Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Politics

Politics Home | Train Teachers To Identify Antisemitism In Classrooms, Says Independent Advisor

Published

on

Train Teachers To Identify Antisemitism In Classrooms, Says Independent Advisor
Train Teachers To Identify Antisemitism In Classrooms, Says Independent Advisor

The government’s antisemitism Lord John Mann told PoliticsHome all school teachers should have “basic” antisemitism training. (Alamy)


5 min read

The government’s independent advisor on antisemitism has called for teachers to be given basic training in how to identify antisemitism in classrooms, telling PoliticsHome that there must be a stronger state effort to tackle rising hate against Britain’s Jews.

Advertisement

Lord John Mann, a former Labour MP who has advised ministers on antisemitism since 2019, said he was not “satisfied” with how successive governments have responded to rising levels of antisemitism in the UK, saying “everyone needs to up their game”.

Mann spoke to PoliticsHome after two Jewish people were stabbed in a terrorist attack in Golders Green, north London, on Wednesday. The Met Police announced on Friday morning that Essa Suleima, 45, had been charged in connection with the attack.

There have also been arson attacks in the wider borough of Barnet, home to the UK’s largest Jewish community, in recent months, including the firebombing of ambulances run by a Jewish charity and several synagogues, and a lethal attack on a synagogue in Manchester last year. 

Advertisement

Following the terrorist attack on Wednesday, the government has announced an additional £25m for community policing to protect Jewish communities and pledged to fast-track legislation banning state-linked terror groups.

In a press conference on Thursday, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said ministers were looking at “further measures we can take on protests”, amid calls for tougher action against antisemitism at pro-Palestine marches. Starmer said the phrase “globalise the intifada” was an example of “extreme racism” which should result in police prosecution.

Speaking to PoliticsHome, Mann said there should be a greater police presence in Barnet permanently, as well as more government funding for security measures to protect Jews across the country, like CCTV and alarm systems in shops.

Advertisement

But he stressed that tackling antisemitism must go further than greater security, calling for every secondary school teacher nationwide to be “taught the basics” of identifying it: “about how to recognise antisemitism, and how to deal with it in the classroom”.

“Very basic level training, nothing particularly expensive or fancy, a basic level for every secondary school teacher, starting with the new teachers. I think that is doable, and that it needs to happen. And I’m impatient on that happening,” the peer said.

He continued: “If a Jewish child at school, or a Jewish staff member, doesn’t have people at work who understand how to recognise antisemitism, they’re clearly not going to be able to deal with it properly… and the impact on children is far more important than anything…

“I put it to the last government, I put it to this government. It hasn’t happened yet.”

Advertisement

Mann said the recent creation of a cross-departmental group in government focusing on antisemitism was a “really significant” development, but warned that it “would take some time for that to have a real impact”. He added that he expects his report on antisemitism in the health service to be published by Health Secretary Wes Streeting in the coming weeks.

Speaking during a visit to Golders Green on Thursday, the Prime Minister said the government was looking at “what more needs to be done in health and education” to tackle antisemitism. “So there is a lot that is being done. Of course, we need to do everything we can,” he said.

Starmer visits Golders Green
Keir Starmer,visits Hatzola to meet members of the Jewish volunteer medical service and security group Shomrim, following yesterdays terrorist attack in Golders Green (Alamy)

However, Mann argued that the UK does not yet have a “comprehensive approach” to dealing with antisemitism, after charity Community Support Trust said in February that 2025 saw the second-highest annual number of anti-Jewish hate incidents on record.

“We don’t have a comprehensive approach, in my opinion, to extremism. What it is, how it manifests,” he said.

“The growth of Islamist extremism has been pronounced and is very dangerous, and we’re not on top of that. We have left-wing extremism and right-wing extremism to contend with… both have grown. Older problems and newer problems all converged together.”

Advertisement

Last month, the cross-party Home Affairs Committee concluded that Prevent, the government’s anti-terrorism programme, is “outdated and inadequately prepared”. 

Committee chair Conservative MP Karen Bradley said Prevent “has the clear and explicit function of stopping people becoming radicalised into terrorism, but more and more it is having to support those with no ideological motivation, who may have complex needs and operate in digital spaces that are poorly understood”.

“There needs to be a comprehensive structure in place at a local level, but implemented nationwide, that triages referrals to where they can receive the right support.”

Mann believes that “very big numbers” of Jews will start to leave the UK “very quickly” if things do not change, telling PoliticsHome that “the freedom to be Jewish in this country has been significantly impaired”. 

Advertisement

“That’s unacceptable, because people aren’t doing that willingly,” said Lord Mann.

“They’re doing it under duress.”

The independent adviser compared what he believes could happen in the UK in the coming months to what happened in France following rising levels of antisemitism in the 2010s, culminating in a lethal attack on a Jewish supermarket in Paris in 2015, when, according to the World Jewish Congress, around 8,000 Jews left the country.

“I would define the breaking point as when a significant number of people start to move,” he said.

Advertisement

 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Axe Drax activists hunt down Drax executives after they dodged AGM

Published

on

Axe Drax activists hold a banner saying Drax Is Toxic

Axe Drax activists hold a banner saying Drax Is Toxic

At 9am on 30 April, over 20 activists from Axe Drax hunted down Drax’s executives to their central London office after they refused to turn up to their own AGM.

The activists vaulted the building’s barriers and stormed the third floor offices, unfurling banners reading ‘Drax Kills’, ‘Drax is Toxic’ and ‘Go Breathe Poison, Willard’ in reference to Drax’s pollution of communities in the Southern US and the Drax CEO Willard Gardiner.

After activists had occupied the offices for an hour, security forcibly dragged them out one at a time. Activists heard an office worker saying “you know I don’t believe in climate change”. And the building manager said “if you let another person in you’re sacked” to security during the commotion. At 11am, two more activists entered the building letting off portable alarms attached to “retirement” helium balloons.

The Axe Drax action follows the revelation Drax received £999m in subsidy and the announcement by board members that they wouldn’t attend their AGM in person this year. This is after they closed their AGM early last year following interventions from activists. Drax cited “security concerns”, but this has been met with widespread condemnation as a move to simply avoid mounting criticism across sectors.

Advertisement

This action is one of many to happen around Drax’s AGM, including a demonstration outside the building where Drax’s shareholders are gathering by the Stop Burning Trees Coalition and the Climate Choir Movement with a planned day of tuneful protest.

Rosie Gloster, from pressure group Axe Drax, said:

Drax is falling apart as a company, facing numerous lawsuits, investigations by the FCA and rapidly falling profits despite the almost £1bn received in subsidies last year that we all footed the bill for.

It’s utterly pathetic that Drax thinks they can hide from the public and community members like this; we can all see through their dirty lies. We want to make one thing clear: whatever Drax does, we will not let them hide from the death and destruction they’re spreading around the world.

Sam Simmons, also from Axe Drax, said:

Advertisement

As much as Drax tries, they will never be able to hide from the fact they’re poisoning communities, destroying vital forests and ripping off billpayers here in the UK. If Drax wants to try and hide from the public, we will come to them.

Our money is footing the bill for their multi-million pay packets, we’re being forced into funding the poisoning of working-class, Black communities in the US – we will not let Drax hide behind a screen for as long as they continue their deadly business.

Featured image via Axe Drax

By The Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

DWP brags about autism training whilst trying to prove autism is overdiagnosed

Published

on

DWP hails autism training, while slashing vital benefits

DWP hails autism training, while slashing vital benefits

The Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) is bragging about staff completing autism awareness training. This comes right when they’re trying to prove neurodivergent conditions are overdiagnosed.

The department put out a self-congratulatory press release reporting that about 4,000 DWP healthcare professionals had completed “part of” the Oliver McGowan Trust’s autism and learning disability training.

Yes, you read that right, part of. In theory, this could be as little as an introductory session. But the DWP aren’t ashamed to celebrate the bare minimum.

DWP patting themselves on back for bare minimum

The press release explains:

Advertisement

The training tackles “diagnostic overshadowing” – where symptoms are wrongly attributed to a person’s disability rather than investigated properly – ensuring people receive the right support at the right time.

Which sounds great, but this is the DWP we’re talking about. But how much of this will be used to punish disabled people?

The release also says the training is intended to give staff the tools to make “meaningful reasonable adjustments” as they navigate the fucking cruel benefits system 

These include:

  • More time in assessments, reducing anxiety and allowing people to communicate clearly and confidently.
  • Simpler, clearer communications from Jobcentres, making information accessible to people who may find complex language difficult to process.
  • Sensory-aware Jobcentre environments, ensuring spaces feel safe and manageable for people who may find busy or loud environments overwhelming.

Again, nice promises, but in a system that feels like it’s built to catch you out, it’s going to take a lot of convincing. This is already a department that gets a horrific amount of complaints. The number of complaints from Universal Credit claimants rose by 43% last year. This happened despite there only being a 12% increase in claims.

In its press release, the DWP also had the fucking audacity to say:

Advertisement

The accomplishment is a clear demonstration of the government’s commitment to putting disabled people at the heart of everything it does.

To back this up, the department once again brags about the Independent Disability Advisory Panel. As the Canary has extensively covered, this is a complete farce. It only includes 10 whole disabled people with mere hours to pore over reams of policy. In fact, that’s if they’re allowed to do anything meaningful at all.

The government also had to backtrack on the IDAP before it even launched. This is because they tried to insist participants sign NDAs. The panel also sparked fury as only one of them is from the north of England.

DWP can never be trusted

There’s also the glaring elephant in the room — the DWP bragging about this minimum training whilst doing everything in their power to strip autistic people and those with other neurodivergent conditions of their vital benefits.

The DWP is currently in the process of reforming PIP with its bullshit Timms review. One of the main things the disability benefits cuts protests stopped last year was limiting eligibility. This was especially true for those with neurodivergent conditions.

Advertisement

At the same time, the Department of Health and Social Care is undertaking a review into whether neurodivergent conditions are overdiagnosed. It predictably isn’t going well for them. Not only did 132 experts come out to disprove them. But their own interim report did exactly the same.

This is coupled with the constant noise from the shit rags and think tanks about how people are faking it for benefits or ‘gaming the system’. Just this week, warmonger Tony Blair piped up to propose that neurodivergent conditions should be recategorised as ‘non-work-limiting conditions’ and not eligible for benefits.

Personally, I think war criminals shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near welfare, but that’s just me.

At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter how much the DWP pretends to care about autistic people. Until they stop attacking neurodivergent people and trying to prove they’re all faking, their “training” is hubristic bullshit — meaningless to disabled people.

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

By Rachel Charlton-Dailey

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Trump Rages At ‘Seditious’ New York Times In Unhinged Oval Office Rant

Published

on

Trump Rages At 'Seditious' New York Times In Unhinged Oval Office Rant

President Donald Trump went on a lengthy tirade against The New York Times on Thursday, accusing the newspaper of being “seditious” after its editorial board published a piece titled “The US Military Was Losing Its Edge. After Iran, Everyone Knows It.

During his rant, Trump continued to insist that Iranian forces had been “militarily decapitated” before accusing both the Times and CNN of reporting that Iran was winning the war.

“…And yet I read in The New York Times, I see it on that stupid CNN, which I only watch because you have to watch a little bit of the enemy,” Trump said. “So I watch it for a very short period. But you have to, you know, you have to be smart. And if you see CNN, you’d think they’re winning the war. If you read The New York Times, it’s actually seditious in my opinion. You read The New York Times, you actually think they’re winning the war.”

It’s unclear which specific CNN report the president was referencing. As for the Times piece, it, among other things, argued that Iran’s control of the Strait of Hormuz was the linchpin in the conflict thus far, and that the United States’ trillion-dollar military was “ineffective against cheaper, mass-produced weapons,” such as Iran’s vast drone supply.

Advertisement

“But the problem is bigger than any single commander-in-chief. The United States has left itself unprepared for modern war,” the Times wrote.

What the NYT didn’t do in its article was “conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States,” which is how seditious conspiracy is defined under 18 U.S. Code § 2384.

The last people convicted of seditious conspiracy in the US were leaders of the far-right Proud Boys and Oath Keepers, who stormed the Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection. Trump pardoned all those convicted in connection with the insurrection on his first day back in office.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump Says He Will Remove Tariffs On UK Whisky After King’s Visit

Published

on

Trump Says He Will Remove Tariffs On UK Whisky After King's Visit

Donald Trump has claimed to remove tariffs on Scottish whisky in honour of King Charles and Queen Camilla after their state visit.

The US president announced on TruthSocial on Thursday evening that this decision would help boost industry in Scotland and Kentucky.

The UK government has since confirmed this applies to all whisky tariffs including those on Irish whiskey.

Trump, known for being an ardent royalist, added in his post: “The King and Queen got me to do something that nobody else was able to do, without hardly even asking! A wonderful Honor to have them both in the U.S.A.”

Advertisement

His announcement came after the monarch and his wife visited the White House this week.

Buckingham Palace said the King sent his “sincere gratitude” to Trump and “will be raising a dram to the President’s thoughtfulness”.

The president said he would be removing tariffs and restrictions related to “Scotland’s ability to work with the Commonwealth of Kentucky on Whiskey and Bourbon, two very important industries within Scotland and Kentucky”.

The two areas are linked through the use of wooden barrels to age the alcohol.

Advertisement

Trump, who declared sweeping tariffs on international allies in April 2025, has often used alcohol to apply pressure to other countries.

He threatened a 200% tariff on European wine last year, though it was never realised.

Business and trade secretary Peter Kyle welcomed the announcement, saying: “This is great news for our scotch whisky industry, which is worth almost £1bn in exports and supports thousands of jobs across the UK.”

The state visit from the royals came amid rising tensions between the UK and the US governments after Keir Starmer refused to join in America’s offensive on Iran at the end of February.

Advertisement

Trump has repeatedly lashed out at the prime minister in the months since, saying the Labour leader was “not Winston Churchill”.

But in the run-up to the royal visit, the president suggested Charles’s visit could help to repair the fractured “special relationship”.

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Eurovision 2026: Angela Scanlon And Rylan Clark To Front Semi-Finals

Published

on

Angela Scanlon

The BBC has announced its new Eurovision presenting team following the much-publicised departure of Scott Mills.

Prior to his abrupt firing from the broadcaster in March, Mills had been a key part of the BBC’s Eurovision Song Contest coverage for many years, most notably commentating on the semi-finals every year alongside Rylan Clark.

In his absence, Rylan will now be sharing his thoughts on the Eurovision semis alongside Angela Scanlon later this month.

Angela enthused: “It feels like joining the greatest party on earth – equal parts thrilling and terrifying!

Advertisement

“I grew up watching the Eurovision Song Contest with my three sisters, making very serious (and wildly biased) scorecards from the couch, so to now be part of it – especially in its 70th year – is genuinely surreal. It’s one of those shows that’s always been there, evolving but never losing its magic or madness.”

She added: “I’ve been lucky enough to dip my toe into the Eurovision world before, so it feels great to be doing it again, just with higher heels and a few more sequins!”

Notably, both Scanlon and Clark are among the stars reported to have made the BBC’s shortlist to become the next hosts of Strictly Come Dancing, so their new partnership has got us wondering if we could see them back together on our screens later this year.

Angela Scanlon

Meanwhile, Mills’ breakfast show successor Sara Cox will also be covering the semi-finals on her own for Radio 2, and she’ll also commentate on the final for the station alongside Clark.

As usual, Graham Norton will be on commentating duties on the main broadcast of the live final on BBC One when it airs in mid-May.

Advertisement

Eurovision has been the subject of backlash in recent years due to the continued presence of Israel, despite the ongoing conflict in the Middle East.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Olivia Rodrigo Says New Songs Were Inspired By Sex And The City

Published

on

Cynthia Nixon and David Eigenberg pictured on the set of Sex And The City in 2003

It’s well-documented that the relationship between Gen Z and Sex And The City is a complicated one, but if anyone can serve as an ambassador between the two, it’s Olivia Rodrigo.

The three-time Grammy winner is currently gearing up for the release of her third album You Seem Pretty Sad For A Girl So In Love.

On Thursday night, she made an appearance on The Tonight Show, where she revealed to host Jimmy Fallon that she found inspiration in unusual places on her next release.

She explained that her new material is more “about romantic love in more of a positive sense” after the “heartbroken and angsty” double whammy of Sour and Guts, teasing “love songs” mixed with “melancholy” and “injected with a little bit of sadness and longing”.

Advertisement

In particular, Olivia admitted that “multiple songs” on You Seem Pretty Sad For A Girl So In Love were inspired by the complicated relationship between Cynthia Nixon’s Miranda and David Eigenberg’s Steve on the original run of Sex And The City.

Cynthia Nixon and David Eigenberg pictured on the set of Sex And The City in 2003
Cynthia Nixon and David Eigenberg pictured on the set of Sex And The City in 2003

She beamed: “It’s my favourite show – I think I watched every single episode maybe three times.”

OK, we’re going to need a full breakdown of Olivia’s thoughts on Miranda and Che’s And Just Like That tryst ASAP…

Last month, Olivia unveiled her new song Drop Dead as the lead single from her next album, which quickly shot to the top of the charts on both sides of the Atlantic, giving the Good 4 U singer her fourth UK number one in five years.

Advertisement

You Seem Pretty Sad For A Girl So In Love will be released on 12 June, ahead of her newly-announced Unravelled world tour.

The Unravelled tour will kicks off across the pond in September, before she brings it to the UK with four performances at London’s O2 Arena scheduled for April 2027.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Marco Rubios Rejects Fears US May Back Argentina In Falklands Row

Published

on

Marco Rubios Rejects Fears US May Back Argentina In Falklands Row

Marco Rubio has downplayed fears the US could back Argentina’s claim to the Falklands Islands.

It comes after a Pentagon memo leaked last week suggested the States might look to punish allies who have not supported its war against Iran.

But the secretary of state told The Telegraph: “It was just an email. People are getting overexcited by an email.

“It was just an email with some ideas.”

Advertisement

The newspaper suggests the memo may have been drafted by a junior staffer.

Foreign secretary Yvette Cooper reportedly raised concerns over the memo during a meeting with the top American diplomat on Wednesday, in Washington.

It remains unclear if King Charles also mentioned the topic during his state visit to the White House with Donald Trump.

Argentina has long argued that the archipelago, known to Argentinians as “Las Malvinas”, is their sovereign land.

Advertisement

The memo sparked widespread outrage, with Keir Starmer’s spokesperson saying he could “not be clearer” that the islands are a sovereign British overseas territory.

“Sovereignty rests with the UK, and the islands’ right to self-determination is paramount,” the representative said.

Cooper also reacted on social media, writing: “The Falkland Islands are British – sovereignty rests with the UK, self-determination rests with the islanders.”

The archipelago’s government said 99.8% of voters on the island had cast their ballot in favour of staying a British overseas territory in the 2013 referendum.

Advertisement

In a statement, it said: “The Falkland Islands has complete confidence in the commitment made by the UK government to uphold and defend our right of self-determination.”

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

So Golders Green attack not terrorism, but Starmer still raised ‘terror alert’

Published

on

Golders Green suspect charged with attempted murder

Golders Green suspect charged with attempted murder

The Golders Green attacker Essa Suleiman has been charged with attempted murder and not terrorism.

Rightly so, since Suleiman had been discharged from a mental health unit just before the attack.

The discharge of a man clearly still struggling with ill health, speaks volumes about Labour’s attrition of the NHS. Many hospital trusts have been forced to fill doctor positions with non-doctors, such as the Maudsley trust.

Was earlier attack on police and their dog ‘antisemitic’?

Further research shows that Suleiman is also being charged with attempted murder for an attack in Southwark earlier the same day. The area is not predominantly Jewish. This very detail is, somehow, absent from BBC and other mainstream media headlines, even if you tailor your Boolean search.

Suleiman appears to have a record of knife attacks. This includes stabbing two police officers and a dog almost twenty years ago:

Despite this, Keir Starmer’s functionaries have raised the ‘terror threat’ level to severe. His home secretary Shabana Mahmood has — of course — used this as cover to claim that anti-genocide marches are “stirring up hate against Jews.”

Mahmood also plans to tighten Starmer’s already anti-democratic, anti-human rights protest laws. Apparently too many people are opposing Israel’s crimes too often – and she lied that the protests include hate crimes:

In fact, the only violence and hate at anti-genocide marches is perpetrated either by police, or by pro-Israel counter-demonstrators.

‘Surprisingly’, the government didn’t take the opportunity to crack down on Islamophobia or Zionist racism — or to raise the terror alert. Neither did the January 2026 stabbing — to death — of a Muslim man during Ramadan. Nor did the racist rape of women whose attackers thought they were Muslims, which barely made the front pages.

Keir Starmer has no interest in even speaking out against the terrorism of the Israeli apartheid colony. He will however exploit any excuse to further his war on British people’s rights to protest Israeli war crimes.

Advertisement

The Golders Green attack was certainly violent, as was the police’s response, but it was no act of antisemitism or terrorism — as the charges today confirm.

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nazi salutes thrown by Reform supporters at Polanski’s Hastings rally

Published

on

Polanski Hastings

Polanski Hastings

According to the grassroots community organisation — Hastings and Bexhill Stand Up to Racism (SUTR) — a small group of Reform supporters rocked up to a Green Party rally led by Zack Polanski on 30 April in Hastings to stir trouble. One of them performed three Nazi salutes while others did nothing to stop him.

The  SUTR branch said that Reform has repeatedly shown who they are and that people should believe them.

Hastings Green Party posted a picture of Polanski saying:

Zack smashed it despite a very small number of shouty Reform voters. Proud of our town

Right-wing media’s silence on the incident with Polanski

Britain’s hostile right-wing press, which went after Polanski when he was the target of Nazi salutes, is silent when it comes to this blatant expression of antisemitism by Reform fanboys.

Advertisement

Right-wing TalkTV host, Julia Hartley-Brewer and Telegraph columnist, Jake Wallis-Simons had nothing to say. Both incendiary media personalities claim to champion the rights of Jewish people and have repeatedly used their platform to denounce antisemitism — why the silence now — or is such reporting a quid-pro-quo arrangement.

Their silence, when it concerns Zack Polanksi is deafening, exposing a clear double standard which we’ve repeatedly reported on at the Canary.

As we head into local elections where the Green Party could gain as many as 555, Polanski’s rise threatens the two-party duopoly responsible for corporate state capture, austerity, warmongering, and neoliberal policies punishing the most vulnerable in society. Might this explain MSM’s silence?

If the tables were turned and a Green Party supporter had performed a Nazi salute, it would be headline news.

The same commentators would have elevated their voices and harnessed their platforms to condemn the act. This of course doesn’t apply to the Greens.

Advertisement

This silence sends a clear message. Reform Nazi thugs can “carry on” so long as it serves to punish the Greens and Zack Polanski.

Featured image via the Canary

By The Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Wales Party Leader Criticises Polanski Over Golders Green Row

Published

on

Wales Party Leader Criticises Polanski Over Golders Green Row

Zack Polanski has been chided by the Green Party’s leader in Wales after he caused a row by sharing a tweet about the Golders Green terror attack.

Shilome Rand, 34, and Moshe Shine, 76, were left seriously injured in what police have described as a terrorist incident in Golders Green, north west London, on Wednesday.

Polanski, who is the Green Party leader in England and Wales, retweeted a post on X on Thursday questioning the way in which officers responded to the suspect.

The post read: “So essentially [Met commissioner Mark Rowley’s] officers were repeatedly and violently kicking a mentally ill man in the head when he was already incapacitated by taser.”

Advertisement

Polanski, who is himself Jewish, was then criticised by Labour MPs and the head of the Metropolitan Police, commissioner Sir Mark Rowley, for his “inaccurate and misinformed commentary”.

Asked to respond to the row, the Greens’ leader in Wales Anthony Slaughter said Polanski’s retweet was “inappropriate”.

Speaking to LBC, Slaughter said: “I was made aware of this on the way here, just shortly beforehand. I haven’t seen the tweet. I understand, as you say, Zack retweeted a tweet that it does seem, from what I’ve read, was inappropriate to retweet.

“I know that Zack and his other colleagues in the London Assembly do work closely with the Met Police, so there will be discussions afterwards to see what went wrong and how this can be better handled in future”.

Advertisement

Responding to Rowley’s letter, a Green Party spokesman said: “Zack has seen the video like everyone else, and doesn’t know the full picture and knows it was a very difficult situation for the authorities, but we do need to understand more about the response.”

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025