Crypto World
Best Smart Contract Auditors and Web3 Security Companies (2026): Ranked by Verifiable Public Evidence
Executive Summary
- Top 3 overall: Sherlock, Trail of Bits, OpenZeppelin (ranked by verifiable methodology, published proof of work, depth of verification, scope breadth, and service completeness).
- Rankings reflect comparative positioning, not hype: platforms score higher when they show repeatable processes and transparent artifacts, and score lower when claims can’t be corroborated publicly.
- In this ranking, ‘best smart contract auditors’ and ‘best Web3 security companies’ means the strongest combination of documented methodology, inspectable proof of work, verification depth, scope coverage, and repeatable capacity.
Intro
We wanted to produce the most accurate and verifiable compilation of Web3 smart contract security providers we could: one with clear reasoning and evidence for why each firm deserves its placement. Security vendors are easy to market and hard to evaluate from the outside, so we built a rubric first and then required every inclusion to be supported by public artifacts that a reader can confirm independently.
We focused on observable signals: documented methodology, published work (report libraries, audit archives, contest indices), verification approach (manual review, testing/tooling, formal methods when applicable), breadth of scope across real production surfaces (contracts, integrations, privileged controls, and relevant offchain components), and capacity signals that indicate repeatable execution. Where we draw a 2026 takeaway, it is based on current public positioning and recent public activity visible in those sources rather than hearsay or private claims.
Methodology
We assembled and ranked providers using a reproducible process designed to reduce subjectivity.
Step 1: Candidate set construction. We started from providers that appear consistently across developer shortlists and third-party roundups, then expanded the set through public cross-references (audit archives, contest platforms, tooling documentation, and published reports).
Step 2: Evidence threshold. We validated each candidate using primary sources that directly document (a) how they work (methodology), (b) what work exists (report libraries/archives), and/or (c) how verification is structured (contest rules, program docs, formal verification docs). Providers that could not substantiate core claims with these artifacts were excluded.
Step 3: Scoring rubric. We scored each remaining provider across six dimensions, using comparisons that can be checked from public material:
- Methodology clarity (is the review process described in a concrete, repeatable way?)
- Proof of work & transparency (public reports, archives, consistent published artifacts)
- Verification depth (manual review plus testing/tooling and/or formal methods where applicable)
- Scope breadth (contracts, integrations, privileged controls, and relevant offchain surfaces when in scope)
- Service completeness / unique value proposition (ability to support the full security need for modern protocols—e.g., pre-launch review options, remediation support, and adjacent security programs)
- Capacity signals (evidence of repeatable execution): published volume metrics (e.g., number of audits/contests), size of public report/contest archives, and visible cadence of engagements.
H2 Top Web3 Auditing and Smart Contract Security Providers (Ranked)
- Sherlock — Best choice overall for complete security coverage (development → audit → post-launch)
Sherlock ranks #1 because it supports a full security workflow across development, pre-launch review, and post-launch programs, including Sherlock AI for development-time analysis.
For audits, the model emphasizes matching teams sourced from Sherlock’s 11,000+ researcher network to the protocol’s risk surface and codebase (rather than a fixed team), and it includes fix verification as part of the loop.
For higher-stakes scopes, Blackthorn is described as a tiered engagement that prioritizes a more senior reviewer set.
Public proof points include a Morpho Vaults V2 Blackthorn case study and an Ethereum Foundation audit contest hosted on the platform with public contest pages/announcements, which makes the approach easier to verify end-to-end. That combination – repeatable workflow plus public, inspectable evidence across both high-stakes and ecosystem-scale engagements – is why Sherlock leads this ranking.
- Trail of Bits — Best boutique option for deep systems work across onchain + offchain
Trail of Bits explicitly scopes blockchain security work to include more than contract review, calling out system-level surfaces like oracles, DeFi integrations, upgradeability patterns, and deployment/incident-response considerations.
That matters because many real failures sit at boundaries between contracts and the surrounding infrastructure, not inside a single function. Their positioning is backed by a concrete services breakdown that describes design assessment and security analysis across these system components, rather than generic “we audit smart contracts” language.
In this list, ToB sits near the top because its public scope definition makes it easy to validate what “systems work” means before you hire them.
- OpenZeppelin — Best default private audit firm for process maturity + repeatability
OpenZeppelin publishes a plain-language description of how audits are run, including a line-by-line review model where each line is inspected by at least two security researchers.
They also describe using fuzzing and invariant testing when needed, which is a concrete “verification depth” signal that readers can evaluate without reading between the lines.
OpenZeppelin ranks highly here because the methodology is spelled out clearly enough to be audited itself: you can see the process they claim to follow, not just outcomes.
If you’re choosing an auditor primarily on predictability and documented process, this is one of the more checkable options in the market.
- Zellic (and Zenith) — Best research-driven audit shop, plus ownership of Code4rena
Zellic’s acquisition of Code4rena is a major structural signal because it ties a boutique audit team to a competitive-audit engine, and the acquisition rationale is publicly explained by Zellic.Zellic ranks above pure competitive platforms because it offers both a premium audit path (Zenith) and ownership of the contest channel, but ranks below the top three because its “complete offering” is less explicitly packaged end-to-end (development-time analysis + post-launch programs) than Sherlock’s.
Relative to traditional audit firms, Zellic’s differentiation is research posture plus platform adjacency; the firm adds a staffed audit option and toolchain narrative.
- Certora — Best formal verification option for specification-driven correctness
Certora is best known for formal verification: instead of relying only on review + testing, teams write explicit correctness properties (specs) and use the Certora Prover to check whether the contract can violate them. That’s a distinct verification mode that’s especially useful for protocols where “it seems fine” isn’t good enough: complex accounting, invariants across upgrades, or edge-case state transitions.
Certora publishes detailed primary documentation on the Prover and the Certora Verification Language (CVL), which makes the methodology easy to inspect before engaging. Under this rubric, it earns a top slot because the verification approach is concrete, reproducible, and documented at a level most audit firms don’t expose publicly.
- Cyfrin (CodeHawks) — Best rising competitive audits alternative with clear productization
CodeHawks documents what it is and how it works in its own docs, describing competitive audit marketplaces that can be run as public or private competitions.
That kind of documentation matters for evaluation because it clarifies what the engagement actually looks like (competition structure, participation model), not just marketing outcomes.
CodeHawks ranks on this list because it represents a second major competitive-audit option with visible, structured artifacts that an evaluator can review quickly.
If you’re comparing contest-style review paths, this is one of the more straightforward platforms to validate from primary sources.
- CertiK — Best large-scale security provider (audits + continuous monitoring footprint)
CertiK positions itself as the largest Web3 security service provider and emphasizes both audit services and real-time monitoring (Skynet), giving it a “security program” footprint rather than a pure audit shop identity.Skynet’s public-facing pages (including leaderboards) provide a concrete artifact for the monitoring claim, which is part of why CertiK is commonly mentioned in “best web3 security company” prompts.
CertiK ranks below boutique leaders and research-heavy firms because the rubric here prioritizes depth of verification and transparency of methodology over sheer breadth/scale, and large-scale providers tend to be more variable across engagements.
It still belongs high on the list because buyers often need a provider with a broad menu (audit + monitoring) and high visibility across many ecosystems, and CertiK has verifiable signals for that role.
Concluding Thoughts
Use this ranking as an evidence-based shortlist. “Best” only matters if a provider’s documented methodology and public proof-of-work match the ways your protocol can actually fail: value-moving paths, trust boundaries, integrations, and upgrade surfaces.
A practical way to choose:
- Start by mapping loss paths and trust boundaries. Write down how funds can be drained or stuck, which roles can change behavior, and which dependencies (oracles, bridges, keepers, relayers) can alter outcomes.
- Match the provider to the surface area. System-level scopes (offchain components, bridges, infra) require different skill sets than a contracts-only review.
- Validate with artifacts, not claims. Prefer providers that publish clear methodology, report/contest archives, and verification details you can inspect.
- Plan for remediation and follow-up. The engagement should include fix verification and clarity on what changes trigger re-review.
As a rule of thumb: pick the firm (or combination) whose public evidence best supports your needs – private audit depth, broader independent reviewer coverage, formal verification, or post-launch incentives—rather than optimizing for a name alone. We’ll keep updating this list as offerings and publicly verifiable evidence change.
Crypto World
Ondo and Securitize discuss at Consensus Hong Kong
Hong Kong — Tokenization is gaining traction, but its success depends less on market hype and more on real-world utility, say executives from Ondo Finance and Securitize.
“There’s no shortage of firms, of issuers, of companies that are interested in tokenizing,” said Graham Ferguson, head of ecosystem at Securitize, during a panel discussion at Consensus Hong Kong. “But it’s on us to figure out how to distribute these assets on-chain via exchanges in a way that is compliant, regulatory-friendly globally.”
Ferguson emphasized that despite high interest on the institutional side, distribution and compliance remain the bottlenecks. “The biggest issue that we run into is communicating with exchanges and DeFi protocols about the requirements that are necessary to adhere to our obligations as a regulated entity,” he said.
Securitize has partnered with firms such as BlackRock to tokenize real-world assets, including U.S. Treasury funds. BlackRock’s BUIDL fund, launched in 2024, now holds over $2.2 billion in assets, making it the largest tokenized Treasury fund on the market.
Ondo Finance, which also focuses on tokenized Treasuries and exchange-traded funds (ETFs), has about $2 billion in total value locked (TVL) according to data from rwa.xzy. Min Lin, Ondo’s managing director of global expansion, said tokenized Treasuries today are a fraction of the potential market.
Both speakers stressed that the next phase of tokenization will be driven by what users can actually do with tokenized assets. Ondo recently enabled tokenized stocks and ETFs to be used as margin collateral in DeFi perpetuals — a first, Lin said.
“That brings a lot more capital efficiency in terms of the utility of those tokenized assets,” he added.
Ferguson agreed, arguing that technological advantages like programmable compliance and fast settlement aren’t enough on their own. “Utility is absolutely far and away number one,” he said. “That’s what will drive the next phase.”
Crypto World
Did the WBTC DAO approve Justin Sun’s HTX as a merchant?
Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) spent years marketing itself as being governed by decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) that would have oversight over many parts of the product, including “the addition and removal of merchants and custodians.”
Its whitepaper claimed that “signatures are required from DAO members in order to add/remove members.”
Even as recently as a few months ago, WBTC has continued to emphasize that it “operates through a DAO.”
However, this supposed role of the WBTC DAO hasn’t always been respected.
HTX, formerly Huobi, was added as a merchant, the product’s term for an entity who can initiate mints and burns of WBTC, however, it was not approved by the DAO members listed on the Github, but a different set of signers from a different multisignature wallet.
A review of the smart contract reveals that 0xbE6d2444a717767544a8b0Ba77833AA6519D81cD is one of the merchants returned by the “getMerchants” function.
Read more: Is HTX redeeming 80% of TrueUSD?
This address was listed as HTX on the WBTC dashboard in late 2024 when Protos reported on it being used to redeem approximately half a billion dollars worth of WBTC.
However, this address isn’t listed as one of the merchants on the WBTC DAO GitHub page.
HTX is listed as one of the merchants on the WBTC website.
The entities that are still listed on GitHub include defunct and fraudulent entities such as Alameda Research and Three Arrows Capital, both of which are also still listed on the smart contract.
By further reviewing blockchain transactions on Ethereum, we can identify that this address was added as a merchant in November 2024, approximately two months after BiT Global and Justin Sun got involved in WBTC.
Read more: WBTC relaunches on TRON, but abandoned version is bigger
At the time, this transaction came from 0x4dbbbFb0e68bE9D8F5a377A4654604a62E851e80.
Strangely, this address isn’t listed as one of the multisignature wallets for WBTC on GitHub.
The listed multisignature wallet doesn’t include any transactions for the day when HTX was added as a merchant.
The inclusion of HTX as a merchant becomes increasingly important in light of some of the problematic behaviors that the exchange is engaged in.
Read more: Justin Sun defends HTX while it lends 92% of its USDT on Aave
It appears the publicly disclosed multisignature wallet, 0xB33f8879d4608711cEBb623F293F8Da13B8A37c5, appears to have been quietly replaced with a brand new multisignature wallet.
The wallet that was used lists several owners, many of whom differ from the WBTC DAO Github:
- 0xFDF28Bf25779ED4cA74e958d54653260af604C20 — Listed as Kyber on the Merchants list on the GitHub, isn’t listed as a DAO member.
- 0xb0F42D187145911C2aD1755831aDeD125619bd27 — Listed as BitGo on the custodian part of the GitHub, isn’t listed as a DAO member on the current GitHub commit, is listed as a small DAO member on a pull request.
- 0xd5d4aB76e8F22a0FdCeF8F483cC794a74A1a928e — Not listed on the current GitHub commit, is mentioned in a pull request as Maker.
- 0xB9062896ec3A615a4e4444DF183F0531a77218AE — Listed as Aave on the Merchants list on the GitHub, is not listed as a DAO member on the current commit, and is mentioned as a small DAO member on a pull request.
- 0xddD5105b94A647eEa6776B5A63e37D81eAE3566F — Not listed on the current GitHub commit, is listed on a pull request as Tom Bean and is listed as a small DAO member there, multisignature wallet that includes:
- 0x97788A242B6A9B1C4Cb103e8947df03801829BE4 — Not listed on the GitHub at all.
- 0x59150a3d034B435327C1A95A116C80F3bE2e4B5E — Not listed on the GitHub at all.
- 0x926314B7c2d36871eaf60Afa3D7E8ffc0f4F9A80 — Not listed on the current GitHub commit, appears to be a multisignature wallet created using BitGo’s technology, and is listed as BitGo 2 on a pull request describing it as a member of the small DAO.
- 0x51c44979eA04256f678552BE65FAf67f808b3EC0 — Not listed on the current GitHub commit, appears to be another multisignature wallet created using BitGo’s technology, is listed as BitGo 3 on a pull request describing it as a member of the small DAO.
- 0x0940c5bcAAe6e9Fbd22e869c2a3cD7A21604ED8D — Not listed on the GitHub at all.
- 0x5DCb2Cc68F4b975E1E2b77E723126a9f560F08E8 — Not listed on the GitHub at all.
It is not clear why these changes aren’t reflected on the current version of the GitHub repository. Protos reached out to WBTC for some clarification, but it didn’t respond before publication.
By further reviewing the smart contract at 0x4dbbbFb0e68bE9D8F5a377A4654604a62E851e80, we can identify the five addresses that approved the listing of HTX:
- 0xFDF28Bf25779ED4cA74e958d54653260af604C20 — Kyber
- 0xb0F42D187145911C2aD1755831aDeD125619bd27 — BitGo
- 0xddD5105b94A647eEa6776B5A63e37D81eAE3566F — Tom Bean
- 0x926314B7c2d36871eaf60Afa3D7E8ffc0f4F9A80 — BitGo
- 0x51c44979eA04256f678552BE65FAf67f808b3EC0 — BitGo
This means that although this multisignature wallet requires five signatures, three of them came from the same entity.
Only two non-custodian entities approved the addition of HTX as a merchant and those aren’t currently listed as DAO members on GitHub.
Adding to the intrigue, Tom Bean’s project, bZx, was built on Kyber.
It’s also worth highlighting the fact that this multisignature wallet requires five signatures, BitGo controls three, and there are two addresses that aren’t listed at all on GitHub.
If those are controlled by BitGo or BiT Global, then it would be possible for the custodians to make changes without approval from a single additional WBTC DAO member.
Protos reached out to WBTC to determine the identity of those two addresses, but again, didn’t get a response before publication.
BiT Global was added without WBTC DAO approval
This isn’t the first time that WBTC has appeared to ignore the advertised role of its DAO.
The whitepaper for WBTC claimed that “addition/removal of custodians” would be controlled by this DAO.
This used to be echoed on the website, which claimed, “The addition and removal of merchants and custodians will be an open process controlled by a multi-signature contract.”
Read more: Coinbase to delist WBTC months after Justin Sun controversy
Mike Belshe, the chief executive of BitGo, also claimed when BiT Global was being installed that there was a large DAO that “owns the smart contract” and “picks, you know, how we do custody of this thing.”
Strangely, despite that claim, the WBTC DAO didn’t seem to be consulted on the addition of Sun-affiliated BiT Global as a custodian for WBTC.
The Github for the WBTC DAO still doesn’t list BiT Global as a custodian.
The website for WBTC does list BiT Global as one of the custodians, alongside BitGo and BitGo Singapore.
The “members” smart contract still only lists a single custodian, 0xb0F42D187145911C2aD1755831aDeD125619bd27, a BitGo address.
This address is a multi-signature, so it’s possible that BiT Global was added as a signer to this wallet, meaning that the smart contract did not need to be updated with a new custodian address.
Broadly, despite the fact that WBTC manages over $8 billion in value, it seems to have neglected and ignored the DAO that has frequently been an important part of its marketing.
It’s replaced the multisignature wallet that governs it, without updates, with members whose identity we do not know.
This replacement made it possible, or convenient, for HTX to be added as a merchant, but other problems have been ignored, such as the fact that both Alameda Research and Three Arrows Capital are included as merchants.
The large DAO was apparently bypassed regarding the addition of BiT Global.
However it is that WBTC operates, it’s not principally through its DAO.
Its claims of transparency and decentralization have been dashed against the difficulty of coordinating a variety of actors around the world.
Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news and investigations, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.
Crypto World
UNI price pops as BlackRock taps Uniswap to tap liquidity
The Uniswap price spiked after securing a major deal with Securitize, BlackRock’s partner.
Summary
- UNI price jumped after a major partnership between Uniswap and Securitize.
- The partnership will see BlackRock’s BUIDL added to UniswapX.
- Technical analysis points to a UNI price reversal.
Uniswap (UNI) token jumped to a high of $4.57, its highest point since January 29, and 62% above its lowest level this year. It then pulled back to $3.7 at press time. It remains 68% below its 2025 peak.
UNI price jumped after a major deal between Uniswap and Securitize, a company that offers real-world asset tokenization. The partnership will see the BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund (BUIDL) available on UniswapX.
As a result, on-chain trading for BUIDL will now be possible, unlocking liquidity options for BUIDL holders. It aims to bridge traditional finance and decentralized finance. In a statement, Hayden Adams, Uniswap Labs founder and CEO said:
“Enabling BUIDL on UniswapX with BlackRock and Securitize supercharges our mission by creating efficient markets, better liquidity, and faster settlement. I’m excited to see what we build together.”
The partnership came at a time when Uniswap is facing major headwinds, including the soaring competition from other DEX networks like PancakeSwap and Raydiu. Most of the competition is coming from perpetual DEX networks like Hyperliquid, edgeX, Lighter, and Aster.
For example, data compiled by DeFi Llama shows that Uniswap handled over $60 billion in volume in January, much lower than the October high of $123 billion. Its fees dropped to $58 million from the October high of $132 million.
On the other hand, Hyperliquid’s volume in January stood at over $208 billion, while its fees was $78 million. Aster and Lighter are handling more volume than Uniswap as demand for decentralized perpetual futures rise.
UNI price prediction: Technical analysis

The daily timeframe chart shows that the UNI crypto price has been in a strong downward trend in the past few months. It dropped from a high of $12.30 in August to a low of $2.80 this month.
The coin rebounded and retested the important resistance level at $4.55 after the BlackRock announcement. This price was important as it coincides with the neckline of the head-and-shoulders chart pattern that formed between April and January this year.
Therefore, there are signs that the coin has formed a break-and-retest pattern, a common continuation sign in technical analysis. This pattern often leads to a continuation, meaning the downward trend will resume as the crypto market crash continues.
Crypto World
Bitcoin Rebound Fades as Range Highs Crumble: Why BTC Is Volatile
Bitcoin, the trailblazer of the crypto markets, extended a three-day retreat after failing to sustain a breakthrough above $70,000, briefly slipping under $66,000 during the New York session. The move comes as liquidity in spot markets appears thinner, with on-chain signals pointing to the possibility that selling pressure on dominant venue Binance is guiding the short-term trajectory. While the setup has drawn comparisons to prior pullbacks, the current dynamics show subdued US participation and a reluctance among traders to redeploy capital at current levels. Investors are watching whether the price can establish a more durable bottom or if the weakness spills into the broader risk-on spectrum, given the sensitivity of Bitcoin to macro risk sentiment, ETF flows, and spot demand signals.
Key takeaways
- The Coinbase premium index has dipped below zero, signaling muted US spot demand at current price levels.
- Cumulative volume delta (CVD) on Binance has remained negative, underscoring persistent net selling pressure rather than accumulation.
- The 30-day new money flow has flipped to negative territory, around –$2.8 billion, suggesting weaker fresh capital entering the market.
- Open interest has declined to about $17.6 billion, indicating a unwind of leverage rather than new long exposure.
- The “young supply” metric (coins moved in the last 0–1 month) has cooled to roughly 13%, pointing to thinner speculative participation compared with prior rallies.
Tickers mentioned: $BTC
Sentiment: Bearish
Price impact: Negative. The failure to sustain above $70,000 and the renewed downside move below $66,000 reflect renewed selling pressure and a cautious posture among traders.
Trading idea (Not Financial Advice): Hold. The lack of robust spot demand and waning open interest suggest patience until on-chain signals and price action align for a nearer-term reversal.
Market context: The current pullback follows a period of net selling pressure on Binance with a subdued US participation backdrop, as the Coinbase premium remains negative and on-chain metrics trend softer than in prior upswings.
Why it matters
The latest data paints a picture of a market that is trading with caution rather than enthusiasm. Bitcoin’s price action near the $66,000 level coincides with several on-chain indicators that have historically presaged slower bullish inflows rather than renewed buying interest. The negative CVD on Binance, coupled with a muted Coinbase premium, suggests that spot-led demand—the fuel for a sustained upmove—has cooled at these price levels. In practical terms, the market is testing whether investors will step in at lower levels or if the liquidity tap remains largely off, complicating any attempt to stage a durable rally in the near term.
From a leverage perspective, the steady decline in open interest implies that traders are closing positions rather than initiating new long bets. This is important because it signals a risk-tolerant environment is not currently driving new exposures; instead, participants are digesting the recent price action and awaiting clearer catalysts. The combined effect of shrinking leverage and muted new money flow reduces the odds of a rapid, self-sustaining rebound in Bitcoin prices without a shift in the broader liquidity backdrop or a fresh wave of buying momentum from major players.
Looking at the supply-side signals, the “young supply” share has cooled toward the lower end of its range, suggesting a lull in speculative participation from newer entrants. When the youth supply shrinks, it often accompanies a lack of capitulation-driven liquidity rather than the exuberance seen in stronger uptrends. In the current context, the market atmosphere resembles a phase of consolidation with a cautious tilt, rather than a momentum-driven breakout. The data also underlines the interplay between spot demand and the efficiency of price discovery in a market where futures and ETFs can influence the pace and direction of moves, even as spot liquidity remains fragile.
For readers tracking cross-corridors of influence, the ongoing discussion around spot Bitcoin ETFs and their inflows remains relevant. Related reporting has highlighted that spot Bitcoin ETFs added significant inflows recently, underscoring how new vehicles can alter risk appetite and liquidity dynamics even as spot markets grapple with a cooler demand cycle. This backdrop reinforces the notion that any sustained upside will likely hinge on a combination of improved on-chain demand, favorable macro conditions, and constructive ETF or futures flows that re-energize liquidity in the ecosystem.
Additional on-chain context comes from CryptoQuant data, which continues to emphasize the absence of robust spot demand below the $70,000 threshold. The 30-day money flow is negative, hovering near –$2.8 billion, with daily readings around the mid-to-high single-digit hundreds of millions of dollars in the red. In this environment, weaker inflows reduce the likelihood of a fast-paced re-acceleration, even as the market eyes any sign of a structural shift or a change in the ratio of bids to asks that could spark renewed buying interest.
All told, the market appears to be navigating a transitional phase: price discovery is proceeding in a backdrop of thinning liquidity, a cautious stance among buyers, and on-chain signals that favor restraint over aggression. While some traders will remain hopeful for a fast revival, others may choose to observe the next few sessions for clearer confirmation that demand is returning with conviction, not merely oscillating around a key price threshold.
Related: Spot Bitcoin ETFs add $167M, nearly erase last week’s outflows
CryptoQuant data further reinforces the lack of spot demand below $70,000. The 30-day cumulative new money flow has turned negative, near -$2.8 billion, while recent daily readings remain subdued around -$239 million. Unlike prior uptrends where price pullbacks drew meaningful inflows, the current price slide has not sparked a corresponding surge of capital into the market.
The “young supply” share (0–1 month), which tracks coins moved recently, has also cooled toward the lower end of its recent range, hovering near 13%. This pattern points to reduced speculative participation from newer traders, a characteristic frequently observed before the formation of a new base rather than during a fresh leg higher. Strong rallies in the past have been accompanied by rising young supply, expanding capital inflows, and increasing open interest—none of which are evident in the current phase, adding to the cautioned tone around near-term price prospects.
Related: Rare Bitcoin signal flashes: Will a 220percent BTC price rally follow?
Crypto World
Gold Reaches Critical Zone as Decade-Long Bull Run Shows Historical Peak Signals
TLDR:
- Gold’s 427% rally since 2016 enters the same zone where previous decade-long super runs peaked in 1980 and 2011.
- Historical pattern shows gold consolidates for years after peaks while capital rotates into stocks for extended rallies.
- Cryptocurrency now provides institutional alternative for capital rotation that didn’t exist during previous gold cycles.
- Combination of cooling inflation, rising real rates, and Fed tightening typically signals end of gold super runs.
Gold has reached a price level that historically marks the end of major bull runs. The precious metal recently hit a cycle high near $5,600, reflecting a 427% gain since 2016.
Market analysts now compare current conditions to previous decade-long rallies that ended in 1980 and 2011. The pattern suggests a potential rotation of capital into other asset classes.
However, this cycle introduces a new variable with crypto markets now positioned as institutional investments.
Historical Super Runs Follow Consistent Decade Pattern
Gold moves in extended bull markets that typically last nine to ten years. The 1970 to 1980 rally delivered returns of 2,403% before peaking.
Another super run from 2001 to 2011 generated 655% gains. The current 2016 to 2026 cycle has produced 427% returns so far.
These prolonged trends don’t continue indefinitely, according to market data. Instead, gold runs hard for approximately a decade before entering extended consolidation periods.
After reaching peaks, the metal often trades sideways or declines for years. The pattern has repeated across different economic environments and policy regimes.
Bull Theory noted on social media that gold just entered the same zone where every major bull run historically ended. The observation points to technical and fundamental factors aligning with previous market tops.
Yet a new high alone doesn’t confirm a peak has formed. The current position simply indicates the rally is no longer in early stages.
Several factors typically combine to end gold super runs. Inflation cooling and real rates moving higher create headwinds for the metal.
Federal Reserve tightening policies reduce speculative demand. Dollar stabilization removes currency-driven buying pressure. Risk appetite returning to markets pulls capital toward growth assets.
Crypto Emerges as New Rotation Destination
Previous gold peaks in 1980 and 2011 triggered capital flows into equities. After the 1980 top, stocks entered a two-decade bull market.
The 2011 peak preceded another extended equity rally through the 2010s. Gold cooled while stock markets absorbed investment capital seeking returns.
The current cycle presents a different landscape compared to earlier periods. Cryptocurrency markets have matured into institutional asset classes with regulated exchange-traded funds.
Public companies now hold Bitcoin on balance sheets. The investor base has expanded beyond retail traders to include pension funds and corporate treasuries.
This development changes the traditional rotation pattern that followed gold peaks. Capital flowing out of precious metals now has multiple destinations.
Instead of moving solely into stocks, funds can allocate to Bitcoin and digital assets. Crypto represents the risk-on component that didn’t exist in previous cycles.
The potential shift could reshape how bull markets unfold across asset classes. If gold enters a consolidation phase similar to past patterns, both stocks and crypto may benefit.
Bitcoin’s role as a high-beta growth asset positions it to capture speculative capital. The combination of established equities and emerging digital markets creates broader opportunities for portfolio allocation.
Crypto World
Ondo Global Markets Taps Chainlink for US Stock Price Feeds
Ondo Global Markets has teamed up with Chainlink to utilize its Data Feeds, enhancing onchain pricing for tokenized U.S. stocks and ETFs, reinforcing the integration of traditional securities into DeFi.
Ondo Global Markets has announced a strategic partnership with Chainlink, adopting Chainlink Data Feeds as its official oracle solution to enhance onchain pricing for its tokenized U.S. stocks and ETFs.
Chainlink’s decentralized oracle networks will enable smart contracts on Ondo’s platform to securely interact with external data sources, ensuring accurate and reliable pricing information for tokenized assets such as SPYon, QQQon, and TSLAon. These feeds are now live and are already securing DeFi applications like Euler, allowing users to borrow stablecoins against tokenized stocks and ETFs used as collateral.
Tokenized securities can now be securely and reliably used as productive DeFi collateral, including within lending markets, vaults, and structured products—all backed by institutional-grade market data powered by Chainlink.
This article was generated with the assistance of AI workflows.
Crypto World
Ripple Partners with Aviva Investors to Tokenize Traditional Assets
Ripple has announced a new partnership with Aviva Investors, marking a significant step toward the tokenization of traditional financial assets on the XRP Ledger. This partnership will bring the benefits of tokenized fund structures to the UK investment sector. Ripple’s collaboration with Aviva Investors highlights the growing momentum behind the tokenization of markets and the expanding use of blockchain technology in traditional finance.
Ripple Partners with Aviva Investors for Tokenized Fund Structures
Ripple has teamed up with Aviva Investors, a key asset manager in the UK, to bring traditional financial assets onto the XRP Ledger. This collaboration represents a strategic move to expand Ripple’s efforts in the tokenization space. Both parties aim to bring technological efficiencies to the investment sector by developing tokenized fund structures.
Ripple has been at the forefront of blockchain and digital asset innovation, with the XRP Ledger having processed over four billion transactions since 2012. It currently operates with more than seven million active wallets and 120 individual validators. This marks Ripple’s first partnership with an asset manager in the UK, as it seeks to integrate regulated financial assets into its blockchain ecosystem.
We’re thrilled to announce that @Ripple is partnering with Aviva Investors to bring traditional fund structures to the XRP Ledger. This marks our first collaboration with a European investment management firm to tokenize real-world assets (RWAs) at scale.
By leveraging the…
— Reece Merrick (@reece_merrick) February 11, 2026
The partnership is set to enable Aviva Investors to debut tokenized financial products using Ripple’s blockchain technology. The collaboration promises to enhance both time and cost efficiency in the investment process. Ripple’s involvement in tokenization is part of a broader strategy to institutionalize blockchain-based financial solutions, adding to its existing portfolio of global partnerships with firms like BNY Mellon and American Express.
Ripple’s Continued Focus on Institutional Tokenization
Ripple has been building on its vision to offer institutional-grade tokenization solutions on the XRP Ledger. The firm’s recent roadmap emphasized its commitment to expanding the adoption of tokenized assets, aiming to enhance liquidity and operational efficiency across financial markets. This partnership with Aviva Investors is part of Ripple’s ongoing efforts to integrate traditional finance with blockchain technology.
Aviva Investors shares Ripple’s enthusiasm for the potential of tokenization in transforming financial markets. According to Nigel Khakoo, Vice President of Trading and Markets, the development of tokenized fund structures can bring substantial technological advancements to the investment sector. Tokenization, he explained, could lead to greater scalability for regulated financial assets.
Ripple’s tokenization efforts have already made waves in other industries. The company has recently provided custody services for Billiton Diamond and Ctrl Alt’s initiative to tokenize over $280 million in polished diamonds. Ripple’s expanding focus on tokenization is poised to reshape how financial assets are managed and traded on blockchain platforms.
Ripple’s Commitment to XRP as the Core Asset
Despite its expanding ventures into tokenization and other blockchain technologies, Ripple remains committed to XRP as its core asset. CEO Brad Garlinghouse reaffirmed that XRP continues to be the company’s top priority. This statement follows speculation that Ripple might be shifting its focus toward its stablecoin, RLUSD, particularly in light of its recent partnership with Zand Bank in the UAE.
Ripple’s dedication to XRP is evident in its significant investment in the digital asset’s future. The company has established a $1 billion treasury project for XRP, signaling its long-term vision for the coin. While Ripple continues to innovate in the blockchain space, it remains focused on the continued growth and utility of XRP within its ecosystem.
As Ripple forges ahead with its strategic initiatives, its commitment to XRP serves as the foundation for its broader ambitions. The firm’s ongoing efforts to integrate traditional financial assets onto blockchain platforms further highlight XRP’s potential in the future of global finance.
Crypto World
Cambodia arrests 800 in latest casino scam centre raid
Cambodian police have reportedly dismantled yet another scam operation, this time detaining 800 scammers operating from the Xinli Casino in southern Cambodia.
Local media reports that police discovered the hundreds of scammers nestled on the 18th and 19th floors of the casino, located in the coastal city of Sihanoukville.
They detained 800 individuals whose nationalities include Chinese, American, Filipino, Korean, Japanese, Pakistani, Indian, and Khmer nationals. Police reportedly seized 650 computers and 1,000 mobile phones.
The latest raid adds to the country’s tally of 200 scam center busts its carried out this year.
Read more: Cambodian scam rings facing disruption since kingpin’s arrest
The senior minister for Cambodia’s Commission for Combating Online Scams, Chhay Sinarith, told the publication that 11,000 scam workers have been deported and 173 top crime figures have been arrested since Cambodia began its crackdown campaign late last year.
Earlier this week, officials granted Reuters access to another compound in Kampot known as “My Casino.”
Around 7,000 workers reportedly fled the compound after its owner, casino tycoon Ly Kuong, was arrested last month. Police claim they weren’t able arrest any fleeing workers.
Kampot’s Chief of Police, Mao Chanmothurith, told reporters that the entire province only has 1,000 policemen and 300 military policemen and that “even with both forces combined, we still can’t stop them because there were about 6,000 to 7,000 of them.”
Read more: China executes four more in pig butchering scam crackdown
These compounds are often full of trafficked victims who are forced to carry out cryptocurrency scams, including so-called “pig-butchering.”
Cambodia scam compounds are in disarray
Last year, the US indicted the alleged scam kingpin Chen Zhi. He runs the Prince Group and is accused of stealing billions of dollars from victims via an international scam network.
Chen was arrested last month and extradited to China, which has executed a number of scam kingpins since the start of the year.
His arrest threw many scam compounds into disarray, forcing thousands of workers flee and leading to what Amnesty International claims is a “humanitarian crisis.”
Reuters notes how Cambodia has been lax with these scam operations in the past, but stepped up its enforcement after international pressure from the US and China.
Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news and investigations, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.
Crypto World
Gen Z ‘nihilism’ is fueling a $100 trillion crypto derivatives boom, in response to a broken system
The surge in speculation driving prediction markets and leveraged bets on various sectors isn’t reckless, it’s rational, according to CoinFund managing partner David Pakman.
In a presentation during Consensus Hong Kong, Pakman reframed the behavior as “economic nihilism,” a calculated response by Gen Z to structural barriers in wealth building.
His case started with housing. For Gen X and Boomers, he said, the average home cost about 4.5 times their annual salary. For Gen Z, it’s closer to 7.5 times.
That shift, Pakman argued, effectively shuts younger people out of the housing market, long considered the cornerstone of middle-class wealth. Only 13% of 25-year-olds own their homes, over half of Gen Z investors now own crypto, he said.
With few traditional options, Pakman said younger generations are turning to high-risk bets, including memecoins, perpetual futures, zero-days-to-expiration options and prediction markets, not out of ignorance but as a strategy.
“It’s becoming actually rational to think that if the typical ways that long-term wealth creation is closed off to you, a small chance at a large return beats near certainty of slow decline,” he said.
He pointed to crypto perpetual contracts. These products, futures contracts that don’t expire, saw $100 trillion in notional volume last year, according to data he shared.
Prediction markets also exploded, from $100 million to $44 billion in just three years. While some pundits use them for political forecasting, Pakman said 80% of the activity is sports betting. Dune data paints a similar picture, with $1.8 billion out of $2 billion in daily prediction-market volumes centered on sports at the beginning of the month.
Pakman urged builders to meet it with better tools.
“It’s up to us in crypto to build products that allow the expression of risk in more transparent ways, that are more fair, have lower fees, and can be more transparent to both disclose risk and payout abilities,” he said.
Crypto World
BlackRock exec says even a 1% crypto allocation in Asia could unlock $2 trillion in new flows
Even a modest model portfolio allocation to crypto in Asia could drive massive inflows into the market, according to Nicholas Peach, head of APAC iShares at BlackRock.
Speaking on a panel at Consensus Hong Kong, Peach said rising institutional acceptance of crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs) — particularly in Asia — is reshaping expectations for the sector.
“Some model advisors are now recommending a 1% allocation to cryptocurrencies in your standard investment portfolio,” Peach said. “If you do some fun math… there’s about $108 trillion of household wealth in all of Asia. So you take 1% of that… and that’d be just south of $2 trillion of inflows into the market, which is what, 60% of what the market is now?”
Peach emphasized the point as a way to frame the scale of capital sitting on the sidelines, especially in traditional finance. A small shift in asset allocation models, he argued, could have an outsized impact on the future of digital assets — even if adoption remains conservative.
BlackRock’s iShares unit is the world’s largest ETF provider, and it’s played a central role in bringing regulated crypto access to traditional investors. The firm launched its U.S.-listed spot Bitcoin ETF in January 2024. That fund, known as IBIT, became the fastest-growing ETF in history, now with nearly $53 billion in assets under management.
But according to Peach, the boom isn’t just a U.S. story. Asian investors have made up a significant share of flows into U.S.-listed crypto ETFs. “There’s actually been a boom in ETF adoption more broadly in the region,” he said, noting that more investors are turning to ETFs to express views across asset classes — not just crypto, but also equities, fixed income, and commodities.
Several markets in Asia, including Hong Kong, Japan, and South Korea, are moving toward launching or expanding crypto ETF offerings. Industry observers expect those regional platforms to deepen as regulatory clarity improves.
For BlackRock and other asset managers, the next challenge is to match product access with investor education and portfolio strategy.
“The pools of capital that are available in traditional finance are unbelievably large,” Peach said. “It doesn’t take much in terms of adoption to lead to really significant financial results.”
-
Politics3 days agoWhy Israel is blocking foreign journalists from entering
-
Sports5 days agoJD Vance booed as Team USA enters Winter Olympics opening ceremony
-
NewsBeat2 days agoMia Brookes misses out on Winter Olympics medal in snowboard big air
-
Business3 days agoLLP registrations cross 10,000 mark for first time in Jan
-
Tech5 days agoFirst multi-coronavirus vaccine enters human testing, built on UW Medicine technology
-
Tech17 hours agoSpaceX’s mighty Starship rocket enters final testing for 12th flight
-
NewsBeat3 days agoWinter Olympics 2026: Team GB’s Mia Brookes through to snowboard big air final, and curling pair beat Italy
-
Business3 days agoCostco introduces fresh batch of new bakery and frozen foods: report
-
Sports3 days agoBenjamin Karl strips clothes celebrating snowboard gold medal at Olympics
-
Sports4 days ago
Former Viking Enters Hall of Fame
-
Politics3 days agoThe Health Dangers Of Browning Your Food
-
Sports5 days ago
New and Huge Defender Enter Vikings’ Mock Draft Orbit
-
Business3 days agoJulius Baer CEO calls for Swiss public register of rogue bankers to protect reputation
-
NewsBeat5 days agoSavannah Guthrie’s mother’s blood was found on porch of home, police confirm as search enters sixth day: Live
-
Business6 days agoQuiz enters administration for third time
-
Crypto World1 day agoBlockchain.com wins UK registration nearly four years after abandoning FCA process
-
Crypto World2 days agoU.S. BTC ETFs register back-to-back inflows for first time in a month
-
NewsBeat2 days agoResidents say city high street with ‘boarded up’ shops ‘could be better’
-
Sports2 days ago
Kirk Cousins Officially Enters the Vikings’ Offseason Puzzle
-
NewsBeat6 days agoStill time to enter Bolton News’ Best Hairdresser 2026 competition

