Former Dallas Cowboys cheerleader Reece Weaver had the support of her husband, Will Allman, when she ultimately — and surprisingly — decided to retire from the iconic squad. 

“No matter what decision I had, he was just going to support either way,” Weaver, 24, exclusively told Us Weekly of her husband’s role in her decision earlier this month. “I always go to him for options and outcomes. He could kind of process what we could do if we went this way, and what we could do if we went the other direction.”

She added, “He’s just super supportive and has helped me try to navigate what to do.”

Weaver’s retirement announcement came at the end of season 3 of Netflix’s America’s Sweethearts: Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders, which premiered June 16. 

Related: DCC‘s Kleine Powell Addresses Social Media Backlash to Kelli Finglass Drama

Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders veteran Kleine Powell has heard all of the chatter about the feedback she gets from DCC director Kelli Finglass — but she thinks some fans are missing the point.  “We have such a mom-and-daughter relationship that I think a lot of people forget about,” Powell, 26, exclusively told Us Weekly on Tuesday, […]

In addition to a major shift in her professional life, Weaver and Allman recently relocated to his home state of Alabama as they usher in a new era of their relationship. 

“We haven’t really experienced what newlywed living is like,” Weaver explained. 

She and Allman got married in April 2024, shortly after her first season on the team and just two months before the premiere of season 1 of America’s Sweethearts.

“We can’t go back and change what has come up and what our new reality looks like. I think that’s special,” Weaver said. “In the beginning I was like, ‘What are we doing? What is going on? How do we navigate all of this?’ But I think it has ultimately made our marriage stronger and our relationship stronger. I’m just excited to carry that into the next season of our lives.”

Weaver explained that she didn’t definitively make up her mind regarding her retirement until March, but admitted the idea to put away the signature white boots was a lingering thought throughout the year. 

Related: Kelli Finglass Reveals Status With Bramhall Family After Cutting Dayton Again

Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders director Kelli Finglass revealed where her relationship stands with associate choreographer Shelly Bramhall after cutting Shelly’s daughter, Dayton, for the third consecutive time.  “We are still standing,” Finglass, 61, exclusively told Us Weekly on Tuesday, June 23. “Shelly is still reporting to work and contributing in a big way. She always has. […]

“Going into season 3, my third year on the team, I just had so much gratitude,” she told Us. “My cup was filled to the brim even going into this year. I had that in the back of my mind. I was excited and looking forward to year three and what it brought. But my cup was getting really, really full. I went into my last game not thinking and knowing it was my last, but I kind of treated it as it was my last, so I could really just soak it all in. I think I really needed that sense of closure for my mental state.”

Thank You!

You have successfully subscribed.

Despite the clarity, Weaver admitted it was still terrifying to break the news to DCC director Kelli Finglass and choreographer Judy Trammell. 

“I don’t remember the last time I was that nervous to go into a conversation,” Weaver recalled. “I wasn’t nervous about really telling them, it was more me actually saying it out loud.”

America’s Sweethearts: Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders is available to stream now. 

There’s something about Millie Bobby Brown. 

Brown’s fabulous style status includes everything from flirty frocks, darling dresses, chic separates and more. 

For the 2018 Screen Actors Guild Awards, Brown looked pretty in a pink sequined Calvin Klein mullet dress, which she paired with white Converse sneakers. Her bow-adorned space buns and rosy lips finished the playful look. 

Thank You!

You have successfully subscribed.

Advertisement

In April 2022, Louis Vuitton named Brown as a brand ambassador. “I met [creative director] Nicolas Ghesquière six years ago and have been a fan of his work with Louis Vuitton ever since,” she said in a statement at the time, per Women’s Wear Daily.

Brown again showed off her glamorous side in November 2025, at the Stranger Things season 5 finale premiere. For the screening, she stunned in an off-the-shoulder sheer Rodarte look.

Keep scrolling to see Brown’s best fashion moments of all time: 

By Jonathan Klotz
| Updated 21 seconds ago

Sci-Fi movies are risky. Whey the hit, you end up with a generational hit that will make billions of dollars. When they fail, well they cost a lot of money so hundreds of people will likely lose their jobs and end up begging for loose change outside Skywalker Ranch. And these are the sci-fi movies that flopped so hard, they destroyed entire companies. 

10. Pandorum (Overture Films)

John Carpenter’s The Thing was a box office flop. Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner was also a box office flop. It can take time for great sci-fi to find the right audience. That’s where Pandorum is right now. It’s destined to become a cult classic. Starring Dennis Quaid and Ben Foster, Pandorum is about humanity’s attempt to colonize another world, except everything goes horribly wrong and instead there’s generations of insane cannibals running around a massive spaceship. It’s dark and it’s disturbing. It’s too much for mainstream audiences to handle. 

Pandorum crashed and burned in theaters in 2009, but thanks to a massive web of distribution deals, its impact was limited to bankrupting only one company: Overture Films. Launched by Starz in 2008, the company was gone in 2010, finding no success with Pandorum, The Crazies, Righteous Kill, and Law-Abiding Citizen among others. Pandorum was the one that launched the killing blow.

By being unable to earn back its production budget of $33 million. Sci-fi horror is always a tough sell, and you have to wonder, who did they expect to watch Pandorum? Is there an audience for sci-fi horror? Overture Films distributed Pandorum to American audiences, and if there is a fanbase for this type of horror, it’s not there. 

The film had the most success in Germany, the home of production company Constantin Films, still around today, and they’re behind the next Resident Evil movie. Constantin has been in business for over 75 years. Overture didn’t even make it to 2 years. The movie business can be like that, especially when you’re making sci-fi. Some days you’re the guy stepping out of a cryopod into safety, and some days you wake up from hundreds of years of hibernation to be eaten by cannibals. 

9. Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within (Squaresoft)

A full-length computer-animated feature film for adults that includes an all-star voice cast describes half a dozen movies a year at this point, but back in 2001, Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within blew everyone’s mind. The first film produced by the legendary video game company Squaresoft at their brand new, multi-million dollar Hawaiian studio turned out to be Square Studios’ last film. Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within has nothing to do with the franchise. There’s no Chocobos, no Summons, no spiky hair, and no addictive card games. 

Instead of adapting the massively popular Final Fantasy 7, or the best game in the series, Final Fantasy 6, Squaresoft crafted an original story about a planet ravaged by glowing red ghosts that kill humans with a single touch. Alec Baldwin voices Captain Gray Edwards, Ming Na-Wen is Dr. Aki Ross, Donald Sutherland is Dr. Sid, the only reference to, you know, Final Fantasy. Ving Rhames, Steve Buscemi, and James Woods also lend their voices to the story four-years and $137 million dollars in the making. 

Bringing in $85 million at the box office wasn’t enough to clear the immense production budget, and that’s without even talking about marketing. Squaresoft quickly changed its mind about making movies and shuttered Square Studios within months of the film’s colossal failure. Facing bankruptcy, Squaresoft was kept alive by Sony purchasing a stake, setting the stage for a merger with Enix, the company’s primary competitor. This failure at least led to one of the best video game companies today, and to be totally honest, Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within is a better movie than you remember. 

8. Treasure Planet (Disney)

Robert Louis Stevenson’s Treasure Island is a classic. John Musker and Robert Clements were the directors behind the Disney Renaissance, crafting The Little Mermaid, Aladdin, and Hercules, when they asked Disney to let them make their dream project: Treasure Planet.  It’s Treasure Island, but in SPPPPAAAACCCCEEEE. 

Joseph Gordon-Levitt was a rising star, David Hyde Pierce was a star, and the voice cast even included the legendary creator of The Prisoner, Patrick McGoohan, in his final performance, as Billy Bones. There was no way this film was going to fail. 

And then it did. 

Treasure Planet barely passed the $100 million mark worldwide, not even coming close to the $140 million spent on production. Looking back, it’s a mystery why a film this fun and this gorgeous failed. Unless you look at the calendar. Treasure Planet debuted on Thanksgiving, 2002, that put it up against Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets from two weeks before, and then the Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers two weeks later. 

Well that and, by 2002, traditional, hand-drawn animation was on the way out. CGI was the hot new thing, Treasure Planet combined both, but back in 2002, it didn’t have the visual appeal of say, Shrek. That was Disney’s take-away, leading to the studio disavowing traditional, 2D animation in favor of 3D. It was the end of an era, and technically, not the bankruptcy of a studio, but it was Disney’s biggest flop up to then, and putting the nail in the coffin of the animation style that defined countless childhoods is the worst possible outcome. 

Seriously, go watch Treasure Planet. 

7. Titan A.E. (Fox Animation Studios)

This one hurts to this day. 

If you don’t know the name Don Bluth, you know his work. He’s the master animator behind Dragon’s Lair, All Dogs Go To Heaven, The Secret of NIMH, and the best non-Disney Princess movie ever, Anastasia. Bluth went on a 20 year revenge campaign against Disney following creative differences with the post-Walt Disney leadership team. That all came to an end in the year 2000 with Titan A.E. 

Years after humanity is forced to wander the stars following the destruction of Earth at the hands of the Drej, Cale Tucker, the holder of a magical ring that leads to the resting place of the Titan, is recruited by the crew of the Valkyrie to find the ship, stop the Drej, and save humanity. They come across alien planets, human space stations, betrayal, and a final fight against the Drej with the fate of the galaxy at stake. And since it’s a Don Bluth movie, every single frame of Titan A.E. is a work of art from beginning to end. 

The problem is that every single cent of the film’s budget is right there on camera. Fox Animation Studio brought Bluth’s vision to life, but it cost them … everything. Fox lost $100 million on Titan A.E., leading to the firing of 300 members of the studio followed soon after, by the entire studio being shuttered. This was a massive blow to Fox right before the CGI animation boom. 

Sci-fi is always a tough sell to general audiences and Titan A.E. was no exception. It never found an audience during its theatrical run. The film remains Don Bluth’s last theatrical release, and the first sign of Fox’s future collapse. 

6. Mars Needs Moms (Robert Zemeckis)

Who Framed Roger Rabbit? is a classic. It’s a singular achievement that will never, ever be topped. And even then it’s still behind Robert Zemeckis’ best film, Back to the Future. In the 80s, Zemeckis couldn’t fail. After 2005 though, Zemeckis discovered CGI, and he couldn’t make a hit to save his studio. 2011’s Mars Needs Moms is one of the worst movies of all time, and it caused ImageMovers Digital to lay off over 400 people and cease all operations as an independent studio. 

Mars Needs Moms has a plot but really, it’s all there in the title. The Martians need human mothers to provide motherness for their nanny-bots which raise the next generation of Martians. It’s a surprisingly dark story given the animation and intended audience: kids. There’s a lot of attempted murder for a story with the message that families are important. 

No one saw Mars Needs Moms in theaters. The film failed to earn even half its production budget of $150 million, becoming the single greatest box office flop for Disney, who co-produced the film with ImageMovers Digital. 

That would become important, as Disney took two lessons from the failure of Mars Needs Moms: sci-fi is a hard sell, and no one wanted to see movies with Mars in the title. That would soon be a problem. 

5. John Carter (Disney. Again.)

John Carter is one of the biggest What-Ifs in sci-fi history. Released in 2012, one year after Mars Needs Moms, Disney dropped “of Mars” from the title, turning it from an obvious sci-fi story into a generic name. John Carter of Mars sounds bold, adventurous, and fun. John Carter does my taxes. It’s a shame that Disney’s horrible marketing campaign sabotaged their own movie. John Carter is a lot of fun. 

The Martian vista stretches on forever, the alien designs are pulled straight out of Edgar Rice Burroughs 1912 novel, Taylor Kitsch is finally the action star Hollywood wanted him to become, and the fight scenes showcase how a regular human could become the deadliest warrior Mars has ever known. There’s a sense of creativity and wonder to John Carter that’s been stripped out of most modern sci-fi. 

John Carter was doomed before it ever hit theaters. At the time, total budget of $350 million made it one of the most expensive films ever made. We don’t know exactly what number it had to reach to turn a profit, but what we do know is that $284 million wasn’t enough. Pulling in 7x times of what Borderlands made in 2024 should have made the film a hit, instead, it’s the box office bomb that forever changed how Disney handles sci-fi. 

Walt Disney Pictures didn’t actually go bankrupt over John Carter, but the sheer amount of money lost made the company swear off original sci-fi. From then on out, Disney was focused on milking Star Wars for every single cent and giving fans a Tron: Legacy sequel that ignored everything awesome about Tron: Legacy. What sci-fi fans lost with the failure of John Carter is the idea that a fun, campy, sci-fi adventure could be a summer blockbuster. 

4. Battlefield Earth (Franchise Pictures)

If I told you that Battlefield Earth bankrupted a production company, you’d be shocked that it was only one company. Back in the year 2000, when the first trailer hit showing John Travolta’s dreadlocked alien, everyone knew this was going to be a disaster. The only question was, how badly was it going to flop? 

Battlefield Earth was a historic flop, losing over $50 million and performing so badly that the FBI investigated Franchise Pictures for fraud. The RICO charges were dismissed, but the studio wound up paying their European distribution partner over $120 million in damages after being found guilty of inflating production budgets. 

Turns out, Battlefield Earth was included as part of a package offer with the Bruce Willis movie, The Whole Nine Yards, and Wesley Snipes’ Art of War. No one wanted to distribute John Travolta’s love-letter to Scientology. 

This is the moment where you’d expect me to say, “but the film really isn’t that bad.” Not this time. Battlefield Earth is one of the worst films in history. Originally a novel written by the founder of Scientology, L. Ron Hubbard, this is one of those times where I can’t even say the book is better. 

It’s not. The book is as bad as the movie. 

Franchise Pictures did go bankrupt after the failure of Battlefield Earth, and the lawsuit that came from it, but they didn’t go out of business. Sadly, the company restructured and continued to help produce and distribute movies. Amazing classics that include Feardotcom, Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever, 3000 Miles to Graceland, and multiple Steven Seagal “Action” movies. 

Somehow, they managed to find a way to make movies worse than Battlefield Earth. 

3. The Golden Compass (New Line Cinema)

The His Dark Materials novels were a huge hit with young adults. The movie The Golden Compass, not so much. Adapting a surprisingly dark tale about the evils of religion was always going to be a challenge, which is why the only thing anyone remembers today is the giant armored bear. Talented director Chris Weitz, who created American Pie and co-wrote Rogue One, did his best, and The Golden Compass featured a stacked cast including Nicole Kidman, Daniel Craig, Christopher Lee, Eva Green, both Ian McKellen and Ian McShane, but even that wasn’t enough for New Line Cinema to turn a profit. 

It would have been, except for one small problem. The Golden Compass wasn’t actually a flop. In the United States it was, but internationally, it was one of the top films of 2007. If the international distribution rights hadn’t been sold, New Line Cinema would have earned over $300 million. 

That little mistake was the final nail in the coffin for New Line Cinema, and the following year, they were merged with Warner Bros. Instead of launching a trilogy, The Golden Compass was one and done. Steampunk sci-fi and fantasy are tough sells on their own, put together and it’s no wonder the general public stayed away. 

The anti-religious messaging of the novels was toned down to the point of being erased which managed to annoy both fans of the books, and the Catholic church, at the same time. The movie itself is okay, there’s a lot worse on this list, but at the end of the day, it’s completely forgettable. 

2. Robot Jox (Empire International) 

You haven’t heard of Robot Jox? The post-apocalypse sci-fi with giant mecha? How could you have never watched Robot Jox? How about the production company it failed to save, Empire International, ring any bells? That’s right, the studio behind the amazing director Stuart Gordon’s low-budget sci-fi horror Re-animator also supported his insane take on Transformers. 

Robot Jox takes place in a future where Earth has been destroyed by a nuclear apocalypse and all wars are settled by giant mech gladiator combat. It’s awesome. You don’t need to know more of the plot; giant mechs fighting it out is always awesome. It might surprise you to learn that a low-budget film about giant mechs didn’t light the box office on fire. 

Before Robot Jox was even released, Empire International had gone into bankruptcy after audiences of the 80s didn’t recognize the company’s greatness with Troll and TerrorVision, delaying the release of Robot Jox for years, until 1990, when no one saw it. Empire International’s schlock is easy to make fun of, but when low-budget productions hit, the profits can be astronomical, which is why the company was able to purchase a European castle in 1985 as the studio’s headquarters. 

1987 was going to be the company’s breakout year, with over 30 films hitting the United States, but like Icarus who flew too close to the sun before plummeting to his death, Empire International went too far, too fast, and by the end of the year, was millions of dollars in debt. Stuart Gordon recovered from his directorial flop and would go on to create even more low-budget horror. His frequent collaborator, Jeffrey Combs, went on to play every alien in Star Trek. 

Robot Jox has been lost to time, and Empire International’s unique filmography would never, ever get made today, but you have to admit, there’s something fun about low-budget sci-fi missing from Hollywood today. 

1. Superman IV (Cannon….they got better!)

Christopher Reeve is the best Superman. The first two films are incredible, but unfortunately, he made four of them. Superman III isn’t great, but it also contains one of the most traumatic scenes of the 80s, which is still better than Superman IV: The Quest for Peace. Oh boy. Where to start with this one? 

If Cannon Films, producers of the film which was only distributed by Warner Bros, had stuck to the Bizarro storyline instead of turning into a parable about the Cold War, this could have been a hit. Instead, Luthor used Superman’s DNA and accidentally created….NUCLEAR MAN. He has the power of the SUN! Which he uses to rake Superman’s back with his fingernails. No really, that’s his big move. He has all the offense of NWO Hulk Hogan. 

By 1987, Cannon Films didn’t have the budget of the Richard Donner films, and it showed on screen. Rapidly running out of money due to multiple flops, including Lifeforce and Masters of the Universe, Cannon Films shoved Superman IV out the door as fast as possible, hoping to get an influx of cash. Earning almost $40 million was decent compared to the barely $17 million budget, but it wasn’t enough. 

Mounting lawsuits, multiple flops, and an investigation by the federal government over fraud, led to Cannon Films becoming part of MGM. Cannon bankrolled a little series you may have heard of, Walker, Texas Ranger, but even that success led to more lawsuits and again, bankruptcy. 

If Superman IV was given the right budget, and a completely different storyline, Bizarro World would have been amazing back in 1987, it could have been a hit and saved the company. Refusing to spend money turned a potential hit into one of the worst superhero films ever made. 

By Zack Zagranis
| Published 21 seconds ago

When making a sequel to a hit movie, there are two ways to go. The first method expands upon the source material while taking it in new, unexpected directions; think Empire Strikes Back, Gremlins 2, and so on. The other way is to remake the first movie but bigger, louder, and with more explosions. The best example of the second method is 1991’s Terminator 2, an all-time blockbuster action extravaganza that holds up shockingly well today.

T2 Improved On The Original

It might sound reductive to call Terminator 2: Judgment Day nothing but a rehash of 1984’s The Terminator, but I challenge anyone to describe the movie in a more accurate and succinct way. Admitting that T2 is just a beefier version of its predecessor in no way diminishes its brilliance.

There’s a reason that Judgment Day is considered by many to be the best sequel ever made. It rocks! Plus, it just might have the best Babyface turn ever put on film. In case you’re not a wrestling fan, that means a bad guy switching to a good guy.

Although in this case, a 400-pound, shotgun-toting cyborg murder machine might be stretching the definition of good guy a little bit.

Time-Travelling Killer Machines

In case you’ve been in a coma for the last 35 years, Terminator 2 follows 10-year-old John Connor (Eddie Furlong) as he dodges an evil liquid robot (Robert Patrick) sent from the future to kill him. Aiding John is another robot (Arnold Schwarzenegger) sent from the future to protect him.

In the first film, Skynet sent a hulking T-800 back in time to assassinate Sarah Conner (Linda Hamilton), whose unborn child, John, is destined to lead a human resistance in the future. The T-800 failed, which is why, this time, Skynet sent the super-advanced T-1000.

The bulk of Terminator 2 is one big chase sequence. The unrelenting T-1000 oozes its liquid metal body after John Connor and the good Terminator as they break John’s mom out of the hospital and flee towards Mexico. Eventually, it catches up to them, and the two Terminators have a knock-down-drag-out slobber knocker at a steel mill.

Landmark CGI

With T2, director James Cameron ushered in a new era of digital special effects, a plague that haunts Hollywood to this day. The difference between Terminator 2, however, and your average CGI schlock on Netflix is that Cameron used computers sparingly and only for the things he absolutely couldn’t do practically.

As a result, the liquid metal effects in Terminator 2 still look good compared to the ugly CGI overkill of a modern action movie like Netflix’s Rebel Moon. I’m probably taking my life into my own hands, mentioning something as beloved as T2 in the same sentence as the vehemently hated Rebel Moon, but oh well, I like to live dangerously.

Terminator 2 Is Still A Top Tier Action Flick

I suppose I should mention just how successful the movie was when it was released, just in case those newly awakened coma patients are still reading. Terminator 2 was a pop-culture juggernaut right out of the gate and continues to be popular even now in its streaming era. At the time of its release, T2 was the third highest-grossing movie of all time.

Even more impressive, the movie got not one but two Sega Genesis games, Terminator 2: Judgement Day and T2: The Arcade Game. Two games for one movie on the same system was unheard of in the 16-bit era and still is today. That’s how big of a deal Terminator 2: Judgement Day was.

As of this writing, Terminator 2: Judgment Day is streaming on Paramount+, and free with ads through Pluto TV.

TERMINATOR 2: JUDGMENT DAY SCORE

By Robert Scucci
| Published 14 seconds ago

Most great satire is misunderstood at first because, more often than not, its subjects buy into it without the slightest hint of irony. I don’t have enough fingers on my hands to count how many people I grew up with posting Tyler Durden or Patrick Bateman quotes on their MySpace profiles to sound edgy and cool, not realizing these men aren’t supposed to be in on the joke; they are the joke. Similarly, Starship Troopers’ satire took a minute to catch up with the masses because the whole thing is supposed to be a scathing indictment of tyrannical governments, nationalism, imperialism, and military might.

I have friends who wanted to, and did, join the Army because they thought Starship Troopers was so cool. Unfortunately, one of the side effects of good satire is that it can be dangerous; the very behavior it’s holding under a magnifying glass to ridicule is often celebrated by people who refuse to read into the subtext.

Which brings us to Uwe Boll’s Citizen Vigilante. It’s banned in parts of Europe, but can now be purchased on-demand in the United States, and it’s an interesting film to say the least. After watching it this past Friday, and thinking about it over the weekend, I can say with 1,000 percent confidence that the film is, without a doubt, a straight-faced satire.

The question that I’ve been asking myself, though, is whether it’s a good satire, or even an effective one, which is no easy question to answer. On one hand, if you read between the lines, everything about this movie is so over-the-top and hyperbolic that I’d be hard-pressed to find any movie lover who wouldn’t pick up on what it was trying to accomplish.

But we also need to consider that most casual viewers won’t be looking at Citizen Vigilante this closely, taking everything it says at face value, meaning that its messaging, as read off the page, is quite dangerous.

Uwe Boll, in my opinion, made a brilliant satire with 2007’s Postal, though I’m sure a lot of you will disagree with me here. Every single character is hateful and loathsome, acting in equally hateful and loathsome ways, and the comedy comes from thinking to yourself, “these jerks are acting like jerks, and then terrible things happen to them because of how they acted.” It’s juvenile, edgy in that eighth-grade gamer kind of way, and offends all sensibilities, but it gives its viewers an out. People can appreciate the satire, and move on without it rocking their world beyond its initial shock value.

Citizen Vigilante, on the other hand, is so deadly serious in its delivery that I could see why and how certain people who have certain extreme beliefs may celebrate everything the movie is trying to dismantle, which is inherently dangerous if left unchecked.

Why Is Citizen Vigilante A Satire?

Citizen Vigilante centers on Armie Hammer’s Michael Sanders, a U.S. citizen living in Europe who takes the law into his own hands without ever experiencing a sliver of doubt that he’s doing the right thing. His primary target is immigrants living in Europe illegally, who, in his mind and many others, are the cause of all of the continent’s violent crimes. Until migration policies are treated more seriously by the powers that be, Michael Sanders makes it known that he will continue to roam the streets, using extreme violence to take the law into his own hands to solve the “problem” once and for all.

Searching for the Citizen Vigilante’s true identity so he can apprehend him is Interpol Regional Chief Henry (Costas Mandylor). It’s worth noting that Henry would like to see reformation on the immigration front, but he’d prefer to do everything by the books. Henry is a man of nuance who recognizes there’s a crime problem, but also understands that better vetting processes can coexist with people legitimately seeking a better life through legal immigration.

Though there are some violent, epic showdowns between these two heavy hitters, here’s why Citizen Vigilante is most certainly a satire: Michael is a violent immigrant.

He’s a U.S. citizen who inherited his late father’s real estate business. When he makes his rounds to inspect his properties, he’s mostly concerned with their value and structural integrity so he can keep making money off of them. When his business partner, Owen (Steffen Mennekes), brings up his citizenship issues, and how some of his properties stand to be seized to be transformed into migrant housing because of them, Sanders refuses to budge, even if it’s exactly what the surrounding communities need to handle their immigration issues in a more peaceful way. 

In other words, Sanders is not a European citizen, and he’s benefiting greatly from Europe’s resources without consequence up to this point.

To make matters worse, some, probably several, of these properties are brothels. If Sanders’ entire goal is to protect women from being assaulted in the streets, which makes them feel unsafe when walking alone, then he lacks any semblance of self-awareness by not realizing that he’s part of the problem. Sure, money changes hands between consenting adults at these brothels, at least from what we’re shown. I have a hard time believing there’s no human trafficking or abuse happening behind closed doors, which makes Michael Sanders complicit in the same kind of societal degradation that he’s profiting from while allegedly fighting against it.

Need More Clues?

Michael Sanders has several workout montages in Citizen Vigilante. Michael Sanders speaks almost entirely in extremist clichés in Citizen Vigilante. Michael Sanders looks at all of the social media posts that praise his “heroic” actions in landscape mode, even though they were clearly filmed and optimized for vertical formats. The dude thinks he’s a chad, but he’s really just a chode.

Michael Sanders communicates through violence, traumatizing God knows how many people in the process, for the sake of what he considers to be justice. Meanwhile, Henry, who will stop at nothing to stop our protagonist from taking the law into his own hands, is the film’s representation of regular people who recognize that most societal issues are systemic, complex, and require biblical amounts of cooperation from all parties to leave the world a better place than it currently is.

The guy you’ve always been supposed to root for in Citizen Vigilante is Henry. The story is told through Michael Sanders’ perspective not because he’s the hero, but because it’s the behavior that Boll wants to hold under a microscope in the most extreme way imaginable.

Is Citizen Vigilante an effective satire? Absolutely. Is it well shot, well acted, and does it get its point across? Yes and no. Personally, I think the satire is clear because almost nobody acts like this. Everybody is a caricature in one way or another, and their decision-making across the board is catastrophic in every conceivable way. I walked away from this movie thinking, “Wow, that Michael Sanders guy is a real jerk,” which I think is exactly the intent of the film.

The problem with satires like Citizen Vigilante, Starship Troopers, Fight Club, American Psycho, and Falling Down is that plenty of viewers will accept them at face value, and that’s where the danger lies.

At the end of the day, I think Citizen Vigilante accomplished what it set out to do. The problem with art is that once it’s let out into the wild, it no longer belongs to the artist. Some people, who will enjoy this movie for all the wrong reasons, will celebrate it because Michael Sanders is what they think is a badass, personified version of their own extreme beliefs. Those willing to peel back its layers will find that the film is actually a blatant criticism of that very mindset.

All that said, is Citizen Vigilante a very good movie? Eh. Just watch Falling Down.

As of this writing, Citizen Vigilante is available on-demand through YouTube, Google Play Movies, Apple TV+, and Fandango at Home.

Cher’s son Elijah Allman and wife Marieangela King have had their share of ups and downs.

The couple met in 2013 and tied the knot that December. Although Allman was sober at the time of their nuptials, he struggled with substance abuse later in their marriage. Cher and King have butted heads over the best way to care for Allman amid his battle with addiction.

In September 2023, King filed a legal declaration accusing Cher of hiring four men to kidnap Allman. She claimed that Allman was then put “in lockdown at a treatment facility” where he was “not allowed to see or speak” to her.

Cher, who shared Elijah with late ex-husband Greg Allman, subsequently addressed the allegations during an October 2023 interview with the New York Post.

Advertisement

Related: Cher’s Family Drama Over the Years

Cher may have had a long and successful career — but not without some of her own personal drama. The Grammy winner dropped out of high school in 1962 to focus on her music and soon after met Sonny Bono. After falling in love — and finding musical success together — the twosome tied the […]

“You never stop being a mom — you go to the end, you go to the mattresses when you’re trying to save your children. But I didn’t do it. And if I did it, I wouldn’t care to tell you,” she said.

Elijah and King have weathered a rocky relationship in the spotlight, filing for divorce twice before reconciling in June 2026.

Keep scrolling for a look at Elijah and King’s relationship over the years:

2013

The pair met when Elijah was in Germany receiving treatment for Lyme disease. They eloped that December.

2014

During a February interview with The Daily Mail, Elijah opened up about his and King’s decision to elope without Cher or other family members present.

“I wasn’t going to wait for anyone’s approval and congratulations, just like I’ve never waited for any of that my whole life. The way I eloped with my wife is the same way I’ve done everything I’ve ever done. I don’t know any other way and we knew it was the right time,” he said.

Elijah added that he has “always been the black sheep” of his family. “We have lots of ups and downs and right now isn’t the best time. Had we been getting on a little bit better maybe it would have been different,” he explained.

2016

King suggested that she and her mother-in-law were on good terms by sharing a photo of them together.

“Backstage w my mamacita,” she captioned the October Instagram snap of herself and Cher.

2018

Elijah and King went to see the jukebox Broadway musical based on Cher’s life story and career.

“About last night … #thechershow on #broadway was inspiring & brilliant! I wanna see it again!” King captioned a December Instagram selfie of herself and Elijah in their theater seats.

August 2021

King shared a selfie with her husband, captioning the shot with a single red heart emoji.

November 2021

Elijah filed for divorce from King after separating in April 2020, citing irreconcilable differences.

December 2022

After Cher’s mom, Georgia Holt, died at age 96 in December, King shared a throwback photo of herself with Holt, Cher and Elijah.

“Coolest pic EVER! #family 🎉🍾🥰🎈,” she captioned the Instagram post.

September 2023

In a legal declaration obtained by Us, King claimed that she and Elijah were at a hotel in New York City in November 2022 when four men “hired” by Cher “removed” Elijah from their room.

King further alleged that Elijah was “currently in lockdown at a treatment facility that is undisclosed” to her, where he had not been “allowed to see or speak” to her. King also noted in the filing that she and Elijah had been attempting to repair their relationship at the time of the alleged kidnapping.

Cher denied the claims during an interview with The New York Post one month later.

December 2023

Cher questioned King’s role in Elijah’s life while filing for a conservatorship of her son, claiming that the twosome’s “tumultuous relationship has been marked by a cycle of drug addiction and mental health crises.”

The Grammy winner further alleged that Elijah is “substantially unable to manage his own financial resources due to severe mental health and substance abuse issues,” hence her request for a conservatorship.

King subsequently shot down the claims in a January 2024 statement to Us, noting that she has “always been a champion for the sober community and for Elijah’s sobriety” while denouncing “establishments that exclude me from being part of Elijah’s treatment and hopeful recovery.”

King also claimed that Elijah had been “coerced under false pretenses” into “an alternative medicine regimen” in October 2023 where he was allegedly “thrown into a lockdown facility in Mexico, sleeping behind a locked cage with six other individuals, under an imposed Mexican Conservatorship.”

Us reached out to Cher for comment at the time but did not hear back.

Related: Famous Family Feuds

Advertisement

From Melissa Gorga and Teresa Giudice to Lindsay Lohan and Michael Lohan, these famous families have had their share of public feuds

January 2024

Elijah and King filed paperwork to dismiss their divorce in January. King’s lawyer Regina Ratner exclusively told Us at the time that the duo had “reconciled” and are “working on their marriage.”

The attorney added that King “has always been [Elijah’s] rock” and “has only been a stabilizing force for him,” despite Cher’s claims in her conservatorship request.

“[Elijah is] very capable of managing his own affairs in his estate, and in periods where he is not as capable, [Marieangela] is more than capable,” Ratner said.

A judge denied the dismissal two weeks after Elijah’s initial filing due to a temporary order for spousal support being in place, according to Page Six. The dismissal was later approved that February.

April 2025

According to court documents obtained by Us Weekly, King filed for divorce from Elijah after more than 11 years of marriage.

In her filing, King cited “irreconcilable differences” as the reason behind the split and listed March 31 as the day of separation.

Because the couple didn’t have any children, there are no custody issues to work through. However, King requested $6,000 per month in temporary spousal support based on marital standard and ability for her estranged husband to pay, per the documents.

“We had a beautiful 13-year journey, filled with memories I’ll always cherish,” Marieangela told TMZ at the time. “I know we’ll remain friends, and Elijah will always hold a special place in my heart. As we turn the page to this next chapter, we kindly ask for privacy and truly appreciate your understanding.”

June 2025

Following Elijah’s reported overdose, King issued a statement to People expressing her support for her estranged husband.

“While it is true that Elijah has faced personal challenges in the past, one constant has been his unwavering commitment to sobriety and his loyalty to those he loves,” she said.

“Like many, he continues to confront his inner struggles — but it is important to recognize that he does so from a place of strength, not defeat,” the statement continued. Despite the assumptions that often color how his journey is portrayed, the reality is that Elijah remains grounded, focused and deeply committed to living with integrity and purpose.”

King added, “I want to state, without hesitation, that I will always root for him. My support is steadfast and comes from a place of deep respect for the person he is and the resilience he continues to show.”

June 2026

King requested her second divorce filing from Elijah be dismissed on June 2, according to court docs obtained by People. The dismissal was granted six days later.

Later that month, King filed a declaration with a Los Angeles court asking to be included in the legal proceedings in connection with the petition filed for Elijah’s permanent conservatorship. (Elijah’s mother, Cher, filed for a second conservatorship amid his highs and lows, but a judge denied the request in April 2026.)

“Elijah and I have experienced challenges within our marriage, many of which were related to his struggles with substance abuse, mental health issues, and the consequences that fall out,” King wrote in the June 22 declaration. “Following his [2025] arrest, I filed a petition for dissolution of marriage. At that time, I was emotionally exhausted, overwhelmed, and believed separation was necessary.”

Thank You!

You have successfully subscribed.

Advertisement

She explained, “Elijah’s placement through the New Hampshire Court system into a structured treatment environment, and my continued concern for his well-being caused me to reconsider the dissolution proceedings.”

King added that upon “further reflection and communication regarding his condition and recovery, I determined that I did not wish to dissolve our marriage.”

“I made Elijah a promise when I married him in 2013 that I would be there for him through sickness and in health, which is why I have fully dismissed my divorce petition without prejudice,” she revealed.

As a woman who rocks a 34G, I’m rather picky about anything strapless. But lately, my willingness to go sans sleeves has increased, thanks to all the supportive strapless dresses I keep coming across. Retailers like Amazon and Walmart haven’t just upped their game (quite literally) with these summer-ready styles; they’re making full-bust support possible with dresses that stay put and flatter bigger busts.

If you, too, could use a little extra support up top, these 19 strapless dresses for bigger busts — from smocked midis, slimming A‑line minis and flowy maxis to ruched bodycons — are the answer to a summer that won’t fall flat on the job. Even better: all these sultry and sophisticated styles are priced under $45.

19 Supportive Strapless Dresses for Busty Figures

1. Our Favorite: With a waist-defining fit, fitted top and ruched back, you don’t have to worry about the girls going anywhere in this striped strapless maxi dress. They’re secure and lifted — the best combination.

2. One & Done: Minimalism never looked so good as this ruched maxi dress. With solid, easy‑to‑match hues and a bust-supportive fit, it’s a staple for a quiet‑luxury lover’s closet.

3. Boutique Ready: As someone who loves to stock up on a good find, I don’t blame shoppers for swooning over this ruched strapless dress. Adorned in solids, a chic gingham print and even stripes, it has that throw-on-and-go polish that’s hard to find.

4. Event-Approved: From weddings to cocktail events, this floral strapless dress packs a punch of style and support. Even better: it makes wearing a strapless bra feel completely seamless.

5. Curve Hugging: Show off your best angles in this bodycon strapless dress that doesn’t give way to gravity. It gives your bust a sensational lift and highlights every curve in the right way.

Related: Yes, These 17 Comfy Maxi Dresses *Actually* Support Bigger Busts

Women with bigger busts know that not all maxi dresses are created equal. Gaping necklines, tight bodices and awkward fits through the chest can quickly ruin an otherwise beautiful dress. Fortunately, a few smart design details can make all the difference. Think supportive smocking, adjustable straps, wrap fronts and silhouettes that create shape without squeezing. […]

Advertisement

6. Take It Easy: Reviewers rave about how well this chic ruched strapless midi stays put. In other words, no tugging, adjusting or second‑guessing your strapless choice.

7. Floral Frock: Thanks to a secure fit and cleverly placed tiers, this floral strapless dress enhances the bust and cinches the waist. It’s a win from every angle.

8. Gingham Girl: This strapless gingham dress is a Southern‑inspired staple. Aside from packing a punch of poise and polish, it’s impressively supportive up top — bra or no bra.

9. Timeless Print: Polka dot has seen a resurgence in popularity lately, and this strapless polka-dot dress is a testament to the style. The smocking doesn’t just make your figure slimmer; it also prevents the top from slipping out of place.

10. A-Line Wonder: Even if you have a fleshier midsection, this strapless A-line mini dress brings balance to your shape. It also keeps busty girls constantly supported.

11. Date Night: One reviewer said they were “pleasantly surprised by how secure and comfortable” this wrap-waist strapless dress fit. Better yet: the fit is so tailored it keeps your top lifted and your figure smooth.

12. Mighty Mini: Leave it to a flirty sweetheart neckline to liven up this black strapless mini dress. With a stretchy, supportive top, it has that fits‑just‑right feel that’s great for busty figures.

13. Flowy Fit: Should you be one for dramatic entrances, consider this tube top maxi dress. Aside from having a stays-put fit up top, it features a flirty, fashionable slit that shows off leg without going over the top.

14. Balancing Effect: Cleverly placed ruffles give this strapless ruched maxi a flattering sense of movement that enhances every curve. One reviewer said the “top provides just the right amount of support while still being comfortable.”

15. Flirty Energy: As a busty girl, it’s understandable to worry about rocking a strapless cocktail dress. This chic number has flowy tiers at the top that disguise any mid‑bust spillage or cleavage you’d rather keep subtle.

16. Off The Shoulder: If a completely strapless dress sounds a bit too daring for your taste, consider this supportive off-the-shoulder maxi dress. It has all the sultry energy of a strapless dress, with added support and a neckline that highlights the shoulders.

17. Plus-Size Pick: Get that hourglass effect in this plus‑size strapless dress. The stay‑put fit hugs from bust to hem, highlighting your shape in all its glory.

18. Neck Support: It can’t hurt to get a little extra support where you need it, and this tie-neck strapless dress does the job and then some. The summer-ready frock keeps things supported up top and breezy everywhere else.

19. Expensive-Looking: I love a customizable look, and this smocked floral dress is one of them. You can push the sleeves off the shoulder for a classic summer vibe, or move them up to keep a more traditional, bra‑friendly silhouette.

Related: Large Bust? We Found 18 Flowy Maxi Dresses That Flatter Without Squeezing

Advertisement

Finding a maxi dress that flatters a larger bust can feel like a challenge — but it doesn’t have to be. The right cut highlights your shape without sacrificing comfort, and certain details (like wrap fronts, smocked bodices or flowy V-necks) are especially flattering while still feeling effortless. Best of all, these dresses offer that […]

Sponsored content. Us Weekly receives compensation for this article as well as for purchases made when you click on a link and buy something below.

If your credit card balances seem impossible to pay off no matter how much you send every month, you’re not alone.

Millions of Americans are carrying high-interest debt that keeps growing faster than they can realistically pay it down. Between rising living costs, inflation, and record credit card APRs, many households are now looking for alternatives before things spiral further.

What many people don’t realize is that hardship-based debt relief programs exist specifically to help consumers dealing with overwhelming unsecured debt.

TruePath Relief Program

The TruePath program is a private initiative designed to help qualified Americans dealing with overwhelming unsecured debt.

More than 3,000,000 Americans have already enrolled, with many consumers reporting they were able to reduce or resolve debt faster than expected.

The process starts with a short online qualification check, and checking eligibility does not impact your credit score.

Why So Many Americans Feel Stuck In Debt

The biggest problem for most people isn’t just the balance itself, but the interest.

Many consumers end up making monthly payments for years while barely making progress because interest charges continue stacking on top of existing balances.

For those dealing with financial hardship, some programs may help reduce monthly payments, lower interest, or even resolve debt for less than the full amount owed.

Check If You Qualify

Unlike many debt relief programs that require at least $10,000 in debt, this program may accept balances starting at just $3,000.

The process is simple:

Complete a quick 2-minute questionnaire and see if you may qualify for lower payments, reduced interest, or debt settlement options. If eligible, you’ll be connected with a debt specialist to review your options.

As credit card debt and interest rates continue rising nationwide, more Americans are turning to debt relief programs before their balances grow even larger.

Some consumers may qualify to reduce a portion of what they owe and become debt-free faster.

There’s no downside to checking, and seeing if you qualify will not affect your credit score.

[See if you qualify now]

THIS IS AN ADVERTORIAL AND NOT AN ACTUAL NEWS ARTICLE, BLOG, OR CONSUMER PROTECTION UPDATE

If you qualify for a debt relief program, your individual results will vary. Settlement estimates and testimonials are examples of past performance only and are not intended to be a guarantee of future results. Program fees and commitment length under informal settlements will also vary dependent on the amount that your debt can be reduced and your ability to save funds. truepathrelief.com does not assume or pay any debts, provide legal advice or offer credit repair services. If you need legal advice you must consult with a licensed attorney. On completion of our form, we may introduce you to one of our debt relief partners using the contact details you have provided to us. If so, we may receive compensation for this introduction. Your credit rating may be affected by entering into a debt relief program. Please read and understand all terms & conditions prior to enrolment. truepathrelief.com does not accept liability or responsibility and it gives no warranty as to the accuracy of information on this website or that provided by our debt relief partners. May not be available in all states. If you have any questions regarding this advertisement, please contact us at support@debthardshiprelief.com. Our office is located at 9205 West Russell Road, Building 3, Las Vegas, NV 89148, USA