Crypto World
Bitwise CIO revises outlook after CLARITY vote
Bitwise Chief Investment Officer Matt Hougan has revised his view of the CLARITY Act setback after Bitcoin rallied from $57,950 in July to above $80,000 before the Senate failed to advance the crypto market structure bill on Sept. 15.
Summary
- Bitcoin climbed above $80,000 before the Senate rejected CLARITY, prompting Bitwise to revise its outlook.
- The Senate rejected cloture 49-50, leaving the crypto market structure bill short of sixty votes.
- SEC and CFTC leaders say existing authority still allows additional crypto rulemaking without new legislation.
- Robinhood launched its chain, while Morgan Stanley launched Solana and Ether exchange-traded products in July.
- Bitcoin traded near $76,300 Thursday after the vote-driven selloff and Wednesday’s Fed rate increase decision.
Bitwise said in Hougan’sSept. 16 CIO memo that he no longer considers another six weeks of difficult crypto trading the most likely result after the legislation stalled, though his expectation that the current crypto rally can continue remains an investment outlook rather than a confirmed market outcome.
Hougan had previously compared the legislation to crypto’s “Punxsutawney Phil,” predicting a longer market winter if Congress failed to complete the bill. After reviewing Bitcoin’s price action and continued financial-sector product launches, he now describes the Senate setback as a “speed bump, not a roadblock.”
Bitcoin’s rally changed Hougan’s CLARITY outlook
Hougan’s revised position centers on Bitcoin’s performance while expectations for the legislation deteriorated. Bitwise data placed Bitcoin’s July 1 low near $57,950 before the asset climbed above $80,000 on Sept. 4. Over the same period, Bitwise said Polymarket pricing for the CLARITY Act becoming law in 2026 dropped from 39% to 18%.
Hougan argued that the opposing moves weakened his earlier assumption that passage was necessary for the market recovery to continue. The price relationship does not establish that declining legislative odds caused Bitcoin’s advance, and Bitwise did not present it as proof of future performance.
The Senate then rejected cloture on the motion to proceed with H.R. 3633 on Sept. 15. The official Senate roll call recorded 49 votes in favor and 50 against, with one senator not voting. Sixty votes were required to invoke cloture and move toward debate.
The action was not a final vote on passage. Republican Sens. Susan Collins, Josh Hawley, Jerry Moran and Thom Tillis voted against cloture. Tillis changed his vote after the outcome became clear, a procedural move that preserved the possibility of seeking reconsideration. No date for another Senate vote has been announced.
As crypto.news reported after the vote, the failure stopped the Senate from opening debate at that stage while leaving the legislation unresolved rather than formally defeated through a final passage vote.
Wall Street crypto projects continued before the Senate vote
Hougan cited several institutional developments to support his view that large financial companies have not waited for market structure legislation before building crypto products.
Robinhood launched the public mainnet of Robinhood Chain on July 1. The company describes the network as a permissionless, Ethereum-compatible Layer 2 built for financial services and tokenized assets. Its second-quarter regulatory filing confirms that Robinhood Chain moved from its February public testnet into mainnet during July.
Robinhood paired the launch with Stock Tokens for eligible users in more than 120 countries through Robinhood Wallet. Robinhood says approximately 200 stock tokens were available by September.
Morgan Stanley’s Solana product had moved even further than an application by the time of Hougan’s memo. The SEC declared the Morgan Stanley Solana Trust registration effective on July 23, and Morgan Stanley Investment Management formally launched the MSOL product on NYSE Arca on July 28 alongside its Ether product, MSSE.
Morgan Stanley said both exchange-traded products charge a 0.14% sponsor fee and seek exposure to SOL and Ether, with staking incorporated into their structures. Crypto.news reported on the July launch, correcting earlier descriptions of Morgan Stanley as merely seeking approval for a Solana fund.
DTCC supplied another example. On July 15, the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation processed live production transactions using securities converted into DTC-tokenized assets. The transactions included equity trades, U.S. Treasury and repo activity, securities lending, collateral pledges and token transfers.
DTCC said roughly 40 firms participated in the production event, which came ahead of the planned October 2026 launch of its Tokenization Service. In related coverage, crypto.news reported that participants included firms such as BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs and other financial institutions.
SEC and CFTC rulemaking can continue without the bill
Hougan’s second argument concerns regulatory authority already held by the SEC and CFTC. He characterized the current leadership of both agencies as supportive of crypto-market development and said companies have taken comfort from that policy direction. His description of the agencies as “pro-crypto” is Bitwise’s characterization, not a statutory classification.
SEC Chairman Paul Atkins has separately said congressional legislation remains preferable because agency rules can later be changed. In an Aug. 18 statement, Atkins called legislation “indispensable” for creating rules durable enough to survive a future change in regulatory leadership.
The SEC has nevertheless started its own rulemaking. Its proposed Regulation Crypto Assets, published Aug. 18, would create tailored exemptions for certain investment-contract offerings involving crypto assets and a conditional safe harbor addressing when a crypto asset would no longer be treated as subject to an investment contract. The proposal remains open for public comment through Oct. 20 and is not a final rule.
CFTC Chairman Michael Selig took a similar position after the Senate vote. In a Sept. 16 statement reported by The Block, Selig said the agency was “locked in and ready to ship its rules for the new frontier of finance” using its existing statutory authority.
The CFTC had already created an Innovation Task Force in March to work on crypto assets, blockchain, artificial intelligence and prediction markets. Selig said at the time that the group would coordinate with the SEC while developing rules within the commission’s existing mandate.
Agency authority still has limits. Hougan acknowledged that only Congress can provide the CFTC with the full spot-market jurisdiction contemplated by the CLARITY Act. Administrative rules can face court challenges and may be amended or reversed by future commissions, while legislation would create a different level of statutory permanence.
Former CFTC Chairman J. Christopher Giancarlo similarly said the two agencies could continue writing rules within existing authority while Congress remains divided.
Bitcoin fell after the vote as macro pressure increased
Markets reacted negatively immediately after the Senate action. Reuters reported Bitcoin falling roughly 4% to around $75,908, while Coinbase and Circle shares dropped close to 9% as investors reacted to the failure to advance the bill.
Crypto derivatives markets recorded another layer of selling. Crypto.news reported that exchanges liquidated roughly $571 million in long positions over 24 hours, including close to $190 million each in Bitcoin and Ether longs.
Hougan said the legislative result was not the only factor affecting prices. His memo cited interest-rate and oil concerns as possible contributors to the decline, while describing additional volatility as a risk to his bullish investment thesis.
The macro backdrop changed again on Sept. 16 when the Federal Reserve raised its benchmark rate to 3.75%–4.00%, its first increase since 2023. Reuters reported that the unanimous decision came as policymakers responded to persistent inflation and rising energy costs, with most officials projecting at least one more increase during 2026.
By Sept. 17, CoinGecko showed Bitcoin near $76,274, up roughly 0.5% over 24 hours but down around 2.1% over seven days. The price remained well above Bitwise’s $57,950 July starting point while trading below the early-September level above $80,000.
Hougan’s expectation that the crypto bull market can continue without the CLARITY Act remains Bitwise’s market forecast. The SEC’s Regulation Crypto Assets proposal is still accepting comments through Oct. 20, while the Senate has not scheduled another cloture vote on H.R. 3633.
Crypto World
Sam Bankman-Fried’s $500 Million Investment Still Haunts Anthropic
Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) led a $580 million funding round into Anthropic in April 2022. Critics say the donor network he championed still amplifies the artificial intelligence (AI) safety message his money paid for.
The FTX founder holds no stake today. Prosecutors forced a sale of his shares to repay creditors. The effective altruism network he backed, which funds causes it judges most urgent, stayed in place.
Where Bankman-Fried’s Anthropic Money Went
Bankman-Fried put roughly $500 million into Anthropic in 2021 for about an 8% stake. Anthropic builds the Claude chatbot.
Months after the April 2022 round, FTX collapsed. He was convicted of defrauding investors of $3 billion and is serving 25 years.
BeInCrypto reported in June that the estate sold that Anthropic stake for about $1.3 billion in 2024. It would be worth more than $30 billion at Anthropic’s latest $380 billion valuation.
Where the Network’s Money Goes Today
Dustin Moskovitz, a Facebook co-founder, invested in Anthropic in 2021. He sits on the board of Coefficient Giving, the grantmaker formerly called Open Philanthropy.
Coefficient is a major backer of the Tarbell Center for AI Journalism, which pays more than 80 reporters at outlets including Time, Bloomberg, and The Guardian. It says they are independent.
Longview Philanthropy, another effective altruism group, funds Model Evaluation and Threat Research (METR), which grades frontier models on risk. Its head, Paul Christiano, once roomed with Anthropic chief executive Dario Amodei.
Anthropic separately pays about 1,000 people trained on Claude to embed inside more than 400 nonprofits. It calls the program Claude Corps.
Critics Who Say Amodei Borrowed the Playbook
Brian Chau, a machine learning engineer, founded the AI news site Effort. He told the New York Post that Amodei now seeks safety rules that would also shield an established company.
“So it’s no surprise that he’s now copying literally the exact same tactics used by Sam Bankman-Fried in order to achieve regulatory monopoly.”
Chau said those programs were once named effective altruism as their purpose. The wording changed to AI safety after Bankman-Fried’s arrest in December 2022.
Amodei published a policy essay in June seeking mandatory third-party testing of frontier models. He did not address the capture argument.
The Fight Amodei’s Push Landed In
Amodei’s remarks come as Washington moves the other way. Trump signed an order in December 2025 to preempt state AI laws and has called safety fears a hoax.
Some members of Congress say the burden of AI safety now rests on developers themselves.
Anthropic nearly tripled its federal lobbying spending to $3.53 million in the first half of 2026.
The post Sam Bankman-Fried’s $500 Million Investment Still Haunts Anthropic appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
SEC rolls out ‘innovation exemption’ for tokenized securities trading venues
The regulator explicitly excluded synthetic security tokens that are derivatives and don’t provide ownership of the shares. The SEC only allows tokens that represent real ownership of the underlying stock, which Atkins said “must provide holders with the same rights and privileges as the traditional securities, including rights to receive dividends and exercise voting rights.”
That may exclude derivatives and debt instruments offered in many of the offshore products, such as from Robinhood.
The time-limited innovation exemption doesn’t require the SEC to formally designate the venues. Instead, any platform that believes it can meet the SEC’s definition and comply with the conditions only needs to provide notice before opening the doors of a tokenization operation, according to the agency.
5 years, to start
Atkins acknowledged the temporary nature of the policy, which he said lets firms operate “in a permissioned environment today while the commission considers the need for additional action to facilitate onchain trading.” He said the measure “must be followed by durable rulemaking to ensure that onchain markets remain a viable pathway as our capital markets continue to evolve.”
Tokenization has become one of Wall Street’s biggest blockchain experiments, giving major weight to the SEC’s opening move. The basic idea is to take familiar assets such as stocks, bonds or investment funds and represent ownership of them on a blockchain, potentially allowing them to move more easily between investors and financial platforms.
Crypto World
Ripple News: MPP AI kit as XRP Payment Demand Rises
Ripple brings news with updated XRPL AI Starter Kit to version 1.1, adding support for the Machine Payments Protocol, or MPP, a standard co-authored by Stripe and Tempo for software agents that pay for services without a checkout flow. The release also adds Open Wallet Standard support, giving developers a common interface for managing wallets across multiple blockchains.
Now, developers can build AI agents that pay for data, computing, and other online services using XRP or RLUSD, Ripple’s dollar-pegged stablecoin. That matters structurally more than commercially at this stage. The software remains in beta, and Ripple’s announcement names no commercial customers using the new MPP integration and discloses no payment volume for it.
This is Ripple building out payment infrastructure ahead of demonstrated demand.
MPP works on a simple loop: a service responds to an agent’s request with a price, the agent authorizes payment, and the service delivers the requested resource. No human approves a checkout screen; the transaction is just another step in the agent’s workflow.
Ripple isn’t betting the house on one standard. It already added support for x402, a separate web-payment protocol, back in June, and MPP now joins it rather than replacing it. That’s a hedge, not a commitment to a winner, and it reflects an environment where the agentic-payments space hasn’t settled on a dominant rail.
The same logic underpins why AI systems are increasingly being used to assess XRP’s prospects in the first place: utility narratives now compete directly with speculative ones for the token’s valuation case.
Earn $50 and Enter $300K Prize Draw on EdgeX
How the Payment Mechanics Actually Work?
A business already building on Stripe and Tempo’s open protocol can now offer XRP or RLUSD payments through Ripple’s integration without re-architecting around a new blockchain. One-time payments support both XRP and issued tokens, such as RLUSD, out of the gate.
Ongoing payment sessions are more limited: they currently require XRP specifically. The intended use case is an agent depositing XRP once, running hundreds of paid queries, and authorizing incremental spending after each response, with the provider collecting the accumulated total without putting every individual query on-chain.
Extending that session model to stablecoins depends on a proposed ledger upgrade that hasn’t shipped yet, so RLUSD-denominated payment channels aren’t live.
The Open Wallet Standard piece addresses a different problem: key management across chains. It lets agents request transactions without directly accessing private keys, with safeguards such as spending limits and approved destinations built into the interface.
Trade XRP on Bybit and Get a Chance to Win Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop
Ripple News: Positioning and What’s Still Missing
Supporting both x402 and MPP gives developers a route onto the XRP Ledger regardless of which payment standard they picked first. That’s the real strategic value here, beyond the news: Ripple is inserting XRP and RLUSD into applications whose developers chose their payment protocol before choosing a blockchain, rather than trying to convince them to adopt XRPL-specific tooling from scratch.
So, what’s missing? The kit remains beta software. No named commercial customer is using the MPP integration, and Ripple has published no payment-volume figures to indicate actual usage.
The near-term catalyst to watch isn’t this release itself but whether the proposed ledger upgrade enabling stablecoin payment sessions actually ships, and whether any developer building on MPP or x402 discloses real transaction flow through XRPL. Until then, this is Ripple securing optionality in a standards race that hasn’t been decided, not confirmation that agents are paying in XRP at any meaningful scale.
Discover: The Best Token Presales
The post Ripple News: MPP AI kit as XRP Payment Demand Rises appeared first on Cryptonews.
Crypto World
Stock Market Today: Dow Rises In Day 2 Fed Reaction; Generac, Nebius, Bloom Energy, SpaceX Are Early Movers
Futures for the Dow Jones industrial average and other major indexes rose strongly early Thursday, rebounding with the help of a better-than-expected reports on jobs and manufacturing after declining in the prior session on hawkish comments from the Federal Reserve. Crude oil prices and Treasury yields retreated on the stock market today. Generac (GNRC) and Nebius (NBIS) were big winners…
Copyright ©2026 Investor’s Business Daily, LLC. All rights reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
Crypto World
Former Hut 8 CEO Jaime Leverton to lead Zcash miner Fortitude ahead of Nasdaq debut
Leverton most recently led institutional digital-asset manager ReserveOne. She previously served as CEO of bitcoin miner Hut 8, overseeing its merger with US Bitcoin Corp. and its transition from a Canadian-listed miner into a U.S.-domiciled company with bitcoin mining and high-performance computing operations.
Her appointment comes as Fortitude expands its exposure to Zcash, whose ZEC token has risen more than 2,000% over the past year. Its market capitalization is roughly $21 billion.
Fortitude mined 72,696 ZEC during the six months through June, about 28% of the network’s total production during that period. The company reported second-quarter revenue of $20.9 million.
The miner operates more than 60 megawatts of power capacity across seven sites in South Dakota, Nebraska, Texas and New York.
“Fortitude is taking a differentiated approach to mining,” Leverton said in the release, pointing to the company’s combination of owned power, mining sites and in-house operations.
The company describes itself as a “venture mining” platform that allocates capital across proof-of-work networks while maintaining a primary focus on Zcash. The company is wholly owned by Barry Silbert’s Digital Currency Group.
Childs said she will concentrate on mining operations, fleet and infrastructure strategy, and industry relationships in her new role as COO.
Crypto World
NEAR crosses $70 million in confidential TVL, unlocking first incentive drop
NEAR has surpassed $70 million in confidential total value locked, automatically triggering the first snapshot under its [email protected] incentive program and setting aside 333,333 milestone tokens for eligible users.
Summary
- NEAR’s confidential TVL has crossed $70 million, triggering the first snapshot under the [email protected] incentive program.
- The snapshot allocates 333,333 milestone tokens to eligible users who maintain more than $100 in confidential balances and have an active swap history.
- Rewards remain locked until NEAR’s three day VWAP reaches at least $3.33, while individual wallets are capped at 2% of the distribution.
- Confidential Intents currently supports private execution across more than 30 connected blockchains.
According to a Sept. 17 announcement from NEAR shared with crypto.news, the milestone was reached through Confidential Intents, its private execution system for cross chain transactions, with the snapshot determining eligibility for the first reward distribution.
Users who qualify for the first drop must maintain more than $100 in confidential balances and have an active swap history. The milestone tokens will remain locked until NEAR’s three day volume weighted average price reaches at least $3.33, when they can convert into NEAR.
The incentive program places a 2% cap on the amount that can be allocated to any single wallet. NEAR said the restriction is intended to limit concentration and spread the distribution across more participants.
NEAR confidential TVL triggers first token snapshot
Confidential Intents routes transactions through a private NEAR shard, which NEAR says removes transactions from public mempool exposure and protects users from front running, strategy leakage and other forms of maximal extractable value.
The system is designed to provide confidential execution without relying on the computational requirements associated with zero knowledge systems, according to NEAR. Its confidential liquidity can be used for high volume swaps across connected blockchains without publicly linking the activity to the party behind the transaction.
Live data cited by NEAR showed confidential TVL crossing the $70 million threshold required for the first phase of the [email protected] program. Independent NEAR Intents tracking data showed the figure at approximately $70.8 million on Sept. 17.
Alex Shevchenko, general manager of NEAR Intents, said the growth showed demand for confidential execution was extending beyond a specialized segment of the market.
“Confidentiality is quickly becoming a core requirement for the industry, and NEAR is becoming the rail to make it the new default,” Shevchenko said.
He said combining cross chain liquidity with protection against front running, strategy leakage and other forms of MEV gives institutions and decentralized finance users a way to transact at scale while retaining privacy.
The $70 million threshold closes the first phase of the [email protected] campaign. NEAR said Confidential Intents currently supports execution across more than 30 connected blockchains.
NEAR Intents expands cross chain infrastructure
NEAR has been building Intents as an abstraction layer for transactions that move across different blockchain networks. Instead of requiring a user or application to manually determine how a transaction should move between chains, users specify the intended outcome and solvers compete to execute it.
As crypto.news previously reported, NEAR has positioned Intents as part of its infrastructure for autonomous AI agents that may need to transact across several blockchains without separately managing assets and transaction routes on each network.
By June, cumulative fees generated by NEAR Intents had surpassed $35.4 million, while average daily fees during that month were above $125,000. The protocol has connected the system with its plan to provide a common settlement layer for cross chain activity and software agents.
Confidential Intents extends that system by placing privacy around execution. NEAR has developed the feature alongside other privacy tools for areas including onchain treasury management, payroll, multisig operations and balance management.
The network’s cross chain infrastructure has continued to gain integrations. An Aptos integration with NEAR Intents gave users access to one click transfers involving assets such as Bitcoin, Ethereum and XRP across more than 20 blockchains. Developers were given access through the 1 Click Swap API, which allows applications to integrate Intents without requiring users to manually operate bridges.
NEAR has tied the infrastructure to its work around AI agents, where software may need to execute payments or trades without manually navigating individual blockchain networks.
Confidential execution fits into NEAR’s AI strategy
Privacy has become part of NEAR’s push to build infrastructure for autonomous agents. The network argues that software handling payments, trading strategies and other financial activity may need to keep transaction details or user information from becoming publicly visible.
In July, NEAR introduced a staking based AI payment system that lets users lock NEAR to receive monthly compute credits for its AI platform. The tokens are not spent and can be recovered when users unstake them.
At launch, the mechanism covered 43 AI models available through NEAR AI, including models from OpenAI, Anthropic and Google. NEAR said users could access confidential AI inference and hosted autonomous agents without providing a credit card or maintaining a conventional cloud billing account.
The protocol has separately introduced automatic anonymization for personally identifiable information contained in prompts sent to closed AI models. NEAR said the system removes sensitive information before prompts reach external inference infrastructure.
A network upgrade released in June introduced dynamic resharding, allowing blockchain capacity to adjust as transaction demand changes. The same release introduced post quantum secure signatures, giving u
Crypto World
Where Do Latin America's Dollars Actually Live?
Washington’s stablecoin debate is about characteristics: who can issue one, what has to back it, and how it gets audited. The Federal Reserve, the US central bank, and the OCC, the regulator that supervises the country’s national banks, cannot simply accept that a token is worth one dollar; they have to control who is allowed to make that promise.
Because a dollar-pegged token is, in a real sense, a representation of the country’s own currency.
Latin America is regulating something structurally different: access to a currency none of its governments control. For a saver in Buenos Aires, Bogota, or Mexico City, whether the token behind their savings is USDC, USDT, or whatever wins that fight barely matters, as long as it holds its peg and the custodian is solvent.
That asymmetry explains a mistake regional regulators keep edging toward: importing Washington’s fight over issuer specs, when the real problem here is different, and harder.
The real question is not which stablecoin wins. It is where the dollars backing it should live.
Offshore Dollars Become a Domestic Policy Problem
A dollar in a reserve account in New York does the same job, on a user’s screen, as a dollar in a reserve account in Buenos Aires or Sao Paulo. But for a regulator in a region where hard currency has been the state’s scarcest resource for decades, those two dollars are not equivalent. One is available to the local financial system under stress. The other is not.
Argentina remains the world’s most dollarized crypto market by share of volume, but the pattern is regional: in Brazil, institutional stablecoin volume jumped from 5% of local crypto flows in 2024 to 84% in 2025, and Mexico’s Senate is now debating a bill to regulate peso-pegged stablecoins.
A rising share of household and corporate dollars sitting in instruments reserved entirely offshore will, sooner or later, look like a policy problem worth solving, not a market outcome to shrug at.
Should Latin America Force Some of Those Dollars Back Home?
This has a preview. In July, Kenya’s Treasury proposed requiring stablecoin issuers to hold at least 30 percent of customer funds in banks domiciled in the country. No Latin American regulator has proposed anything like it yet, but the logic behind Kenya’s rule, chronic dollar scarcity meeting a financial system trying to claw back some claim on flows it can no longer prevent, is arguably more acute in Argentina or Venezuela than in Kenya. I would be surprised if nobody in the region’s finance ministries is already sketching something similar.
I do not think this is an easy call. None of the region’s frameworks so far, not Argentina’s PSAV regime, not Brazil’s rules in force since February, not the bill in Mexico’s Senate, have tried to solve this yet, and one of their underappreciated virtues is that they have not.
My read: mandating local reserves would fragment liquidity that today lives almost entirely in USDT and USDC, strip domestically-backed instruments of the convertibility that makes them useful for remittances, and likely push demand toward unregulated rails instead of compliant ones. That defeats the point of the rule.
The alternative worth building toward is coexistence: locally-reserved and offshore-reserved dollar instruments operating under supervision, moving freely between each other, letting users decide where their dollars live.
Whether the region gets there, or defaults to Kenya’s blunter instrument once dollarization is impossible to ignore, will decide how much of Latin America’s dollar savings stays inside a supervised system, and how much goes looking for the door.
The post Where Do Latin America's Dollars Actually Live? appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Zcash Surges 20% After Paradigm Founder Discloses ZEC Holding
Zcash spiked sharply in the past day, with the privacy-focused cryptocurrency rising by roughly 20% over 24 hours after Paradigm co-founder Matt Huang disclosed that the firm made an unspecified purchase of ZEC. The move follows a broader month-long rally in which Zcash has vastly outpaced Bitcoin, according to CoinGecko price data.
ZEC was trading around $1,338 at last look on Thursday, as the token built on gains that would bring its one-month increase to about 160%, compared with Bitcoin’s 18.2% over the same period, per CoinGecko.
Key takeaways
- Zcash’s surge followed Matt Huang’s disclosure that Paradigm is both a ZODL investor and a ZEC token holder.
- ZEC is up about 160% over 30 days, versus Bitcoin’s 18.2%, based on CoinGecko’s data.
- Zcash’s architecture uses zero-knowledge proofs to support shielded transactions that hide addresses and transaction amounts.
- Privacy coins have generally been outperforming the broader crypto market, with Glassnode data pointing to a large relative lift for the sector.
Paradigm ties spotlight Zcash’s on-chain privacy narrative
The catalyst for Zcash’s latest leg higher was a post by Matt Huang on Wednesday in which he revealed that Paradigm is an investor in the Zcash Open Development Lab (ZODL) and that the firm holds ZEC. The update reframed ZEC’s recent performance through the lens of long-term ecosystem support rather than short-term trading momentum.
Zcash is designed to enable shielded transactions—transfers where the sender and recipient addresses and the transaction amounts are concealed—using zero-knowledge proofs. Those privacy mechanics have been a consistent part of Zcash’s market identity, and the renewed attention around ZEC comes as traders look for assets that can stand apart from broader market direction.
In the same context, Huang characterized Zcash as a “private complement to Bitcoin” and emphasized the importance of sustained funding for development.
Funding the protocol: ZODL and Zcash’s developer model
Zcash’s institutional momentum is not entirely new. Paradigm’s involvement in the ecosystem was already public earlier this year, when ZODL announced a seed round of more than $25 million that included Paradigm, a16z crypto, Coinbase Ventures, and Winklevoss Capital.
Huang also pointed to Zcash’s inflation-funded developer fund, arguing that ongoing support matters as new threats emerge alongside advances in computing. He tied that view to the direction of cyber capabilities increasingly shaped by AI as well as the long-term implications of quantum computing.
Beyond funding, he highlighted governance questions. Huang said he supports combining Zcash coin voting with other forms of governance to reduce unpredictability for the network when ZEC is viewed as a monetary asset.
Macro backdrop: risk assets buoyed as rates rise ends a long pause
ZEC’s climb unfolded alongside strength in the broader crypto market. The timing also coincided with a Federal Reserve move that raised interest rates by 25 basis points to 3.75%-4%—the first increase since 2023—according to the Fed’s press release.
While tighter policy typically pressures speculative assets, crypto markets have often remained sensitive to how investors interpret the path of future rates rather than the immediate change. In this case, Zcash’s rally suggests that token-specific catalysts—especially those tied to institutional involvement and the privacy value proposition—can dominate even when macro conditions are mixed.
Privacy sector momentum: Zcash stands out within a wider trend
Zcash’s outperformance sits within a broader resurgence for privacy-related assets. Glassnode data shared on X indicated the privacy coin sector was 213% above its level at Bitcoin’s October 2025 peak. A separate “basket excluding ZEC” was up about 85% over the past year, per the same Glassnode post.
That comparison matters for traders trying to separate “industry beta” from asset-specific demand. If the broader privacy category is rising, ZEC benefits from sector tailwinds—yet its magnitude over the last month appears larger than the average move of peers, reinforcing the idea that Huang’s disclosure and Paradigm’s positioning added incremental attention and buying interest.
Zcash’s technical positioning also remains central to the story. Shielded transactions using zero-knowledge proofs are designed to make it difficult to trace addresses and amounts in normal transaction history, a key reason privacy assets repeatedly attract both supporters and regulatory scrutiny across markets.
Earlier coverage from Cointelegraph referenced Zcash’s Ironwood work and the protocol changes aimed at strengthening privacy and addressing proof-related concerns (including claims about “undetectable counterfeiting bugs”). While that background doesn’t directly explain Thursday’s jump, it provides context for why Zcash tends to attract investors who follow privacy engineering rather than purely speculative narratives.
Looking ahead, investors will likely focus on whether Huang’s disclosure leads to sustained inflows rather than a short-lived reaction, and whether ZEC’s momentum holds against the broader privacy basket. With the Fed setting a new tone after a long stretch of unchanged rates, traders will also be watching for how macro expectations interact with privacy-sector demand—especially if more institutional disclosures or ecosystem funding signals emerge from Zcash’s development partners.
Crypto World
Bitcoin price forms recovery setup above $75K support
Bitcoin price stabilized above $76,000 after buyers defended the $75,000 area, while improving 4-hour momentum and nearby liquidity at $77,000 pointed to a possible short-term rebound.
Summary
- Bitcoin recovered to $76,362 after falling toward $75,000 during the latest sell-off.
- The daily price remains below the Bollinger Band midpoint at $78,028.
- 4-hour MACD momentum improved, but the Supertrend stays bearish below $78,597.
- Liquidation clusters near $77,000, $78,000, and $80,000 could attract price during a rebound.
Bitcoin price action today
According to data from crypto.news, Bitcoin (BTC) price was trading near $76,362 at the time of writing, up about 0.2% on the day after moving between $76,055 and $76,774. The latest session followed a decline that briefly pushed the asset below $75,000 before buyers stepped in.
The rebound came after the Federal Reserve delivered its first interest-rate increase in three years. The central bank raised its benchmark range by 25 basis points to 3.75%–4.00%, while projections showed 16 of 18 officials expected at least one more increase before the end of 2026.
The rate decision had largely been priced into markets, helping Bitcoin avoid another sharp decline during Fed Chair Kevin Warsh’s press conference. Bitcoin instead protected the $75,000 area and began consolidating between roughly $75,000 and $77,000.
Earlier selling followed the U.S. Senate’s failure to advance the CLARITY Act. The procedural vote ended 49–50, leaving the bill 11 votes short of the 60 required to begin debate. The proposal sought to divide digital asset oversight between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
Fed decision leaves Bitcoin below daily resistance
The daily chart shows that Bitcoin remains in a weaker position despite holding above $75,000. The price trades below the Bollinger Band midpoint at $78,028, which now acts as the first major technical barrier.

Bitcoin is also close to the lower Bollinger Band at $75,163. The recent test of this area attracted buyers, but another daily close below it could expose the market to a deeper correction. The upper band stands near $80,894, placing it close to the wider resistance area that capped rebounds earlier in September.
Daily relative strength index readings provide a mixed signal. The RSI stands at 50.77, close to the neutral 50 level, while its moving average remains higher at 57.62. Momentum has cooled from overbought conditions reached after Bitcoin’s late-August rally, but the indicator has not yet fallen into oversold territory.
The setup suggests that Bitcoin is consolidating rather than confirming a sustained recovery. A move above the Bollinger midpoint would improve the short-term structure, while a break under $75,000 would give sellers control again.
4-hour momentum points to a possible rebound
Bitcoin’s 4-hour chart shows early signs that selling pressure is easing. The MACD histogram has moved slightly positive at 23.88, while the MACD line stands at minus 353.28 and the signal line at minus 377.16.

The crossover shows that short-term momentum is beginning to improve, although both lines remain below zero. Bitcoin would need continued buying to turn the signal into a broader bullish reversal.
The 4-hour Supertrend remains bearish at $78,596.72. Price also sits just below a nearby technical level around $76,648, making the $76,650–$77,000 zone the first barrier for buyers.
A close above that range could allow Bitcoin to test $77,300, followed by the Supertrend near $78,600. Failure to clear $77,000 would keep the price vulnerable to another test of $75,000.
Liquidation levels place $77K in focus
The three-day CoinGlass liquidation heatmap shows a dense band of leveraged positions near $76,800–$77,000. Another larger concentration sits between approximately $77,500 and $78,000.

Liquidity becomes heavier around $80,000, with additional clusters extending toward $82,000. Traders often monitor such areas because forced position closures can accelerate a move once price enters a dense liquidation zone.
Crypto trader Daan Crypto Trades said Bitcoin had already removed most of the liquidity below the market when it swept the August lows. He identified $80,000 and $82,000 as the largest remaining clusters within the wider range.
“The big clusters that are left in this range sit at $80K & $82K,” he said.
Those targets remain distant while Bitcoin trades around $76,000. A recovery through $77,000 and $78,600 would be needed before the upper liquidity zones become immediate targets. On the downside, the heatmap shows another strong band close to $74,700–$75,000, making that region a possible target if the current rebound fails.
Analysts watch $77.3K as the next trigger
Crypto analyst Lennaert Snyder said Bitcoin’s ability to defend $75,000 during the Fed decision supported a possible long setup. He added that recent declines had attracted short positions, creating conditions for a squeeze if the market moves higher.
“I’m looking to scalp-long towards the 77.3K POC first, reclaiming that is the next bullish trigger that opens the door to my next targets up to the extremes at 78.5K,” Snyder said.
Snyder identified $74,500 as an alternative support area if Bitcoin makes another downward sweep. A loss of that region would weaken the rebound case and bring the short-term holder cost basis near $71,300 into focus.
The immediate structure therefore depends on whether buyers can reclaim $77,300. A move above that level would open a path toward $78,000–$78,600, while a 4-hour close above the Supertrend could support a broader recovery toward $80,000.
A rejection below $77,000 would keep $75,000 exposed. Losing that psychological level could trigger another liquidity sweep toward $74,500, with $71,300 becoming the larger downside level if selling accelerates.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Crypto World
Celsius sues BitMEX over trades Alex Mashinsky said never happened
On September 12, Celsius Network debtors sued crypto exchange BitMEX, which is set to close on September 23. Celsius’ debtors suddenly want over $100 million before BitMEX shuts its doors.
Specifically, the debtors allege wrongful liquidation and seizure by BitMEX of Celsius’ BTC around the March 12, 2020 COVID market crash.
One day after that liquidation, Celsius CEO Alex Mashinsky promised that Celsius wasn’t trading at all.
“Fortunately, Celsius is not a trader,” Mashinsky declared on March 13.
Commenting on the COVID crash that had occurred one day prior, he added, “We don’t trade. We don’t buy and sell coins. We don’t decide, oh, BTC’s going up or down.”
He also gushed about Celsius’ supposedly wonderful performance. “We started charging higher and higher rates, earning more money for the community,” Mashinsky claimed, in reference to Celsius’ non-trading, lending division.
“So, we did exceptionally well last night. Again, credit goes to the team for putting together an amazing performance.”
Read more: The many misrepresentations of Alex Mashinsky
Celsius’ BTC derivative trading on BitMEX
Mashinsky is currently in prison but wild tales about Celsius continue.
According to Celsius debtors this month, contrary to Mashinsky’s non-trading claim, Celsius definitely had a leveraged long position in XBTM20 that BitMEX liquidated on March 12, 2020 as part of a “fraudulent scheme to defraud its own customers.”
XBTM20 was a leveraged derivative linked to the price of BTC that Celsius traded on BitMEX.
Although the debtors didn’t specify the financial leverage that Celsius was using, BitMEX famously offered up to 100x price exposure on its BTC derivatives around that time.
The debtors allege BitMEX’s “fraudulent misconduct” and “wrongful liquidation” of Celsius’ XBTM20 position allowed BitMEX to seize Celsius’ BTC that collateralized its trading position.
In essence, debtors claim BitMEX rigged its own liquidation engine.
The loss, Celsius debtors claim, was BitMEX’s fault, not the leveraged trading activity that Mashinsky told his YouTube audience Celsius didn’t conduct in the first place.
On March 12, 2020, BitMEX processed over $700 million worth of liquidations. Over 90% were forced closures of long derivatives.
BitMEX has already announced as of July 23, 2026 that it will close, encouraging users to withdraw their funds prior to the end of business. It has already stopped accepting trades to open new positions as of August 26, and plans to end exchange services entirely on September 23 at 04:00 UTC.
Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news and investigations, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.
-
Fashion6 days agoWeekend Open Thread – Corporette.com
-
Tech4 days agoThe Latest Weird Thing to Play Doom Is the Mapped-Out Brain of a Fruit Fly
-
Business6 days ago10 Most-Streamed Songs On Spotify In 2026 So Far, Led By Ella Langley’s Dominant Run On The Charts This Year
-
Crypto World6 days agoXAG/USD: Silver’s Short-Term Rally Meets Its Moment of Truth
-
Crypto World7 days ago2 Chip Stocks Broke Out This Week. Neither Was Nvidia
-
Tech7 days agoBattery life is the only iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone Duo upgrade I care about. Apple didn’t disappoint
-
Crypto World7 days agoOKX launches 10x OpenAI, Anthropic X-Perps in Europe
-
Crypto World6 days agoDiesel Tops $6 a Gallon for the First Time as 28 States Set Records
-
Crypto World3 days agoKraken Lets xStocks Holders Earn Yield Through DeFi
-
Business7 days agoWestern Digital Slips 2.7% as AI Storage Rally Cools After Record Cash and Guidance
-
Crypto World3 days agoElon Musk Drops a Bombshell: Grok 5 Could Be the AGI Breakthrough
-
News Videos6 days agoFacing Financial Fears
-
Business4 days agoRivals Sam Altman and Elon Musk Rally Behind Dario Amodei’s Call for a Slowdown in AI Development
-
Crypto World7 days ago
Ethereum Price Analysis: Consolidation at $2.5K Tests Momentum as On-Chain Activity Surges
-
Crypto World5 days agoCan AI Build a Startup in 72 Hours? Elon Musk's Team Will Livestream the Test
-
Entertainment6 days agoNews Specials, Movies, Shows, More
-
NewsBeat3 days ago‘Sick conspiracy’: Trump says only guardrails AI needs is ‘a strong and smart (High IQ!) president’ in all-caps rant
-
Crypto World13 hours agoUS Charges Robinhood Engineers Over Crypto Listing Trades
-
Crypto World6 days agoBitcoin ETFs Pull $167M as 2026’s Best Inflow Run Slows
-
Crypto World7 days agoUS CPI forecast at 3.4% as tariff risks build

You must be logged in to post a comment Login