Franklin Templeton has filed to launch two exchange-traded funds that would automatically direct stock dividend income into Bitcoin exposure.

A registration filing submitted on Thursday shows the asset manager has proposed the Franklin US Equity Bitcoin DRIP Index ETF and the Franklin US Innovation Bitcoin DRIP Index ETF, with an anticipated effective date of Sept. 1, 2026.

The products would track the VettaFi US Large-Cap 500 Bitcoin DRIP Index and a related innovation-focused version. Under the index methodology, dividends generated by the underlying stock portfolios would be reinvested into Bitcoin-linked investments rather than remaining in cash or being distributed to investors.

The filing states that Bitcoin exposure could come through spot Bitcoin exchange-traded products, futures contracts, options, or other investment instruments. The strategy is scheduled to begin with a portfolio allocation of 95% U.S. large-cap equities and 5% Bitcoin exposure.

Quarterly rebalancing rules would reduce Bitcoin allocations above 5% back to 4.5%, while a separate cap would limit Bitcoin exposure to 20% between rebalancing periods, the filing states.

As of April 30, the equity index included approximately 498 securities. The filing states that constituent companies ranged in market capitalization from roughly $7.5 billion to $4.9 trillion.

Franklin expands crypto-linked investment offerings

The proposed ETFs add another product category to Franklin Templeton’s digital asset business, which already includes spot cryptocurrency ETFs, tokenized funds, and blockchain-based investment products.

Data from SoSoValue showed Franklin Templeton’s spot Bitcoin ETF, EZBC, held $358.9 million in net assets and had attracted $329.6 million in cumulative net inflows as of Thursday.

Source: SoSoValue.

The filing follows several digital asset initiatives announced by the firm in recent months. On June 15, Franklin Templeton said it would work with Ondo Finance to offer tokenized versions of its ETFs that can trade directly from crypto wallets on a 24/7 basis. The products target investors outside the United States and include exposure to U.S. equities, fixed income assets, and gold.

Earlier in June, Franklin Templeton integrated its BENJI tokenized money market fund into MoonPay Trade. The partnership allows institutional clients to exchange stablecoins such as USDC and USDT for BENJI through MoonPay’s on-chain trading infrastructure.

In May, Franklin Templeton announced a separate partnership with Payward, the parent company of crypto exchange Kraken. The companies said BENJI would be available on Kraken’s platform as a collateral and cash management product for institutional users. They also disclosed plans to develop additional tokenized investment products through Payward’s xStocks infrastructure.

AllUnity is extending its MiCA-regulated stablecoin lineup with SEKAU, a Swedish krona-backed token designed for institutional settlement and cross-border payments. The company said the new stablecoin is issued under the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) as an e-money token, with reserves held in segregated Swedish krona accounts.

The release also highlights how issuers are adapting to MiCA’s framework by moving beyond “early-stage” token concepts and toward bank- and infrastructure-style custody and settlement. AllUnity’s SEKAU follows its earlier Swiss franc stablecoin rollout, reinforcing a multi-currency strategy built for different blockchain ecosystems.

Key takeaways

• SEKAU is a Swedish krona stablecoin issued under MiCA as an e-money token, backed 1:1 by segregated SEK reserves.
• Banking Circle will hold and manage the reserves, with Marginalen Bank supporting the rollout as a banking partner.
• SEKAU launches on five networks—Ethereum, Solana, Base, Tempo, and Polygon—with plans to add more chains later in 2026.
• AllUnity frames SEKAU as the first fully reserved Swedish krona-denominated MiCA-aligned stablecoin, contrasting it with non-public tokenized experiments.

MiCA compliance becomes the product, not just the legal wrapper

In a statement shared with Cointelegraph, AllUnity described SEKAU as the first fully reserved Swedish krona stablecoin aligned with MiCA, issued as a regulated e-money token (“EMT”). The token’s backing is described as 1:1 by Swedish krona reserves held in segregated accounts, an approach intended to distinguish it from fiat-referenced crypto concepts that may not be designed for regulated redemption and governance.

AllUnity also emphasized that “SEK exposure has previously existed mainly through early-stage concepts,” which it said were not confirmed as MiCA-authorized, fully regulated EMTs. That distinction matters for market participants who care less about token branding and more about how fiat reserves are managed, what oversight applies, and whether the stablecoin is designed to operate as regulated private money under EU rules.

Who will hold the reserves and connect the infrastructure

SEKAU’s structure leans heavily on regulated financial infrastructure and integration partners. Banking Circle, a Luxembourg-based business-to-business bank and financial infrastructure firm, will hold and manage the reserves backing the token. Swedish Marginalen Bank is listed as a banking partner supporting the rollout.

For broader ecosystem access, Trust Anchor Group is named as the infrastructure integration provider for SEKAU. Together, these relationships suggest AllUnity is treating stablecoin deployment as a coordinated effort across custody, banking relationships, and technical connectivity—rather than a standalone token launch.

A multi-chain rollout aimed at liquidity across ecosystems

SEKAU is launching on five blockchain networks: Ethereum, Solana, Base, Tempo, and Polygon. AllUnity said the multi-chain approach is intended to improve access, interoperability, and liquidity across major ecosystems.

The company also signaled it does not intend to stop at the initial set of networks, stating it plans to expand SEKAU to additional blockchain networks later in 2026. The contrast with AllUnity’s previous stablecoin deployment is notable: its Swiss franc stablecoin CHFAU initially launched exclusively on Ethereum in February before expanding to Tempo, implying a more staggered chain rollout for the earlier product.

AllUnity also operates EURAU, a euro-backed stablecoin launched in 2025. According to CoinGecko data cited by Cointelegraph, EURAU has reached a market capitalization of $1.4 million and ranks as the 16th largest euro stablecoin among 23 tracked tokens. CoinGecko also shows the euro stablecoin market totals about $883 million in combined value at the time of writing.

SEK stablecoins in Sweden: public tokens vs closed pilots

AllUnity’s messaging around SEKAU also speaks to the broader question of whether Sweden has stablecoin activity beyond regulated, publicly redeemable products. The company pointed to Sweden’s e-krona project run by the Riksbank as a relevant initiative for tokenized payments infrastructure—but stressed it is fundamentally different from a stablecoin.

AllUnity noted that Swedish banking and fintech pilots have explored tokenized deposit money and settlement systems. However, the company characterized these as “closed, experimental infrastructures” rather than publicly redeemable stablecoins.

The company further referenced communication from the Riksbank earlier in 2026 indicating there were no stablecoins in Swedish kronor. While that does not preclude tokenized pilots or related experiments, it frames SEKAU as a distinct category: a regulated, publicly available krona token built under MiCA’s e-money rules.

What investors and users should watch next

With SEKAU now live across multiple chains, the immediate question is how liquidity and usage develop across Ethereum, Solana, Base, Tempo, and Polygon—especially as AllUnity plans additional network expansion later in 2026. Market participants will also want to monitor how reserve management and EMT compliance are handled in practice over time, and whether the SEK stablecoin narrative gains traction alongside other MiCA-regulated fiat tokens.

Bitcoin’s day-to-day activity is accelerating again, even as the asset’s price action remains relatively unimpressive. According to CryptoQuant, transactions smaller than 0.01 BTC—often associated with “dust” or data-driven on-chain activity—now make up about 80% of all daily transfers on the network, taking overall network activity close to record levels.

In a report released Thursday, CryptoQuant said its Bitcoin “Network Activity Index” has turned positive for the first time since 2024. The change matters because it signals that block space demand is increasingly being driven by non-financial usage—an environment that can translate into more competition for space and higher fees for users who rely on standard economic transactions.

Key takeaways

• CryptoQuant reports that sub-0.01 BTC transactions represent roughly 80% of daily Bitcoin activity, up sharply from earlier years.
• CryptoQuant’s Network Activity Index has moved into positive territory for the first time since 2024, despite weaker price performance.
• Data-inscription and related protocols—especially Ordinals, Runes, BRC-20 activity, and timestamping services—are cited as major contributors.
• Growing micro-transaction volumes can increase block space competition, potentially pushing up fees for “economic” transactions.
• Bitcoin’s mempool is reported at around 128,000 transactions, the highest level since February 2025.

Microtransactions rebound as share of daily volume grows

The most striking development is the shift in the composition of transactions. CryptoQuant notes that transactions below 0.01 BTC accounted for about 44% of daily transactions in 2023, but their share has nearly doubled since then.

CryptoQuant attributes this acceleration largely to inscription-centric demand and other data-writing approaches. In particular, the report highlights Ordinals and Runes—along with BRC-20 activity and data-timestamping protocols—as major drivers of low-value, high-count transactions. This helps explain why overall network activity can rise even when traders are not broadly chasing price momentum.

Research lead Julio Moreno wrote that sustained growth in non-financial activity could “increase block space competition and raise fees for economic transactions.” He also cautioned that the economic value of these transactions is “disproportionately small,” underscoring a key tension: the network can appear busier while the value per transaction remains low.

From earlier inscription booms to today’s renewed congestion

CryptoQuant’s report places the current wave in context by comparing it to past periods when inscription activity pushed Bitcoin toward congestion. The company says congestion levels today remain below the peaks associated with earlier inscription booms, when users embedded data such as images, text, and token-like information directly in blocks.

According to the report, transaction backlogs surged in 2023 as Ordinals and BRC-20 competed with routine transfers for limited block space. It then points to another spike emerging in late 2024 following the launch of the Runes protocol. The latest increase appears to follow that same pattern: bursts of on-chain data activity generate large numbers of transactions, which can swell network queues and raise the likelihood of fee pressure.

Importantly for readers, congestion is not just an abstract metric. When block space demand concentrates in low-value transactions, it can still alter fee dynamics for everyone—particularly those sending standard payments that depend on timely confirmation.

OP_RETURN usage and the mechanics behind higher transaction counts

Beyond the headline micro-transaction shares, CryptoQuant’s research also points to the specific transaction design choices fueling the trend. The report says Runes, Ordinals, BRC-20 tokens, and data-timestamping services produce large volumes of low-value transactions, helping drive the rise in the smallest cohort.

A central element in this mechanism is OP_RETURN, an opcode that allows users to embed data on-chain without creating spendable outputs. CryptoQuant reports that OP_RETURN usage has climbed to near-record levels in 2026.

That increase ties back to a contentious development within Bitcoin’s infrastructure: in 2025, Bitcoin Core developers removed a long-standing 80-byte relay limit. Critics argued the change would make it easier to use Bitcoin for non-financial data storage, effectively lowering friction for larger data embeddings. CryptoQuant frames OP_RETURN as the standard approach for many Bitcoin data-layer protocols, meaning changes in relay behavior can influence how much data activity the network can absorb.

These protocols generate high volumes of dust-value transactions (as low as 546 satoshis), directly explaining the low-value cohort surge.

Put differently, the “how” of transactions matters as much as the “how many.” Even when users are not transferring large amounts of value, on-chain data operations can still consume block resources—resulting in a higher count of transactions competing for inclusion.

Mempool pressure rises alongside the micro-transaction wave

CryptoQuant’s report also connects micro-transaction growth to observable network conditions. It says Bitcoin’s mempool—where unconfirmed transactions wait—has risen to roughly 128,000 transactions. That figure is described as the highest transaction count since February 2025.

For market participants and users, mempool size is often treated as a practical proxy for near-term congestion. While the report notes that current conditions are still below earlier inscription peaks, the combination of a high share of sub-0.01 BTC transactions and a swollen mempool suggests that fee markets may remain sensitive, especially for transactions that need confirmation during busy periods.

Another important implication is that the network’s “busy” signal may increasingly reflect data-layer usage rather than straightforward economic demand. That distinction can affect how participants interpret on-chain metrics: rising activity may not correspond to higher on-chain settlement value, even if it does correspond to greater resource competition.

Looking ahead, readers should watch whether this micro-transaction-driven activity persists and whether mempool levels remain elevated long enough to translate into sustained fee pressure for standard payments. CryptoQuant’s index turning positive after a multi-year stretch is a meaningful early sign—but the key question is whether non-financial activity continues to outpace demand for economic transactions, reshaping fee dynamics as the cycle progresses.

Microtransactions below 0.01 Bitcoin (BTC) now account for roughly 80% of all daily transactions on the network, pushing transaction activity close to record highs despite weak price performance.

The surge has pushed CryptoQuant’s Bitcoin “Network Activity Index” into positive territory for the first time since 2024, according to a Thursday report by the blockchain data company.

Transactions below 0.01 BTC represented about 44% of all daily Bitcoin transactions in 2023, but their share has nearly doubled since then, fueled largely by Ordinals, Runes and other data-inscription protocols.

The report, authored by CryptoQuant head of research Julio Moreno, said sustained growth in non-financial activity could “increase block space competition and raise fees for economic transactions.”

“The economic value of these transactions is, however, disproportionately small,” Moreno wrote.

Bitcoin’s network activity is 7% below its all-time high recorded in September 2024. Source: CryptoQuant

Bitcoin sees renewed inscription-driven congestion

The current congestion remains below the peaks seen during previous booms in Bitcoin inscriptions, when users embedded data such as images, text and token information directly on the blockchain.

Transaction backlogs surged in 2023 as Ordinals and BRC-20 activity competed with ordinary transfers for block space, while another spike emerged in late 2024 following the launch of the Runes protocol.

According to the report, Runes, Ordinals, BRC-20 tokens and data-timestamping services generate large volumes of low-value transactions, helping explain the sharp rise in microtransactions.

OP_RETURN, an opcode that allows data to be embedded onchain without creating spendable outputs, has climbed to near-record usage levels in 2026. It split the Bitcoin community in 2025 after Bitcoin Core developers removed a long-standing 80-byte relay limit. Critics argued the change would make it easier to use Bitcoin for non-financial data storage.

“The OP_RETURN opcode embeds up to 100,000 bytes of data onchain without creating spendable outputs, making it the standard mechanism for Bitcoin data-layer protocols,” Moreno wrote. 

These protocols generate high volumes of dust-value transactions (as low as 546 satoshis), directly explaining the low-value cohort surge.

The trend has also pushed Bitcoin’s mempool, a holding area for unconfirmed transactions, to roughly 128,000 transactions, its highest transaction count since February 2025.

Goldman Sachs has cut its year-end gold forecast by $500 per ounce, citing expectations that the US Federal Reserve will not cut interest rates this year. The revision reflects a broader repricing of “easy money” assumptions—one that could ripple through both traditional safe-haven demand for bullion and the risk appetite that supports cryptocurrencies.

In a note cited by Bloomberg, Goldman Sachs commodity analysts Lina Thomas and Daan Struyven said their view remains “structurally constructive but tactically cautious,” with downside risk in the near term and upside potential over the medium term. The bank’s new target places gold at $4,900, down from an earlier estimate of $5,400.

Key takeaways

• Goldman Sachs lowered its year-end gold forecast to $4,900 per ounce, attributing the change to expectations of no Fed cuts in 2026.
• The downgrade assumes potential rate-cut timing shifts to March 2027 and December 2027.
• Delayed interest-rate cuts can pressure both gold and Bitcoin, since lower rates typically support speculative demand.
• Gold is trading close to key technical territory, with Cointelegraph noting it has fallen more than 22% from its January all-time high.

Gold forecast cut as rate-cut timing slips

The revision is rooted in the macro backdrop. Goldman Sachs is assuming that the next Fed rate cuts could be pushed out to March 2027 and December 2027, a change that can matter because gold does not generate yield. When rates remain higher for longer, cash and bonds become relatively more attractive—raising the opportunity cost of holding bullion.

Goldman’s analysts framed the outlook as a mix of longer-term optimism and short-term caution. While they still see structural support for gold, they warned that tactical pressure could persist as markets price in fewer near-term liquidity tailwinds.

Why higher-for-longer rates matter to crypto

Cryptocurrency investors often treat interest rates as a key driver of liquidity conditions. The article’s underlying thesis is consistent with how the market has historically behaved: when rates fall, the environment tends to improve for high-duration assets and speculative positioning.

Conversely, a delay in US rate cuts can weigh on digital assets. Lower rates typically reduce the cost of capital and can encourage risk-taking, which often benefits assets such as Bitcoin. If expectations for easing are pushed further out, the same “liquidity improves” narrative weakens.

This transmission mechanism is not limited to crypto sentiment. It also connects to gold’s own behavior: as rates stay elevated, bullion may face headwinds even when broader uncertainty keeps demand for a hedge intact. The result can be a period where both gold and cryptocurrencies soften simultaneously, not because the hedge thesis disappears, but because the opportunity-cost argument becomes harder to ignore.

Market pressure builds: CPI prints and Middle East conflict

Gold’s decline has been unfolding against a difficult demand backdrop. Last week, analysts warned that Bitcoin and gold could face additional pressure this year after US inflation data reinforced the idea that policy easing may be delayed. Cointelegraph pointed to a 4.2% year-on-year increase in the US Consumer Price Index in May, alongside ongoing conflict in the Middle East.

In addition to inflation, geopolitical risk can complicate the rate outlook through energy and risk-premium channels. The article notes that the conflict in the Middle East has also taken a toll on both assets. For traders and investors, that matters because it can keep markets focused on macro variables rather than idiosyncratic catalysts.

Approaching psychologically important levels in gold

The downside focus is reinforced by current positioning in gold. Since its January all-time high of $5,327 per ounce, gold has declined by more than 22%, according to the data referenced by Cointelegraph. Bitcoin, meanwhile, is down 28.3% since January, highlighting that the pressure has not been limited to a single asset class.

Gold is now only about $135 away from testing the $4,000 area—an inflection point not seen since November, according to GoldPrice. While forecasts are long-range and markets can overshoot both directions, the proximity to a major round-number level may increase sensitivity to new macro prints, Fed-related expectations, and any changes in geopolitical risk.

The “easy money” story that helped drive gold to record highs earlier this year may be losing some momentum if investors increasingly believe rates will stay restrictive for longer. As the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets rises, the market may need a stronger catalyst—such as clearly falling inflation or evidence of improving liquidity—to reverse course.

HashKey Group senior researcher Tim Sun told Cointelegraph: “Only when inflation drops, rate cuts become viable, and liquidity improves alongside lower capital costs, will the overall risk appetite truly reverse.”

What to watch next

With the debate now centered on whether rate cuts are truly off the table for 2026—and on how quickly liquidity expectations can recover—markets will likely monitor incoming inflation data and Fed-related messaging closely. Cointelegraph also referenced CME’s FedWatch tool, which shows a high chance of rates staying the same or rising in the remaining months of 2026 compared with the current target range of 3.5% to 3.75%.

The digital credit market suffered one of its sharpest selloffs to date on Thursday,
with Strive Asset Management CEO Matt Cole describing the move as a leverage-driven liquidation rather than a sign of weakening credit fundamentals.

Cole said it was “the most difficult day in the history of Digital Credit,” in a post on X, as Strategy’s preferred equity STRC fell as low as $82.50 before recovering to $89, while Strive’s SATA dropped from its par value fell below $93 before rebounding to $97. Both products are designed to trade close to their $100 par value

“What happened today was a leverage liquidation event, not a deterioration in underlying credit quality,” Cole wrote.

Investors attracted by the sector’s relatively high yields (both products offer over double digit yields) increasingly used leverage to enhance returns, according to Cole. When prices began falling, margin calls triggered forced selling, creating a self-reinforcing decline detached from the underlying creditworthiness of issuers.

“There is an old saying in income markets that the road to hell is paved with carry,” he said.

At the beginning of June, more than 200 crypto companies and industry groups — including Coinbase, Andreessen Horowitz and Ripple Labs — sent a letter to Senate Majority and Minority Leaders John Thune and Chuck Schumer, urging them to bring the Digital Asset Market Structure Bill (Clarity Act, H.R. 3633) to a vote without delay, according to Bloomberg Government. The bill has already passed the Senate Banking Committee, and its further progress is being viewed by market participants as a potential step towards a clearer regulatory framework for digital assets in the United States, which could further support institutional interest in Ripple.

Technical Picture

On the H4 chart, Ripple (XRP/USD) has formed a corrective bullish structure, advancing towards the current resistance area where a local peak was established. Following the pullback, the price moved below the POC zone of the current market profile and is attempting to break the trendline of the upward structure. At present, the price has almost reached the nearest support level around $1.125. Above the market lies a fairly significant resistance zone, consisting of the POC area at $1.179–$1.181 and the lower boundary of the profile at $1.175.

Should the price manage to overcome this barrier, it would face another strong resistance area formed by the upper boundary of the profile at $1.265 and the local high at $1.290, where substantial climactic volume was previously recorded. RSI + MAs shows readings of 39, 47 and 51. The indicator does not yet provide clear signals, suggesting that it is still premature to speak of a confirmed trend breakout.

Key Takeaways

Ripple remains at a point of uncertainty, as the fundamental positive sentiment surrounding the Clarity Act has yet to be confirmed by the technical picture. The market is awaiting the Senate’s decision, which could play a major role in determining the asset’s direction in the near future.

FXOpen offers the world’s most popular cryptocurrency CFDs*, including Bitcoin and Ethereum. Floating spreads, 1:2 leverage — at your service (additional fees may apply). Open your trading account now or learn more about crypto CFD trading with FXOpen.

*Important: At FXOpen UK, Cryptocurrency trading via CFDs is only available to our Professional clients. They are not available for trading by Retail clients. To find out more information about how this may affect you, please get in touch with our team.

This article represents the opinion of the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand only. It is not to be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation with respect to products and services provided by the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand, nor is it to be considered financial advice.