BNK Investment & Securities has signed a strategic agreement with cultural-finance fintech EverTreasure to develop fractional investment and tokenized securities products tied to films, performances, musicals and artworks.

South Korea’s Yonhap News Agency reported on Sept. 14 that the two companies entered a memorandum of understanding covering the development, issuance and distribution of investment products backed by cultural content, with responsibilities divided between the brokerage and EverTreasure.

BNK Investment & Securities will handle the arrangement and distribution of tokenized securities, investor recruitment and advice on compliance with applicable regulations. EverTreasure will identify underlying assets, connect blockchain technology to the products and operate the supporting platform.

The companies plan to work together on due diligence for underlying assets and product structures before potential offerings reach investors. Their cooperation will extend to securing listings on distribution platforms and conducting joint marketing and investor relations activities for institutional investors and high-net-worth clients.

Overseas expansion is part of the agreement, with the companies planning to use their international entities and networks to pursue opportunities outside South Korea.

BNK tokenized securities plan targets cultural assets

The agreement gives BNK Investment & Securities another route into tokenized securities as South Korea prepares to put a formal legal and market structure around blockchain-based financial products.

Cultural assets identified under the partnership include films, performances, musicals and artworks. EverTreasure will be responsible for sourcing competitive assets that could form the basis of fractional or tokenized investment products, while BNK Investment & Securities will provide the securities-market infrastructure needed to bring eligible products to investors.

BNK Investment & Securities CEO Shin Myung-ho described the agreement as a starting point for connecting the value of different types of cultural content with financial products.

“This agreement is a meaningful starting point for providing investors with new investment opportunities by connecting the value of various cultural content with finance,” Shin said.

The brokerage plans to continue finding tokenized securities opportunities backed by competitive real-world assets and gradually expand the financial products and services it offers in the sector, according to the report.

BNK Investment & Securities has already been preparing infrastructure for this market. The brokerage is among the securities companies participating in Koscom’s joint tokenized-securities issuance platform project, which is being developed as financial firms prepare for South Korea’s new regulatory system.

The timing puts the EverTreasure partnership months before South Korea begins the first phase of its tokenized securities rollout in February 2027.

Crypto.news previously reported that the first phase will cover selected privately placed money market funds and bonds, unlisted stocks issued through trust structures and publicly offered fractional investment securities. The planned scope will later extend to other publicly offered securities.

EverTreasure brings YEATU fractional investment platform

EverTreasure is expected to contribute experience developed through YEATU, its fractional investment platform for art and cultural content.

The platform connects investors with projects involving artworks, performances, films and exhibitions. EverTreasure plans to use the content intellectual property sourcing capabilities and investor network built through YEATU to identify products for the BNK partnership.

YEATU says it has handled more than 260 million won in investments as of Dec. 31, 2025, with more than 10,000 members and 6,000 global investors registered on the platform. Its investment offerings cover cultural projects that can generate returns through structures established for individual assets or projects.

For institutional and professional investors, the company provides selected projects involving films, concerts, musicals and fine art. Its process can include due diligence, investment documentation, contract negotiations and monitoring after an investment has been made.

EverTreasure was founded in 2023 and has developed operations around cultural content, valuation and blockchain-based authentication. Its work with BNK will concentrate on finding suitable underlying assets and connecting them with the technical systems required for tokenized products.

The agreement gives both companies defined roles before a product reaches the distribution stage. Asset sourcing and blockchain integration will sit primarily with EverTreasure, while BNK will handle securities issuance arrangements, distribution and investor-facing functions within its regulated business.

South Korea is preparing tokenized securities for 2027

The partnership comes as South Korea moves from limited fractional investment structures toward a regulated market that can accommodate tokenized versions of conventional securities.

The National Assembly passed amendments to the Electronic Securities Act and Capital Markets Act in January 2026, creating the legal basis for securities ownership and issuance information to be recorded through distributed ledger technology.

South Korea has since set Feb. 4, 2027, as the effective date for the framework. The Financial Services Commission released a three-stage roadmap in September under which existing licensed financial companies can handle tokenized securities within the scope of their licenses.

The rules are particularly relevant to fractional investment businesses because investment-contract securities and fractional products will be incorporated into regulated issuance and distribution channels.

Regulators had spent months preparing the operating details. In May, the FSC was working on detailed tokenized securities rules covering issuance, trading, settlement and investor protection before the legal changes take effect.

Market infrastructure is being built at the same time. Samsung SDS won a contract to develop the Korea Securities Depository’s token securities platform, with the system expected to connect distributed-ledger records with the depository’s existing electronic securities infrastructure.

Planned functions include issuance records, circulation checks, rights management and real-time monitoring of token volumes. Completion is expected around the time the amended laws take effect in February.

Korean brokerages build tokenization infrastructure

Securities firms have started preparing their own systems and partnerships before the regulatory framework becomes operational.

Hanwha Investment & Securities recently completed a tokenized securities platform supporting Avalanche and Hyperledger Besu, according to a Sept. 7 report. Development began with blockchain technology company FairSquare Lab in 2025.

Hanwha has backed its infrastructure work with investments in companies operating across tokenization and blockchain markets. The brokerage holds a stake in Securitize and disclosed a 30 billion won investment in Digital Asset, the operator of the institutional-focused Canton Network, in July.

BNK Investment & Securities has taken a partnership-led approach as part of its preparations. In 2024, it signed an agreement with Koscom to cooperate on tokenized-securities platform development, joining brokerages including Kiwoom Securities, Daishin Securities, IBK Investment & Securities and Yuanta Securities that had entered similar arrangements with the financial technology company.

The EverTreasure agreement extends that work into the asset and product side of the market, with cultural intellectual property and other content forming the pool from which potential fractional and tokenized securities products can be developed.

Shin said BNK Investment & Securities intends to continue identifying tokenized-securities businesses using competitive real-world assets and expand its related financial products and services.

Closing the AI gap

EUR/USD sits near 1.1610, just off a one-month low, as tomorrow’s Fed decision looms as the week’s true catalyst. The ECB delivered its second hike of the year on September 10, lifting the deposit rate to 2.50% and warning that Middle East-driven inflation pressures will keep price growth well above target for an extended period. Lagarde called the move a “no-brainer”, yet the euro barely reacted; the hike had been fully priced in, and markets are already pricing more ECB tightening than the central bank’s own projections suggest is needed.

The real action lies across the Atlantic. Thursday’s hotter-than-expected US CPI print pushed September Fed hike odds sharply higher, from 67% to 88% intraday, though the dollar has struggled to fully capitalise as falling oil prices pull Treasury yields back from three-year highs near 4.99%. Adding political noise, President Trump has reportedly pressed Fed Chair Kevin Warsh directly on rate cuts, a claim Trump himself has downplayed, just as the Fed enters its blackout period ahead of Tuesday’s meeting.

The result: an ECB that has already delivered its hawkish surprise with muted market impact, against a Fed whose next move, and its independence from political pressure, could prove far more consequential for EUR/USD heading into Wednesday.

Technical Analysis of EUR/USD

As the EUR/USD chart shows, the pair has recently broken below the ascending trendline that had guided the entire late-July recovery, a genuine shift in structure, and has now also lost the 200-period EMA and the 0.382 Fibonacci confluence near 1.1580, both of which had served as reliable support during the advance. Price is currently testing the 0.5 retracement near 1.1533, a key level in its own right.

Bullish Scenario

Should buyers reclaim the 0.5 support and stage a recovery, the first real test becomes the confluence of the 200-period EMA and the 0.382 retracement near 1.1580, now flipped into resistance. A confirmed break back above that zone would open the path towards retesting the broken ascending trendline, which itself converges near the last resistance on the chart.

Bearish Scenario

Conversely, a decisive break below the 0.5 retracement would confirm the bearish structure taking hold, exposing the 0.618 level near 1.1490, precisely where the broken descending trendline now sits as a potential resistance-turned-support test on the way down. A failure to hold there would risk a deeper slide towards the 0.786 retracement near 1.1430.

With price having just lost both its ascending trendline and the 200-period EMA in quick succession, EUR/USD’s next move looks set to determine whether Wednesday’s Fed decision accelerates this correction, or gives buyers a reason to defend the 0.5 support first.

Trade over 50 forex markets 24 hours a day with FXOpen. Take advantage of low commissions, deep liquidity, and spreads from 0.0 pips (additional fees may apply). Open your FXOpen account now or learn more about trading forex with FXOpen.

This article represents the opinion of the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand only. It is not to be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation with respect to products and services provided by the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand, nor is it to be considered financial advice.

Brazil’s crypto market has entered a regulatory shakeout, with industry estimates indicating that fewer than 10% of companies currently operating in the country are likely to seek Central Bank authorization before an October deadline.

Valor Investe reported that people closely following the licensing process estimate Brazil has between 150 and 200 domestic and foreign companies providing virtual asset services, although some industry estimates put the figure closer to 300. Only 20 to 25 are expected to have the capital, structure or interest needed to apply, while roughly 10 could ultimately secure authorization as digital asset service providers, known locally as PSAVs.

Companies that were providing virtual asset services before the new rules took effect in February have until Oct. 30 to file the first stage of their authorization request. Businesses that do not enter the process by the deadline will have 30 days to stop operating.

The estimates remain unofficial, and the number of applications will not become clear until the filing period closes. Financial institutions that already hold a banking license from the Central Bank do not need a separate authorization to operate in the sector, while fund managers remain under the regulatory framework of Brazil’s Securities and Exchange Commission, or CVM.

Brazil crypto licensing could leave around 10 authorized firms

Several crypto businesses have already restructured or withdrawn from Brazil as the authorization deadline approaches.

Bitnuvem closed its operations this year, citing higher operating costs and regulatory requirements among the reasons for its decision. NovaDAX followed in June, ending its Brazilian operation under an agreement that allowed customers to migrate to Foxbit.

Digitra.com later closed its retail business and directed customers to Foxbit, while BTG Pactual incorporated its Mynt crypto platform into the bank’s existing platforms. The move brought the group’s digital asset activities within BTG Pactual’s existing structure.

Bitso changed its Brazilian retail model in early September through a partnership with Mercado Bitcoin. Retail customers in the country are being directed to invest through Mercado Bitcoin, while Bitso is concentrating its local business on infrastructure and institutional services.

Coinext subsequently announced that it would close its retail operation after nearly a decade, ending crypto trading and custody services for those customers. Coinext Asset, its institutional asset management business, will continue operating.

Unlike some of the earlier exits, Coinext directly cited the new regulatory environment when explaining its decision. The company said it assessed the requirements for remaining in the market, held discussions with potential partners and considered alternatives, but found no viable option.

Industry participants cited by Valor Investe said further customer portfolio transfers are under negotiation, meaning more restructuring announcements could emerge before the transition period ends.

Capital requirements have raised the entry threshold

Capital requirements have become one of the main issues facing companies deciding whether to seek authorization.

During Public Consultation 109/2024, the Central Bank proposed minimum share capital of R$1 million for virtual asset intermediaries such as exchanges, R$2 million for custodians and R$3 million for brokers carrying out both activities.

The final rules announced in November set considerably higher requirements. Depending on a company’s activities and risk profile, required capital can range from R$10.8 million to R$37.2 million.

The authorization process extends beyond capital. Companies must meet requirements covering governance, internal controls, risk management, security, anti-money laundering procedures, technical certification, audits and periodic regulatory reporting.

Brazil approved another set of capital and risk rules in July, as crypto.news previously reported. The requirements begin taking effect in January 2027 and will eventually place virtual asset service providers in the S4 regulatory segment by June 2028. Smaller S5 institutions will no longer be permitted to provide virtual asset services.

The licensing framework already requires applicants and companies seeking license renewals to provide independent audit reports. Auditors must assess areas including anti-money laundering controls, segregation of customer assets, internal risk management and employee compliance programs.

Licensed exchanges face another requirement from Jan. 1, 2027, when they must provide daily asset sufficiency reports showing they hold enough assets to cover operational and security risks.

Regulatory timetable has drawn industry concerns

Ripple’s Latin America public policy and regulatory director, Isabel Sica Longhi, said the pressure was not limited to the substance of the requirements. She pointed to the pace at which new measures were introduced while companies were still adapting to earlier rules.

“The biggest problem was this sequencing, where everything came together very quickly, without even waiting to see whether the risks that the Central Bank intended to address with Resolutions 519, 520 and 521 would actually be addressed before adjusting the rules,” Longhi said, according to Valor Investe.

Executives cited in the report said the Central Bank had set a high regulatory threshold after problems involving fintech companies. Sources pointed to fraud, cyberattacks, third-party use of accounts and weak control structures as issues that contributed to the regulator’s approach.

Security requirements have continued to expand. In August, the Central Bank introduced rules requiring certain crypto transfers above $10,000 to be held for as long as 24 hours from Jan. 1, 2027 when funds are being sent to foreign virtual asset providers or self-custody wallets. Providers may release transactions earlier after completing the required risk review.

The regulator has separately developed a real-time crypto threat alert system with Hypernative after attackers converted part of the proceeds from a major cyberattack into cryptocurrency. Foxbit and Mercado Bitcoin were among the companies preparing to participate in the threat monitoring network.

Smaller crypto companies face higher compliance costs

Companies expected to remain in Brazil have not uniformly opposed tighter oversight. One executive quoted by Valor Investe described compliance as a necessary part of operating in a regulated market, saying that “regulation is not something you cry about, you comply with it.”

The executive said clear rules and Central Bank supervision were necessary for the sector to mature, while arguing that the chosen calibration could reduce innovation by excluding smaller companies and business models unable to absorb regulatory costs.

Longhi similarly described some reduction in the number of companies as a natural part of regulation but drew a distinction between removing unsuitable operators and excluding businesses simply because of their size.

“The thinning of the market is natural and should happen anyway,” she said. “What is not natural, if it happens, is preventing the market from existing and removing small participants simply because they are small participants.”

Brazilian banks, meanwhile, have been expanding access to digital assets while operating under their existing regulatory structures. Itaú, Bradesco, Santander, Banco do Brasil and Nubank have expanded crypto services since 2025, while Central Bank filings from March showed that the banks held no virtual assets on their own balance sheets. Nubank offered 28 digital assets to more than 7 million crypto customers, while Itaú offered 15 assets through its investment platform.

Mercado Bitcoin has continued expanding during the regulatory transition. Tether invested $20 million in the company in July as part of a strategic financing round focused on tokenized assets, payments, lending and onchain capital markets. Mercado Bitcoin said at the time that it served 4.5 million users and had issued more than R$2 billion in tokenized assets.

The final number of companies entering the Central Bank authorization process will become clearer after Oct. 30. Until then, industry participants cited by Valor Investe expect further closures, customer migrations, mergers and partnerships as companies decide whether to seek their own authorization or operate through other regulated structures.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has ruled out a 2026 initial public offering, citing unfinished safety and alignment work while leaving the company without a confirmed listing date.

Fortune reported on Sept. 12 that Altman called the current period an “ill-advised moment” to go public and said OpenAI felt no pressure to pursue an offering.

Asked whether an IPO had moved from 2026 to 2027, Altman replied, “I would say not 2026.” He said OpenAI had substantial work remaining on safety, alignment and cooperation between governments and the AI industry.

His answer rules out a listing this year but does not establish a 2027 offering. OpenAI has not publicly disclosed a listing date, stock exchange, ticker, price range or number of shares to be offered.

OpenAI IPO has no confirmed 2027 date

Some reports have described 2027 as the earliest possible date for an OpenAI IPO. Altman did not commit to that timetable during the interview. He said the company would go public when its business was ready and when conditions surrounding the technology supported that decision.

The distinction is important to the factual record. OpenAI did not have a publicly announced 2026 offering that it formally postponed. The company remains privately held, and no publicly available registration statement identifies an active OpenAI stock sale.

Media reports have previously linked the company to a possible listing carrying a valuation of up to $1 trillion. OpenAI has not confirmed that estimate. Any valuation attached to a future offering would depend on its financial results, investor demand, capital structure and the terms disclosed at the time.

A traditional U.S. IPO would require a registration statement containing business, financial, management and risk information. The SEC says Form S-1 is the basic registration form available to companies and must contain a prospectus with audited financial statements.

OpenAI has not announced when it might begin such a process. Altman’s comments leave 2027 possible, but describing that year as a confirmed IPO schedule would go beyond his statement.

Safety work takes priority over listing preparations

During the Fortune interview, Altman connected the decision to rapid advances in artificial intelligence and unresolved questions about controlling increasingly capable systems. He said safety standards were not yet ready for the industry to push capabilities much further without additional safeguards.

OpenAI has discussed pausing at certain capability levels, Altman said, giving researchers and institutions time to improve alignment measures. He did not identify a model release, capability threshold or binding protocol that would trigger a pause.

The CEO called for cooperation among competing AI developers and governments. Any international arrangement remains prospective because OpenAI has not released a signed agreement, participating organizations or enforcement terms.

Altman framed the IPO decision as part of OpenAI’s ability to place its mission ahead of immediate shareholder returns. A public company would face reporting duties and market expectations, though he did not claim those requirements made responsible AI development impossible.

No direct market reaction exists for OpenAI shares because the company is not publicly traded. Private-market transactions and reported valuation estimates do not provide the continuous price discovery associated with a listed stock.

Independent evaluator proposal awaits details

Altman’s remarks followed a proposal from Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei calling for slower development of frontier AI systems. Amodei urged laboratories to provide qualified independent evaluators with access resembling that available to employees.

Altman publicly supported the evaluator proposal and said OpenAI would adopt a similar measure. The company has not yet published the evaluators’ selection process, technical access, confidentiality rules or authority over model deployments.

Independent access could involve exposure to internal models, testing tools and security-sensitive information. OpenAI has not specified how it would separate external review from access controls protecting proprietary technology and user data.

Elon Musk supported Amodei’s warning with the brief statement, “Dario is right.” His endorsement did not include a technical framework or a commitment describing how xAI would apply the proposed controls.