Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Tech

Paramount Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Faces 12-State Lawsuit Because Streaming Wasn’t Complicated Enough

Published

on

The Paramount Skydance takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery has finally landed in court, which raises the obvious question: where was this lawsuit months ago?

The Paramount Skydance takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery has already cleared a major federal hurdle, but 12 state attorneys general have now decided that combining Paramount, Warner Bros., HBO, CNN, CBS, Max, and Paramount+ under one corporate roof may not be great for competition. Imagine noticing the house is on fire after everyone has already picked paint colors.

On July 13, 2026, a coalition led by California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed an antitrust lawsuit seeking to block Paramount Skydance’s proposed acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery. The complaint argues that the nearly $111 billion transaction, including debt, would reduce competition in theatrical film distribution, basic cable programming, streaming, and the broader entertainment market.

We have covered this story from the start, beginning with Netflix’s original agreement to acquire Warner Bros., HBO, and HBO Max, followed by Paramount’s hostile bid, the Ellison-backed bidding war, and Paramount eventually winning after Netflix stepped aside. Back in February, we noted that Paramount winning the bid was not the end of the story. Regulatory scrutiny, debt, politics, and the future of HBO, CNN, Warner Bros., Paramount+, and Max were always going to remain part of the plot. Nobody said Hollywood consolidation came with a clean third act.

Advertisement

What the Lawsuit Claims

The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California by California, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, and Washington. The states are asking the court to prevent Paramount from acquiring Warner Bros. Discovery. If Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery try to close the deal before the case is resolved, the states have warned they may seek a temporary restraining order.

The complaint argues that the merger would combine two of the nation’s five major film distributors and two of the five major owners of basic cable channels. According to the filing, the combined company would leave four companies controlling more than 85 percent of wide-release theatrical films in the United States, while the merged Paramount Warner Bros. entity and Disney would control 59 percent of U.S. basic cable.

The states also claim the merger would give the combined company control of more than 50 basic cable channels, creating greater leverage in carriage negotiations with cable and satellite distributors. In plain practical terms: fewer companies owning more essential content usually means distributors have less negotiating room, and consumers eventually get invited to pay for the party.

The lawsuit also focuses heavily on theaters. The states argue that with fewer film distributors competing for screens, theaters could face worse revenue splits, stricter limits on discounts and complimentary tickets, fewer new releases, and less incentive for studios to invest in a broad theatrical slate.

Advertisement

Paramount’s Response

Paramount Skydance Logo

Paramount has rejected the lawsuit and says the states are misreading the modern entertainment market. The company argues that the merger would create a stronger competitor against dominant streaming and technology platforms, especially Netflix, and that delaying the deal would hurt entertainment workers who have already been squeezed by changes in the business.

That is the core tension. The states are framing this as a competition problem. Paramount is framing it as a survival strategy.

Both arguments are not crazy. That is what makes this more interesting than the usual “company buys company, executives discover synergies, workers discover LinkedIn” story.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery are legacy entertainment companies trying to compete against Netflix, Amazon, Apple, YouTube, and Disney. But the way they propose to do that is by combining two historic studios, two major streaming platforms, CNN, CBS, HBO, Warner Bros., Paramount Pictures, Nickelodeon, Cartoon Network, TNT, MTV, HGTV, BET, Discovery Channel, Pluto TV, and more under one roof.

Advertisement

Netflix Is Still in the Room

Netflix may have stepped away from the Warner Bros. bidding war, but it remains central to the story. Paramount’s defense depends heavily on the idea that the combined company would be better equipped to challenge Netflix and the other tech-driven streaming giants. The states, meanwhile, argue that reducing the number of major film and cable owners is still harmful even if Netflix remains the biggest streaming target.

Netflix Word Logo

The timing is also interesting. Netflix reports Q2 2026 financial results on Thursday, July 16, 2026, at approximately 1:01 p.m. Pacific Time, with a live video interview scheduled afterward.

That earnings report lands after a rough stretch for Netflix’s stock. Recent market coverage has noted that NFLX has lost nearly 24 percent over the past three months ahead of its Q2 results. So while Paramount wants to paint Netflix as the untouchable giant, Wall Street has been reminding everyone that even the 800-pound gorilla occasionally slips on its own banana peel.

That does not weaken Paramount’s broader argument that Netflix is still the streaming benchmark. It does complicate the idea that every legacy media company must become enormous overnight to survive.

Is This About Antitrust or Politics?

The lawsuit is formally an antitrust case. The political pattern is still hard to ignore.

Advertisement

All 12 plaintiff attorneys general are Democrats: California, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, and Washington. No Republican attorney general joined the lawsuit.

The governor breakdown is slightly different. Eleven of the 12 plaintiff states currently have Democratic governors. Nevada is the exception, with Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo.

That does not automatically make the lawsuit partisan theater. State attorneys general often pursue antitrust cases for policy reasons, economic reasons, consumer protection reasons, and, yes, political reasons. Sometimes all of the above sit in the same conference room and pretend they came separately.

But the political backdrop matters. The Justice Department under President Donald Trump’s administration cleared the deal in June without requiring divestitures, while Bonta and other Democratic attorneys general continued to signal concern. Criticism over political influence has largely fallen along party lines, with Democratic officials questioning whether federal regulators gave the deal enough scrutiny.

Advertisement

Then there is CNN. Any deal that puts CNN under the same corporate structure as CBS and Paramount under David Ellison was always going to attract political attention. Pretending otherwise would require a level of innocence normally reserved for Hallmark movies and first-time streaming subscribers.

Paramount Has Cleared Some International Hurdles

Paramount also has a fair point when it argues that the deal is not being rejected everywhere. The company has received regulatory or competition clearances in several international markets, including Australia, China, Canada, Saudi Arabia, Ukraine, Serbia, and North Macedonia. It has also received foreign-direct-investment approvals in countries including Germany, Slovenia, Belgium, Czechia, New Zealand, Italy, France, and Romania.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

That does not mean the transaction is home free. Reviews remain active in major markets, including the European Union and the U.K., where regulators have been looking at competition, media plurality, foreign investment, and the potential impact of combining HBO Max, Paramount+, CNN International, Cartoon Network, Nickelodeon, and other services under one corporate roof.

Advertisement

So yes, Paramount can accurately say the deal has cleared some meaningful international hurdles. But the lawsuit from 12 U.S. states, along with continuing U.K. and European reviews, makes it clear that approval is still very much a moving target.

The California Exit Threat

One of the more aggressive subplots involves Paramount possibly leaving California.

Semafor reported on Monday that advisers close to David Ellison have urged him to consider moving Paramount’s corporate headquarters and reallocating some of the company’s planned spending outside California if Bonta sued to block the deal. The same report stressed that no decision has been made and that the idea may be brinkmanship.

Texas is the obvious political shorthand here because major companies including Chevron, Oracle, and Tesla have already moved headquarters out of California and toward Texas in recent years. But the more immediate production option mentioned in the reporting is New Jersey, where Paramount already signed a major lease at 1888 Studios in Bayonne.

Advertisement

That is where the story gets awkward. New Jersey is one of the 12 states suing to block the deal.

So if Paramount was hoping to use New Jersey as part of a “California is hostile, we are moving somewhere friendlier” argument, Trenton just walked into the room holding a legal complaint and gave studio developers, local contractors, and Monmouth County homeowners one more reason to check Zillow with mixed emotions.

What About Paramount’s Bayonne Studio Plans?

Paramount signed a minimum 10-year lease for more than 285,000 square feet at 1888 Studios in Bayonne in October 2025. The larger 1888 Studios project is planned as a 1.5 million to 1.6 million square foot production campus on the Bayonne waterfront, with 23 soundstages and major production support facilities.

There is no evidence right now that Paramount is walking away from that lease or that the lawsuit directly jeopardizes the Bayonne project. That needs to be stated clearly.

Advertisement

But future expansion is a fair question. If Paramount is rethinking where to place corporate offices, production spending, and future studio commitments, the lawsuit complicates New Jersey’s pitch. The state still has generous film and digital media tax incentives, and Bayonne remains a serious production play. But joining a lawsuit against Paramount’s biggest strategic deal is not exactly how one usually sends a fruit basket or box of Taylor Ham.

Netflix Fort Monmouth Keeps Moving

Netflix Studio Complex in Fort Monmouth New Jersey Artist Conception
Netflix Studio Complex in Fort Monmouth New Jersey (Artist Conception)

The New Jersey production story does not begin and end in Bayonne.

Netflix Studios Fort Monmouth is moving forward on the Jersey Shore. Officially, Netflix celebrated a construction milestone on June 23, 2026, with the installation of the final structural beam on Stages 3 and 4. The $1 billion project spans more than 292 acres across Oceanport and Eatontown and is planned to include 12 soundstages totaling nearly 500,000 square feet. Phase 1A remains on track for summer 2027, with Phase 1B targeted for fall 2028.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

From a local perspective, the project looks very real. I live about two miles away and drive through the area a few times a week as a shortcut home. Three of the soundstages on the eastern side of the property appear to be in an advanced stage of construction.

Advertisement

The broader point is that New Jersey has become a serious production battleground. Netflix is building at Fort Monmouth. Paramount has leased space in Bayonne. Lionsgate has been part of the Newark studio conversation. New Jersey has been openly trying to become a major East Coast production hub. This lawsuit may not stop any of that, but it does make the politics a lot messier.

What This Means for Viewers

For consumers, the biggest questions are not about corporate headquarters or which governor gets to cut a ribbon. The real concern is what this deal could mean for the services, studios, news divisions, theaters, and catalogs people actually watch.

If Paramount+ and HBO Max eventually combine, prices could rise, bundles could change, and another major entertainment library could end up under one corporate roof. Theatrical output is another major concern. Fewer major studios can mean fewer wide releases, less negotiating leverage for theaters, and less incentive to take risks on films that are not obvious franchise plays.

There is also the question of what happens to Warner Bros. catalog titles, HBO, CNN, CBS News, Paramount Pictures, and physical media. Will those assets be treated as distinct creative and editorial brands, or simply as inventory to be optimized? The lawsuit does not answer those questions, but it does slow the process and force Paramount to defend the deal in court after already clearing a major federal hurdle.

Advertisement

The Bottom Line

The 12-state lawsuit is the most serious legal threat yet to Paramount’s Warner Bros. Discovery takeover. It does not guarantee the deal will collapse, but it could delay closing, increase pressure on Paramount, and force more public scrutiny of how much media power one company should hold.

Paramount’s best argument is that legacy Hollywood needs scale to compete with Netflix, Amazon, Apple, YouTube, and Disney. The states’ best argument is that solving one competitive problem by creating a larger concentration problem does not magically become consumer-friendly because a streaming app is involved.

And then there is the politics. All 12 attorneys general suing are Democrats, the Trump Justice Department already cleared the deal, and CNN sits right in the middle of the transaction like a neon sign blinking “this will be normal.” Sure it will.

Advertisement

If Paramount really wants to move more production or corporate power out of California, New Jersey and Texas will both be part of the conversation. But New Jersey’s participation in the lawsuit makes that idea more complicated, especially with Paramount already attached to Bayonne and Netflix racing ahead at Fort Monmouth.

Hollywood consolidation was already messy. Now it has federal court filings, state politics, Netflix earnings week, and a possible headquarters fight.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

House Votes For Permanent Daylight Saving Time

Published

on

The House voted 308-117 to pass the Sunshine Protection Act, which would make daylight saving time permanent nationwide and end the twice-yearly clock change. The bill faces an uncertain future in the Senate, “where one G.O.P. leader said it was unclear whether it could move ahead and at least one Republican appears inclined to try to block it,” reports The New York Times. Some sleep experts oppose permanent daylight saving time, arguing that year-round standard time better aligns with circadian rhythms and winter morning safety. The New York Times reports: President Trump has championed the effort to save an extra hour of daylight before nightfall and make the time zone permanent, describing the ritual of moving clocks forward in the spring and back in the fall a “ridiculous, twice yearly production.” “We are going with the far more popular alternative, Saving Daylight, which gives you a longer, brighter Day,” Mr. Trump wrote in a social media post in May. “And who can be against that.”

A sizable bloc of Florida Republicans in Congress is leading the charge on legislation that would do just that, mandating daylight saving time nationwide for the entire year. Representative Vern Buchanan of the Tampa Bay area is backing the bill, and Representative Anna Paulina Luna, another Tampa Bay-area Republican, cosponsored it. House leaders agreed to allow a vote on the measure this week as a sweetener for Ms. Luna in their efforts to persuade her to lift a legislative blockade she had maintained as she sought to force Senate action on a voting restriction bill Mr. Trump has championed.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Degree-holders are now the largest group at S’pore career centres. 58% found a job this way.

Published

on

Disclaimer: Unless otherwise stated, any opinions expressed below belong solely to the author. Data sourced from Singapore Ministry of Manpower and Randstad.

In the age of the Internet, most of us are used to looking for a job online, googling for offers on one of the numerous employment boards or LinkedIn. Data in Randstad’s recently published Employer Brand Research 2026 appears to confirm that this is the case.

Image Credit: Randstad

Because of that, it might seem easy to forget that there are many direct ways to search for a new job. However, according to the data released by Singapore’s Ministry of Manpower in Jun, they have been growing in popularity in recent years.

More Singaporeans are looking for help

In the past decade, the number of jobseekers looking for assistance at local career centres has very nearly tripled, from just over 25,000 in 2016 to over 73,000 in 2025.

Source: Ministry of Manpower

Career centres are more than just a public recruitment agency.

They provide direct, individual, human assistance and coaching. They interview candidates, help prepare their resumes, advise them on potential upskilling and provide job matching services, connecting them to the right employers.

Advertisement

In the past, they may have been seen as a sort of “last resort” for desperate jobseekers (typically of lower educational attainment), who couldn’t land a job by applying directly. Today, they seem to have gone mainstream, attracting younger and more educated jobseekers as well.

Degree-holders have increased their share among candidates using CC services, from barely over one-fifth 10 years ago to nearly 40% last year, becoming the single largest educational group using this avenue of public job assistance.

Source: Ministry of Manpower

More broadly, back in 2016, the split between secondary and lower-educated candidates and those with post-secondary education (including diplomas and degrees) was roughly 50:50.

Today, the share of those with tertiary education has risen to over 70%.

Source: Ministry of Manpower

Sign of a crisis or a sign of the times?

Sceptics may see this as a sign of a growing labour market crisis, where jobs are so difficult to secure that even the highly educated Singaporeans are forced to seek specialist help instead of simply applying and attending interviews.

That might seem so, but there are two pieces of data which suggest otherwise.

Advertisement

Firstly, the resident and citizen unemployment rates remain low, at around or slightly below 3%.

Secondly, the success rates for job placements through career centres have been going up, even as the number of candidates has grown significantly over the past 10 years.

Source: Ministry of Manpower

Overall, two out of three candidates have managed to find a job through a CC last year, including 58% of degree-holders—in both cases, these are the highest numbers on record.

Educated candidates typically find it a bit harder than those looking for simpler jobs, since their specialisation is narrower and expectations regarding pay and working conditions are higher. Nevertheless, more than half of them were successfully helped in career centres, even as demand is surging.

As it turns out, even in the digital era, some good, old-fashioned career advice, coaching and human help still work very well.

Advertisement
  • Read other articles we’ve written on Singapore’s job landscape here.

Featured Image Credit: Careers Connect (Lifelong Learning Institute)/ Google Street View

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Can You Put Any Deck On A Mower? What You Need To Know Before Trying To Replace One

Published

on





Yard care can take more time than expected and if you find that you’re spending too much time mowing, it’s possible you don’t have the right sized lawn mower deck. But before you decide to buy a bigger one, beware that even if a new deck looks like it may fit, that does not mean it will. It all comes down to individual manufacturer design and how a deck is engineered to fit a specific model.

Each lawn mower manufacturer builds the frame, mounting points, and lift system around a fixed deck setup. This means that even decks with the same cutting width may not attach or operate correctly on another model. The mower’s PTO system also plays a major role, because both manual and electric PTO setups use different configurations that must match up precisely with the deck’s drive. The deck’s lift components are designed for very specific pivot points as well, which means that even small differences can prohibit a proper fit.

The key factor to remember is that because mower decks are designed to fit specific models, your best move is to verify part numbers before moving forward. Simply buying a deck from the same manufacturer as your mower isn’t enough, as similar setups may not be compatible with your exact model. If you’re browsing for a replacement deck from another manufacturer, be sure it’s compatible with your mower and always buy from a reputable retailer.

Advertisement

Understanding lawn mower deck size and why it matters

Lawn mower deck size is actually the cutting width of the mower, or the total reach of grass that’s cut in a single pass. For example, a 42-inch deck cuts a 42-inch path, while a 60-inch deck covers five feet at a time. Technically speaking, a larger deck does increase overall efficiency because you don’t need as many passes while mowing as you would with a smaller deck.

Replacing a deck isn’t the same as replacing the mower, but going with a bigger deck in order to save time does come with a price. That’s because a larger deck generally requires more engine power to operate. You’ll also need more space while mowing, which can be challenging when working in tight corners. This is why manufacturers match the deck size to the mower’s design, so the components will work together to deliver the expected performance.

Advertisement

Installing an Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) deck usually involves a process specific to the mower as well. Typically, the deck is lowered and disconnected from the mounting points and support rods. The drive belt is then removed from the engine pulley and the deck is slid out from under the mower. New deck installation follows the same steps in reverse. In many cases, this can be a complex process requiring precise connections that must be set correctly. Otherwise, the deck may not operate properly.



Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Benchmarking Repairability Scores With An Asus Tablet

Published

on

A few years ago, France introduced a mandatory repairability score for consumer goods like laptops and tablets. It involves five criteria that range from documentation and availability of spare parts to ease of disassembly, with the manufacturer using a government-provided checklist to determine their score.

Recently Asus determined that their Asus ROG Flow Z13 – model GZ302EA – scored a 10 out of 10 using this system. This led [iFixit] to run the same tablet/laptop hybrid through their own rating system.

You can find the filled-out spreadsheet for this device here, with this Asus-provided site showing a list of devices that all score a 10/10 or a measly 9.9/10 according to this system. As a self-reported score it is hard to take it as the objective truth, as there is every incentive for the manufacturer to tweak the truth to their own benefit and gloss over inconveniences. This is where it’s interesting to compare it with [iFixit]’s 7/10 score.

On documentation, Asus gives itself a perfect score but [iFixit] finds it to be incomplete. Removal of one fan requires the disassembly of the cooler with its liquid metal thermal interface on the CPU. The wireless card, and most ports, are soldered to the mainboard. On the bright side, after you get the screen off, the insides are quite modular, which is a plus.

[iFixit] dings three points: for documentation, soldered-down components, and a fan accessibility glitch. Parts accessibility outside of France is also significantly harder, but one can hardly blame the French system for that. Overall the French self-reported rating would seem to be a fair start, but depending on which criteria you define as required you may find yourself disagreeing with the score.

Advertisement

In the case of LPDDR5 RAM one could argue for example that with LPCAMM2 modules soldering RAM onto the mainboard ought to be a thing of the past, and Wi-Fi modules should always be removable as well. You can take that up with the French regulators.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

The Inventor of Apple’s FaceID Wants to Analyze Your Brain’s Health With AI

Published

on

The co-inventor of Apple’s FaceID and Vision Pro technology has spent the last six years building a frontier artificial intelligence model that could one day help decode electrical activity in the brain to diagnose cognitive disorders.

Now, Gidi Littwin’s startup, Hemispheric, has raised $52 million in funding after gathering data on 100,000 people’s brains to train deep learning models to examine the brain without the need for invasive procedures.

Littwin left Apple in 2020, looking for a change. He found it when his Hemispheric cofounder Hagai Lalazar cold-messaged him on LinkedIn. Lalazar had begun to develop artificial intelligence to study the brain without the need for surgery, and was looking for a commercially minded cofounder to drive the company forward. By the time he found Littwin, he had spoken to around 75 candidates.

Littwin had helped develop FaceID, and at that time was working on hand-tracking for an augmented reality product, the Vision Pro. As part of this, he had to collect what he told WIRED were “hundreds of thousands of subjects’ worth of data” to train the deep learning models powering the technology.

Advertisement

“There were massive data collection operations behind these projects and we knew we had to build something very similar at Hemispheric,” Littwin says, “and we have.”

Because each individual’s brain activity looks different, doctors have largely had to rely on subjective questionnaires and behavioral observations to diagnose depression, Alzheimer’s, and Parkinson’s. To get around that, Littwin and Hagai collected their “most prized possession:” a quarter of a million hours of brain data from 100,000 paid volunteers across Asia, as well as Tel Aviv and Boston. Subjects undertook a series of activities that look like games but activated different parts of their brains.

That data helped train a frontier model, which infers brain function from electrical activity within the skull in the same way that large language models deduce meaning by statistically analyzing text. They then tested the generalized model on subsets of people, including those diagnosed with PTSD, schizophrenia, and depression and said the model made accurate deductions about the individuals’ brain health. The team is currently working on a clinical study to test whether their model can diagnose and even predict Alzheimer’s.

The team will submit their first product, which will be used to study PTSD, to the FDA for approval early next year. They hope that will allow them to roll the product out to the public later in 2027.

Advertisement

To help diagnose a cognitive disorder, a patient wears a lightweight EEG headset that measures electrical activity in the brain for around 15 minutes while interacting with an app on a tablet. Hemispheric says its AI model will then help clinicians decode the signals to make diagnoses, select the most effective intervention by making predictions about treatment, and monitor progress.

“The future that we envision is one where this is akin to a blood test,” Lalazar says. “The device is going to be very, very cheap; it will be able to be sold and distributed throughout mental health clinics, hospitals, and even psychologists’ offices.”

AI-assisted diagnostic tools for conditions like lung cancer are already in clinical use and speeding up access to treatment across Europe. Meanwhile, AI giants including OpenAI and Anthropic are expanding into health care, intensifying competition for the raft of startups in the space.

Hemispheric has raised early-stage funding from investors including American and Israeli venture capital firms and individual investors, among them early Uber-backer Howard Morgan. They will use the money to advance partnerships with governments, healthcare organizations, and pharmaceutical firms, hire more in the US, and work towards regulatory approval. They also plan to measure more brain data from millions of people in an effort to improve their model

Advertisement

The pair are also developing their own brain scanners to obtain information that the company believes can provide more useful data for its models than traditional EEGs. “These devices were never built for machine learning and definitely not deep learning,” Littwin says.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Riot is reviving old League of Legends even as it prepares the game’s biggest overhaul ever

Published

on

Something to look forward to: League of Legends has joined the popular trend of long-running live service games that introduce classic modes to emulate their early years. However, instead of reverting to a specific moment in the game’s evolution, Riot Games will combine elements of how LoL felt between 2009 and 2013.

The League of Legends Classic game client is now available to download. The new mode, set to open at the end of this month, will focus on characters and gameplay elements from the game’s first three seasons.

Rather than simply relaunching League of Legends 1.0, Riot decided to start with Season 3 as a base and add features from the prior two seasons with a few modern touches. For example, while it revives the early Summoner’s Rift map, the company decided to improve readability by enhancing lighting, shadows, and textures.

Classic mode will include Summoner’s Rift, the original 40 playable characters from League of Legends’ 2009 debut and an additional 20 characters hand-selected from the game’s first four years. Items, runes, builds, masteries, skins, and other mechanics from this era will also return, including Atmogs, the Metagolem setup, and Zz’Rot Portal.

Advertisement

Playing rounds in Classic mode will unlock characters through a new progression system called Classic Level, which runs alongside progression in the main game – though players can immediately select characters they have already purchased. Another new progression system, called Summoner’s Journey, begins at Classic Level 10 and allows players to earn items without the pressure of ranked play.

League of Legends Classic will debut with a player-versus-player draft queue, co-op, and custom game modes. Runes and Masteries must be pre-selected before starting a Classic match. Both are unlocked only via gameplay and cannot be upgraded, as they are all set to the old Tier 3 baseline.

Although Classic mode aims to remind players how League of Legends felt before more than a decade of additions and balance changes, it will not remain static. Riot plans to release patches and balance updates according to player feedback, favoring users with higher Classic levels.

Meanwhile, fans are still awaiting League Next, which Riot teased late last year. The update, expected in 2027, will be the largest ever, bringing significant changes to the graphics, gameplay, and technology underpinning League of Legends. With a new onboarding experience, optional WASD controls, and changes to Summoner’s Rift, Riot aims to reverse declining player numbers by making the influential MOBA more accessible to newcomers.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Drake Anthony Recreates the Mechanical Bulb First Seen in 1675

Published

on

Drake Anthony StyroPyro Mechanical Bulb 1675
Drake Anthony spends a lot of time in the workshop, continually pushing the boundaries of what you can produce with basic materials. His recent video on the styro pyro 2 channel attempts to replicate a phenomenon discovered over three centuries ago. The ultimate result is a glass flask that emits visible light when shaken, eliminating the need for batteries, wiring, or other external power sources.



The story begins in 1675, with French astronomer Jean Picard out on the streets of Paris on a dark, clear night. He’s carrying a mercury barometer, and as he moves, a small glow begins to form in the glass tube above it. This light appears only when he stirs the mercury and exposes some new glass for it to play on. The whole thing is a strange sight, which he describes to several of his scientific friends at the time and ends up giving the nickname ‘barometric light’.


YIERBLUE Rechargeable Spotlight Flashlight with 2000000 High Lumen LED, IP67 Waterproof Long Running Spot…
  • EXTRA BRIGHT HEAVY DUTY FLASHLIGHT: Its brightness is several times that of the small model.This extra bright LED spotlight casts a super bright…
  • WATERPROOF & FLOATING, IMPACT RESISTANT: This spot lights outdoor handheld is IP67 waterproof and submersible up to 3ft, and even float back up to the…
  • LONG TIME LIGHTING & POWER PORT: Built-in rechargeable batteries, YIERBLUE’s proprietary battery technology give you up to 9 hours lighting on lower…

It takes the scientists some time to figure out what’s going on, but friction turns out to be the key to everything. When mercury flows smoothly over a clean glass surface, it leaves a trail of electric charge that can travel through the air inside the container. When that electric charge strikes the gas molecules within, they begin to emit light, which is similar to how neon signs work, except that the energy comes from friction and contact between the two materials.

Drake Anthony StyroPyro Mechanical Bulb 1675
Anthony sets out on a journey to recreate this entire effect from scratch. First, he takes a round glass flask and uses a propane-oxygen flame to create a slender glass stem for it. Glassblowing was a completely new ability for him, and things became even more difficult because he only has limited depth vision in one eye. Nonetheless, he completed it successfully. After attaching the stem, he connects the flask to a vacuum pump and gradually drops the pressure to approximately 5 millitors, leaving only a whisper of the original air inside. There was still some residual gas and mercury vapour within, which he later learned was necessary for the light to work.

Drake Anthony StyroPyro Mechanical Bulb 1675
The next step is to transfer the mercury into the flask. He puts a little more in and then screws the top back on. When he initially shakes the flask in full darkness, you may see a faint blue-white glimmer. The reason it’s so faint is that the mercury he’s using isn’t pure, which limits the amount of charge that accumulates when the mercury passes over the glass. Even so, the light illuminates whenever he shakes the device, which is a pretty good indicator given that the technology is nearly 350 years old.

Drake Anthony StyroPyro Mechanical Bulb 1675
Anthony wanted to brighten up his own light display, so he started experimenting with adding little amounts of noble gases to the flask after he had the vacuum running. It was a feeling that starting with neon at around 100 torr would be a good place to start, and boy was it correct, as shaking the flask generated a really dazzling light that appeared almost electric and could be seen in regular room lighting. The neon seemed to make the entire process more easier from beginning to end, getting the discharge started and maintaining it flowing.

Drake Anthony StyroPyro Mechanical Bulb 1675
The other experiments he carried out in identical flasks were quite interesting. Adding copper pellets appeared to work just as well as glass in producing a decent light through friction, but then he tossed in a few of chunks of Teflon, which resulted in a few little sparks. The Galinstan experiment was similarly a failure, as he attempted to use a liquid metal alloy instead of mercury, but it stuck to the flask’s glass walls, making it nearly difficult to generate a sufficient charge. As expected, employing a straight tube was far less effective than using a curved or bent one since the gas would simply break contact and re-form whenever it encountered an edge, giving him even more possibilities to build a charge.

Drake Anthony StyroPyro Mechanical Bulb 1675
Anthony decided to add a Tesla coil to the mix just for fun, to give the gas within the flask a little extra kick from the outside. And let me tell you, the results were just plain cool, as the coil supplied a little more juice to the previously charged region, resulting in some amazing plasma displays with nice pinching effects and distinct color zones.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Astronauts Take First X-Rays In Space

Published

on

Astronauts on SpaceX’s Fram2 mission successfully captured diagnostic X-ray images in orbit for the first time. The milestone gives space medicine a second imaging option beyond ultrasound and could help future crews diagnose injuries, inspect equipment, and support longer missions to the moon or beyond. Popular Science reports: Commercial off-the-shelf X-ray machines like the ice cooler-sized MinXray TR90BH now allow users to perform scans on subjects far away from traditional facilities. In 2022, [Mayo Clinic researcher Sheyna Gifford] assisted in preparing a crew to successfully generate digital X-rays while experiencing microgravity during a parabolic flight. Gifford’s team then spent years collaborating with SpaceX to plan another feasibility study. This time, they didn’t want to operate an X-ray machine aboard an aircraft simulating the conditions in space — they intended to use the equipment during an orbital mission.

The process was detailed in a recently published study in the journal Radiology, and focuses on last year’s Fram2 mission. Instead of days of medical training, astronauts spent only four hours learning how to use their portable radiography device. They then took preflight X-rays of a hand, forearm, chest, abdomen, and pelvis ahead of their SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket launch on March 31, 2025. Once in orbit, the team calibrated the system before testing their MinXray on the same body parts as well as a smartwatch.

Once the crew returned, a trio of independent radiologists reviewed the orbital X-ray images based on their positioning, spatial and contrast resolutions, and general scan quality. Although positioning scores were slightly decreased for the central body images, every other scan held up to similar examples created on Earth. Meanwhile, the astronauts reported that using the machine was easy despite minimal prior coaching. Looking ahead, researchers hope to conduct further X-ray tests during orbital missions, while continuing to reduce the overall size of equipment.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

I test 4K Blu-rays for a living and these are my 6 picks from Amazon’s big sale, including reference-level discs from Disney, Marvel, and 20th Century Studios that I use for AV testing

Published

on

If you’re looking to add more 4K Blu-rays to your collection, then Disney’s Summer Days, Movie Nights 4K Blu-ray sale has arrived at the perfect time, where it’s 2 for £30 on discs including titles from Disney, Marvel, Star Wars and 20th Century Studios. The same 2 for £30 sale is also live at HMV.

I regularly test 4K Blu-ray as part of our monthly Blu-ray Bounty feature, where we test the best new 4K releases. I’ve picked six discs from the sale that all featured as part of the Blu-ray Bounty, so I know just how good they look and sound.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Microsoft just released its biggest Patch Tuesday ever, with a mammoth 622 fixes including three dangerous zero-days

Published

on


  • Microsoft’s July 2026 Patch Tuesday fixed a record 622 vulnerabilities, including 58 critical, two exploited in the wild, and one publicly disclosed, plus 428 Chromium bugs
  • Actively abused flaws include CVE‑2026‑56155 (AD FS privilege escalation) and CVE‑2026‑56164 (SharePoint privilege escalation), alongside notable issues in BitLocker and Copilot
  • Surge in fixes is linked to Microsoft’s use of Anthropic’s Mythos AI, with patch volumes rising sharply since its adoption

Microsoft has released its July 2026 Patch Tuesday download, marking another record-breaking update, addressing hundreds of flaws across the ecosystem.

The release, which is currently rolling out to Microsoft users, fixes a staggering 622 vulnerabilities, including 58 critical-severity ones, two that were observed as being abused in the wild, and one which has already been publicly disclosed.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025