Funerals have taken place for two Palestinian teenagers who were shot dead this week when settlers and soldiers entered a Palestinian village in the occupied West Bank.
The killing of Omar al-Naasan and Khalil Abu Alia comes amid near-daily attacks by Jewish settlers in the village of al-Mughayyir, south of Nablus.
“We expect that when our sons walk in the street, they are likely to return to you injured or killed,” Mohammed Al-Naasan, Omar’s father, told the BBC.
Israel’s military says it fired on “instigators of a violent riot” and that the incident is under review.
Advertisement
The United Nations says more than 80 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces or settlers in the territory since the beginning of the year.
Unveiling new safety measures across the capital today, the Mayor of London praised Metro’s investigation into an upskirting website showing hundreds of women and girls targeted.
Advertisement
Victims were filmed up close wearing shorts and leggings across London for at least three years, with the website claiming to own 400 videos.
A significant amount of the footage was taken in Stratford, as women shopped in Westfield or walked through the tube station.
But today, Sadiq Khan was in the same area to unveil a £15.6 million fund to improve safety in public spaces.
The fund is targeted specifically at making women feel safer, and includes more lighting in the evening, greenery kept high to stop predators hiding in shrubbery and more CCTV.
Advertisement
It follows Metro’s investigation into an upskirting website, which Mr Khan said left him feeling ‘sickened’.
He said: ‘It is not acceptable to see the website being monetised either. This is why we need to do more to tackle violence against women and girls.’
But istoday’s plan enough to stop the upskirters form targeting more women and girls, let alone more serious attacks in the capital?
A £16.5 million fund for women’s safety
CCTV includes more lighting in the evening, greenery kept high to stop predators hiding in shrubbery and more CCTV (Picture: James Manning/PA Wire)
On a path next to the Olympic Park, large metal orbs have been strung up above the trees. They will emit soft light in the evening to deter predators from attacking under the cover of darkness.
Advertisement
Benches have also been transformed into large ‘sunlounger’ style, to stop anyone approaching from behind. Trees have been trimmed as high as they can, and CCTV cameras sit prominently above everything.
Although this makes the space less ideal for attackers to commit offences, the two men filming for the upskirting website were hardly deterred by lighting and cameras.
Latest London news
To get the latest news from the capital, visit Metro’sLondon news hub.
A women being filmed as she walks out of Stratford Station
Advertisement
All of the videos were taken inside buildings or in broad daylight. Tube stations and Westfield are also covered in CCTV.
They used DJI Osmo Pocket cameras, which fit snugly into the palm of their hands, and followed their victims for minutes at a time amongst hundreds of people.
‘The problem goes to the heart of society’
But what compels people to film vulnerable people from intimate angles in the first place?
Advertisement
In the website uncovered by Metro, there is not only a $50 payment to access all of the footage, but gambling adverts also pop up – meaning the site has been monetised.
Whatever money earned from the site will hardly be enough to live on though. Professor McGlynn suspects the real incentive behind the site is kudos from other men deep within the manosphere.
There are hundreds of videos of women being upskirted on a website uncovered by Metro
Gina Martin, who campaigned for upskirting to be made a specific offence in 2019, agrees.
She said: ‘The reason why I fought fror the legislation in the first place was because it was already an epidemic – this is hardly a new thing.’
Before the invention of smartphones, men would place mirrors on their shoes to look up women’s skirts, Gina said.
Advertisement
‘Women’s bodies are seen as something to be consumed,’ she said. ‘It’s about dominance and power, and the advancement of technology is only incentivising it.’
So, what can actually be done?
But all is not lost. Although lawmakers struggle to keep pace with technology, positive change can happen on a smaller scale.
Professor McGlynn said: ‘If places are willing to adapt and prevent, then you are already in a better spot.’
Another woman being followed and upskirted as she walked out of Statford Station
In Newcastle, the city council dished out Community Protection Warnings to two people who filming vulnerable people on the street.
This included homeless and intoxicated people, which was dubbed as ‘public humiliation for entertainment’.
Advertisement
The warnings stop the two accounts from filming, but can be escalated a formal Community Protection Notice which is a criminal offence to breach.
Professor McGlynn said: ‘So there is something that can be done to have a quick impact. Businesses like Wetherspoons banning Meta glasses is also a positive step which should be followed.’
But the biggest change can come from early intervention. Teaching boys from a young age about misogynistic behaviours can help prevent future criminal behaviour.
Gina said: ‘We need primary prevention, more eduction, and work from institutions to the top level of government.
Advertisement
‘If not, this is going to keep happening, and we will only be responding to crimes after they happen, rather than preventing them.’
Chibueze Chukwurah and Maxwell Uguanya allegedly attacked the man outside the Alpha Lounge.
Two former Aberdeen Uni students have denied murdering a stranger outside a nightclub in London.
Advertisement
Chibueze Chukwurah, 34, and Maxwell Uguanya, 33, also pleaded not guilty to the manslaughter of Taiwo Ekerin after allegedly attacking him outside the Alpha Lounge venue in Lewisham, south-east London, on May 24.
The court heard the pair met one another while they were master’s students at the University of Aberdeen.
Prosecutor Frederick Hookway called the alleged offending “serious impromptu violence which resulted in the death of another”.
Mr Ekerin tragically died in hospital on May 30 and James Manning, defending Chukwurah, told Southwark Crown Court on Friday: “The cause of death isn’t totally clear yet”.
Advertisement
Nigerian national Chukwurah, of Royston Road in Glasgow, worked two jobs including as an agency cleaner after leaving Aberdeen and has been living in the UK on a graduate visa, his defence said.
He travelled to London from Scotland, where he lives and has family, to visit Uguanya, of Enfield, north London, the court heard.
The two men were in the same nightclub as the alleged victim “and his crew” but there was “no particular interaction” between the groups until they left the club at about 4am, the prosecution said.
A dispute allegedly broke out and Chukwurah is accused of striking Mr Ekerin in the head with a punch, causing him to “fall back on the ground”.
Advertisement
“Indeed the defendant never got back up”, Mr Hookway added.
His co-defendant allegedly “then got on top of him” and dealt further blows.
Chukwurah also kicked him whilst he was on the ground, the prosecution claimed.
Mr Manning said “this offence was unplanned and impromptu” and there is no connection between the defendants and the alleged victim.
Advertisement
They are in custody and due to stand trial on February 1 next year.
Get more Daily Record exclusives by signing up for free to Google’s preferred sources. Click HERE.
Greater Manchester Police (GMP) said officers attended following a report of a stabbing at an address on the street.
Click here to get the biggest stories straight to your inbox in our Daily Newsletter
They said they found a man in his late 20s with injuries ‘consistent with a stabbing.’
Advertisement
He was taken to hospital and is currently in a life-threatening condition, the force said.
“No arrests have been made at this stage and investigations are ongoing” they said in a statement.
“We are appealing for information or any CCTV, Dashcam, or Ring doorbell footage to be shared with us, you can do that by contacting us via 101 or at gmp.police.uk, quoting log 565 of 04/09/2026″ they added.
Advertisement
“Alternatively, you can contact the independent charity Crimestoppers, anonymously, on 0800 555 111.”
A cordon has remained in place on the stretch of road outside the Sim-Son convenience store throughout the day.
The Manchester Evening News understands the incident is however unrelated to the store.
Tensions reached a boiling point in the Lindsay Clancy trial on Friday as jurors continued to deliberate, with one holdout refusing to agree with 11 others.
Clancy’s lawyer Kevin Reddington yesterday begged the judge to switch out the holdout juror who, the jury foreperson claims, is refusing to follow the law when it comes to reasonable doubt. The jury, who is made up of nine women and three men, have been deliberating for 36 hours.
It now appears that the juror is certain Clancy is guilty, and is voting that way. Reddington claimed on Thursday that they were doing so despite having ‘reasonable doubt’.
‘That juror told you that he would be able to apply the law to the facts as you asked him, and based on this note from this juror, it clearly and unequivocally indicates that they are basically 11 to one, and this person will not apply reasonable doubt to the evidence to return a not guilty verdict,’ Reddington said in court.
Advertisement
Earlier, the defense lawyer also accused the judge of ‘glossing over the issue’ and being ‘soft’ on the reasonable doubt instruction.
Raising his voice, Judge Sullivan responded: ‘What do you want me to do, get a brass band?’
Clancy is on trial for murdering her three children Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, eight months, at her Duxbury, Massachusetts, home in January 2023.
The former labor and delivery nurse has pleaded not guilty in her case citing postpartum psychosis, and if found not criminally responsible for the three murder charges, she will be sent to a state mental health facility.
Advertisement
Prosecutors acknowledged that Clancy was mentally ill, but maintain that she knew what she was doing at the time of the killings.
Follow the Daily Mail for the latest updates…
Judge and defense attorney get into a fiery exchange
Defense attorney Kevin Reddington accused the judge of ‘glossing over the issue’ and being ‘soft’ on the reasonable doubt instruction.
‘I would ask that you not just give them as I described it yesterday, as a soft inquiry: “Will you listen to my instructions?”‘ Reddington said.
Advertisement
‘I would ask that you specifically direct their attention to proof beyond a reasonable doubt and reinstruct them on that forcefully.’
Judge William Sullivan replied: ‘I think I did that yesterday, didn’t I?’
‘Yes,’ the prosecutor interjected.
Reddington doubled down: ‘You did it yesterday, you did it soft, you didn’t do it forcefully…’
Advertisement
Sullivan jumped in: ‘What do you want me to do, get a brass band?
‘I read the instruction as written. The fact that I perhaps didn’t give it my full inflection – I’m sorry about that. I’m not an actor.’
The judge continued to defend himself: ‘I am not glossing over this issue. Trust me, I’ve been thinking about this for a while. I’ll try to give it with more pizazz.’
Clancy family arrived at court
Clancy’s parents, Mike and Paula Musgrove, and her sister, Allison Ozga, arrived at court together for day seven of verdict deliberations.
Jury brought into courtroom
The jury entered the courtroom.
Judge Sullivan asked his usual questions: whether they had discussed the case and whether anything affected their ability to serve.
Advertisement
He then reminded the jury that they must follow the law as he gave it to them.
‘I wanted to remind you, as I instructed you earlier, it is your duty as jurors to accept the law as I gave it to you,’ Sullivan said.
‘You must follow the law as I give it to you, whether you agree with it or not.
‘With that, you may now resume your deliberations.’
Advertisement
Judge declines to inquire further about holdout juror
Judge William Sullivan declined to pursue any additional inquiry about the holdout juror who refuses to follow the law about reasonable doubt.
‘In this case here, I see no showing of the need for an inquiry of this particular juror,’ he said.
‘The note we’re referring to, the one from late yesterday afternoon, indicates that the juror has acknowledged doubt but has refused to apply it to the verdict.’
Sullivan continued: ‘In reading that note carefully and strictly in the way that I have to before I possibly invade the province of the jury, that note does not indicate that this is a person who has refused to follow the law.
‘This is not a case that there is any indication that the juror has refused to deliberate or has any reason or indicated that they would not follow the law.’
Advertisement
Defense attorney says juror lied under oath
Kevin Reddington claimed the holdout juror lied under oath.
‘Clearly judge, we have a person, who under their oath, stood in front of you yesterday when you did the individual voir dire, and according to this information, under oath, looked you in the eye and lied,’ he said.
‘That juror told you that he would be able to apply the law to the facts as you asked him, and based on this note from this juror, it clearly and unequivocally indicates that they are basically 11 to one, and this person will not apply reasonable doubt to the evidence to return a not guilty verdict.’
Why must jurors return a unanimous verdict?
American juries are not allowed to return majority verdicts in criminal cases after the Supreme Court ruled in 2020 that the practice was unconstitutional.
Before 2020, Louisiana and Oregon allowed majority convictions in criminal trials.
As a result of case Ramos v Louisiana, judges ruled that the Sixth Amendment requires a unanimous jury verdict to convict a defendant of a serious crime.
Advertisement
If a jury cannot reach a unanimous agreement and returns hung, a mistrial is automatically declared.
Court resumes
Court kicked off the morning with the judge asking the attorneys how they wanted to respond to the foreperson’s note.
Prosecutor Sprague said the jury should return to deliberations.
‘What we have here is a note that indicates a disagreement,’ she said.
Inside the courtroom
Lindsay Clancy is inside the courtroom for day seven of her verdict deliberations.
She sits at the defense table in a green blouse.
Advertisement
Her parents, Mike and Paula Musgrove; her sister, Allison Ozga; her nurse friend, Margaret Hamp; along with Dr Paul Zeizel and Reddington’s son, Patrick Reddington, all entered the courtroom.
Who is on the Lindsay Clancy jury?
A panel of 12 jurors is deliberating in a private room on whether they find Lindsay Clancy guilty of first-degree murder, second-degree murder, or manslaughter.
The jury includes nine women and three men. The foreperson is a woman. They have not been sequestered for deliberations.
As of Friday morning, the group has deliberated for 36 hours without reaching a verdict.
On Thursday, the foreperson sent a note to Judge William Sullivan saying that one of the 12 was not following the law on reasonable doubt.
Advertisement
Defense attorney Kevin Reddington filed a motion to have the juror removed and said the judge will question that person Friday morning.
Six alternate jurors have not participated in the deliberations but have sat through the entire trial.
The alternates consist of three men and three women.
Kevin Reddington arrives at court in pink
Kevin Reddington arrived at court with his entourage wearing a pink tie.
Defense files motion to end sidebars
Clancy’s attorney filed a motion Friday morning asking the judge to end sidebars in this trial and to handle all related proceedings in open court.
Defense attorney explains why Clancy was brought up to judge’s bench
Lindsay Clancy was wheeled up to the judge’s bench by her attorney Kevin Reddington on Thursday.
They watched with the prosecution as the judge asked each juror, one by one, whether they could follow the law on reasonable doubt. All 12 were heard agreeing.
Advertisement
As he left court, Reddington explained the decision to bring her up to the bench.
‘I just want to make sure she’s there and understands what’s going on,’ he said.
Share or comment on this article:
Lindsay Clancy judge explodes at her lawyer in furious clash over holdout juror: ‘What do you want me to do!’: Live updates
As Hampshire experiences one of its hottest and driest summers on record, the team at Boundary Lakes Golf Course, located at Utilita Bowl in Southampton, has been working tirelessly behind the scenes to protect the course and maintain the best possible playing conditions for golfers.
Contrary to an earlier eyewitness report, someone who works at the Sim-Son Convenience Store has told our reporter Charlotte that he believes the incident took place at another address nearby or outside.
He said that the incident did not take place inside the shop and that they are waiting to reopen.
Footage showed the defendant helping a crowd to push over a black Vauxhall Astra car before it was set alight
14:01, 04 Sep 2026
Advertisement
A rioter cried in the dock today as he was handed a 27-month sentence for what a judge said was his “full and active part in burning two cars” during public disorder.
Reece Dunnett, 25, of Vorlich Way, Dunfermline in Scotland, had previously pleaded guilty to one charge of rioting and two counts of criminal damage by destroying two cars.
Belfast Crown Court heard rioting erupted across Belfast in August 2024 in reaction to the events in Southport, Liverpool, when three young children were stabbed to death at a Taylor Swift dance-themed workshop.
Prosecution barrister Mark O’Hara played CCTV footage to the court of public disorder which broke out in the Sandy Row/Donegall Road area in south Belfast on August 3, 2024.
Advertisement
He told Judge Gordon Kerr KC that Dunnett was identified from the footage dressed in black shorts and a blue hoodie top with his face concealed.
The footage showed the defendant helping a crowd to push over a black Vauxhall Astra car before it was set alight. Mr O’Hara said Dunnett played a similar role in an attack on a white Suzuki Alto car which was destroyed by fire.
The prosecutor said that during an interview with a probation officer, Dunnett tried to minimise his role, saying he was not involved in causing damage to the cars
Defence barrister Michael Boyd described the rioting as “outrageous”.
Advertisement
“We all saw the footage at the time on the news. What he has pleaded guilty to has clearly crossed the custody threshold,” said Mr Boyd.
“He has accepted his guilt and has accepted his responsibility notwithstanding the silly comments he made to the probation officer.”
He added that Dunnett was working in Northern Ireland at the time of the rioting and got “caught up” in events.
“He has expressed genuine remorse and shame for his offending which has been reflected in the pre-sentence report,” added Mr Boyd.
Advertisement
He described Dunnett’s behaviour on the evening of August 3 as “opportunistic, impulsive and reactive”.
Judge Kerr said Dunnett had been at the scene of public disorder for around two-and-half-hours and played a “full and active part in burning two cars”.
He added: “We have seen on the video some of the activity involved in this case.
“This behaviour took place in August 2024 and there were multiple incidents throughout Belfast in response to events in Southport, Liverpool and Belfast was not the only place affected by this type of behaviour.”’
Advertisement
Judge Kerr said that the prosecution had outlined the expense in terms of police time, resources and damage that was caused throughout the city and that must be considered in the course of sentencing in these types of cases.
“The upshot is that deterrent sentencing is absolutely necessary to make it clear to people that widespread public disorder causing disruption to society, causing damage and injury to police officers, members of the security forces and fire service personnel will not be tolerated,” said Judge Kerr.
“The only way to deal with such persons is by immediate custodial sentences.”
Handing down the 27-month sentence, divided equally between custody and supervised licence, Judge Kerr said it would be up to Dunnett to decide if he wanted to apply to the prison authorities to serve part of his sentence in Scotland “in ease of his family”.
Advertisement
Dunnett started crying in the dock as the sentence was imposed before he was led away in handcuffs by prison staff.
Start now and you could have red-breasted visitors right through winter
If you’re dreaming of a robin popping into your garden like a living Christmas card, the key is to start before winter comes. By putting out the right food and water through early autumn and keeping it up every day, you can teach these red-breasted birds that your garden is a reliable destination.
Advertisement
Wildlife advice says consistency matters most because robins return to places that keep meeting their needs when natural pickings drop. Begin in September and keep going through October and November, and you’ve got a better chance of seeing the same bird come back to eat, drink and maybe even settle nearby, when Christmas arrives.
What should you offer?
The three strongest crowd-pleasers are mealworms (live or dried), suet pellets or balls, and sunflower hearts. Extras like crushed unsalted peanuts and soft fruit (berries, raisins or chopped apple) are also proving popular.
How you present the food is just as important as robins prefer to feed close to the ground rather than from hanging feeders, according to the RSPB. A low or sheltered bird feeder suits them far better, ideally positioned somewhere that predators like cats cannot easily approach undetected, reports the Mirror.
A garden that offers ‘real’ foraging opportunities can be even more tempting than a feeder alone. Leaving a couple of wilder corners encourages worms and beetles, giving robins the kind of hunting they’re built for.
Advertisement
Don’t pile food out like a buffet. Put down only what will be eaten within a day, then reduce the amount if leftovers remain and clear anything that could attract pests.
Water is just as important as snacks once the cold sets in. A clean birdbath topped up regularly helps with drinking and bathing, and some people use a heated option to stop it from freezing solid.
A crucial cleaning component for this task is white vinegar, which most households already stock in their cupboards. The white vinegar approach works perfectly for monthly or seasonal thorough cleans, particularly when dealing with stubborn algae or high bird activity.
Advertisement
If you want more than a quick flying visit, add a nesting option so they’ll consider making your garden their home as well. An open-fronted bird box near ivy or climbing plants can provide cover and a safer place to settle.
One warning before you roll out the welcome mat: robins may look cute, but they can be fiercely territorial. That means a confident newcomer might chase off other birds once it decides the garden is “theirs”.
Don’t expect instant trust on day one. Keep the routine steady, give them space, and over time, you may find a robin following you around while you garden, hoovering up insects you turn up from the soil.
The company’s plans to relocate last year ‘fell through’ as it was ‘no longer affordable’ for them
A landmark Cambridge business has been sold more than a year after its plans to relocate “fell through”. Marshalls Aerospace, based at Cambridge Airport, had announced plans to relocate to Cranfield University’s base in Bedford.
Advertisement
However, the company announced last year that these plans “fell through” as it was “no longer affordable”. Marshalls has now confirmed the company has been sold to the Aurelius Group.
A Marshalls Aerospace spokesperson said: “Marshalls has been going through a wider, deliberate transition as a group, with a longstanding plan that Marshall Aerospace would relocate from the Cambridge Airport site.
“We’ve been exploring options to secure the best possible long-term future for the Aerospace business, with a focus on ensuring a stable and sustainable future for its people and operations.
“The group has now entered into an agreement to sell Marshall Aerospace, in its entirety, to Aurelius Group. Aurelius is well positioned to support the aerospace business through its next stage of development.
Advertisement
“The acquisition is now subject to UK government review under the terms of the National Security and Investment Act, which is currently underway. Final Marshall Group shareholder approval and Austrian antitrust approval are also necessary.”
Marshalls expects the transaction to be completed by late September.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login