On Tuesday, one day after his arrival in his home country, Harry made his way to Central London for an Invictus Games Foundation event at Chatham House. The event brought together members of the Invictus community, leading experts and policymakers, including UK minister for veterans and people Calvin Bailey, to discuss issues affecting wounded, injured and sick service personnel and veterans – all those eligible to take part in the paralympic-style games.

Inside the event, chair of the Invictus Games Foundation Lord Charles Allen, CBE, introduced Harry to the stage just moments after the verdict was delivered, as he thanked the audience for coming before joking that “this is one of the few rooms in the UK that has air conditioning!”

Harry said during his address: “Looking around this room, I see people representing different nations, different governments, different militaries, different organisations and different approaches to recovery. And that’s exactly as it should be.

“No two countries are the same. No two healthcare systems are the same. No two military cultures are the same. What brings us together is far more important than what sets us apart.

“Every one of us believes that those who have served their country – and in particular those whose lives have been changed by that service – deserve more than our gratitude. They deserve opportunity. The chance to redefine one’s Purpose and Identity. They deserve to truly feel our admiration and Respect. And they deserve every chance to build the life they choose beyond military service. That’s what the Invictus Community is all about.”

Harry concluded: “I hope you leave this conference with a deeper understanding of what the Invictus movement really is. Not simply a week of sport every few years, but a community united by one belief: that the unconquered human spirit exists in every nation and that our shared responsibility is to create the conditions in which it can flourish.”

A family is suing a daycare worker after their toddler sustained a brain injury from being dropped on the floor.

The 23-month-old tot was being looked after at membership-based fitness and hospitality centre, The Bay Club, in El Segundo, California.

He can be seen on CCTV footage approaching a member of staff, indicating he would like to be picked up, which she obliged and swung him into the air.

She then appeared to let go of his hands but failed to catch the child, named C.K. The pair tumbled to the floor, with the worker landing on top of him.

After moving to the side, she quickly comforts the little boy, who can be seen crying on the video as another staff member approaches them.

The family claim their son has been left with a severe brain injury and also accused the daycare of lying about the circumstances in which he was hurt.

‘The deception by the Bay Club of hiding this horrific incident from the parents is inexcusable,’ said the family’s attorney, Ryan Saba of Rosen Saba.

He continued: ‘The daycare facility should have the highest amount of care for the children, and if a child gets sick or injured, they should notify the parents with transparency and urgency.’

The toddler’s dad, Matthew Kittle, dropped him off at the centre around 8:30am on March 17, 2025, with the complaint alleging he planned to return two hours later.

In the complaint, where the Kittles are seeking an undisclosed amount for damages, they allege C.K. fell from an estimated height of 6ft.

Kittle was called to inform him of the fall, but claims he was told it was a normal fall and his son did not need to be collected early.

By 9.45am, they reportedly called him again and said C.K. needed to be picked up as he could not settle.

The lawsuit states: ‘The Bay Club gave Mr. Kittle the impression that C.K. only sustained a minor injury and that it was C.K. who was causing stress on the staff, which required a parent to retrieve the child.’

On arrival, Kittle saw the injuries were worse than reported but was apparently told the employee fell over while in a ‘squatting position’, so C.K. wasn’t far from the floor.

The toddler’s eye was allegedly swollen shut, with bruising on the right side of his face and swelling around his mouth. He was also said to be drowsy and irritable.

The lawsuit alleges a staff member told Kittle his son ‘wanted to go to sleep immediately after the fall and that the Bay Club’s employees had trouble keeping him awake.’

The family claims a doctor then diagnosed C.K. with concussion,  blunt head trauma and facial abrasion.

The Bay Club has said it is unable to comment on ongoing litigation.

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.

For more stories like this, check our news page.

MORE: Heatwaves shut my kids’ school – we need to learn to cope

MORE: Mums are swapping baby sensory for baby wine tasting — I didn’t need telling twice

MORE: Kate Lawler: People accuse me of selfishness for only having one child

The property, located at 140 Atherton Road, Hindley, will be transformed into two two-bedroom flats and one three-bedroom flat.

Proposals submitted by Mr. Matt Mitchell aimed to utilise the unused two-storey corner-plot building at the junction of Atherton Road and Wenlock Street.

Standing currently empty, the building was previously granted approval for conversion into two flats on the first floor in 2020.

Then, in 2025, plans to turn the vacant building into four apartments were granted.

However, new plans were put forward for the whole property to become three multi-storey flats—each unit to spread across both ground and first floor.

The development promises a substantially renovated exterior, with the existing shopfront to be replaced with residential windows and doors.

New windows and doors at both ground and first floor levels are also part of the proposal.

Plans also include the transformation of the rear yard into a bin and cycle store, together with a small communal area for residents.

The building was previously in Class E use as a fresh fruit and vegetable shop.

The agent handling the application was Bill Schafer of Schafer Associates.

The Housing Enabling Team at Wigan Council responded positively to the proposal, noting that there is a growing demand for residential development within town centres.

While the plans do not reach the threshold that requires affordable housing provision, they offer a mix of housing types, conforming with the local policy directive.

The meeting national space standards, the flats are planned as 70.2sqm and 70.6sqm for the two-bedroom units, while the three-bedroom flat will be 94.9sqm.

The change of use is expected to reduce the number of vehicle movements compared to its current permitted Class E uses.

The Transport Policy Officers had no objections to the change of use considering the site stands in a highly sustainable location close to the town centre.

Despite the lack of designated in-curtilage parking, on-street options are believed to cover all requirements.

For more notices affecting YOUR area, visit our Public Notice Portal: https://publicnoticeportal.uk/leigh-journal

It’s been over six months since Pluribus came out, and it’s still living rent-free in my mind. So why isn’t it for everybody else?

When the post-apocalyptic Apple TV Plus show from Breaking Bad creator Vince Gilligan first landed, it seemed to make a sizeable splash.

Bells clanged for the streaming network’s ‘most watched show’ in its history (360 million minutes viewed post-finale), beating the streamer’s megahit Severance to the top spot (even if this is still comparatively lower than other streaming service numbers).

That’s not its only accolade. It boasts a 99% Rotten Tomatoes critics’ score based on a whopping 184 reviews, and lead star Rhea Seehorn has deservedly scooped up a Golden Globe and Critics Choice award.

Now the star, 54, is celebrating an Emmy nomination alongside a total of 18 for the dystopian series where her moody and cynical character, Carol, is left unmoored when the rest of the world is swept up by a virus which makes them all perpetually happy.

You may think that, given all the show has going for it, I wouldn’t be able to move for praise for the actress, discourse about the show and recommendations from friends.

After all, this is what has happened to other major Apple hits like Severance, which burst into the mainstream with a bang, so even people who hadn’t seen the series could recognise Britt Lower as Helly from a mile away. Britt notably went on to win the Emmy that Rhea is now up for.

Seriously, I must have watched that scene of Adam Scott running through the corridors in Severance’s season two opener more times than I’ve seen my parents this year.

The show remains a staple of TV-loving conversation and, when the series finale took place, there was endless chatter about theories, love triangles and the existential doom it posed.

All of this buzz was well-deserved, and it’s firmly earned its place in the zeitgeist. So, with similar levels of acclaim, I can’t understand why Pluribus hasn’t made the same leap.

Especially when it comes to lead star Rhea, who delivers one of the best performances on TV this year. Yet when I mention the show to friends and family, I normally encounter the glazed-over look of someone who has no idea what I’m talking about.

Best case, I hear an apathetic: ‘Oh yeah, I’ve heard of that show, not watched it’.

Even comparing it to the kind of cultural capital Breaking Bad has accrued, it’s crickets.

As for other major Emmy nominees this year, I’ve heard far more about The Pitt, stars like Matthew Rhys for his performance in The Beast in Me, Euphoria and its star-studded cast and viral shows like Ryan Murphy’s Love Story than I have about Pluribus. It’s not even a competition.

It’s clear Pluribus hasn’t been everyone’s cup of tea, plateauing at a 68% Rotten Tomatoes audience score, with the most common complaint accusing it of being ‘boring’ and too much of a ‘slow burn’ to get into.

I agree that the show does have a slower pace and takes its time building this new world Carol is plunged into, but I would argue that for those who stick with it, this makes it all the better.

As a character, Carol is far more than a grumpy writer who loathes her fanbase. She’d known love, desire and had found her slice of happiness before it was cruelly snatched away from her.

She is desperately human in all the worst ways and, unlike the hardy heroes of many other post-apocalyptic dramas, succumbs to her weaknesses.

Yes, Carol is utterly unlikeable, especially at the beginning, but that’s what makes the actor’s endearing portrayal all the more impressive.

Rhea does a masterful job of portraying the grief Carol goes through, both for humanity and for her own life, as well as her genuine panic at ‘well, what the hell do I do now?’

Not to mention the utterly compelling dynamic between Carol and the virus-infected Zosia (played by fellow Emmy-nominated Karolina Wydra), whose will-they-won’t-they romance raises a whole host of moral conundrums.

Yet, aside from a handful of fellow fans, I’ve been bereft of the juicy, widespread debates about the twists and turns of the plot, Rhea’s award-winning turn, and everyone’s theories about season two.

Instead, I’ve been surviving on fan edits on TikTok and the occasional viral tweet that might spark some chatter. This is a call to all those Apple TV viewers to come out of your shell. Don’t be shy!

I can only hope more people switch on before the second season arrives and Rhea has to win the Emmy to make it so, then so be it!

Pluribus is available to stream on Apple TV Plus now.

MORE: Amazon Prime fans are raging over Emmys snub for ‘greatest TV villain of all time’

MORE: Timothée Chalamet reveals he ‘lost a part of me’ while filming Dune: Part Three

MORE: Trying is one of TV’s most heartwarming shows after season 5 comeback

Britain is facing the threat of fuel shortages this winter without the approval of the Jackdaw gas field in the North Sea, Labour has been warned.

Neil McCulloch, the boss of Adura – the company behind Jackdaw, said it was ‘hyper critical’ that the field 150 miles east of Aberdeen is given the go-ahead.

He said the UK had limited options in the event of a ‘gas supply emergency’ as he piled pressure on Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, to grant approval.

As part of his Net Zero agenda, Mr Miliband has banned new oil and gas exploration off Britain’s coastline.

But Andy Burnham, who is almost certain to replace Keir Starmer as prime minister on 20 July, has said he is ‘open-minded’ about ramping up drilling in the North Sea.

Mr McCulloch’s warning comes amid growing calls – including from Labour MPs and the party’s trade union backers – for Mr Miliband to soften his stance on fossil fuels.

Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said Mr Burnham faced a ‘choice’ when he becomes PM of either pushing for cheaper energy or allowing ‘Net Zero madness’ to ‘hold our country back’.

Industry regulator, the North Sea Transition Authority, is currently considering a revised application for Jackdaw, as well as the Rosebank field off Shetland.

As part of his Net Zero agenda, Energy Secretary Ed Miliband has banned new oil and gas exploration off Britain’s coastline

Initial approval of both sites – which was given by the previous Tory government – was later withdrawn when a court ruled consent was granted unlawfully following a case brought by environmental campaigners.

This forced the owners to seek fresh permission to extract oil and gas from the fields, with a final decision set to fall to the Energy Secretary if the NSTA gives its approval.

Mr Miliband, who has been touted as Mr Burnham’s potential Chancellor, has repeatedly insisted that ramping up North Sea oil and gas production ‘won’t take a penny off’ domestic energy bills because fossil fuels are traded on international markets.

But Mr Miliband, who is bidding to decarbonise the UK’s electricity by 2030, is under increasing pressure to alter his position due to the impact of the Iran war on global energy prices.

Adura – a joint venture between Shell and Equinor – has been required to update its environmental impact assessment for Jackdaw, which was released on Wednesday as a public consultation was also launched.

Speaking to the BBC from the Jackdaw field, Mr McCulloch said the project was in its final stages and could meet 6 per cent of the UK’s gas needs from 1 October if given approval.

‘If I were the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, I’d be looking closely at where’s my next source of energy security, and you’re standing on it’, he said.

‘The wells are drilled, they’re hooked up. We’re just readying the systems. It will be ready for 1 October. Jackdaw will play a vital part of this winter’s gas supply.’

Mrs Badenoch said that opening Jackdaw was ‘common sense’, adding: ‘Britain needs cheap, abundant and reliable energy if we are going to grow.

‘Jackdaw alone could supply around 6 per cent of our gas needs this October.

‘Andy Burnham has a choice. Back British energy, British jobs and lower bills or let Labour’s Net Zero madness hold our country back.’

Whitehall sources dismissed claims that Britain faced the threat of fuel shortages this winter without the approval of the Jackdaw field.

They pointed to how the National Energy System Operator (NESO) said in a recent report that it expects to meet demand this winter.

‘Our current view is that the electricity system will remain secure and reliable through winter 2026/27,’ NESO said in its ‘Winter Watch’.

‘We expect a surplus of 5.5GW between 31 October 2026 and 31 March 2027, with an 8.8 per cent buffer over expected peak demand. 

‘The outlook is positive, but winter conditions can change. NESO will continue to monitor global gas markets, European electricity flows, weather conditions and periods where supply and demand may be more finely balanced, particularly in January.’

Neil Johnston, BBC Sport journalist

It’s going to require something extra special to stop this Les Bleus juggernaut from reaching a third straight World Cup final.

France have overcome a two-hour storm delay in Philadelphia, the loss of Deschamps for one match (he returned home for the funeral of his mother) and Paraguay’s ‘dark arts’ to reach the last eight.

They have been an absolute joy to watch, particularly against Sweden in the last 32 when they registered 25 attempts. The fear for their rivals is they still have another couple of gears we have not yet seen at this World Cup.

It’s not just Mbappe, Olise and Dembele – who have 20 goal involvements between them. Les Bleus have yet to fall behind.

They have conceded just twice in five games – when they were leading Senegal 3-0 and when they were 2-0 up against Norway, with Arsenal’s William Saliba and Olise’s Bayern Munich team-mate Dayot Upamecano marshalling the defence.

Who can stop France? They will meet Spain or Belgium in the semi-final if they get past Morocco. Spain, who have yet to concede, will be a huge test.

Les Bleus were frustrated by Paraguay before finding a way to win – and I suspect Deschamps’ side will have too much firepower for Spain, while their strength in depth from the bench is eye-watering.

He’s the smallest man left in the Wimbledon singles draw – as well as the youngest.

But far from holding him back, experts say Arthur Fery’s youth, shorter stature and relative Grand Slam inexperience could actually give the British wildcard an unlikely edge.

Scientists say the 23–year–old may have several hidden advantages over his more established rivals, including faster footwork and sharper changes of direction.

He came into the tournament ranked 114th in the world, having never progressed past the second round of a major before.

Now, he has become the first wildcard to reach a Wimbledon semi–final in 25 years.

He will need to utilise every advantage he can when he faces world number two Alexander Zverev in the semi–final tomorrow.

At 6ft 6in (1.98m), the German stands nine inches taller than Fery, who measures just 5ft 9in (1.75m).

However Adam Taylor, Professor of Anatomy at Lancaster University, told the Daily Mail: ‘Being shorter as a tennis player has a few advantages.’

British wildcard Arthur Fery (left), who measures just 5ft 11in, is the smallest man left in the Wimbledon singles draw

Professor Taylor explained that the continued change in direction required for the rallies in tennis can benefit players who are shorter.

‘Their lower centre of gravity means they are more agile and less likely to fall over,’ he said.

‘This gives them an advantage when moving around the court.’

He explained that shorter limbs can also be beneficial as the initial power generated is greater than in longer arms or legs.

‘This is key when changing direction or commencing movement to get to a return,’ he said.

‘Although taller players might be faster overall, the size of the tennis court means that there isn’t sufficient space for tall players to achieve their top speed which is generally faster.’

At just 23, Fery is six years younger than his 29–year–old opponent Zverev.

This could also work in his favour, the expert said.

Shorter limbs can also be beneficial as the initial power generated is greater than in longer arms or legs. Pictured: Fery plays a backhand against Flavio Cobolli of Italy

Advertisement

Being a British tennis player at Wimbledon means the crowd will be behind you, triggering a huge release of endorphins which can have a positive impact on heart, lung and muscle performance

‘At an elite level the advantage would be less than for the average person,’ Professor Taylor said.

‘However, the recovery time for younger players is generally shorter and at an elite level younger players have typically accumulated less injuries and niggles which can have an impact on performance.’

He explained that individuals over the age of 30 have a lower VO2 max – the amount of oxygen your body can absorb during exercise – compared to younger people.

‘It peaks at around age 30 and declines after that,’ he added.

While this may not have an impact on the Zverev game, if Fery goes through to the final it could give him an edge against 39–year–old Novak Djokovic, who he could be up against.

Professor Taylor explained that being a wildcard entrant – rather than a favourite to win – could ease the pressure on Fery’s shoulders compared to higher–ranked players.

‘The expectations of the big names comes with pressure, which can sometime impact performance,’ he said.

‘One of the other advantages is as someone with limited grand slam experience is that opponents have less exposure to how you play.’

Arthur Fery celebrates his Wimbledon quarter–final victory against Italy’s Flavio Cobolli. Tomorrow he will play world number two Alexander Zverev

Finally, he said there is one key element with ‘huge potential’ for impacting performance – the crowd.

‘Being a British tennis player at Wimbledon with the crowd behind you will create a huge endorphin release in the body,’ he said.

‘This is the feel–good factor.

‘These endorphins can have a huge impact on how your heart, lungs and muscles perform.’

Michelle Spear, Professor of Anatomy at the University of Bristol, agreed with Professor Taylor’s analysis.

‘Height in tennis is often discussed as though taller is always better, but it is more nuanced than that,’ she told the Daily Mail.

‘A taller player may have an obvious mechanical advantage on serve… but being shorter can bring its own advantages, particularly in movement, balance and return of serve.

‘A lower centre of gravity can make it easier to change direction quickly, stay balanced when pulled wide, and recover position after a shot.’

She added: ‘Tennis is full of tiny accelerations, decelerations and split–second adjustments, so agility can matter just as much as reach.

‘A shorter player may also find it easier to get low to the ball, especially on lower–bouncing shots, slices and fast returns.’

She added that at 23, Fery is well placed to be able to recover between points and matches and to be able to tolerate repeated high–intensity efforts.

Being less experienced could also mean he is able to stay focused on the next point rather than the significance of the occasion.

‘The key point is that success in tennis is not determined by one anatomical feature,’ she added.

‘Height, limb length, strength, balance, reaction time, anticipation, emotional control and tactical intelligence all interact.

‘A shorter player may not have the same serve geometry as a much taller opponent, but if they move beautifully, read the game well and return effectively, that can become a very powerful set of advantages.’

BEIRUT (AP) — A deal between Lebanon and Israel was billed as paving the way for peace. But in Lebanon, it is deepening longtime divisions and raising fears of political paralysis or even a return to civil war.

The U.S.-brokered deal envisions an Israeli troop withdrawal from Lebanon and an eventual peace agreement between the two countries — which technically remain in a state of war nearly 80 years after Israel’s establishment. But the agreement says a full Israeli withdrawal will happen only after Hezbollah is disarmed, infuriating the Iran-backed militant group.

Lebanon’s Western-backed government and Hezbollah have exchanged angry words, and the militant group’s supporters have blocked major roads in protest. One Hezbollah lawmaker said the country would plunge into civil war if the government tries to force the group’s disarmament.

The tensions have stirred up memories of Lebanon’s devastating 1975-1990 civil war and reminded many of more recent clashes between Hezbollah gunmen and pro-government fighters in 2008. They also have raised deep questions over whether the U.S.-brokered deal will be able to get off the ground.

A resumption of the war between the U.S. and Iran would further complicate the deal’s prospects and raise the risk of renewed conflict between Israel and Hezbollah.

The deal is expected to top the agenda when Lebanese President Joseph Aoun heads to the White House on July 21.

The deal is rooted in the US war against Iran

Lebanon’s political landscape has been divided for over two decades between one coalition that is Western-backed and another that is supported by Iran and led by Hezbollah. Both camps see the outcome of the new agreement as existential.

The latest war between Israel and Hezbollah erupted in March, triggered by the joint U.S.-Israel war launched against Iran days earlier.

Hezbollah, which entered the conflict without seeking approval from the government, has sought to link the end of its war against Israel to the outcome of broader U.S.-Iran talks. The Lebanese government, trying to minimize Iran’s influence, aimed to keep the two tracks separate and negotiate a ceasefire directly with Israel.

The Lebanon-Israel deal turned the tables

The pro-Hezbollah camp was jubilant when the ceasefire deal between Iran and the U.S. explicitly called for an end to the war in Lebanon.

That led to a truce that has substantially reduced the intensity of the fighting between Israel and Hezbollah. But Israeli troops continue to occupy large swaths of southern Lebanon, and hundreds of thousands of people remain displaced from villages and city neighborhoods that have been almost entirely demolished.

The linkage to the U.S.-Iran ceasefire was widely seen as boosting Hezbollah’s standing and cementing Iran’s influence over Lebanon.

But days later, the tables turned as Israel and Lebanon announced their June 26 “framework agreement” in Washington. That deal conditioned withdrawal of Israeli forces on disarmament of Hezbollah throughout the country.

Lebanese government officials have hailed the deal as a step toward liberating occupied areas of the south and allowing the displaced to go home.

But with Israel giving no timeline for its withdrawal, Hezbollah and its supporters have accused the government of agreeing to an open-ended Israeli occupation.

Hezbollah supporters protested and blocked roads in Beirut. Some burned banners bearing the slogan “Lebanon First” — seen as a dig at the Iran-backed group. The group’s leader, Naim Kassem, called the deal a “humiliation” and said Hezbollah would not honor it.

Hassan Fadlallah, an influential Hezbollah legislator, went even further, saying the government “will not be able to enforce the agreement signed in Washington unless they go, with American support, to civil war.”

Such rhetoric brought back memories of May 2008, when the government decided to dismantle Hezbollah’s telecommunications network. The group sent gunmen to the streets and engaged in intense clashes with pro-government fighters in Beirut and elsewhere. The government was forced to annul its decision.

Hezbollah is now demanding that the government abolish its March 2 decision that considered Hezbollah’s military and security activities illegal.

Lebanon’s prime minister, Nawaf Salam, says the agreement with Israel will restore the state’s sovereignty over the entire country and has pushed back against Hezbollah’s rhetoric.

“I am not looking for a confrontation with Hezbollah but neither myself nor anyone in the government will accept to be blackmailed by Hezbollah,” Salam recently told the local LBC TV station.

In the meantime, the deal remains frozen

For now, there are no signs of the verbal threats spilling over into violence — in large part because the deal is deadlocked.

Israel and Lebanon have agreed to establish two “pilot zones” where the Israeli military is to turn over control to the Lebanese army after clearing the areas of any Hezbollah presence.

Salam has said the implementation could begin soon. But on the ground, there has been little movement.

“There is no schedule for the withdrawal or anything else,” said a Lebanese military official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to comment publicly. He said the army has received no information about when or how the Israeli withdrawal will proceed.

The initial pilot zones announced by Lebanese and Israeli officials include the towns of Froun, Ghandouriyeh and Zawtar. Israeli troops were not present in most of that area to begin with, raising questions about how a withdrawal could take place. The official said the Lebanese army had pushed for pilot zones that were larger and included more area occupied by Israeli forces.

An Israeli military official, speaking on condition of anonymity under briefing guidelines, said the army is still waiting for instructions from the political leadership on when the withdrawal will take place.

A possible political stalemate looms

Lebanon has a history of political violence, but its sectarian power-sharing system, divided among Shiite and Sunni Muslims, Christians and Druze, has also been prone to deadlock.

Powerful Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, a Hezbollah ally, has warned the deal “will not pass, and it will not be implemented in its current form.”

Wissam Lahham, a constitutional law professor at St. Joseph University in Beirut, said that under Lebanon’s constitution, a treaty is not legally binding until it is ratified by a two-thirds majority of the country’s Cabinet. A Cabinet vote has not been scheduled. Lahham said it’s not clear if the treaty would require parliamentary approval, another potential obstacle.

Kassem, in a speech Wednesday, aimed a message at the government.

“Ultimately, not a single clause of the framework agreement will be approved, and there will be nothing you can do about it,” he said.

Michael Young, senior editor at the Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center in Beirut, said the Lebanese government’s desire to keep Lebanon separate from the Iranian negotiations on national sovereignty grounds was correct “in principle” but unrealistic in practice.

“You cannot reach any kind of solution with regard to Hezbollah unless Iran is on board,” he said. “The Iranians will not give up on Hezbollah, and at the same time the Lebanese are not willing to enter into an armed conflict with Hezbollah.”

___

Associated Press writer Josef Federman in Jerusalem contributed.