Summer programmes designed for young people are an ideal way to upskill and advance a STEM-based education.

It is not only nice to have a break from school during the summer months, it is an absolute necessity. We all need to recharge the batteries now and then. But three months is a long time and you may be looking to fill some of that time with an activity that is both fun and educational. 

STEM and STEAM programmes for young people are a perfect way to break up the summer months. Designed to incorporate traditional and emerging skills, STEM summer camps enable kids to connect with others, build foundational knowledge and work on the elements of STEM that could form the basis for a future career. 

So, what is currently available to Ireland’s young people?

Eco-Unesco

For Dublin-based children aged between 10 and 12 years old, Eco-Unesco is running the Eco-Explorers Summer Camp Dublin, from 20 August until 24 August, 10am to 3pm. Students can learn about nature, ecology and biodiversity, via outdoor adventures, interactive games and hands-on activities.  

For teenagers aged 13 to 16, there is the Green Teen Summer Camp, which is available in Cork and Dublin in late July and early August – make sure to check out what dates are available in your city. Through day trips, guided tours, interactive workshops and games, young people will explore local biodiversity and learn about sustainability.

All programmes are €195 per week and more dates may be added depending on demand. 

Trinity Walton Club

Dublin’s Trinity Walton Club, which is based out of the Trinity College campus, has multiple camps open to curious young minds looking to get more involved with STEM subjects this summer, ahead of the return to school.

Starting on 20 July and ending 24 July, and running from 10am to 2pm, the Assemble course, which is a €305 five-day camp, shows students how coding, sensors and data can be used to design the cities of the future.

There is also the Ignite STEM Entrepreneurship camp, running from 27 July to 31 July, 10am to 3pm, for €365 for the five days. Running in partnership with Portal, Trinity’s ideas workspace, this programme teaches students to work in teams, extend their existing innovative ideas, brainstorm new ideas, move their innovation through business development plans and explore what it might take to bring their ideas forward to the market.

Running in the same time period as Ignite, at €305 for five days, secondary-aged students can avail of the Connect Camp, designed to give them an idea of how to code across real-world applications. It is purposefully broad, giving students a chance to try things out and see what they enjoy. 

Students will build simple games and interactive programs, create simulations to model real-world systems, explore how code can be used to analyse and visualise data, control devices like Arduino using code, and get a glimpse into how software and apps are developed. It is described as a good fit for students new to coding and curious about its potential.  

Designer Minds

Running throughout July and August, Designer Minds has camps all over Ireland that are designed to teach children aged six to 12 the fundamentals of STEAM via interactive activities, hands-on projects and teamwork. Intended for children from first class all the way through to sixth, it is a five-day, 20-hour programme costing €180 and the time varies depending on which programme you select. There are also discounts available for siblings and early-bird registrants. Make sure to check out the website to see which dates are available in your area.

WhizzKids

Facilitated by a number of universities across Ireland, WhizzKids camps are running until August, and offer national and secondary school-aged kids the opportunity to engage with digital skills via courses in coding, animation, video game development, web design, 3D design and other disciplines. The classes, which are broken up by age, are suited to children of all abilities. The programme has multiple start dates and participating regions include Limerick, Cork, Athlone, Tipperary, Galway and Dublin, among others.  

Connemara Maths Academy

There is arguably no more beautiful setting for a week-long summer camp than Connemara. At the Connemara Maths Academy, students aged seven to 17 can take part in STEAM workshops and a range of fun outdoor activities and sports, with the prices ranging from the low hundreds to more than €800 (with a code), depending on whether you are a boarder and on the length of the programme.

The STEAM portion of the programme includes activities such as: AI model building; robotics; coding; music tech; stop-motion animation; science experiments; entrepreneurship; art; 3D scanning; 3D modelling; 3D printing; website design; movie making; rockets, solar, wind and hydro projects; and engineering, among others.

There is a strict no-phones policy also, which allows participants to truly engage with nature in one of Ireland’s most breathtaking spots. If you are interested, consider booking soon – the last available week is from Sunday 19 July to Saturday 25 July. 

Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.

Focal Bathys: French audio company Focal is known for its high-end speakers and headphones. You might call it the Bowers & Wilkins of France. Back in 2022, it finally did done what a lot of high-end audio companies have had to do in this age of on-the-go wireless music listening: They made active noise-canceling Bluetooth headphones. Easily one of the best-sounding wireless headphones, the pricey Bathys (now down to $600 from their list price of $850) feature not only wireless connectivity but also a built-in digital-to-analog converter for USB wired listening with any computer, smartphone or tablet with USB-C. Read the full review.

Noble Fokus Apollo: Noble is an audiophile brand known more for its in-ear monitor headphones, but it released a wireless noise-canceling headphone called the Fokus Apollo a couple of years ago that sounds terrific and features a special dual-driver design that combines a 40mm dynamic driver with a 14.5mm planar-magnetic driver (the upgraded $699 Fokus Apollo Pro arrived in May of 2026). The result is rich, open sound, with tight bass and excellent treble detail and clarity, especially for a wireless headphone (it sounds a tad better in wired mode but it’s not a huge difference). It’s more dynamic than many monitor headphones that have a flatter, more neutral sound profile, but it still leans toward being an accurate, well-balanced headphone.

Anker Soundcore Space One: While the newer Soundcore Space 2 offer a more streamlined design and beter performance across the board, the Soundcore Space One by Anker are still a decent at less $100, offering a strong feature set along with good sound quality and performance. They can’t compete sound-wise with many of the premium noise-canceling models, but you don’t feel like you’re giving up that much on the sound front to save a good deal of money. They lack a bit of that natural, refined quality you look for in a great set of cans, but the Space One sound respectable, with decent clarity and bass definition and measure up well to the more expensive Soundcore Space 45.

CMF Headphone Pro: Nothing started out with a few different wireless earbuds but has now branched into the over-ear headphones market with its eye-catching Nothing Headphone (1) and the budget-oriented CMF Headphone Pro, which also have a pretty unique look and feature interchangeable ear pads in a few different color options. I was expecting all that much from these headphones, but after using them for a week, they check a lot of boxes for a top value headphone, including a comfortable fit (they pretty lightweight at 283 grams), decent build quality and good sound quality that’s highlighted by powerful bass that can be dialed up or down with a slider control on the left ear cup (you can also tweak the sound in the companion app). The Skullcandy Crusher 2 headphones have a similar slider, but the CMF’s bass doesn’t get to head-rattling levels (the Crusher 2’s bass literally makes the headphones vibrate).

Earfun Wave Pro: Earfun has made some very solid budget earbuds, and now it’s entered the full-size ANC headphone space with a few different over-ear models, including the Wave Pro (add the code EWPROCNET at checkout on Amazon to receive an additional 10% off). While they may not sound as good as premium noise-canceling headphones from Bose or Sony, they’re comfortable to wear, feature decent sound with punchy bass (they’re a bit lacking in clarity and bass definition compared to more expensive models), and they offer respectable noise canceling (you can toggle between two levels of ANC) and voice-calling performance. The headphones do come with a cable for wired listening — you can plug into an inflight entertainment system — but the noise canceling cuts off when you’re in wired mode, which is unfortunate.

Edifier W830NB: The Edifier W830NB remain a good value noise-canceling headphone pick. They look slightly more premium than their predecessor, W820NB Plus, and and are fairly lightweight (265 grams) and comfortable, with cushy memory foam ear pads. They also sound very good for their price, offering decent clarity and fairly well-defined bass with an amply wide sound stage (they lack the refinement and depth of higher-end headphones, but you can’t expect the world from sub-$80 headphones). You can tweak the sound profile in Edifier’s companion app for iOS and Android.

QCY H3 Pro: QCY is another Chinese brand like Tribit, Earfun and plenty of others that make budget-priced headphones that sound better than you’d think they would for their relatively low price (the company says the Q stands for quality, C stands for creative and Y stands for youth). Its new-for-2024 H3 Pro headphones are similar to models in this price range from 1More, Tribit and Edifier, but they arguably sound a touch better and I found them relatively comfortable to wear, as they feature a lightweight design and memory foam ear pads.

Bose QuietComfort Headphones: When Bose released its new flagship QuietComfort Ultra Headphones in late 2023, it also replaced the QuietComfort 45s with a slightly updated model simply called the QuietComfort Headphones. Like the QC 45s, this model carries on the comfortable tried-and-true legacy QuietComfort design that’s been around for a few generations that a lot of people continue to love. The QC Ultra Headphones add Bose’s new Immersive Audio feature and have a more refined design with some metal parts (they also have Bluetooth 5.3 instead of Bluetooth 5.1). But the QuietComfort Headphones still have good sound (the Ultras offer a small step up in sound quality), excellent noise canceling and strong voice-calling performance.

Sony WH-1000XM5: Sony has released its new-for-2025 WH-1000XM6 headphones, but its former flagship model, the XM5 is still an excellent headphone that’s often on sale for closer to $300. Their noise-canceling, voice-calling and sound isn’t quite as good as what the XM6 offers (the XM6 sounds a little more detailed with improved bass performance) and the XM6 has a dual-hinge design that allows them to fold up, not just fold flat. As a result, the XM6’s case is a little smaller. Additionally, the XM6 is powered by a new QN3 chip that Sony says delivers 7 times the performance of the QN1 chip found in the XM5s. All that said, while the jump in performance from the XM5 to the XM6 is certainly noticeable, it isn’t huge; the XM5 still offers good sound, noise-canceling and voice-calling performance that should satisfy most people. Read my Sony WH-1000XM5 review.

Sennheiser Accentum Plus: If you can’t afford Sennheiser’s flagship Momentum 4 Wireless headphones or other premium models from Bose, Sony and Apple, the Sennheiser Accentum Plus is a good midrange alternative that doesn’t quite offer the same performance as those higher-end models. However, it does offers better build quality and sound than most budget noise canceling headphones. In essence, these are a slightly stripped down version of the Momentum 4 Wireless and share a similar aesthetic and the same touch controls but feature different drivers (the Momentum Wireless 4 have larger 42mm drivers and offer richer, more detailed sound with slightly better bass performance). Still, these sound good for the money, offer respectable noise canceling and support USB-C audio wired listening and the AptX Adaptive audio codec that’s compatible with some Android devices.

Master & Dynamic MH40 (2nd gen): All of Master & Dynamic’s headphones are well-built and have a unique retro-modern look. The higher-end MW75 has active noise canceling and sounds a little better than the updated MH40 ($400), which features new drivers and a new chipset that delivers improved sound and performance. The MH40 sounds more refined than its predecessor, with better clarity and definition, and now offers support for the AAC and AptX audio codecs, plus improved voice-calling performance. Additionally, you can plug its USB-C cable into a computer or Android smartphone for a wired digital connection for high-resolution audio. Battery life is rated at a healthy 30 hours.

Shure Aonic 50 Gen 2: Many of us liked Shure’s original Aonic 50 headphones, but they had relatively mediocre noise cancellation. Well, the 2nd-gen version addresses that issue — the noise canceling is much improved — and Shure has more than doubled the battery life to around 45 hours (they now have a quick-charge feature) and also shrunk the headphone’s carry case a bit, although it’s still not that compact. Those upgrades make the Aonic 50 Gen 2 a top noise-canceling headphone. The Aonic 50 Gen 2s are pretty heavy at 334 grams, they’re built sturdily and are also comfortable to wear, with nicely padded ear cups. They feature excellent sound quality with very good clarity and well-defined bass. Shure calls them a “studio headphone,” so the sound profile is fairly neutral, but you can add more bass in the EQ settings in Shure’s companion app for iOS and Android (engaging the Spatializer setting in the app expands the soundstage slightly but doesn’t make a big difference).

Bang & Olufsen’s Beoplay HX: Bang & Olufsen’s Beoplay HX headphones are the successor to the company’s H9 series headphones (the X is the Roman numeral for 10) and, like those earlier H9 models, the HX headphones carry a list price of $599 (some colors are discounted at Amazon). That price makes it a direct competitor of Apple’s AirPods Max, which is heavier at 385 grams versus the HX’s 285 grams. I don’t know if the HX headphones are more comfortable than the AirPods Max, but I found the two models pretty equal in the comfort department over longer listening sessions, and these do feature the usual swanky B&O lambskin-covered memory foam earpads. Their sound measures up well to the AirPods Max’s sound — overall, it’s well-balanced, with deep, well-defined bass, natural-sounding mids (where vocals live) and inviting detail in the treble.

V-Moda M-200: V-Moda’s M-200 is one of the few wired headphones on this list. Released in late 2019, these clean- and detailed-sounding over-ear headphones have excellent bass response, and the cushy earcups mean they’re also comfortable to wear. Featuring 50mm drivers with neodymium magnets, CCAW voice coils and fine-tuning by Roland engineers — yes, V-Moda is now owned by Roland — the M‑200 is Hi‑Res Audio-certified by the Japan Audio Society. Other V-Moda headphones tend to push the bass a little, but this set has the more neutral profile that you’d expect from studio monitor headphones. They come with two cords, one of which has a built-in microphone for making calls. It would be nice if V-Moda offered Lightning or USB-C cables for phones without headphone jacks. Note that last year V-Moda released the M-200 ANC ($350), a wireless version of these headphones that includes active noise canceling. They also sound great, but their noise cancellation, call quality and overall feature set don’t match those of the AirPods Max.

Mark Levinson No. 5909: These are premium audio brand Mark Levinson’s first headphones and, yes, they’re really expensive at $999. They’re also really good. They have a sturdy design without managing to feel hefty on your head (read: they’re substantial but not too heavy) and they’re comfortable to wear over long periods, thanks to their nicely padded and replaceable leather-covered earcups and headband. Read our Mark Levinson No. 5909 hands-on.

OneOdio A10: The OneOdio A10s deliver more than you’d expect for their relatively modest price, which is why they’re featured on several of our best lists. They’re built better than you think they would be for around $90 and are pretty comfortable to wear. They have a dual-hinge design and feel sturdy, weighing in at 395 grams, making them perfect headphones for a workout. They sound surprisingly decent and have reasonably good noise canceling with a transparency mode (which has a slight audible hiss). The headphones also have very good battery life. No, they’re not as comfortable as Bose’s and Sony’s models (they do feel a tad heavy) and their sound lacks that extra bit of clarity, bass definition and depth that more premium headphones tend to deliver. They did exceed my expectations and come with a decent carrying case, even if the OneOdio logo splayed across it is a bit garish. 

Technics EAH-A800: There’s a bit of an old-school vibe to the Technics EAH-A800 — and it’s not just the Technics brand, which Panasonic resurrected in the last few years. Their design is something of a throwback, but these headphones are comfortable and both fold up and fold flat. They feature a big, energetic sound with powerful bass and good detail, although they take a day or two to break in. 

I’ve done the heavy lifting this week to bring you a hand-picked selection of the best Netflix TV series that are actually worth your time. This weekend presents a fantastic opportunity to explore three exceptional hidden gems. Ranging from thoughtful animated comedies to eerie Nordic mysteries and tense crime dramas, these underrated Netflix TV series deliver original storytelling. So grab your favorite snacks and get ready to binge-watch.

We also have guides to the best new movies to stream, the best movies on Netflix, the best movies on Hulu, the best free movies, and the best movies on Amazon Prime Video.

Legends (2026)

Genre: Crime, Thriller, Drama
IMDb rating: 7.9/10
Rotten Tomatoes: 97%

Inspired by a true story, this gripping Netflix series is set in early 1990s Britain and follows an untrained team of ordinary customs officers. They get recruited into a top-secret operation, sent deep undercover into the country’s most dangerous drug gangs under entirely fabricated new identities known as legends.

The gritty tension builds beautifully from the very first episode as these normal civil servants struggle to survive in a volatile underworld while constantly risking exposure. This underrated TV series has outstanding lead performances, which capture the real people behind this story with striking authenticity. The dialogue is sharp and well written, and the show brilliantly captures the massive toll that living a double life takes on families and personal relationships.

You can watch Legends on Netflix.

Carol & The End of the World (2023)

Genre: Sci-Fi, Comedy, Drama
IMDb rating: 7.2/10
Rotten Tomatoes: 96%

Sometimes the end of the world makes for the most relatable story of all. With a mysterious planet hurtling toward Earth, humanity spends its final months chasing every wild indulgence it can find. While everyone else throws wild parties, one woman, named Carol, just wants a sense of normalcy before everything ends. She searches for a sense of ordinary routine by working a mundane office job inside a quiet corporate building.

The show perfectly balances existential dread with a comforting slice-of-life charm that makes the apocalypse feel strangely peaceful. I loved how it finds deep meaning in the quiet moments of everyday life rather than focusing on explosive destruction. The unique animation style and the brilliant dry humor make it an absolute standout comfort show.

You can watch Carol & The End of the World on Netflix.

Katla (2021)

Genre: Sci-Fi, Mystery, Drama
IMDb rating: 7.0/10
Rotten Tomatoes: 79%

Grief has a way of taking strange shapes, and this Icelandic mystery series shapes that idea into an unsettling story. The story of this underrated Netflix series begins one year after a massive volcanic eruption buries a small town in ash, when mysterious figures resembling people long thought dead start emerging from the glacier.

The haunting atmospheric tension grips you immediately, and the eerie Nordic scenery makes the unfolding mystery feel even more disorienting. This TV series uses Iceland’s bleak, icy landscape to build psychological dread that creeps you out. I also liked the deliberate slow-burn pacing that keeps you guessing about the true nature of the ash-covered visitors.

You can watch Katla on Netflix.

• Survey inds 69% of Americans support Bernie Sanders’ policy of requiring AI firms to transfer 50% of their stock to a public fund
• Respondents are also overwhelmingly in favor of giving the federal government the power to block new AI services deemed “risky”
• Support does appear to drop when Sanders’ name is mentioned

AI is developing an image problem, and respondents to a new survey have made their feelings clear: Bernie Sanders’ demand that AI firms contribute stock to a massive public fund is widely supported.

Conducted during June 2026 by the nonpartisan survey research company Verasight, the survey consisted of 17 questions sent to 1,690 adults (18 and above), finding over two-thirds (69%) supporting Sanders’ policy – a figure that only drops to 64% once it is revealed which politician the idea is associated with.

Intuit was an early pioneer in the usage of agentic AI, but its path to success has hardly been a straight line.

At VB Transform 2026, Intuit VP of AI Nhung Ho described how the company rebuilt its agent architecture twice in the span of about four months, first moving from a fleet of specialist agents to a central orchestration layer, then abandoning that layer for a skills and tools based system once the orchestrator itself started failing under its own complexity. The full second rebuild took 60 days, with a first working version in under 20.

The failure mode that forced the second rewrite was specific. Agents in the orchestrated system passed results to each other in natural language, and each handoff lost context the next agent needed to act correctly. 

“If you have 10 agents and they all are passing to each other, every time that pass happens, error compounds,” Ho said.

Why the orchestration layer broke down

Ho said the original push toward specialist agents came from a straightforward customer complaint. A fleet of capable agents is still something a customer has to manage, deciding which agent to use for which task. Intuit’s answer was a system that could take a task and route it internally, without asking the customer to pick an agent themselves.

That orchestration layer held up for about three months, which Ho described only half joking as roughly a year in the compressed timeline of agent development in 2026.

It broke for a structural reason rather than a capacity one. Passing outcomes between agents in natural language meant each downstream agent had to infer how the upstream agent reached its conclusion, and that inference degraded with each additional hop. A ten agent chain did not fail occasionally, it compounded errors by design.

That diagnosis is what sent Intuit back to a skills and tools architecture.

The 60-day rebuild, and what it took to get engineering buy-in

Rebuilding a production agent system in 60 days required more than an architectural decision. Ho said the harder problem was internal, convincing both leadership and the engineers who had built the original agents that scrapping recent work was the right call.

The pitch to leadership relied on evidence rather than argument. Ho’s team built a demo of the new architecture using real customer queries pulled from production, then showed it performing better than the existing system on the same tasks. 

“The best proof, at least my belief, is what are customers trying to do? And whatever system you build needs to address those problems,” Ho said.

Winning over engineering required a different case. Hundreds of engineers outside Ho’s core team had built the specialist agents being retired, and the ask was to take their agents apart into individual skills and tools instead. 

Ho said the motivating argument was scale. A standalone agent solved one narrow problem, while a shared skill or tool built into the new architecture could serve every customer who touched that part of the product. That shift also changed what partner teams were responsible for day to day, moving their focus from building agents to running evals, since evals became the only way to measure whether the new architecture was actually working.

Bringing a human into the loop, and feedback at a different scale

The clearest customer facing result of the rebuild is a feature that lets a live agent conversation pull in a human — though it’s currently in early testing, live to about 1% of Intuit’s customer base. “We’re going to be scaling it up in the next few weeks,” she said.

Ho said a customer can bring in an Intuit product support person mid conversation, or their own accountant, or one of Intuit’s own bookkeepers, and that person joins with the full context of what the agent has already done.

Ho drew a direct contrast with how most AI chat products handle the same situation. A general purpose assistant answering a tax question typically ends with a disclaimer to consult a professional. Intuit’s system is built to connect the customer to that professional directly, inside the same conversation.

That human handoff sits alongside a permissions model built for financial data specifically. Every action an agent takes on a customer’s financial data requires explicit permission first, though Ho said that requirement can ease over time as customers build trust in the system. Intuit keeps an audit log of everything an agent does that can be reversed if needed.

Feedback in the agentic AI era

The rebuild also changed how Intuit gathers and uses feedback, a shift Ho said is qualitatively different from what came before. 

“Feedback in the past used to be very, very sparse, and it was also very bimodal,” Ho said. “Either they loved it or they hated it, and usually it tends towards the negative.”

In a chat based system, every conversation functions as feedback, which Ho said moved the company from roughly 0.3% of customers ever giving explicit feedback to something close to 100%.

Ho said she has returned to writing code herself specifically to build models that analyze that feedback volume systematically, looking for where the system is falling short at a scale no manual review process could keep up with.

That volume comes with a tone most product teams aren’t used to hearing directly. Customers tell the agent exactly where it failed, in plain terms.

“They straight up tell you, ‘You suck. I hate this. This is not right,’” Ho said. “But they’re also willing to give the systems grace and correct it as well, and so the onus is on all of us to harvest this new piece of feedback and type of feedback, and actually improve the system.”

Why it matters: Display enthusiasts have anticipated the emergence of inkjet-printed (IJP) OLED panels in consumer products since TCL subsidiary TCL-CSOT began promoting them in 2024. The technology aims to improve OLED in numerous ways while also making the traditionally expensive displays more affordable, which could make them suitable for a wider range of devices.

Lenovo’s R9000P laptop, the world’s first to feature an IJP OLED screen, is now available in China, starting at around $1,300. It remains unclear when the laptop or any other IJP OLED model might appear globally, but the device raises hopes that the technology will soon lead to cheaper OLED notebooks.

According to TCL-CSOT, the IJP manufacturing process increases OLED brightness by doubling the luminescent material utilization rate to 90% and halving blue-light loss. Furthermore, using more durable materials and a higher aperture ratio significantly extends a panel’s lifespan.

IJP, which involves large, precise inkjet printers, is actually already used in much of the traditional OLED production process, such as encapsulation layer deposition and depositing quantum dots in Samsung QD-OLED panels. TCL extended the technique to emitters and other stack materials, shortening manufacturing time by 30%, lowering costs by 20%, and reducing power consumption. The company also highlights sidestepping the need for high-precision fine metal masks as a major cost-cutter.

TCL debuted IJP OLED in a 65-inch 8K 120Hz curved monitor with an 1800R curve a few years ago. Mass production using the technology began with a 21.6-inch 4K monitor for medical professionals.

IJP’s emergence in Lenovo’s new laptop points toward a future where OLED becomes more common. The R9000P’s panel supports a 2560 x 1600-pixel resolution with a 240Hz refresh rate, 100% DCI-P3 color gamut, a 3ms response time, and 500 nits of brightness.

Marketed as a multi-purpose laptop, it could make for a modest gaming machine, with a mobile RTX 4060 graphics card packing 8GB of VRAM and support for AMD FreeSync along with Nvidia G-Sync. The CPU is a 16-core AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, and the only storage option is a 1TB PCIe 4.0 SSD. While the notebook includes DDR5-5600 RAM, Lenovo pegged its minimum operating frequency at 5,200 MT/s.

OLED panels may also emerge in other relatively low-cost products in the coming months. Apple is expected to unveil the first OLED iPad mini later this year, followed by a new iPad Air early next year. Chinese resale listings have also intensified rumors that the Nintendo Switch 2 might soon receive an OLED variant.

Apple’s affordable MacBook Neo could soon become much harder to buy.

The company has significantly reduced production plans for the laptop, not because demand has cooled, but because ongoing memory shortages are putting pressure on chip supplies.

According to DigiTimes, Apple has cut its production target for the MacBook Neo by up to 40%. This lowers expected output from around 10 million units to between six and seven million by the end of the year.

The move is notable given how well the laptop has reportedly performed since launch. Earlier reports suggested the MacBook Neo had boosted Apple’s overall Mac sales by around 10%. Strong demand for its lower price point has made it one of the company’s biggest hardware successes of the year.

Singapore brands used to thrive in China. Today, they’re fighting to survive.

For about two decades, a Singapore brand in a Chinese shopping mall exuded “quality,” “hygiene,” “trustworthy”—a halo effect so strong that brands like BreadTalk, Jumbo Seafood, Toast Box and Food Republic could set up premium real estate in Beijing, Shanghai and Chengdu and watch the country’s rising middle class come to them as it rode the wave of China’s consumption upgrade.

However, the appeal of “Singapore quality” has since faded, and that golden era is over.

Food Republic closed its last Beijing outlet on Jun 15, 2026. Its parent company, BreadTalk, had already exited the capital completely at the end of Mar, down from 460 China outlets at its peak to roughly 200 today.

Jumbo Seafood is planning to close its outlets across China and consolidate its operations in Shanghai. Song Fa Bak Kut Teh has already made a similar move, having exited other Chinese cities; its sole remaining outlet in the country is also located in Shanghai.

Evidently, the Singapore F&B retreat from China is not just a single brand’s failure, but rather a structural reckoning, and the story of what comes next is only beginning.

The golden age for Singapore brands in China

In the early 2000s, “Singapore quality” was seen as a genuine competitive advantage in China.

As Chinese incomes rose and the middle class expanded, there was a real appetite for international dining experiences that felt premium yet accessible. 

Singapore’s hawker heritage, such as bak kut teh, chilli crab, kaya toast, offered the Chinese middle-class familiar Asian flavours with an international pedigree.

BreadTalk was a pioneer amongst Singapore businesses in overseas expansion to China. Founded in Singapore in 2000 by George Quek, the group grew to nearly 1,000 outlets across 17 countries at its peak, with China as its largest market.

Jumbo claimed to serve 1.6 tonnes of crab per day at its three Shanghai outlets in 2017. Song Fa, Putien, Paradise Group, and Toast Box all expanded into first-tier cities like Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen, and, buoyed by success, pushed further into second-tier cities like Chengdu, Hangzhou, and Nanjing.

For about two decades, the aura of “Singapore quality” worked in China—until around 2023.

What broke the spell

The turning point was not just one event but several overlapping shifts that fundamentally changed what Chinese consumers want and who they are willing to pay for.

Firstly, consumer spending has contracted greatly over the years. China’s property market downturn eroded middle-class wealth, while youth unemployment hit record highs in 2023. As such, the aspirational spending that once fuelled premium dining retreated sharply. 

Those with more wealth also weren’t spending as much as they used to. Jumbo Group CEO Ang Kiam Meng told Lianhe Zaobao that consumer confidence is the main issue and that the CCP’s “eight-point regulations” limiting corporate entertainment spending had hit the entire mid-to-high-end F&B environment hard.

The Jumbo Group financials show that out of the total revenue of S$178.8 million in 2023, China’s revenue was S$26.1 million, but it dropped by a whopping 27.6% to S$18.9 million in FY2024 and S$18.3 million in FY2025.

Secondly, it’s important to acknowledge that local Chinese brands have become formidable world-class competitors. While Singapore operators were managing existing outlets, Chinese competitors were investing in R&D and digital marketing, building social media presences on Douyin, and getting onto food delivery platforms like Meituan with aggressive discounts, building loyal followings online and physically that Singapore brands struggled to match.

Putien’s general manager for China, Ling Ling Kong, observed that market traffic is now increasingly concentrated among leading Internet-famous brands, making it harder for traditional quality restaurants to attract new customers. 

BreadTalk’s own spokesperson acknowledged that the rapid rise of Chinese brands, coupled with the growing importance of food delivery and e-commerce platforms, has reshaped the entire competitive landscape. 

Underlying all of this was the fading of the Singapore premium itself. Jianggan Li, CEO of consultancy Momentum Works, explained that “the place of origin of overseas brands, including Singapore’s, has shifted from a competitive advantage to mere background information.” 

Chinese consumers today care about product quality, whether prices are reasonable, and whether the experience is worth sharing online. A brand being from Singapore no longer moves the needle the way it once did.

As such, with the added pressures of high rents in core commercial districts and the cost of high-quality ingredients, shrinking profit margins have increasingly become a reality for the entire industry, including Singaporean businesses. 

China is not the endgame

Since around 2023, most Singapore brands have been quietly consolidating—and by now, Shanghai has become the last viable city for almost all of them, but even there, the competitive environment is brutal.

BreadTalk took the deepest cut, contracting from 460 China outlets to roughly 200 while Food Republic retains four remaining Shanghai outlets, and pivoted to a new avenue of growth in operating canteens for schools and companies. The group’s sights are now firmly set on a S$1 billion revenue target by 2029, built on its Singapore and Thailand bakeries and its Din Tai Fung franchise rights.

BreadTalk still operates across 14 international markets.

Jumbo is making a similar pivot, foreseeing the closure of six restaurants in six Chinese cities to focus on Shanghai while betting on a different kind of growth at home: a new S$10 million Tai Seng headquarters with a dedicated catering kitchen and a new subsidiary, Jumbo Catering Services, with Jakarta and Ho Chi Minh City next on the list.

On the other hand, Jumbo still has outlets in South Korea, Thailand, and Cambodia, maintaining its overseas footprint to comprise more than just China.

These overseas expansions operate on the logic that Asian markets offer growing middle classes, cultural familiarity with Singaporean food, and less savage competition than in China.

Song Fa, meanwhile, has drawn a quiet line under its China ambitions entirely, condensing to just a single Shanghai outlet while refocusing on Singapore and tourist-facing spots like Jewel Changi Airport.

Of all these retreats, Putien is an outlier, holding on. By capping its China presence at 20 to 30 outlets from the start and holding 27 today, it never overextended, and that discipline now looks like it’s paying off as it never badly exposed the company in the first place.

What’s striking is that none of these is failing companies.

Jumbo’s first-half 2025 revenue grew 7.9% to S$105 million, driven by Singapore operations, while BreadTalk hit nearly S$600 million in 2023 revenue.  They are companies recalibrating, rather than collapsing, shedding China exposure that was diluting returns and doubling down on markets where they still have genuine advantages.

The harder question is what happens when those alternatives face the same pressures.

China is now coming here

As Singapore’s F&B brands retreat from China, Chinese F&B brands are also flooding into Singapore at an unprecedented pace.

About 85 Chinese F&B brands were operating approximately 405 outlets in Singapore as of Aug 2025, more than double the 32 brands running 184 outlets just a year earlier, according to data from Inside Retail. 

Chagee, Mixue, Tai Er, Nong Geng Ji — brands Singaporeans now see in every major mall — are using Singapore as a launchpad to greater expansion, leveraging the city’s regulatory clarity, international reputation, and diverse consumer base to validate their concepts before moving into broader Southeast Asia.

There’s a temptation to frame this as China got hard, so Singapore’s F&Bs are coming home. But home isn’t a soft landing either. 

Singapore’s F&B sector recorded over 3,000 outlet closures in 2024—the highest in almost two decades—and closures continued at roughly 300 every month through 2025.

The format that’s struggling in China is also struggling in Singapore.

This exposes a much bleaker read of Singapore businesses than a simple East-versus-West business environment contrast, and it raises the question of where these companies can expect growth to come if they’re to continue in their old ways in the seemingly foreign retail landscape back at home.

The dynamic is a direct inversion of what happened in China a decade ago, where Singapore brands rode the wave of China’s consumption upgrade.

Now, Chinese brands are riding Singapore’s position as Southeast Asia’s gateway city and bringing the capital backing, digital marketing muscle, and operational scale that Singapore brands found themselves lacking when competing in China.

The lesson in the retreat

Momentum Works’ Li felt that Singapore brands’ retreating from China aren’t necessarily poor brands, but rather brands that were once successful but failed to keep pace with the speed of change in the Chinese market. 

China’s market has never lacked opportunities, but it is simply changing too quickly. Many Singapore brands entered, attempting to solve the needs of consumers a decade ago, and found themselves stranded when those needs shifted.

A restaurateur who has operated a Singaporean restaurant in Beijing for 14 years noted that Singapore companies were not aggressive enough in capturing market share, were underinvested in their frontline teams, and were too slow to embrace digital marketing.

What they lost in China was not just outlets, but also the assumption that being Singaporean was enough. 

As Li advices: “Singapore brands that can continue to survive in China would either have to offer Singaporean characteristics and experiences that other Chinese brands cannot replace, or fully localise themselves.”

• Read other articles we’ve written on Singaporean businesses here.

Also Read: ⁠The price of going regional: Raffles Medical’s S$600M bet is still struggling to pay off

Featured Image Credit: Jumbo Seafood, JonasCN via Tripadvisor

Investor interest in these IPOs comes amid growing concerns over whether hyperscalers, whose shares have soared in recent years, will be able to convert their huge spending into profits. Many traders are instead starting to look at smaller companies or those in other sectors that are likely to benefit from this wave of investment.

Fervo chief executive Tim Latimer says the company and its investors view public markets as a way to grow quicker. Fervo raised more than $2bn when it went public in May.

Credit:
Michael Nagle/Bloomberg

Advertisement

However, despite the surging demand for energy and the strong interest in the IPOs, there are signs that investors are buying into hot stocks at flotation, only to sell out shortly afterwards.

Nearly two-thirds of the energy companies that floated this year and last are now trading below their offer price, according to Dealogic. That compares with less than 40 percent of IPOs across all sectors that are underwater.

X-energy, which develops small modular nuclear reactors and is backed by Amazon, came to market in April and is now trading 33 percent below its $23 offer price. ERock, a gas generator maker, has lost 42 percent of its value since its IPO in June, while Fermi, a data center energy company, is down 68 percent since coming to market in September.

Deep Fission, which is designing nuclear reactors to be buried in one-mile underground holes, raised $40 million in June, a 73 percent cut from its initial target. The company’s shares are down 33 percent from its Wall Street debut.

Brian Kessens, senior portfolio manager at energy-focused fund firm Tortoise Capital, said some traders are buying into IPOs then selling quickly and “rolling into the next one.”

Investment banks need to make sure they’re setting “reasonable valuations” and be more careful about selling shares to investors who are likely to flip fast, he added.

“If you think that an IPO is going to go really well, then it’s in some sense free money,” said RBC’s Dendrinos.

Some companies, like X-energy and Deep Fission, are developing technologies that critics say are not yet proven to be technically or commercially viable.

Often those faring better have “a real business now,” said Jeff Osborne, a sustainability and energy transition analyst at TD Cowen, and are “less of a science experiment.”

Additional reporting by George Steer. Data visualisation by Nolan Shaffer

© 2025 The Financial Times Ltd. All rights reserved. Not to be redistributed, copied, or modified in any way.

The iPhone maker has accused OpenAI of stealing hardware secrets via its former employees.

Apple has reportedly contacted around 40 of its former employees who now work for OpenAI, as it looks to gather evidence of alleged trade secrets theft by the AI juggernaut.

The iPhone maker launched a major lawsuit against OpenAI last week, accusing the company stealing hardware secrets from Apple via its former employees to develop its own line of devices.

Reports of OpenAI’s upcoming AI-powered smart speaker surfaced just days later. Sources told Bloomberg that the new device is designed to be a next-generation, ChatGPT-powered home computer – meant to be a physical embodiment of the AI chatbot.

In legal letters, Apple directed its ex-employees at OpenAI to collect and preserve certain documents. More than 400 former Apple workers are now employed at OpenAI.

In its lawsuit, Apple accused OpenAI of a “coordinated pattern of misconduct at an institutional level”, alleging that the AI start-up instructed potential job candidates from Apple to bring design artefacts and prototypes to their interviews.

The lawsuit levelled accusations against two former Apple employees, including Io co-founder Tang Yew Tan, who currently serves as OpenAI’s chief hardware officer.

According to Apple, Tan had been “methodically using Apple’s confidential information to benefit OpenAI”. He has been accused of directing job candidates still working at Apple to bring confidential physical parts from products under development for ‘show and tell’ sessions at OpenAI.

Tan co-founded Io alongside Apple design veteran Jony Ive, Scott Cannon and Evans Hankey in 2024, and led the line as its chief hardware officer. The hardware start-up was acquired by OpenAI for $6.5bn last year.

OpenAI already owned around 23pc of Io prior to the acquisition. Bloomberg reported that tensions between the companies worsened after OpenAI poached Ive to help with its product line.

Apple has been working on its AI offerings in hopes of catching up with its industry rivals. Earlier this year, reports emerged that suggested Apple was set to move away from ChatGPT exclusivity for its Siri voice assistant. The company was also reportedly developing three AI-infused wearables, including smart glasses, earlier this year.

Last month, it launched Siri AI, marketed as an “entirely new version of Siri”. The new AI agent can draw from messages, emails, photos and more from Apple devices to power new features across editing, communication and organisation.

The iPhone maker is also reportedly on the lookout to acquire AI chip companies in a bid to reduce its dependency on Nvidia. Meanwhile, it recently renewed its deal with Broadcom for custom-made chips through to 2031.

Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.