol
• Composable design (others can build on it)

Protocols that win don’t just innovate—they integrate into the broader DeFi stack.

How to Analyze Early-Stage Protocols

Looking at experimental DeFi is less about reading dashboards—and more about reading intent.

Here’s a sharper framework:

1. What’s the Core Innovation?

Is this actually new—or just a remix of existing primitives?

2. Where Does Yield Come From?

If the answer is “token emissions,” be careful. If it’s real fees, arbitrage, or productivity, now we’re talking.

3. Who Benefits Most?

Early insiders? The protocol treasury? Or long-term users?

4. Can It Survive Without Growth?

If the system collapses when new users stop coming in, that’s not DeFi—that’s musical chairs.

5. Is It Composable?

Can other protocols plug into it? If not, it may never escape its own sandbox.

The “Would You Actually Use This?” Test

This is where most experimental DeFi falls apart.

Forget the whitepaper. Forget the tokenomics. Ask one simple question:

Would you use this if there were no rewards?

If the answer is no, then the protocol is likely:

• Subsidizing behavior, not creating value
• Dependent on hype cycles
• One market downturn away from irrelevance

But if the answer is yes—even without incentives—that’s where things get interesting.

That’s how you spot early conviction plays before the crowd arrives.

The Trade-Off: Innovation vs Risk

Experimental DeFi is where the highest upside lives—but it comes with:

• Smart contract risk
• Economic design flaws
• Governance attacks
• Liquidity shocks

It’s not about avoiding risk—it’s about understanding which risks are worth taking

Final Thought

Experimental DeFi is messy, chaotic, and often irrational.

But it’s also where the future gets prototyped in real time.

Most ideas will fail. A few will reshape the entire industry.

Your edge isn’t predicting which one wins—it’s recognizing why something might.

Because in the Wild West of DeFi, survival isn’t luck.

Its design.

REQUEST AN ARTICLE.

A group of Bitcoiners has launched a new open-source AI tool that generates evidence-based responses to misconceptions about Bitcoin’s environmental impact, energy use and its role in the financial system. 

Nordic-based Bitcoin education platform Bitcoin Beyond 66 said it built “The Bitcoin Evidence Base” at a time when there is a “growing body of peer-reviewed research” showing the environmental benefits of Bitcoin mining, but “outdated data, methodologically weak studies, or plain lack of knowledge” continue to negatively shape public perception.

The database seeks to offer users quick access to relevant, evidence-based information about Bitcoin mining and related topics so they can share it with social media posters who have knowingly or unknowingly spread incorrect information about Bitcoin. 

“The problem is that most people don’t have time to read 22+ peer-reviewed papers, Cambridge reports and ERCOT data. When someone posts criticism on social media, you need a credible response — fast.”

Display of The Bitcoin Evidence Base. Source: Bitcoin Beyond 66

The environmental impact of Bitcoin mining has been heavily debated for over a decade, drawing criticisms from some members of the United Nations and governments over concerns that it contributes to global warming.

However, Bitcoin environmentalists such as Daniel Batten argue that Bitcoin mining now uses a much larger share of lower-carbon and renewable energy sources, making many of the old narratives outdated.

The Bitcoin Evidence Base works by generating evidence-based responses to Bitcoin-related criticisms submitted by users via text or links. 

Cointelegraph found that The Bitcoin Evidence Base routinely cites an April 2025 University of Cambridge study that found more than 52% of Bitcoin is now mined using renewable energy sources.

The database also points out that Bitcoin’s renewable energy mix is higher than that of the banking sector and that more than 22 peer-reviewed studies have documented the environmental benefits of Bitcoin.

There’s an art to addressing Bitcoin FUD

BB66 said the AI-powered database implements Batten’s Bitcoin “communication playbook” to counter Bitcoin misinformation with “evidence and empathy.”

This strategy includes acknowledging what was true about the criticisms before addressing the misconceptions in a way that aims to educate the person and the broader public rather than seeking to win a debate.

Related: Repeated Bitcoin profit taking near $77K suggests rally is losing steam 

“If you’re trying to ‘own’ someone, you’ll trigger their defenses and accomplish nothing,” the Nordic-based Bitcoin group said.

Bitcoin Beyond 66’s tips for Bitcoiners seeking to counter FUD. Source: Bitcoin Beyond 66

The database offers users three tones to use in response to criticism: direct, balanced and soft.

Users can help build the database by sharing papers and website links with BB66 for review before inclusion.

Magazine: Adam Back says current demand is ‘almost’ enough to send Bitcoin to $1M

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.

Bitcoin (BTC) eyed $77,500 on Friday after US stocks posted fresh record highs on strong tech earnings.

Key points:

• Bitcoin continues a rebound after the monthly close as stocks hit record highs.
• Strong tech earnings propel the S&P 500 over 7,200 points for the first time in history.
• PCE inflation data nears its highest levels in three years, prompting speculation about next month’s numbers.

Bitcoin creeps higher while S&P 500 makes history

Data from TradingView showed near 12% April BTC price gains as risk assets ignored rising US inflation signs.

BTC/USD one-month chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

The S&P 500 reached nearly 7,220 points before closing ten points lower, propelled by stronger-than-expected earnings from Google and Apple.

Reacting on X, trading resource The Kobeissi Letter noted that the S&P had added over $8 trillion in market cap since hitting local lows at the end of March.

“A year ago it was at 5,600. 5 years ago it was at 4,200. 10 years ago it was at 2,100,” Charlie Bilello, chief market strategist at wealth manager Creative Planning, added.

S&P 500 one-day chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

While Bitcoin’s gains were less pronounced, markets en masse appeared uninterested in US inflation warnings.

The March print of the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) came in at 3.5%, per data from the US Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), marking its highest since August 2023.

Known as the Federal Reserve’s “preferred” inflation gauge, PCE had previously conformed to market estimates.

“In the first month of the Iran War, US inflation hit a 3-year high,” Kobeissi commented. 

“April’s data will be interesting.”

US PCE Indexes. Source: BEA

BTC price still struggling with support reclaim

Bitcoin thus closed out April’s monthly candle with mixed messages.

Related: Bitcoin Coinbase Premium threatens bear flag repeat with BTC price at $76K

At 11.9%, BTC/USD saw its highest monthly gains in a year, CoinGlass data confirmed, but the monthly candle fell short of reclaiming key support lines.

BTC/USD monthly returns (screenshot). Source: CoinGlass

As Cointelegraph reported, these included the 21-week exponential moving average (EMA), with only a single weekly close above it since last October.

“The Bitcoin pullback continues and this is looking more and more like an EMA rejection, especially if BTC isn’t able to Weekly Close above the EMA by end of week,” trader and analyst Rekt Capital warned X followers on Wednesday.

He added that a retest of the mid-$60,000 zone on weekly time frames was “technically necessary to achieve full breakout confirmation.”

BTC/USD one-week chart. Source: Rekt Capital/X

This article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice or recommendations. All investments and trades carry risk; readers are encouraged to conduct independent research.

Key Takeaways

• On April 30, NuScale Power (SMR) stock climbed more than 10% following Amazon’s announcement of three agreements supporting small modular reactor initiatives, featuring a $500 million stake in competitor X-energy.
• Despite not being directly involved in Amazon’s partnerships, NuScale benefited from the positive sentiment spreading across the entire SMR industry.
• Short sellers covering their positions intensified the upward movement as the share price accelerated.
• NuScale holds the distinction of being the sole American firm with Nuclear Regulatory Commission-certified SMR technology.
• With a market capitalization hovering around $3.88 billion, the stock had declined more than 20% year-to-date prior to this rally.

---

Shares of NuScale Power (SMR) climbed more than 10% on April 30, 2026, propelled by widespread optimism throughout the nuclear energy industry after Amazon revealed three strategic partnerships supporting small modular reactor development — highlighted by a $500 million commitment to competitor X-energy.

NuScale Power Corporation, SMR

Amazon’s announcement didn’t include NuScale among its chosen partners. Yet the stock rallied regardless.

This reaction reveals much about investor sentiment within the SMR market. When a technology giant commits hundreds of millions toward clean energy infrastructure, every company in that ecosystem benefits. Market participants rushed into nuclear-related equities en masse.

A short squeeze magnified the gains. NuScale has attracted significant short interest, and as share prices rose, pessimistic traders scrambled to exit their bearish bets. This forced buying created additional upward momentum.

NuScale’s Current Position

Trading at approximately $3.88 billion in market capitalization, NuScale occupies a compelling position. Competitor Oklo — another dedicated SMR developer — commands a valuation nearly triple that size. Before Wednesday’s surge, NuScale shares had declined more than 20% since the year began.

What distinguishes NuScale from competitors: it stands alone as the only American enterprise possessing Nuclear Regulatory Commission certification for its SMR technology. Securing this regulatory approval required years of effort and cannot be quickly duplicated. In an industry still establishing credibility, this achievement carries significant weight.

However, Bank of America research suggests substantial SMR deployment won’t materialize until 2030 or later, potentially extending to 2035. While the underlying technology exists, commercial markets remain undeveloped.

Long-Term Outlook and Challenges

NuScale’s business model emphasizes utility-scale installations. This differentiates the company from Oklo, which pursues smaller, customized deployments — such as dedicated power systems for individual data center facilities. Both approaches have merit. Neither has achieved large-scale validation.

Bank of America estimates the broader nuclear sector opportunity could reach approximately $10 trillion over three decades. Within that landscape, research indicates the SMR segment specifically may represent $1.5 trillion. Even capturing a modest portion would generate substantial returns relative to NuScale’s present valuation.

One market observer noted: a 2,000% appreciation from current levels would still leave NuScale’s market cap below $100 billion.

Yet such extraordinary gains would demand perfect execution across multiple fronts — sustained expansion in AI data center requirements, nuclear energy capturing meaningful market share of that demand, SMR technology achieving real-world commercial success, and NuScale’s utility-focused design emerging as an industry standard. This represents a considerable series of contingencies.

Daily trading activity for SMR averages approximately 27 million shares, demonstrating intense market attention on this equity. Technical indicators entering the week suggested bearish momentum, making Wednesday’s spike particularly noteworthy.

Despite the recent pop, NuScale’s year-to-date performance remained negative, with shares still down roughly 20% through April’s closing session.

Key Highlights

• Canadian pension giant Alberta Investment Management Corporation (AIMCo), overseeing $142B in assets, acquired 1.38M MSTR shares valued at approximately $219M
• AIMCo’s purchase represents its inaugural investment in a Bitcoin-focused treasury corporation
• Weekly Bitcoin acquisitions by Strategy plummeted 91%, declining from 34,164 BTC to just 3,273 BTC due to changes in capital sourcing
• MSTR finished April with a 33% gain, marking its first monthly advance after eight consecutive months of declines totaling 75%
• Strategy’s Bitcoin reserves reached 818,334 BTC, maintaining a narrow lead over BlackRock’s 810,077 BTC holdings

---

Strategy (MSTR) secured a significant institutional investor this week when AIMCo, a fund managing approximately $142 billion in assets, acquired 1.38 million shares of MSTR valued at roughly $219 million. The transaction represents the Canadian pension manager’s initial foray into Bitcoin treasury corporations.

Strategy Inc, MSTR

In Thursday’s premarket trading, MSTR climbed 1.03% to reach $159.82 following the announcement. This uptick came after the stock experienced a 4.54% decline in the previous session, settling at $158.19 on Wednesday.

AIMCo joins a growing roster of institutional investors expanding their MSTR positions. Capital Group recently increased its holdings by 4.32 million shares through its American Funds Fundamental Investors vehicle, elevating its total position to 10.33 million shares with a current valuation of approximately $1.63 billion.

Vanguard made its own strategic addition during April, acquiring over 1.2 million shares valued at $195 million at the time of purchase. The investment giant now controls slightly more than 2 million shares through its VOE ETF, presently worth around $323 million.

Significant Slowdown in Bitcoin Accumulation

Strategy’s most recent Bitcoin acquisition showed a dramatic decrease compared to the preceding week. The company secured 3,273 BTC for $255 million, a stark contrast to the 34,164 BTC purchased for $2.54 billion the week before — representing a 91% reduction in acquisition volume.

The deceleration stemmed from Strategy’s funding approach. Instead of utilizing its preferred STRC stock, the company relied on common stock sales this time, which constrained the amount of capital available for deployment.

Despite the reduced acquisition pace, market sentiment suggests Strategy will maintain its accumulation strategy. Polymarket data indicates only a 10% likelihood that the company will liquidate any Bitcoin holdings before 2026 concludes.

Strategy’s cumulative Bitcoin position now totals 818,334 BTC, obtained through investments exceeding $61.8 billion. This positions the company marginally ahead of BlackRock, whose Bitcoin holdings stand at 810,077 BTC.

MSTR’s Turnaround and STRC Dividend Stability

April marked a significant reversal for MSTR. The stock concluded the month at $165, representing a 33% increase — the first monthly gain following eight consecutive months of losses. Between August 2025 and March 2026, the stock had experienced a cumulative 75% decline.

Bitcoin demonstrated similar strength during April, advancing 12% to deliver its strongest monthly performance since April 2025.

Regarding the preferred shares, Strategy maintained the STRC dividend rate at 11.5% for May, the third straight month at this level. STRC’s volume weighted average price for April registered at $99.76, sufficiently close to its $100 par value to justify keeping the rate unchanged.

STRC currently trades at $99.75 and has remained below par value since April 15.

Strategy is evaluating the possibility of transitioning to semi-monthly dividend distributions for STRC as a measure to minimize price fluctuations.

TipRanks analysts maintain a Strong Buy consensus rating on MSTR, with a mean price target of $283.33.

Bitcoin BTC$77,239.01 rose more than 1.2% during the European morning to reach just shy of $77,500 for a lift of about 1.7% in the last 24 hours.

The broader digital asset market, as measured by the CoinDesk 20 Index (CD20), also ticked higher, up around 0.95%.

Bitcoin’s gains came on above-average volume, with 24-hour activity running 15% above its seven-day average, indicating steady participation, according to CoinDesk Research’s technical analysis data model.

Derivatives markets may tell a more cautious story. Open interest in the June 26 $76,000 put option surged 22.5%, pointing to increased demand for downside protection near current price levels. The spike suggests institutional participants are positioning defensively, either locking in gains or preparing for potential declines.

Furthermore, bitcoin worth over $770 million has been sent to exchanges in the last week, analyst Ali Martinez post on X, citing data from Santiment. This action is generally regarded as a pre-sale step, pointing to the possibility of considerable selling pressure in the near future.

Bitcoin’s tight correlation with the CD20 — showing only a 0.15% deviation — suggests macro forces, rather than crypto-specific catalysts, continue to drive price action. The index, which captures a large share of the digital asset market value, reinforces that BTC is trading as part of a broader risk complex rather than independently.

Technical levels at $76,200 and $77,000 remain critical as traders balance constructive price trends against defensive derivatives positioning.

TLDR:

• Broad altseason is considered an artefact of the past as too many coins chase shrinking speculative capital pools.
• Long-tail tokens have shifted from high risk, high reward to near-instant value destruction within seconds of holding.
• Bitcoin and Ethereum have underperformed historical recovery expectations, weakening the buy-the-dip anchor strategy.
• Institutional money is flowing into AI while retail traders favour stocks, pulling key demand drivers away from crypto markets.

---

The crypto market this cycle has delivered a stark reality check for traders who expected history to repeat. The familiar pattern of broad altcoin rallies lifting entire portfolios has failed to materialise in any meaningful way.

Prominent analyst CryptoCred laid out a detailed breakdown of what has changed and why. The post, shared on X, points to structural shifts rather than temporary setbacks. Traders are now confronting a market that demands far more than simple participation.

Altseason Is Gone and the Speculative Landscape Has Turned Dangerous

The crypto market no longer operates on the broad wealth-effect cycle that defined earlier bull runs. Too many coins now compete for a pool of speculative capital that has not grown proportionally.

That supply-demand imbalance makes a rising tide scenario nearly impossible to replicate. The analyst stated plainly that “broad brush alt season is an artefact of the past.”

The long-tail speculative end of the market has become structurally more hostile. What once offered high risk with equally high reward has shifted toward near-certain loss for holders.

The current environment is one where a token can be taken to zero within seconds. That speed of destruction removes any practical window for risk management.

Centralised exchanges, once the engine of retail speculation, have lost their grip on this activity. Excess speculation has migrated into bundled token environments operating in maximum player-versus-player conditions.

This shift means the mechanisms that once drove altcoin momentum are no longer functioning in the same venues. Retail traders chasing that old playbook are entering a fundamentally different game.

Correlation across the crypto market has also tightened to a degree that eliminates sector-based strategy. Assets that once moved independently now collapse together during drawdowns.

This convergence has been described as “a tightly correlated mush,” particularly on the downside. That removes one of the few tools traders historically used to manage portfolio risk across different crypto segments.

Blue Chips Have Disappointed and Strategy Must Now Evolve

Even the historically reliable anchors of the crypto market have underperformed this cycle. Bitcoin and Ethereum, long considered safe entries during deep drawdowns, have not produced the explosive recoveries traders expected.

The assumption that all-time highs are guaranteed and predictable has weakened considerably. That shift challenges one of the most widely held beliefs in long-term crypto investing.

CryptoCred noted the cycle was “extremely concentrated versus broad brush wealth effect.” Something also visibly broke in market structure after October 2024, which was flagged directly in the analysis.

These two factors together mark a clean departure from previous cycle behaviour. Traders relying on past templates are now working with an outdated map.

Institutional capital has largely moved toward artificial intelligence, not crypto. Retail speculative energy has followed single-name stocks and zero-day equity options instead.

That dual departure strips away two demand drivers that historically supported altcoin momentum. The competition for speculative attention is now broader and more intense than any previous cycle.

Both timing and selection now carry equal weight for any trader operating in this environment. Participation alone no longer generates an edge the way it did when the asset class was earlier and less crowded.

CryptoCred closed with a candid remark: “Hopefully I’m an idiot doomposting the bottom GM.” Whether this cycle marks a floor or a permanent structural shift in the crypto market remains the central question.

 

Bitcoin’s April advance appears increasingly fragile from a sector-wide perspective, as a sharp rally driven by futures trading contrasts with cooling spot demand. CryptoQuant’s latest on-chain analysis shows a roughly 20% rise for Bitcoin in April, climbing from around $66,000 to a peak near $79,000, a move the firm attributes largely to growth in perpetual futures activity. At the same time, on-chain data indicate the market’s marginal buyer was more speculative than fundamental, a dynamic that raises questions about sustainability beyond the current cycle.

As of this writing, Bitcoin was hovering around $77,000, up about 2% on the prior 24 hours. CryptoQuant noted that the April price surge diverged from underlying spot demand, signaling that the momentum may not be supported by long-term buyers or real user adoption. In its assessment, the firm described the divergence between rising prices and contracting spot demand as one of the clearest on-chain signals that current gains are driven by speculative activity rather than a structural shift in demand fundamentals.

Key takeaways

• April’s roughly 20% Bitcoin rally was led by perpetual futures demand, with spot buying cooling during the move.
• The price surge coincided with a backdrop of contracting spot demand, signaling a speculative-driven rally rather than a broad-based fundamentals-led move.
• CryptoQuant warned that the divergence between price and on-chain demand has historically preceded further downside in Bitcoin’s price within bear-market regimes.
• CryptoQuant’s Bull Score Index slid to 40 in April, suggesting growing bearish sentiment despite the price uptick.

Futures-led momentum and the spot-demand paradox

The CryptoQuant report emphasizes a notable shift in market mechanics during April. While Bitcoin advanced toward the high 70s, on-chain activity that would indicate sustained interest from real-world buyers—such as steady spot purchases or rising exchange balances held by long-term holders—remained muted. The firm framed this as a classic indicator of speculative leverage: price gains propelled by futures demand, not by a broadened base of physical demand or treasury accumulation.

Such dynamics are not isolated incidents. The data point to a broader pattern in which a futures-dominated rally can inflate prices temporarily while underlying demand remains fragile. This distinction matters for traders and holders who weigh whether a rally represents a durable shift in the market’s risk-reward or a tactical move that could reverse under tightening liquidity or shifting sentiment.

Comparative context: past cycles and risk signals

CryptoQuant highlighted a historical resonance with the early phase of the 2022 bear market, when futures-driven strength outpaced the spot market before a sustained price decline took hold. In that frame, a rally built on speculative demand without corresponding fundamentals can intensify downside pressure once speculative incentives swing the other way or market liquidity tightens.

That risk assessment sits alongside other macro and market signals. Bitcoin’s current trajectory—price resilience paired with weakening on-chain fundamentals—creates a mixed backdrop for market participants. CryptoQuant stressed that the pattern observed in April remains a reminder of the bear-market regime’s potential to reassert itself, even as short-term momentum persists.

Dueling narratives on the drivers of the rally

The April move has drawn attention to differing interpretations of what’s fueling Bitcoin’s resilience. On one side, CryptoQuant’s analysis underscores the preponderance of futures-driven activity, warning that the rally may not reflect a durable shift in demand fundamentals. On the other side, commentary from market participants has highlighted substantial demand from other quarters. For instance, Bitwise’s chief investment officer Matt Hougan argued that bitcoin-related strategic purchases, including actions by an entity described as Strategy, have been a central driver of the recent rally. He pointed to strong ETF demand and renewed interest from long-term holders as reinforcing factors, while singling out Strategy as a particularly significant contributor to the rally’s momentum.

Both perspectives point to a broader theme: multiple drivers of price action can coexist, and disentangling them is essential for assessing whether the rally will endure. If futures-driven demand remains the dominant force, the market could face heightened volatility and potential downside if those funds retreat or if spot buyers do not step in to take their place.

Market sentiment and what to watch next

CryptoQuant’s Bulls Score, an index that combines market and network signals to gauge sentiment, dipped from 50 to 40 in April. The decline suggests a softening near-term outlook despite price gains, aligning with the idea that the market may be approaching a more cautious phase. The combination of price strength with weakening sentiment and spot demand has prompted observers to wonder whether the rally can translate into a more durable uptrend or if it will unwind as speculative liquidity tightens.

For investors, several questions loom: Will spot buyers eventually re-enter with conviction, supported by macro catalysts or institutional inflows? Or will futures-driven momentum fade, leaving prices to correct as speculative positions unwind? The answer may hinge on how other demand channels—such as ETFs, long-term Treasury-like holdings, and emerging institutional interest—respond in the coming weeks and months.

Closing perspective

As Bitcoin navigates a marketplace characterized by mixed signals, the split between price momentum and fundamental demand remains a critical watchpoint. The April episode reinforces a broader lesson for investors and builders: price action can diverge from on-chain health for extended periods, but sustained upside typically requires a genuine uptick in durable demand. Readers should monitor how spot demand evolves, how institutional and ETF-driven flows develop, and whether sentiment indices indicate a meaningful shift toward risk appetite or a cautiousism that could cap near-term gains.

EUR/USD started a fresh increase above 1.1700 and 1.1720. USD/CHF declined further and is now struggling below 0.7835.

Important Takeaways for EUR/USD and USD/CHF Analysis Today

· The Euro started a decent increase from 1.1650 against the US Dollar.

· There was a break above a bearish trend line with resistance at 1.1685 on the hourly chart of EUR/USD at FXOpen.

· USD/CHF declined below the 0.7865 and 0.7850 support levels.

· There was a break below a bullish trend line with support at 0.7910 on the hourly chart at FXOpen.

EUR/USD Technical Analysis

On the hourly chart of EUR/USD at FXOpen, the pair started a fresh increase from the 1.1650 zone. The Euro cleared the 1.1700 barrier to move into a bullish zone against the US Dollar.

There was a break above a bearish trend line with resistance at 1.1685. The bulls pushed the pair above the 50-hour simple moving average and 1.1720. Finally, the pair cleared 1.1735. A high was formed near 1.1740 and the pair is now consolidating gains.

An Immediate bid zone on the downside is near the 23.6% Fib retracement level of the upward wave from the 1.1655 swing low to the 1.1740 high at 1.1720.

The next area of interest could be near 1.1700, the 50% Fib retracement level, and the 50-hour simple moving average. A downside break below 1.1700 might send the pair toward 1.1675. Any more losses might send the pair into a bearish zone toward 1.1650.

If there is a fresh increase, an immediate hurdle on the EUR/USD chart is 1.1750. The first major pivot level for the bulls could be 1.1755. An upside break above 1.1755 might send the pair to 1.1800. The next selling zone could be 1.1850. Any more gains might open the doors for a move toward 1.1920.

USD/CHF Technical Analysis

On the hourly chart of USD/CHF at FXOpen, the pair started a fresh decline from well above 0.7900. The US Dollar dropped below 0.7880 to move into a negative zone against the Swiss Franc.

There was a break below a bullish trend line with support at 0.7910. The bears pushed the pair below the 50-hour simple moving average and 0.7850. Finally, the bulls appeared near 0.7800. A low was formed near 0.7805, and the pair is now consolidating losses.

On the upside, the pair could face bears near the 23.6% Fib retracement level of the downward move from the 0.7925 swing high to the 0.7805 low at 0.7835.

The first major resistance sits near the 50% Fib retracement level at 0.7865. The main barrier for an upside break could be near the 50-hour simple moving average at 0.7880. A daily close above 0.7880 could start a fresh increase. In the stated case, the pair could rise toward 0.7925. The next stop for the bulls might be 0.7965.

On the downside, immediate support on the USD/CHF chart is 0.7805. The first major breakdown zone could be 0.7780. A close below 0.7780 might send the pair to 0.7750. Any more losses may possibly open the doors for a move toward 0.7700 in the coming days.

Trade over 50 forex markets 24 hours a day with FXOpen. Take advantage of low commissions, deep liquidity, and spreads from 0.0 pips (additional fees may apply). Open your FXOpen account now or learn more about trading forex with FXOpen.

This article represents the opinion of the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand only. It is not to be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation with respect to products and services provided by the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand, nor is it to be considered financial advice.