This article covers a developing story. Continue to check back with us as we will be adding more information as it becomes available.

Marvel is having quite the day in terms of Emmy nominations. After a strong recent run, including the second season of Daredevil: Born Again and animated event series Eyes of Wakanda and Marvel Zombies, the MCU is officially back in the win column thanks to Wonder Man. Series lead Yahya Abdul-Mateen II earned a nod for Outstanding Lead Actor in a Comedy Series for the superhero showbiz satire, marking Marvel Television’s first acting Emmy nomination in five years. However, that only accounted for one of 12 awards the comic giant’s shows are up for, with the other 11 going towards a title that isn’t even on Disney+.

Advertisement

In the end, the real big winner was Spider-Noir, from the trio of Sony Pictures Television, Amazon MGM Studios, and Marvel Studios. The Nicolas Cage-led superhero crime hit premiered on Prime Video to rave reviews back in May, and that’s now been reflected in the 78th Emmy Award nominations, with recognition for everything from production design and music to prosthetic makeup, cinematography, stunt performance, and more. While none of the performances received nominations, nor did the show make the cut for Outstanding Drama, the awards the show is up for recognize its greatest strength — the campy, gorgeously crafted classic noir presentation. The series now has the second-most nominations of any Marvel television title to date, behind only WandaVision‘s staggering 23 in 2021.

Created by Oren Uziel and Steve Lightfoot, Spider-Noir‘s first season introduced Ben Reilly (Cage), a familiarly black-clad superhero detective who’s a bit different from his Spider-Verse counterpart. Living in 1930s New York, he’s haunted by a personal tragedy and his own past as The Spider, the city’s only superhero. Soon, however, the drunken, down-on-his-luck private eye is pulled back into business when a new case comes across his desk that he can’t ignore, forcing him to suit up once more and stop the villains plaguing the Big Apple. He’s not alone in his fight, joined by his friend and journalist Robbie Robertson (Lamorne Morris), his ever-loyal assistant Janet Ruiz (Karen Rodriguez), and femme fatale nightclub singer Cat Hardy (Li Jun Li).

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

May 27, 2026

Network

MGM+

Advertisement

Showrunner

Oren Uziel, Steve Lightfoot

Advertisement

Directors

Harry Bradbeer

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

This article covers a developing story. Continue to check back with us as we will be adding more information as it becomes available.

By Chris Snellgrove
| Published 15 seconds ago

Right now, X-Men ‘97 Season 2 is absolutely killing it, maintaining the almost impossibly high standard created by Season 1. Understandably, fans are wondering exactly how much of this awesome animated revival we are going to get. The exact answer to that question is something of a moving target. Previously, executive producer Larry Houston said that Marvel Animation is currently working on Seasons 3 and 4 and that the goal is to hit at least five seasons, which would match the original X-Men: The Animated Series. While that’s already an ambitious goal, one power player at Marvel is dreaming even bigger.

In a recent interview with POC Culture, Houston confirmed that Brad Winderbaum, the Head of Streaming, Television and Animation at Marvel Studios, would love to do 10 seasons. Unsurprisingly, the writers, producers, and voice actors support this goal, as that means we’d be getting more of this hit series for the better part of a decade. However, there’s one potential downside that none of the movers and shakers at Marvel have considered. If X-Men ‘97 can maintain this same level of quality for 10 seasons, it may effectively kill the MCU by forcing fans to ask the obvious question about live-action Marvel movies: “why can’t they be as good as the cartoon?”

Comparison Is The Thief Of Joy

It’s an open secret that, after Avengers: Endgame, Marvel really fell off, both creatively and commercially. Once, this franchise regularly pumped out billion-dollar movies; however, that became a rarity (last year, neither The Thunderbolts nor The Fantastic Four: First Steps came anywhere close). Major warning bells began to sound when The Marvels, a direct sequel to one of those billion-dollar films, actually lost the studio money. Because of this, MCU guru Kevin Feige created a daring strategy. With Avengers: Doomsday and the return of Chris Evans and Robert Downey Jr., he hopes to channel Endgame. And with Avengers: Secret Wars, he’d reboot the entire Marvel Cinematic Universe. 

That reboot will allow for recasting popular characters like Captain America and Iron Man while adding some major players (like the X-Men) to the MCU. Because the mutants are headed to the big screen, you might think that X-Men ‘97 lasting for a decade would be a good thing because it creates synergy across multiple platforms and media. However, this cartoon knocking it out of the park year after year could be a problem because it naturally invites fan comparisons to the MCU. No matter how good the X-Men movie is, its two hours will be compared to entire seasons of X-Men ‘97. If the movie is bad, fans may cry for yet another cinematic reboot. 

It’s Not Just In Our Heads

The decline of the MCU had already happened long before the premiere of X-Men ‘97 Season 1. Media outlets began tossing around the term “superhero fatigue” to pretend this decline was out of Marvel’s control and that millions of people suddenly lost their appetite for tights-and-flights movies overnight. In reality, these movies stopped making as much money because so many of them weren’t as good as earlier films. All it took was a handful of lukewarm Marvel movies to nearly destroy the franchise because all of us remembered how, not that many years ago (there were only four years between Endgame and The Marvels!), the studio knew how to make good films. 

Now, maybe Kevin Feige’s dream comes true and both Avengers: Doomsday and Avengers: Secret Wars provide Endgame-level quality and revive major public interest in the franchise. But what happens if the subsequent movies suffer a major dip in quality like so many of the post-Endgame movies? We’ll just be in for “superhero fatigue” 2.0, which will be accelerated because X-Men ‘97 will constantly remind us how good these films could be. It was bad enough when we were simply comparing new, mediocre movies to excellent ones from the past. How much worse will future flops be when we know Marvel has killer writers and they are simply working on another project?

When You’re Destined To Die

Obviously, this isn’t to blame X-Men ‘97; the show is perfect, and if we get eight more seasons after this, this ‘80s kid’s heart will fill with joy. But as far back as Season 1, fans were comparing this show to the live-action films and actively questioning why Marvel could create a consistently awesome series but kept dropping the ball with feature films. If the MCU experiences a similar post-Secret Wars decline in film quality while X-Men ‘97 keeps knocking it out of the park, the box office for these movies will shrivel up and die. Why spend a small fortune to see a mediocre movie when better superhero stories are streaming on demand?

In the end, the perfect cartoon might kill the most ambitious cinematic franchise ever created. Should the MCU die, though, they could always take their cue from X-Men ‘97: just wait nearly three decades and pick up right where they left off!

With just days to go before its theatrical release, the review embargo for Evil Dead Burn has officially lifted and while not every critic is completely sold, the latest chapter in the legendary horror franchise is already earning praise for delivering exactly what longtime fans have been craving: relentless gore, inventive kills, and an unapologetically brutal return to Deadite terror.

Directed by Sébastien Vaniček, the filmmaker behind the acclaimed horror thriller Infested, Evil Dead Burn follows a grieving widow who seeks comfort with her late husband’s family, only to find herself trapped in a nightmare as demonic forces begin possessing those around her. The film stars Souheila Yacoub, Hunter Doohan, Luciane Buchanan, and Tandi Wright, while franchise creators Sam Raimi and Robert Tapert return as producers.

Many of the first reviews have praised Vaniček’s fresh vision for the franchise, with critics highlighting the film’s intense practical effects, creative set pieces, and emotionally grounded story. Several reviewers have even suggested Evil Dead Burn may be the most violent installment the series has ever produced.

Evil Dead Burn [credit: Warner Bros.]

Advertisement

Not every review has been glowing, however. While some critics applauded the film’s willingness to push the boundaries of horror, others argued that its relentless brutality occasionally comes at the expense of the dark humor and charm that helped define earlier entries in the franchise.

One of the film’s stars, Hunter Doohan, recently spoke about the demanding production, revealing that some of the movie’s elaborate action and horror sequences required days of filming and extensive rehearsals.

“How the f— are we going to do this?”

Doohan recalled thinking while preparing for one of the film’s most ambitious set pieces.

Doohan also revealed that he watched every previous Evil Dead film before production began to fully immerse himself in the franchise’s mythology, saying the experience turned him into an even bigger fan.

Ahead of production, Vaniček also shared that Bruce Campbell had one major request for the new installment: respect what made Evil Dead special while still bringing something new to the table. According to the director, Campbell encouraged him to stay true to the franchise’s DNA without simply recreating what had come before.

Whether Evil Dead Burn ultimately ranks among the franchise’s very best remains to be seen, but the early consensus suggests horror fans are in for one of the year’s most intense theatrical experiences. With praise for its practical effects, gruesome kills, and uncompromising vision, the latest chapter appears ready to continue the franchise’s reputation as one of horror’s bloodiest and most enduring series when it opens in theaters on July 10.

Last year, few movies proved as controversial as the live-action Snow White remake, with Disney facing backlash from seemingly all corners of social media. Although some of the negativity was unfair, such as conservative backlash at Rachel Zegler‘s casting, the majority was from honest critique, not just of the movie itself, but of Disney’s current obsession with remaking many of their beloved animated IPs in live-action form.

No wonder then that the announcement of a live-action Moana movie, released just ten years after the original, raised eyebrows higher than Dwayne Johnson‘s. The first Moana movie scored a global box office haul of nearly $700 million, with the $1 billion success of the 2024 sequel proving that audiences haven’t had enough of the titular daughter of the village chief just yet. Recently, Johnson confirmed that the animated story would be continuing, with Moana 3 officially in development, with Jared Bush and Dana Ledoux Miller lined up to write the script. “But first, live-action Moana. We’ll let that come out first,” Johnson said, although after the embargo was lifted today, he might be regretting not already putting all his attention into the threequel.

Receiving a similar scathing reaction to Snow White, Moana has earned a disastrous Rotten Tomatoes score of 33%, an average based on 49 submissions to the site thus far. This is almost three-times worse than the near-perfect 95% rating of the 2016 original, and indicates some choppy waters ahead for the film. ScreenRant claimed that the remake “loses some of the original’s magic,” with CBR reacting more positively, though admitting, “even though it is thrilling, there are still elements that are a bit of a head scratcher.”

What Did Collider Say About ‘Moana’?

So, what did Collider say about the live-action Moana ​​​​​​remake? Our very own Taylor Gates joined the rest of the critical world in her review, awarding just 5/10 and criticizing bland visuals, a strangely constrained Johnson performance, and “sluggish” pacing. “Despite a few fun, solidly executed musical sequences and a nice tribute to Polynesian culture, Moana ultimately fails to capture the magic of its animated counterpart,” Gates wrote, before concluding, “Everything it does well, the 2016 version already did better.” The live-action Moana movie debuts in theaters worldwide this weekend and is projected to open to over $130 million worldwide.

For all the latest movie news from the biggest blockbusters, make sure to stay tuned to Collider.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

July 10, 2026

Runtime

120 Minutes

Advertisement

Director

Thomas Kail

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

By Chris Snellgrove
| Published 26 seconds ago

One of the reasons that Star Trek: The Original Series became a breakout sci-fi hit was because of its stellar cast. Who else could make an alien charismatic like Leonard Nimoy, or so perfectly embody the fiery passion of humanity like DeForest Kelly? Of course, the real lynchpin of the show was William Shatner, who instantly transformed Captain Kirk into the most compelling pop culture icon of the 20th century. For decades, it seemed like it would be impossible to replace Shatner, but that didn’t keep Paramount from trying. Chris Pine played this famous captain in Star Trek (2009) and its two sequels, while Paul Wesley currently plays Kirk on Strange New Worlds.

In the Kelvinverse films, Pine’s performance was basically a high-energy imitation of Shatner’s, which was a lot of fun. To Wesley’s credit, he has leaned more into his particular strengths as an actor, giving us a Kirk who is notably more thoughtful and nuanced. By now, Strange New Worlds fans are quite happy with his performance, and most can’t imagine anyone else playing this iconic sci-fi figure. However, one fellow performer might not be so happy. Originally, Sam Kirk actor Dan Jeannotte thought he’d be playing James Kirk. Why is that? In the original show, Sam Kirk was played by William Shatner wearing a fake mustache!

The Other Kirk

When Dan Jeannotte first shows up in Strange New Worlds, it serves as a kind of visual punchline. When we hear reference to a “Mr. Kirk,” audiences naturally expect to see Star Trek legend James T. Kirk. Instead, we discover that it’s his brother, Sam, who is currently stationed on the Enterprise. While this made for a fun tease early in Season 1, and Sam has proven to be a great character in his own right, it didn’t take the writers long to actually bring James Kirk to the show. When this happened, Jeannotte thought that he was going to be the one to play this legendary future captain.

He admitted this recently at a Trek Long Island panel. “They were like, later in the season, Jim Kirk shows up, I’m like, yeah, here we go! And then they’re like… Paul Wesley!” Why, though, did Jeannotte think he had a shot at playing a completely different character? It all goes back to Sam Kirk’s one and only appearance in Star Trek: The Original Series: “Operation, Annihilate!” In this Season 1 finale, he is already dead when the Away Team finds him. Since he was written to be an older brother with no speaking lines, the show saved money by having William Shatner (complete with bad makeup and mustache) play the role.

The Man, The Myth, The Mustache

Therefore, Dan Jeannotte’s confusion is a bit more understandable. Canonically, the George Kirk of TOS looked enough like his younger brother to be played by the same actor, so it’s not that crazy to think the James Kirk of SNW would just look like Sam without the mustache. However, Paramount wisely decided that this would be way too silly for their prestige sci-fi show and cast Wesley in that role instead. Jeannotte ultimately took the casting in stride, telling the Trek Long Island audience that “Paul has a lot to live up to…and a lot of expectations to manage.” As for himself? “All I had to do was be better than a corpse.”

Still, I kind of want to visit the alternate timeline where Jeannotte played both Kirks, ideally with a Henry Cavill-style mustache CGI’ed on Sam. How wonderfully silly would that make all of their interactions? Speaking of mustaches, here’s a fun fact: Leonard Nimoy protested a Season 1 plot point about someone putting a mustache on Spock because he wanted to protect that character’s dignity. At the end of that same season, Shatner didn’t hesitate to wear a fake mustache to play a non-James Kirk role for the first and last time. Why did he do that?

Simple: anything to get more screen time, baby!

Alicia Brown‘s mugshot has been released as Durrell Williams, the father of her missing daughter, Ailea Brown, has spoken out following her arrest on outstanding kidnapping-related warrants.

RELATED: Social Media Users Point Fingers Following Leaked Video Of Big Tigger & Alicia Brown’s Physical Struggle Over His Phone (UPDATE)

Father Of Alicia Brown’s Missing Daughter Speaks Out Following Her Arrest On Outstanding Kidnapping-Related Warrants

On the evening of Tuesday, July 7, Durrell Williams appeared as a guest on the Nina & Joe Afternoon Show broadcast via WHUR FM. In a clip shared via the show’s Instagram page, the hosts questioned Williams about how he learned about Alicia’s arrest. Williams explained that he received a call informing him that she was in custody. This, in connection with the 2019 disappearance of their daughter, Ailea.

Furthermore, Williams explained that their daughter was not one of the two children found in the car during Alicia’s arrest.

“So they haven’t located Ailea yet. They’re still searching… She’s alive. She’s definitely alive, I can confirm that,” Williams told the hosts. “I’ve always known that. I’ve always known pretty much what was going on. To be honest with you, I hate it had to be who they have in custody because that’s still her mom, and all of this was for nothing. All of this was for nothing.”

Nonetheless, Williams explained that he would like his daughter to understand that it was not right for her to be taken away.

“This is not okay. This is actually against the law. So in time, I hope you can understand that this is the truth and I still miss you. I can’t wait to see you and I just hope you understand everything that might be going on because I know it’s alot and I’m sorry that your name is circling around so much for this instead of things that you’re actually good at and talented at.

Williams noted that he hopes he and his now 17-year-old daughter can “start on a good foot” and he’ll be waiting for her when she’s ready.

Social Media Weighs In On Statements From Father Of Brown’s Missing Daughter

Social media users weighed in on the statements from the father of Alicia Brown’s missing daughter in the comment section of the post.

Alicia Brown’s Mugshot Released & More On Her Arrest On Kidnapping-Related Warrants

As The Shade Room previously reported, Alicia Brown initially made headlines in June. At the time, she took to social media to seemingly accuse Big Tigger of physical assault and infidelity.

Their situation has since escalated with Tigger’s co-host denying the cheating allegations, Tigger being named a suspect in an assault investigation, him being arrested in that investigation, and multiple clips surfacing of his apparent physical interactions with Alicia Brown.

Additionally, the ordeal has also uncovered allegations about Alicia’s past, and the 2019 disappearance of her then-10-year-old daughter.

On Monday, July 6, Alicia was arrested on multiple outstanding kidnapping-related warrants, per The Shade Room. It is believed that she will be extradited to Maryland. Per WSB-TV, the investigation into her case remains ongoing. This, as authorities reportedly believe she is aware of her daughter’s whereabouts.

See Alicia Brown’s mugshot below.

RELATED: Big Tigger’s Wife Reportedly Arrested On Outstanding Kidnapping-Related Warrants Connected To 2019 Disappearance Of Her Daughter

Bleachers singer Jack Antonoff was among the celebrities to attend Taylor Swift‘s wedding to Travis Kelce at Madison Square Garden. However, his wife, Margaret Qualley, was noticeably absent from the spectacle. Now, days later, sources say the couple has split after three years of marriage. This comes after the actress wiped photos of the frequent Swift collaborator from her Instagram page.

On July 8, Qualley and Antonoff split after tying the knot in August 2023. It’s unclear why the breakup happened, but a source told PEOPLE magazine that their relationship had been “rocky.” However, another insider stated that the actress and the musician are “figuring things out.”

Qualley and Antonoff were first linked in August 2021 after they were seen kissing. They then made their first public appearance in 2022, attending the AFI Awards Luncheon. The couple went Instagram official the same month.

From there, Antonoff and Qualley became engaged in May 2022 and married the following month in New Jersey. Notably, Swift attended the wedding, as did Channing Tatum,  Zoë Kravitz, Cara Delevingne, and Lana Del Rey.

Margaret Qualley Recently Deleted Wedding Photos

The first sign of trouble in Antonoff’s marriage to Qualley came when she skipped Swift’s wedding to Kelce. However, more recently, their wedding photos were deleted from her Instagram page. It’s worth noting that, according to The Daily Mail, she’d posted photos from the wedding in March to promote his new single with Bleachers.

In fact, there are no photos of the musician at present, despite there being several before.

Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s lavish wedding was filled with unforgettable moments, but one subtle detail may have lasting significance long after the celebration ended. 

The couple’s intertwined “T&T” logo was impossible to miss throughout their Madison Square Garden nuptials, leading many fans to see it as nothing more than a romantic wedding monogram. 

Branding experts, however, believe the carefully designed emblem could represent the foundation of an enduring public identity, with some suggesting it may eventually become one of the couple’s most recognizable symbols.

From the moment guests received their invitations, it became clear that Taylor Swift and Kelce had carefully crafted a visual identity for their big day.

Their custom “T&T” monogram, two connected “T” initials linked by delicate hearts, appeared throughout nearly every aspect of the celebration. 

Advertisement

The design featured prominently on wedding invitations before making its way onto luxury gift boxes distributed during the rehearsal dinner.

Inside Madison Square Garden, the branding continued to appear on podiums, decorative displays, and even commemorative handkerchiefs gifted to guests.

Rather than functioning as a simple decorative element, the emblem tied the entire event together, creating a consistent visual theme that reflected the couple’s new chapter together.

Swift’s Wedding Branding Mirrors What Celebrity Couples Are Doing

4

For celebrity event planner JoAnn Gregoli, the logo is part of a growing trend among high-profile weddings.

Gregoli, whose clients have included George and Amal Clooney, Jon Bon Jovi, and Bill Clinton, explained that custom branding has become an increasingly important part of modern celebrity celebrations.

Advertisement

“Most weddings want to feel very personal, so often we will come up with a branding logo monogram to make it feel like it’s the couple, and then we use that branding throughout the process,” she told the Daily Mail.

She explained that couples typically review several design concepts before settling on one that best represents them. In many cases, that logo continues to play a role long after the wedding itself.

One former client even chose to display their wedding logo on a private jet after getting married.

According to Gregoli, “If they love the logo that much, and it really represents their brand as a couple, they will take that logo and trademark it and use it throughout their lifetime.”

Advertisement

Although no public trademark filings currently indicate Taylor Swift and Kelce have protected the design, experts believe the possibility remains very real.

Taylor Swift’s Trademark History Has Sparked New Questions

4

Given Swift’s well-documented history of protecting her intellectual property, some fans have already begun wondering whether the wedding logo could eventually join her extensive trademark portfolio.

The singer reportedly owns more than 150 trademarks, covering everything from her cats’ names to memorable lyrics including “Welcome to New York, it’s been waiting for you.”

Lisa Delpy Neirotti, director of the sports management program at George Washington University’s School of Business, believes trademark protection would help the couple maintain control over the design, particularly since unofficial versions have already begun appearing online.

“There are already counterfeiters out there doing it: I’ve seen people trying to sell it on Etsy and things like that,” she said.

Advertisement

Still, Neirotti believes the logo’s greatest value lies in storytelling rather than merchandising.

She revealed, “They’re probably going to try to trademark it. I could see it appearing on the cover of an album. Maybe she’s working on something about their marriage or that chapter of her life. I would see it integrated into her work rather than just used to sell T-shirts.”

Swift And Kelce May Need To Strike The Right Balance

4

Branding specialists also believe the newlyweds will need to carefully navigate how closely they merge their public identities moving forward.

Before their wedding, Swift and Kelce had already offered subtle hints of coordinated branding by wearing Ralph Lauren for their engagement photos before selecting Christian Dior for their wedding day.

Bob Dorfman, author of the annual Sports Marketers’ Scouting Report, believes those thoughtful decisions worked because they felt natural rather than overly commercial.

Advertisement

“Cynical people are assuming this is just a business deal, so you have to be careful that you’re not branding people to death,” he said, adding, “They have to let their individual careers continue along their paths without making everything T&T together.”

Neirotti echoed that sentiment, arguing the logo is unlikely to become another merchandising opportunity.

“This is one of the most important moments of her life. She did everything so high-end and so thoughtfully that I don’t see her trying to license or commercialize it. But I do see it being integrated into her future work,” she said.

Travis Kelce Reflects On Taylor Swift Proposal In First Podcast Since Wedding

4

While insiders continue dissecting every detail of Swift and Kelce’s wedding, from its signature logo to its lasting symbolism, the newlyweds are beginning to share a few heartfelt memories of their journey to the altar. 

During the first episode of the “New Heights” podcast since their July 3 wedding, Kelce reflected on the proposal that started it all, revealing he had been planning the surprise while filming an episode with Swift in August 2025. 

Advertisement

The Kansas City Chiefs star admitted he had to keep his excitement under wraps as preparations unfolded behind the scenes before transforming his backyard into a romantic garden setting where he popped the question. 

Looking back, Kelce described the proposal as a moment he will “remember forever,” while recalling how special it was to finally ask Swift to marry him after months of careful planning.