The Galaxy S26 Ultra is the most complete Android phone I’ve used this year. It doesn’t get there with a single headline feature, though. Instead, it wins the crown by being good at almost everything and then topping it off with its own exclusive set of perks. At $1,300, it’s also undeniably expensive. After four months of using it as my only phone, I don’t think anything else in the Android segment comes close to its breadth. Samsung dropped the titanium frame this time for a lighter, more colorful Armor Aluminum one, and it finally rounded off the corners that used to bite into my palm.
The headline addition is the Privacy Display, baked into the hardware rather than slapped on as a film. It hides the screen from whoever’s sitting next to you. I was skeptical until I used it and got some surprised looks from the people around me. Underneath the glass-and-metal kit sits the customized Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 silicon, which finally pulls level with Apple’s silicon inside iPhones. Whether it’s heavy multitasking, on-device AI through Gemini, or camera capture, all of it ran without a stutter in my time with the phone.
It’s not perfect, though. The battery is still 5,000 mAh, the same as the last few Ultras, and the screen-on time reflects that. It’s respectable, but nothing special. The faster 60W wired charging takes some of the sting out, at least. The cameras get wider apertures and much better low-light results. Futhermore, the Horizon Lock video mode genuinely impressed me, but I still hit the odd exposure wobble and some shutter lag. The bottom line is that the Galaxy S26 Ultra is an unapologetic powerhouse. It won’t drag S25 Ultra owners into an upgrade charm, but for just about everyone else, it’s a masterclass.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra specs: What’s inside this sleek flagship?
Processor
Octa-Core (4.74 GHz, 3.6 GHz)
Display
17.49 cm Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120 x 1440 (Quad HD+), 16M Colour Depth, 120 Hz Max Refresh Rate
5000 mAh (Non-removable), Up to 31 hours video playback time
Audio & Video
Stereo Support, Video Playback Resolution up to UHD 8K (7680 x 4320) @ 60fps
Software Support
Security Updates valid until 28 February 2033
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra design and build: A deceptively sleek behemoth
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Every smartphone label is chasing titanium these days, so Samsung going back to aluminum reads like a step backward on paper. It isn’t. After living with the Armor Aluminum 2 frame, I’m convinced the swap was the right call. For one, aluminum takes anodization far better than the PVD coating titanium needs, which is why the colors here pop the way they do.
You get Cobalt Violet (the one I tested, and the one Samsung wants you to buy as the signature color this year), Sky Blue, White, Black, and two Samsung-exclusive shades, Silver Shadow and Pink Gold. The other reason is heat. Aluminum dissipates it a lot quicker than titanium. I learned that lesson the hard way with the iPhone 16 Pro.
Advertisement
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Paired with the vapor chamber, the aluminum chassis on the Samsung flagship kept the phone from getting toasty under stress, but more on that later. I noticed it most during a marathon evening of editing a trip video on the phone, the kind of workflow that usually leaves a metal phone warm enough to be unpleasant. This one stayed merely warm.
The ergonomics get better. Phew!
Samsung finally fixed my biggest pet peeve about its top-end phones. Those sharp, palm-digging corners are finally gone. The rounded edges on the S26 Ultra are subtle, but it changes how the phone feels in the hand entirely. It feels thinner and easier to manage one-handed, and after a week, I stopped reaching instinctively for a case, which I never did with the last Ultra.
The camera array still juts out about half a centimeter, though, so the phone rocks around on a desk if you tap at it lying flat without a case. That’s the one ergonomic compromise that hasn’t budged in years, and I doubt it’s going to change in the near future due to the ever-upgrading imaging hardware.
Durability and ingress protection
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Up front, you’ll find Corning’s Gorilla Armor 2 layer, which mixes in ceramic for better drop resistance and glare reduction. The back is Gorilla Glass Victus 2. I didn’t deliberately drop the phone, because it isn’t mine to destroy, but it picked up exactly zero micro-scratches over a few months of being tossed into bags alongside keys and a charging brick, which is more than I can say for plenty of phones I’ve tested.
One aspect worth flagging is the durability. The Galaxy S26 Ultra holds its IP68 rating, which means it’s good for accidental dips in 1.5m of water for 30 minutes. It’s not the best out there, by the way. A handful of Chinese rivals are already shipping IP69 and IP69K ratings for high-pressure water resistance, which means they can shrug off hot, pressurized jets, not just a dunk in a sink.
The OnePlus 15 is one of those phones, and it pulls off the durability stunt without compromising the looks. Samsung is being conservative. For most people, IP68 is plenty, and the build still feels rock solid in the hand, but it’s a spec sheet line where Samsung is no longer leading the pack.
Advertisement
The S Pen experience
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
The S Pen lives in the bottom-left corner inside its own silo. It’s a touch thinner this year, with a curved end that sits flush against the new frame. Functionally, however, it hasn’t changed much since Samsung pulled back the Bluetooth tricks. There’s no more air-gesture remote-shutter party trick to enjoy, and it’s worth mourning.
I rarely used it, so I won’t pretend that it’s a huge miss for me. It’s still the best stylus on any phone by a far margin. The latency is effectively zero, and that held up whether I was scribbling notes in a meeting, sketching a rough idea, or nudging a slider in the photo editor where the fine control genuinely matters.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
I love the fact that it can kick into action right from the lock screen, offering you a natural canvas for jotting down notes without having to go through the whole fingerprint scan or password input hassle.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra display: Two steps forward, one step back
The screen on the Galaxy S26 Ultra is a gorgeous 6.9-inch flat Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X panel with QHD+ (3120 x 1440 pixels at 500 ppi) resolution and a refresh rate that ramps from 1Hz all the way to 120Hz. Peak HDR brightness hits 2,600 nits, so I never once squinted at it outdoors.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Plus, there’s an anti-reflective Gorilla Armor 2 coating on top. I spent an afternoon shooting and reviewing photos under a harsh midday sun. Ordinarily, that kind of light turns most smartphone screens into mirrors, especially with the dark mode UI. The Galaxy S26 Ultra did a much better job and stayed legible throughout the exercise.
Let’s talk about that Privacy Display
This is the real story of the S26 Ultra. Forget the cheap stick-on privacy films that dilute the image clarity. Samsung built this in at the sub-pixel level, interlacing normal wide-viewing OLED pixels with narrow-beam pixel arrays. The way it works is straightforward in practice, even if the engineering is clever.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
As you switch it on, the wide pixels shut off, so anyone peering in from more than 45 degrees off-axis sees a murky near-black panel, while you, looking at it straight, see everything as normal. There are a bunch of granular controls, too. You can leave it on all the time, or pin it to specific triggers, so it kicks in automatically for banking apps, WhatsApp, or just incoming notification pop-ups and nothing else.
In day-to-day use, it was the feature I didn’t know I wanted. On a crowded metro train, I caught myself replying to messages I’d normally have left until I got home, because I was no longer worried about the person packed against my shoulder peeking at them. It’s the rare phone feature that actually changed my behavior rather than just sitting in a settings menu.
Advertisement
It’s not all sunshine and rainbows, though
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Privacy Display is a meaningful trick, but Samsung’s choices come with three caveats that I kept noticing. The first is viewing angles. Even with privacy mode off, that interlaced pixel structure leaves the Ultra with slightly narrower natural viewing angles than the cheaper S26 and S26+. You’ll only really see it if you hand the phone to someone and you’re both trying to watch from the side.
The second is contrast. Once you set Privacy Display to Maximum Privacy mode, the brightness output and color contrast take a visible hit. Those signature inky AMOLED blacks start looking a little gray, as a result. It’s a fair loss for the privacy and display convenience, but it is still a trade-off you must learn to live with.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
And finally, despite some confusing early claims, this is an 8-bit display leaning on FRC to fake 10-bit color output. Most people will never catch any banding in normal use, and I had to go looking in test gradients to spot it. But on a $1,300 phone in 2026, an 8-bit panel is going to bother the purists, and they’re not wrong to expect more at this price. There’s also no high-frequency PWM dimming, so if you’re sensitive to OLED flicker, low brightness might tire your eyes over a long evening of reading in the dark.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra camera: Legacy preserved with extra oomph
Alright, let’s discuss the soul of the Galaxy S26 Ultra. The quad-camera layout looks familiar, but the aperture and processing changes here add up to real gains, especially after dark. This is also the section where I spent the most time, because cameras are where flagship phones either justify their price or quietly don’t, and Samsung’s Galaxy S Ultra has always marketed itself as the phone you leave the real camera at home for.
Main (Wide)
200 MP
f/1.4 (up from f/1.7)
1/1.3″
0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
Ultrawide
50 MP
f/1.9
1/2.5″
120˚ FOV, dual pixel PDAF
Telephoto 1 (3x)
10 MP
f/2.4
1/3.94″
67mm equivalent, OIS
Telephoto 2 (5x)
50 MP
f/2.9 (up from f/3.4)
1/2.52″
111mm equivalent, ALoP design, OIS
Front (Selfie)
12 MP
f/2.2
1/3.2″
Wider 23mm FOV, dual pixel PDAF
Let’s start where it counts, because the 200MP main sensor is doing the heavy lifting on this phone, and Samsung has clearly poured its energy into it. The headline change is the jump to an f/1.4 aperture, up from f/1.7 on the S25 Ultra, and that’s not a marketing number you should glide past. A wider aperture pulls in more light, which matters enormously the moment the sun goes down.
I’ll start with the low-light situation. In the image below, you can see what the camera viewfinder shows your eyes, and what the image sensors actually capture in a dark room:
Advertisement
Just look at the sheer level of color details the camera extracted in an utterly dark room.Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
In good daylight, honestly, the gap between this and last year’s Ultra is hard to see, because there’s plenty of light to go around and Samsung’s processing was already excellent. The 200MP sensor pixel-bins down to a default 12MP shot that’s clean, detailed, and well-saturated. If you switch to the full 200MP mode for a static, well-lit scene, the amount of detail you can crop into is genuinely absurd.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
The only trade-off is that the 12MP pixel-binned shots turn out a tad sharper, while the full 200MP clicks are a bit noisy and lose out on finer surface details. Otherwise, with steady hands, the 50MP and 200MP modes can deliver some terrific results. I shot a building facade across a plaza and could pull a legible street sign out of a corner of the frame that I couldn’t even read with my own eyes from where I stood.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Where the f/1.4 lens earns its keep is in the in-between hours. Indoor restaurant lighting, an overcast street at dusk, or a living room lit by a couple of lamps, that’s the territory where last year’s phones started smearing detail and lifting noise, and it’s where the Galaxy S26 Ultra shines. Shadow detail that used to dissolve into mush stays intact, and the phone doesn’t lean as hard on its noise reduction.
Night capture
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Samsung loves the word “Nightography,” and I went in ready to roll my eyes at it. I’ll give credit where it’s due, though, because the f/1.4 main lens combined with the new processing produced the cleanest phone night shots I’ve taken on a phone in years. And yeah, it does a noticeably better job than the iPhone 17 Pro, both in terms of color realism and surface details.
Left: Galaxy S26 Ultra. Right: iPhone 17 ProNadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
City skylines came out cleaner, with the bright points of distant windows staying crisp instead of blooming into colored halos. I took the phone out to shoot a stretch of road lit only by sodium streetlamps, the kind of orange-cast scene that throws off the white balance. The Galaxy S26 Ultra handled it more accurately than I expected, keeping the tarmac a believable gray rather than dunking the whole frame in a warm coat.
Left: Galaxy S26 Ultra. Right: iPhone 17 ProNadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
On a reasonably dark night outside the city, the dedicated astro mode stacked a long exposure and pulled out a genuinely respectable field of stars, with far less of the smeary, watercolor-sky effect these modes used to produce. It’s not replacing a tripod-mounted mirrorless camera and a fast prime anytime soon, and I wouldn’t pretend otherwise, but as a phone you happen to have in your pocket when the sky is clear, it punches well above its weight class.
Zoom, telephoto, and the 5x macro problem
A 5x telephoto click of my cat.Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
The two telephoto lenses are where the Galaxy S26 Ultra’s ambition really shows. The 3x lens is the one I reached for most without thinking, because it sits at the natural portrait length, and it renders faces with flattering compression and minimal distortion. The 5x lens is the showpiece, and Samsung pushed its aperture wider this time around, which again pays off after dark.
When the zoom does a good job.Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
The phone will push out to 100x Space Zoom, and as always, that mode is a party trick more than a useful tool, fine for reading a far-off sign but a mushy, AI-smoothed mess for anything you’d actually want to keep. I tried my best with long-range clicks of pets and nature, and the surface texture turned out pretty hazy and just messed up.
When the zoom does a shoddy job.Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
There is one real catch with the 5x lens, and it’s worth understanding before you buy. To slim the telephoto module down, Samsung went with an ALoP design on the bigger zoom camera. The upside is that you get a gorgeous bokeh effect, the kind of soft background separation that makes portraits truly shine. The downside is that at this range, the phone hunts for focus far more than I’d like.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
If you like shooting tight detail shots, a flower, a watch face, a plate of food, you’ll find the 5x backing away from you, and you’ll end up on the main sensor’s macro mode instead. It’s a quirk, not a dealbreaker, but it vexed me in the early days until I adjusted my instincts. Also, the color chemistry of the macro shots is slightly different, leaning towards a warmer color cast, so that’s worth keeping in mind.
The highs, lows, and the stuff that irked me
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
The front camera lands a wider frame on the Galaxy S26 Ultra, which doesn’t sound like much until you’re squeezing three friends into a frame. Without a selfie stick, that extra bit of width is the difference between everyone fitting and someone losing half their head. Details are good, skin tones are handled well, and the wider field makes it a better travel companion for group shots in front of something you actually want in the background.
You can create a custom filter in the camera app using existing images. It’s lovely.Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
On color accuracy, Samsung has finally reined in its old habit of cranking up the saturation way beyond realism. For years, Samsung’s phones would hand you skies that were a little too blue and grass that looked a tad too green. It was flattering at a glance but not realistic. This year, skin tones and white balance stayed accurate across all kinds of lighting in my shots. It’s a more grown-up and mature look, and I prefer it.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Now, on to the less flattering parts. In tricky high-contrast scenes, exposure sometimes drifted between back-to-back shots, so I’d fire off three frames of the same subject and find one noticeably brighter than the others for no obvious reason. More frustrating is the low-light shutter lag. Below a certain threshold, there’s a real 0.5 to 1.5 second capture delay, and it cost me a couple of shots of a moving subject I’d genuinely have liked to keep.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
The feature I keep showing people, though, is Super Steady Horizon Lock. It leans on the gyroscope and EIS, letting you spin the phone a full 360 degrees while recording, and the horizon just stays put. It’s uncanny. I moved the phone around like a waving soccer fan in my kitchen to test its limits, and the footage came back looking like it was shot on a gimbal. It went meaningfully further than Apple’s Action Mode in my side-by-side comparison. For anyone shooting handheld action, a kid’s football match, a bike ride, or a concert, it’s the kind of perk that turns unusable footage into something you’d actually post.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra performance: Fast and hot
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
The Galaxy S26 Ultra draws power from the customized Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy silicon. It’s based on the 3nm process, tagging alongside fast UFS 4.0 storage and either 12GB or 16GB of LPDDR5X RAM to go with it. There’s a lot of performance headroom here, and in normal use I never came close to running out of it.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Apps snap open, the camera is ready the instant I raise the phone, and I never once watched it stutter while switching between a dozen open apps. Android chips have trailed Apple on raw core performance for years, and the gap was the stick Apple fans loved to beat Android with. The Oryon V3 cores in the Elite Gen 5 close that gap, and it reflects in the Geekbench benchmark scores.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
There’s a bigger vapor chamber in here this time, and the phone never got uncomfortably hot while I used it. Games such as Zenless Zone Zero and Diablo Immortal worked without any stutters. The trade-off is how it gets to the performance summit. As I pushed it hard with titles like Genshin Impact, the throttling became visible with lowered FPS output, all done to keep the surface cool.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
You can see it in the numbers. The phone posts a chart-topping tally on the demanding 3DMark tests, and then drops aggressively down to nearly half its peak performance after a sustained 20-minute run. Even throttled, that ties the iPhone’s sustained score and leaves the Pixel 10 Pro XL far behind.
Running the CPU throttle test, the phone fared even worse in terms of sustained performance drop. I have seen devices like the Red Magic 11 Pro fare much better. In practice, that means a long gaming session gets a little less smooth after the first twenty minutes, but never to the point where it becomes annoying or drops too many frames to ruin the experience.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra software: Loaded with AI
The Galaxy S26 Ultra ships running Android 16 with One UI 8.5 layer on top. Notably, Samsung is matching Google’s seven years of major OS and security updates promises, which carry the phone through to 2033. That’s a long tail of support, and it’s a huge reassurance if you’re a person who sticks with their phone until it falls apart.
Before we dig into the AI side of the debate, One UI itself isn’t bad. Far from it. DeX is still one of the best implementations of a desktop-like work environment bundled with an Android phone. Moreover, Good Lock offers the deepest level of customization on a smartphone without having to flash a ROM or install sketchy apps. The design is familiar, but after seeing the same familiar UI for years, it could use some jazzing up at this point in time.
The AI ecosystem
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
There are a lot of AI engines stacked on top of each other here. It can feel like too much at first, and there’s a real argument that Samsung has thrown everything at the wall to see what sticks. Once you figure out where everything lives, though, you can get some genuine utility out of it. The most interesting piece is agentic AI through Gemini. It doesn’t just answer you. Instead, it can go act inside third-party apps, ordering your usual off DoorDash or booking an airport Uber.
It’s still a beta experience, and it shows. It’s slow, and you often have to sit and watch it tap through the app before it hands you a final confirm button, which rather defeats the point of automation. Still, you can see where this is all going, and it’s the first time I’ve used a phone feature that felt like a preview of the next few years rather than a gimmick of this one.
Advertisement
Bixby, meanwhile, isn’t just an alarm-setter anymore. Samsung wired in Perplexity, so it can field genuinely complex real-time questions and cite where the answers came from, which makes it actually trustworthy in a way Bixby never has been.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
The Photo Assist and Creative Studio tools let you tweak a photo, recolor a shirt, or sketch something rough with the S Pen and have the AI turn it into a watercolor, a 3D render, or an oil painting. They’re fun, occasionally useful, and exactly the sort of thing you’ll show someone once and then forget about. But they also tend to misfire, as you can see in the sample images below.
The misfires
Using AI to move around objects can produce funny results.Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Samsung is pushing the Galaxy S26 Ultra as an AI-native phone, and as such, it has crammed it into nearly every corner of the software experience, but not all of it works. Now Brief stacks weather, calendar, and news into a lock-screen widget, but I never got more out of it than the widgets we’ve already had for a decade.
I asked the AI to remove humans. It did a good job, but even removed a vehicle, or two.Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Now Nudge is supposed to read what’s on your screen and react, spotting a text about dinner and offering a Maps link, among other such helpful cues. In my testing, it almost never fired when I actually wanted it, and when it did, the suggestion was usually something I’d already thought of.
Now Brief in action.Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
There’s one smart privacy touch worth a mention, and that’s local AI processing. If you don’t want any of your personal data to go to the cloud, you can enable it to handle AI tasks on-device. You lose some of the heavier generative features, of course, but your data stays put and I appreciate that Samsung made it prominently accessible rather than burying the choice.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra battery life and charging: Stagnant, but reliable
Capacity and screen-on time
If there’s one soft spot on the Galaxy S26 Ultra’s stacked specs sheet, it’s the battery. Samsung has maximized the peak capacity at 5,000 mAh for yet another year. Rivals are out there are shipping silicon-carbon cells up to 8,000 mAh as the mainstream now, while Samsung sits tight. I understand the caution, but a competitor managing 40% more capacity in a similar footprint makes the decision a tad harder to defend.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
The 3nm chip and LTPO panel are efficient enough that battery life doesn’t tank midway through a day. It’s just not the class leader anymore. On a heavy day of 5G, gaming, and GPS usage, I averaged 5 to 6 hours of screen-on time, which meant charging every night without fail. On more moderate days, I landed closer to eight hours of screen-on time in standard testing, which is solid. The number that stings is the video streaming rundown. Simply put, if endurance is your single most important spec, the Ultra is no longer the phone to beat.
Charging speeds and MagSafe omissions
To make up for a stagnant battery capacity situation, charging got a lot quicker, and this is where Samsung genuinely improved things. Wired charging now runs at 60W, up from 45W. In practice, I hit 75% in about half an hour, and a full charge took around 54 minutes. That’s quick enough that a ten-minute top-up before heading out actually buys you meaningful hours. Wireless charging is bumped to 25W on the Qi 2.2 standard, which is fairly standard.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
But here’s the catch, and it’s a baffling one. Even though it supports Qi2 speeds, Samsung didn’t put the magnetic ring in the back of the phone. So if you want that satisfying magnetic snap, the MagSafe or Pixel Snap experience where the charger or accessory just clicks into place, you have to go buy a specific magnet-equipped case. On a $1,300 phone, that’s just annoying, and it’s the kind of small omission that nags at you every time you fumble a wireless charger and struggle with aligning the charging coil.
Should you buy the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Galaxy S26 Ultra doesn’t reinvent anything. What it does is take the established Ultra formula and tighten every screw. An improved Armor Aluminum frame, a faster Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 finally drawing level with Apple, and that genuinely clever Privacy Display push the device forward in ways that matter.
Advertisement
Sure, the 5,000 mAh battery feels dated in 2026, the AI tricks are still a bit meh, and skipping native magnetic charging is baffling. But after spending months with the phone, none of that outweighed how much it simply does. It has the best stylus on any phone, a quad-camera system that’s now pretty strong in low light, and a beautiful, glare-resistant display. It’s still the phone to beat for power users. If you want one device that does everything, this is the one to get.
Why not try
If $1,300 stings, or the Ultra’s specific trade-offs don’t line up with how you live, here are three other options you can consider:
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max — The best for ecosystem loyalists and battery life warriors. It’s the Galaxy S26 Ultra’s natural rival at roughly the same price. On the downside, it skips the stylus, misses out on true 10x zoom. To its credit, it crushes the Samsung phone on battery mileage, and it’s still the safest bet for point-and-shoot video. Moroever, nothing touches it if you already own a Mac, iPad, or Apple Watch.
Google Pixel 10 Pro XL— An obvious pick for clean software and effortless photography. It’s also cheaper, and it runs Google’s pure, bloat-free Android experience. The Tensor G5 won’t quite keep up in terms of raw performance, but the Pixel still pulls ahead on plain old still photography. It’s also got built-in magnetic charging via Pixel Snap, which is pretty convenient.
Samsung Galaxy S26+— Best for the majority who want flagship muscle for less. If the S Pen, the 200MP camera, the 5x zoom, and the Privacy Display all leave you cold, the S26+ is a smart buy. From $1,100 you get the same fast Snapdragon, the same seven-year update promise, and a near-identical design in a lighter body, with $200 still in your pocket, a seven-year update promise, and a near-identical design in a lighter body, with $200 still in your pocket.
How we tested
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
I got my hands on the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra in its launch week, and over the course of the past four months, I have used it as my primary phone. I have traveled with it extensively, keeping it hooked to a 5G network and even using it as an on-the-go hotspot device for an extended spell.
As far as testing goes, the performance tests were conducted on two separate occasions, with vastly different ambient weather to get a clear picture of how it handles heat build-up and dissipation. Cameras were tested across four cities in different lighting conditions throughout the day.
On the software side, the phone was running One UI 8.5 stable build. At the time of writing this review, there were 140 apps running on the phone, which included third-party applications as well as those that came pre-installed on the phone. All testing was done with the device running in its native performance state.
We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.
Dreame AirStyle Era: two-minute review
The Dreame AirStyle Era is an eight-in-one multi-styler that works as a dryer and creates smooth, curly, bouncy, or straightened styles from a single device.
On paper, it looks like one for TechRadar’s best hair styler roundup, and it’s the follow-up to the seven-in-one AirStyle Pro, addressing some of that model’s most obvious gaps. Namely, adding a diffuser for the first time, and replacing the Pro’s flyaway attachment with a U-shaped straightening nozzle.
Advertisement
The auto-wrap curl barrels remain the headline act. The 360-degree airflow draws hair in automatically and produces bouncy, natural-looking curls without the need to manually wind sections around a barrel.
Latest Videos From
For fine to medium hair, the results are impressive, and at $349.99 / £349 / AU$699 the Era undercuts the Dyson Airwrap by $250 / £130 / AU$150 while producing comparable curl results as an Airwrap alternative. The smoothing brushes perform well too, and the diffuser is a welcome addition for anyone with naturally curly or wavy hair.
The Dreame AirStyle Era styling system includes interchangeable attachments for drying, smoothing, curling and volumizing (Image credit: Future)
The issues are harder to ignore, though. The maximum temperature of 176F / 80C — unchanged from the AirStyle Pro — will be a limiting factor for anyone with thicker or longer hair. You could rope in one of the best hair dryers for that first stage, but that rather defeats the point of an all-in-one tool. The straightening nozzle is also more fiddly than expected, not to mention time consuming.
None of these are dealbreakers on their own, but together they add up to a tool that falls slightly short of its potential. The Era is still the most complete multi-styler Dreame has produced, and the most attractive multi-styler I’ve tested, and at this price it’s a worthy Airwrap dupe, but it needs to be better than it is in a few key areas to make a truly compelling case.
Advertisement
That’s the two-minute version; read on for my full Dreame AirStyle Era review.
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
Dreame AirStyle Era review: price & availability
List price: $349.99 / £349 / AU$699
Available: US, Australia and UK
Launched: May 2026
The Dreame AirStyle Era costs $349.99 / £349 / AU$699 and is available directly from Dreame and Amazon in the US, Dreame in the UK, and from Dreame Australia as well as from several third-party retailers.
It sits closer in price to the $279.99 Shark FlexStyle in the US (which costs AU$499 in Australia), but is more akin in terms of features and attachments to the $599.99 / AU$849 Dyson Airwrap. It’s the follow-up to Dreame’s seven-in-one AirStyle Pro, which had a higher list price of $399.99 in the US but was rarely sold at that, while the latter’s list price is lower in Australia at AU$599.
Advertisement
(There are also other, cheaper Dyson Airwrap dupes, but few come with the auto-wrap curl barrels of these four stylers.)
In comparison to its predecessor, the AirStyle Era swaps the Flyaway Attachment of the Pro for a U-shaped straightening nozzle and adds a diffuser for the first time, addressing one of the glaring gaps in the original’s feature set.
It’s also had a meaningful upgrade under the hood — the NTC temperature sensor now checks 1,000 times per second compared to 300 on the AirStyle Pro, which in practice means more consistent heat distribution and less risk of spikes that could cause damage.
Fast dryer, straightening nozzle, diffuser nozzle, 32mm auto-wrap barrels (L+R), hard smoothing brush, soft smoothing brush, round volumizing brush
The UK listing features different specifications than the US page – 28°C/55°C/80°C for temperatures and 50m/s, 57m/s, 65m/s for wind speeds. We tested the US model so use the US figures throughout.
Dreame AirStyle Era review: design
Pink and bronze colorway with pebbled leather-texture grip
Eight attachments covering drying, curling, straightening, smoothing and diffusing
Twist-on mechanism same as the AirStyle Pro but more secure
Comes with a storage box and bag
The Dreame AirStyle Era follows the same basic design as its predecessor (and all other multi-stylers for that matter) – a tube-shaped dryer onto which you twist different styling heads.
It comes in a single pink colorway, not too dissimilar to the pink Dyson Airwrap i.d, with bronze accents at either end, and a soft pebbled leather-texture grip running the length of the handle.
Advertisement
It feels and looks solid and luxurious, and at 0.64lbs without the cord, it’s light enough that your arm doesn’t start aching even when working through a full set of curls.
The controls consist of two buttons with LEDs that let you cycle through the two heat settings. and three wind speeds. The cool shot is built into the top of the on/off slider rather than given its own dedicated button, and you enable and disable it by sliding up once for on, and sliding up again for off.
The AirStyle Era’s textured handle feels solid and luxurious and features dedicated controls for airflow, temperature and power settings (Image credit: Future)
These controls sit at a natural thumb position on the handle and toe a delicate line between being easy to control mid-style and difficult to press accidentally. This is much rarer on stylers than it should be.
At the base of the handle is a removable dual intake filter— an inner stainless steel mesh that keeps fine hair and particles out of the motor, and an outer mesh that prevents tangling.
Advertisement
A small cleaning brush is included for maintenance, and the filter is straightforward to remove and reattach. Attached to this filter is the cord that runs to 9.2ft / 2.8m with a 360-degree anti-tangle swivel at the handle end.
Each of the eight attachments twist on using the same mechanism as the AirStyle Pro, but unlike the heads on the older model, the Era’s attachments securely lock into place because they’re also magnetic. This was a major complaint in our AirStyle Pro review and I’m glad it’s been resolved.
In terms of the attachments, the line-up is as follows:
Fast dryer: A concentrated nozzle for quick drying
Straightening nozzle: U-shaped head with dual airflow channels that direct air downward to smooth and straighten without heating plates
Diffuser: Bowl diffuser with prongs for dry curls without disrupting them
32mm auto-wrap barrels (x2): One for left curls, one for right; 360-degree airflow draws hair in to create curls without manually winding sections
Soft smoothing brush: Spherical teeth designed for fine, fragile, or chemically treated hair
Hard smoothing brush: Conical teeth for coarser, thicker, or heavily product-styled hair
Round volumizing brush: Wider tooth spacing to reduce tangling, with perforations to diffuse airflow and create lift at the roots
A close-up look at the AirStyle Era’s branding, filter and styling tools (Image credit: Future)
The two additions — the straightening nozzle and diffuser — address the most obvious gaps in the original AirStyle Pro’s feature set.
Advertisement
If you wanted smooth, straight hair or defined natural curls from the Pro, you needed separate tools entirely. The Era fixes that, and the result is a kit that not only covers the full range of everyday styling needs, but it makes it the only styler that can truly rival the Dyson Airwrap in terms of scope and scale.
Elsewhere, everything ships in a leather-textured storage box that keeps the attachments organized and easy to find, plus you get a travel bag if you need something more portable.
Design score: 4.5 out of 5
Dreame AirStyle Era review: performance
Fast dryer attachment works well on fine to medium hair; may struggle with thicker, longer hair
Auto-wrap curling barrels produce good results but swapping between directions is fiddly
Straightening nozzle is less effective than the flyaway attachment it replaces
I started, as Dreame recommends, by removing most of the water in my hair with the fast dryer attachment. Like all multi-stylers of this type, you need to get hair to around 80% dry before switching to any of the styling attachments for best results, and the fast dryer handled that first stage well enough on my fine, shoulder-length hair.
It’s not the hottest of stylers though, and anyone with thicker or longer hair may find themselves reaching for a standalone dryer to get there faster. This was a complaint with the original Pro and hasn’t been fixed, it seems.
Dreame AirStyle Era soft smoothing brush (left), hard smoothing brush (center) and round volumizing brush (right) attachments (Image credit: Future)
The auto-wrap curling barrels are where the Era earns its keep. The 360-degree airflow draws hair in and wraps it around the barrel automatically, producing bouncy, defined curls without the need to manually wind sections. The results hold well, and the curls have a natural quality that can be hard to achieve with traditional tongs. The catch is that if you want the curls to go in different directions, you need to physically swap between the left and right attachment. This isn’t just tricky, because the attached barrel is hot, but it interrupts your rhythm. The Dyson Airwrap handles this on a single, multi-directional barrel, and once you’ve used that system it’s hard not to notice the difference here.
Advertisement
The straightening nozzle is the most interesting new addition on paper — a U-shaped head that uses dual airflow channels to smooth and straighten without heating plates. It’s more intuitive than the flyaway attachment it replaced, while producing a very similar finish, but I found it more fiddly than I’d hoped. You can only smooth small sections at a time and this takes a while, which feels like a step backwards for anyone who relied on the flyaway attachment for quick touch-ups and frizz control.
The diffuser attachment is a new addition to the AirStyle Era compared to the previous AirStyle Pro and it’s great at enhancing natural curls and waves while reducing frizz (Image credit: Future)
The diffuser does what it should. For naturally curly or wavy hair, it distributes airflow evenly without disturbing the curl pattern, and the results are noticeably better than using the fast dryer attachment on the same hair type. It’s not doing anything the category hasn’t seen before, but its absence from the AirStyle Pro was a gap, and it’s good to have it here.
The fast dryer attachment quickly removes moisture before styling; it’s great for fine-to-medium hair but people with thicker and/or longer hair might get frustrated with the device’s temperatures (Image credit: Future)
Finally, the brushes. The soft and hard smoothing brushes both perform well. The soft brush is gentle on fine or fragile hair, with the airflow automatically redirecting downward when attached to leave your hair feeling smooth. The hard brush handles coarser or more tangled hair well, and separates knots without pulling.
In testing, my favorite brush is the round volumizing brush. It’s great for lifting roots and adding shape at the ends and it can even create loose curls.
Advertisement
In terms of noise levels, Dreame claims it produces 76dB, and in testing I recorded 79dB on the highest speed setting. That’s slightly louder than the spec sheet suggests although not unreasonable for a tool of this type and it’s quiet enough to hear music or have a conversation.
The straightening nozzle (pictured) has replaced the flyaway attachment from the previous Pro model and helps smooth hair (Image credit: Future)
Performance score: 4 out of 5
Should you buy the Dreame AirStyle Era?
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Attribute
Notes
Rating
Advertisement
Value
Competitively priced against the Dyson Airwrap and broader than the Shark FlexStyle in terms of attachments, though the performance doesn’t always match the promise.
3.5 / 5
Design
Advertisement
Comfortable, well-balanced, and good-looking with an improved twist-on attachment mechanism.
4.5 / 5
Performance
Strong curling and volumizing results, but the straightening nozzle disappoints and temperature limits will be a factor for thicker hair types.
Advertisement
4 / 5
Buy it if…
Don’t buy it if…
Advertisement
Dreame AirStyle Era: also consider
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Header Cell – Column 0
Dreame AirStyle Era (reviewed)
Dreame Airstyle Pro
Dyson Airwrap i.d.
Shark FlexStyle
Advertisement
Weight (styler only, no cord):
0.64lbs / 0.29kg
0.6lbs / 0.3kg
1.4lbs / 0.6kg XXCHECK
Advertisement
1.5 lbs / 0.7kg
Styler dimensions (L x W):
10.2 x 1.8in / 26 x 4.5cm
10.2 x 1.8in / 26 x 4.5cm
Advertisement
10.7 x 1.9in / 27.2 x 4.8cm
11.3 x 1.7in / 28.7 x 4.4cm
Cord:
9.2ft / 2.8m
Advertisement
9.2ft / 2.8m
8.5 ft / 2.7m
8ft / 2.4m
Temperatures:
Advertisement
2 + cool shot
2 + cool shot
2 + cool shot
3 + cool shot
Advertisement
Speeds:
3
3
3
Advertisement
3
Wattage:
1,300W
1,300W
Advertisement
1,300W
1,400W (US), 1,600W (UK)
List price:
$349.99 / £349
Advertisement
$399.99 / £299 / AU$599
$599.99 / £479.99 / AU$849
$279.99 / £269.99 / AU$499.99
Advertisement
How I tested the Dreame Airstyle Era
I used the AirStyle Era as my main styling tool for a week. During this time I used it to dry my hair, and tested all the different attachments, paying particular attention to the auto-wrap curlers.
I compared the styling results to what I managed to achieve with other similar stylers I’ve tested – including the Dyson Airwrap i.d. and Shark FlexStyle. I also assessed how easy the styler was to use and the effectiveness of its design and features.
Cloudflare said agentic traffic has surpassed human traffic for the first time in internet history.
Cloudflare has acquired Voidzero, the company behind the open source JavaScript tooling ecosystem Vite, for an undisclosed amount, at a time when working with AI coding agents is becoming the new norm.
Acquiring Voidzero will help Cloudflare expand AI-generated code analysis, it said, by unifying the Vite build tool, Vitest test runner, Rust-based Rolldown bundler and Oxc toolchain, natively, into its ecosystem.
“The best engineers I know are shipping more code than ever and writing less of it by hand. AI is doing more of the typing, so everything around it has to keep up,” said Matthew Prince, the co-founder and CEO of Cloudflare.
Advertisement
The company said that merging Cloudflare’s global edge network and developer platform with the “modern web’s industry-standard toolchain” will allow the company to create a “frictionless” deployment stack from local code to the global network.
“Our mission at Voidzero has always been to eliminate the fragmentation and performance bottlenecks of the modern web stack,” said Evan You, the founder and CEO of Voidzero.
“Joining forces allows us to keep the Vite ecosystem neutral, open and vendor-agnostic, while giving us the resources and global infrastructure to supercharge the developer experience for millions of engineers worldwide.” The two companies have been collaborating since 2024.
The Voidzero team, including You, will join Cloudflare following the acquisition, but will continue to lead Vite and its other tools.
Advertisement
Alongside the acquisition, Cloudflare is also committing $1m to a Vite ecosystem fund to support independent maintainers and contributors, administered by Vite’s core team.
The Cloudflare Vite plugin alone has reached nearly 14m weekly downloads – or more than 10pc of Vite’s entire weekly volume – while AI usage at the company has grown by 600pc in a matter of months, according to Cloudflare.
The acquisition comes just a month after Cloudflare laid off 20pc of its workers, amounting to more than 1,100 employees, in preference for a slimmer, more AI-powered workforce.
The IT service provider, which claims to interface with around 20pc of the web, recently reported that agentic bots make up more than 57pc of internet traffic, with humans now only accounting less than 43pc.
Advertisement
“That happened faster than I predicted”, said Prince in a post on X. “Thought it would be end of 2027, then early 2027, but agentic traffic [is] growing so fast that bots have now passed human traffic online for the first time in the internet’s history.”
Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.
Taiwanese PC hardware and peripherals manufacturer Thermaltake showcased its Dockpower PSUs at Computex 2026 in Taiwan this week, describing them as the “next generation of PSU architecture.” Read Entire Article Source link
Wakura Onsen has introduced a new attraction that mixes traditional hot spring relaxation with some familiar Pokemon characters. This brand-new Pokemon Footbath is located in Yuttari Park on the Noto Peninsula, specifically in Nanao City, and was just opened just a stone’s throw away from the Nanao Bay beach.
We can thank Nanao City and the Pokemon With You Foundation for this amazing new place, which was created when local lawmakers and foundation representatives collaborated to come up with something that would catch tourists’ interest while also assisting the town in recovery. If you check behind the scenes, you’ll see that hot spring water from the Wakura source is channeled into a 15-meter basin. Then there’s the strange spout that resembles the hugely popular water-type Pokemon Gyarados, one of several other Pokémon statues and decorations scattered throughout the region. Pikachu, Vaporeon, Psyduck, Quaxly, Poliwag, and Politoed all appear. Many of the Pokémon were picked because they are water-types and so suitable for an outdoor footbath.
EPIC POKÉMON MODEL BUILDING KIT – Relive your thrilling training journey with this LEGO Pokémon Venusaur, Charizard and Blastoise (72153) building…
3 ICONIC POKÉMON FIGURES – This detailed Pokémon model kit features 3 posable Kanto partner Pokémon in their fierce and final evolution forms…
DYNAMIC DISPLAY PIECE – Each Pokémon figure can stand alone while posed in a battle stance or be mounted on its biome stand, each of which can be…
People can simply show up and remove their shoes and socks before resting down with their feet in the warm water, as the statues are all very inviting without being too intrusive. Some people simply hang out for a while, enjoying the views of the ocean and the overall peaceful atmosphere. You can visit every day from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., but bad weather may occasionally force the facility to close on short notice. The best part is that it’s absolutely free, and you can park nearby as needed. Oh, and they give you a small towel to dry your feet before re-lacing your shoes. There are also several fantastically themed manhole covers depicting the same Pokémon throughout the region, so fans should keep an eye out.
Advertisement
Getting there from a major city may take some planning, but it is still rather simple. For example, you can take a train from Osaka and mix in some limited express and shinkansen trains before catching a bus to the park. This footbath is essentially a great way to help locals while also offering tourists with some fun and enjoyment, allowing people to experience the Wakura Onsen water for themselves in a family-friendly setting that is excellent for those of you die-hard franchise fans. [Source]
Apple’s next major Mac software update may mark the beginning of the end for Intel-powered Macs while also pushing deeper into AI-powered experiences. New rumors surrounding macOS 27 suggest Apple is preparing significant changes ranging from smarter Siri capabilities to refinements for its controversial “Liquid Glass” design language.
According to reports, macOS 27 could become the first version of macOS to substantially reduce or fully end support for Intel-based Macs, completing a transition Apple began in 2020 with the launch of its first Apple Silicon chips. While Apple has steadily shifted focus toward M-series processors over the past several years, macOS 27 may represent the clearest sign yet that the company is ready to leave Intel hardware behind. Although this is not new news – Apple was already looking to phase out Intel-powered Macs when it rolled out macOS Tahoe last year.
The timing would align with Apple’s typical software support cycle. Intel Macs have already started missing out on some Apple Intelligence features introduced during the AI push across iPhones, iPads, and Macs. Ending support entirely would allow Apple to focus more aggressively on AI, machine learning, and hardware-specific optimizations designed around Apple Silicon.
Apple appears ready to fully embrace its AI-first Mac future
One of the biggest rumored changes involves Siri. Reports suggest Apple is continuing work on a significantly smarter version of the assistant capable of handling more natural conversations, contextual awareness, and deeper app integration. While Apple’s AI rollout has faced criticism for moving more slowly than rivals like Google and OpenAI, macOS 27 could become an important part of the company’s broader Apple Intelligence strategy.
Advertisement
The update may also refine Apple’s newer “Liquid Glass” visual style, which reportedly focuses on translucent layers, reflective interface elements, and smoother animations across macOS. Early reactions to the design direction have been mixed, with some users praising the futuristic appearance while others argue it prioritizes aesthetics over clarity and usability.
MacBookUnsplash
Apple is also expected to continue integrating AI-powered productivity tools throughout macOS. Features involving summarization, writing assistance, smarter search, and proactive recommendations could become more deeply embedded into the operating system as Apple tries to make AI feel native to the Mac experience instead of functioning as a separate tool.
For users still relying on Intel Macs, however, the rumored support changes may become the biggest story. Millions of Intel-based MacBooks and desktops remain in active use, especially in businesses, schools, and creative industries. If Apple significantly cuts compatibility, many users could face difficult upgrade decisions sooner than expected.
macOS 27 may reveal Apple’s long-term strategy for the Mac
The rumored update reflects a broader shift happening across Apple’s ecosystem. The company increasingly designs software around its own custom chips, allowing tighter integration between hardware and software features. Apple Silicon Macs already deliver major advantages in battery life, performance efficiency, and AI processing compared to older Intel systems.
MacBookUnsplash
Ending Intel support would also simplify development for Apple and third-party app makers by reducing the number of architectures they need to support. However, it risks frustrating long-time Mac users whose devices may still feel perfectly functional despite losing future software support.
Apple is expected to officially unveil macOS 27 during WWDC 2026, where the company will likely detail its next-generation AI strategy across Macs, iPhones, and iPads. Until then, many of the reported features remain speculative, but the rumors strongly suggest Apple is preparing one of the most significant transitions in Mac history since the move away from Intel first began.
Those receiving aid in the famine-threatened, war-torn territory told support will remain
Humanitarian organization World Food Programme (WFP) says one of its systems was breached, and around 600,000 Gazan households receiving aid had their details improperly accessed.
Its announcement, made via Telegram on May 31, confirmed there was “a security incident” in the self-registration application used by Gazans to register for aid and applicants’ names, ID numbers, phone numbers, and location information were among the data types accessed.
Advertisement
“We understand this may be concerning, and we want to assure you that protecting your data and privacy is our top priority,” the WFP said. “The program is treating this situation with the utmost seriousness and priority.”
The organization said it temporarily suspended the registration platform to urgently apply the necessary security improvements.
Its most recent update on the situation came on June 2, when it said the platform was still down, but added that aid recipients did not need to do anything, while their support would continue to be delivered uninterrupted.
“The WFP wants to assure all those registered via the link that food assistance, cash assistance, nutritional supplementation, and all other WFP programs are continuing as usual,” it said.
Advertisement
“If you are already registered on the Self-Registration Application (SRA), your registration remains valid. There is no need to update, delete, or re-register your information at this time.”
WFP told The New Humanitarian, which first reported the story, that the attack was detected on May 14, and confirmed the scale to be in the region of 600,000 households.
The news organization also claimed, citing a whistleblower’s account of matters, that an anonymous “independent expert” contacted WFP’s Palestine team, alerting it to vulnerabilities in the SRA two days before the organization detected the breach.
The Register contacted WFP’s Rome headquarters for more details, but it did not immediately respond.
This represents around 77 percent of the country’s population, and an estimated 80 percent of the population is unemployed, unable to earn the money required to pay for a nutritionally sound diet.
WFP delivers wheat flour, high-energy biscuits, and fortified snacks to families, community kitchens, and bakeries in its effort to push back famine, as well as facilitating cash transfers.
The organization is also helping individuals get back into paid work, maintains roads, and says that when conditions allow, it will stay in the region and help local people rebuild communities, markets, and other food systems. ®
Performance-wise, there’s no pedal-assist or throttle lag, as I’ve experienced on some cheaper ebikes. I thought this would feel unnervingly fast, but the sturdy frame and wide tires are incredibly stable. I felt totally comfortable going fast (for an ebike). I avoided taking corners and tight turns at full speed because the bike is so heavy, but otherwise, I felt self-assured during testing.
With a 505-pound on-bike weight limit, the Nomad 2 has a higher load capacity than other ebikes I’ve tested, particularly folding models. Velotric also advertises a 1,000-pound towing capacity. That number registers impressively high to me, but I haven’t tested the claim. Even so, I’m skeptical of how long the battery would last while towing 1,000 pounds of cargo.
The battery range is pretty standard for a full-size ebike, though impressive for a model of this heft. Velotric advertises a 65-mile range for pedal-assist and 45 miles for throttle, and I appreciate that both ranges are listed. That said, I’ve maxed out at around 37 miles on the throttle and at around 47 miles with pedal assist. To be fair, I’m often riding on hills and bumpy surfaces, which also drains the battery faster. I also enjoy the IPX7 waterproof battery housing, as I’m liable to get caught out in the rain during the shoulder seasons of southwest Montana, where I live. My Rad Powerbike can’t handle rain with its partially enclosed battery, so I’m more likely to take the Velotric out if the weather is iffy.
An Off-Road Delight
Photograph: Maggie Slepian
I tested this bike for commuting purposes on the paved roads of my very suburban town. I also used it off-road on bike paths, gravel, rutted dirt, and in open fields. It worked well in all scenarios. The massive 4-inch Kenda tires, which came perfectly inflated, do a wonderful job absorbing impact while rolling easily over obstacles. I encountered some ruts and ridges that I thought would yield a painful thud, but the bike handled them smoothly.
Ofqual says smart glasses, hidden earpieces, and AI tools are creating a new generation of cheating headaches
England’s exams watchdog is warning that the next generation of school cheating may arrive not in a student’s pocket, but perched on their face.
In a new podcast, Ofqual chief regulator Sir Ian Bauckham said advances in consumer technology are creating fresh headaches for exam authorities, with smart glasses, hidden earpieces, and other connected gadgets raising the prospect of increasingly sophisticated cheating during exams.
Advertisement
“We shouldn’t underestimate the challenge involved here,” Bauckham said, warning that regulators will need to move quickly as technology evolves.
Students smuggling phones into exam halls is hardly a new phenomenon. According to Ofqual, mobile phones and other smart devices were involved in 2,225 malpractice cases during 2025 exams, accounting for 44.3 percent of all student malpractice incidents. Device-related offenses have been the largest category of student malpractice every year since 2018.
What appears to be keeping regulators awake at night is what comes next.
A smartphone hidden in a blazer pocket is one thing, but a pair of ordinary-looking glasses quietly displaying information to the wearer, or a near-invisible earpiece feeding them answers from elsewhere, is harder to spot from the back of an exam hall.
Advertisement
The concerns arise as consumer technology companies continue to cram cameras, microphones, AI assistants, and internet connectivity into an ever-growing range of wearable devices. What starts life as a gadget for checking messages or translating languages can easily become something more useful when sitting a three-hour mathematics exam.
Bauckham also suggested artificial intelligence poses a separate challenge outside the exam hall. Ofqual is examining ways to ensure coursework remains authentic as AI-generated submissions become harder to distinguish from student work.
Possible responses include tighter requirements around referencing sources and greater involvement from teachers in verifying that students actually produced the work they hand in. Bauckham even floated the possibility of removing coursework entirely from some qualifications if confidence in its authenticity cannot be maintained.
For now, students are still expected to turn up with a pen and whatever knowledge they’ve managed to retain. But as smart glasses and AI gadgets become cheaper and harder to spot, invigilators may soon need to know as much about consumer electronics as they do about exam regulations. ®
The winning Google Doodle artwork by Kameirah Johnson of Renton, Wash. (Google Image)
The Google homepage has a special look this morning thanks to the artwork of a Seattle-area teen.
Kameirah Johnson, a senior at Lakeside School, is the winner of the 2026 Doodle for Google contest, and her work is now displayed online for the millions of people who visit the search giant.
Kameirah, 18, of Renton, Wash., beat out tens of thousands of submissions from K-12 students in the annual contest. The 2026 theme was “My superpower is …” and her original work, titled “Hair Power: The Crown That Grows from Us” celebrates hair as a symbol of identity and inherited strength.
In April, Kameirah was selected as one of five finalists and Thursday she appeared on “TODAY” in New York to be revealed as the winner. She said she was “super excited” that her artwork could reach so many people.
The artwork depicts three figures — inspired by Kameirah, her mother Simone, and her sister Kalieyah — lying in the grass, their hair styled as crowns. She told “TODAY” that growing up black she learned to have a lot of pride in her hair, and her biggest inspiration is her mom.
Advertisement
“When I was a little kid, I’d go to preschool and every single week I’d have new hairstyle, whether it’s braids, afro puffs, etc.,” Kameirah said. “And she just really taught me to love my hair and love my culture and who I am.”
In the fall, Kameirah is headed to NYU — her “dream school” since she was 11 — to study economics and studio arts, with an eye toward the intersection of art and business. She hopes to own a gallery someday.
The top prize comes with a $55,000 college scholarship and a $50,000 technology package for Kameirah’s school.
Asked by “TODAY” what she hopes people will take away from her artwork, Kameirah said she hopes people will “feel inspired to live in their own skin, express themselves and be who they are.”
Advertisement
Now in its 17th year, the Doodle for Google contest has attracted Seattle-area winners in the past. Mahee Chandrasekhar, a ninth grader at Redmond High School, was the Washington state winner in the 16th contest. In 2023, sixth-grader Rebecca Wu of the International School in Bellevue, had her artwork recognized.
They describe the feat as “a far cry from designer babies, but nevertheless a step in that direction.”
Dieter Egli, an associate professor of developmental cell biology at Columbia University and his co-authors, including Nathan Treff of Nucleus Genomics, a New York-based DNA-testing startup, say the technology could help fix disease-causing mutations in embryos. “We’re not throwing the final ‘OK, you will have gene-edited babies tomorrow’ at the public,” said Egli. “That is a process that can occur through discussion matched with scientific progress….”
Previous gene-editing efforts have often used Crispr, which can cut out parts of the DNA sequence, but the technology can also cause damage if the wrong DNA is targeted or cut out. In 2018, Chinese scientist He Jianku said he used Crispr to tweak DNA in human embryos and was imprisoned for the work. The technology Egli’s group used, called base editing, allows them to target individual DNA letters in sequences more precisely with fewer adverse effects… Egli’s group focused on altering two genes, one that can raise the risk of heart disease and one that is tied to blood disorders like sickle cell disease, and the research showed they were sometimes able to do so successfully, in the same embryo, without damage.
Advertisement
“I am generally supportive of the concept of embryo editing to prevent genetic disease,” said Dr. Paula Amato, a fertility expert at Oregon Health & Science University who wasn’t involved in the research… Base editing has been used in human embryos before, according to peer-reviewed studies. The technology was used to correct a disease-causing mutation and an Alzheimer’s disease-risk gene variant, said Alexis Komor, associate professor of biochemistry and molecular biophysics at the University of California, San Diego, who wasn’t involved in the work. “There really is not any unmet medical or clinical need for this, especially from an in vitro fertilization perspective,” Komor said. “Usually what you’ll hear is that they’re doing it just so that you know we can prevent genetic diseases, but there are so many other better ways to do that.”
Using embryo editing to create babies is illegal in the U.S. and many other countries. Scientists have long worried that it is a slippery slope and that the technology could ultimately be used to promote eugenics. Her worry is that “they’re basically building a blueprint” for more ethically problematic forms of embryo editing.
“In my opinion, I think this is a huge no-no,” Komor said. “There’s just no ethical way to use this….”
Nucleus Genomics Chief Executive Kian Sadeghi said his company plans to fund Egli’s further research, building on the new findings. His company sells a polygenic embryo-screening product, which screens prospective parents’ embryos and produces risk scores for their likelihood of developing disease, as well as factors like height, IQ and eye color. The company has said the IQ predictions are limited in accuracy. The research was published online Monday on a preprint server.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login