Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Crypto World

Why a hidden math metric shows bitcoin may be getting too cheap for investors to ignore

Published

on

Bitcoin's MVRV Z-score. (TradingView)

After a massive selloff last week, one of bitcoin’s closely watched onchain metrics is approaching a threshold that has historically marked bear market bottoms.

The metric is called the market value-to-realized value (MVRV) Z-Score. Every major bitcoin cycle bottom has coincided with the Z-Score touching or briefly dipping below zero (into the green zone, in the chart).

Bitcoin's MVRV Z-score. (TradingView)

And right now, it is knocking on the door of the zone that has coincided with the lowest point of previous bear markets. It happened in 2011-2012 when bitcoin saw its first major crash. It happened again in 2014 and late 2018. Most recently, it fell below zero in the second half of 2022, marking a price bottom that paved the way for a three-year bull run.

What is the MVRV Z-Score

The metric compares the deviation of bitcoin’s market value – what the token is worth right now based on the current market price – from it’s realized price.

The second figure, widely considered close to fair value, is obtained by averaging the prices of every bitcoin since the last time it was transacted onchain.

Advertisement

When the market price is far above fair value, bitcoin is considered expensive relative to its own history. When the market price falls toward or below the fair value, bitcoin is cheap. The Z-Score takes the difference between those two numbers and measures how extreme it is statistically.

The result is a single line that cuts through the noise of day-to-day price action and shows where the price is relative to the broader market cycle. A high Z-Score means the market is running hot, and a low or below-zero score means the opposite.

According to BitBo, the Z-Score is currently at 0.24, just above the upper boundary of the historically significant “green zone,” which begins at approximately 0 and extends slightly below zero.

In other words, it’s very close to the “accumulation” zone. To be clear, this is not a price level, but only a measure of how stretched or compressed bitcoin’s market value is relative to its realized value.

Advertisement

Absolute bottom?

However, the bottom might not be in just yet, as the behavior of wallet holders suggests there might still be a bit more selling needed for it to be truly in.

Onchain data suggests that Long-Term Holder MVRV (LTH-MVRV), which measures the profitability of coins held for at least 155 days, and Short-Term Holder MVRV (STH-MVRV), which focuses on coins held for less than 155 days, haven’t converged yet.

When these two data points close the gap, historically, a major cycle low forms. This was previously seen in 2015, 2019, and 2022.

LTH/STH MVRV (Glassnode)

However, currently, STH-MVRV stands at 0.84, while LTH-MVRV remains elevated at 1.29. Meaning long-term holders are still sitting on relatively large unrealized profits, indicating that further downside in bitcoin may be required before a typical bear market bottom is established.

While it is impossible to time market bottoms, after the brutal selling last week that wiped hundreds of billions off crypto’s market value, conditions that have historically preceded recoveries are beginning to emerge.

Advertisement

Read more: Bitcoin, ether eye worst weekly rout since FTX collapse as cryptos shed $390 billion

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

MetaMask rolls out AI wallet designed for swaps, perps, and onchain finance

Published

on

MetaMask rolls out AI wallet designed for swaps, perps, and onchain finance

MetaMask has launched an early access version of Agent Wallet, a new non-custodial product that allows AI agents to execute crypto transactions under user-defined controls across Ethereum-compatible networks and Hyperliquid.

Summary

  • MetaMask has launched Agent Wallet, allowing AI agents to execute trades, swaps, and other on-chain transactions under user-defined controls.
  • Every transaction is simulated and screened by Blockaid, with risky activity requiring additional user approval before execution.

According to a press release shared with crypto.news, the wallet is designed for autonomous agents that can carry out tasks such as token swaps, perpetual futures trading, liquidity provisioning, and prediction market activity without requiring manual input for every step.

The launch places MetaMask among a growing list of crypto companies building tools for AI-powered finance. Over recent months, firms across the sector have introduced products that let AI systems interact with wallets, trading platforms, and payment networks while keeping final authority with human users.

Advertisement

Joe Lubin, founder of Consensys, said crypto infrastructure is well suited for machine-driven transactions because autonomous software can coordinate and verify activity through blockchain networks.

“Agents will manage real capital and make real financial decisions, and the infrastructure underneath has to be worthy of that. MetaMask Agent Wallet is the first agent wallet built with comprehensive full stack security for that world: one where agents act with autonomy, security is mandatory, and the person behind the agent stays in control.” – Joe Lubin, Founder and CEO of Consensys and Co-Founder of Ethereum.

Security controls remain central to rollout

Built around preset permissions, Agent Wallet requires users to establish spending limits, approved transaction lists, and other operating rules before an AI agent can access funds, according to Consensys.

Advertisement

Every transaction must first pass through a simulation process that checks the expected outcome before execution. Consensys said the wallet also integrates security monitoring from Blockaid, which scans transactions for potential scams and suspicious activity.

Where a transaction falls outside a user’s predefined rules or is considered risky, Blockaid can trigger a two-factor authentication request through email or push notification before execution proceeds.

The announcement further added that MetaMask’s Transaction Protection program will cover eligible transactions deemed safe by the platform for up to $10,000, subject to applicable terms and conditions.

AI wallet race gains momentum

Support for Agent Wallet extends across several AI development environments, including OpenClaw, OpenAI Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, and Nous Research Hermes Agent. Consensys said the product is framework agnostic and can work with different agent architectures.

Advertisement

For now, access is limited to a small group of users through a command-line interface as part of an Early Access Program. A wider rollout is expected later this summer, according to the company.

Elsewhere in the industry, crypto firms have increasingly connected wallets and payment systems to AI agents. Gemini has introduced tools that let users connect AI trading bots to exchange accounts, while card issuers and wallet providers have explored dedicated financial accounts for autonomous software.

A similar approach emerged in May when Base introduced Base MCP, a system that connects AI agents with Base Accounts. According to Base, the tool lets users conduct transfers, swaps, portfolio tracking, and other onchain actions through chat interfaces while requiring explicit user approval before any transaction is signed.

Base said its MCP system supports ChatGPT, Claude, Codex, and Cursor, and integrates with decentralized finance applications including Uniswap, Morpho, Moonwell, Aerodrome, and Avantis. The company maintained that private keys remain inaccessible to AI agents, with transaction approval staying under user control.

Advertisement

Security concerns have continued to accompany the rise of agent-based crypto products. In a recent report, researchers from Google, Meta, Gray Swan AI, EmbraceTheRed, and several universities argued that AI agents should be treated as untrusted components and separated from sensitive systems and instructions.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Strategy Bought more Bitcoin as Tom Lee Scooped more ETH in the Bloodbath Aftermath: Bull Run Making a Comeback?

Published

on

Strategy Bitcoin buying spree is back after a brutal week, and Tom Lee’s BitMine mirrored the aggression. Is bull run coming back?

Strategy Bitcoin buying spree is back after a brutal week. Michael Saylor added 1,550 BTC for $101 million between June 1 and 7 at an average of $65,332 per coin, lifting its total to 845,256 BTC while boosting USD reserves to $1 billion. The move came just days after a tiny 32 BTC sale triggered chaos, proving these Bitcoin accumulators refuse to blink in the dip.

Strategy Bitcoin buying spree is back after a brutal week, and Tom Lee’s BitMine mirrored the aggression. Is bull run coming back?
Strategy’s SEC Filing, SEC

Last week, Strategy sold just 32 BTC at $77,135 each to cover preferred stock dividends, its first Bitcoin sale since 2022. The last time Strategy sold in 2022 was marked as the Bitcoin bottom. But the move, a mere 0.0038 percent of holdings, was followed by liquidation cascades that hammered Bitcoin from $77,000 below $60,000.

The community screamed that the “never sell” mantra is broken, and Saylor stayed silent until the dust settled. Was Saylor a genius? He sold high enough to fund obligations, watched the cascade he arguably ignited, then scooped 1,550 BTC at an $12,000 lower average. It gave the company an additional 1,518 BTC and $100 million in cash.

Strategy Bitcoin per share keeps rising while the market panics. It’s a classic playbook. However, both Strategy and Bitmine still sit deep underwater. Strategy’s average cost basis sits at $75,680 per BTC. At current levels near $65,000, unrealized losses top $9 billion. In early 2026, it peaked above $80,000 delivered billions in paper profits before the slide.

Bitcoin (BTC)
24h7d30d1yAll time

Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio with

Advertisement

The Other Bull: Tom Lee’s ETH

Tom Lee’s BitMine Immersion Technologies mirrored the aggression as the firm bought 126,971 ETH for $213 million during the same dip, with ETH around $1,670. Bitmine’s total holdings now hit 5.54 million ETH, or 4.59% of supply, with over 85 percent staked on its MAVAN platform. The staked ETH itself is projected to print $270 million in annual rewards.

Bitcoin (BTC)
24h7d30d1yAll time

Just before the bloodbath, Tom Lee said that we are in a “crypto spring.” Then he labeled Strategy’s 32 BTC sale a bottom signal and kept buying aggressively. BitMine’s average cost sits way higher at $3,460 per ETH. At $1,681 today, unrealized losses approach $9.9 billion. Yet staking yields provide a buffer Strategy lacks with its Bitcoin.

Both companies’ mechanisms diverge sharply. Strategy Bitcoin relies on equity offerings, convertible notes, and cash flow to fund pure BTC holdings. It has no staking, no yield, just diamond hands and “Bitcoin per share” growth. BitMine blends treasury buys with massive staking operations for steady ETH rewards.

Discover: The best pre-launch token sales

Which Company is Walking in Tight Rope? Strategy with Its Bitcoin? Or Lee’s Ethereum Bag?

If crypto falls further, Strategy looks more dangerous. Its model ties funding to stock performance and debt service. A prolonged drawdown could force dilution or tighter liquidity squeezes, as the 32 BTC sale already showed. BitMine’s staking income offers a downside cushion even if prices tank.

Advertisement

What happened last week crystallized the difference. One tiny sale from the BTC kingpin rippled across markets. ETH treasury players like BitMine absorbed the volatility and kept stacking. Both proved institutional conviction remains intact despite the bloody chart.

These back-to-back mega buys in the bloodbath aftermath show smart money sees value. Liquidation cascades cleared weak lettuce hands. Fresh capital from equity raises flowed straight into digital assets. Expect volatility but upward bias.

Strategy and BitMine are rewriting corporate balance sheets as crypto-native vehicles. Their scale and discipline set the floor during fear.

Advertisement

The path forward looks clear. With Saylor and Lee refusing to fold, retail and institutions will follow the leaders. Crypto spring is thawing into full bloom.

Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio with

The post Strategy Bought more Bitcoin as Tom Lee Scooped more ETH in the Bloodbath Aftermath: Bull Run Making a Comeback? appeared first on Cryptonews.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

The Next Yield Meta: Revenue Sharing vs Token Emissions

Published

on

The Next Yield Meta: Revenue Sharing vs Token Emissions

Are Emissions Finally Dying? For years, crypto investors chased one thing above all else: yield.

Protocols compete by offering eye-catching APYs, often paying users with newly minted tokens. Liquidity flooded in. TVL exploded. Communities celebrated.

Then reality arrived.

As token emissions increased, prices often moved in the opposite direction. Rewards that looked attractive on paper became less valuable as inflation diluted holders and sell pressure mounted.

Now, a new narrative is gaining momentum across DeFi:

Advertisement

Revenue Sharing. Real Yield. Sustainable Value.

The question is no longer how much yield a protocol can offer.

The question is whether that yield comes from real economic activity.

The Old Model: Inflationary Token Rewards

Token emissions powered the first generation of DeFi growth.

Advertisement

Protocols distributed newly created tokens to users who:

  • Provided liquidity
  • Staked assets
  • Borrowed and lent funds
  • Participated in governance

This model worked remarkably well in attracting capital.

A protocol offering 100% APY could quickly attract millions in deposits.

But there was a hidden problem.

Most of the yield wasn’t coming from revenue.

Advertisement

It was coming from inflation.

Imagine a protocol generating $100,000 in annual fees while issuing $10 million worth of new tokens to incentivize users.

The rewards appeared attractive, but the economic foundation was weak.

As recipients sold their rewards, the token supply expanded and prices declined.

Advertisement

This created a cycle:

  1. Protocol emits tokens.
  2. Users farm rewards.
  3. Users sell rewards.
  4. Token price falls.
  5. Protocol increases emissions to maintain attractiveness.
  6. More selling pressure emerges.

Many DeFi projects entered what became known as the “yield death spiral.”

The rewards were real.

The value often wasn’t.

The Rise of Real Yield

As markets matured, investors began demanding something different.

Advertisement

Instead of asking:

“How much yield does this protocol pay?”

They started asking:

“Where does the yield come from?”

Advertisement

This shift gave birth to the Real Yield movement.

Real Yield refers to rewards generated from actual protocol revenue rather than token inflation.

Sources may include:

  • Trading fees
  • Borrowing fees
  • Platform commissions
  • Liquidation fees
  • Infrastructure revenue
  • Subscription models

In this model, users receive a share of the value created by genuine network activity.

The protocol becomes more like a business generating cash flow than a token-printing machine.

Advertisement

Revenue Sharing: Aligning Users With Protocol Success

Revenue-sharing models distribute a portion of protocol earnings directly to token holders or stakers.

This creates a powerful alignment.

When protocol usage grows:

  • Revenue increases
  • Rewards increase
  • Demand for the token may increase
  • Long-term holders benefit

Unlike emissions, the rewards are tied directly to economic performance.

This encourages users to think like owners rather than short-term farmers.

Advertisement

Instead of asking:

“How fast can I sell my rewards?”

Participants begin asking:

“How much revenue can this protocol generate over the next five years?”

Advertisement

That’s a fundamentally different mindset.

Buyback-and-Burn: Creating Scarcity

Another emerging model is the buyback-and-burn mechanism.

Rather than distributing revenue directly, protocols use earnings to purchase tokens from the open market.

Those tokens are then permanently removed from circulation.

Advertisement

The process creates two potential benefits:

1. Continuous Buy Pressure

Protocol revenue becomes a recurring source of demand.

As usage increases, buybacks may increase as well.

2. Reduced Supply

Burning tokens decreases the circulating supply over time.

Advertisement

If demand remains stable or grows, scarcity can strengthen token economics.

This model has become increasingly popular because it rewards holders without creating additional taxable distributions in some jurisdictions and can simplify token value accrual.

Why Investors Are Paying Attention

The shift toward revenue-backed value isn’t happening by accident.

Crypto investors are becoming more sophisticated.

Advertisement

Many now evaluate protocols using metrics traditionally associated with businesses:

  • Revenue growth
  • Fee generation
  • Profitability
  • User retention
  • Cash flow
  • Capital efficiency

A protocol generating millions in fees may deserve a premium valuation compared to one relying solely on emissions.

The market is slowly moving from speculation toward fundamentals.

Not entirely.

But noticeably.

Advertisement

The Challenges of Revenue Sharing

Despite its advantages, revenue sharing is not a perfect solution.

Several risks remain:

Lower Initial Growth

Emission incentives can rapidly bootstrap liquidity and adoption.

Revenue-sharing models may grow more slowly.

Advertisement

Regulatory Questions

Direct profit-sharing mechanisms may attract greater regulatory scrutiny in certain jurisdictions.

Revenue Dependence

If protocol activity declines, rewards decline as well.

Sustainability depends on continued user demand.

Competitive Pressure

Protocols must continue innovating to maintain fee generation.

Advertisement

Revenue today does not guarantee revenue tomorrow.

What the Next Yield Meta Might Look Like

The future may not be emissions versus revenue sharing.

The winning protocols could combine both.

A balanced framework might include:

Advertisement
  • Limited emissions for early growth
  • Revenue sharing for long-term retention
  • Buyback-and-burn mechanisms for value accrual
  • Sustainable tokenomics focused on utility

Instead of endlessly printing tokens, protocols may increasingly reward participants through actual economic output.

This represents a major evolution in how DeFi creates value.

Final Thoughts

The era of emissions-driven growth is not completely over.

Token incentives remain an effective tool for bootstrapping networks and attracting liquidity.

But the market is becoming less willing to reward inflation for inflation’s sake.

Advertisement

Investors increasingly want evidence that a protocol can generate real revenue, create sustainable demand, and return value to participants without relying on perpetual token issuance.

Revenue sharing, buyback-and-burn mechanisms, and Real Yield models are all responses to that demand.

The next generation of DeFi winners may not be the protocols offering the highest APY.

They may be the protocols generating the most genuine economic value.

Advertisement

And if that trend continues, the biggest yield opportunity in crypto won’t come from token emissions.

It will come from owning a share of the revenue-producing networks of the future.

REQUEST AN ARTICLE

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

This startup wants to reduce payment friction on prediction markets

Published

on

Companies keep investing in prediction markets despite legal battle

In this photo illustration, Apps for online prediction market sites are shown on an electronic device on Feb. 25, 2026 in Chicago, Illinois.

Scott Olson | Getty Images

As prediction market volumes continue to march higher and platforms increasingly look to institutional players to engage, a startup is seeking to make it easier to move money around on event contract exchanges.

Advertisement

EDGE Markets — which runs a banking platform designed for gambling and prediction market spending — is set to debut two products, the company shared exclusively with CNBC ahead of a Monday announcement. It will also reveal a $29.2 million Series A funding round, led by venture capital firm CoinFund. 

The company will announce EDGE Connect, a real-time payments system to reduce the time it takes for individual traders to transfer funds from their bank accounts into wallets on prediction market exchanges.

Users get access to EDGE Connect if they use EDGE Boost, a financial platform that only allows deposits to be used for spending on gambling and prediction markets. CEO Seni Thomas told CNBC in an interview that EDGE Connect is currently available on Kalshi, and that the company is actively working to implement the technology on five other platforms in the coming months. 

Kalshi confirmed to CNBC the partnership with EDGE. 

Advertisement

“We have 24-hour markets… and you can’t get money in at the same velocity,” Thomas said. “Any one of our users can sign into our consumer bank accounts and actually push out up to $10 million per day, and it hits your Kalshi account within two minutes.”

The company is also announcing EDGE Pro, a platform that will serve as a hub for institutional market makers to easily move money between various prediction markets regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Pro will launch to a waitlist as EDGE awaits regulatory approvals from the National Futures Association.

Thomas said that Pro solves a unique issue that institutional traders face in the prediction market space.

“You’re going to now have 10 different liquidity pools, actually offering very similar contracts,” he said. “You need to have a very, very fast infrastructure to be able to kind of move all that in real time.” 

Advertisement

EDGE Markets was founded in 2020 by Thomas and then launched EDGE Boost in March 2025. Boost has processed over $2 billion in transactions since then. 

“The biggest moments in gaming and prediction markets happen on nights and weekends, exactly when the banking system slows to a crawl. EDGE built the rails to match that reality,” Alex Felix, a managing partner at CoinFund, said in a statement. “We think EDGE becomes the default settlement layer for an entirely new category of financial markets.”

Disclosure: CNBC and Kalshi have a commercial relationship that includes customer acquisition and a minority investment.

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Ripple Price Analysis: Is XRP Ready for a Comeback After Reclaiming Major Support?

Published

on

XRP remains under pressure on higher timeframes after extending its decline within a broad descending channel. However, the asset is now attempting to stabilize above an important support region while showing early signs of recovery against Bitcoin. The coming sessions could determine whether it can establish a meaningful bottom or continue its longer-term downtrend.

Ripple Price Analysis: The USDT Pair

On the daily timeframe, XRP has recently broken below the local support around $1.30 and quickly dropped into a major demand zone between $1.10 and $1.20. This region has historically attracted buyers and once again produced a reaction, with the price rebounding after briefly dipping below the lower boundary of the zone.

Despite the bounce, the broader market structure remains bearish. XRP continues to trade inside a long-term descending channel while remaining below both the 100-day moving average at approximately $1.35 and the 200-day moving average near $1.60. The bearish alignment of these moving averages suggests that sellers still maintain control of the higher-timeframe trend.

For the buyers, the first challenge is reclaiming the 100-day MA and turning the $1.35-$1.40 region into support. A successful recovery above that area could open the door for a move toward the next major resistance zone around $1.80.

Advertisement

On the downside, failure to hold the current support between could expose the channel’s lower boundary and potentially trigger another leg lower. Meanwhile, the RSI has recovered from near-oversold conditions and currently sits around 33, indicating that bearish momentum has eased slightly, although no strong bullish reversal signal has emerged yet.

The BTC Pair

Against Bitcoin, XRP appears to be showing more constructive price action after several months of underperformance. The pair recently found support near 1,700 sats and has since produced a series of higher lows, suggesting that selling pressure may be weakening.

The price is currently trading around the 1,820 SAT region, which coincides with an important resistance area and sits just beneath the declining 100-day moving average. A decisive breakout above this zone could strengthen the recovery narrative and allow XRP to target the next resistance area around 2,000 sats, where the 200-day moving average is also located.

The broader trend, nevertheless, remains negative, as the pair is still trading inside a long-term descending channel and below both the 100-day and 200-day moving averages. As a result, any bullish continuation will likely require a sustained break above the 1,850 sats resistance cluster.

Advertisement

Moreover, the RSI on the BTC pair has improved notably and is hovering near the neutral 55 level, reflecting strengthening momentum compared to the USDT chart. As long as XRP holds above the 1,700 sat support, the probability of an extension toward higher resistance levels remains elevated. However, a breakdown below that floor would invalidate the recent recovery structure and shift focus toward the lower channel support near 1,500 sats.

The post Ripple Price Analysis: Is XRP Ready for a Comeback After Reclaiming Major Support? appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Best Exchanges to Trade Oil With Crypto in 2026: The Complete Guide

Published

on

The crypto industry isn’t what it was a few years ago. I remember when I started, there were a handful of exchanges – all centralized- and nobody would ever consider that buying stocks or commodities on them was even possible. Well, that’s not the case anymore. Tokenization is now a major part of the field, and trading commodities such as oil is not only possible but also generates billions in trading volume every single day.

As blockchain infrastructure evolves, traders in 2026 can access oil markets through tokenized assets and decentralized platforms without relying on conventional brokers.

In the following, I will walk you through everything you need to know about trading oil with crypto – starting from the exchanges you can use, a step-by-step tutorial on how to use them, their fees, pros, cons, differences, and more.

Main Takeaways:

  • Trading oil with crypto typically provides synthetic exposure to crude oil via perpetual futures.
  • Most of the products are settled in stablecoins like USDC and USDT.
  • You can trade oil with crypto on both centralized and decentralized exchanges.
  • The best platform will depend on your preference.
  • Hyperliquid, Binance, and Bybit are amongst the best options.

Understanding the Link Between Oil Markets and Cryptocurrency

The connection between oil markets and cryptocurrency has strengthened and become more pronounced as multiple digital asset platforms expand beyond spot trading into derivatives and real-world asset (RWA) exposure.

Traditionally, oil trading has been largely dominated by futures contracts on regulated exchanges. Now, however, crypto infrastructure has evolved to enable similar exposure through tokenized alternatives. Instead of holding physical barrels of oil or using legacy brokers, traders can speculate on oil prices using crypto-collateralized perpetual contracts that mirror crude oil benchmarks such as Brent or WTI.

Advertisement

In fact, several major platforms have already accelerated this process. Most famously, the popular decentralized perpetual contracts exchange Hyperliquid quickly became the preferred place to trade oil during the weekend when the war between the US, Israel, and Iran started. It remains a preferred platform for trading tokenized oil, with billions in open interest within weeks.

Centralized exchanges are also becoming increasingly popular. Binance, for example, offers oil-linked derivatives that function much like traditional oil futures but are settled in crypto. Bybit has also introduced trading interfaces that bridge traditional finance concepts and digital assets, allowing users to gain exposure to commodities such as crude oil alongside crypto markets.

In any case, this evolution reflects a broader trend: cryptocurrency exchanges are quickly becoming multi-asset trading venues. Oil, as one of the most liquid commodities in the world, is nothing but a natural extension.

It’s worth noting, though, that the link remains synthetic rather than physical – the prices are derived from external markets, and the positions are usually settled in stablecoins or other cryptocurrencies.

Advertisement

Best Exchanges to Trade Oil With Crypto: Detailed Comparison for 2026

.cp-only-mobile{display:none}
@media(max-width:720px){
.cp .table .price .cp-only-mobile{display:inline;font-weight:600;margin-right:.25rem}
}

Name Features Rating
Hyperliquid
Hyperliquid
Top DEX
  • Pioneered oil-linked derivatives via HIP-3
  • Captures over 90% of DEX market share
  • Features on-chain settlement and funding rates

4.8/5
Binance
Binance
Best CEX
  • Direct exposure to Crude and Brent oil
  • Offers up to 100x maximum leverage
  • Zero learning curve for derivatives traders

4.7/5
Bybit
Bybit
Multi-Asset
  • Dedicated TradFi service for commodities
  • Seamlessly bridges crypto and traditional markets
  • Includes mobile access and advanced trading tools

4.6/5

I have to divide this section into two categories: decentralized and centralized exchanges that feature oil-linked products tradable with stablecoins.

For years, the consensus has been that centralized exchanges are easier to use, but, to be honest, Hyperliquid comes very close to that experience without requiring you to custody your funds with them. This will be reflected in my following review.

Decentralized Exchanges

Hyperliquid: Best for On-Chain Derivatives Traders

Advertisement
Rating:

4.8/5
  • Non-stop decentralized commodity trading
  • Complete self-custody with wallet execution
  • Ideal for advanced DeFi derivatives users
  • Potential smart contract and oracle issues
  • Steeper learning curve for newcomers
  • External ecosystem builders run the markets

Hyperliquid is the largest decentralized cryptocurrency exchange by far, capturing over 90% of the DEX market share for perpetual futures trading. It also pioneered oil-linked derivatives after they launched HIP-3 on mainnet. For a long time, it was the only place where users could trade OIL contracts using crypto, even on weekends, making it a valuable instrument for price discovery during times of military conflict in the Middle East.

Advertisement

So, yes, Hyperliquid treats crude as a 24/7 on-chain perpetual market. Instead of going through a traditional commodity broker, users can post crypto collateral and take long or short exposure to oil-linked contracts.

In my opinion, this is the most crypto-native experience of the three – you get wallet-backed access, on-chain settlement, perpetual futures, funding rates, and continuous trading all at once.

Of course, centralized venues eventually caught on, but Hyperliquid accounts for a huge portion of the trading volume and for a good reason. Of course, there are some drawbacks. Hyperliquid is not a regulated commodity exchange (but neither are Binance or Bybit).  The onboarding experience for non-crypto users can be a bit intimidating, because they would have to set up a wallet and bridge funds to the exchange – something that many people might find scary. However, if you have connected a wallet to any Web3 dApp before, you will experience no problems whatsoever.

Now, it’s worth noting that the markets available on Hyperliquid are deployed by 3rd-party firms, who build on top of the exchange’s infrastructure – that’s what their builder codes program is for. That said, this also suggests these companies support the markets, meaning that the Hyperliquid team isn’t responsible for them.

Advertisement

Presently, the teams offering oil-linked perps on Hyperliquid include:

  • WTIOIL-USDC (By trade.xyz)
  • BRENTOIL-USDC (by trade.xyz)
  • USOIL-USDH (by Kinetiq)
  • OIL-USDH (by Felix)

Together, they account for close to $1 billion in daily trading volume.

Pros: 

  • Fully crypto-native oil trading experience
  • Wallet-based access without using a broker or a custody service
  • 24/7 trading
  • Strong fit for experienced on-chain derivatives traders

Cons: 

  • Oracle and infrastructure risk are part of the trading environment
  • Less beginner-friendly
  • Third-party providers for the markets themselves

Centralized Exchanges

Binance: Best for Existing Binance Futures Users

Advertisement
Rating:

4.7/5
  • Identical interface to standard crypto futures
  • Deep liquidity and robust learning tools
  • Effortless deployment of existing stablecoin balances
  • Geographic access limitations
  • Requires trusting a centralized party with assets

Binance offers direct exposure to crude and Brent oil prices through its derivatives platform, Binance Futures. The pairs are:

Advertisement
  • CLUSDT for Crude Oil
  • BZUSDT for Brent Oil

Now, the convenience here is rather evident – Binance is the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange with millions of daily active users. These traders now have a way to gain exposure to oil perpetual future contracts right at their fingertips. The trading experience is exactly the same as for cryptocurrency derivatives, and there is literally no learning curve.

Trading is 24/7, and maximum leverage is currently set at 100x.

Pros: 

  • Familiar platform for existing crypto traders
  • Strong ecosystem, wallet infrastructure and educational resources
  • Convenient for users who already hold stablecoins on Binance

Cons: 

  • Product availability can vary by region
  • Users have to custody their funds with Binance

Bybit: Best for Multi-Asset Crypto Traders

Advertisement
Rating:

4.6/5
  • Quick stablecoin-settled oil exposure
  • Streamlined system combining crypto and TradFi
  • Advanced features with mobile accessibility
  • Restricted in certain jurisdictions
  • Requires close tracking of overnight swap charges

Bybit is a direct option for trading oil with crypto. Just like Binance, it’s well-suited for people who already use the platform to trade cryptocurrencies.

Advertisement

The exchange offers a TradFi service, enabling trading of WTI and Brent oil using USDT. It gives the experience a very familiar structure for crypto derivatives traders.

I have found this model easy to understand, and it’s clear that centralized exchanges are expanding into stocks and commodities in a way that doesn’t disconnect users from their existing experience.

The main strength in that is convenience. Bybit bridges crypto balances and traditional markets without requiring a separate commodities broker. The platform also offers mobile access and advanced tools.

Pros:

Advertisement
  • Uses USDT, which is convenient for crypto traders
  • Familiar derivatives-style trading interface
  • Useful for traders who want crypto, commodities, and other markets in one account

Cons: 

  • Regional restrictions may apply
  • Spreads, commissions, and overnight/swap fees require your close attention

Fees and Costs

Fees vary widely across the platforms I’ve chosen to review. They can also change based on account tier, trading volume, region, and market conditions.

In general, I strongly suggest that you look beyond the headline-maker-and-taker fee. You should consider funding rates, spreads, slippage, withdrawal fees, bridging costs, and any commissions or overnight costs before settling down on an exchange.

The following table attempts to simplify your choice:

.binance-dark-container-inline * {
box-sizing: border-box !important;
}

.binance-dark-container-inline table,
.binance-dark-container-inline table * {
margin: 0 !important;
padding: 0;
}

Advertisement

.binance-dark-container-inline table {
border: none !important;
border-spacing: 0 !important;
max-width: 100% !important;
}

.binance-dark-container-inline table tbody tr:hover {
background: #1f2937 !important;
}

Platform Trading fees Funding costs Extra costs to watch
Hyperliquid Volume-based perp fees Hourly funding Bridge costs, slippage, oracle risk, third-party market risk
Binance Maker/taker futures fees, VIP-based Perpetual funding payments Spread, slippage, withdrawal fees, regional restrictions
Bybit TradFi commissions or USDT perp-style fees, depending on product Perpetual funding where applicable Spread, commissions, VIP tier, contract-specific costs

Why Traders Are Using Crypto Platforms to Trade Oil

If you’ve traded commodities – you know, oil has traditionally been traded through brokers, futures exchanges, CFDs, and other conventional financial platforms. For many crypto traders, these routes can feel slow. I know when I was setting up my brokerage account, I had to go through lengthy administrative procedures – something that I just don’t have to deal with to that extent when trading on a crypto-native platform.

And let’s face it – you are highly unlikely to trade in physical oil, so derivatives is likely to be what you’re looking for. That said, here are some advantages I like about trading oil with crypto.

Advertisement

24/7 Market Access

This is undoubtedly why many traders use crypto platforms for oil exposure, because they provide around-the-clock access. Traditional oil futures tend to follow exchange trading hours, while many crypto-native markets are designed to operate continuously. This can be very attractive, and it is to me, especially during holidays, weekends, or periods of geopolitical tension, when oil-related news may break while traditional markets are closed.

Trading with Stablecoins

If you already use it, then chances are you are holding some stablecoins, or at least trade against them. With all of the above trading platforms, you can trade oil directly with your stablecoins.

They also make the experience feel familiar, which I will touch upon a bit later, but for now – know that you can post collateral, open long or short positions, monitor profit and loss, and settle trades in dollar-denominated stablecoins like USDT or USDC.

No Brokers Required

Crypto platforms can reduce (I’m not saying they will entirely replace it) the need for a separate commodities broker.

Advertisement

For those of you who already trade crypto, this removes a whole lot of friction. You won’t need to open new accounts with a legacy brokerage, get used to a new interface, or move capital between different financial platforms.

As you can already imagine, this is particularly appealing for crypto-native users.

Familiar Trading Experience

Oil-linked products on crypto exchanges resemble the perpetual futures markets that most of you might already be familiar with. If not, they are basically tailored to regular users with plenty of quality-of-life upgrades. This is especially true for centralized exchanges, which basically hold your hand throughout the entire setup process.

Now, these are just some of the benefits, but others include:

Advertisement
  • Access during high-volatility events
  • One account for multiple markets
  • Ability to trade both directions, and more.

Key Risks of Trading Oil With Crypto

Most of the risks present in all sorts of perpetual futures are also inherently present in oil trading with crypto. Namely, these include:

  • Market volatility
  • Leverage and liquidation risk
  • Funding rate risk
  • Liquidity and slippage risk
  • Platform and custody risk

However, there are a few specifics I should address.

Oracle and Pricing Risk

Crypto-based oil markets rely on external price feeds, for the most part, including index calculations or various oracle systems designed to track benchmarks such as Brent or WTI. If the oracle is delayed, inaccurate, manipulated, or temporarily disconnected from the underlying market, traders may face unexpected pricing issues.

Now, it’s hard to say if this risk is present more with decentralized or centralized exchanges, since both types (even the large names) have experienced them at some point in the past, but it’s one that you should keep into account if you’ve decided to tap into crypto-based oil trading.

Decentralized vs Centralized Platforms: Comparison Table

I can’t recommend a single best option for every trader. The truth is that decentralized platforms and centralized exchanges come with different trade-offs, and the right choice largely depends on your experience level, custody preferences, and risk tolerance.

Here’s a summarized table that will help you in your choice:

Advertisement

.binance-dark-container-inline * {
box-sizing: border-box !important;
}

.binance-dark-container-inline table,
.binance-dark-container-inline table * {
margin: 0 !important;
padding: 0;
}

.binance-dark-container-inline table {
border: none !important;
border-spacing: 0 !important;
max-width: 100% !important;
}

.binance-dark-container-inline table tbody tr:hover {
background: #1f2937 !important;
}

Advertisement
Category Decentralized Platforms Centralized Exchanges
Custody Users trade through a wallet and may retain more direct control over funds. Users deposit funds into an exchange account, meaning the platform holds custody.
Ease of use More crypto-native, but usually requires wallet setup and may involve bridging funds. Easier for beginners, especially if they already have an account and stablecoins on the exchange.
Trading experience Built around on-chain access, perpetual futures, funding rates, and wallet-based execution. Similar to standard crypto futures trading, with familiar interfaces, mobile apps, and account dashboards.
Costs Maker/taker fees, funding rates, slippage, bridge costs, and possible network-related costs. Maker/taker fees or commissions, funding, spreads, withdrawal fees, and product-specific costs.
Risks Smart contract, oracle, bridge, liquidity, and third-party market risks. Custody, platform downtime, withdrawal, counterparty, and regional restriction risks.
Best for Experienced DeFi users who value wallet-based access and crypto-native trading. Traders who want convenience, customer support, easier onboarding, and one account for multiple markets.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Can you trade oil with crypto?

Yes, many crypto platforms now offer oil-linked products that let traders gain exposure to crude oil prices using stablecoins or crypto collateral. In most of the cases, these are derivatives or synthetic markets rather than physical oil ownership.

Are crypto oil products backed by real barrels of oil?

Usually, no. Most oil-linked crypto products track benchmarks such as Brent or WTI through derivatives, perpetual contracts, indexes, or oracle-based pricing rather than giving traders ownership of physical crude oil.

Which crypto exchanges let you trade oil?

Oil-linked products are available on exchanges such as Hyperliquid, Binance, and Bybit. Availability can change, so you should always check the live platform before you decide to deposit funds.

Can you trade oil with crypto on weekends?

Yes, most of the crypto-based oil markets are open 24/7. However, weekend trading usually comes with wider spreads, lower liquidity, and pricing differences from traditional oil markets.

Advertisement

Is trading oil with crypto safe?

Yes, trading oil with crypto is generally considered to be safe. Of course, you need to consider market volatility, leverage risk, liquidation risk, and all the caveats that come with perpetual futures trading.

Do you need USDT or USDC to trade oil with crypto?

Yes, you need USDT or USDC to trade oil with crypto. Most of the exchanges support at least one of the stablecoins, so make sure to check which is it before you deposit.

Final Verdict: Best Crypto Exchange to Trade Oil

Hyperliquid is the best crypto exchange to trade oil if you are a crypto native and prefer an on-chain experience. Both Binance and Bybit are great options if you are an existing user or if you are looking for a reliable, trusted, and safe centralized exchange to trade oil.

Keep in mind that the main appeal here is convenience. For inexperienced traders, it might feel a little intimidating, but I’ve found that crypto exchanges do a very good job of walking you through the basics, as well as providing ongoing learning materials for you to improve as a trader.

Advertisement

In short, trading oil with crypto can be incredibly useful for those of you who value speed, stablecoin settlement, and crypto-native access. Of course, it’s not a shortcut around risk.

The post Best Exchanges to Trade Oil With Crypto in 2026: The Complete Guide appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Why Stablecoins Are Becoming Crypto’s Killer App

Published

on

Why Stablecoins Are Becoming Crypto’s Killer App

The biggest crypto adoption story isn’t Bitcoin.

For years, crypto promised revolution through volatility—wild charts, moonshots, and memes. But the real breakout use case turned out to be the exact opposite: boring, stable, dollar-pegged digital cash that actually works.

Stablecoins didn’t “win” because they were exciting. They won because they solved something painfully practical: money that moves at internet speed without behaving like a rollercoaster.

And now they’re quietly eating the financial system from the edges inward.

Advertisement

💸 Payments: Crypto’s First Real Product That Doesn’t Feel Like Crypto

Most crypto apps still feel like experiments. Stablecoins feel like infrastructure.

With assets like USDC and Tether USD (USDT), sending money is:

  • Instant (no banking hours nonsense)
  • Global (no borders pretending to matter)
  • Cheap (no 5-day settlement drama)

On networks like Ethereum, stablecoins behave like programmable dollars—usable in apps, wallets, and smart contracts.

Strong opinion:
👉 Payments is where crypto stops being “tech” and starts being “infrastructure you forget exists.”


🌍 Remittances: The Quiet Killer Use Case

If you’ve ever sent money internationally, you already know the pain:

Advertisement
  • High fees
  • Slow settlement
  • Random middlemen
  • Worse exchange rates “for reasons.”

Stablecoins flip that entirely.

A worker can send value home in seconds using USDC or USDT, and the recipient can cash out locally or hold digitally.

This is especially powerful in emerging markets like the Philippines, where remittances are not just common—they’re part of the economic backbone.

And here’s the uncomfortable truth for legacy rails:
👉 stablecoins don’t need to “compete” with remittance systems. They route around them.


🏦 Treasury Management: Corporate Finance Just Got Upgraded

Companies holding cash face a simple problem: idle money loses value.

Advertisement

Stablecoins introduce a new treasury layer:

  • Instant settlement between partners
  • 24/7 liquidity
  • On-chain transparency
  • Programmable cash flows

Firms can hold USDC instead of sitting on slow-moving bank rails, especially in global operations or crypto-native businesses.

Even traditional finance is starting to realize:
👉 Idle cash is now a design flaw, not a strategy.


🌏 Emerging Market Adoption: Where the Real Explosion Is Happening

This is the part most Western commentary underestimates.

In many emerging economies, stablecoins aren’t “crypto investments”—they’re survival tools for inflation, currency instability, and banking friction.

Advertisement

People use them to:

  • Preserve value in USD exposure
  • Receive freelance income
  • Pay for imports and services
  • Move money across borders without permission layers

And because smartphones + wallets are enough, adoption doesn’t need banks to “approve” anything.

That’s the real unlock:
👉 stablecoins don’t ask for permission from financial systems—they just exist on top of them.


💰 Stablecoin Yield: The New Battleground

Now we’re entering the next phase: what do you do with stablecoins when you’re holding them?

This is where yield emerges:

Advertisement
  • Lending protocols
  • Tokenized treasury bills
  • DeFi money markets
  • Revenue-sharing protocols

Suddenly, stablecoins aren’t just “digital dollars.” They’re productive capital.

But here’s the tension:

👉 The moment yield enters stablecoins, they start competing with banks, money markets, and even sovereign debt instruments.

That’s not a small shift. That’s a financial system rewrite.


🧠 The Bigger Picture: Stablecoins Already Won (They Just Haven’t Been Recognized Yet)

The narrative used to be:

Advertisement

Bitcoin is digital gold
Ethereum is programmable money
Stablecoins are… boring

Reality flipped it.

Now:

  • Bitcoin is macro asset speculation
  • Ethereum is a settlement infrastructure
  • Stablecoins are actual money in motion

And money in motion always wins.


🚀 Final Thought

Stablecoins aren’t “the future of crypto.”

They are crypto’s first real product-market fit that normal people actually use without thinking about it.

Advertisement

No hype cycle needed. No ideology required. Just:

Everything else is just commentary around the system that has already started replacing the old one.

REQUEST AN ARTICLE

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

MetaMask Debuts Agent Wallet for Autonomous DeFi Access

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR

  • MetaMask launched Agent Wallet to enable AI-driven self-custody trading on Ethereum.
  • The wallet supports swaps, perpetual futures, prediction markets, and liquidity provisioning.
  • Every transaction undergoes simulation, threat scanning, and MEV protection before execution.
  • Risky transactions require two-factor authentication approval from the user.
  • Safe transactions qualify for up to $10,000 under Transaction Protection coverage.

MetaMask has introduced Agent Wallet, a self-custodial product built for autonomous trading agents on Ethereum networks. The Consensys-owned wallet said the tool allows software agents to execute decentralized finance strategies while users retain control of funds. The company opened a limited early-access program and plans a wider release in the coming months.

MetaMask Builds Agent Wallet with Enforced Security Controls

MetaMask designed Agent Wallet to support swaps, perpetual futures, prediction markets, and liquidity provisioning across EVM chains. The wallet also integrates with Hyperliquid, expanding trading options for automated strategies. The company said the product targets software agents that manage capital on behalf of users.

MetaMask stated that every transaction must pass a simulation before execution. The system also applies threat scanning and MEV protection checks to each action. If the system flags a transaction as malicious, it requires two-factor authentication approval from the human user.

The wallet enforces preset spending limits and protocol allowlists defined by each account holder. Users can activate a default Guard Mode that maintains strict approval requirements. They can also opt into Beast Mode, which reduces prompts but still blocks risky transactions.

MetaMask confirmed that transactions cleared as safe qualify for up to $10,000 in Transaction Protection coverage. The company said coverage remains subject to specific terms and conditions. Blockaid powers the threat scanning system that identifies scams and other risks.

Advertisement

Consensys Outlines Rollout Plans and Compatibility Framework

Consensys CEO and Ethereum co-founder Joe Lubin described the launch as part of a shift in onchain activity.

“The next great expansion of the onchain economy won’t be driven by humans alone,” Lubin said. He added that agents will manage real capital and require infrastructure that maintains user control.

Lubin also stated that machine intelligence will transact and coordinate over crypto protocols. He said crypto networks suit autonomous actors because they support verification and transparent execution. MetaMask positioned Agent Wallet as a framework-agnostic product compatible with multiple development tools.

The company confirmed compatibility with OpenClaw, OpenAI Codex, Claude Code, Nous Research Hermes Agent, and Cursor. It said developers can connect agents through a command-line interface during the early access phase. MetaMask plans to expand availability later this summer.

MetaMask holds about 26% of the wallet market share, according to Token Terminal data. The company described Agent Wallet as its first agent-focused wallet with full-stack security controls. Early access remains limited while MetaMask prepares for general availability in the coming months.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bounty-chasing Pump Fun users are tattooing crypto tickers on their faces

Published

on

Bounty-chasing Pump Fun users are tattooing crypto tickers on their faces

An Indian man who tattood the ticker of a recently-launched Pump Fun token onto his forehead as part of the platform’s new GO bounty program was stiffed by the bounty’s creator after he got the spelling wrong.

The man in question, known only as Arivu, hoped to scoop a $2,500 bounty by tattooing the word “$boutywork” on his forehead. 

Arivu apparently met all of the bounty’s conditions, namely being filmed holding a sheet of paper bearing the social handle belonging to the bounty’s creator, @ayushquantt, while getting the tattoo. 

However, @ayushquantt appears to have misspelled the ticker belonging to their launched token $bountywork, forgetting an “n” in the bounty description. 

Advertisement

Despite Arivu tattooing the correct word per the description and subsequently pleading for payment, @ayushquantt didn’t pay up.

The bounty has been dubbed dystopian and depressing by onlookers.

Footage of Arivu getting the misspelt crypto tattoo”$boutywork.”

Read more: Memecoin ‘cult’ offered $50K to anyone willing to skydive into World Cup match

Rival crypto token gives Arivu $42K after tattoo mistake

In a number of X Spaces sessions, @ayushquantt appears to have convinced Arivu to go back and film himself correcting the tattoo to the correct spelling. 

Advertisement

However, another crypto X user called @Illyriannft talked Arivu out of going along with any more of @ayushquantt’s requests, and directed him to a token actually called $boutywork that was launched in response to his misfortune. 

Another X user who claims to have seen the Spaces discussion says @ayushquantt claimed that he was sending Arivu fees. However, the money Arivu was receiving actually came from $boutywork and had nothing to do with @ayushquantt. 

The creator of $boutywork was routing 100% of the reward fees to Arivu, who has, at the time of writing, received almost $42,000. 

Read more: Gaza coins, fireworks, and pornstars: Pump Fun livestreams are back

Advertisement

Multiple other people have tattood the $bountywork ticker onto their bodies and shaved their heads in an effort to make a quick buck.  

Pump Fun bounties were controversial at launch, and one determined memecoin group has already promised $50,000 to anyone who can skydive into an ongoing World Cup match and invade the pitch for 30 seconds.  

This bounty was later removed, but others that offer money in return for streaking or throwing a dildo on an NBA court still exist.   

Read more: Crypto clout chasers arrested after Punch the monkey stunt

Advertisement

The memecoin platform already launched a livestream feature last year that saw users perform outrageous stunts to boost the price of their tokens. 

With GO, Pump Fun appears to be attempting to rival lesser-known platform Dare Market, which created a similar bounty program that intends to promote chaotic content. 

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news and investigations, follow us on XBluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

ZIGChain integrates Ondo tokenized stocks, ETFs to expand onchain access

Published

on

ZIGChain integrates Ondo tokenized stocks, ETFs to expand onchain access
  • ZIGChain adds Ondo tokenized stocks and ETFs to its ecosystem.
  • Partnership expands onchain access to US financial markets.
  • Rollout begins in phases across selected ZIGChain applications.

ZIGChain announced on Monday that it is integrating with Ondo Finance to bring tokenized US stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) to users across its blockchain ecosystem, expanding access to on-chain versions of traditional financial assets.

The partnership combines ZIGChain’s infrastructure for regulated investment products with Ondo Finance’s tokenized securities platform, extending their shared goal of making publicly traded US assets more accessible through blockchain technology.

According to the companies, the integration strengthens ZIGChain’s broader real-world asset (RWA) ecosystem, which already includes Valdora Finance’s Liquid RWA Vaults and Beehive’s tokenized small and medium-sized enterprise private credit pipeline.

Partnership expands tokenized asset ecosystem

ZIGChain said the integration aligns with its strategy of bringing established financial products onchain rather than creating entirely new investment instruments.

Ondo Finance has developed infrastructure that enables publicly traded US stocks and ETFs to be represented as programmable blockchain-based assets.

Advertisement

Through the partnership, these tokenized products will become available across the ZIGChain ecosystem, with a particular focus on expanding access for users in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region and beyond.

The companies said the collaboration is designed to provide onchain exposure to institutional-grade financial products while reducing traditional barriers such as intermediaries and minimum investment requirements.

“The next phase of onchain finance is not about replicating access that institutions already have. It is about taking those instruments and making them genuinely accessible to a broader universe of participants, through transparent, scalable onchain infrastructure, without the minimums and intermediaries that have always stood in the way,” said Abdul Rafay Gadit, Co-Founder, ZIGChain.

“Ondo has done the hard work of bringing these products onchain. ZIGChain is the infrastructure through which that reaches a new generation of users. For us, this is deeply aligned with our mission: to make high-quality financial opportunities more open, more programmable, and more globally accessible.”

Advertisement

Ondo aims to broaden distribution

Ondo Finance said expanding access to tokenized securities across new blockchain ecosystems is a core part of its strategy.

The company, which focuses on tokenizing real-world assets, has built infrastructure intended to bridge traditional financial markets with decentralized networks.

Through Ondo Global Markets, investors outside the United States can gain economic exposure to US stocks and ETFs using blockchain-based tokens backed by the corresponding underlying assets.

“Bringing tokenized US stocks and ETFs to new ecosystems and user bases is core to what the Ondo Global Markets platform enables. ZIGChain’s infrastructure gives investors across the GCC onchain exposure to the world’s most in-demand securities, with the execution quality and transparency that institutional markets demand. This is exactly the kind of distribution that expands the reach of tokenized finance where it matters most,” said Oya Celiktemur, EMEA Director, Ondo Finance.

Advertisement

Rollout to begin in phases

According to the announcement, access to Ondo-tokenized products through ZIGChain will be introduced gradually, beginning with selected ecosystem applications and partners before expanding more broadly over time.

The companies noted that the integration does not represent a token launch and does not guarantee investment returns or yield.

Underlying assets are issued by Ondo Global Markets (BVI) Limited, while ZIGChain does not custody the underlying real-world assets.

The partnership comes as blockchain companies continue to focus on tokenizing traditional financial instruments, seeking to combine regulated market exposure with the accessibility and programmability offered by decentralized infrastructure.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025