Security teams log 54% of successful attacks and alert on just 14%. The rest move through your environment unseen.
The Picus whitepaper shows how breach and attack simulation tests your SIEM and EDR rules so threats stop slipping by detection.
With iPhone Air 2 rumored to be less than a year away, Apple could turn to better cooling or more cameras to make the ultra-thin phone even more popular than the original. Here’s what’s been rumored, and some other possibilities.
Despite what some vocal online detractors say, iPhone Air has its fans. I’m certainly counted among them.
Early reports said Apple’s thinnest phone was a “failure” and that the second-generation was cancelled. Now that we’re three-quarters of the way through the iPhone Air first-year release cycle, it’s more evident that the phone isn’t a “failure” and a second-generation model is coming.
The iPhone Air is said to be twice as popular as the outgoing iPhone 16 Plus it replaced in the lineup. So it’s not all that shocking to see Apple doubling down on the model.
I think there are a few changes that Apple could implement to generate more fans, and based on the latest rumors, it seems Apple could be on the right track.
Here’s how my time with iPhone Air has been and what features version 2 should adopt.
With day-to-day use, there’s not much iPhone Air falls short on. It is fast, comfortable, and the battery gets me through the day.
What I do start to notice is when I’m taxing the processor for prolonged periods of time, the top (where the guts of the phone live) can get quite hot. I know I push the phone a bit more than most people, but it’s definitely noticeable.
I know the performance can be boosted with better thermals for tasks like video exports or gaming. To combat this, Apple should add vapor chamber cooling as found on the pro line.
This would not only improve the general performance of the phone, but could help with other features, too. It’s possible that the iPhone Air lacks Cinematic Mode because of the cooling situation on the device, but unless Apple says something, we may never know.
The second thing I’d love to see is a secondary speaker. Currently, iPhone Air has a mono speaker situated at the top of the phone.
At first, I didn’t mind this. In fact, it can be beneficial at times because depending on how you hold your phone, there’s no bottom speaker to be blocked by your finger.
Most videos I watch on mobile are vertical, while actual landscape videos I save for my iPad or television. But after a lot of recent traveling, I’ve been watching more landscape videos on my iPhone Air and that mono speaker is very noticeable.
This is also one of the most common complaints I see in the comments regarding iPhone Air. To make the second go around better, a second speaker needs to be added.
My final request is for a second camera, but not for the same reason that most others want it. Most probably want an ultra-wide lens for capturing new perspectives with photos.
On the other hand, I want the secondary camera to capture spatial content. Two cameras are necessary to capture that stereoscopic spatial footage.
For the past couple of years, I’ve captured a lot of photos and videos to use with Vision Pro. The iPhone Air lacks this capability due to its solo primary camera.
Obviously the Apple Vision Pro isn’t a major hit among consumers. Spatial is something Apple is still heavily invested in, one way or another.
I want to capture spatial content now, versus in the future. These are moments and memories I can’t get back, so if I have the opportunity to capture a few spatial scenes, I want to do that.
There are questions on how this would work on the iPhone Air 2, though. Apple could adopt square sensors, like it did on the front-facing camera with the iPhone 17, but I’m getting into speculation and guessing at that point.
It could be a cool addition though, unlocking portrait or landscape recording in either phone orientation.
There are a lot of rumors around the iPhone Air 2, but it seems some of my requests may come to fruition. What will be interesting is how Apple pulls them off, such as fitting that second camera module into the plateau, as has been rumored.
Don’t expect iPhone Air 2 to be imminent though. The most recent reporting says Apple is planning a split launch for the iPhone 18 cycle.
iPhone Air has been great, but the second generation may have better battery life, a second camera, and more.
We could see iPhone 18 Pro, iPhone 18 Pro Max, and the “iPhone Fold” in the fall of 2026, Expected in early 2027 are the iPhone 18e, iPhone 18, and iPhone Air 2 land in the first half of 2027. I think that timing makes sense and helps push earlier adopters towards the higher-tier phones.
Between improved battery, a second camera, and any other new features, the iPhone Air 2 may prove even more popular than the first time around. Sounds like we’ll find out in the spring.
Samsung’s next generation of foldable smartphones may arrive with significantly higher price tags than their predecessors. According to information shared by Roland Quandt of WinFuture, the upcoming Galaxy Z Fold 8, Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra, Galaxy Z Flip 8, and the Galaxy Watch 9 lineup are all expected to see price increases in Europe when they are unveiled later this month.
While flagship smartphones have steadily become more expensive over the past few years, the leaked pricing suggests Samsung could be taking another sizeable step upward, particularly for buyers opting for higher storage variants.
Samsung is expected to announce its new foldables at its Galaxy Unpacked event on July 22, but retailer information obtained by Roland Quandt and WinFuture has already revealed what European buyers may have to pay. The most expensive device in the lineup will reportedly be the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra, replacing last year’s standard flagship Fold as Samsung’s top-tier foldable. The base 256GB model is tipped to cost €2,199 (approximately US$2,507), representing a €100 (US$114) increase over its predecessor.

The price hikes become much steeper with larger storage options. The 512GB version is expected to retail for €2,399 (approximately US$2,735), up €180 (US$205), while the 1TB model could reach €2,799 (approximately US$3,191), marking a substantial €280 (US$319) increase. Samsung’s clamshell foldable is also expected to become more expensive. The Galaxy Z Flip 8 is tipped to start at €1,299 (approximately US$1,481) for 256GB storage, while the 512GB model could cost €1,499 (approximately US$1,709), reflecting increases of €100 (US$114) and €180 (US$205), respectively.
The biggest surprise is the arrival of the standard Galaxy Z Fold 8, which is expected to debut as a wider foldable positioned below the Ultra model. According to the leak, it will start at €1,999 for 256GB, while the 512GB and 1TB variants are expected to cost €2,199 and €2,599, respectively. Unlike the Ultra, the regular Fold is expected to make compromises in areas such as the camera system, including the omission of a dedicated zoom camera.
Samsung’s smartwatch lineup may also see higher prices. The Galaxy Watch 9 is tipped to start at €409 for the 40mm Bluetooth version, with LTE models commanding an additional premium. Meanwhile, the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 could launch at €749, around €50 higher than its predecessor.

If the leak proves accurate, Samsung’s strategy appears to be clear: position its foldables and wearables even further into premium territory. For consumers, however, that could make the buying decision more difficult, especially as competitors such as Google, Honor, OnePlus, and Vivo continue to push foldable hardware while keeping prices relatively competitive.
None of these prices have been officially confirmed by Samsung, and regional pricing could differ when the devices launch globally. Even so, with just weeks remaining before Galaxy Unpacked, the leak provides one of the clearest indications yet that Samsung’s newest foldables may also become its most expensive.
Haven’t seen anything you like? The following phones are also worth considering:
Xiaomi 17T for £649 and 17T Pro for $870: If it weren’t for Honor’s high pricing, one of these phones (probably the 17T) would have claimed the best mid-range spot above. Compared with the Honor 600, the 17T offers slightly better performance with more RAM and a more reliable camera that has superior zoom capability. Unfortunately, it also has bags of bloatware, and the software requires some tinkering to get the best it offers. The 17T Pro adds wireless charging, a bigger battery, much better performance with a faster chipset, and a larger screen—but it’s even more expensive, pushing the top end of what I’d consider midrange.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Oppo Find N6 for $1,943: Touting an 8.12-inch display, the Find N6 is a beautifully engineered folding phone that’s impossibly slim and light. Despite its promise of being creaseless, the fold is still discernible. You’ll hardly notice it when the screen is on, though you’ll feel it if you use the optional stylus. Performance is impressively slick, with enough stamina to see you through a busy day, and the camera system is excellent. It’s a big step up from last year’s N5, with a 200-MP main shooter, 50-MP telephoto, and 50-MP ultrawide, though it can’t quite compete with the Xiaomi 17 Ultra above. The global model is enabled to use familiar Google apps, but you’ll have to import those, as the phone won’t officially be released in the West, which is the main reason it fails to edge out Honor’s foldable above.
Xiaomi 15T Pro for $745: This phone is fast, with a large, high-refresh-rate screen; a versatile Leica-tuned camera system that includes a 50-MP telephoto lens offering 5X optical zoom; and a solid list of extras, including generous and speedy UFS 4.1 storage and Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6 connectivity. The big downside here for most folks is the quirky software, but with a bit of effort, it’s possible to customize it into shape. There’s also some bloatware to remove, and Xiaomi doesn’t match some competitors on software support. The regular 15T is almost the same size but has a slightly weaker chipset and camera, a plastic frame, and misses out on wireless charging.
Infinix Note 60 Ultra for $750: Designed with the help of Pininfarina, famous for iconic cars from Ferrari and Maserati, the Note 60 Ultra looks interesting, with a distinctive curved glass section over the camera module that also houses a small matrix display. The phone arrives in a grand box with a curvy car-shaped wireless charger. The specs are solid, apart from the distinctly not “Ultra” chipset (MediaTek’s Dimensity 8400 Ultimate), but availability seems limited for now.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max for $1,039: A refreshing design featuring a second, smaller screen on the back that houses the camera lenses is the main way the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max differs from the 17 Pro. Xiaomi came up with various cute ways to employ this auxiliary display, including a selfie preview for superior selfies with the main camera, music controls, customizable themes, and virtual pets. There’s even a retro gaming case that lets you play Angry Birds, though it feels a bit silly when there’s a 6.7-inch screen on the other side. Aside from the second screen, the 17 Pro Max is a typical Xiaomi specs beast, and the 17 Pro isn’t far behind, but neither has been officially released outside China yet.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Oppo Find X9 Pro for £1,099: Photography fans simply must check out the Oppo Find X9 Pro. The 200-megapixel telephoto lens supports 3X optical zoom and can take excellent shots at 6X zoom by cropping images down to 50 megapixels. To maximize camera capabilities, though, you’ll need the detachable Hasselblad Teleconverter Kit ($399). This enormous lens slots into place on the case and adds another 3.28X zoom, though it’s tricky to use without a tripod. An additional trio of 50-MP lenses, with all supporting 4K video recording at 60 fps with HDR, makes this a great pick for creatives. Impressive specs include a 6.78-inch flat display, IP66/68/69 ratings, and a 7,500-mAh silicon-carbon battery that’ll last for two days.
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra for £497 and F8 Pro for £331: Xiaomi’s cheaper, fun, youthful brand Poco provides room for experimentation, but the company’s own 15T Pro is a better buy in this price bracket. What the F8 Ultra offers that you won’t find elsewhere is a fun or awful (depending on your tastes) denim finish on the back. There are also Bose-tuned speakers, an excellent 6.9-inch display, and an enormous 6,500-mAh battery. It also has a flagship-level Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and generous RAM and storage. There’s even a trio of 50-MP lenses in the camera. The F8 Pro is slightly smaller but drops little from the spec sheet, making it the better bargain.
Honor Magic 7 Pro for $999: Honor’s Magic 7 Pro features a solid triple-lens camera, a gorgeous 6.8-inch screen, speedy performance, good battery life, and a dual IP68 and IP69 dust- and water-resistance rating. Honor’s Magic OS boasts polished AI features, and Honor announced an increased commitment to seven years of Android version and security patch updates with this phone. The Magic 7 Pro’s downsides include its large camera cutout on the front, camera processing that’s sometimes heavy-handed, and its ultrawide camera struggling to match the other two lenses.
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro for $403: Xiaomi’s Poco X7 Pro is a compelling bargain that combines a lovely 6.67-inch display with relatively fast performance, good battery life, speedy wired charging, and IP68 water resistance. The 50-megapixel main camera is decent. The Poco X7 Pro runs Android 15 with HyperOS on top, and Xiaomi offers three Android version updates and four years of security patches. This was my budget pick before the Poco F7 (discontinued), and then the X8 Pro unseated it.
Doro Aurora A20 for £250: Doro is a Swedish company focused on providing devices that are accessible for older folks. It primarily focuses on phones but also sells a decent video doorbell. The Aurora A20 is an odd spin on the flip phone that may help some people transition to a touchscreen device. It’s like an old candy bar HTC Android phone with a flip-out keypad attached to the bottom. There are lots of thoughtful features, including an alarm button, a spacious keypad, and simplified software. It’s also fairly cheap, but I found the performance sluggish, the camera poor, and the design a bit chunky and heavy.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Realme 14 Pro+ for €369: The color-changing finish may be gimmicky, but it’s fun, and this phone looks and feels far more expensive than it is. There are more highs than lows on the spec sheet: You get a triple-lens camera, an IP68/69 water-resistance rating, a 6,000-mAh battery, and a 6.83-inch OLED display with a 120-Hz refresh rate. But the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chipset is limited, there’s no wireless charging support, and you don’t get a charger in the box. Even so, it’s still quite a bargain.
Xiaomi 15 for $750: Folks seeking a compact phone could do a lot worse than the Xiaomi 15. It feels lovely and has a 6.36-inch screen, a decent triple-lens camera, and top-notch internals. But it’s a conservative design, and it has software and bloatware issues.
Honor Magic 7 RSR for £1,550: Designed with Porsche, this souped-up version of the 7 Pro above has a fancier design with a hexagonal camera module, a slightly improved telephoto lens, 24 GB of RAM (likely largely pointless), 1 TB of storage, and a bigger battery (5,850 mAh). It’s lovely, but it doesn’t do enough to justify the additional outlay.
These aren’t necessarily bad phones, but I think you’d be better served by an option above.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite: There’s a retro-cool vibe to Nothing’s translucent hardware and pixelated software, and this is currently the cheapest phone it offers in the UK (it wasn’t released in the US). The screen, battery life, and software are decent, but the camera and bloatware were disappointing. I don’t think the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite is the worst, but you can do better.
Nubia Z80 Ultra: Similar to my gaming pick above, the Nubia Redmagic 11S Pro, the Nubia Z80 Ultra trades off a better camera for slightly diminished performance and screen quality. It’s also a real brick with an enormous camera module on the back, making it awkward to handle, though I do like the dedicated camera button. Despite a very impressive spec sheet for the money, it manages to feel like less than the sum of its parts. Nubia’s software is subpar, and for this phone, it commits to only three years of security updates and a single Android version upgrade.
Oppo Reno 13 Pro 5G: This slim, lightweight midrange phone boasts a 6.8-inch screen (brightness is limited), a triple-lens camera (solid 50-MP main and telephoto lenses with a disappointing 8-MP ultrawide), and an impressive IP69 water-resistance rating. Battery life is good, and wired charging is fast, but there’s no wireless charging. It’s packed with bloatware but also AI features and tools covering transcription, summarization, image editing, and more that may add value for some folks. After some time with the 13 Pro, I feel you can do better for the money.
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4: Officially released only in China, the Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 is a stylish folding phone with a 6.56-inch outer screen that folds open to reveal a 7.98-inch inner screen. It also offers solid performance and battery life, but despite having a large quad-lens camera module, the camera is underwhelming. The crease is also pronounced, and using a Chinese model is a bit of a pain, as various items are not translated, and getting the apps you want takes work.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Realme GT7 Pro: This potential flagship killer has a 6.78-inch OLED screen, a Snapdragon 8 Elite chip, and an enormous 6,500-mAh battery. You also get a triple-lens camera, but the 50-megapixel main and telephoto lenses are let down by the 8-megapixel ultrawide. It also lacks wireless charging, and it only seems to be on sale in Germany.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+: Here, you’ll get an attractive and durable design (IP68), a 200-megapixel Samsung camera sensor, and decent battery life with superfast charging (120 watts). But those wins come at the price of middling performance, poor ultrawide (8 MP) and macro (2 MP) lenses, and a ton of bloatware. Ultimately, there’s little improvement over last year’s Redmi Note 13 Pro+. Not only are there better phones for the same money—there are better Xiaomi phones.
Should You Import One of These Phones?
While some phones are not officially sold in the US (or certain other countries), you can still get your hands on them if you’d like. They’re often easy to buy online, and you may even find some on Amazon. But before you buy, you’ll want to consider a few factors.
Phone Model and Supported Bands
The technologies and specific bands upon which cellular networks rely differ from country to country. While models described as “global” and even specifically UK or European models are likely to work in the US, they may not support all the bands your carrier uses. Missing LTE or 5G bands can mean patchy service or even relegate you to 3G. Chinese and other country-specific models will almost certainly lack some common US bands and may not work on some carrier networks.
You will often find this information in the listing or aggregated on websites like Kimovil, but I recommend checking directly with the manufacturer and your carrier.
Customs Charges
Depending on where you buy, importing a phone can lead to customs charges and add a significant expense to the overall cost. Do your research and factor in any extra fees before you buy.
Android and Google Services
It is common for phones released only in China to ship without any Google services, including the Google Play Store. Many Chinese manufacturers have their own app stores or preinstall third-party app stores for the Chinese market. Sometimes it’s a simple case of checking a box to unlock and download Google services, but it’s not always so easy.
Even where Google services are supported, some Chinese phones won’t work properly with certain apps, such as Android Auto. Lack of support can leave you stuck with specific Chinese default apps and services, and many banking apps won’t work as they would on a US or global model.
With regard to Huawei phones in particular, the company developed an independent ecosystem of apps and services following its US ban. The latest models run HarmonyOS. Although it was originally forked from the Android Open Source Project, it is now completely separate, and Huawei phones can no longer run Android apps.
I try to use every smartphone I test as my main phone for at least a week, sometimes longer. I stress-test performance by playing the most demanding mobile games and recording videos at the highest resolution. I make calls to test the smartphone’s microphone and speaker quality.
I often test the camera side by side with a competing phone and analyze the photos on a larger, more color-accurate screen. I’ve been reviewing all kinds of smartphones, from budget devices to flagships, for more than a decade.
Power up with unlimited access to WIRED. Get best-in-class reporting and exclusive subscriber content that’s too important to ignore. Subscribe Today.
A dual United States and Estonian citizen has been extradited to the U.S. to face charges alleging he was a member of the Scattered Spider hacking collective.
19-year-old Peter Stokes (who used the online handles “Bouquet,” “Spencer,” and “Jordan”) was arrested in Finland on April 10 while attempting to board a flight to Japan at Helsinki’s airport and is accused of having helped extort millions of dollars from multiple high-profile companies worldwide.
According to court documents, Stokes was involved in at least four Scattered Spider breaches (including a March 2023 hack of an online communication platform, when he was 16 years old) that led to victim companies being asked to pay millions of dollars in ransoms.
The list of victims breached with the suspect’s help also includes an unnamed multibillion-dollar “luxury item retailer” in May 2025, when the hackers allegedly called the company’s IT helpdesk, posing as employees, to reset credentials and gain access to administrator accounts.
While the threat actors demanded an $8 million ransom, claiming to have 100 gigabytes of stolen data, the company refused to pay. However, it still incurred over $2 million due to operations disruption and remediation costs.
Stokes now faces charges of fraud, conspiracy, and computer intrusion and has remained in custody after appearing in federal court in Chicago on Tuesday.

”The criminal complaint charges Peter Stokes with membership in Scattered Spider, a hacking group that has been involved in over 100 network intrusions, resulting in more than $100 million in ransom payments and millions more in damages to the victims,” said Assistant Attorney General A. Tysen Duva on Wednesday.
“Scattered Spider has repeatedly targeted U.S. companies, extorting employees, inflicting millions of dollars in losses, and disrupting essential operations,” added Assistant Director Brett Leatherman of the FBI’s Cyber Division.
Scattered Spider (also tracked as 0ktapus, Octo Tempest, Scatter Swine, UNC3944, and Muddled Libra) emerged in 2022 as a loosely knit hacking collective mainly composed of teenagers and young adults from the United States and Great Britain.
They are known for using a blend of social engineering, targeted multi-factor authentication (MFA) bombing (aka MFA fatigue), and SMS credential phishing attacks to steal user credentials and sensitive documents for extortion leverage after breaching their targets’ networks.
According to prosecutors, they commonly use the Genymobile Android emulator during their MFA attacks and have also deployed DragonForce encryptor in ransomware attacks against UK retail companies.
Scattered Spider’s list of victims includes many high-profile organizations, including Caesars, MGM Resorts, Riot Games, DoorDash, Reddit, MailChimp, Twilio, Allianz Life, Transport for London (TfL), multiple UK retailers such as Co-op, Marks & Spencer (M&S), and Harrods, and, more recently, WestJet and Jaguar Land Rover (JLR).
Security teams log 54% of successful attacks and alert on just 14%. The rest move through your environment unseen.
The Picus whitepaper shows how breach and attack simulation tests your SIEM and EDR rules so threats stop slipping by detection.
Apple appears to be growing increasingly confident in its first foldable iPhone. A new report claims the company has raised its production plans for the long-rumoured iPhone Fold to 10 million units for the remainder of 2026.
That’s according to Nikkei Asia, which previously reported that Apple was targeting between seven and eight million foldable iPhones this year. The new figure aligns more closely with an earlier 11 million-unit claim from leaker Digital Chat Station.
If the latest estimate proves accurate, it could signal that Apple is preparing for a much bigger launch than many expected.
Previous rumours suggested manufacturing challenges around the foldable display, hinge and internal circuit board could limit production. However, increasing orders would indicate those issues may now be under control.
The report also offers another clue about timing. Since the 10 million figure covers Apple’s 2026 production plans, it adds weight to speculation that the iPhone Fold could still debut alongside the rest of the iPhone lineup in September instead of slipping into 2027. Some rumours have suggested it could be delayed. That said, Apple could still unveil the device this year and delay shipments until later if production runs into problems.
Foldables are also likely to become a much bigger part of the wider market next year. Separate industry estimates suggest Apple’s first foldable could account for 29% of global folding display orders in 2026. This would put it close to Samsung’s projected 31% share and ahead of Huawei’s estimated 24%.
The report arrives alongside broader claims about Apple’s production strategy. The company is said to be planning more than 220 million iPhones across its entire range in 2026. At the same time, Apple is asking suppliers to reserve additional iPhone 17 components to reduce the risk of shortages.
Apple’s launch schedule could also look a little different next year. Rumours continue to suggest the standard iPhone 18 may move from its traditional September slot to spring 2027. This could leave more room for premium models, including the iPhone Fold.
For now, Apple’s foldable plans remain unofficial. But increasing production targets from around eight million to 10 million units suggests the company is becoming more confident. Its first folding iPhone could be one of its biggest launches in years.
Why you can trust TechRadar
We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.
It may not always be among the first brands to get a particular type of product to market, but you can usually rely on Bose to have done a proper job by the time it gets around to it. And on paper, that seems to be exactly what’s happened with this new Lifestyle Ultra Speaker — it’s priced and specified to meet the market-leaders head on, and has one or two points of difference to try and make its case even stronger.
The looks, for instance, are just distinct enough from the usual ‘cylinder of sound’ design to stand out in a showroom. The specification, which includes a 38mm mid/high driver angled to fire upwards through the top of the cabinet, promises authentic spatial audio performance where many a rival relies on digital sound processing in an effort to achieve the effect. And the appearance of Alexa+ as a voice assistant marks the first time a non-Amazon product is using the technology.
One of the best wireless speakers around? Yes, in a word. In practice, the Lifestyle Ultra Speaker has an awful lot to recommend it and immediately becomes a real contender. There’s Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity, with Apple Airplay and Google Cast baked in too. It’s also a punchy, detailed and respectably dynamic listen, can play very loudly indeed if you so desire, and has a definite and well-defined sensation of height to its sound. You’ll need to be into the EQ settings to get treble response balanced out and calmed down, but overall this is an upfront, energetic but not remotely unsubtle performer that deserves a place on even very short shortlists.
The Bose Lifestyle Ultra Speaker is on sale now, and in the United Kingdom it costs £299. Or, at least, it does in either of the black or ‘white smoke’ finishes. If you fancy the Bang & Olufsen-tastic ‘sand’ finish with its natural oak base, you’re looking at £349.
In America it sells for $299 / $349, while in Australia (where the ‘sand’ finish does not seem to be available), the going rate is AU$499.
At this price, the Lifestyle Ultra Speakers’ chief rival in the Bluetooth arena is probably the slightly more expensive (at its regular price, anyway) JBL Xtreme 5. And that’s a five-star speaker, so competition is tough. That said, the Bose you’re reading about offers streaming over your home’s Wi-Fi network too, so in that category, your easy comparison is the Sonos Play.
|
Weight: |
1.66 kg (3.6 lbs) |
|
Dimensions: |
18.5 x 12.1 x 16.8 cm |
|
Battery life (quoted): |
N/A (plug-in only) |
|
Connectivity: |
Bluetooth 5.3 with BLE; Wi-Fi (Google Cast; AirPlay; multi-room) |
|
Drivers: |
Two front-facing drivers ( 1x 3-inch woofer; 1x 1-inch tweeter), plus a 1.5-inch up-firing ‘twiddler’ |
|
Aux-in: |
Yes |
|
Charger port: |
USB-C |
|
Microphone: |
Yes; built-in array |
|
Waterproof rating: |
Not rated |
In most respects, the feature-set of the Lifestyle Ultra Speaker is somewhere between ‘very good’ and ‘very good indeed’ — the features we know about fall into one of those categories, anyway. This is Bose we’re dealing with, of course, which means there are no details whatsoever regarding some aspects of specification forthcoming.
I’m going to go ahead and guess the Lifestyle Ultra Speaker uses Class D amplification, and that there’s an adequate amount of power on board (the ‘sound quality’ section will let you know how I’ve come to this particular conclusion).
What I know for sure is that there’s a three-driver array on board that’s in receipt of this mysterious amplification — a forward-facing 76mm mid/bass driver below a 25mm tweeter, with a 38mm mid/high driver angled up and out through the top of the cabinet.
As for what these drivers are made from, or the frequency response they’re capable of generating, well, your guess is as good as mine. Whatever the frequency response is, though, it’s bolstered by a rear-facing ‘QuietPort’ bass reflex port at the rear of the cabinet.
The port is towards the bottom of the back of the cabinet, just above a 3.5mm line-level analog input that constitutes the Bose’s only physical connectivity.
Wireless stuff is handled by dual-band wi-fi and Bluetooth — the latter is version 5.3 but is only compatible with the bog-standard SBC and AAC codecs, which is a shame when you consider the number of alternatives that are capable of local streaming to a higher standard. Still, Wi-Fi means Apple AirPlay 2, Google Cast and Spotify Connect are all available, with TIDAL Connect promised sooner rather than later.
You make your own mind up when it comes to looks, of course, but for my money the shape of the Lifestyle Ultra Speaker makes a very pleasant change from all those cylindrical speakers that make up the bulk of the competition the Bose faces. The soft, rounded shape is miles ahead of the rather boxy stuff Bose has been turning out before now.
At 184 x 121 x 167mm (HxWxD) the proportions are pleasing, and the speaker is just about compact enough to work happily on a shelf (as long as there’s space above it for the up-firing driver to do its thing, of course). The standard of build and finish is basically impeccable, and there’s even a suggestion of tactility to the plastics Bose has used here. No matter which of the three available finishes you choose (the black of my sample, the ‘white smoke’ alternative that has more than a hint of grey about it, or the cost-option ‘sand’ alternative), the Lifestyle Ultra Speaker looks and feels the part.
The looks are nicely enhanced by the wraparound grille that covers a good portion of the front of the speaker. The fact that it’s notably proud of the main body makes it look very much like it can be detached — but it can’t, so don’t even try. No good can come of it.
First things first: the Bose Lifestyle Ultra Speaker makes good use of its up-firing driver — dial in some ‘height’ in the control app, queue up a FLAC file of Idles’ Never Fight a Man with a Perm, let the ‘TrueSpatial’ processing do its thing, and you get a presentation that’s considerably taller than the cabinet from which it’s coming.
There’s nice even frequency response on display, too — the Bose digs respectably deep, hitting good and hard and the bottom of the frequency range, and the transitions to the midrange and into the highest frequencies is pretty smooth. While it goes out of way to ensure no part of the frequency range is over- or under-represented, the speaker does project the midrange just a little. The ‘V’ shape that results is more of a bump than a spike, though. Control of the bottom end is pretty tight, so the speaker has no real issues in expressing rhythms confidently. Detail levels are high at every stage. The Lifestyle Ultra Speaker is quite an insightful listen, and pays good attention to the more minor details in a recording — the fact that it presents quite a spacious and well-defined soundstage helps to make this obvious.
There’s a good sensation space to the overall sound, and certainly more than enough room for every participant in a recording to get the space in which to operate — but the left/right width of the presentation is quite curtailed in comparison to the height element. The result is a slightly narrow, notably tall sound that’s slightly counter-intuitive right until the moment you get used to it.
The tonal balance is, for the most part, pretty consistent; the Bose is a fairly neutral device in this respect. There’s a slight lack of substance to treble sounds compared to the rest of the frequency range, a tiny hint of toothiness that’s rather at odds with the robust way the rest of the range is presented. It’s nothing a moment or two examining your EQ options can’t mitigate, though.
Add in a reasonable facility with dynamics — the broad stuff about volume and intensity, and the more subtle dynamics of harmonic variation too — and the Lifestyle Ultra Speaker makes a pretty convincing case for itself. Unless, of course, you’re listening to content that simply doesn’t enjoy being forced into a spatial audio presentation. You can minimise the effect of the height channel in the app, but you can’t defeat the ‘TrueSpatial’ processing — and uncooperative recordings can sound just a touch vague where more compliant stuff is quite sharply focused.
As far as ‘setup’ is concerned, the Bose is either mercifully straightforward or rather underpowered — it depends on your point of view. In order to get up and running, it’s simply a question of finding a suitable position for the speaker (Bose will sell you a wall-mount of a dedicated stand, and there’s a thread in the base of the cabinet for use with third-party supports) and plugging it in. Then it’s simply a question of logging into wi-fi and to Amazon in order to activate the voice assistant. There’s no automatic room calibration routine available here (which is distinct from the Lifestyle Ultra Soundbar that launched at the same time), so any tweaks to the performance of the speaker will have to be made in the Bose control app.
The app itself is clean and logical, and as well as some EQ adjustment (plus a slider to increase or decrease the sensation of sonic height) it’s where you can create a stereo pair with a second Lifestyle Ultra Speaker or incorporate your speaker into a home theatre system. Use the Google Home app, meanwhile, and a multiroom system using any and all compatible speakers can very easily be set up.There are some physical controls on the top of the speaker, too.
Capacitive buttons take care of play/pause, volume up/down, Bluetooth pairing, input selection, and waking this voice assistant — there’s a button to defeat the mic too, in case you don’t want Alexa+ to listen out for you.
This is the first non-Amazon product to take advantage of Alexa+ voice control and, while Amazon has kept some smart features for itself, this version works very well indeed. It’s alert to voice prompts, and is rapid in its responses to any questions or instructions you might have.
Obviously there’s no shortage of wireless speakers at this sort of money, and some of them are very good indeed. Spending your money with Bose rather than with, say, brands as credible as Apple, Denon, Sonos or WiiM (to name just a few) does have upsides, though.
Obviously there’s the standard of build and finish, the very pleasant aesthetic and the many positives about the way the Lifestyle Ultra Speaker sounds. But there’s also the open and agnostic nature of its multiroom capability, as well as the welcome and well-implemented appearance of Alexa+ as a voice assistant to be factored in too. So while this is not your only choice, the value for money it offers means it should really be on your shortlist.
I used the Bose Lifestyle Ultra Speaker on a kitchen worktop, a bookshelf, and a dedicated speaker stand. I used an iPhone 15 Pro to stream to it using Bluetooth (given the lack of worthwhile codec compatibility, there didn’t seem much point in getting anything better specified charged up), and I also used the iOS device to listen to Apple Music via AirPlay 2.
Get ready to navigate a free-for-all of social media handles.
Earlier this week, Meta announced that its popular messaging platform WhatsApp would introduce usernames. These handles can replace people’s phone numbers, allowing them to keep that personal contact info more private if they wish. The username feature is not active yet, and it will see a global rollout over the coming months.
However, reservations for usernames are now open, and already there’s been a scramble for people to secure how they want to be known to their friends and family as well as to the app’s broader community. If you want to have the same tag on all your platforms, you’ll want to act quickly. Here’s what you need to know to lock down your WhatsApp username.
For now, the username reservations are only available on the mobile versions of WhatsApp. If you keep your app updated, you may receive a notification when usernames are available for you to reserve. If you think you missed the notification or just want to get to the menu on your own, here are the steps to take:
For iPhone
For Android
As with most other social networks, your username must be unique. That means no matter how much you might want to be known as GlitterQueen4Eva, if someone else snatches that title first, you’ll need to come up with an alternative. The only way you might be lucky enough to grab an already-taken username is if that person opts to change what they have reserved, which can happen. Once a claimed handle has been changed or deleted, that name goes back up for grabs after 14 days. Meta hasn’t specified how many times a person will be allowed to change their handle, but a limit will be applied at some point.
In the above menus, if you don’t want to create a new ID for yourself, you’ll see an option to use your same username from Facebook or Instagram. Assuming nobody else has already snagged it, you can lock that name down. You may want to go with an original name for WhatsApp if privacy is your goal for a username.
In more practical terms, a username must be between three and 35 characters. They can contain lowercase letters, numbers, underscores and periods. You won’t be allowed to have a username of all numbers, and “restricted words or phrases” also won’t be permitted.
Meta has some measures planned to ensure that messages are coming from people you know, such as an authorization key for people contacting you by username for the first time. However, there are concerns that putting unverified names to accounts could increase the odds of scammers convincing their targets that they are somebody else. While Meta won’t be allowing just anyone to claim that they’re Beyoncé or Tim Cook, the company hasn’t explained if or how it will check for copycats. Although it’s safe to assume the real Taylor Swift won’t suddenly message you desperate for money, social media scams have cost unsuspecting people billions of dollars in the US alone.
Meta is already facing pushback against the global rollout in India. Reuters reported that the Indian government is calling for Meta to freeze the rollout until it can provide additional justifications for the feature and how the company will combat the elevated risks of fraud. India is the largest market for WhatsApp with more than 500 million users.
Opera has introduced Paste Protect, a security feature designed to block ClickFix-style attacks that trick users into executing malicious commands through social engineering.
ClickFix is a widely used technique where victims are deceived into copying dangerous code or commands to the clipboard and then executing them in the command-line interface.
Typically, the ruse is a verification process or some form of problem-fixing instructions. However, they are only designed to trick the target into performing dangerous actions.
The commands execute with the user’s privileges, bypassing existing security defenses, and many times lead to the delivery of information-stealer malware.
The method is to popular with threat actors that Apple recently introduced a security feature designed specifically to detect risky pastes in the Terminal and block them before alerting the user.
Opera’s approach with Paste Protect is similar: it blocks harmful commands before they are copied to the browser clipboard.
The new security mechanism leverages Hijack protection, introduced in 2021, which can detect attempts from external applications to replace copied content (e.g., URLs or bank account numbers) with malicious alternatives, as well as a new component called Injection protection.
Injection protection blocks potentially harmful commands before they reach the clipboard, regardless if the action is initiated by the user or a website they visit.
Opera says it uses platform-specific detection rules to scan copied content for patterns commonly associated with malicious scripts and commands, supporting Windows, macOS, and Linux.
When Paste Protect detects suspicious clipboard content, it blocks the copy operation, displays a warning, and shows a red security indicator in the browser’s address bar.
“If a potential threat is detected, the copy action is automatically blocked,” describes Opera.
“You’ll see a popup explaining what happened, and a red warning icon will appear in the address bar.”
In such cases, users can view the first 120 characters of the blocked script, and they can approve the process of copying it after a 5-second timeout.

Users will also have the option to create allow-lists with trusted websites to minimize the friction from repeated blocks by Opera’s new security system.
“If you really know what you’re doing, for example if you’re a developer who regularly copies scripts or commands from trusted sources like GitHub, you can also set trusted websites where it’s allowed to copy scripts by selecting “Always allow from this site” in the popup,” explained Opera.
Paste Protect is enabled by default in the latest Opera release, and users can manage it through Settings → Privacy & Security → Paste Protect.
As a general recommendation, users should avoid executing commands they found online that they don’t fully understand and treat all such prompts with suspicion.
Security teams log 54% of successful attacks and alert on just 14%. The rest move through your environment unseen.
The Picus whitepaper shows how breach and attack simulation tests your SIEM and EDR rules so threats stop slipping by detection.
Scientists working with a United States defense programme are developing compact nuclear batteries intended to supply electricity continuously for several decades.
The effort revolves around radioisotope power systems that convert radiation directly into electricity instead of storing energy through chemical reactions.
Developers believe these lightweight devices could eventually keep drones, satellites, and remote equipment operating without conventional battery replacements for years.
The programme falls under DARPA’s “Rads to Watts” initiative, which seeks compact energy sources delivering high energy density and longevity.
A recent $3.37 million award supports development of a proof-of-concept device producing more than 10 watts per kilogram.
One participant in the programme, Project Omega, is developing the generator that uses isotopes extracted from existing nuclear waste rather than newly produced radioactive material from dedicated facilities.
“Solar cells directly convert sunlight into electricity…Ours directly convert radiation into electricity,” said Stafford Sheehan, CEO and founder of Project Omega.
“We already have some of these small devices running; the ones that are specifically designed to meet the DARPA figure of merit are going to come out early next year.”
Researchers estimate that more than 100,000 metric tons of nuclear waste currently remain stored across 52 reactor locations nationwide.
Sheehan argued that existing stockpiles provide abundant material while unresolved disposal issues continue generating expensive legal disputes for authorities annually.
“At a high level, we take nuclear waste, we recycle it into two products: one is fuel for reactors…the other are power isotopes, so isotopes you can use to power things.”
Unlike conventional rechargeable cells, the proposed units use solid-state isotope blocks layered with semiconductors generating electricity through radiation exposure.
Radioisotope power systems have powered spacecraft and scientific missions for decades, typically using plutonium-based materials.
Project Omega will now use Strontium-90, which developers describe as less hazardous than Plutonium-238 alternatives currently employed.
The batteries are also expected to function across temperature extremes that frequently create complications for military hardware in difficult environments.
Military interest arrives as demand for unmanned systems grows alongside persistent concerns surrounding charging requirements during extended deployments worldwide.
A drone capable of operating for 30 years with continuous onboard power would alter assumptions surrounding endurance and logistics requirements.
Several organisations are participating in the Rads to Watts programme, including Morgan State University, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Northrop Grumman, ARA, and Widetronix.
Researchers expect a minimally viable prototype to emerge by early 2027 following testing under increasingly realistic operating conditions and scenarios.
However, conversion efficiency, radiation effects, reliability, and safe deployment still require extensive evaluation efforts.
If the technology succeeds, autonomous systems capable of operating for decades could become technically feasible.
Via Defense One
Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.
Ever since it entered the market in 1999, the Silverado has been the flagship truck for Chevrolet, constantly going toe-to-toe with the likes of the F-150. Priding itself on all-around practicality with plenty of comfort inside to match, the full-size Chevy has long offered one of the most versatile selections of trim levels, which is even more so the case for the newer models. Throughout the truck’s life, we’ve also had the choice between a few different engine types, which is perhaps the most crucial choice of all. Not only does it dictate how capable the truck can be, but in the Silverado’s case, some engines ring louder alarm bells than others.
Since the Silverado has been around for a while, and the newest models get plenty of praise for being reliable, but that wasn’t always the case. There are plenty of reports and data from owners to give us an idea of which engine options have the most issues, and despite the difference in construction, many fall victims to the same problems.
For the 2014 model year, Chevrolet introduced a revitalized version of the Silverado, bringing nearly every aspect of the truck up to current standards. It sported a meaner look atop the new platform, but perhaps the biggest change was under the hood, with a selection of entirely new engines available. These were the first of the Ecotec3 engines, and while some, like the 4.7L V6, don’t have as many overall issues, the same can’t be said for the mid-spec 5.3L V6 engine. Unfortunately, the problems of the 5.3L remained relevant throughout the generation, until 2018. It’s certainly worth checking any 2014-2018 model years for these issues.
On CarComplaints.com, the 2014 model year comes out ahead for being the most troublesome. Electrical issues and build quality help out with that, but the engine itself is another major pain point. Specifically, the active fuel management system that was used in this engine is well-known for causing all sorts of issues. Owners report overly excessive fuel consumption, which can subsequently cause larger failures that’ll cost a hefty amount to fix. Another problem directly related to the AFM system is the lifters failing, which comes up plenty of times on the NHTSA website. Engine failure can easily follow. As this active fuel management system was used on every one of these engines from 2014 to 2018, you may want to avoid it, unless it’s been disabled permanently.
Moving into the 2019 generation of Silverados, Chevrolet opted to keep the engines from prior models and giving them a few updates. A couple of new engines were also introduced, but looking at the reported issues for these Silverados, it’s the existing V8 that proves to be the most troublesome. In place of the AFM system found in the previous generation, a new iteration, the dynamic fuel management system, was designed to refine its performance. While it may have done so, it wasn’t issue-free. Far from it, in fact.
On top of the potential DFM issues that cause similar problems to those found in older engines, things got much worse for 6.2L-powered Silverados built between 2021 and 2024. A massive recall was put out for every Chevrolet that uses this L87 V8, not just the Silverado, due to crankshaft failures and faulty connecting rods. On the NHTSA website and CarComplaints.com, there’s no shortage of reports for this problem, often mentioning the notorious knocking leading to major engine failures if left untreated. A few specific instances also mention crank bearing issues for 6.2L Silverados built before the recall.
While the engines introduced in the 2014 generation had their fair share of issues, it was the (previous) second generation and its problems that forced to GM try to fix the active fuel management. As a result, we think you should keep clear of the 5.3L engine that was used for the Silverado between 2007 and 2013. On the flip side, the smaller 4.3L V6 doesn’t have anywhere near as many complaints as the 5.3L, nor does the larger 6.0L, despite the latter also using the AFM system.
The majority of the submitted complaints for Silverados built between 2007 and 2013 revolve around excessive oil usage. Owners also reported cam and lifter failure soon after noticing the oil levels drop dramatically, as well as issues with the spark plugs. Similar to the ’14 to ’18 model years, this is an engine you should only consider if the AFM system has been deactivated, to save yourself from potential engine failures.
![]()
Microsoft latest release of the Edge browser adds a much-requested feature for users working within Google’s web ecosystem. Edge 150 finally provides a way to sign in with a Google account, usable alongside a Microsoft account. The feature is rolling out to all Edge users on both Windows and macOS….
Read Entire Article
Source link
Bluekit phishing kit adopts browser-in-the-middle for login theft
Weekend Open Thread: High Hopes
Claude Code turned every engineer into three. Now companies need more product thinkers
Strategy authorizes up to $1.25B in Bitcoin sales under new capital plan
The House | “Reframing the debate from a binary discussion of winners and losers”: Yuan Yang reviews ‘We Are Not Machines’
MAJOR BITCOIN & MARKET UPDATE!!!! (MUST WATCH ASAP!!!)
Anonymous researcher drops 0-day ‘exploitarium’ repo
Coinbase, Circle Deepen Crypto Stock Losses Despite Resilient S&P 500
Australia treasurer says alleged access of prime minister’s bank data ’incredibly concerning’
Russian hackers now target Signal backup recovery keys
The AI boom won’t burst all at once. It will pop in ‘rolling bubbles’: Macquarie
Broncos roster: OL Ben Powers (No. 74) entering final year of contract
Presenter Caroline Flack’s brother Paul Flack dies aged 55
Silicon Valley paid to kill AI regulation, now it wants the rules back
Binance stock trading tops $1B in first month after launch
OpenAI mulls delaying IPO over valuation concerns
Alibaba-affiliate Ant Group enters the humanoid robot market with 12 deals
New exhibition reflects five decades of movement between island of Ireland and GB
How to Build INSANE Live Financial Dashboards With Claude
What a 10 Percent Drop Means for Buyers, Sellers and Renters
You must be logged in to post a comment Login