Connect with us

NewsBeat

UK needs new laws for AI in healthcare, says watchdog

Published

on

A cut of of Anthony Zurcher wearing a suit and tie in front of a red, black, grey and blue graphic background featuring the US Capitol Building

The UK needs new regulations for AI products used in the NHS and other healthcare settings, says Britain’s industry watchdog.

The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), which regulates all medical devices and licenses treatment drugs in the UK, has published 44 recommendations to update its policies as the use of AI in the sector rises.

The technology will soon be routinely used within the NHS, MHRA chief Lawrence Tallon told the BBC.

“What I would expect is that patients will… increasingly see AI as part of the way that normal NHS healthcare is delivered,” he said.

Advertisement

“That should happen in a way that they can maintain their trust and their confidence in what’s happening.”

The report was compiled by an independent commission and involved input from more than 12,000 people including patients and clinicians.

The recommendations include:

  • Continuously monitoring AI products and removing them from regulatory approval if they malfunction or become less effective over time

  • Giving patients the right to know whether AI is involved in their care, and easy access to information about the products involved

  • The power to penalise the developers of an AI product if it fails to meet required standards

  • An AI “L plate” system which would make it easier for new AI models to be trialled by healthcare professionals under close supervision

“The medical devices regulatory framework predominantly dates from a period where we were thinking about things like hip replacements and knee replacements, or smaller things like stethoscopes and plasters,” Tallon said.

Advertisement

He added while current guidelines may work for simple AI products trained to spot known symptoms on scans, for example, the rules do not apply to more complex models.

“Unlike most of the medical products we’re used to regulating, these products continue to change after the point of authorization,” he said.

“As new data gets fed in, they learn, they adapt, they drift.”

And he acknowledged trying to regulate AI is a global challenge.

Advertisement

“I don’t think at this moment in time we can point to a single country, a single regulatory framework, and say that they have absolutely cracked it,” he said.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

NewsBeat

Games Inbox: Which was the best game in the Nintendo Direct?

Published

on

Games Inbox: Which was the best game in the Nintendo Direct?
Metroid Ravenous – Samus is back on the menu (Nintendo)

The Thursday letters page gives its view on the second Nintendo Direct of the week, as one reader falls in love with Onimusha: Way Of The Sword.

Games Inbox is a collection of our readers’ letters, comments, and opinions. To join in with the discussions yourself email gamecentral@metro.co.uk

Mama mia!
Considering it was September I didn’t think that Nintendo Direct was too bad. They never announce anything really big at this time of year, but I was surprised by Metroid Ravenous and the new Kirby game.

I don’t care about Kirby, but Metroid looked really good and hopefully will take away the bad taste of Metroid Prime 4. To be honest, I’m surprised they even made a new game, but I suppose they started years before they realised what a dud Metroid Prime 4 was.

Advertisement

As usual for the Switch 2 generation, the real question is where are all the big names? We’ve had two Kirby games before we’ve had even a hint at a new Mario (I think that’s two Directs in a row where he wasn’t in any game at all) and there’s still no word on Animal Crossing, Super Smash Bros., Luigi’s Mansion, or Splatoon 4.

Whether you like these games or not the priorities Nintendo is showing are just absolutely baffling. I can only assume that something has gone wrong with the development of all these games and the ones that are coming out are quicker to make and didn’t have any problems. But it really is weird. It almost feels like Nintendo’s lost the rights to Mario or something. And where is the new IP?!
Xane

Expert, exclusive gaming analysis

Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning.

Anything but Mario
A-woo-hoo! Super Mario and the world beyond! Ahem, joke, it’s Kirby isn’t it…

Advertisement

You know what? No one can say there wasn’t a lot of incoming titles in that Direct, most of which I probably wouldn’t get.

Back in the N64/GameCube eras, they were my only consoles so I would of bought and traded almost all of these titles and convinced myself that Eternal Darkness, Star Fox Adventures, and Blast Corps were better alternatives to Tomb Raider, Metal Gear, and Resident Evil. But on the flip side I was playing Zelda: Ocarina Of Time, Super Mario 64, GoldenEye 007, and F-Zero GX; so swings and roundabouts.

Anyway, choice is always a good thing and there was certainly lots of choice packed in there.
big boy bent

All in good time
What surprised me about the Nintendo Direct was the sheer volume of games. It’s almost too many. I’m joking of course.

Advertisement

It seems the Switch 2 is going to become the indie machine. My Switch 1 is already full to the brim with games for my commute and this is pushing me more towards upgrading. This and Zelda: Ocarina Of Time.

Also, it appears, if you don’t mind waiting, then most games are going to end up on here. Maybe even GTA 6. Never say never.
Rob Taylor, Attorney at Brid Law

Email your comments to: gamecentral@metro.co.uk

Portable Legend
What a nostalgia bomb the Zelda update was, brought back great core memories as a kid. Running onto Hyrule Field for the first time, it felt unreal. Up there with Super Mario 64 for the sense of awe for the first time.

Advertisement

Tempted me to get a Switch 2 for sure, between being a grown-up and having kids there is just hardly any free time, so I think being able to play on the sofa while kids asleep and the Mrs watches whatever on Netflix is the only way to squeeze all these games in.
Rich

Portable Christmas
I’ve bought my little nephew a 3DS for Christmas, as he’s getting into Pokémon a bit. Would you have a list of must play games on the system? Something for him when he gets bored with Pokemon. He’s seven if it helps.

Thanks for any advice you can offer. It’s a system I’ve never used and Google just gives the same list of Mario, Metroid, etc.
Bobwallett

Advertisement

GC: Well, Super Mario 3D Land and Metroid: Samus Returns are very good but there’s also Zelda: A Link Between Worlds, Zelda: Ocarina Of Time 3D, Zelda: Majora’s Mask 3D, Fire Emblem Awakening, Fire Emblem Fates, Luigi’s Mansion 2, Pushmo, Mario Kart 7, Etrian Odyssey 4, Kid Icarus: Uprising, and Kirby: Planet Robobot.

Another great game
I’d never played an Onimusha game before, but thought the recent demo looked interesting, so decided to give it a go. I was also slightly influenced by the excellent work Capcom has done over recent years with the Resident Evil series and Pragmata, all of which I have thoroughly enjoyed.

The demo was impressive and piqued my interest enough to put in a pre-order, leaving me excited to know more about how the mechanics of the game and how the story might develop. Playing the final release has been a real eye-opener. Not only is it graphically stunning, with some of the best character models and animation I’ve ever seen, it offers deep and varied gameplay and the mythology, and gradual opening of the map and widening of the story, have been a joy to experience.

The swordplay is so satisfying, with a strong sense of physical connection, and the more fantastical areas of the map are so full of detail and imagination, it has really been an absolute joy to play. It has become an instant classic, sitting amongst the best games I have ever played. I highly recommend it. Thanks for the great work GC team.
Rob

Advertisement

GC: Thank you.

Autumn harvest
That was a disappointment after yesterday’s Zelda one. The only two games I am really interested in are Metroid Ravenous and Danganronpa 2×2, but both are next year so I try not to think of anything that far off.

Really wish we had had even a hint of a new Mario, although I guess they want to do Zelda first and then reveal it maybe.
Simon

Don’t miss Gaming news! Add us as a Preferred Source

As a loyal GameCentral reader, we want to make sure you never miss our articles when searching for gaming stories. We have all the latest video games news, reviews, previews, and interviews, with a vibrant community of highly engaged readers.

Advertisement

Click the button below and tick Metro.co.uk to ensure you see stories from us first in Google Search.

Add us as a Preferred Source

GameCentral collage of Mario Kart, Ghost of Yotei, and Halo
GameCentral has been delivering unique games news and reviews for over a decade

Familiar song
Hey Listen! Firstly, that full orchestra montage of Zelda melodies that preceded the Zelda news certainly give me a tingle of excitement and damn near brought a tear to my eyes.

Advertisement

Secondly, Ocarina Of Time reborn looked absolutely phenomenal and a dream come true for myself, that cherished the original growing up. This is exactly how I had hoped it would look in the modern era.

Honestly, though, I was pretty surprised navigating through some of the negative comments out there, attempting to paint some sort of portrait of ruin regarding the new visuals.

It’s like Star Fox 64 remake all over again, particularly the fastidious scrutiny of the character art. But less we forget, there has been a harmony of dissonance in the Zelda fandom’s idea of the ideal artistic direction, ever since The Wind Waker’s whiplashing cartoony aesthetics were unveiled.

Fortunately, many have come to accept that Fox McCloud and co.’s initially polarising new designs actually looked just fine in the finished article, and I believe that’ll be the case here.

Advertisement

For me, new Ocarina Of Time’s art direction is like an amalgamation of organically evolved assets from the N64 original, that Space World 2000 Zelda technical demo, the 2011 Wii U HD Zelda technical demo, and perhaps a hint of some of the more impressive Unreal Engine Zelda interpretations on YouTube; but a thousand times more considered, artistically nuanced, and resplendent.

Sure, I would’ve loved an additional dungeon or two – although such an accommodation technically hasn’t been ruled out yet and I am about as hopelessly idealistic as you can be – but I didn’t set myself up for disappointment because I was fully expecting a virtually 1:1 remake, so anything extra was a wishful bonus.

What Nintendo have delivered, though, looks transformed and more grand courtesy of the quantum leap in visual fidelity. I’d liken the Ocarina Of Time remake style to Resident Evil remake in some ways, which for my money is still the finest remake to date. In that it’s beautiful and extremely faithful to the original, with a healthy dosage of new quality of life features.

Admittedly, Resident Evil remake did also have new mechanics, lore, enemies, and a brand new area, so I don’t know where I’m going here. Just wanted to give Resident Evil remake a shout out I guess.

Advertisement

Visually though, new Ocarina Of Time impressed me almost as much as GTA 6’s proper reveal did, because I just wasn’t prepared for just how stunning it’d be. Which is truly a testament to the talents of Nintendo’s in-house, or out-house (?!), developers.

Watching the footage, the remake is probably how Ocarina Of Time looked like to my 12-year-old mind all those decades ago. It spoke directly to the inner child in me. That sense of wonder and childlike glee it invoked was just magical. Now I await the sand in the phantom hourglass to run its course!
GG

Inbox also-rans
Really liked the look of Metroid Ravenous in the Direct and there were a few other good things too like Fright Night and Onyx: The Dark Grip. Who knows how they’ll turn out but I liked the idea of them.
Taylor Moon

I really wish Onyx: The Dark Grip wasn’t by Bloober Team or I’d really be looking forward to it, because I love the idea of the character becoming aware of you as the player. I hope they pull it off.
Focus

Advertisement

Email your comments to: gamecentral@metro.co.uk

The small print
New Inbox updates appear every weekday morning, with special Hot Topic Inboxes at the weekend. Readers’ letters are used on merit and may be edited for length and content.

You can also submit your own 500 to 600-word Reader’s Feature at any time via email or our Submit Stuff page, which if used will be shown in the next available weekend slot.

You can also leave your comments below and don’t forget to follow us on Twitter.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Philippines ferry – live: Five dead and 87 missing after fire on boat to Coron Island

Published

on

Daily Mirror

As the search and rescue operation continues following the blaze the Coast Guard have confirmed that 42 people have been rescued. Initial reports indicate there have been five deaths but this number is likely to change.

The Coast Guard and other emergency services continue to conduct search operations in the waters of Coron, Palawan.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

DAN HODGES: Hypocrisy of Stella Creasy, the female Labour MP so vocal about women’s rights who praised a segregated Muslim march

Published

on

Stella Creasy, Labour MP for Walthamstow, beamed in a video post beside young women in hijabs at a Muslim celebration, which was segregated along gender lines

The most shameful thing about Stella Creasy’s tweet was her glee.

The video post was to mark a day of celebration in the Muslim calendar, and pictured behind her were young women in hijabs and niqabs beaming at the camera.

With unashamed delight, the Labour MP for Walthamstow declared to the world: ‘These women are the future optometrists, lawyers, accountants, surgeons and leaders of our community and country. They also celebrate the Prophets Birthday at the Milad il Nabi March. Everyone is welcome so come next year and meet them to find out what this event is as they are fantastic!’

But Creasy had left out something important. The Muslim celebration she had lauded as being welcoming to all was not, it transpired, quite so inclusive after all.

Advertisement

Britain’s future surgeons and lawyers had not actually been part of the main body of the march, which was a male-only event. Instead, they had been required to stage their own separate parade, away from the men.

When challenged over this by journalist Jenni Russell: ‘Are these women segregated away from the march you posted?’ Creasy replied: ‘Jenni, they were.’

Segregation along gender lines is a topic of great interest to the former shadow minister for Crime Prevention. In 2022, when a controversy broke out over attempts by the exclusive Garrick Club to retain its male-only status, Creasy led the charge.

Advertisement

Stella Creasy, Labour MP for Walthamstow, beamed in a video post beside young women in hijabs at a Muslim celebration, which was segregated along gender lines

‘If this rule is not changed, membership of the Garrick club should be considered incompatible with membership of the 21st Century,’ she raged. ‘Whether it’s politicians, lawyers, journalists or businessmen hiding behind its panelled walls, they cannot hide how out of touch with the modern world it is to have a club which excludes women as a way of shoring up the importance of men as it does neither sex any favours.’

She also took up the fight for biological men who self-identify as trans to be granted access to safe spaces previously reserved for biological women. ‘Do I want to live in a world where we’re policing everyone who goes into a toilet? No’, she proudly stated, before claiming: ‘Do I think some women were born with penises? Yes.’

So it is somewhat surprising that an MP, who was once described as ‘a latter day Harriet Harman’, feels women and trans-women should have equal rights to be just about everywhere, except on the streets of her own constituency. Actually, maybe it’s not that surprising.

Advertisement

Creasy’s hypocrisy and self-righteousness are attended by a transparent cynicism. According to the last census, 25 per cent of the Walthamstow seat is Muslim. That equates to over 20,000 eligible voters, easily enough to erase her otherwise comfortable 17,000 majority.

So she has made a simple, if entirely self-serving, calculation. Her fight against the patriarchy will be waged without fear or favour. Until it risks bringing her into conflict with those of the Muslim faith. At which point the patriarchy can marginalise and subjugate women to its heart’s content.

Though to be fair to the MP nicknamed ‘Saint Ella’ by some of her colleagues because of her perceived haughtiness, Creasy is not alone in parading her grating political opportunism.

Last year, Jess Phillips, specifically appointed to the role of Safeguarding Minister because of her pioneering work in tackling violence against women, faced calls for her resignation from several victims of the predominantly Muslim rape gangs after she blocked a national inquiry into the scandal.

Advertisement

Again, Phillips’s decision to offload her previously inviolate principles was directly linked to the demographics of her constituency. At the 2024 election she had survived an especially toxic campaign at the hands of the fanatically pro-Islamist Workers Party. And again, the difference between her previous rhetoric, and her political timidity when faced with the potential ire of Muslim voters, was stark.

Labour's statement about Israel's 'illegal settlements' is surely an attempt to relieve pressure on their MPs facing a pincer movement from Zack Polanski¿s pro-Palestinian Green Party

Labour’s statement about Israel’s ‘illegal settlements’ is surely an attempt to relieve pressure on their MPs facing a pincer movement from Zack Polanski’s pro-Palestinian Green Party

But then that is basically Labour’s MO now. Yesterday the Government announced it was introducing sanctions on what it termed ‘illegal settlements’ in the disputed Israel/Palestine West Bank. 

According to Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband this was to attempt to kick-start a renewed search for a two-state solution to the Middle East’s most intractable conflict. But as everyone watching his statement was aware, it was primarily an attempt to relieve pressure on Labour MPs facing a pincer movement from radical Islamist splinter parties, and Zack Polanski’s pro-Palestinian Greens.

Advertisement

Yet by doing so Andy Burnham and his colleagues are in danger of finding themselves riding around on the back of an especially dangerous tiger. One that will become ever more voracious as the next election approaches.

When our new Prime Minister was elected, he pledged that every new policy he announced would have to pass the ‘Makerfield test’. Basically, if it wasn’t a priority for his predominantly working class constituents in the North West, it wouldn’t be a priority for him.

Well, I spent a lot of time in Makerfield during that by-election. And I didn’t come across a single person who placed the Israel- Palestine conflict at the top of their list of pressing issues. Or who expressed their desire to attend religious marches segregated along lines of gender.

The kind of tortured moral relativity currently being paraded by Stella Creasy and her colleagues also runs into direct conflict with the brand of politics we were supposed to be getting from our new Prime Minister.

Advertisement

A couple of weeks ago one of Andy Burnham’s allies was at pains to stress to me how, on issues like immigration, he was attuned to the hopes and fears of working, not Metropolitan, Britain. ‘He’s from Wigan, not central Manchester,’ I was told. Creasy’s posturing demonstrates that message has yet to filter down the M6.

The PM pledged every new policy must pass the ¿Makerfield test¿. But, says Dan Hodges, I did not see a single person in Makerfield who put the Israel- Palestine conflict at the top of their list

The PM pledged every new policy must pass the ‘Makerfield test’. But, says Dan Hodges, I did not see a single person in Makerfield who put the Israel- Palestine conflict at the top of their list

The sinister scenes in Dover, where masked men clashed with police, brought condemnation across the political spectrum. Why does this not apply to issues like gender segregation too?

The sinister scenes in Dover, where masked men clashed with police, brought condemnation across the political spectrum. Why does this not apply to issues like gender segregation too?

But perhaps the most staggering thing about her intervention was the timing. At precisely the moment she was joyously tweeting about the women shunted aside by the men in their community parading through London’s streets, a firestorm had erupted over a different display of toxic masculinity.

Advertisement

The sinister scenes in Dover and Portsmouth, where masked men clashed with police, vandalised property and caused widespread disruption, had brought condemnation from across the political spectrum.

‘We have a responsibility in the times that we’re living in,’ the Prime Minister told his assembled MPs. ‘It’s a solemn responsibility to prevent the politics of poison seeping into our streets.’

Fine. But that has to be extended to all strains of that poison. This is Britain in 2026, not the deep US South of the 1930s. Segregation on our streets based on gender or race should be intolerable in all its forms. It should be especially intolerable to Members of Parliament elected on a pledge to serve all their constituents, regardless of colour or creed.

And it should be least tolerable of all to those Labour MPs who have made it their life’s work to lecture everyone in earshot about the need to challenge the abuses of the patriarchy.

Advertisement

‘Everyone is welcome so come next year and meet them to find out what this event is as they are fantastic!’ Stella Creasy tweeted excitedly. When the women of your constituency aren’t treated like second class citizens, with your gushing approval Stella, we will.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

‘National security can’t come at the expense of social security’: Burnham’s staggering admission as Kemi says it confirms Labour is officially the Welfare Party

Published

on

Prime Minister Andy Burnham spoke during Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday

Labour was branded the ‘Welfare Party’ on Wednesday after Andy Burnham said he would never prioritise defence spending over benefits.

In an extraordinary intervention, the Prime Minister said he was serious about national security, but it ‘cannot come at the expense of social security’.

Writing in the Daily Mail, Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said Mr Burnham had ‘said the quiet part out loud’, adding: ‘For our new PM, social security – welfare – comes above national security.

‘The Labour Party has become the Welfare Party. The first duty of government is defence of the country, not paying more benefits.’

Advertisement

Last week, Mrs Badenoch laid out detailed plans to find £10billion to raise defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP by 2030. The package included £8billion of cuts to the welfare budget, half of it through reforms to the runaway housing benefit bill.

During angry clashes in the Commons during Prime Minister’s Questions, Mr Burnham refused to commit to the 3 per cent target, which his new Chancellor John Healey has warned is the minimum needed to keep Britain safe.

And the PM rounded on the Conservatives for proposing ‘crude’ benefit cuts to fund the Armed Forces. ‘We do everything to support our national security, but it cannot come at the expense of social security,’ he said.

Defending his support for higher welfare spending, he said strong national security ‘also depends on resilience in our communities’. He said Labour would never be ‘forced to choose between the two’.

Advertisement

Prime Minister Andy Burnham spoke during Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch - pictured on Friday in Sussex

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch – pictured on Friday in Sussex 

The PM’s comments create a clear dividing line in British politics over how quickly defence spending should increase in the face of rising threats – and how it should be paid for.

Advertisement

They also appear to be at odds with remarks from new Defence Secretary Wes Streeting, who said in June that ‘there is no social justice without national security’. And they will raise fresh doubts about whether Labour will ever act to rein in the runaway welfare bill.

Earlier this year, messages released in the Mandelson files revealed that work and pensions secretary Pat McFadden told the disgraced peer that Labour MPs were demanding more welfare spending, saying: ‘Every meeting I have is: ‘Who can we tax in order to pay benefits to others?’

Tory welfare spokesman Helen Whately said: ‘Does Burnham know what happens when a vulnerable country gets attacked? Without national security, there will be no social security.’ Fellow Tory Claire Coutinho said the PM’s comments were ‘barking mad’.

Reform UK’s deputy leader Richard Tice accused Mr Burnham of ‘surrender’, adding: ‘He’s basically saying mild anxiety is more important than the safety of the realm.’

Advertisement

Spending on sickness and disability benefits is on course to hit £109billion by the end of the decade – an increase of more than £30billion on last year. Sir Keir was forced to abandon plans to trim £5billion from the welfare bill last year following a mutiny by Labour MPs.

Mr Burnham on Wednesday confirmed he was opposed to any ‘crude cuts’ to benefits. He claimed that long-term reforms to housing and education could eventually bring the benefits bill down.

But one Treasury insider told the Mail that the welfare budget is now the only potential source of significant revenue: ‘In the past, Chancellors could always find a few billion pounds down the back of the sofa if they really had to. 

The Prime Minister speaking at PMQs on Wednesday

The Prime Minister speaking at PMQs on Wednesday 

Advertisement
Mr Burnham at a meeting with the Jewish community leaders at Downing Street last Thursday

Mr Burnham at a meeting with the Jewish community leaders at Downing Street last Thursday 

‘But all the low-hanging fruit is gone. We can’t borrow more, we can’t really tax much more – the only thing left is welfare.’

Britain has suffered an alarming slide down the Nato spending league table in recent years as other countries ramp up investment to meet growing threats. After being a top player for decades, the UK is now in 13th place in terms of defence spending as a percentage of GDP.

Under Labour’s plans, spending will nudge up from 2.6 per cent next year to 2.7 per cent by the end of the decade. By contrast, Germany expects to spend 3.5 per cent by 2030 while Poland is already spending 4.7 per cent.

Advertisement

Mr Burnham is under pressure from MPs on all sides to increase defence spending in the face of growing threats from Russia and other hostile states.

Tan Dhesi, Labour chairman of the Commons defence committee, last week accused him of ‘kicking the can down the road’. In his resignation as defence secretary in June, Mr Healey said Labour’s plans ‘fall well short of what is needed for defence and the country at this dangerous time’, and urged ministers to move to 3 per cent by 2030.

But neither he nor Mr Burnham are willing to commit to hitting the target by the end of the decade. Instead, Mr Burnham on Wednesday adopted the looser target of spending 3.5 per cent by 2035.

Advertisement

The Tory plans involve saving at least £4billion a year through reforms to housing benefit, and restoring the two-child benefit cap, which Labour scrapped this year, raising a further £3.1billion.

Another £1billion would be saved by ending VAT exemptions for Motability vehicles. The remainder of the £10billion would be funded by scrapping the controversial Chagos Islands giveaway and by diverting money from spending on new windfarms and civil research and development.

Downing Street insisted Mr Burnham was committed to bringing down the welfare bill but refused to put a timescale on it.

– DAILY MAIL COMMENT: After seven weeks in Downing Street, the PM’s mask FINALLY slips on welfare and defence spending 

Advertisement

– QUENTIN LETTS: The PM flicked through his folder with rising panic. He knew he had a fact in there somewhere

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Trump team removed plaque critical of Confederate monument in Arlington cemetery

Published

on

Trump team removed plaque critical of Confederate monument in Arlington cemetery

The Trump administration removed materials from Arlington National Cemetery that criticized a former monument to Confederate soldiers for its romanticized depiction of slavery, the latest in its campaign to drastically change the representation of the Civil War in high-profile public spaces.

In recent weeks, crews reportedly removed text at the former site of the Confederate Monument, which had described the statue that once stood at the site as presenting a “nostalgic, mythologized vision of the Confederacy, including highly sanitized depictions of slavery.”

The monument, installed in 1914 and removed in 2023 after a vote by Congress, had explicitly referred to the pro-slavery Confederacy’s mission to violently separate from the United States as the “lost cause.”

A Defense Department web page noting that the statue featured racist tropes, such as an enslaved man following his enslaver into war and a Black “Mammy” caring for white children, was also recently amended to remove this context.

Advertisement

A new sign at the former statue site notes that in 2025, the Army entered into an agreement with Virginia to once again display the statue in Arlington with “interpretive content to ensure visitors receive clear and accurate contextual information.”

The Trump administration recently removed information at the former site of a Confederate memorial in Arlington National Cemetery that criticized the statue’s romanticized vision of slavery
The Trump administration recently removed information at the former site of a Confederate memorial in Arlington National Cemetery that criticized the statue’s romanticized vision of slavery (AFP/Getty)

The statue is expected back at the cemetery in 2027.

Last year, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth argued the statue, designed by artist and Confederate veteran Moses Ezekiel, was originally meant to be a “Reconciliation Monument” and was taken down after pressure from “woke lemmings.”

At the time the monument was originally installed, mythologized retellings of the Civil War were growing in popularity, and the Ku Klux Klan racist terror organization was experiencing a resurgence. Many of the nation’s Confederate monuments were not installed around the time of the Civil War, but rather during this period.

The Defense Department website continues to note that Arlington spent decades blocking Black soldiers from being buried in the main cemetery, which was not integrated until 1948.

Advertisement

Ty Seidule, a retired U.S. Army brigadier general who served on a congressionally established commission that reviewed military assets named for the Confederacy for possible removal, called the soon-to-be-restored statue “the cruelest monument that I have ever seen” in an interview with The Washington Post, which reported on the change.

“It is a pro-slavery, anti-United States monument,” he said.

“Arlington National Cemetery’s decision to update website language and signage at Section 16 was made to ensure it was succinct, factual, current and objective,” an Arlington National Cemetery spokesperson said in a statement to The Independent. “This included incorporating updates regarding the pending return of the Moses Ezekiel sculpture, which the Army expects to display in 2027 after it has undergone comprehensive conservation and refurbishment.”

The Trump administration has pushed to restore a Confederate statue in Washington, and has reinstated Confederate-inspired names that were removed from military properties
The Trump administration has pushed to restore a Confederate statue in Washington, and has reinstated Confederate-inspired names that were removed from military properties (Getty)

The Trump administration has worked to restore multiple public-facing assets honoring the Confederacy, including reinstating the names of military bases that had been renamed to strike their Confederate-inspired titles, as well as reinstalling a statue of a Confederate general in Washington, D.C., that had been toppled by Black Lives Matter demonstrators in 2020.

Restoring the statue of Albert Pike, the only outdoor statue of a Confederate leader in the capital, was “morally objectionable,” Eleanor Holmes Norton, the capital’s non-voting delegate to Congress, told The Associated Press at the time.

Advertisement

The Trump administration has also restored a portrait of Confederate general Robert E. Lee to its place in the library at the West Point military academy.

Beyond the military, the Trump administration has pursued a wide-ranging review of Smithsonian-linked museums to purge them of what it calls “improper ideology,” amid complaints from the president that the Smithsonian was too focused on “how bad slavery was.”

Materials touching on the history of slavery and other controversial parts of U.S. history have been removed from national parks and historical sites.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

TOM KELLY: How many of the new luxury hotels in Albania buzzing with British tourists were built with money made from drugs sold in… Britain

Published

on

Albania's five-star Ajman Park is hugely popular with British tourists, but prosecutors say the site is partly bankrolled by millions of pounds made by an Albanian cocaine mafia in the UK

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Virtually trying on clothes using AI can help cut fast-fashion waste, study reveals

Published

on

Virtually trying on clothes using AI can help cut fast-fashion waste, study reveals

Renting clothing used to be restricted to a wedding suit or prom dress, but the options are growing and becoming more popular.

Today, you can rent clothes directly from other people through apps like By Rotation and Hurr, or go straight to high street brands such as John Lewis and Selfridges. Most clothing rental platforms are online only, so shoppers can’t test the fit, sizing or style before committing.

But in a recently published study, I examined, with colleagues, what people thought about renting everyday clothing, and how an AI chatbot with an integrated avatar could change how people choose rental clothing items.

The study used three focus groups and 28 interviews. People said they had a strong desire to use AI tools to see what clothing looked like on them, before paying for the rental.

Advertisement

The chatbot could be used by an online shop to engage with the consumer by asking about size, fit and what the customer wanted the outfit for. The AI chatbot could then save these conversations (if given consumer permission) for use in future sales.

Consumers could upload an image of themselves to the avatar to “try on” a selection of pieces.

One renter from our study called the idea “a welcome need in fashion”. Another said a chatbot could clear up queries about the hidden details of renting clothes, such as unexpected costs or existing stains.

The chatbot could also tap into consumers’ environmental values by sharing sustainability information about the rental item and renting more generally. Many gen Z consumers say they cared about climate change and sustainability, and this could be reflected in their clothing choices.

Advertisement

Moving away from fast fashion to rental requires a significant mindset shift. But as shoppers grow more comfortable with AI, chatbots could guide people toward smarter, more sustainable wardrobes, where they rent more and buy less.




À lire aussi :
Visible mending: why showing off repairs is better than hiding them


One of the reasons why more shoppers might want to think about rental is linked to consumers’ growing awareness of fast fashion’s negative impact on the environment, such as the colossal amount of waste ending up in landfill or polluting developing countries. Over-consumption of clothes means that the sector is responsible for 10% of global CO₂ emissions and about 85% of textiles end up in landfill.

Advertisement
Renting clothes for a big occasion has become more normal.

Rental should keep clothing in circulation for longer. There’s some evidence that by extending a garment’s life, fashion rental could reduce an item of clothing’s carbon, water and waste footprint by 20% to 30%.

Studies also show that chatbots can effectively encourage people to make greener choices. Our paper demonstrates how a chatbot with “green nudges” would share sustainability information. For example, it might say: “Save 2,700 litres of water and 3kg of CO₂ by renting instead of buying.” This data could be certified by an organisation such as the waste charity Wrap to demonstrate the accuracy of the information.

By remembering past interactions, a chatbot could also offer style advice and subtle prompts that encourage shoppers to step out of their comfort zone.

For instance, if you’re going on holiday a chatbot could create a good combination of clothing for you and save a lot of time, one gen Z shopper told us.

Advertisement

But some barriers still keep current consumers from renting outfits. These include hygiene concerns as well as fear of damage and cleaning fees and the feeling that renting isn’t mainstream enough yet.

Our study found shoppers also worried about whether rental clothing catered to different skin tones and colours.

Using AI to promote sustainability raises an obvious paradox. Studies show that the use of AI can have a large environmental impact such as the significant use of energy and water consumption.

But there are already some positive moves that show clothing rental is becoming a more widespread option. In August 2026, global charity Oxfam launched a pilot clothes rental scheme. The charity said it would give people access to special pieces, without adding to the wear-once cycle.

Advertisement

If virtually trying on clothes can make people feel more confident about renting, rather than buying, there is definitely potential to cut the huge amount of environmental damage that the fast fashion world is currently creating. It just depends on whether consumers are ready for that change.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

London has fallen? The truth is revealed in major new study

Published

on

London has fallen? The truth is revealed in major new study

Professor Bobby Duffy, director of KCL’s Policy Institute, said: “London has become a lightning rod in our national debate – deeply connected to arguments about crime, immigration and the direction of the country – with the sense that ‘London has fallen’ now a recurring theme in political, media and social media narratives.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Melania’s top aide reveals their true thoughts about Natalie Harp

Published

on

Melania’s top aide reveals their true thoughts about Natalie Harp

Melania Trump’s top aide has revealed their true thoughts about Natalie Harp, whose close relationship with her boss, Donald Trump, has fueled recent speculation.

Harp, Trump’s executive assistant, has been thrust into the political spotlight in recent weeks with reports that she slept in the locker room at Trump’s Bedminster golf club and even hopped in the trunk of an SUV to stay close to the president.

Senator Jon Ossoff, a Democrat from Georgia up for re-election, made headlines for his quip about Trump, telling a crowd in Atlanta last month, “He doesn’t want to do the job. He wants to build his ballroom and travel with Natalie.”

Marc Beckman, senior advisor to Melania, dismissed any rumors that her husband’s relationship with Harp is anything but above board on an episode of conservative media personality Stella Escobedo’s YouTube show released Tuesday.

Advertisement

“The mainstream media…they’re endlessly obsessed with garbage tabloid gossip about Natalie Harp, who, by the way, is a hard-working, loyal White House aide to President Trump—a cancer survivor—who POTUS helped get off labeled treatment for and saved her life. I mean, what do you make of that?” Escobedo asked Beckman.

Melania Trump’s top aide has revealed their true thoughts about Natalie Harp, whose close relationship with her boss, Donald Trump, has fueled speculation
Melania Trump’s top aide has revealed their true thoughts about Natalie Harp, whose close relationship with her boss, Donald Trump, has fueled speculation (Getty Images)

Harp, who says she was diagnosed with bone cancer, gained national attention in 2019 for crediting Trump for saving her life with a law he signed in 2018 that provided her access to experimental treatments.

“The liberal media is ridiculous. They don’t know anything about the first lady’s personal and private life,” Beckman told Escobedo. “They don’t even take the time to put us on air to cover these incredible achievements that our first lady has accomplished.”

“What they need to do is look in the mirror because they’re all attacking this hardworking, very talented, very intelligent person in Natalie Harp,” he said, adding that the mainstream media is “obsessed with the gossip with the first family. And I can tell you firsthand that it’s time for them to become journalists and stop looking at the gossip.”

Melania's aide accused the mainstream media of 'attacking this hardworking, very talented, very intelligent person in Natalie Harp'
Melania’s aide accused the mainstream media of ‘attacking this hardworking, very talented, very intelligent person in Natalie Harp’ (Getty Images)

The public started to pay closer attention to Harp after The Washington Post reported last month that she was one of the select few who got to ride with Trump in a catering truck that transported them from Air Force One to a smaller jet amid a potential assassination threat from Iran while they were leaving the NATO summit in Turkey. During Trump’s escape, Air Force One, which carried unsuspecting D.C. reporters and senior Trump officials, served as a decoy.

Harp —who reportedly received a $45,000 holiday cash gift from Trump — wrote in a letter to Trump in 2023, “You are all that matters to me,” The New York Times reported shortly after the president’s 2024 election victory in an article announcing that she would follow him to the White House after joining his team in 2022.

Advertisement

While Harp seems to never leave Trump’s side, Melania has been largely absent from the public eye during her husband’s second term.

Over the summer, Melania missed Senator Lindsey Graham’s funeral, the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Dinner, and the dignified transfer of the remains of four service members killed in the Middle East.

NBC News reported on August 17 that Melania has made about half as many public appearances as she did at that point in Trump’s first term.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Team Sussex hit back after Uganda pulls out of the Invictus Games over the ‘Harry-Meghan nonsense’… and claims the move is ‘clearly a consequence’ of King’s letter insisting they are ‘private citizens’

Published

on

Harry and Meghan Markle's team appear to have hit back at Uganda's decision to withdraw from the Invictus Games today (The couple are pictured in April)

The Sussexes appear to have blamed Uganda’s decision to withdraw from the Invictus Games on a letter written by King Charles which insisted they are ‘private citizens’. 

Ugandan General Muhoozi Kainerugaba insisted on Wednesday morning that his nation would not participate in any event without approval from Charles, adding that he felt motivated to quash ‘that Harry-Meghan nonsense’.

The move came less than 48 hours after the King outlined that the duke and duchess are still not working royals despite the couple relocating to the UK a fortnight ago.

The letter was said to have blindsided Harry and Meghan, who claimed they did not have enough time to clarify the King’s points before the guidance was released to the media. 

Advertisement

And the Sussexes have now reportedly blamed Uganda’s decision to withdraw from the Invictus Games on the letter, which was released on His Majesty’s instruction by his Lord Chamberlain on Monday. 

A source close to Harry and Meghan told ITV News tonight: ‘Intended or unintended, this is clearly a consequence of the Lord Chamberlain’s guidance regarding the Duke and Duchess of Sussex that was rushed out without consultation on Monday. 

‘Sadly, the only people who will suffer are the Invictus Games competitors.’

Harry launched the Invictus Games, a Paralympics-style competition, himself in 2014 to aid the recovery of injured or sick military veterans and servicemen. Next year’s edition will take place in Birmingham. 

Advertisement

Harry and Meghan Markle’s team appear to have hit back at Uganda’s decision to withdraw from the Invictus Games today (The couple are pictured in April)

General Muhoozi Kainerugaba of Uganda announced that the country would be withdrawing from the games on Wednesday morning

General Muhoozi Kainerugaba of Uganda announced that the country would be withdrawing from the games on Wednesday morning

The move came less than 48 hours after King Charles reiterated that Harry and Meghan are no longer working royals despite their return to the UK (Charles is pictured last week)

The move came less than 48 hours after King Charles reiterated that Harry and Meghan are no longer working royals despite their return to the UK (Charles is pictured last week)

Advertisement
The letter was released on behalf of the King by Richard Benyon, Charles' Lord Chamberlain

The letter was released on behalf of the King by Richard Benyon, Charles’ Lord Chamberlain

Outlining the reasons for Uganda’s decision, General Kainerugaba, the president’s son, said in a post on X this morning: ‘In order not to be construed as being opposed to His Majesty King Charles III of the United Kingdom, whom we deeply revere, Uganda hereby withdraws from the Invictus Games. 

‘We shall not participate in anything that does not have His Majesty’s approval.’

Asked by The Times why he made the announcement, General Kainerugaba said: ‘I have factions in the Ministry of Defence that support that Harry-Meghan nonsense. I had to quash it straight away. I support the monarch. Period.’

Advertisement

Veteran royal reporter Richard Palmer described the intervention as ‘extraordinary’. 

Two months ago, Uganda’s defence minister Kiryowa Kiwanuka posed for photographs with a smiling Harry at an Invictus Games gathering in London.

During the ceremony at Chatham House on July 7, Uganda was announced as the 26th country to join the competition and the first from east Africa.

Harry posed for a picture with Uganda’s delegates and held a roundel with the nation’s name – making the guests laugh as he jokingly held it like a frisbee. 

Advertisement

Buckingham Palace declined to comment on the ordeal today. But it is understood that the King – who is the Head and Commander-in-Chief of the British Armed Forces – encourages all organisations and endeavours in support of wounded service personnel.  

General Kainerugaba’s father Yoweri Museveni, whom he hopes to succeed as president, described Charles as ‘our good friend in the conservation of nature’ in a condolence message following the death of the late Queen in September 2022.

Mr Museveni also sent a congratulatory message for his coronation eight months later in May 2023, citing ‘brotherly and cordial relations’ between Britain and Uganda.

The late Queen made the last visit by a UK monarch to Uganda in 2007, when she attended a Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Kampala with Philip.

Advertisement

It is understood that Harry and Meghan’s team were notified about the release of Charles’ letter on Monday at 1.59pm, around an hour before it was sent to the media.

Team Sussex sent a response back to Buckingham Palace at 2.19pm asking whether the guidance had already gone out, in the hope of letting the duke and duchess know ahead of the media, and for the team to have the chance to clarify one or two points.  

Meanwhile, Harry, who was pictured at Tower Bridge Studios in London in an Instagram post by the recording studios on Monday, was in a meeting and could not be contacted until 3.09pm when he was told a letter had been drafted and his team were seeking guidance on whether it had been distributed.

Prince Harry meets a delegation from Uganda during at an event at Chatham House in London on July 8 as the country was announced the newest Invictus Games community member

Prince Harry meets a delegation from Uganda during at an event at Chatham House in London on July 8 as the country was announced the newest Invictus Games community member

Advertisement
Prince Harry and Invictus boss Rob Owen, left, present a commemorative plaque in London in July to Kiryowa Kiwanuka, second left, Uganda's defence minister

Prince Harry and Invictus boss Rob Owen, left, present a commemorative plaque in London in July to Kiryowa Kiwanuka, second left, Uganda’s defence minister

Prince Harry and Meghan at a David Foster Foundation event in Canada on August 7

Prince Harry and Meghan at a David Foster Foundation event in Canada on August 7

Team Sussex then received confirmation at 3.11pm it had already been sent to the media. A spokesman for Harry and Meghan said: ‘We were a little surprised not to have been told about this in advance.’

The disclosure of the private behind-the-scenes dealings is likely to fuel speculation of growing tension between the Sussexes and the Royal Household, just two weeks after Harry and Meghan returned to the UK.

Advertisement

The letter was revealed ahead of a reported meeting this week of the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (Ravec), which is responsible for making decisions about royal security.

Harry is waiting to hear the conclusion of the Risk Management Board’s threat assessment and Ravec is expected to decide at the meeting as to whether the Sussex family should be entitled to taxpayer-funded security now they live in the UK.

Lord Benyon’s letter reiterated the King’s stance in August, when Harry and Meghan announced their return, that there would be no alteration to their role and status as private individuals and non-working royals.

It read: ‘It follows that there is no change to the current status of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. Their styles as His and Her Royal Highness remain in abeyance and are not used.

Advertisement

‘The charitable work of the Duke and Duchess is a personal matter for them both and undertaken in their private capacity. In short, their position is akin to private citizens with commercial and charitable interests.’

The Sussexes stepped down as working royals in 2020 and moved to the US for a new life of personal and financial freedom.

But the couple have now moved back to the UK for an ‘extended period’, enrolling their children Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet in British schools.

There are also rumours that Meghan is set for a return to acting following the move

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025