Connect with us

Business

Married vs Single: Who Actually Gambles More?

Published

on

A happy couple with the woman holding on to the

Many people assume single people gamble more. The usual story sounds reasonable: fewer household demands, more freedom to make their own choices, and fewer people watching what they do. It makes sense in theory, but the research doesn’t line up with that picture.

The twist is that marriage often appears to act as a protective factor, while divorce or separation can mark a period where gambling risk rises. Consequently, the relationship between gambling and relationship status is less about being single or married and more about how major life circumstances can influence gambling behaviour.

The Surprising Disconnect between Marriage and Gambling Behaviour

As online gambling has become more accessible through platforms such as VoltRush, discussions about who gambles the most have become increasingly common. One assumption that often surfaces is that relationship status can predict gambling behaviour.

In reality, there is no widely available Australian dataset that directly compares gambling participation or gambling-related harm by marital status. That makes it difficult to draw meaningful conclusions about whether married or single Australians gamble more. Instead, broader demographic factors, including age, gender, and socioeconomic circumstances, provide a much clearer picture of gambling participation.

Advertisement

Why the Single-Person Stereotype Continues

The idea that singles gamble more has remained popular because it connects gambling with independence and free time. Someone living alone may appear to have fewer external influences on their decisions. They may have fewer conversations about their habits, fewer shared routines, or fewer outside checks on their entertainment choices. However, someone’s relationship status does not reveal their financial situation, gambling habits, or level of risk.

This means a divorced person, a married person, and a single person may all have very different experiences despite their relationship labels. For casino-related discussions around brands like VoltRush, the more useful question is not if someone is married or single. It is how gambling fits into their wider life and whether it remains balanced.

Australia’s Gambling Picture Tells a Different Story

Australian participation patterns show a clear gender gap, highlighting that factors beyond relationship status can strongly influence gambling participation. Men participate in gambling at substantially higher rates than women, with some measures showing male participation at around three times the female rate.

Age is another important factor. According to research findings published by Roy Morgan Research, nearly a fifth, or 17.5%, of Australians aged 65 and above play pokies, clearly higher than any other age group. Older adults are also more likely than younger adults to have been married at some point, although age groups include a range of relationship statuses. Together, these patterns highlight how demographic trends play a significant role in gambling participation across Australia.

Advertisement

State Differences: NT and WA Show Different Patterns

Australia’s states and territories also show that gambling behaviour varies by location. The Northern Territory has recorded some of the highest levels of pokies participation in Australia, while Western Australia has recorded lower pokies participation compared with many other jurisdictions. These differences demonstrate that gambling behaviour is influenced by local patterns, population characteristics, and the types of gambling activities that are common in each area.

Different Gambling Activities Attract Different Participants

One additional challenge in comparing gambling behaviour by relationship status is that gambling is not a single, uniform activity. Rather, it encompasses a range of distinct products, including pokies, lotteries, sports betting, racing wagering, and online casino games on platforms such as VoltRush. Each product tends to attract different demographic profiles and participation patterns, which makes broad comparisons by relationship status less reliable.

For example, lotteries typically draw a broad cross‑section of the population, whereas sports betting has historically been more prevalent among younger men. Pokies, by contrast, are particularly popular with older Australians. These differences mean that an individual who occasionally purchases a lottery ticket is engaged in a different pattern of gambling behaviour from someone who regularly sports bets or plays pokies. Here is how they look:

Gambling activity Participation pattern What to keep in mind
Pokies Particularly popular among older Australians. Older age groups have different demographic characteristics, making simple marital-status comparisons less meaningful.
Lotteries Played by a broad cross-section of adults. Wide participation means players come from many different ages and relationship backgrounds.
Sports betting Traditionally more popular among men, particularly younger adults. Gender and age may influence participation more strongly than relationship status.
Horse and greyhound racing Appeals to a mix of regular and occasional bettors. Participation often depends on personal interest and betting preferences rather than relationship status.
Online casino games Audience varies depending on platform, accessibility, and personal preferences. Online participation can differ from venue-based gambling, making comparisons more difficult.

Understanding these differences helps explain why broad statements about gamblers, especially those based solely on relationship status, can be misleading. Meaningful comparisons require considering demographic factors, the types of gambling people choose, and how frequently they participate.

Advertisement

Relationship Changes May Be a Bigger Warning Point

The strongest message from research is not that marriage prevents gambling problems. Rather, major relationship changes deserve closer attention. Divorce or separation can involve changes to living arrangements, routines, social connections, and emotional well-being. These transitions may coincide with periods where some people are more vulnerable to developing harmful gambling patterns.

While marriage may provide some protective social factors, it does not remove all risk. Married people can still experience gambling problems, which can impact the relationships, while single people can have healthy, controlled gambling habits. Therefore, the connection between gambling and personal circumstances is much more complicated than the old assumption that singles simply gamble more.

What This Means for Understanding Gambling Habits

In the end, gambling behaviour is best understood by looking at multiple influences rather than marital status in isolation. A better understanding of someone’s risk of problematic gambling always comes from considering several factors together, including:

  • gender differences
  • age groups
  • relationship changes
  • local participation patterns

Australian data shows clear differences in gambling participation by gender, age, and where people live. But there is no dedicated national dataset that breaks gambling down by married versus single. Therefore, relationship status alone cannot be used as a reliable predictor of who gambles more, especially when examined alongside broader research findings.

Responsible Gambling Reminder

Gambling should be treated as entertainment, not a way to make money. Set limits before you play, stick to your budget, and take a break if it stops being enjoyable.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Bitcoin Steadies Near $64,000 as Crypto Traders Brace for a Pivotal Federal Reserve Rate Decision Today

Published

on

Robinhood logo.

Bitcoin traded at $63,860.26 as of Wednesday afternoon, up a modest $13.14, or roughly 0.02%, as cryptocurrency markets settled into a holding pattern ahead of a Federal Reserve interest rate decision that traders across both traditional and digital asset markets have described as unusually difficult to predict.

Bitcoin opened Wednesday at $63,853.49, up 0.2% from Tuesday’s opening price, before climbing as high as $64,244.18 during the morning session, according to pricing data. The cryptocurrency’s relatively flat overall movement Wednesday followed a volatile stretch earlier in the week, including a sharp pullback Tuesday when bitcoin opened 2.5% lower than the previous day, dropping to around $63,327 as investors broadly reduced exposure to riskier assets ahead of the Fed’s two-day policy meeting.

The Federal Reserve’s rate decision, due later Wednesday, has emerged as the dominant catalyst shaping crypto market sentiment this week. According to data from the CME Group’s FedWatch tool, market participants assigned a 35.8% probability to a rate increase following the meeting’s conclusion, up sharply from 25.7% just a week earlier. Separate estimates cited by CoinDesk showed a somewhat different split, with roughly a 70% probability assigned to rates remaining unchanged and a 30% chance of a surprise quarter-point increase. Some analysts have characterized the meeting as among the hardest Fed decisions to forecast in recent years, given the unusual combination of economic signals policymakers are currently weighing.

Ether, the second-largest cryptocurrency by market value, moved somewhat more sharply than bitcoin during the same period. Ethereum opened Wednesday at $1,919.73, up 1.5% from Tuesday’s opening price, before slipping back to $1,904.82 by mid-morning, according to pricing data. Bitcoin and ether moved in opposite directions for stretches of Wednesday’s session, a divergence that market watchers attributed to renewed airstrikes in the Middle East combined with the approaching Fed announcement, both of which have added competing sources of uncertainty for crypto investors this week.

Advertisement

Broader cryptocurrency market data showed modest overall improvement heading into Wednesday. The total global cryptocurrency market capitalization rose 0.4% to reach approximately $2.28 trillion, recovering from a 1.6% decline recorded the previous day, according to data from CoinMarketCap. Bitcoin’s dominance within the broader crypto market held steady at approximately 56.3%, while ether accounted for roughly 10.2% of total market value. Despite the modest recovery in headline prices, a widely tracked measure of investor sentiment, the Fear and Greed Index, remained in “fear” territory at a reading of 28 to 29, reflecting continued caution among traders even as prices stabilized somewhat.

Institutional flows into bitcoin exchange-traded funds showed signs of softening in recent sessions. Spot bitcoin ETFs recorded a net outflow of $11.6 million on July 27, ending a streak of seven consecutive sessions of net inflows, with asset managers BlackRock and Fidelity leading the pullback, according to data on ETF flows. Even so, some corporate treasury activity continued during the same window, with Hyperscale Data disclosing a bitcoin treasury holding of 1,106 bitcoin, valued at approximately $71.7 million, as of July 28, signaling that at least some institutional accumulation of the cryptocurrency has continued despite broader market softness.

Macroeconomic factors beyond the Fed decision have also weighed on crypto sentiment this week. Rising oil prices, driven by renewed hostilities between the United States and Iran, have added to broader inflation concerns across financial markets, a dynamic that traditionally creates headwinds for risk assets including cryptocurrencies. At the same time, a strengthening U.S. dollar has added further pressure, with analysts noting that the combination of higher oil prices and dollar strength has increased overall macro-volatility risk heading into the Fed’s announcement.

Trading data suggested bitcoin has largely oscillated within a defined range in recent sessions, generally trading between roughly $62,700 and $65,500. Some market analysts have pointed to that range as a key technical zone to watch in the near term, with the lower boundary near $62,700 serving as a support level and the $64,500 to $65,500 zone acting as resistance that bitcoin has struggled to convincingly break through in recent trading.

Advertisement

Beyond bitcoin and ether, individual cryptocurrency tokens showed more significant divergence Wednesday. Jupiter, a decentralized finance token, rose nearly 6% to lead gains within a broader recovery among DeFi-focused tokens, while artificial intelligence-linked tokens continued to struggle, with Fetch.ai falling more than 4% on the day as AI-related crypto tokens continued unwinding gains posted the previous month.

Bitcoin’s current price level remains well below its all-time highs reached earlier in the cryptocurrency’s price cycle, though the asset has still posted substantial gains compared with prior years, with its market capitalization standing at approximately $1.27 trillion to $1.33 trillion depending on the specific pricing snapshot used, maintaining its position as by far the largest cryptocurrency by market value, well ahead of ether’s market capitalization of roughly $233 billion.

With the Federal Reserve’s decision expected to be announced later Wednesday, crypto traders and analysts broadly expect increased volatility to follow the announcement, regardless of whether the central bank opts to raise rates, hold steady, or signal a different policy path than markets currently anticipate, given how closely digital asset prices have tracked broader shifts in monetary policy expectations throughout the past several weeks of trading.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Amazon Web Services India net profit jumps over 10-fold to Rs 242 cr in FY26

Published

on

Amazon Web Services India net profit jumps over 10-fold to Rs 242 cr in FY26
Amazon Web Services India Pvt Ltd has reported a more than 10-fold growth in consolidated net profit to Rs 242.8 crore in the financial year 2026, as per a document shared by market intelligence firm Tofler.

The cloud services arm of e-commerce giant Amazon had posted net profit of Rs 23.1 crore in FY25.

​Its consolidated revenue from operations grew by about 21 per cent to Rs 20,225.6 crore in FY26 from Rs 16,744.9 crore in FY25.

AWS, however, reported a decline of around 14 per cent in standalone net profit to Rs 242.4 crore in FY26, compared to Rs 281.5 crore in FY25.

Advertisement

The company’s revenue from operations on a standalone basis grew by 21.4 per cent to Rs 20,225.6 crore during the period under review from Rs 16,659 crore in the year-ago period.


“The company’s total expenses for the fiscal were reported at Rs 19,888 crore (on a standalone basis),” Tofler said.

Continue Reading

Business

Heathrow passengers to foot bill for third runway bidding process

Published

on

Business Live

The initial costs are expected to be recouped through ticket prices

a British Airways plane taking off from Heathrow Airport

A British Airways plane taking off from Heathrow Airport(Image: Daniel Leal-Olivas/PA Wire)

Heathrow will be allowed to pass the enormous bill it has accumulated in preparing its third runway bid on to passengers, the aviation watchdog has confirmed, in a ruling that looks set to cement the airport’s status as the costliest in the world.

The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) ruled that Heathrow Airport Limited (HAL) will be entitled to recoup the £320m it has already spent competing to secure the megaproject contract by increasing the fees attached to travellers’ air fares.

Advertisement

Rival bidder Heathrow West was also granted permission to recover the £4.2m it has so far spent on its own proposal.

The two operators have been competing fiercely to persuade ministers to back their respective third runway plans, assembling extensive planning documents and feasibility studies, while also enlisting the services of expensive third-party advisers to bolster their bids.

For incumbent HAL, that investment has already stretched into the hundreds of millions, the CAA noted, with the hub previously arguing it needs to cover its early outlay if the expansion is to remain financially attractive, reports City AM.

In its ruling, the aviation regulator said without the design and planning efforts both bidders have undertaken to develop credible expansion proposals, the timely delivery of the third runway project would have been put at risk.

Advertisement

It added that both parties would need to demonstrate their claims had been independently scrutinised line by line before being permitted to pass on the costs.

“Our decision strikes a balance between supporting the delivery of benefits to consumers through timely progress on Heathrow expansion, whilst also protecting them from undue increases in costs,” said Tim Johnson, the UK Civil Aviation Authority’s director of consumers and markets.

“The costs Heathrow can recover are capped, independently scrutinised and subject to efficiency reviews, helping ensure that passengers only pay for efficient costs that are justified.”

Under the compensation scheme, agreed following a consultation held last year, HAL will be permitted to add 10p to every passenger fare over the next 20 to 25 years. It will also be responsible for recouping Heathrow West’s more modest costs, should the rival bid led by hotel magnate Surinder Arora fail to succeed.

Advertisement

The CAA reached its decision alongside a wide-ranging review of Heathrow’s overarching regulatory framework, in which it will determine whether rival operators will be permitted to own and run key infrastructure within the airport.

Airlines operating at the hub have grown increasingly frustrated with the exorbitant charges they are forced to pass on to passengers, and – in lockstep with Arora – some have established a pressure group lobbying for a wholesale shake-up of red tape at the airport.

At £28.80, the airport’s charges are already the costliest in the world, and are anticipated to climb by as much as £50 once the full expenditure of the third runway is factored in.

Wednesday’s CAA ruling will see the airport charge per passenger rise by approximately 15 pence in 2028, climbing to 30 pence in subsequent years.

Advertisement

The initial costs incurred by bidders are expected to be recouped through ticket prices over a period of roughly 20 to 25 years.

Continue Reading

Business

Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) Q4 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Published

on

OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript