Asking for the tag to be removed, the solicitor said as the weather improved Taggart wanted to wear shorts and take his child swimming and to sports grounds
A Belfast man facing domestic abuse offences had a bid to remove two of his bail conditions refused today.
A solicitor acting on behalf of 28-year old James Taggart said a request to remove an electronic tag was to enable his client to wear shorts and take his son swimming and to sports grounds in the summer.
The bid to remove the tag was refused, as was a request to remove a 10pm to 5am curfew, at Belfast Crown Court.
From Cu Chulainn House on Victoria Parade, Taggart is facing eight domestic-related offences spanning a period from December 1, 2024 to April 27, 2025.
These offences include two counts of non-fatal strangulation, assault occasioning actual bodily harm and criminal damage.
He has not yet been arraigned on the charges due to the current withdrawal of services by criminal barristers in a dispute over Legal Aid but his solicitor told Judge Philip Gilpin that Taggart was “vehemently contesting” them.
Taggart’s solicitor said his client has been on bail for 13 months and has abided by the conditions imposed with “no hint” of any breaches. The solicitor added that due to the strike it was “unlikely” the case could proceed this year.
Asking for the tag to be removed, the solicitor said as the weather improved Taggart wanted to wear shorts and take his child swimming and to sports grounds.
Saying Taggart not being able to do this was affected his mental health, the solicitor also presented the Judge with a photograph of an injury on his client’s leg whilst wearing the tag.
Opposing the bid to vary Taggart’s bail to remove the two conditions, a Crown barrister said both were deemed necessary to protect the complainant.
The Crown barrister told the Belfast Recorder: “She remains supportive of the prosecution and she has advised the police that it gives her sufficient and significant piece of mind knowing that he has a curfew and a tag that prevents him from attending her house.”
Saying Taggart was “not a man who is a stranger to these courts”, the Crown barrister revealed he has 61 previous convictions which included prior incidents of a domestic nature against the same woman.
Regarding the domestic-related charges currently faced by Taggart which he denies, the Crown barrister said this included an allegation that he attacked her whilst she was driving. The woman also alleges that Taggart regularly grabbed her by the neck, punched her in the face on a number of occasions and tried to attack her with a hoover.
Branding Taggart as a “man with a propensity for violence” and one unable to “contain his impulses”, the Crown barrister said the tag and curfew were “designed to put a curb on those impulses” and should not be removed.
The prosecutor said: “Your Honour will be very, very well aware that unfortunately our courts are overwhelmed with the number domestic violence cases.
“We’re asking, for the protection of the complainant and her children, that Your Honour do not remove what are two very necessary conditions.”
The Crown barrister added: “It’s simply not good enough to say ‘I want to wear shorts so I don’t need a tag anymore.’”
After listening to submissions by both the Crown and defence, Judge Gilpin said he accepted Taggart has been on bail for a “significant period of time” without issue and that if he disputed the charges it would be “some time” before a trial takes place.
Refusing the application to remove the tag and curfew, Judge Gilpin said this was because they restricted Taggart’s movements and offered reassurance to the complainant.
For all the latest news, visit the Belfast Live homepage here and sign up to our daily newsletter here.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login