Security teams log 54% of successful attacks and alert on just 14%. The rest move through your environment unseen.
The Picus whitepaper shows how breach and attack simulation tests your SIEM and EDR rules so threats stop slipping by detection.
Meta has revealed that 20,225 Instagram users had their accounts hijacked in a recent incident where attackers used Meta’s AI-powered support system to reset passwords.
As BleepingComputer reported one week ago, the threat actors exploited a flaw in the company’s High Touch Support (HTS) tool, an AI-assisted support system that helps users regain access after being locked out of their Instagram accounts.
By exploiting the fact that HTS didn’t verify whether email addresses were associated with the targeted Instagram accounts, they obtained password reset links that allowed them to log in and hijack accounts without two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled.
“Users can request support from HTS and, as part of that process, can ask that a password reset link be sent to their email address. The tool itself worked properly and functioned as intended; however due to a bug in a separate code path, the system did not properly verify that the email address provided by the individual requesting a password reset matched the email address associated with that user’s Instagram account,” said Amber Hannah, Meta’s associate general counsel for incident response legal, in a data breach letter recently filed with Maine’s Office of the Attorney General.
“As a result, when an individual provided an email address not previously associated with the account, the system incorrectly sent a password reset link to that unassociated email rather than rejecting the request. This allowed unauthorized third parties to receive a password reset link for accounts they did not own. Upon resetting the password, the unauthorized party was able to log in to the account if the account holder had not enabled two-factor authentication (2FA).”
After a wave of user reports regarding these attacks hit social media platforms, Andy Stone, Meta’s vice president of communications, replied to one of the affected users, stating that the “issue has been resolved, and we are securing impacted accounts.”
BleepingComputer has also contacted Meta last week for comment on this security breach, but we have yet to hear back.
“We are writing to inform you that a vulnerability in an Instagram account recovery support tool was used to potentially compromise the Instagram accounts of 30 users in your jurisdiction. All accounts have been secured to prevent any continued unauthorized access,” Hannah added. “On May 31, 2026, Meta discovered that there was a vulnerability in an AI-assisted account recovery system for Instagram (‘High Touch Support’ or ‘HTS’) that was exploited by unauthorized third parties to perform password resets on Instagram user accounts.”

While Meta didn’t specify when the attacks began in the breach letter, the filing on Maine’s OAG website says the breach occurred on April 17, which is likely the date of the first attack exploiting the HTS flaw.
The company says it has no information on what personal information might have been accessed or stolen from the compromised accounts, but noted that the attackers could’ve gained access to affected Instagram users’ contact information (email address and/or phone number), dates of birth, social media posts and content (photos, videos, stories), direct messages and communications, account activity and interaction history, profile information (biography, profile photo), as well as other connected accounts and linked services.
After discovering the incident, the company disabled the HTS AI-powered support system and all password reset links it had generated to ensure that all future hijack attempts part of the same malicious campaign would be blocked.
It also enrolled all potentially stolen accounts into a mandatory security checkpoint and asked all affected users to reset their passwords again and re-authenticate to secure and regain control of the compromised accounts.
“Prior to re-launching the tool, Meta will fix the authentication check in the Instagram recovery entry point to ensure proper verification of email addresses against existing account information before any password reset is initiated,” Meta added. “Additionally, Meta is conducting a comprehensive review of similar account recovery flows across Meta’s platforms to identify and remediate any potential issues.”
Prior to this incident, Ireland also fined Meta $264 million over a 2018 data breach that exposed the names, email addresses, phone numbers, and physical locations of over 29 million Facebook accounts.
Meta was also fined €265 million ($275.5 million) in November 2022 for failing to protect Facebook users’ data from scrapers, and another €91 million ($100 million) for storing the passwords of hundreds of millions of users in plaintext.
Security teams log 54% of successful attacks and alert on just 14%. The rest move through your environment unseen.
The Picus whitepaper shows how breach and attack simulation tests your SIEM and EDR rules so threats stop slipping by detection.
ASUS has introduced a new initiative to make genuine laptop battery replacements easier for customers across India. Through this initiative, customers can now replace their laptop batteries with ease and get proper service and warranty advantages in the process. Rather than opting for risky third-party alternatives, customers can now purchase official ASUS batteries. This initiative covers not only regular laptops but also gaming laptops.

ASUS has launched a Battery Finder microsite that will make laptop battery replacement easy for its customers. Using this facility, consumers can enter their laptop model and find a compatible battery. The system also finds the locations nearest to them where such batteries are available at exclusive ASUS outlets and channel partners. Consumers can even contact ASUS’s authorized service centers for assistance.
The battery replacement program supports many of ASUS’s most popular laptop series. Customers with Vivobook laptops can access genuine replacement batteries through the initiative. Several ROG gaming laptops are also part of the program. ASUS has further expanded coverage to include ExpertBook, ProArt, and TUF models. The Battery Finder platform helps users confirm compatibility before visiting a store or service center.
As part of enhancing its customer support services, ASUS has extended its post-sale service network in various parts of India. This has included areas such as Delhi-NCR, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Maharashtra, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Gujarat, Punjab, and others. ASUS has made this service available as part of its Assurance Program. The organization’s main aim is to provide reliable and effective service, warranties, and an enhanced customer experience.
Apart from increasing the number of battery sources, ASUS is also working to help consumers manage their batteries effectively. Consumers are advised on how to charge their laptop batteries to ensure that their performance remains high. ASUS also highlights the need to control laptop temperature and have devices serviced regularly.
The lobby of Hyundai’s Seoul headquarters now waters its own plants. On Monday it was also handling security and deliveries, a row of robots laid on for one important visitor: Jensen Huang.
Nvidia’s chief executive was in the South Korean capital to deepen the chipmaker’s alliance with Hyundai Motor Group, and the pitch on display in that remodelled lobby, which Hyundai has rebuilt as a “physical AI testbed”, was the whole point.
After talks with Hyundai executive chair Chung Euisun, the two companies laid out an expanded plan to turn physical AI and robotics from research projects into industrial products, spanning mobility, manufacturing, and robotics.
The two are getting “very very close” to industrialising robotics, Huang told reporters, adding that they plan to bring AI to “all forms of mobility.” He was effusive about his host’s main advantage, scale.
“Hyundai is incredible at manufacturing, incredible at mobility, incredible at heavy industries, manufacturing at extremely large scales,” he said. “No one is in a better position to take advantage of that and to create that than Hyundai.”
The clearest shift in the roadmap is location: moving robotics off the lab bench and onto the factory floor. The companies want to use Hyundai’s manufacturing base to build globally scalable robotics platforms, training the machines in simulation first. The marquee example is Boston Dynamics’ Atlas humanoid, the Hyundai-owned robot whose production-ready version drew investor attention at January’s CES.
Much of the conversation centred on Hyundai’s 9 trillion won (about $5.9bn) plan to build an AI data centre, a robot manufacturing cluster, and a hydrogen plant in the western port city of Saemangeum, a site Huang cheerfully rebranded South Korea’s “AI Valley.”
Chung suggested more investment would follow and floated a “perfect AI ecosystem,” including a joint data hub, if Nvidia formally joins the project. Notably, it has not yet. For now Nvidia’s commitment is enthusiasm, plus the prospect of selling a great deal of compute, with the data centre expected to run on tens of thousands of its Blackwell GPUs.
The courtship fits Nvidia’s wider strategy. It has been wiring itself into the hardware end of AI, holding talks with LG Electronics on robotics and data centres, running factory-floor humanoid trials with Siemens, and pouring billions into AI equity stakes. Carmakers, with their plants, supply chains, and capital, are among the most valuable partners for a company betting that the same models behind chatbots will soon run machines in the real world.
Investors liked what they heard, with Hyundai Motor shares jumping almost 7% and Nvidia rising more than 6% on the day. Hyundai has said it wants to mass-produce Atlas from 2028, at up to 30,000 units a year. Whether the robots arrive on schedule is another question, but the ambition is plain.
For Hyundai, the future of carmaking looks less like an assembly line than a fleet of machines that taught themselves the job. For Nvidia, it is one more industry that runs on its chips, from the design software to the factory floor to the robots rolling off it.
Lilian Schmidt could not, for the life of her, figure out how to get her daughter to go to sleep.
None of the advice given to her by sleep experts or her pediatrician worked—not using a white noise machine, not buying blackout curtains, not even giving her a massage. “Every single day, it took like two to three hours to put her to bed,” the brand consultant from Zurich recalls. “She’d scream and fight and we would all be so exhausted and frustrated by the end of the day.”
When her daughter was 3 and a half years old, a bleary-eyed and desperate Schmidt turned to a controversial parenting tool: ChatGPT. The advice it offered “was completely opposite from everything I’d heard before,” she says. “It said she needed more stimulation,” suggesting that her daughter chew gum or jump on a trampoline before bed.
To Schmidt’s utter shock, it worked. Within five minutes, her daughter snuggled up next to her and fell asleep. “I was freaking out,” she says. “I was like, ‘Oh my God, nobody was able to help me except ChatGPT.’”
From there, Schmidt, who also has a 14-year-old stepson, became something of an AI evangelist. In June 2025, she posted a TikTok video with the caption, “I Turned ChatGPT into my coparent,” and it went viral. Her follower count swelled to 27,000 in just three weeks. She made her own custom GPT, Coparent, and started selling access to it for $37 on her website.
Schmidt is one of a growing cohort of women branding themselves as a new type of momfluencer—not one who uses aspirational imagery to make the mundane labor associated with motherhood more aesthetically appealing, but one who asks whether the labor is even necessary at all. They post videos like “The AI Assistant That’s Basically My Mom Brain Now” and “How to Use AI as a Mom,” and promote customized prompts or handbooks to moms who “want a coparent who never forgets the sunscreen or asks you to write things down,” as Schmidt writes in one TikTok caption.
One person who is relatively absent from Schmidt’s content is her longtime partner. In her videos, she’s doing pretty much all of the parenting labor, including meal prep, grocery-shopping, and kiddie arts and crafts. This is reflective of reality; moms assume the vast majority of the physical and mental labor in US households, with a 2022 Department of Labor survey finding that employed mothers spend an extra 13.5 hours per week doing chores and an average of 12.5 hours per week on childcare—a 40 percent increase from 1975.
That’s not to say that dads aren’t helping around the house. Pew data shows that fathers now spend more than twice as much time on household chores and childcare than they did 50 years ago. But by and large, women are still expected to shoulder most of the household burden.
“It’s not that my partner isn’t helping, because he is,” Schmidt says. “But for women and moms, there is so much invisible labor that you carry and everything is in your hands, and it actually takes time with your kids away from you.” Moms flocked to her page once they saw she was using AI “to actually be more present with my kids and to be more emotionally regulated, so I can be a cool mom and a happy mom and not a stressed-out one.”
Women are less likely (more than 20 percent less likely, according to one 2025 study) to use generative AI in their everyday lives than men are, a discrepancy known as the “AI gender gap.” Generative AI tools suffer from what Stephanie Leblanc-Godfrey, a founder of the company Mother AI who refers to herself as a “maternal technologist,” likes to call a “PMS” problem, meaning they tend to be “pale, male, and stale.”
Last week’s attack against Meta’s customer support affected just over 20,000 accounts, the company has now confirmed. Hackers managed to break into these profiles and most likely exfiltrate the data found inside.
Last week, news broke that cybercriminals exploited a vulnerability in Meta’s AI-powered customer support service, tricking it into sending password reset codes for other people’s accounts.
Now, the Facebook and Instagram owner filed a new report with the Office of the Maine Attorney General, in which it stated that 20,225 persons were affected. In a letter Meta sent to the Maine AG, it was said that the company discovered a flaw in High Touch Support (an AI-assisted account recovery system for Instagram) on May 31, 2026.
“The tool itself worked properly and functioned as intended; however due to a bug in a separate code path, the system did not properly verify that the email address provided by the individual requesting a password reset matched the email address associated with that user’s Instagram account. As a result, when an individual provided an email address not previously associated with the account, the system incorrectly sent a password reset link to that unassociated email rather than rejecting the request,” Meta explained.
The company says there is no evidence of data exfiltration, but leaves it as a possibility, given that the crooks were able to easily access it. That includes contact information (email address and/or phone number), date of birth, social media posts and content (photos, videos, stories), direct messages and communications, account activity and interaction history, profile information (biography, profile photo), and connected accounts and linked services.
To address the issue, Meta disabled the HTS system and reset the passwords for all affected profiles. It also enrolled all targeted accounts into a mandatory security checkpoint and asked all users to re-authenticate.
“Prior to re-launching the tool, Meta will fix the authentication check in the Instagram recovery entry point to ensure proper verification of email addresses against existing account information before any password reset is initiated,” Meta stressed. “Additionally, Meta is conducting a comprehensive review of similar account recovery flows across Meta’s platforms to identify and remediate any potential issues.”
Muhammad Yahya Patel, vCISO & Cybersecurity Advisor at Huntress, said:
“This is a new category of risk that the industry needs to start taking seriously. As AI is embedded into operational workflows, customer support, identity verification, and access management. The attack surface shifts from technical vulnerabilities to logical ones.
Any organisation deploying AI into support, identity, or access workflows needs to ask one question before go-live: what happens if an attacker treats this tool as the attack surface? AI systems that can trigger privileged actions such as password resets, account access, data retrieval this needs the same rigorous access controls and verification logic as any other privileged system. The fact that it’s AI-powered doesn’t make it lower risk. Right now, for many organisations, it’s making it higher.
The more significant issue is what this signals about the security review process for AI-powered tools before they go into production”.
Via BleepingComputer

The best antivirus for all budgets
Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.
Uber customers in the U.K. can now join an interest list to increase their chances of being matched with a Wayve autonomous vehicle — another sign that the two companies are preparing to launch a robotaxi service in London. When that launch does happen, Uber will be competing directly with Waymo, Alphabet’s self-driving company that is considered the robotaxi leader in the United States.
Uber announced the interest list on Monday in London along with a branded, black Ford Mustang Mach-E equipped with Wayve’s self-driving system. While Wayve is handling the autonomous vehicle tech, Uber has designed what happens inside, including how riders will interact with the vehicle through interactive touchscreens that support 64 languages.
Uber has teased the impending robotaxi service, but has yet to provide an official date, only saying it will launch in the coming months, pending regulatory approval. After launch, Uber customers who request a ride on the app may be matched with a Wayve vehicle, at no additional cost compared with a traditional human-driven one.
Riders can increase their chances of getting a robotaxi by going into their account settings, clicking on rider preferences, and selecting autonomous vehicles. If matched with an AV, riders will be able to decline it and opt for a human driver. The Wayve robotaxis will initially have a human safety operator behind the wheel before fully driverless operations begin in the future, Uber said.

Meanwhile, Waymo is also on London’s streets. In April, Waymo began testing its autonomous vehicles with human safety operators. The company is testing about 100 of its autonomous Jaguar I-Pace vehicles in a 100-square-mile area of the city.
The imminent showdown is complicated by Uber and Waymo’s existing partnership in the United States — one that is already showing signs of wear. The two companies, once rivals in a trade secrets lawsuit, agreed to work together in 2023 when Waymo put its self-driving vehicles on Uber’s app in Phoenix. That partnership has been relatively limited, though, since Waymo lets Phoenix customers directly hail a robotaxi through its own app as well.
The pair expanded the partnership in March 2025, when Waymo agreed to put its vehicles on the Uber app in Austin, and later, in Atlanta. In both of those cities, prospective customers cannot hail a robotaxi directly through Waymo’s app, and have to use the Uber app and hope for a match.
The two companies’ relationship has continued even as they appear to be drifting apart in other areas. Uber has spent the past two years investing in, and partnering with, dozens of autonomous vehicle companies, including Wayve.
Uber executives have also taken direct shots at Waymo, an unorthodox way to treat a business partner. For instance, Uber CTO Praveen Neppalli posted a video and commentary on X calling out the unsafe behavior of a Waymo robotaxi, calling it “scary.”
The ride-hailing giant has launched two new business divisions — a data play called AV Labs, and an operations-focused unit called Uber Autonomous Solutions — that illustrate the company’s broader ambitions to gain market share in the nascent autonomous vehicle industry.
Uber has placed many bets on autonomous vehicle companies that could compete with Waymo, most notably Wayve. In February, the U.K. startup raised $1.2 billion from a number of strategic backers, including Uber as a return investor. The total raise could reach $1.5 billion thanks to another $300 million from Uber contingent on deploying robotaxis, beginning in London.
There is one regulatory hitch that will delay the robotaxi face-off, at least for a while. The U.K. government is in the process of creating autonomous vehicle regulations, and it doesn’t appear to be wrapping up anytime soon. The government’s transportation department opened applications in May for companies interested in its AV pilot program. The department said it will take what it learns from the pilot program and apply it towards the development of its regulations.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
In just 10 days over the summer of 1854, 500 people died of cholera in the Soho neighborhood of London. The city’s population had more than doubled to 2.3 million people in the first half of the 1800s, and its sewage system could not keep up. But the streams of human waste flowing into the street and seeping into the water supply were considered unconnected to the cholera crisis. The prevailing theory of the day was that bad air — miasma — caused illness.
The English physician John Snow thought differently. Five years before the outbreak he had suggested that the diarrheal disease was actually caused by a waterborne infection rather than miasma. He soon had a chance to test his theory, mapping the location of cholera-related deaths in Soho. Snow realized that the victims used one specific water pump on Broad Street, and he persuaded city officials to remove the pump’s handle to prevent anyone else from using it. With the source eliminated, the outbreak, which had already passed its peak, ended in days.
Though it took years for Snow’s theory to achieve widespread acceptance, his approach is central to modern epidemiology. Investigating the source of outbreaks can prevent new cases, but it also gives us a better understanding of diseases and helps manage public fear. Even when infections have stopped, outbreak investigations are useful to develop strategies for preventing — and, failing that, responding to — future outbreaks.
Two recent outbreaks have demonstrated the necessity — and the challenges — of such investigations, almost two centuries after Snow’s pioneering work. The first was the hantavirus outbreak that dominated headlines last month. Then, on May 17, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared a public health emergency of international concern, the highest level of global health alert, in response to an outbreak of the deadly hemorrhagic disease Ebola in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), which, as of June 2, had killed 62 people, with 363 confirmed cases. It’s the 17th Ebola outbreak in the DRC and one of the largest on record. It has spread to neighboring Uganda, where, as of June 4, there are 16 confirmed cases, one confirmed death, and one probable case and likely death.
The first confirmed case, a healthcare worker in Bunia, DRC, died on April 24, but the outbreak may have been spreading undetected since as early as January. Investigators haven’t identified patient zero — the index case — and still don’t know how this outbreak began. Abdou Sebushishe, a doctor working with the International Medical Corps in Goma, DRC, told CBS News that up to 20 percent of current patients are themselves healthcare workers. He estimated that it may be more than six months before the outbreak could be controlled, given that the disease is outpacing the current response.
Part of the challenge is that the current outbreak is caused by the Bundibugyo strain of Ebola, which is relatively uncommon and has a genome about 30 percent different from the Ebola viruses that usually spark outbreaks. Testing for more common variants didn’t pick up the Bundibugyo virus right away, and ongoing conflict in the DRC contributed to the delay and continues to make contact tracing difficult. Unlike other strains, the Bundibugyo virus has no approved therapeutics or vaccines.
In the past, researchers have had some success identifying the index case of Ebola outbreaks. Investigators managed to identify the first patient of the 2014-2016 West Africa Ebola epidemic — the largest and deadliest in history, with more than 15,000 confirmed cases and 11,000 deaths — as a toddler in the west African nation of Guinea. What’s harder to definitively determine is how the boy, who died in December 2013 before the outbreak had been identified, contracted it. It’s possible that he came into contact with an Ebola-infected fruit bat or its droppings while playing in a hollow tree, but scientists can’t say for sure.
Investigating outbreak origins is inherently fraught and can lead to the international fingerpointing that characterized much of the Covid-19 pandemic. But it’s not primarily about assigning blame. Instead, knowing where and how outbreaks began informs how we respond to them, halt transmission, communicate to the public, and prevent them from happening again. It can identify high-risk regions and influence how public health officials monitor a disease. As the recent Ebola and hantavirus outbreaks demonstrate, however, that effort is often complicated by a host of factors, and the resulting uncertainty makes it that much harder to manage public health concerns efficiently and well.
Our epidemiological tools have come a long way since John Snow used hand-drawn maps to identify the source of the Soho cholera outbreak. The value of these new tools lies in the information they generate — which is crucial to fighting outbreaks.
Take the case of New York City’s biggest — and deadliest — outbreak of Legionnaires’ disease (LD), a bacterial infection that causes a severe pneumonia and has a fatality rate of 10 percent. By the time public health investigators detected it in the summer of 2015, dozens had already been hospitalized. It was the second-largest LD outbreak in US history, infecting 138 people and killing 16.
The initial epidemiologic investigation started with contact tracing to find the source of the disease, but the results didn’t suggest any shared exposures. Cooling towers, which provide water for air conditioning systems in the form of an inhalable mist, had been involved in previous LD outbreaks, but officials didn’t know how many cooling towers there were in the city or how well-maintained they were.
Investigators ultimately located and tested 55 cooling towers in the South Bronx, where cases were clustered, for Legionella. They identified the source: a single cooling tower atop the Opera House Hotel. The hotel disinfected the tower, and New York’s City Council passed new regulations requiring every building in the city with a cooling tower to register it with the health department, test it every 90 days, and remediate it if Legionella was found.
Within a year, the health department inspected almost 80 percent of the city’s towers — detection and disinfection that would have never been conducted otherwise. No large LD outbreaks emerged — until inspections declined in 2025. “Regulations do not enforce themselves,” Jay Varma, a physician and epidemiologist who served as incident manager for the 2015 New York outbreak, wrote last year in Healthbeat. “The Covid pandemic has sparked a strong backlash against government authority, and austerity budgets are now starving public health agencies. Infections may be inevitable, but outbreaks are a choice.”
Cholera and LD are waterborne, but Ebola and hantavirus, which first cross over to humans from animal reservoirs, present a different challenge.
“The end of the world, the beginning of everything” is the motto of Ushuaia, Argentina, the southernmost city on the planet, where tourists flock to watch birds and embark on cruise ships. It’s the main gateway to Antarctica, making up 90 percent of all cruise departures to the continent.
It’s here that a Dutch couple may have contracted the Andes virus, the only strain of hantavirus known to spread from person to person, before sparking an outbreak on the MV Hondius. The Argentinian government’s prevailing theory is that the couple got infected while birdwatching at a landfill in Ushuaia before the cruise, coming into contact with the rodents that carry the Andes strain.
“The current theory of a couple birdwatching in southern Argentina may not be plausible, because the [long-tailed pygmy] rice rat that is responsible for spreading the Andes strain of the virus is usually found in northern Argentina or Chile, and we know the birdwatching at the landfill occurred in the southern part of Argentina,” Omer Awan, a physician and public health expert, told me over email. There have been no recorded cases of hantavirus in Tierra del Fuego province, where Ushuaia is located, before.
“Understanding the origins of the outbreak will be helpful in guiding interventions like rodent control, isolation protocols, and…how the rare Andes strain of Hantavirus is transmitted,” Awan said. “[And] identifying the source of the [2026] ebola outbreak can influence response strategy and how public health officials monitor the virus.”
Delayed detection and human movement — especially for illnesses like hantavirus and Ebola that can incubate over the course of weeks — make tracing the source of an outbreak difficult, even in the best of circumstances. We still don’t know the original source of the first Ebola outbreak in 1976, which occurred in two simultaneous waves. Debates still rage over whether Covid-19 emerged naturally through zoonotic spillover — the virus jumping from an animal host to humans — or if it potentially escaped from a lab in an accident. We know that the hantavirus and Ebola outbreaks are natural in origin, but there are still international efforts to shift the “blame” from Argentina to neighboring Chile, especially with economic interests on the line.
Such spillover events have only become more likely as humans destroy ecosystems and infringe on animal habitats. Climate change exacerbates existing infectious disease risk. “Because of our choices as a society, there’s a one-in-five chance that another pandemic will occur in the next decade that will kill at least 25 million people,” Neil Vora, the executive director of Preventing Pandemics at the Source coalition, wrote in Time Magazine.
Determining the source of outbreaks is even more difficult — and politically perilous — in the post-Covid era. The US and Argentina have pulled out of WHO. Global health funding cuts, on the part of the US as well as other countries, have weakened our biosurveillance architecture and ability to effectively respond to infectious disease.
Compared to Covid, the scale of the 2026 Bundibugyo and hantavirus outbreaks are small. It’s still proving hard to get answers. That’s going to be a serious problem whenever the next pandemic arrives — and it is a matter of when, not if.
Although we face escalating spillover risks from habitat destruction and climate change, we can’t count on the next global infectious disease threat being naturally occurring in origin when it does come.
“It’s very clear that artificial intelligence capabilities are advancing incredibly rapidly,” Jaime Yassif, senior advisor for global biological policy and programs at the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI), told me. “[That could] make it easier for novice actors to engineer pathogens that we [already] know about or for sophisticated actors to engineer novel pathogens that are more dangerous than what’s found in nature.”
If there is an outbreak of uncertain origin — where it’s unclear if it’s natural, accidental, or deliberate — we lack robust international mechanisms that can investigate the source and quickly arrive at a conclusion. That would make it harder to address the source proactively, whether that means stopping future natural spillover events, preventing lab accidents, or holding bad actors to account.
Public health professionals would need to take additional precautions if there was a risk of a deliberate outbreak, as we saw with the 2001 anthrax attacks, where letters laced with Bacillus anthracis were sent in the mail, infecting 17 people and killing five. A naturally-occurring anthrax exposure would have required a different response, since a bioterrorism investigation has to contend with the additional challenge of determining criminal responsibility.
And as we’ve seen with the debates around Covid-19 origins, suspicion that something was caused by human activity can be incredibly corrosive to international trust, making necessary geopolitical cooperation in the face of outbreaks significantly harder.
NTI identified that preparedness gap and proposed a Joint Assessment Mechanism to identify the source of outbreaks of uncertain origin. It would be housed in the UN Secretary-General’s Mechanism for Investigation of Alleged Use of Chemical and Biological Weapons (UNSGM) in order to pull together different components of the UN system and bridge security and public health.
That project (which I supported and advocated when I worked at NTI from 2022 to 2024) is currently on pause. “We still think it’s a vital gap and really important, but we just couldn’t get the political will to move it forward in the system, notwithstanding the significant support for it internationally in various quarters,” Yassif said.
We are simply unprepared domestically and internationally to prevent, detect, and respond to global infectious disease threats. Emerging infectious disease outbreaks threaten us all, and we are nowhere near where we should be in order to protect vulnerable populations and countries around the world. While the current Ebola and hantavirus outbreaks are very unlikely to become pandemics on the scale of Covid-19, they’re still dangerous and deadly. Unless we can determine where and how they began, we’ll be ill-equipped to stop them from recurring. And next time, things could be far worse.
But one of the positive things with the 15.3-inch screen is that Lenovo didn’t try to squeeze in a number pad. No, no. Just a standard keyboard layout with a centered touchpad and an adequate amount of room for your wrists. And yet, this also doesn’t feel like an overly large laptop. The width and depth dimensions are nearly identical to the 15-inch MacBook Air, and it’s only about 0.16 inches thicker. It’s definitely a backpackable and travel-worthy device.
And here’s where the remaining compromises are surprisingly few and far in-between. One of the first things I test with budget laptops is the touchpad. Cheap Windows laptops have notoriously awful touchpads, and it’s one of the important parts of a laptop that can’t be spelled out in the specs. I’m happy to report that the IdeaPad Slim 5x has a better tracking surface than most other laptops at this price. Performance is far better than on the HP OmniBook 3 or OmniBook 5. It’s certainly more responsive than the Asus Vivobook 14. I’d say it’s more or less on par with the Dell 14 Plus from last year, though that laptop has received a price increase in recent months. The sound of the click is my only real complaint about the IdeaPad Slim 5x’s touchpad. It’s too loud. I’ll take a responsive surface over a quiet click any day, but if you work in an office with coworkers, they might get annoyed by it.
Photograph: Luke Larsen
I was also surprised by how the speakers sounded. They didn’t blow me away, but compared to the average set of speakers on an average Windows laptop at this price, they’re impressive. Of course, even a 13-inch MacBook Air sounds undoubtedly fuller and bassier, but these are at least serviceable. The webcam doesn’t fare as well. It’s really only adequate in good lighting.
The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus is no M5 killer—that’s for sure. Despite improvements to the GPU this time around, the Apple M5 is still in another league. But Qualcomm is closing the gap with CPU performance, even if the M5 remains the undisputed champion. I’d say that is a bigger deal in laptops designed with performance in mind, but here, that’s not as much an issue. You aren’t buying an $850 to be a full-time video producer, AI junkie, or esports gamer. For the things the IdeaPad Slim 5x is designed for, it excels.
My normal workflow consists of juggling a full load of work apps, dozens of browser tabs, and probably some music and video streaming simultaneously. The X2 Plus didn’t skip a beat. I came away convinced that there’s more performance than what most people will even need. That’s especially impressive since the X2 Plus is a step down from the more powerful X2 Elite (or X2 Elite Enhanced), which is partially how Qualcomm and Lenovo were able to get the price down.
The display is also an aspect of this laptop that surprised me. It’s brighter and more colorful than most laptops at this price, and the addition of a touchscreen is handy. While I don’t typically like matte screens, the IdeaPad Slim 5x’s more subtle anti-glare coating made this display feel premium and clear–just without the heavy reflections.
Microsoft has finally put a date on one of its biggest upcoming games. Gears of War: E-Day will launch on October 6, 2026. It’s now set to arrive exclusively on Xbox, PC and Xbox Cloud Gaming.
The announcement came during Xbox’s Summer Game Fest showcase. It appeared alongside a new trailer packed with brutal combat, collapsing cityscapes and plenty of the series’ trademark chainsaw-fuelled action.
More importantly, it offered a closer look at the game’s setting: the infamous Emergence Day. This was when the Locust Horde first erupted onto Earth and changed humanity’s future forever.
The footage opens with a younger Marcus Fenix before he became the battle-hardened soldier fans know today. It also appears to show his first meeting with Dominic Santiago. This is setting up an origin story for one of gaming’s most iconic duos.
The biggest surprise, however, wasn’t in the trailer itself. Microsoft confirmed that E-Day is no longer heading to PS5. That’s notable given the company’s recent willingness to bring more first-party games to rival platforms. While the company plans to bring titles like Fable and Halo: Combat Evolved to PlayStation, it is keeping Gears firmly within the Xbox ecosystem.
Beyond the story, Microsoft and developer The Coalition also shared fresh technical details. Built on Unreal Engine 5, E-Day is targeting 4K resolution at 60fps during the campaign, complete with ray-traced visuals. Multiplayer modes will push even further, with support for up to 120fps.
That technical leap feels fitting for a game that’s acting as both a prequel and a modern reboot point for the franchise. Rather than continuing the current timeline, The Coalition is going back to the moment everything started. This gives newer players an easy way into the series. Additionally, it offers long-time fans a chance to see familiar characters from a different perspective.
There’s still plenty we don’t know about the campaign. However, between the return of Marcus and Dom, the focus on Emergence Day, and some ambitious performance targets, E-Day is already shaping up to be one of Xbox’s biggest exclusives of 2026.

UBTECH spent years refining full-size humanoids for factory floors and warehouse aisles. Those machines learned to move with care around people, handle precise assembly steps, and stay safe in busy production lines at places like NIO and FAW-Volkswagen plants. Now the same engineering team has turned that foundation toward regular homes through a new consumer brand called UWORLD and its first offering, the U1 series.
A recent teaser clip shows two models in a dramatic, low-light scene. One of them is dressed sharply in a cut dark suit, with well-combed light hair and glasses that catch even the smallest reflection. The other is seated comfortably in a chair, her long wavy hair framing a well-made-up face with a smooth complexion and expressive eyes. Close-ups show a subtle shine, natural-looking hair, and delicate skin texture, all thanks to a silicone exterior that closely resembles human skin.
The male model stands 183 centimeters (6 feet) tall, while the female model is 168 centimeters (5 feet 6 inches) tall. They each have 88 degrees of freedom across their bodies, allowing them to move in a very coordinated manner, including legs, arms, hands, neck, and chest. They stay connected to cloud services via Wi-Fi and last approximately 2-4 hours on a single charge. UBTECH took a deliberate approach to developing these devices, using on lessons learned from real-world industrial applications such as learning balance, gentle movement, and safe navigation in changing environments.

The idea here is to establish an emotional connection, as this is the ultimate goal. Onboard AI moderates the conversation and, in essence, wakes up when you do. It picks up on conversations even when you’re close by and uses tone, facial expressions, and speaking rate to estimate your mood. When things seem dismal, the robot can flip to encouraging banter or try to steer things in a more positive direction. When the mood is right, it enjoys joining in and talking normally. Personal memory is encrypted on the device to keep your conversations secret. Owners can modify cosmetic elements and character qualities at any time, allowing each robot to develop an own personality over time.
JD.com opened pre-orders on June 2, with a 3,000 yuan deposit required to secure a spot in the initial batch, which got over 2,000 reservations in just a day or two. Shipments to clients who ordered early will arrive in mid-September. A full public presentation is expected for June 30, at which UBTECH will discuss final pricing, particular features, and any software updates planned after launch. We’re still waiting for the final retail price, but it appears that this device will be more affordable than a high-end enterprise system.

Their physical abilities are reportedly limited, as in they can get up, sit, and move over flat indoor surfaces using taught gait patterns, but stairs, rough terrain, or tough household tasks are out of the question for now. According to UBTECH, these units will not accept custom programming or behaviors, preventing owners from configuring them to perform new functions on the fly. The emphasis is on communication, with some incremental personalization on the side, as these devices will not be used to retrieve mail or perform chores anytime soon.
[Source]
Italian fashion house Prada “unveiled on Sunday the inner-layer garment set to be worn by NASA astronauts heading to the moon,” reports Reuters.
“The body-hugging suit, created in collaboration with Houston-based space infrastructure developer Axiom Space, features ventilation tubes knitted into the garment.”
Expertise for developing space exploration products “can come from lots of seemingly unrelated industries,” said Jonathan Cirtain, CEO of Axiom Space… The new product follows Prada’s splashy foray into space fashion in 2024 with the unveiling of a spacesuit that is expected to be used for NASA’s anticipated Artemis 4 moon landing in 2028…
Other fashion and apparel companies have jumped on the space bandwagon. Under Armour has partnered with spaceflight company Virgin Galactic to create space apparel, while Columbia Sportswear has worked with space exploration company Intuitive Machines on space fabric technology.
The new “Liquid Cooling and Ventilation Garment” was displayed on a mannequin at an event at Prada’s Manhattan store.
Weekend Open Thread: Evereve – Corporette.com
Jade Biosciences, Inc. (JBIO) Discusses Positive Interim Results From JADE101 Phase I Healthy Volunteer Study and Development Plans Transcript
Jensen Huang Approves Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron for NVIDIA (NVDA) HBM4 Memory Supply
French Open 2026 results: Alexander Zverev beats Rafael Jodar and will play Jakub Mensik in semi-finals
CryZENx Releases Fresh Playable Content Deep Inside Jabu-Jabu for His Ocarina of Time Remake
Trump Taps Housing Chief Bill Pulte as Acting Intelligence Director After Gabbard Exit
The Pain Points Taking a Fragile Tech Rally Down a Notch
Republicans balk at Trump’s attempt to appoint a MAGA enforcer to lead National Intelligence
LBank Surpasses 25 Million Users Worldwide as AFA Partnership Continues to Drive Global Growth
RCS Messages Between iPhone and Android Get End-to-End Encryption With iOS 26.5
Microsoft launches MXC, an OS-level sandbox for AI agents, with OpenAI and Nvidia already on board
Seagate (STX) Stock Surges to Record High on AI Boom and Legal Settlement
Trump’s AI Ownership Plan Could Benefit Anthropic at OpenAI’s Expense
Meta steals a tactic from Tesla and builds data centers in tents
(VIDEO) Justin Bieber Delivers Surprise Happy Birthday Serenade to Diners at Los Angeles Mexican Restaurant
EU AI Data Center Project Faces Delays as Funding Gaps Grow
Did The Mandalorian And Grogu Already Ruin The Next Star Wars Movie?
Aehr Test Systems Stock Soars 17% Amid Surging AI Demand and Conference Spotlight
Merlin (MRLN) Stock Soars 32% on Major USSOCOM Autonomy Milestone
Claude AI Down Today Reason: Why Anthropic’s AI is not working today? What’s the latest quota update
You must be logged in to post a comment Login