The story of Stacey Hyde features on Channel 4 documentary The Accused: Beyond Reasonable Doubt, on Thursday night
A new true crime documentary will explore the story of Stacey Hyde, who was jailed for killing her best friend’s boyfriend when she was a teenager.
Stacey’s story features in the second episode of the new Channel 4 series The Accused: Beyond Reasonable Doubt. It will air on Thursday night (June 25) at 10pm.
The new series tells the stories of people fighting convictions that they believe are a miscarriage of justice. After years in prison they attempt to overturn their guilty verdict. Episode one examined Jason Moore, who was sent to prison in 2013 for the murder of his ‘close friend’ Robert Darby.
Click here to get the biggest stories straight to your inbox in our Daily Newsletter
The synopsis for episode two reads: “In 2009, 17-year-old Stacey Hyde was arrested for killing her best friend’s boyfriend. She stabbed him to death after a drunken fight in his flat. Stacey insisted she was defending herself and her friend. But as her criminal charge reached court, the jury saw differently and found her guilty of murder.
“Those close to Stacey stood by her and searched for a way to prove that she acted in self-defence. Could the charity Justice for Women offer a way out? Stacey Hyde’s case is one of many in which women who kill are imprisoned for murder, even though the courts may not have fully examined the circumstances that led to the event.”
Stacey was jailed at the age of 17 for stabbing Vincent Francis, 34, the partner of her friend Holly Banwell, to death. She was sentenced to a minimum of eight years in prison.
At Stacey’s original trial in 2010, the jury heard there had been 27 incidents of domestic violence between Francis and Ms Banwell. Evidence was also provided that Francis had been violent towards a previous partner.
When the police arrived to arrest Stacey following the incident in the Somerset city of Wells, she aid: “He tried to kill me … I had to help Holly.”
Spending five years behind bars, campaign group Justice for Women worked hard to get Stacey a retrial. Once it occurred, she was cleared of the murder.
The jury at the retrial believed that Stacey had acted in self-defence and was released immediately. Jurors were played a call from Ms Banwell, where she told police that her boyfriend was ‘smashing, beating up my friend’.
Once she left prison, Stacey changed her name to Anastasia Darlison and moved to Cornwall from Bristol to start fresh. During her time in prison, Stacey was diagnosed with PTSD, having already struggled with bulimia nervosa, hepatitis C, kidney failure and drinking alcohol to excess.
Stacey developed a significant cocaine and alcohol problem. She died at the age of 32 in April 2024, nine years after she was released from prison. During her inquest, held on May 1 2025, it was said that she ‘fell in with the wrong crowd’ and took drugs and alcohol to excess ‘to cope with what happened in her earlier life’.
A statement read out in court on behalf of her mum her mum Diane, said: “At 17 she killed a man and was convicted of murder and was sentenced to spend a minimum of eight years in prison. After a campaign for her release, she appealed and was found not guilty of murder due to self-defence and was immediately released.
“She had spent five years in prison and she didn’t cope well after her release and turned to a life of prostitution, self-harm, drugs and alcohol. She suffered from bulimia too.”
Her inquest heard that in the years leading up to her death, Ms Hyde was admitted to hospital 11 times, including when she suffered two cardiac arrests. Her cause of death was recorded as bulimia nervosa.
Speaking ahead of the documentary, Harriet Wistrich, CEO of Centre for Women’s Justice, stated: “Miscarriages of justice are commonly understood to be cases where the wrong person was prosecuted and convicted of an offence, sometimes serving many years in prison for a crime they did not commit – like the recent case of Andrew Malkinson, who served seventeen years for a rape he did not commit.
“However, many women are convicted of the murder of their partner where, like Stacey, they accept their actions caused the death but maintain that they were not guilty of murder, either because they acted in self-defence or because they were only partially culpable due to significant mitigating circumstances and should have been convicted of manslaughter, not murder.
“CWJ is currently reviewing over 30 cases where women were convicted of the murder of their abusive partner or of a man who attacked them. We are helping women appeal where possible and making detailed submissions to the Law Commission’s consultation on homicide, arguing that women suffer systemic sex discrimination within the criminal justice system because they are judged according to laws designed for men.
“The law is not fit for purpose when it fails to properly take into account domestic abuse and the structural inequality between men and women.”


.jpg)
You must be logged in to post a comment Login