TL;DR
Apple is aiming for a WWDC 2027 smart glasses unveil and is debating whether to include a camera amid the privacy backlash Meta created
Summer ushers in sweltering temperatures, long nights full of backyard parties, cookouts, and campfires, and a desire to clean and organize your vehicle, lawn, and garage, which is arguably odd considering how hot the days can get. That said, to get your home looking ready for hangouts with friends and family, a little bit of cleaning and organizing is necessary, so we see the connection.
For gadgets to beat the heat (and bugs), foldable finds that stash easily in your garage, and great practical items to get your home party-ready, head to Lowe’s. The retailer has great summer savings on offer across multiple categories, from must-have DIY gadgets to adorable mini tools everyone can appreciate and top-tier power tools and equipment. We’ve gathered up some of the best items you can grab at Lowe’s for the summer. (Note that while prices are accurate at the time of writing, pricing as well as availability can vary by location.)
Even those who declare summer their favorite season can’t deny that some summer days are simply too hot. If you can’t ditch your DIY projects at home to head to the pool or the beach to cool off, this Kobalt 7-Inch Personal Fan will serve you well. It delivers air flow up to 600 cubic feet per minute (CFM) at max speed, though you can adjust the fan’s speed lower as needed with five different speeds in total. At its lowest speed setting, this little fan can last up to 60 hours on a single charge using a Kobalt 24-volt max battery (sold separately).
This small fan measures 18 inches high and 14 inches wide, has a 7-inch fan diameter, and weighs only 5.5 pounds, all of which make it ideal for carrying around between your garage, the backyard, and even out to soccer games or jobsites. Its ability to switch between standing on its own and being hung paired with its multi-position, 180-degree fan head rotation make it a great add anywhere. It retails for $119, but because it’s a hot summer item at Lowe’s, it’s often discounted or attached to some type of deal, like a free battery and charger with your purchase.
It just doesn’t feel like summer without at least a few nights spent cooking up good food in the backyard, and that’s why a new grill is always going to be one of the top summer items you can buy. Whether your old grill is hanging on by a thread and needs replacing, or you’re adding one to your backyard setup for the first time, the Weber Spirit E-325 Gas Grill is could be a great option. At full price, it’s a $549 investment, but if you’re able to wait for a sale, you can snag it for less.
This gas grill features porcelain-enameled cast iron grates that leave meat and veggies with appetizing sear marks, Snap-Jet Ignition that allows you to ignite individual burners by simply turning the appropriate knob with one hand, and scratch-resistant Hammertone metal side tables that can fold down when not needed. There are also a slew of optional snap-on accessories made for Weber grills, sold separately, that can attach to the side tables to make grilling easier, including tool hooks, a bottle holder, flexible lighting, and a condiment holder.
One of the easiest ways to jazz up your backyard and get it ready for summer parties is adding string lights, but you have to make sure they’re properly rated for outdoor use, like this $49.98 Harbor Breeze String Light at Lowe’s. With shatter-resistant plastic bulbs and an IP65 rating, these lights are dust-tight and protected against water jets from any direction, meaning they’ll withstand light rain, snow, heavy thunderstorms, and extremely windy and dusty conditions. Just in case there is any damage to the bulbs or the fuses, this set includes two replacement bulbs and one replacement fuse.
Depending on the size of your backyard and where exactly you want to hang outdoor string lights, you might be good with one 48-foot String Light from Harbor Breeze or you might need to budget for two or three. Across the 48-foot string, there are 18 Edison-style LED bulbs producing warm white light that adds a nice ambience to summer dinners and parties. Or if you’d rather invest in a permanent solution, check out these highly rated permanent outdoor lights.
With hotter summer temperatures, your garden generally needs more water to stay happy and healthy. If you don’t have a sprinkler system set up, or you simply prefer watering all your plants by hand, adding a nozzle to your water hose can make the chore easier and faster. And luckily, most nozzles aren’t that expensive. This Orbit Nozzle at Lowe’s retails for only $7.98 and it offers quite a few quality-of-life features for that single-digit price.
This hose nozzle allows for seven different spray patterns, which are described as shower, flat, center, cone, full, mist, and jet. You can use gentle watering, like shower or mist, for some plants, a powerful jet stream for dirty plant pots, and play around with other spray patterns to find their best use. The nozzle has a rear trigger that’s comfortable to engage, and there’s a simple trigger lock feature that lets you sustain whichever spray pattern you selected without having to constantly hold down the trigger. The handle is also insulated, so you don’t have to worry about it being too hot in the summer or too cold in the fall or winter when you want to use it.
A lot of us don’t necessarily have extra time in the summer, but because we want to be outside more soaking up the sun, the urge to sort through and organize the garage can be quite strong. One of the best Lowe’s finds to help organize your garage is this five-tier Utility Shelving Unit by Project Source. It retails for $104.98, but if you’re lucky, you can lower your out-of-pocket costs with summer savings at Lowe’s.
The whole unit is made with hard plastic that’s easy to keep clean, resistant to mold, and sturdy. The shelves are ventilated to prevent moisture buildup, measure 20 inches deep by 48 inches wide, and can hold up to 200 pounds. With five shelves in total, this entire unit can hold up to 1,000 pounds of power tools, holiday decorations, childhood memorabilia, and more. Aside from the top shelf that has unlimited vertical space, there’s 14.5 inches between each shelf, giving plenty of space to store common tote bin sizes.
Summer nights can be magical, full of bonfires, cookouts, and pool parties, but one thing can always ruin the night: mosquitos. Rather than cover up with long sleeves and pants or cover yourself in sticky (and stinky) bug spray, Lowe’s has this Thermacell Charcoal Mosquito Repeller. Just place it on a surface central to your get together, press a button to activate it, and then enjoy protection against mosquitos within 20 feet of the device.
To start you off, there’s 12 hours of mosquito repellent included with your $39.98 purchase of the device. After that, a two-count refill pack currently costs $38.98 and gets you a total of 72 hours worth of mosquito repellent. The repellant uses Thermacell’s proprietary formula that’s been proven to repel mosquitos, even those carrying EEE and West Nile Virus, from within 20 feet of the device. To activate heat and start repelling mosquitos, all you have to do is make sure the device has enough charge to last through your event and push a button. On a full charge, the battery can last up to 5.5 hours.
Whether you’re in an area that gets dry or humid heat, you’ll feel even hotter in direct sunlight with no shade. If you don’t have a huge tree, an covered patio, or anything else in your backyard that can provide you with shade in the summer heat, you might consider buying this Pop-Up Canopy from Z-Shade. It’s surprisingly affordable at $98 full price and it’s a convenient addition to your yard for summer, especially if you plan on hosting any daytime parties with friends and family.
The 10-foot by 10-foot slant leg steel frame is a single piece with adjustable and extendable legs, which makes it super easy to set up with zero tools, and it’s been white powder-coated for resistance to rust and overall durability. Attaching to the steel frame is the blue, 150-denier canopy that features a silver undercoating and provides 50+ UV protection. With the canopy set up on the frame, it delivers 64 square feet of shade coverage. When you’re ready to take it down and head inside, there’s a zippered carry bag with wheels that neatly fits all the components.
Summer bonfires can be legendary, but not everyone has the space to safely set one up in their backyard, and many cities might have burn bans in place during high temperatures. A good alternative to the traditional bonfire is the Origin Portable Fire Pit, which retails for only $94 at Lowe’s right now. That said, some cities also restrict open burning altogether, which would include this fire pit, so be sure to check your local laws to see what’s allowed in your area.
This Origin Fire Pit features a 28-inch deep fire bowl with a powder-coated finish that’s made for high temperatures, a poker so you can safely stoke the fire from afar, and a mesh screen cover to help contain the fire and prevent items from accidentally falling inside the bowl. In addition to stoking the flames, the poker can hook around the ring on top of the mesh screen and lower it into place if the fire is already roaring when you’re ready to cover it.
Lawn work isn’t the most exciting summer chore, but someone has to do it, and you might as well make the task as easy as possible for yourself. Enter: this handy combination of a Craftsman String Trimmer and Leaf Blower. Together, these two power tools retail for $169, but Lowe’s is usually running some kind of deal on them to bring that price down to a more manageable number.
Both lawn tools use a 4Ah battery, and there’s one included (along with a charger for the battery) with this bundle, so you can swap between them as needed. The string trimmer is equipped with a turn-to-edge feature, an integrated wheeled edge guide, a wide 10-inch cutting swath, and an automatic feed spool for convenience. Then, the blower provides up to 200 CFM (and up to 90 mph) of air flow, more than enough to clear your sidewalks, driveway, and garage of leaves, grass, dirt, and other small debris. This Craftsman blower model also comes with an integrated nozzle scraper to help remove stuck-on debris.
To get your driveway, sidewalks, and home looking all spick and span for your next summer bash, you need a pressure washer. The Greenworks 3,000 PSI Pressure Washer retails for $449, and if that’s too steep a price even with potential summer discounts, you could look into Lowe’s Lease to Own program to bring down the upfront cost. Or, consider Greenworks’ 2,000 PSI Pressure Washer instead for a slightly less powerful, more affordable option in the long run.
With the help of a continuous-run brushless motor and pump that function like gas-powered pressure washers, the Greenworks 3,000 PSI pressure washer can push out a max water flow of 2 gallons per minute (GPM). Depending on which included nozzle you opt for, this max could dip to 1.1 GPM. This model comes with five different spray nozzles (Turbo, Soap, 15 degrees, 25 degrees, and 40 degrees), a metal spray gun, a 25-foot kink-resistant hose, and a 1-gallon, built-in soap tank. It’s easy to maneuver from place to place, thanks to 10-inch, never-flat wheels, and you can store it vertically in your garage so it doesn’t take up much space.
When you feel like simultaneously cooling off in water and being productive, a solid option is cleaning your car. This 2-in-1 Foam Cannon from Armor All is one of the best car accessories you can pick up at Lowe’s, and all you need to set it up for the first time is a garden hose or a pressure washer. For the best clean, Armor All recommends a pressure washer, which can be gas or electric and offer a pressure range between 500 and 3,500 PSI. However, if a garden hose is all you have, it’ll get the job done.
The $41.58 kit comes with an adapter each for a garden hose and a pressure washer and a foam cannon featuring a wide non-tip bottle, a non-slip grip, and a 40-ounce reservoir for water and car wash soap with marked lines to make measuring easier. For particularly dirty spots, you can apply some extra car wash soap before foam spraying the entire car.
If you already have a grill you love, Lowe’s has plenty of great grilling accessories you can shop this summer. We’re fond of this $59.99 Blackstone Six-Piece Tool Set that could be perfect for cooking a variety of foods, including pancakes and eggs, burgers, steaks, vegetables, and more. The set includes two spatulas, an angled griddle scraper, one pair of scraper tongs, and two 16-ounce squeeze bottles. The squeeze bottles are made with plastic and the other tools are formed from stainless steel, and every piece in this set is dishwasher safe for easy cleanup.
These scraper tongs allow you to handle hot food without hurting yourself, and the angled scraper is designed to help you remove any grease buildup, stuck-on food, or other tough messes. There are two potential uses for the squeeze bottles; you can use one or both to hold sauces or cooking oil, or keep water in one and use it for cleaning the grill while it’s still hot. Then, the two spatulas can be used for flipping, of course, or breaking up foods while cooking.
This Kobalt Four-Drawer Rolling Tool Cabinet could be a solid buy if you need a way to both organize your tool collection and conveniently cart it around the garage with you. It’s a pricey investment at $269, but its ample storage capacity, helpful built-in features, and well-built design make it compelling and potentially a great product to have on hand in the garage.
With four locking drawers and a top compartment, this rolling cart offers 12,600 cubic inches of storage space. The two small drawers on top can support up to 22 pounds each, the two large drawers can hold up to 77 pounds each, and the top compartment supports 88 pounds. And even if you have it loaded to max capacity, it’ll still move around smoothly, thanks to four 5-inch caster wheels. All four wheels can swivel, and two can be locked to hold the cabinet in place.
An insulated hard cooler is handy in the summer for camping, sports games, backyard parties, and even grilling sessions with just your immediate family. At $159, this RTIC 32-Quart Hard Insulated Cooler is steep, but RTIC is a cooler brand known for delivering high-quality products that last and keep food and drinks super cold. This 32-Quart cooler in particular is equipped with up to 2.5 inches of closed-cell foam insulation, which is designed to keep the cooler’s contents cold for up to five days — at least when following RTIC’s cooling recommendations.
As part of RTIC’s Ultra-Light lineup, the company estimates it to be about 30% lighter than other similarly sized, rotomolded coolers, weighing in at just under 15 pounds with no contents inside. The cooler can hold up to 48 cans at once and comes with comfortable rope handles, non-skid rubber feet, molded tie-down slots, dual drain holes, a silicone cargo net, and a built-in stainless steel bottle opener.
This XL Steam Clean BBQ Brush could be a great accessory for anyone who already has a grill they love, and it’s affordable, retailing for just $19.98. Created in partnership by Mr. Bar-B-Q and Scrub Daddy, this brush is equipped with a heavy duty scraper for grease buildup and, attached to the back of the scraper, a bristle-free, stainless steel Armortec mesh sponge for every other kind of mess imaginable.
The brush doesn’t require any specific cleaning agents to help it clean. Instead, it uses only water, or more specifically, steam. After the grill has been preheated to 300 degrees Fahrenheit, you dunk the brush’s scrubbing head into ice cold water and then start cleaning away. According to its listing, the brush can tackle burnt-on food and stuck-on grease without shedding, but this could depend on just how dirty your grill grates are, as some customers report shedding or peeling after only a few uses.
To create this collection of top Lowe’s finds, we followed a set of simple guidelines. Most importantly, each item needed to fit the summer theme we’re going for, whether it was an item for summer fun like a grill or a fire pit, or something practical like lawn tools or storage solutions for your garage. Then, to ensure an item has built up a solid reputation for being one of the best Lowe’s has to offer, it needed to have a minimum of 150 total reviews and at least a 4-star average rating.
After OpenAI recently admitted that one of its models had breached the systems of AI platform Hugging Face, Hugging Face’s CEO Clem Delangue posted on X that he was flying to San Francisco to have “a little chat with that ‘rogue agent.’”
Then, in a follow-up post on Saturday, Delangue outlined what he’d asked for from OpenAI. He said he called for “radical transparency,” asking OpenAI to “release the traces from the ‘rogue’ agents so the entire research community can study what happened.”
And he also wants “more capabilities for defenders,” calling for OpenAI to commit $100 million worth of computing power “to help the Hugging Face community build powerful cyber defenses with the best open and closed models.”
Delangue added, “The first autonomous agent cyberattack is an unprecedented event. It deserves an unprecedented response!”
Despite the autonomous nature of the attack, cybersecurity experts suggested that it could also be blamed on human error — namely, OpenAI’s apparent failure to properly configure what should have been a fully isolated testing environment.
Security
(Security) hole-ier than thou
Click To Pray, a prayer app endorsed by the Pope with hundreds of thousands of users worldwide, has leaked people’s names and email addresses for months – or longer – according to an ethical hacker who said she found and reported the security vulnerability six months ago to no avail. This app needs to take a vow of silence when it comes to your personal information.
The app, available in seven languages and on iOS, Android, and clicktopray.org, is the official app of the Pope’s Worldwide Prayer Network. It connects users across the globe to pray for the Holy Father’s intentions, and as of July 2026, it has 719,517 registered accounts.
It’s also very leaky, according to security sleuth BobDaHacker, who says she spotted and disclosed the vulnerability to the Pope’s Worldwide Prayer Network on January 3.
“The vulnerability is still live,” the hacker said in a Friday blog. “Nobody has ever responded. I guess my email wasn’t in their prayers.”
The Reg readers likely remember BobDaHacker for her previous research exposing a free-food flaw in McDonald’s ordering system and open controls on Chinese robot manufacturer Pudu Robotics.
This latest security hole stems from an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) bug in the prayer app. This is a very common and easy-to-exploit type of flaw that occurs when a website or an app blindly accepts user-provided input to view or modify resources without checking to see if the user is actually authorized to retrieve the data.
“You ask for your own data, the server gives it to you,” BobDaHacker explains. “You ask for someone else’s data, the server gives you that too. Thou shalt not authorize, apparently.”
When you sign up for a Click To Pray account, the app assigns you a sequential numeric user ID. As BobDaHacker uncovered, the API endpoint GET https://api[.]clicktopray.org/user/users/{id} will return user data for any account – not just your own account – so long as you supply a valid, five-digit user ID.
It doesn’t perform any authorization check or ownership validation. “Just increment the number and get someone else’s data,” she wrote.
This data includes users’ email addresses, first and last names, country, dates of birth, and whether the account has been deleted, and the API exposes all 719,517 accounts on the prayer site. “With sequential user IDs and no rate limiting, an attacker could enumerate every single account on the platform,” the hacker explained. “One GET request per user. for i in range(1, 719518): scrape(). That’s it. That’s the exploit.”
As BobDaHacker points out, many of these users are likely older individuals, not all that tech savvy, and very trusting of anything Vatican related, making these exposed accounts a “phishing goldmine.”
“Imagine getting an email that says ‘The Holy Father requests your urgent attention’ with a Vatican-looking link,” she wrote. “Grandma is clicking that. Every time.”
And then it gets even worse.
The signup endpoint, POST https://api.clicktopray.org/user/users/sign-up, returns the account’s validation_hash directly in the response body, and that value is the same UUID used in the email verification link. This means someone could sign up using any email address and verify the account before the confirmation message reached the inbox.
Plus, BobDaHacker’s email client flagged the real verification email with a warning that it had failed the domain’s authentication requirements and might have been spoofed or improperly forwarded.
“So not only is the API leaking 700,000 email addresses that could be used for phishing, but the real emails from Click To Pray already look like phishing,” the hacker noted. “An attacker wouldn’t even need to try hard. They could send a pixel-perfect phishing email and it would have the same level of email authentication as the real thing: none. God works in mysterious ways.”
The Register reached out to the Pope’s Worldwide Prayer Network and did not receive any response. BobDaHacker says she’s still praying for one, too.®
Your battery is continually losing charge.
Even though smartphone batteries are getting bigger and more efficient, there’s always that inevitable event when you get a low battery notification at the worst possible time. You might think powering down the phone entirely is a way to make your smartphone last longer. But like with any battery-powered device, a phone’s battery will slowly deplete when you’re not actively using it, and even when it’s completely powered down.
Of course, the battery drains much more slowly when turned off, so it’s not a bad idea to power down the phone to conserve battery. That might be before a plane takes off, for example, and you want to ensure you have power when you arrive at your destination. If you leave an old phone in a drawer for weeks or months then decide to use it, however, you’ll find that the battery isn’t still at the same percentage it was when you left it.
Why does this happen? One thing that draws battery from your phone while it’s off is a clock-and-wake circuit, which uses a tiny amount of current so that the power button responds when you want to turn it on and so the phone immediately knows the right time and date once it boots back up. But the biggest battery drain is something called a self-discharge, a chemical release of the lithium-ion batteries used in phones. The battery will lose about 1-2 percent of its power every month or so when turned off. If you store it in a spot that’s above room temperature, it will deplete even faster than that.
If you leave the phone on and don’t use it, the battery will logically drain much more quickly. I have left Android phones I’m testing untouched for up to a week, for example, and they easily go from about half charge to completely dead in that time. That said, if you’re giving a phone a break, it’s still a good idea to power it down completely. While there’s still that self-discharge, it will be much slower than if you leave the phone on. When the device is on, the screen lights up for notifications, the radio remains active and latched onto signals, and background apps are using power.
If you plan to keep a phone tucked away long-term, like if you upgraded and you’re waiting for your pre-teen to become of age so they can use it, it’s wise to keep the device charged consistently to avoid damage. Apple recommends not fully charging your phone before you put it away for an extended period, suggesting you charge an iPhone only to about 50 percent. Then recharge it every so often (Apple recommends every six months) so it’s always topped up and not lying completely dormant.
This prevents something called a deep-discharge state, which can happen when a device’s battery has been completely dead for a long period of time. If it gets to this point, the phone’s battery’s copper current collector can dissolve, redeposit, and permanently impact the phone’s battery capacity, or even potentially cause a short circuit. At the very least, the loss in battery capacity means the phone wont last as long per charge going forward.
To recap, if you’re storing a phone, power it down when the battery is at about 50 percent and charge it back up to this point at least every six months. Most importantly, don’t throw it in a drawer completely dead nor fully charged. Don’t forget to store it in a cool, dry place with temperatures below 90°F.
All that said, leaving a phone lying around for months isn’t a total death sentence. I have left some of the best Android phones released over the last five years powered down for months and charged them for comparative reviews. They work fine even if the battery capacity isn’t as good. I even recently found an old BlackBerry PlayBook tablet that hadn’t been booted up since 2011. I plugged it in and it successfully charged and works! But it’s clear the battery life has lessened as it barely lasts a day before I need to recharge it.
The bottom line is that if you power down your phone, it won’t have the same charge state when you power it back up, especially if weeks or months have gone by. It might still show the same battery percentage if you’ve only powered it down for a 12-hour flight, but the battery is still draining through self-discharge and the clock-and-wake circuit, albeit so slowly you won’t notice after such a short period of time. However long you turn off the phone, powering down doesn’t mean the phone’s battery is completely on pause until you use it again. But it can help conserve what battery life you have left in a pinch.
For most owners, keeping a vehicle ultra-clean isn’t an easy task. Nonetheless, the health benefits of having a car that’s free from germs are inarguable. Hyundai and Kia just unveiled new technology that aims to help make eliminating those germs a lot easier.
The carmaker is calling the technology “Plasma Care UVC,” and it uses far-ultraviolet C light with a wavelength of about 200-230 nanometers to sterilize a car’s cabin. UV sterilization devices are not new, but traditionally, some use UV light of a slightly longer wavelength than Hyundai’s new system. As a result, they have the potential to cause skin and eye damage if a human is exposed to them.
Hyundai says the far-UVC light it is using in its new technology won’t cause damage, since the light doesn’t penetrate human skin. However, it does still penetrate into bacteria and viruses, making it an effective way to sanitize a car even when the driver and passengers are present.
Although this is the first time that far-UVC light sanitizers have been fitted to a vehicle cabin, similar systems that use the same wavelength of light are already used to clean rooms in healthcare settings like hospitals, as well as sanitizing hotels and classrooms.
Hyundai says that its engineers encountered several challenges when trying to make the system work in cars, with one of the biggest being that the existing systems were simply too big to fit. Its team had to develop a new, miniaturized version of the system, as well as fitting an optical filter to ensure that no UV light of a harmful wavelength was emitted.
To test that the system worked as intended, the carmaker fitted it to a PV5 minivan. This model in particular was picked because it can be used for a range of different transport jobs, shuttling both passengers and cargo to their destinations.
Following the initial successful tests, Hyundai said that its technology could potentially be applied to autonomous vehicles and PBVs, a term that it has previously used to describe its modular electric vehicles that can be designed for a specific job. It gave the examples of school minibuses and food selling vehicles as two instances where sanitizing technology might be especially useful.
As appealing as the new technology might sound to germaphobes, it isn’t available to the general public just yet. Hyundai has not given a timeframe for when the UV sanitizers might launch in its production vehicles, saying only that it needs to conduct more safety and technical validation tests before it gives them approval for production.
“Welcome home!” NASA posted on X.com, sharing footage of a successful “parachute-assisted” landing on a Kazakhstan steppe for the Soyuz MS-28, carrying three astronauts who’d spent 241 days on the International Space Station. (And YouTube has a full two-hour video with NASA’s coverage of the landing.)
A NASA web page notes they orbited Earth 3,856 times and traveling more than 102 million miles after docking with the Space Station on November 27. It was the first mission for NASA astronaut Chris Williams and Roscosmos cosmonaut Sergei Mikaev (and the second mission for Roscosmos cosmonaut Sergey Kud-Sverchkov). “After routine post-landing medical checks, recovery teams will fly the crew by helicopter to Karaganda, Kazakhstan. Williams then will board a NASA aircraft bound for the agency’s Johnson Space Center in Houston.”
SCIENCE
So, how are those commercial replacements working out for you, NASA?
This week marks 15 years since a Space Shuttle last returned from orbit and the end of NASA’s Space Shuttle program.
Space Shuttle Atlantis landed at the Shuttle Landing Facility (SLF) at Kennedy Space Center 15 years ago this week, marking the final mission for the program.
STS-135 was originally designated STS-335, the Launch On Need (LON) mission for the previous STS-134 flight of Space Shuttle Endeavour. LON missions had been a feature of the Space Shuttle program following the Columbia disaster.
If a Space Shuttle was damaged, another could be launched at short notice to rescue the crew. NASA assigned Launch On Need flights separate STS-3xx designations, so the rescue mission for STS-116 was STS-317, STS-117 was STS-318, and so on. There were exceptions (a notable one was the STS-125 Hubble servicing mission, which had STS-400 ready to go if anything went wrong), but the Space Shuttle program should have ended with STS-134.
However, lawmakers and NASA managers opted to make STS-135 the final Space Shuttle mission. There could be no Launch On Need mission waiting in the wings this time around – the Space Shuttle program was being wound down – so the crew would have had to come down from the International Space Station (ISS) aboard Soyuz capsules if Atlantis could not return to Earth safely. There were also only four crew members, a figure not seen since the STS-6 mission of Challenger in 1983.
The crew was commanded by Christopher Ferguson, who would later join Boeing’s Commercial Crew Program and was assigned to (although did not fly) Boeing’s calamity capsule, the Starliner. The pilot for STS-135 was Douglas Hurley, who went on to fly the first crewed test flight of SpaceX’s Crew Dragon in 2020. Rounding out the crew were mission specialists Sandra Magnus and Rex Walheim.
The launch occurred on July 8, 2011, and Atlantis returned from orbit on July 21, bringing the Space Shuttle program to a conclusion.
It wasn’t, however, the end of crewed spaceflight for the US, although the gap that followed was considerably greater than expected or hoped. After the Space Shuttle retired, the US was dependent on Russia for getting its astronauts to and from the ISS. NASA later awarded Commercial Crew contracts to SpaceX and Boeing to restore launches from US soil, but it took SpaceX until 2020 to get the first humans to the outpost, and Boeing until 2024.
The latter’s mission was marked by ignominy due to failures and faults during the mission that meant managers opted to send the capsule back to Earth empty from the ISS and have the Starliner flight test crew return in 2025 aboard a SpaceX vehicle. NASA and Boeing have yet to set a definitive date for when a crew might venture to the ISS once again aboard Starliner.
All of which, 15 years after a Space Shuttle returned from orbit for the last time, has left the US space agency in a bit of a pickle. Instead of depending on the Space Shuttle, the plan was to reduce risk and add redundancy to US capabilities with two providers, but things haven’t worked out that way. To make matters worse, there is uncertainty about how much longer SpaceX will continue to fly the Crew Dragon beyond its contracted missions. The vehicle is reusable, but no more are planned to be manufactured, and SpaceX reckons that each should be good for 15 flights, with some refurbishment.
This should be enough to get through to the end of the ISS program and beyond, but in the longer term an alternative will be required. For SpaceX, this will likely be Starship.
The fate of the Space Shuttles themselves is also not completely set. Atlantis has been staged in a facility at Kennedy Space Center as if in orbit, and the California Science Center has mounted Space Shuttle Endeavour on an external tank and solid rocket boosters, as though ready for launch. The fate of Space Shuttle Discovery is, however, uncertain. Certain lawmakers would very much like to transport the retired orbiter from the Smithsonian’s Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center in Virginia to Houston, Texas.
For others, well, there’s always a used Orion capsule. ®
Apple is aiming for a WWDC 2027 smart glasses unveil and is debating whether to include a camera amid the privacy backlash Meta created
Apple is currently aiming to unveil its first smart glasses at next June’s Worldwide Developers Conference, with a consumer release by the end of 2027, according to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman. But the company’s engineering and marketing teams are still wrestling with a question that will define the product: whether its glasses should include a camera at all. The teams developing the device, code-named N50, within Apple’s Vision hardware group see privacy as the top priority, Gurman reported on Saturday.
That caution is a direct response to the backlash Meta created. Meta has sold more than seven million pairs of its Ray-Ban smart glasses, but the product’s camera has become a lightning rod for privacy complaints, with women being secretly filmed in public and Kenyan data workers reporting they were asked to review intimate footage captured by the devices. Apple executives are acutely aware that simply entering the same category risks undermining a privacy reputation the company has spent more than a decade building.
Apple is planning safeguards that go beyond what Meta and Samsung have offered. The company will favour on-device processing, eschew facial recognition, and avoid anything resembling Meta’s proposed “super-sensing” mode, which would continuously analyse a wearer’s surroundings without activating the recording indicator light. Apple also does not plan to follow Meta’s practice of having contractors review footage captured by its glasses, having already dealt with a similar controversy around its Siri voice assistant.
One option Apple executives have debated would include the full camera system but disable photo and video recording entirely, limiting the cameras to feeding visual data into AI tools that identify objects and places. Another prototype eliminates the camera hardware altogether, retaining hands-free Siri access, music playback, and phone calls without any recording capability. Both approaches would sacrifice what has made Meta’s glasses popular: effortless first-person video of holidays, children, and sporting events.
The privacy problem is not theoretical. Apple is entering one of the most important product cycles in its history, with the 20th anniversary iPhone, a second-generation foldable, camera-equipped AirPods, and new Macs all expected in 2027. Courtrooms across New York State have already banned smart glasses, Royal Caribbean has barred them from casinos, restrooms, and children’s areas, and Samsung has called the privacy situation an “industry-shared problem” requiring a collective fix.
The glasses were originally targeted for introduction later this year under the N50 code name, but Apple delayed the timeline partly to refine its privacy message. The company knows from experience that good intentions do not prevent misuse: its AirTags, designed to locate belongings, quickly became associated with stalking. Camera-equipped glasses will inevitably face similar problems, and Apple will likely spend years updating software and working with regulators to address them.
The first half of 2026 has been marked by waves of economic uncertainty. From fuel prices to inflation to market dives, here’s why leaders should stay flexible as they prepare for the uncertain months ahead.
Furthermore, it has been marked by significant economic volatility. Business leaders have had to navigate a uniquely unpredictable market defined by wild swings in gas prices, better-than-expected inflation readings, jumpy consumer behavior and jittery markets.
Close up crypto trading,Photo by Rafael Minguet Delgado
As leaders look to the months ahead, they are bracing for more volatility. Here’s a quick snapshot of the past six months and a look at how flexibility will define success in the latter half of 2026.
In 2025, EY noted that fuel would be a difficult area of the economy to prepare for in the short term. While some market conditions appeared favorable, EY also noted that the global nature of the oil, gas and chemicals sector continued to create uncertainty.
In 2026, that prediction has been proven true more than once. By March, gas prices jumped sharply in reaction to global supply concerns. Crude oil prices rose quickly, pushing prices at the pump from $2.98 per gallon of regular gasoline in late February to $4.08 per gallon on April 2, more than a dollar in just over a month.
Easing tensions in late spring led to a quick drop as supply fears faded. All seemed to be heading back to normal. But by mid-summer, prices were on the rise again as potential oil supply chain disruptions once again became a topic of concern.
While there is no clear indicator of what is to come next, a year ago EY was already saying that companies will face a degree of uncertainty that will be higher than has been seen in several years. This won’t necessarily lead to higher fuel prices and less activity in the latter half of 2026. But it is a distinct possibility, and businesses are clearly bracing for the unknown.
EY added that even in the oil, gas and chemicals sector itself, businesses are looking for ways to manage the uncertainty. Mergers and acquisitions will likely continue, fueled by companies looking for cost advantages that reinforce their ability to survive economic downturns.
While gasoline prices have a trickle-down effect on the global economy, there are other factors that are exacerbating the current state of the economy, as well. Once again, these are a melting pot of good and bad news that is making it increasingly difficult for leaders to predict what comes next.
For example, in June, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) reading dropped by 0.4%. This brought the annual inflation rate down to a less-than-expected 3.5% reading. This was pleasant news for consumers and business owners alike.
Despite the good news, a simultaneous tech sell-off in June hit stocks hard. The tech sector was particularly vulnerable, and in a single day early in the month, the Nasdaq dropped by 4.1%, resulting in the loss of an entire month of gains. The sell-off has continued in fits and starts, and as of this writing, even the much-lauded ticker for an industry-leading space company has dropped below its IPO price within weeks of meteoric initial gains.
The one predictable thing in the current economy is that nothing is consistent. Good news and bad news are balanced, pulling markets in different directions and leaving many businesses bracing for more economic volatility in the months to come.
The hardest part of the equation is the fact that few, if any, of these developments are actually resolved. Gas prices, for instance, could continue to rise, limiting consumer spending. But they could also find relief if geopolitical tensions ease again. If that were to happen, it could open opportunities for businesses to take advantage of improved consumer sentiment.
The real factor all business leaders should be investing in isn’t predicting an accurate roadmap for the next few months. Instead, they should be investing in adaptability, resiliency and contingency plans. The more leaders can maintain a degree of flexibility through things like cash savings and flexible decision-making, the more likely they will be to make the most of the months ahead.
The eventual launch of Apple Glass is still expected in 2027, but based on how people distrust Meta’s smart glasses, Apple may have a challenge ahead of it.
Smart glasses have been rumored to be in development at Apple for quite a while, and aren’t expected to emerge from Cupertino anytime soon. But, when Apple actually does ship them, it will have to deal with the problem of privacy.
In Sunday’s “Power On” newsletter for Bloomberg, Mark Gurman discusses the privacy implications of smart glasses. Specifically how Apple must work hard to counter the distrust of consumers who are jaded by versions sold by Meta.
Apple will be introducing its first smart glasses at WWDC in 2027, Gurman writes, followed by a consumer release by the end of the year. The summer launch is intended to give developers an opportunity to start building apps before the public gets a chance to buy the hardware.
It’s apparently taken so long to get the glasses ready because Apple is concerned with how it maintains its image of maintaining privacy. Something both the engineering and marketing teams at Apple are working on.
While Apple’s Vision hardware group insists privacy is the top priority, it has to contend with what’s already on the market. When it comes to smart glasses, that means the releases from Meta.
Though Meta does get some credit for being a commercial success when it comes to smart glasses, it’s only part of the story. Meta’s reputation for failing when it comes to privacy protection has become an anchor around its neck.
This has had the result of poisoning the well when it comes to consumers. People are not content with being around people wearing cameras on their head, due to the possibility of being recorded while conducting everyday activities in public.
While the world is used to smartphone cameras being a problem, the stealthy nature makes smart glasses seem worse to consumers. Meta has worked to ally those privacy fears, including using an indicator light that disables recording if it’s been tampered with by the user.
Apple wants to include similar protections, but it does so with a reputation for privacy to uphold. While it could use the same privacy-forward messaging, Apple is also going to try to distinguish itself from rivals in various ways.
The favoring of on-device processing and avoiding features like facial recognition or Meta’s “super-sensing” mode should help Apple. Add in a pledge not to use the cameras or recordings for AI model training and steering clear of using third-party contractors to review footage could help too.
Apple’s also working on a number of hardware and software-based privacy features, with the glasses in mind.
There’s also the prospect of Apple eliminating the camera element, and instead providing access to AI features, calls, and audio without visual assistance. Apple has apparently already prototyped something similar.
Executives have considered the possibility of including cameras, but just for the AI tools to see the world.
This would be similar to the idea of external cameras on the rumored AirPods Pro, so AI can identify real-world items and mention environmental elements to the user. Not for users to take photographs or videos at all.
Apple has a tough challenge ahead of it in convincing the world that its smart glasses aren’t privacy-destroying devices. At least the company has a year to refine its plan before it needs to brace the users for the release.
It isn’t unusual for carmakers to launch new models or even new sub-brands in an attempt to push their lineup upmarket. Relaunching an entire brand to push upmarket is another matter entirely, but that’s exactly what Jaguar is currently in the process of doing. Sales of its existing models were slow, so Jaguar wiped the slate clean and is now replacing its entire lineup with the all-new Type 00 EV.
To say the Type 00 has proved polarizing would be an understatement. Its unusual design attracted a huge wave of criticism, although plenty of people eventually came around to the car’s looks. At the time of writing, it remains to be seen whether or not this unprecedented gamble will pay off, but given the controversy surrounding the design of Jaguar’s new-era electric GT, it seems like a great time to look back at some of the brand’s coolest designs to date.
About a decade before Jaguar staked its future on large, luxury all-electric GTs, it previewed a car that could have seen the company head down a very different path. The CX-75 is arguably one of the biggest what-ifs in Jaguar’s history, and it has continued to attract plenty of attention from both enthusiasts and collectors even 15 years after its unveiling. The first CX-75 concept car broke cover in 2010, and by 2012, Jaguar had built several fully working prototypes with assistance from Williams Advanced Engineering.
The car was unlike anything Jaguar had built before, with an F1-inspired powertrain and a carbon monocoque chassis. Its 1.6-liter gas engine produced 500 horsepower and it was assisted by electric motors that pushed its top speed to over 200 mph. Jaguar executives greenlit the car for production in 2011, only to backtrack a year later and scrap the project entirely. Speaking to Autocar at the time, brand director Adrian Hallmark blamed the economy, saying that “we feel we could make the car work, but looking at the global austerity measures in place now, it seems the wrong time to launch an £800,000 to £1 million supercar.”
Although it never reached production, the CX-75 did end up featuring in the James Bond movie “Spectre.” Seven replica cars were built for filming, albeit with a 5.0-liter supercharged V8 engine rather than the complex F1-style hybrid system of the planned production car. Former Jaguar chief designer Ian Callum also built a one-off road legal CX-75 from a former stunt car, unveiling it in 2024.
One of the most commonly repeated pieces of trivia about the Jaguar E-Type is that Enzo Ferrari once called it the most beautiful car in the world. Whether Ferrari actually ever uttered those exact words is debated, since the only surviving accounts of his quote come from people who allegedly overheard them at the 1961 Geneva Auto Show. Either way, Ferrari was clearly impressed with the Jaguar when he first saw it, and it hasn’t lost any of its charm in the intervening decades between then and now.
While the original Series I design is arguably still the most iconic, Jaguar continually tweaked the car over the course of its production. It also boosted the car’s power output to keep it competitive with its ever-changing roster of competitors. The car proved hugely popular with celebrities and collectors when it launched, and it remains that way today. Many high-profile collectors like Jay Leno have their own restored E-Types, and the most pristine examples can fetch more than $200,000 at auction.
Designing a follow-up to an icon like the E-Type was always going to be a difficult task. It didn’t help that the XJS (initially known as the XJ-S) was a different kind of car to its predecessor, focusing more on luxury cruising than traditional sporting prowess. Like many Jaguars since, the XJS also suffered from build quality issues, and it developed a reputation for being especially difficult to maintain and repair.
Its mixed reputation kept prices for used examples low for decades, but in recent years, the XJS has started to gain increasing momentum as a collectors’ car. Prices are up and interest in restomods like the TWR Supercat is high, with V12-engined versions carrying a premium.
In recent decades, V12 engines in general have become increasingly rare, and it certainly helps that the XJS’ looks have aged much better than most of its mechanical components. Less well looked after examples still have a tendency to fall apart and rack up eye-watering repair bills as a result, but when they’re working, few other cars at their price point offer the same combination of power, sophistication, and style.
The original F-Type was already a good-looking car, but Jaguar added in some extra design touches from the Le Mans-winning D-Type when it launched the F-Type Project 7. The graphics on the front and side are a tribute to the classic racer, as is its lack of a roof. It does technically come with a removable soft top, but it can only be used at lower speeds. That makes it highly impractical for the wet, windy British weather that usually blankets the country during the winter months, but the Project 7 was never meant for daily use.
Unlike the regular F-Type, the Project 7 was designed more for the track than the road. It was priced like an exclusive track day toy, too, with a retail price of £135,000 at launch, equivalent to around $214,000 at the time. Its 567 horsepower V8 engine wasn’t much more powerful than an F-Type R, but with a production run of just 250 examples, it was far more rare than any other F-Type variant. Arguably, it looked better than all of them too, with its classic racer-inspired design elements being blended with cutting-edge aero and carbon-ceramic brakes.
Alongside the E-Type, the XK120 is one of the most instantly recognizable cars in Jaguar’s history. It was first unveiled in 1948 and takes its name from the XK engine under its hood and its claimed top speed. In the end, it turned out to be even faster than its 120 mph claim, reaching 126.448 mph in testing. That was a record for a production car at the time, and it made what was already a very desirable car even more appealing to buyers.
Jaguar originally intended to build only 200 examples of the car, but it became so popular that more than 12,000 examples were eventually sold. The last example left the factory in 1954, with the car’s replacement, the XK140, debuting shortly after. The XK140 featured heavier bumpers to meet the demands of the U.S. market, as well as a new grille. Although it was a more capable car, it’s arguably not quite as good looking as the original XK120.
Before the F-Type came along, there was the XK grand tourer. In top-spec XKR-S form, it featured a supercharged V8 engine with around 540 horsepower on tap. It was relatively under-the-radar compared to most of its competition, but still had plenty of appeal to those in the know. To celebrate the end of its production run, Jaguar gave the car a racing-inspired makeover, and the result was the limited-edition XKR-S GT.
It was described by Jaguar at launch as being “the ultimate track‑focused but road‑going iteration of the XK,” with a laundry list of changes compared to the regular XKR-S. The rear wing and additional aero bits were the biggest visual differences, but Jaguar’s engineers also created a bespoke suspension for the car, as well as adding new carbon-ceramic brakes, revised steering, and plenty of other smaller tweaks.
To reduce the car’s weight, Jaguar also removed the car’s rear seats, and swapped the front seats to racing-style bucket seats. One of the few things that wasn’t changed was the supercharged V8, although it sounded even better thanks to the reduced soundproofing in the XKR-S GT. These alterations helped make the car far more expensive than its series-production counterparts, and it was much rarer too. Jaguar built 30 examples for the U.S. market out of a total of 50 cars, and charged around $175,000 for the privilege of owning one.
Today, Jaguar’s only global-level motorsports team competes in Formula E, but historically, it has been most closely associated with endurance racing. The company won the 24 Hours of Le Mans seven times, making it the fourth most successful brand in the race’s history. Only Ferrari, Audi, and Porsche have more overall wins. The first Le Mans-winning Jaguar was the C-Type, which took the crown in 1951.
The car was designed using a mix of brand new parts and parts borrowed from the XK120. Its engine and transmission both came from the latter, but its bodywork was all-new. Its shape was the work of Malcolm Sayer, a former aircraft designer who, before he was commissioned to work on the C-Type, had just returned from Baghdad University in Iraq.
According to historian Philip Porter as reported by the BBC, it was during this time teaching in Baghdad that Sayer met a German professor who taught him “a system of designing shapes mathematically” that he’d subsequently employ when designing the C-Type. Sayer later played a key role in designing both the D-Type and E-Type. He reportedly never cared much for the aesthetics of his cars, instead preferring to focus on their aerodynamic efficiency. Nonetheless, the C-Type and its successors are arguably among the best looking cars of their respective eras, as well as being fiercely competitive on track.
One of Jaguar’s best-known classics is the Mark II, which was produced between 1959 and 1967. Rather than being an all-new car, it was instead a facelift of the brand’s older saloons, which are collectively known today as Mark I models. The Mark II was a significant improvement over its predecessors both in looks and in performance, and it was far more popular with buyers.
It’s still a favorite among collectors who like to regularly drive their cars, because it’s both comfortable and fast by the standards of the era. Decades after its unveiling, in 1993, the Mark II’s design became the subject of an unusual tribute, when Japanese boutique carmaker Mitsuoka borrowed its looks for its Viewt city car. It is, to put it nicely, a bit of a head-scratcher.
Bizarrely, the Viewt was based on the JDM Nissan Micra, and only produced a little over 100 horsepower. That means a well-specified Mark II, particularly one with the 220 horsepower 3.8-liter six-cylinder engine, would still be able to comfortably outpace a Viewt, despite being roughly half a century older than its cheap Japanese imitator.
Long before the CX-75, Jaguar built another forward-thinking prototype that never ended up making it to production. The XK180 was built in 1998 to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the XK120, and it took design inspiration from Jaguar’s legendary C-Type and D-Type. The company even used the same panel supplier for the XK180 as it did for its Le Mans-winning race cars. Two prototypes were constructed, with one being right-hand drive and the other being left-hand drive. The left-hand drive prototype was sent off to be showcased in the U.S., while the other stayed in the U.K.
Under the hood of the XK180 was a 4.0-liter supercharged V8 engine, which had been borrowed from the XKR and tweaked to be substantially more powerful. With 450 horsepower on tap, the car had around 70 extra horses compared to Ferrari’s V8 supercar of the era, the F355. It’s not clear how much faster than the Ferrari it would have been, though, since Jaguar never released official performance figures for the car.
Several journalists, including Top Gear’s Jeremy Clarkson, were given the keys to the XK180 to show off its capabilities. Despite its publicity drive, Jaguar never considered the car for production. The XJ220, launched around half a decade before, had proved to be much harder to sell than Jaguar had anticipated. Its poor sales meant there simply wasn’t enough development budget left for the brand to make the XK180 a production reality.
By the time it reached the end of its production run, the XJS was getting long in the tooth. Its successor, the X100 generation XK, was a much more modern car, with sleek bodywork and a brand-new V8 engine. It first debuted in 1996, and it would take another two years for the faster, more aggressive-looking XKR to arrive in dealerships.
At launch, the XKR made 370 horsepower, but later models pushed that figure up to roughly 400 hp. Alongside its power boost, the XKR also featured various exterior tweaks, as well as larger wheels.
It served as Jaguar’s range-topping performance car — when it worked, of course. Earlier models suffered engine issues thanks to the Nikasil that lined the cylinders, with the engine failing altogether in extreme cases. That patchy reputation has helped keep used prices down compared to many of its rivals from the era.
Fresh off the glory of two wins at Le Mans with the C-Type, Jaguar engineers developed the follow-up using a similar formula. Much like the C-Type, the D-Type used a revised version of the XK engine that was initially launched in the XK120. It was paired with a lighter chassis and the most aerodynamic bodywork that Jaguar could accommodate, then sent straight back to Le Mans for testing.
The C-Type took its Le Mans wins in 1951 and 1953, with the D-Type’s first win arriving in 1955. It won again in 1956 and 1957, making it even more successful than its predecessor. Further adding to its trophy cabinet, the D-Type also took wins at Spa, Silverstone, and Sebring, among others. Despite being a cutting-edge race car, Jaguar wasn’t choosy about who could own a D-Type. It was available in the brand’s dealerships alongside its other models, and it retailed for a low £1,895, which meant Jaguar took a loss on every D-Type it sold.
The regular Jaguar XE is not an especially interesting car. It’s an entry-level luxury sedan that competes against the likes of the BMW 3-Series and Mercedes-Benz C-Class, and it never made much of an impact against its class-leading German rivals. But the XE SV Project 8 is a very different beast.
Jaguar handed an XE to its engineers and instructed them to turn it into a Nordschleife-conquering track car, and so they fitted it with a V8 engine that churned out around 600 horsepower. Then, they stripped out anything that they could to reduce its weight and fitted a motorsport-derived suspension and an all-wheel drive system.
After adding in carbon fiber racing seats, carbon-ceramic brakes, and a huge rear wing, they sent it round the Nordschleife and promptly achieved the lap record for a four-door sedan. The car was put into limited production so that wealthy owners could see what all the fuss was about. In total, just 300 examples were built.
Jaguar’s XJ220 supercar holds the unusual distinction of both being a ground-breaking world record holder and also not living up to buyers’ expectations. It achieved a Guinness World Record for the fastest production car, hitting 217.1 mph, slightly short of its original 220 mph goal. It’s also rare, with just 282 examples built. That wasn’t a deliberate move on Jaguar’s part though. Originally, the plan was to sell 350 examples, but with such low demand from buyers, Jaguar ended production early.
The lack of demand mostly stemmed from the differences between the XJ220 concept and the production version. The concept featured a 6.2-liter V12 engine, while the production version borrowed a 3.5-liter V6 engine from the MG Metro 6R4 rally car. The concept also included all-wheel drive, active aero, and adjustable suspension, none of which were present in the production version. It was still an incredibly fast and very good-looking car, just not quite as ground-breaking as Jaguar initially promised.
After proving itself as a force to be reckoned with at Le Mans in the ’50s, it would take Jaguar several decades to once again take the winner’s crown. Its sixth win would arrive courtesy of the XJR-9 in 1988, but in between those two winning eras, Jaguar developed the XJ13.
It was originally intended to mark Jaguar’s return to Le Mans, but it never ended up making it to the start line. Development took longer than initially planned, and Le Mans homologation rules changed during that time.
Jaguar would have needed to build 50 production cars in order to enter the XJ13, which wasn’t a financially viable option for the cash-strapped company. And anyway, rival carmakers like Porsche and Ferrari had already developed faster race cars in the time between the start of the XJ13’s development and its completion. As a result, the XJ13 was shelved, with only one, stunning prototype ever built.
A few years before the XJ220 concept took collectors by storm, the lesser-known XJR-15 supercar was Jaguar’s apex predator. In total, around 50 examples were built, but only 27 were road legal. Unlike the XJ220, the production XJR-15 featured a V12 engine under its sleek bodywork, as well as a cutting-edge carbon fiber chassis.
Confusingly, the Jaguar XJR-15 was not actually built by Jaguar. It was instead built by Jaguar Sport, a subsidiary of Tom Walkinshaw Racing. Walkinshaw wanted a road-legal version of the Le Mans-winning XJR-9, and so set about building one without asking Jaguar first.
Jaguar was quietly developing the XJ220 at the time, but allowed the XJR-15 to go ahead on the basis that it would be used for a racing series. TWR subsequently obliged and created a one-make series specifically for the XJR-15. The roadgoing version was essentially a race car with the bare minimum changes needed to get a license plate, making it one of the most extreme Jaguar-badged cars ever, as well as one of the coolest.
Weekend Open Thread: Brooks Brothers
Big Money Is Entering XRP
Grayscale Files For Worldcoin ETF, WLD Registers Sharp Rise
Sail Virtually Aboard The “Itanic” With IA-64 Emulator
Turtle Beach Command Series KB7 review: a nifty screen-equipped gaming keyboard
Unregistered fitter used Gas Safe logo on business flyers
New Jersey voter registration controversy explained: How 6,600 noncitizens got on the rolls, and what happens next
Johnny Depp’s R-Rated Gothic Cult Classic Gets New Release Ahead of Sydney Sweeney Remake
Watch Flock Safety CEO Garrett Langley discuss the future of surveillance at TechCrunch Disrupt 2026
Ethics, other provisions in crypto Clarity Act to be further discussed
Shanghai science forum photos show China’s AI and robotics advances in rivalry with US
Circle’s President Sold Over 360,000 Shares, The Filings Explain Why
Subway Sandwich Computers Get a Second Life as Gaming Machines
The Peugeot Family: How 200 Years of an “Old Money” Dynasty Died in A Boardroom
2026 3M Open leaderboard: Scottie Scheffler finds putter in Round 1, sits three back
How To Use Claude’s Reflect Dashboard And Learn When It’s Time To Touch Grass
16 Dresses for the High Summer Event
Stephen Colbert Returns to Social Media After Late Show End
The 35 Best Board Games for Family Game Night
Andrew Cuomo joins OKX board as crypto exchange expands in U.S.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login