Connect with us

Politics

Politics Home | TUC Head Urges Government To Reject Choice Between Defence Spending And Public Services

Published

on

TUC Head Urges Government To Reject Choice Between Defence Spending And Public Services
TUC Head Urges Government To Reject Choice Between Defence Spending And Public Services

Paul Nowak, general secretary of the Trades Union Congress, addressing a rally in 2023 (Alamy)


6 min read

Paul Nowak, general secretary of the Trades Union Congress (TUC), has urged the government to “reject the right-wing argument” that there is a choice to be made between increasing defence spending and investing in public services.

Advertisement

Speaking ahead of the TUC conference that begins on Sunday, Nowak told PoliticsHome: “We should fundamentally reject the right-wing argument that somehow it is a choice between investing in our national and collective security, and investing in our schools and hospitals and infrastructure. I just reject that choice out of hand.”

Andy Burnham told MPs at Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday: “Yes, we do everything to support our national security, but it can’t come at the expense of social security.” 

Although the Prime Minister restated the government’s commitment to defence as “absolute”, his comments were criticised by the Conservatives, who accused him of “prioritising the ballooning benefits bill over our national security”.

Advertisement

The TUC passed a “Wages not weapons” motion at its conference last year, which opposed immediate rises in defence spending and noted that “in the current political context, ever-higher expenditure on arms will inevitably mean less money for our education, health, and councils, and the green transition”.

Asked whether he had since been lobbying the government not to increase defence spend, Nowak replied: “That wasn’t what we agreed last year, and I, the TUC, we are not going to campaign on ‘this is the right level of spending on defence’. I’m not a defence expert.”

Trade unions including the University and College Union (UCU), which proposed the motion at TUC last year, would like to see a clearer position against government increases to military budgets.

Advertisement

UCU general secretary Jo Grady said: “TUC policy is clear and we will be looking to reaffirm that this year via the unions movement’s democratic processes. We would then expect the TUC to fully support the democratic will of the movement.”


In a wide-ranging interview, Nowak – who is from Merseyside – welcomed Burnham as Prime Minister, joking: “I’m always keen to see Evertonians in positions of power… We’re finally getting the recognition on the international stage that we deserve.”

He said that under Keir Starmer’s leadership trade unions had a “sense” of “being managed as political stakeholders” by the government, but with Burnham at the helm he hoped “unions feel that this is a government that sees them as legitimate partners”.

Nowak warned Burnham against calling a general election before the Employment Rights Act changes are implemented, however.

Advertisement

The union leader described himself as “pretty agnostic” about the possibility of an early snap election, but added: “Do I think that the public is champing at the bit for another general election? I really don’t…

“It’ll be down to Andy Burnham as Prime Minister and his government to think, ‘Have we got enough room for manoeuvre within the manifesto commitments that we’ve got?’

“I certainly think on things like employment rights, for example, there is still a huge amount of unfinished business, and what I wouldn’t want to see is that business remaining unfinished because we had an early general election.”

Nowak said he wanted the Employment Rights Act to be implemented “further and faster”, flagging that “the first big test for the government” will be on guaranteed hours for workers.

Advertisement

“It would be an absolute travesty if we ended up in the situation where people, for example, on nine-hour contracts are excluded from the scope of the guaranteed hours provision,” he said.

“There will be some employers who are just addicted to one-sided flexibility… and they are going to fight tooth and nail against proper right-guaranteed hours. I think the Prime Minister’s got to be prepared to face them down.”

Chancellor John Healey
Novak wants Chancellor John Healey to reform the OBR, describing the independent watchdog as a “tool of austerity” (Alamy)

The TUC general secretary said the other “unfinished business” included “the biggest wave of public sector insourcing”, “the fair pay agreement in social care” and “the school support staff negotiating body”.

He added that the unions are “serious about Employment Rights Act Two” – the demand for a second instalment of the workers’ rights legislation already passed – which he specified should include measures on corporate governance.

“It’s bizarre that 19 European countries have some sort of provision for workers on boards, but we don’t,” he said.

Advertisement

Speaking to PoliticsHome, Nowak also urged Chancellor John Healey ahead of the Budget to give himself “more flexibility to invest in our infrastructure and in public services because we are desperately going to need it”.

The TUC head advised that the bank surcharge should be increased, saying: “If you put it up to 35 per cent – which is the level the Tories put the windfall tax on the energy companies at the height of the energy price spikes – that generates £60bn over the next four years.”

While refusing to “prejudge” the upcoming TUC conference debate on changing the fiscal rules, he called on the government to reform the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), describing the watchdog as being “established by George Osborne as a tool of austerity”.

“I want the remit of the OBR reviewed. I think at the moment it’s acting as a break on growth rather than a driver of growth,” he said.

Advertisement

Nowak also criticised the National Wealth Fund’s aim to break even by 2031, saying: “Infrastructure investments don’t pay off in three or four years, or even five years, or sometimes 10 years… You’ve got to take a much longer-term view.”

And he said the government should ensure that when it takes a stake in a company through GB Energy or the National Wealth Fund, it is counted as a public sector asset – enabling more investment.

The TUC general secretary backed further action on the water industry, including putting Thames Water into special administration.

“Why the hell are we rewarding big outsourcing companies with hundreds of millions of pounds in dividends each and every year when they are failing to deliver our basic public services?” Nowak asked.

Advertisement

“I think especially Thames Water should be placed into a special administrative regime. I am absolutely convinced that that not a single pound of taxpayers’ money or bill payers’ money should be spent on rewarding Thames water shareholders and senior management for continued failure. 

“You’ve got to put in place safeguards for the taxpayer, you’ve got to put in place safeguards for the people reliant on Thames Water services, and you’ve got to put in safeguards for the workforce as well because there’s big issues about pensions and pay. But I don’t think anyone thinks that we should bail them out with another single pound.”

New Environment Secretary Angela Eagle recently said the move would be more complicated than assumed by some activists, saying: “Whatever people think of Thames at the moment, it isn’t technically insolvent.”

 

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Republicans are partying in Dallas. Just don't ask them about affordability.

Published

on

Republicans are partying in Dallas. Just don't ask them about affordability.

DALLAS — Republicans are panicking that President Donald Trump’s policies are drowning out their cost-of-living message — and that it may be too close to the election to fix it.

GOP lawmakers and candidates woke up in Texas on Wednesday to an alarming reality: Trump deepening his trade war with Canada as oil hit $100 per barrel, following new military strikes against Iran.

Publicly, Republicans plan to downplay their latest woes — or blame the Democrats. But several of them at the midterm convention this week are privately strategizing with GOP leaders and Trump administration officials to shore up vulnerable candidates in battlegrounds and in states the president won by double digits in 2024.

Vice President JD Vance is scheduled to address a breakfast Thursday with the delegations from Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan and Wisconsin, where Republicans are eager to hear how he will navigate the party’s economic woes, according to three people with direct knowledge of the matter, granted anonymity to share private plans. Others are pushing to use the convention to reclaim the cost of living issue that’s haunting Republicans after it buoyed them two years ago, planning to argue in their speeches that their party can still be trusted to bring down prices.

Advertisement

In a closed-door meeting Wednesday, a group of top senators and candidates in tough races — including Sen. Jon Husted (R-Ohio), North Carolina Senate nominee Michael Whatley and Georgia Republican Senate nominee Rep. Mike Collins — huddled with leaders from the Senate GOP-aligned super PAC met to discuss a battleground map increasingly under pressure as the party tries to fend off voters’ ire around the economy.

“You can’t hide the fact of what the price of gasoline is, we know that,” Collins told POLITICO in an interview after the closed-door meeting, as he reiterated his support for Trump’s efforts to neutralize Iran as a nuclear threat, arguing that the U.S. has long been at war with Iran but “we’re putting an end to it with this president.”

Many Republicans didn’t want to talk about economic concerns amid the party at the American Airlines Center in Dallas, where MAGA hats cost $47 (a discount from the $55 online) and water went for $8 a bottle.

“We are going the wrong direction,” said one GOP lawmaker attending the convention granted anonymity, like others in this story, to speak candidly of the spiraling economic indicators and the challenges they were creating. “We don’t have a lot of time left.”

Advertisement

Senior Republicans are quietly dismayed about the pileup of Trump economic moves that have rattled voters and key industries in their states — including the worsening trade war with Canada that threatens the auto and farm sectors in the Midwest, his step to import more foreign beef ahead of the midterms that’s infuriated ranchers and farmers from Texas to Iowa, along with spiking oil prices amid the war in Iran that are cutting across the map.

“We’re putting Iowa in play,” one frustrated senior House Republican said on the sidelines of the convention of the Senate map. “We’re putting Texas in play. They shouldn’t be.”

The one advantage they have: money. Battleground Republicans and GOP leaders have been itching for Trump to unleash his massive war chest to help them fend off Democratic attacks over voters’ concerns about gas and everyday costs among the ongoing war. Trump’s orbit started to make good on its promises Wednesday morning, doling out millions in spending for key Senate races through an affiliated Super PAC known as No Going Back PAC Inc., two people with direct knowledge of the matter confirmed.

But Republicans know that campaign funds can’t solve everything.

Advertisement

“We got to talk about the issues that people are dealing with. Families can’t afford their house, they can’t afford the food, they can’t afford health care, they can’t afford child care,” Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) said in an interview in the convention hall.

He placed most of the onus on Congress to tackle those issues and cut spending, but admitted Trump’s war with Iran had economic consequences.

“We have higher gas prices now as a result of the president trying to keep us safe as a result of what Iran wants to do,” Scott said. “So that’s hopefully a short-term problem that he’s going to deal with by destroying the regime.”

In a statement, White House spokesperson Olivia Wales argued that Democrats “created the affordability crisis.”

Advertisement

“President Trump has spent every day in office working to undo their mess and lower costs for working families by signing the largest middle class tax cuts in history, lowering the cost of prescription drugs, permanently expanding the child tax credit, fueling wage growth, and reshoring American manufacturing to create more high paying jobs,” Wales said.

Natalie Baldassarre, a spokesperson for the RNC, similarly blamed Democrats for surging prices, adding that “Republicans are cutting taxes, lowering drug prices, and putting money back in families’ pockets.”

Several Republicans plan to use their convention addresses to blame their Democratic opponents for voters’ price pains and argue it’s Republicans who are putting more money in Americans’ pockets — like Mike LiPetri, who’s running to unseat Democratic Rep. Tom Suozzi in New York. Others plan to paint a rosier picture of the economy than many voters say is the case right now.

That’s been a hard message for Republicans to sell. An August POLITICO Poll shows that a 34% plurality of Americans hold Trump fully responsible for the state of the current U.S. economy, compared with just 17% who say the same for former President Joe Biden.

Advertisement

And the very real time crunch — with less than two months until the November election — was a tangible pressure throughout the day in Dallas, as Republican lawmakers, battleground candidates and party officials gathered for what was planned to be a grand event to celebrate GOP accomplishments and drive turnout.

“Look, I think obviously we want to continue to drive down costs, whether it’s energy, whether it is housing, whether it is groceries,” Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), one of the most at-risk House Republicans in November, said in an interview. “We’re seeing, you know, obviously continued volatility in the oil markets, and we want to bring that down.”

Lawler, who is speaking at the convention Thursday night, touted Trump’s deal over Venezuela oil and largely blamed policy moves by New York Democrats for his state’s higher energy costs.

Trump told reporters Wednesday that oil prices are set to drop amid the ongoing U.S. conflict with Iran — but not until after the midterms, which is much later than those anxious Republicans would hope.

Advertisement

Some GOP hopefuls point to the overall goal to dismantle Iran’s nuclear capabilities as a necessary national security posture. The uptick in oil prices, therefore, is a short-term consequence for a greater long-term foreign policy success.

“We [have] to be patient with the fluctuations, especially with oil and what’s happening in the Gulf now,” said Marty O’Donnell, the Republican looking to unseat Democratic Rep. Susie Lee from her Las Vegas seat.

And the Republicans assembled in Dallas were the ones most likely to support the president — plenty of other lawmakers, including members running in tough races, stayed away, as did some rank-and-file Republicans.

“We have to hope that in six weeks the price per barrel goes down because it’s a big deal,” said one Georgia-based Republican strategist who is not attending the Dallas convention. “The Dems have been beating the daylights out of us on that for a while now.”

Advertisement

A GOP county chair in a region with House races that have been made more competitive by Trump’s unpopularity echoed those concerns.

“There’s no other commodity that when you drive down the street, you see the price,” said the county chair who also wasn’t in Dallas. “I know what gas costs because it’s on a fucking billboard on every intersection, and I’m forced to see it. It’s the most visible indicator of the economy, where we stand.”

And while Republicans are hoping that Trump can get his party’s economic messaging on track in his convention keynote address Thursday, some aren’t holding their breath for a major breakthrough.

“Maybe, maybe, maybe, maybe, maybe the president delivers a coherent speech that is clear, that is direct, that is policy oriented, that is forward-looking, and they can cut that up in social media and post that up all over the place,” said the GOP county chair. “Will he do that? Absolutely not.”

Advertisement

Mia McCarthy contributed to this report. 

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Journalists Remember Covering 9/11

Published

on

Journalists Remember Covering 9/11

!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”d92c0ad2-6f4c-4f79-b5dc-04b2016eba80″}).render(“6aa1d962e4b086ecc55fc98c”);});

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Why ban balaclavas, but not burqas?

Published

on

Why ban balaclavas, but not burqas?

The post Why ban balaclavas, but not burqas? appeared first on spiked.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Police Investigate Reform UK Donations After Channel 4 Documentary

Published

on

Police Investigate Reform UK Donations After Channel 4 Documentary

Detectives have launched an investigation after an undercover Channel 4 investigation into donations to Reform UK.

In a statement, the Metropolitan Police said they had “assessed the information provided and determined that there are potential offences requiring investigation”.

Detectives are “seeking to obtain relevant footage” from last Thursday’s Channel 4 broadcast, the force said.

The statement added: “Detectives continue to liaise closely with the Electoral Commission and Crown Prosecution Service as inquiries progress.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

How do young people in the UK feel about its relationship with the EU?

Published

on

How do young people in the UK feel about its relationship with the EU?

Heather Rolfe aruges that campaigners for a closer relationship with the EU will find it challenging to engage young people in a debate that has passed them by.

In the months following the Brexit vote it was widely noted that older people had swung the vote to Leave while young people had largely voted to remain. Almost three-quarters (73%) of 18–24-year-olds voted Remain, and only 27% Leave, compared to a 60%/40% split among the over 65s. Media articles talked of baby boomers ‘messing things up’, or ‘snatching away’ young people’s freedom of movement.

It is often assumed that the 2016 vote division by age remains, and even that anti-Brexit feeling among young people has become stronger. Recent research by British Future on public attitudes to a future UK-EU relationship casts doubt on this narrative. Findings suggest that pro-EU campaigns cannot take the youth vote for granted.

It’s true that 18–24-year-olds are more likely to believe it was wrong for the UK to leave the EU (57% vs 49% for all age groups), but they are much more likely than others to say they don’t know (31% vs 19%). Across a range of other questions on the future UK-EU relationship they are also more likely to lack an opinion or to lack understanding of key aspects, including free movement.

Advertisement

Nearly a quarter of young people (23%) say they don’t know whether the UK should hold a second referendum or not, compared to 15% across all age groups. When asked how they would vote in a future referendum, they are least likely to support staying out (17% vs 29% of all age groups).  But they are also much more likely than others to say they don’t know or would not vote (39% vs 25% of all ages).

‘Don’t know’ responses to key questions on the UK’s membership of the EU by age group

As recorded by many other surveys on immigration, ours found that young people aged 18-24 have more positive attitudes to immigration than other age groups and are less likely to favour reductions in immigration numbers. But this does not necessarily mean they are more in favour of EU migration or free movement. They are less likely than those in other age groups to say it should be easier to work in another EU country (46% vs 53%). They are also more likely than others to say they don’t know whether post-Brexit immigration controls should be kept, whether they would accept free movement if it meant less trade or if they would support a range of measures to manage free movement (for example restrictions on state benefits).

All of this might be understandable given that they were children or adolescents at the time. However, it might also be expected that as young adults they would be more inclined than others to support the types of mobility that they, or their siblings, could benefit from. However, they are no more likely than others to support a closer UK-EU relationship for school trips or for study. And, strikingly, they are less likely than other age groups to support the Youth Experience Scheme, currently under negotiation, by 45% compared to 57% of all age groups.

Advertisement

To understand attitudes in more depth, we held eight focus groups – two of them with young people who could not vote in 2016. Participants said that Brexit was not their decision, whether they thought it had been a good idea or not. The idea that young people have disproportionately lost out was a stronger theme of the all-age groups than those with young people. However, when potential opportunities for young people were discussed with 18–24-year-olds, they did feel that they had few opportunities to study and work in the EU.

Participants of all ages liked the idea of Erasmus+, the EU’s funding scheme for education, training, youth, and sport which the UK will join in 2027. They also liked the idea of the Youth Experience Scheme. For both, support came with the condition that they are inclusive and available to young people facing financial or other barriers. Older people believed that Erasmus had largely benefited those from advantaged backgrounds. Young focus group participants said they would not know how to go about looking at study or work opportunities abroad and wanted help with this if they were to participate.

We had expected young people to be more in favour than they were of a closer UK-EU relationship in their survey responses and to be more engaged in the focus group discussions. Their detachment from the issues is partly because, as they said in the focus groups, they were too young to absorb the arguments around free movement, sovereignty and rule taking vs rule making. Few also said they had learned about the EU at school or discussed with family or friends. Wider research suggests they are not disengaged from politics in general, but are more interested in issues such as job insecurity, cost of living and housing affordability.

Are today’s 18–24-year-olds fundamentally different to those of 2016? Research before the referendum found similar levels of disengagement to now: only half said they were certain to cast a vote, compared to more than two-thirds in other age groups. Turnout in the referendum was also lower in areas with a higher proportion of young people.

Advertisement

The planned reduction in the voting age to 16 is seen as an opportunity to encourage interest in democratic engagement. However, more is needed if young people are to engage in the UK’s place in the EU. Their lives and opportunities are rarely part of the narrative of campaigners, politicians and the media and many do not see it as relevant to their lives. On the issue of youth mobility which offers them opportunities, the focus of the debate is on inward migration: how many EU citizens will come to the UK for work or study? Should numbers be capped and who will pay their study fees?

It might also be that opportunities to study and work abroad appeal to relatively few young people, even if barriers were removed. But we can only be certain if they are more involved in discussions about what a closer future relationship might mean for them.

By Dr Heather Rolfe, Director of Research, British Future.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Politics Home Article | Police Launch Criminal Investigation Into Reform UK Donations

Published

on

Police Launch Criminal Investigation Into Reform UK Donations
Police Launch Criminal Investigation Into Reform UK Donations

The Met has launched an investigation following the Channel 4 broadcast (Alamy)


2 min read

The Metropolitan Police have launched an investigation into allegations that Reform UK breached donation rules by using foreign funding. 

Advertisement

On Wednesday, the Met said that it had received several reports “relating to donations and polling involving a political party” following a broadcast by Channel 4 on Thursday.

In a statement, a spokesperson for the Met said: “Detectives have assessed the information provided and determined that there are potential offences requiring investigation.”

They added: “The potential offences are similar in nature to matters already under investigation by the Met’s Special Enquiry Team relating to donations made to the same political party. As a result, these matters will form part of that ongoing investigation. “

Advertisement

It comes after a Verbatim and Channel 4 investigation appeared to show senior officials discussing how to disguise donations from foreign sources.

Under UK electoral law, foreign companies are not permitted to fund party activities.

A Met spokesperson said: “Following a broadcast by Channel 4 News on Thursday, 3 September, the Met received a number of reports relating to donations and polling involving a political party.

Advertisement

The statement added: “All allegations under investigation relate to potential offences under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. 

 

“As part of enquiries, detectives are seeking to obtain relevant footage relating to the broadcast on Thursday 3, September.

 

“Detectives continue to liaise closely with the Electoral Commission and Crown Prosecution Service as enquiries progress.”

When the investigation was first broadcast on Channel 4 last week, Reform UK said that the party had been the target of a “hoax”. But on Friday morning the party announced an investigation following the broadcast, with senior officials James Orr and Dan Jukes stepping down. 

While Reform had hoped to use its party conference in Birmingham over the weekend to regain its momentum after a difficult few months, senior figures were instead forced to face questions about the revelations. 

 

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Game Of Thrones’ Maisie Williams Addresses Arya Stark Spin-Off Rumours

Published

on

Game Of Thrones' Maisie Williams Addresses Arya Stark Spin-Off Rumours

At the beginning of this year, The Hollywood Reporter suggested that an idea for a Game Of Thrones follow-up film centring around Arya was in the “very early” stages of development.

When asked about this speculation during a recent interview with The Guardian, however, Maisie made it clear that no one had been in touch with her about the supposed project.

“I saw that, too! I was like, huh?” she admitted.

Maisie then confessed she’s not even sure whether she’d be up for returning to the role that launched her career, which she last played in the final season of Game Of Thrones back in 2019.

Advertisement

“She would have to be developed in some way because I feel like I’ve changed so much, and I feel like what people loved about Arya is that she was always a child doing things that were quite grown-up,” Maisie claimed.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Pickle Drinks Are Everywhere, These Are The Best Sodas To Try Now

Published

on

Pickle Drinks Are Everywhere, These Are The Best Sodas To Try Now

What was once something you interacted with when it was sandwiched between your patty and bun is now everywhere.

From big snack pickles, to picklebacks, the past decade has certainly been the time for pickles to shine.

And now, pickles are dominating the soft drink market, too.

Earlier this year, I had a limited-edition pickle matcha, which blended matcha with lemonade and pickle brine, at Bird & Blend.

Advertisement

And now, pickle sodas seem to be popping up left, right and centre.

Almost certainly not for the pickle protester, these drinks taste (shockingly) as though they’ve been infused with citrusy brine.

Three Cents’ has a slightly more cucumber, vegetal taste to it, and comes in the brand’s classic glass bottle.

Yew’s, on the other hand, tastes exactly like drinking a sparkling version of the liquid straight from the jar.

If you do have a particular penchant for pickles, like me, these drinks are refreshing and quench that need to chomp down an entire jar of the things as a late-night ‘snack’.

Advertisement

Should you be even slightly opposed to a pickle, though, you’ll find yourself making a face like you’ve eaten a sour candy at even the first sip – they’re that precise.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

11 Waterproof Shoes And Boots For Men And Women 2026

Published

on

11 Waterproof Shoes And Boots For Men And Women 2026

I’m going to say something revealing here: until recently, I hadn’t really thought much about the concept of a waterproof shoe.

Yeah… I’ve been braving soggy toes for my entire 27 years on this planet, but I’ve decided it’s probably time to stop.

After doing a considerable amount of browsing (as you do as a shopping writer) I discovered that I’ve been holding an incorrect bias: waterproof shoes don’t have to be ugly.

Advertisement

Nor do they have to be wellies. In fact, there are plenty of waterproof and water-resistant shoes and boots out there that can be worn with any outfit you like. You don’t have to look like you’re wading through a field of mud at Glasto à la Alexa Chung in 2011. Who knew?

With Super El Niño on its way with more rain and wind than can usually be expected of a British winter, you’re definitely going to want to make sure you have a pair of comfortable shoes that will protect you from the elements.

I’ve rounded up the best men’s and women’s footwear to shop now – you better get your hands on them before they sell out. Oh, and don’t worry, there’s not a single knee-high wellington boot in sight.

Best waterproof shoes and boots for men and women 2026

Advertisement

I have these shoes, and at first I have to admit I was worried they’d look too much like walking boots to wear on the daily.

But after wearing them for the first time at a weekend festival without so much as trying to break them in, I realised these would be my new go-to comfortable shoes.

There was not a blister in sight, they’re extremely comfortable, and they have a Gore-Tex membrane that keeps your feet dry. I also love the colour selections.

Thank God for the Gore-Tex revival: you can now look stylish and weather appropriate at the same time.

Leading the way in this category is Salomon, who has created a pair of ‘urban chic’ trainers that blend waterproof protection and breathability. Not to mention they look really, really cool.

Surprise! I bet you thought you’d seen the last of Timberland. You haven’t! The brand is back in full swing, in its signature yellow shade.

These boots are entirely waterproof, and despite being mighty durable are also loaded with an anti-fatigue footbed for comfort and 400 grams of PrimaLoft insulation to keep your foot feeling fresh all day long.

Advertisement

Here, my friends, is where you realise waterproof boots really do come in all shapes and sizes. I adore the idea of heading out on a rainy day in a Western boot. Yeehaw, cowgirl.

But I adore even more that the colour of these boots is called ‘reliable brown’. So true.

All I can ask for is that my feet stay warm and dry this autumn. These puffy shoes are made just for that, as they use PufferTherm technology to keep you warm all day, while also protecting from stormy weather.

You can buy them either as an ankle or mid-calf boot, and my favourite part is that you can add on a matching leg warmer for the days when it’s too chilly to move.

Gah – this autumnal colour is getting my creativity whirring. Picture these next to an open fire, or with a warm mug of mulled wine in your hands.

Wherever you are, that grippy sole is not letting you be susceptible to any slips or slides. And you’ll look extra chic doing it.

Look how sturdy that sole is, no drop of rain is going to get you in that. Especially not considering the sole extends to a mudguard, while the oiled leather upper keeps your foot dry from the damp.

Of course, they’re comfortable too, as Birkenstock has included its Deep Blue Footbed, which is supposed to feel like you have your foot in the sand, but with extra support.

Advertisement

In Regatta we trust. The great British outdoor brand has recently stepped up its fashion game big time, so this pair of short wellies naturally looks as good as any Chelsea boots.

They’re easy to pull on, thanks to the pull tab, and have a sleek rounded toe, so you won’t look like a cartoon character in boots.

You don’t have to go for a knee-high option to stay dry, in fact a casual city boot like this pair from Rains will suffice to keep your tootsies safe.

Made from matte rubber, these boots are built to have a good, cushioned grip. They come in men’s and women’s sizing and a ton of colour options (how cool is this shiny blue pair?).

If wellies aren’t quite your thing, these space-looking Moon Boots are water resistant and repellant, so they’ll keep you cosy and protected as long as you don’t stand in a puddle.

I love how these look with a skirt or tucked under wide leg trousers, or even as a slipper to wear around the house.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Rivals Season 2 Return Date Finally Confirmed After Dramatic Cliffhanger

Published

on

Danny Dyer and Katherine Parkinson in the new season of Rivals
Danny Dyer and Katherine Parkinson in the new season of RivalsDanny Dyer and Katherine Parkinson in the new season of Rivals

After the shock ending that’s left us hanging since the beginning of the summer, there’s finally been some news on when Rivals will be returning to our screen.

On Wednesday afternoon, it was announced that the second half of season two would be premiering on Disney+ on Wednesday 11 November.

The gripping bonkbuster will initially return with a three-episode drop, followed by three more new episodes in the following weeks.

Besides this exciting new info, Disney has also released brand new photos from the upcoming episodes, offering fans a sneak peek at what they’re in for.

Alex Hassell’s character has “personal demons” to face in the next episodes of Rivals

An official press release has teased: “Picking up after the gut-wrenching mid-series finale, Tony Baddingham and Declan O’Hara’s battle for the Cotswolds crown reaches fever pitch, while Rupert Campbell-Black is forced to confront his own personal demons.

“Against a backdrop of hedonistic parties, Bonfire Night chaos, the Hampshire Hunt Ball and a turbulent Christmas, affairs unravel, alliances fracture and rivalries intensify.

Advertisement

“Caught in the middle of the frenzied franchise war, Taggie O’Hara must find the courage to follow her heart, while those around her face the consequences of ambition, power and secrets that can no longer remain hidden. But as series two draws to a close, who will get their happy ending?”

David Tennant in season two of RivalsDavid Tennant in season two of Rivals

It was previously revealed that Rachael Stirling will be joining the cast as Lady Monica Baddingham’s younger sister, Araminta Pemberton in the next run of episodes, which will also feature Rupert Evans and Big Little Lies’ Santiago Cabrera as new characters.

Earlier this year, Rivals writer Laura Wade claimed that the cliffhanger at the end of episode six was partly responsible for the mid-season pause in an effort “for those bits of story to just have a moment to sink in with viewers” and “build up some anticipation”.

“Also, we’ve got the Fifa World Cup coming up, so we’re releasing the first half before the football,” she pointed out on a more practical level, as well as noting that the second half of season two is set at a different time of the year to season one, so a longer break between episodes felt fitting.

Meanwhile, a third season has also been given the green light by Disney.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025