The 14th generation of Lenovo’s flagship business ultraportable, the X1 Carbon, looks no different than the previous iteration. But don’t let its comfortingly familiar design fool you: The interior has been completely reengineered to make the laptop run more coolly and quietly, and — more importantly — it’s easier to repair.
The X1 Carbon Gen 14 introduces Lenovo’s Space Frame chassis that features a smaller motherboard and larger cooling fans, along with a modular design that makes it easier to access and then repair or replace individual components. This is good news for ThinkPad buyers who care about ROI, sustainability or both.
The laptop is based on Intel’s Core Ultra 300 series processors, known as Panther Lake. If you were hoping for a big leap in performance from last year’s Lunar Lake model, you’ll need to keep waiting in the hopes that next year’s Gen 15 delivers the goods. This year’s model isn’t any faster than last year’s ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13, and battery life is actually a few hours shorter.
Advertisement
Performance certainly suffices for basic office tasks, and you should be able to get through even the longest workdays on a single charge, but the reason to pick up the X1 Carbon Gen 14 is the increased repairability rather than anything resembling an increase in performance. Two other reasons for it: the X1 Carbon’s traditional look remains largely unchanged, which will delight longtime ThinkPad fans; and pricing hasn’t gone up (the model Lenovo sent me is actually $100 cheaper than the similar config I tested last year). That will come as a relief to any laptop buyer in this era of RAMageddon and skyrocketing prices for laptops, phones and other electronics.
Lenovo has kept pricing fairly consistent for this year’s ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14, which ought to be applauded as laptop prices keep going up and up. As Lenovo’s flagship ThinkPad, however, the X1 Carbon remains a device more likely to be toted around by C-suite execs than the rank and file. The entry point has risen, but the cost of upgrades has surprisingly dropped a bit. And despite what Lenovo may show on its site, there is a way to get the ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 for less than $2,000.
Advertisement
Lenovo lists a starting price of $2,139 for a config with an Intel Core Ultra 5 335, 32GB of RAM, a 256GB solid-state drive, a 1,920×1,200-pixel IPS display and Windows 11 Home. But if you choose to upgrade to the Core Ultra 7 355, then you can downgrade the RAM to 16GB for a price of $1,884. I’m not suggesting you move off of the 32GB of RAM offered, but simply highlighting it as a somewhat hidden option.
Matt Elliott/CNET
Less hidden, and new with this year’s Panther Lake-based X1 Carbon, is the option to expand the memory to 64GB. When you choose the top CPU offered, the Core Ultra 7 365, the option for 64GB becomes available. That’s the good news. The bad news is that this memory upgrade is staggeringly expensive. It costs $720 and clearly shows how the global RAM shortage has dramatically increased PC component pricing.
My test system features the Core Ultra 7 355 chip and 32GB of RAM, along with three other upgrades: a 512GB SSD, a 2.8K nontouch OLED display and Windows 11 Pro, which raises the total to $2,374. That’s actually $100 cheaper than the X1 Carbon Gen 13 that I reviewed last year, which had the same component lineup but with the previous-gen Core Ultra 7 258V CPU.
The Space Frame design completely overhauls the laptop’s interior layout, making it easier to repair or replace individual components rather than replacing the entire laptop if one part fails. It’s not as modular and easy to access as I had hoped, but it’s certainly a step in the right (-to-repair) direction.
You need only to remove four screws to take off the bottom panel. Inside, the battery is held in place by three screws, and you’ll need to remove it to get to the internal frame that houses the double-sided motherboard.
Matt Elliott/CNET
In addition to removing the bottom panel, you can remove the keyboard deck to access each side of the motherboard. Six screws hold the keyboard deck in place. So, that’s a total of 13 screws to gain full access to the interior components. And they are all standard Phillips screws, so you won’t need to hunt around for a Torx or Pentalobe screwdriver. (They’re captive screws, too, so you won’t have a chance to lose any.)
In truth, taking off the two panels is slightly more complicated than removing 13 screws. There are four ribbon cables you also need to disconnect, which might make people in your organization less confident to make their own repairs and more likely to call the IT department. I also found it challenging to get all the cables on the right side of the internal frame as I attempted to line up the keyboard deck and snap it into place when I was reassembling the laptop.
Advertisement
Matt Elliott/CNET
Even if Lenovo’s Space Frame chassis is a bit trickier and not as modular as, say, a Framework laptop, it makes the X1 Carbon Gen 14 much more repairable than any previous ThinkPad. For starters, you can replace the battery, which often is the first component to show signs of age and wear as battery life slowly but ever-so-consistently shortens. Most of today’s laptops have batteries that are soldered to the motherboard and not replaceable, so being able to just swap in a new battery is a boon.
In addition, the laptop’s cooling fans, keyboard, speakers and the USB ports are user-replaceable. The two USB-C ports on the left side can be individually removed and replaced, but the pair on the right is a packaged set.
Matt Elliott/CNET
The USB-C and -A ports on the right side are paired on a small circuit board that’s separate from the mainboard, so you’d need to replace both ports should one fail. Still, it’s nice that this small board can be replaced rather than needing to swap out the mainboard, which usually equates to a full laptop replacement.
Advertisement
Matt Elliott/CNET
The X1 Carbon Gen 14’s SSD is replaceable, but it occupies the lone M.2 slot, so you’ll need to replace the existing drive, and you don’t have the luxury of simply adding a second SSD to increase the storage capacity. The RAM is not user-replaceable, so you have to get what you need upfront.
Same X1 Carbon exterior
The interior has been completely redesigned, but the exterior received only minor tweaks. The latest ThinkPad X1 Carbon retains the classic ThinkPad look. It’s boxy, matte black with the familiar red accents. And it’s still exceptionally light at just under 2.2 pounds.
The keyboard received a couple of cosmetic changes. Lenovo moved the fingerprint reader, integrating it with the power button in the top-right corner. This change restores the right-Ctrl key but also means the End and Insert keys are now double-mapped to a single key. Lenovo also shifted the keyboard icons from their usual spot in the top-left corner of each key to the center, a move that also includes a slight tweak to the font.
Matt Elliott/CNET
The keyboard maintains its ThinkPad standard of excellence. It sits in the sweet spot of offering plush but firm feedback and is still the standard-bearer for laptop keyboards. It’s a pleasure to type on.
You have a choice of touchpads: mechanical or haptic. I received the mechanical one, and it’s fine for what it is. There is some diving-board effect where clicks are harder to perform as you move up the touchpad’s surface. Given that there’s no upcharge for the haptic touchpad, I think most people are better off with it because it offers a consistent click response across its entire surface.
Advertisement
Matt Elliott/CNET
The haptic touchpad also provides a larger surface on which to click and swipe because it integrates the mouse buttons for the pointing stick into a narrow strip at the top. The only reason I see for the mechanical touchpad is if you favor the traditional ThinkPad pointing stick over the touchpad and want the larger mouse buttons for it at the top of the touchpad.
The 2.8K OLED display is excellent and, shockingly, doesn’t cost any more than the baseline IPS panel. That’s the reason why the Gen 14 model I have is $100 less than the nearly identical Gen 13 model I looked at last year. Component prices have gone up, but Lenovo not charging $490 for the OLED upgrade certainly helps keep the price in check.
Matt Elliott/CNET
The OLED looks fantastic, with vivid colors, deep blacks and crisp images and text. Scrolling and other movements on the screen look smooth, thanks to its variable refresh rate of 30Hz to 120Hz. Color coverage is excellent with 100% coverage of the sRGB and P3 gamuts, and it proved to be even a bit brighter than its 500-nit rating, hitting a peak of 510 nits on my tests with a Spyder X Elite colorimeter.
The ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 offers a Windows Hello webcam along with the aforementioned fingerprint scanner. I like getting both types of biometrics, especially on a business machine.
Advertisement
Matt Elliott/CNET
The port selection has grown by one with this year’s X1 Carbon. It picked up an extra USB-C Thunderbolt 4 to bring the count to three. And, better yet, it’s located on the opposite side of the other two, giving you the ability to charge the laptop from either side.
Quick note on the Aura Edition suffix: It’s the branding for Lenovo and Intel’s partnership that makes it easier to swap files between the X1 Carbon and your phone. Less useful are its smart modes for setting a timer to focus or a wellness mode that reminds you to take a break to rest your eyes. There’s even a mildly unsettling posture warning that uses the webcam to track how you’re doing at sitting up straight and not slouching in front of the laptop.
ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 performance
This year’s Panther Lake model isn’t any faster than last year’s Lunar Lake system. Multicore performance crept up a smidgeon, but single-core performance slid back. Meanwhile, 3D performance also decreased, which isn’t surprising when you consider that the Core Ultra 7 355’s integrated GPU has only four Xe graphics cores, and last year’s Core Ultra 7 258V’s iGPU had eight Xe cores. Lenovo doesn’t offer a Core Ultra X7 that brings with it Intel’s higher-powered, 12-core Arc B390 integrated GPU, which is unfortunate for creators or other power users eyeing the X1 Carbon Gen 14.
I also wasn’t surprised to see battery life move three hours in the wrong direction. The Core Ultra 7 355 is a higher-wattage CPU than the Core Ultra 7 258V and, therefore, consumes battery resources at a quicker clip. The X1 Carbon Gen 13 lasted nearly 18 hours on our YouTube streaming battery drain test, and the X1 Carbon Gen 14 lasted almost 15 hours on the same test. That’s still enough to get you through most workdays on a single charge, but it doesn’t give you as much leeway as last year.
Advertisement
Should I buy the ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14?
Outweighing the lack of any performance gains with this year’s edition and battery life decreasing by a few hours is the greater repairability that should help extend the useful life of the ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14. The Space Frame design makes it possible to repair or replace the battery when it starts to fade, a cranky cooling fan or a bad port instead of needing to junk the laptop and buy a new one. That’s great for your ROI and the environment.
I also like two things about the X1 Carbon that didn’t change this year. First, I appreciate that in year 14, the X1 Carbon continues to stay true to its roots and keeps its traditional look and feel. It’s just a well-built machine with a rare combination of being very lightweight yet sturdy (and the keyboard is *chef’s kiss*). Secondly, I was pleasantly surprised to see pricing stay steady. Lenovo raised the entry price, but that is more than offset by removing the premium for the OLED upgrade. And since I imagine most people buying the flagship ThinkPad will want the best display offered, you’ll come out ahead on the price compared to last year’s X1 Carbon.
Advertisement
The review process for laptops, desktops, tablets and other computerlike devices consists of two parts: performance testing under controlled conditions in the CNET Labs and extensive hands-on use by our expert reviewers. This includes evaluating a device’s aesthetics, ergonomics and features. A final review verdict is a combination of both objective and subjective judgments.
A more detailed description of each benchmark and how we use it can be found on our How We Test Computers page.
Geekbench 6 CPU (multicore)
Advertisement
Microsoft Surface Laptop for Business (8th Edition)17014Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 Aura Edition11492Acer Swift Go 14 AI11490Dell XPS 1411207Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 Aura Edition11079HP EliteBook Ultra G1i11032
Note: Longer bars indicate better performance
Geekbench 6 CPU (single-core)
Microsoft Surface Laptop for Business (8th Edition)2953HP EliteBook Ultra G1i2777Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 Aura Edition2742Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 Aura Edition2679Dell XPS 142599Acer Swift Go 14 AI2422
Note: Longer bars indicate better performance
Cinebench 2024 CPU (multicore)
Advertisement
Microsoft Surface Laptop for Business (8th Edition)802Acer Swift Go 14 AI709Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 Aura Edition647Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 Aura Edition557Dell XPS 14530HP EliteBook Ultra G1i518
Note: Longer bars indicate better performance
Cinebench 2024 CPU (single-core)
Microsoft Surface Laptop for Business (8th Edition)125HP EliteBook Ultra G1i123Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 Aura Edition121Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 Aura Edition119Dell XPS 14117Acer Swift Go 14 AI107
Note: Longer bars indicate better performance
3DMark Steel Nomad
Advertisement
Microsoft Surface Laptop for Business (8th Edition)1387HP EliteBook Ultra G1i820Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 Aura Edition680Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 Aura Edition619Dell XPS 14524Acer Swift Go 14 AI233
Note: Longer bars indicate better performance
PCMark 10 Pro Edition
Microsoft Surface Laptop for Business (8th Edition)9432Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 Aura Edition7734Dell XPS 147467Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 Aura Edition7114HP EliteBook Ultra G1i6815
Note: Longer bars indicate better performance
Online streaming battery drain test
Advertisement
Acer Swift Go 14 AI23 hr, 13 minDell XPS 1421 hr, 7 minLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 Aura Edition17 hr, 54 minLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 Aura Edition14 hr, 49 minMicrosoft Surface Laptop for Business (8th Edition)14 hr, 42 minHP EliteBook Ultra G1i13 hr, 39 min
Note: Longer bars indicate better performance
System configurations
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 Aura Edition
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro; Intel Core Ultra 7 355; 32GB DDR5 RAM; Intel Arc 140V Graphics; 512GB SSD
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 Aura Edition
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro; Intel Core Ultra 7 258V; 32GB DDR5 RAM; Intel Arc 140V Graphics; 512GB SSD
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro; Intel Core Ultra 7 268V; 32GB DDR5 RAM; Intel Arc 140V Graphics; 512GB SSD
Microsoft Surface Laptop for Business (8th Edition)
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro; Intel Core Ultra X7 368H; 32GB DDR5 RAM; Intel Arc B390 Graphics; 1TB SSD
Dell XPS 14
Microsoft Windows 11 Home; Intel Core Ultra 7 355; 16GB DDR5 RAM; Intel Graphics; 512GB SSD
Acer Swift Go 14 AI
Microsoft Windows 11 Home; Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100; 16GB DDR5 RAM; Qualcomm Adreno Graphics; 1TB SSD
Brendan Carr and the Trump FCC are finalizing plans to illegally eliminate what’s left of the country’s already barely functional media consolidation limits; a specific gift to Trump-friendly right wing broadcasters that are hoping to monopolize what’s left of local U.S. broadcast news so they can more efficiently spread propaganda and kiss the president’s ass.
Current laws (remember those?) prohibit any single local broadcast news company from serving more than 39 percent of all TV households in the US. The original (good) idea was that this helped protect opinion diversity and competition in the local broadcast news space. Republicans don’t like that, because they want to replace all journalism with right-wing and oligarch friendly propaganda.
Brendan Carr last March had already made it clear he viewed the law as optional when he granted Nexstar Media Group a waiver for its $6.2 billion acquisition of Tegna. That deal would let the company reach more than half of all U.S. households with what passes as “local news.” Now he’s trying to replace a congressionally-approved law with a “case by case review” dictated by Republican whims:
“Carr now plans to repeal the 39 percent limit and replace it with a “case-by-case review” of each proposed merger, the chairman announced today in an op-ed published on Breitbart. The change would make it easier for the FCC to pick and choose which station groups get to surpass the limit. Under Carr, this would likely benefit news companies that provide favorable coverage for President Trump.”
This is, to be clear, illegal. Something the FCC’s lone Democrat, Anna Gomez, made clear in her own statement:
Advertisement
“This unlawful effort to hand control of the public airwaves to billionaire buddies of this administration will destroy local newsrooms, silence community reporting, and drive-up costs for the American families who depend on local stations for news and emergency alerts. A free and diverse media landscape depends on real limits on how much of the public airwaves any one company can control, and this FCC is now poised to allow local broadcasters to sell those airwaves off to the highest bidder. Congress set the 39 percent national ownership cap in federal law, and only Congress has the authority to raise or eliminate it. The Commission cannot waive away that limit simply because these corporate behemoths want to get out from under it.”
Clearly there will be lawsuits, though they’re likely to drag on until long after Nexstar and Tegna have merged, with future regulators being very unlikely to unwind the transaction. I’d then expect to see Sinclair Broadcasting to merge with the remaining company, creating a monopoly over local broadcast TV.
While people are quick to insist that “who cares, nobody watches this stuff,” they don’t seem to realize that somewhere around 80 million households still watch local broadcast TV channels via antenna, cable TV, streaming providers, or satellite.
As I’ve frequently discussed, most of these local broadcasters deliver a sloppy combination of lazy infotainment and right-wing agitprop, as that viral video about Sinclair Broadcasting made clear a few years back:
Advertisement
Carr’s very unsubtle goal here is to turn the entirety of U.S. local broadcast television into propaganda arms of the U.S. right wing. That’s not an opinion or hyperbole, and he’s well on his way already. It might help if there was a functional opposition party that had made meaningful media reforms a centerpiece of their political platform anytime in the last quarter century.
And this is, of course, just local broadcast TV. We’ve also got Carr’s FCC helping Larry Ellison do the same thing to CBS and CNN. Ellison’s also steadily doing the same thing to TikTok while Elon Musk does the same thing to what used to be Twitter. If you stand back, tilt you head, and squint just right, you might begin to notice a consistent theme.
These days, it is easy to think you always have access to the Internet. But some wonder if — in spite of its ARPANET, nuclear-war-planning heritage — you can actually count on it to be there when things go pear-shaped. [The Tech Prepper], as you might imagine, is quite concerned with that last question, and is flogging Reticulum over high-frequency radio as a post-internet network in a video embedded below.
Reticulum is a cryptographic network stack, fully decentralized and amazing from a cyberpunk/hacker/survivalist perspective. Unfortunately for [The Tech Prepper], until the you-know-what hits the ventilation unit and the FCC and its counterparts in other countries are too busy to be concerned with such trifles, encrypted signals are banned on ham radio bands just about everywhere. That’s why his demo is using a dummy load on the Mercury HF modem instead of an antenna: the feds don’t care if the signal doesn’t leave the building. The video shows how to replicate the setup using his EmComm Tools suite on Ubuntu.
Perhaps more interesting is his vision of a Post-Internet network, be it in a disaster scenario, as he envisions, or simply because we get sick of what the internet has become. The idea of easily hooking an open-source radio modem to a PC running modem73, open-source SDR software, has a certain appeal. Reticulum isn’t your only option there: modem73 will let you run a BBS in the clear — that is, unencrypted and legal to transmit — and let’s face it, wasn’t life online more fun in BBS days?
Advertisement
This isn’t the first time we’ve seen the Reticulum network stack, but last time it was operating at considerably shorter ranges over LoRA.
Finding another planet outside of our solar system that can comfortably be called ‘Earth-like’ is one of those discoveries that — if confirmed — would be a major event. The complication here is that with every exoplanet that we discover through observations, determining the type of planet is hard enough, never mind figuring out whether it has an atmosphere, much less what’s in that atmosphere. This makes a recent report on LHS 1140 b rather exciting, as it strongly suggests that this super-Earth may have something close to an Earth-like atmosphere.
In the paper by [Collin Cherubim] and others in Science, the findings of helium occasionally escaping from its atmosphere have led to considerable excitement, as this time-variable atmospheric escape of helium suggests a helium-rich upper atmosphere that’s further depleted in hydrogen.
It should be noted, of course, that these assumptions are based on observations from roughly 49 light-years away, so there’s always some room for later adjustments. Even if confirmed, the star that LHS 1140b orbits is a red dwarf, with a nearly 25-day orbital period and light levels less than half of what Earth receives from the Sun. This would make the surface of LHS 1140b with its proposed oceans rather dim, even if it’s conceivably at temperatures well within the comfort range of us Earth-based mammals.
Advertisement
At 49 light-years distance, it’s also not close enough that — barring an FTL drive — we could do direct observations or visitations, but if these results hold, it’d be on the short list along with a number of other plausibly habitable exoplanets to check out once we build that first warp drive-powered starship.
Research from ServiceNow indicates an 18-point gap between AI strategy and execution in EMEA.
Despite massive artificial intelligence spending, European businesses are struggling to turn their investments into measurable results, a new ServiceNow index has found.
Organisations across Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMEA) scored 51 out of 100 for their overall AI maturity – up 34pc since last year – but only managed to hit 40 points when it comes to actual AI-enabled workflows.
Leadership, vision and strategy scores reached 58, according to the report, which surveyed more than 4,700 senior executives across 16 countries. 1,700 were based across EMEA.
Advertisement
Business are paying for AI capability that they haven’t yet unlocked, the report found, with only 16pc of those surveyed saying they replaced fragmented legacy systems with an integrated platform.
And while 59pc of the surveyed professionals said their organisations had moved beyond piloting agentic AI, only 9pc said they have made “meaningful progress” towards building autonomous, multistep workflows.
This comes as global corporate AI spending hit $581bn in 2025, with projections estimating that AI will represent more than 20pc of an organisation’s IT budget by 2027. Government AI spend, meanwhile, rose 140pc year over year, more than any other industry surveyed.
ServiceNow pointed to data quality, governance and workflow foundations as “critical barrier[s]” to scaling AI across the enterprise sector.
Advertisement
It also found that businesses based in Ireland that already operate against rising costs and tighter margins are facing added pressures.
“Organisations in Ireland are among the most ambitious on AI in Europe. The challenge isn’t commitment. It’s connecting that commitment to the operational infrastructure that makes AI work across the enterprise and, more importantly, getting it live with the right guardrails and governance,” explained Paul Turley, senior director at ServiceNow Ireland.
“The organisations that have closed that gap are already seeing returns the rest have yet to match. The contrast is stark – those bridging the gap aren’t just using AI more, they’re using it differently, running autonomous, multi-step workflows at roughly 18 times the rate of the rest of the market.”
Advertisement
ServiceNow’s survey found data to be the biggest barrier to AI execution, with 73pc of EMEA executives citing inadequate data accuracy, access and management as a major barrier.
Only 57pc of surveyed organisations in the region use agentic AI, of which only 9pc use the technology to create autonomous workflows, according to ServiceNow, meaning AI is merely assisting employees without a significant change in how an organisation works.
Meanwhile, only 19pc of EMEA organisations said they have implemented AI testing, auditing and risk processes, despite the bloc’s strict rules.
ServiceNow finds governance maturity as the defining factor between organisations succeeding in the AI race and those lagging behind.
Advertisement
These organisations combine strong data management, testing and risk controls with integrated workflows, enabling them to scale AI confidently, according to the report, and as a result, managed to deliver a 164pc return on investment and expect 199pc ROI within two years.
“Mature governance enables these organisations to scale confidently and move faster than their peers. For Irish businesses, the EU AI Act makes governance unavoidable, but the Index shows it should be welcomed rather than resisted,” said ServiceNow.
Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.
China’s passenger car sales fell 20.2% in H1 2026 to 8.7M units. ICE vehicles down 39% in June. Exports up 82%. Industry margins at 3.4%. A shakeout is coming.
China’s passenger car sales fell 20.2% in the first half of 2026 to 8.7 million units, and the China Passenger Car Association has lowered its full-year forecast to a 14% decline, projecting 20.4 million deliveries, down from a record 23.7 million in 2025. Citic CLSA’s Xiao Feng expects a 20% full-year drop. “This is going to continue to be a brutal year,” said Tu Le, founder of Sino Auto Insights.
The collapse is concentrated in petrol cars. Retail sales of internal combustion engine vehicles fell 39% year-on-year in June, with pure gasoline models down 42%, accounting for 78% of the total decline that month. Transportation energy costs soared 15.3% year-on-year in June, crushing demand for cars that burn fuel. On the electric side, Beijing’s pullback of NEV subsidies that had stimulated record 2025 sales is now pulling demand forward in reverse. “Policy only moves demand around,” Feng told CNBC. Even new energy vehicle sales are expected to fall 5-6%.
Automakers are being squeezed from both ends. Battery input costs, including lithium and memory chips, are rising. Industry profit margins fell to 3.4% in January-May, while industry profits dropped 20% year-on-year. Passenger vehicle prices fell more than 1% in June, further thinning already razor margins. Feng estimates a Chinese automaker needs 500,000 annual sales to break even, 1 million for sustainable profits, and 2 million for full economies of scale. He expects the market to consolidate to seven or eight players by 2030, with BYD (1.8 million H1 sales), Geely (1.4 million), and Leapmotor (356,000) among the survivors alongside Volkswagen and Toyota. Chinese automakers are opening new markets, from Canada to the UK, precisely because the domestic market can no longer absorb their output.
Exports are the lifeline. Total passenger vehicle exports surged 82.3% year-on-year to 877,000 units in June. Chinese EV content is flooding American social media even though 100% tariffs block the cars themselves. The Middle East conflict has driven fuel costs higher worldwide, pushing overseas consumers toward cheaper Chinese EVs. Feng expects a rebound in 2027 as vehicle fleets age and replacement cycles kick in. But between now and then, the shakeout will decide which companies are still around to benefit.
Days after a rival Chinese lab shook Silicon Valley, Alibaba has fired back. The company previewed Qwen3.8, its most powerful model yet, and made a bold claim: it trails only one model on Earth.
Alibaba unveiled the model at the World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai. Its Qwen team said on X that Qwen3.8 is “second only to Fable 5,” a nod to Anthropic’s latest release. Alibaba shares rose as much as 5.4% on Monday.
What Qwen3.8 is
The model holds 2.4 trillion parameters. That makes it the first in the Qwen family above a trillion to be multimodal, meaning it handles images, video and documents as well as text.
Alibaba says Qwen3.8 should beat its own previous flagship, especially at coding and office work such as full-stack development and data analysis. Lead developer Shuai Bai called it the team’s first trillion-parameter multimodal model, with understanding that he said matches or beats leading proprietary systems.
Advertisement
The 💜 of EU tech
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!
The preview is available now. It runs through Alibaba’s Token Plan subscription and its Qoder developer tools, priced at 10% of the standard rate during the trial. Full open weights are promised “soon,” with no date and no licence terms yet.
A claim without the receipts
Here is the catch. Alibaba offered no benchmark scores, no model card, and no independent test to back the “second only to Fable 5” billing, SiliconANGLE reported.
Advertisement
That is a shift for the company. Its last flagship, Qwen3.7-Max, shipped in May with a full set of published results. This one arrived with none.
The gap matters because the comparison is Alibaba’s own. No public leaderboard has scored Qwen3.8. On LMArena, where Fable 5 sits at number one, the older Qwen3.7-Max ranks well down the list. The weights, once released, would let outside researchers check the claim. For now, they cannot.
The open-weight arms race
The timing is no accident. The launch came three days after Moonshot released Kimi K3, a 2.8-trillion-parameter open model that topped a major coding leaderboard and rattled US chip stocks. Alibaba’s move reads as a direct answer, The Decoder noted.
A cluster of Chinese labs is now shipping models at a scale once reserved for the biggest US labs. Moonshot has Kimi K3. Zhipu has GLM-5.2. All are chasing the frontier, and most are handing out their weights for free.
Advertisement
There is a strategic wrinkle. Alibaba, like Moonshot, is putting the model in paid products first and releasing the weights later. It turns the launch buzz into customers before anyone can run the model for nothing.
The bigger signal is what Alibaba is promising to open up at all. Its largest models have not usually been open-weight, a point several analysts flagged. “Something is changing,” the AI researcher Nathan Lambert wrote, reading the shift as a new phase of competition among Chinese labs.
Handing over a claimed number-two system, if the weights match the hype, would push the open-weight field deeper into frontier territory. That is the ground US labs have guarded most closely. The proof, though, lands only when the download does. Until then, Alibaba is asking the market to take its word for it.
Samsung is expected to announce the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 on Wednesday.
Holgs/Getty Images
We’re just two days out from Samsung’s Galaxy Unpacked event, but that’s still enough time for more leaks. This time it’s the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2, which is set to be announced at the event. Evan Blass, who runs the Substack Leakmail, has published a slew of renderings depicting the new smartwatch.
We got a first look at the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 design earlier this month thanks to Android Headlines, but Leakmail’s post includes new perspectives and specs. For instance, the leaked photos show an upgrade to an IP69K dust- and water-resistance rating, compared to the 2025 Galaxy Watch Ultra’s IP68 rating. They also state that the new model is 12% thinner than its predecessor.
If the leak is accurate, the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 will come with an 800 mAh battery, up from 590 mAh on the 2025 model. The latest watch should also offer a much brighter display with up to 5,000 nits, a significant boost from 3,000 nits.
Advertisement
As for performance, Blass claims the watch will use the Snapdragon Wear Elite chip, corroborating another leak from last week. According to a separate leak from Blass, the upcoming Galaxy Watch 9 will be powered by the same chip.
We’ll have to wait until Wednesday to get confirmation — and price points — for Samsung’s new flagship wearable.
The Hugging Face artificial intelligence repository disclosed that attackers gained access to internal datasets and credentials after breaching its production infrastructure using an autonomous AI agent system.
Hugging Face is an open-source AI and machine learning platform that provides access to over 45,000 models from leading AI providers and is used by more than 50,000 organizations.
The company is still investigating whether partner or customer data was affected and said it would contact any affected parties directly. Hugging Face said it has found no evidence of tampering with public-facing models, datasets, or Spaces to date, and that its software supply chain has been “verified clean.”
The intrusion began in Hugging Face’s data-processing pipeline, with the attackers using a malicious dataset to exploit two code-execution vulnerabilities and run code on a processing worker. This allowed them to steal cloud and cluster credentials and move laterally across several internal clusters.
“The campaign was run by an autonomous agent framework (appearing to be built on an agentic security-research harness – used LLM still not known) executing many thousands of individual actions across a swarm of short-lived sandboxes, with self-migrating command-and-control staged on public services,” Hugging Face said in an incident disclosure published Thursday. “This matches the ‘agentic attacker’ scenario the industry has been forecasting.”
Advertisement
In response to the breach, Hugging Face has closed the vulnerable code execution paths (a template injection in a dataset configuration and a remote code dataset loader), evicted the attacker, rebuilt the compromised nodes, and revoked and rotated all affected credentials.
It also deployed improved malicious activity detection systems, reported the incident to law enforcement, and is now working with external forensic experts to assess the breach’s impact.
“We do not know which model powered the attacker’s agents, whether a jailbroken hosted model or an unrestricted open-weight one; either way, the attacker was bound by no usage policy, while our own forensic work was blocked by the guardrails of the hosted models we first tried,” Hugging Face added.
“The practical lesson for defenders: have a capable model you can run on your own infrastructure vetted and ready before an incident, both to avoid guardrail lockout and to keep attacker data and credentials from leaving your environment.”
Advertisement
Hugging Face advised users to rotate access tokens and review recent account activity for signs of suspicious behavior and said it would continue sharing findings on defending against AI-driven attacks.
While this is the first security incident affecting the platform that has been linked to an AI agent, it’s not the first breach disclosed by Hugging Face in recent years.
The company also revoked some members’ authentication secrets and advised them to switch to fine-grained access tokens two years ago after hackers breached its Spaces platform.
NordStellar reports 2,581 ransomware attacks in Q2 2026, with Qilin (299) and The Gentlemen (284) leading activity, far ahead of DragonForce (147)
US SMBs were hit hardest, suffering 769 incidents; Canada (97), Germany (83), and the UK (74) followed, while attacks on billion‑dollar enterprises surged 74%
Experts say rivalry between Qilin and The Gentlemen is driving the spike, with major corporate hits seen as reputation‑boosting trophies in the cybercriminal underground
Two ransomware gangs are battling for dominance, and US-based SMBs are the ones suffering most for it, experts have claimed.
Fresh data about the state of ransomware in 2026, compiled by security experts from NordStellar, shows two groups – Qilin and The Gentlemen – being by far the most active ones.
After analyzing more than 200 threat actor blogs, NordStellar concluded that there were 2,581 ransomware attacks in the second quarter of the year – and of that number, 299 belong to Qilin, the most active threat actor out there. Close second are The Gentlemen, with 284 attacks. The third most active group – DragonForce – doesn’t even come close with “just” 147 attacks.
Latest Videos From
SMBs and enterprises under assault
While it seems like a close race, it’s actually The Gentlemen who have been doing the heavy lifting between April and June 2026. This group experienced a 39% increase in attacks, while Qilin’s activity actually declined somewhat, compared to Q1.
Advertisement
In this morbid race to the bottom, the biggest victims are US-based small and medium-sized businesses (SMB). These companies, with up to 200 employees and revenues under $25 million, experienced 769 attacks in Q2 2026, followed by Canada (97), Germany (83), and the UK (74).
NordStellar also mentioned US enterprises, who are now increasingly being targeted. Attacks against organizations with revenues north of $1 billion surged by 74%, going from 23 incidents in Q1, to 40 in Q2.
“Ransomware actors historically target SMBs because these organizations often lack comprehensive defenses, which can increase the likelihood of a successful attack,” commented Vakaris Noreika, cybersecurity expert at NordStellar.
Advertisement
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
“This recent spike in enterprise targeting is unusual and may be a temporary fluctuation. This shift likely stems from the rivalry between dominant threat actors — a successful hit on a major corporation is a badge of honor that boosts a group’s reputation within the cybercriminal underground.”
In Obsession, an awkward young man gets more than he bargained for when he wishes for his crush to love him back with the help of a gag gift from a novelty store. After a rocky start, Bear gets what he wanted… sort of… before his relationship with Nikki takes a series of increasingly bizarre turns and goes completely off the rails.
In his feature film debut, writer, director, and editor Curry Barker demonstrates one of those uniquely original voices that makes us rethink what a horror movie can be, shocking even genre buffs and video reviewers who think they have seen it all. With tips of the cap to The Twilight Zone and Get Out, the script takes us places we have never been, growing deeper and darker while maintaining a surprising amount of humor in perfect balance.
The performances help tremendously, with the lead actors bringing a naturalistic edginess that ensures we never quite know what to expect next. Props to newcomer Inde Navarrette as Nikki, who is so terrifying that she reportedly made her costars, and herself, quite uncomfortable.
The movie is presented in the unusual 1.5:1 aspect ratio, with vertical black bars on the left and right and occasional elements within the frame that add to the sense of claustrophobia, as though the characters are trapped in their predicament. Director of photography Taylor Clemons often backlights the actors to creepy effect, but the high dynamic range preserves ample facial detail, while the precise image reveals haphazard shaving stubble, the fine fibers of a sweater, and the uneven degrees of focus within the frame.
You could call the sonic jolts in Obsession’s Dolby Atmos mix “jump scares,” but not in the same way as in, say, a Freddy or Jason style slasher. Instead, an abrupt beat might trigger the question, “What the hell is she going to do next?” The answer: Nothing good. Hard offscreen cues do a good job of establishing three-dimensional space, while Rock Burwell’s musical score envelops us but also bludgeons us from time to time, leaving us exhausted by the end credits.
Advertisement
Barker’s audio commentary track is definitely worth a listen for the infectious energy of a filmmaker at the top of his game. In a hurry? Check out the 19-minute “Obsession Unleashed” featurette, which also brings in the principal actors to share their own behind-the-scenes tidbits. The two-disc set includes an HD Blu-ray of the movie with the same extras, plus a 4K Movies Anywhere digital copy code.
This is definitely one I’ll be watching again, which is another reason physical media rocks. There are plenty of clues and little Easter eggs waiting to be discovered and dissected, a testament to the thoroughly smart script and the clever way Barker executes his twisty vision.
Movie Details
STUDIO: Universal Pictures Home Entertainment
FORMAT: Ultra HD 4K Blu-ray (July 14, 2026)
THEATRICAL RELEASE YEAR: 2026
ASPECT RATIO: 1.50:1
HDR FORMATS: Dolby Vision, HDR10
AUDIO FORMAT: Dolby Atmos with TrueHD 7.1 core
LENGTH: 109 mins.
MPAA RATING: R
DIRECTOR: Curry Barker
STARRING: Inde Navarrette, Michael Johnston, Cooper Tomlinson, Megan Lawless, Andy Richter, Darin Toonder
You must be logged in to post a comment Login