The plans could extend a Cambridgeshire city
Plans could see more than 1,600 homes built to extend Ely. Network Rail has raised “significant concerns” about the proposals, saying the potential increased use of level crossings could introduce “additional safety risk”.
The Church Commissioners for England, which manages the Church of England’s investment portfolio, has submitted plans for up to 1,607 new homes in Ely. The plans are for land at High Flyer Farm on the north of Apollo Chase.
They also propose an extension to Ely Country Park and a community allotment or orchard, as well as an extension to the Chettisham Business Park. The site covers 85.21 hectares.
The applicant said: “The redevelopment of the site will contribute towards meeting the council’s housing requirements within the planned growth strategy for Ely, delivering a range of homes including affordable housing to meet local needs, alongside significant publicly accessible open space and landscape enhancement.”
They added that the plans would aim to create an “attractive, distinctive and inclusive new neighbourhood of exemplary design quality”.
The plans form part of the larger Ely1 allocation in the East Cambridgeshire District Council Local Plan for 2015, covering around 210 hectares of land and plans for up to 3,000 homes. The applicant also proposes to build two new primary schools and two local centres to “incorporate retail and community facilities”.
Concerns have been raised since the plans were submitted to East Cambridgeshire District Council in July. A member of the public said the development seems to be “focusing on just cramming more housing onto land”, which they see as “critical for future food production”.
The objector said: “We have had multiple developments built within the last twenty or so years at the expense of good quality arable farm land. Seen previous developers promise infrastructure improvements and nothing ever comes of it.” They urged to “put the brakes on this development until Ely can support it properly on non arable farm land and infrastructure to support”.
Due to the scale of the scheme, its proximity to operational railway infrastructure, the potential increase in rail demand, and the “likely impacts” on nearby level crossings, Network Rail has raised “significant concerns regarding the safety and operation of the railway network”.
The comment put forward by Network Rail states: “Given the scale of the proposal, comprising up to 1,607 dwellings, Network Rail considers that the development would generate a significant increase in pedestrian, cyclist and equestrian movements across these level crossings.
“Increased use of level crossings introduces additional safety risk and is contrary to Network Rail’s long-term objective of reducing, and where possible eliminating, level crossing use.”
Network Rail has put forward “suitable mitigation” that should be secured. This includes the provision of a grade-separated bridleway bridge across the railway, replacing the function currently served by the Clayway and Second Drove level crossings, which would aim to provide a safer crossing point for non-motorised users while reducing level crossing risk.
In a separate issue, another member of the public said that there “needs to be much more greenery” leading to the Chettisham boundary to make the Ely Country Park extension “a true country park that is additive to the local landscape”.
The objector added: “Chettisham must remain a separate entity to the city and not become part of the general urban sprawl; this can be achieved by adding a much more expansive green space, protecting biodiversity.”




You must be logged in to post a comment Login