Connect with us

Sports

Updated All-Time AP Football Polls by Program and Year

Published

on


  By SuperWest Sports Staff


The Associated Press (AP) Football Poll has run continuously since 1936. Up to 1960, the poll ranked only 20 teams. From 1961 to 1967, it was reduced to just the Top 10.

The Poll returned to ranking the Top 20 teams in 1968, retaining that format through 1988. In 1989, it was expanded to the Top 25 and has not altered its count since.

Initially, AP did not conduct a preseason poll, adding it in 1950.

Advertisement

Through 1968, except for the 1965 poll, AP crowned its national football champion after the regular season, before the bowl games were played.

That changed in 1964, when the regular-season AP champ, Alabama, lost the Orange Bowl to Texas.

Consequently, the news organization made plans to hold its poll after the bowl season, beginning in 1967, to award its national title.

Below you will find tables for the top football programs in the West, including:

Advertisement
  • The years in which they have appeared in the AP Poll
  • The number of appearances for each season
  • The percentage of the season in which they were ranked
  • Their high and low rankings for each year
  • Their preseason and final rankings, if any

Following those lists is a table with the total number of polls each program has appeared in its history.

USC leads the way in that category, having missed just five of the 90 all-time polls (as of the 2025 Final Poll).

Air Force
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2023 3 19% NR 17 22 NR
2019 3 18% NR 22 25 22
2010 2 13% NR 23 25 NR
2002 3 17% NR 18 22 NR
1999 1 6% NR 24 24 NR
1998 8 50% NR 13 25 13
1997 6 33% NR 18 24 NR
1995 1 6% NR 21 21 NR
1991 1 6% NR 25 25 25
1989 4 24% NR 17 24 NR
1985 13 76% NR 4 19 8
1983 4 25% NR 13 18 13
1972 4 27% NR 16 19 NR
1971 2 13% NR 18 20 NR
1970 13 87% NR 7 20 16
1969 4 29% NR 19 20 NR
1959 5 38% 15 15 18 NR
1958 7 58% NR 6 14 6

*Air Force has been ranked in 18 out of 90 polls.


Arizona football Pac-12Arizona
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2025 2 12% NR 21 22 NR
2024 3 18% 21 20 21 NR
2023 6 38% NR 11 23 11
2017 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
2015 4 25% 22 16 22 NR
2014 11 65% NR 8 21 19
2012 3 19% NR 22 24 NR
2010 11 69% NR 9 24 NR
2009 4 25% NR 18 23 NR
2000 3 18% NR 21 24 NR
1999 4 24% 4 4 19 NR
1998 16 100% 24 4 24 4
1995 5 29% 19 17 25 NR
1994 17 100% 7 6 20 20
1993 17 100% 14 7 19 10
1992 8 47% NR 9 23 NR
1990 7 44% NR 16 25 NR
1989 9 53% 18 15 25 25
1986 13 87% NR 10 17 11
1983 8 50% 14 3 19 NR
1975 15 100% 16 11 18 18
1974 9 60% 17 9 19 NR
1973 2 13% NR 19 19 NR
1968 1 7% NR 19 19 NR

*Arizona has been ranked in 24 out of 90 polls.


Arizona State
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2025 5 29% 11 11 25 NR
2024 5 29% NR 7 21 7
2021 5 31% 25 18 25 NR
2019 5 29% NR 17 24 NR
2018 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
2015 1 6% 15 15 15 NR
2014 16 94% 19 7 20 12
2013 10 59% NR 11 25 20
2011 7 44% NR 18 25 NR
2008 3 18% 15 15 15 NR
2007 12 75% NR 6 23 16
2006 4 25% 24 22 25 NR
2005 6 38% 20 14 20 NR
2004 13 81% NR 15 23 19
2003 4 24% 22 16 22 NR
2002 3 17% NR 16 25 NR
1999 4 24% 25 22 25 NR
1998 2 13% 8 8 14 NR
1997 13 72% NR 12 25 14
1996 18 100% 20 2 20 4
1993 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
1991 2 13% NR 24 25 NR
1990 3 19% NR 21 25 NR
1987 7 44% 14 12 20 20
1986 13 87% NR 4 18 4
1984 2 13% 13 12 13 NR
1983 4 25% NR 13 20 NR
1982 16 100% 19 3 19 6
1981 13 87% 20 9 20 16
1980 1 6% NR 20 20 NR
1979 1 7% 18 18 18 NR
1978 2 13% NR 12 14 NR
1977 8 57% 17 12 20 18
1976 2 14% 3 3 18 NR
1975 13 87% NR 2 18 2
1974 10 67% 15 7 18 NR
1973 15 100% 14 8 14 9
1972 12 80% 12 10 19 13
1971 15 100% 14 8 16 8
1970 14 93% 19 6 20 6
1969 1 7% NR 18 18 NR
1968 5 36% 17 14 20 NR
1960 1 8% NR 18 18 NR
1957 3 25% NR 11 17 12

*Arizona State has been ranked in 44 out of 90 polls.


Boise State
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2025 1 6% 25 25 25 NR
2024 13 76% NR 8 25 8
2020 2 12% NR 21 25 NR
2019 16 94% NR 14 24 23
2018 8 50% 22 17 23 23
2017 3 19% NR 22 25 22
2016 9 56% NR 13 24 NR
2015 4 25% 23 20 25 NR
2014 4 24% NR 16 25 16
2013 1 6% 19 19 19 NR
2012 10 63% 24 18 25 18
2011 16 100% 5 4 10 8
2010 16 100% 3 2 10 9
2009 16 100% 14 4 14 4
2008 13 76% NR 9 19 11
2007 8 50% 24 17 24 NR
2006 13 81% NR 5 25 5
2005 1 6% 18 18 18 NR
2004 14 88% NR 10 23 12
2003 6 35% NR 16 24 16
2002 5 28% NR 15 23 15

*Boise State has been ranked in 21 out of 90 polls.


BYU
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2025 13 76% NR 8 25 11
2024 13 76% NR 7 22 13
2022 6 38% 25 12 25 NR
2021 13 81% NR 10 25 19
2020 16 94% NR 8 22 11
2018 2 13% NR 20 25 NR
2015 2 13% NR 19 22 NR
2014 4 24% NR 18 25 NR
2012 1 6% NR 25 25 NR
2009 15 94% 20 7 25 12
2008 17 100% 16 8 25 25
2007 4 25% NR 14 23 14
2006 6 38% NR 16 25 16
2001 14 82% NR 8 25 25
1999 9 53% NR 15 25 NR
1997 6 33% 19 19 24 NR
1996 16 89% NR 5 24 5
1994 10 59% NR 18 25 18
1993 7 41% 19 19 21 NR
1992 5 29% 24 24 25 NR
1991 4 25% 19 19 25 23
1990 16 100% 16 4 22 22
1989 13 76% 19 18 25 22
1988 1 6% NR 20 20 NR
1986 3 20% 18 11 18 NR
1985 17 100% 10 7 18 16
1984 15 94% NR 1 13 1
1983 11 69% NR 7 20 7
1981 12 80% 16 8 18 13
1980 9 56% NR 12 19 12
1979 11 73% NR 9 20 13
1977 12 86% NR 13 20 20
1974 2 13% NR 17 20 NR

*BYU has been ranked in 33 out of 90 polls.


California
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2019 2 12% NR 15 23 NR
2018 1 6% NR 24 24 NR
2015 4 25% NR 20 24 NR
2009 8 50% 12 6 24 NR
2008 3 18% NR 21 25 NR
2007 10 63% 12 2 24 NR
2006 16 100% 9 8 22 14
2005 11 69% 19 10 25 25
2004 16 100% 12 4 12 9
2002 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
1996 2 11% NR 19 21 NR
1993 6 35% NR 16 25 25
1992 4 24% 20 17 24 NR
1991 13 81% NR 6 24 8
1977 5 36% NR 14 20 NR
1976 1 7% 15 15 15 NR
1975 6 40% NR 11 18 14
1974 4 27% NR 18 20 NR
1968 7 50% NR 8 18 NR
1958 3 25% NR 16 19 16
1954 3 25% 12 12 18 NR
1953 2 18% 14 14 16 NR
1952 6 55% 8 3 11 NR
1951 11 100% 5 1 19 12
1950 10 100% 14 4 14 5
1949 9 100% NA 2 10 3
1948 9 100% NA 4 9 4
1947 10 100% NA 4 15 15
1944 1 11% NA 12 12 NR
1943 1 11% NA 20 20 NR
1938 8 100% NA 3 14 14
1937 7 100% NA 1 2 2

*Cal has been ranked in 32 out of 90 polls.


Colorado
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2024 8 47% NR 16 25 25
2023 3 19% NR 18 22 NR
2020 1 6% NR 21 21 NR
2018 2 13% NR 19 21 NR
2016 9 56% NR 9 23 17
2005 3 19% NR 22 25 NR
2003 2 12% NR 17 24 NR
2002 14 78% 7 7 23 20
2001 11 65% NR 3 25 9
2000 2 12% 24 23 24 NR
1999 2 12% 15 14 15 NR
1998 8 50% NR 14 24 NR
1997 8 44% 8 8 24 NR
1996 18 100% 5 5 12 8
1995 17 100% 13 4 14 5
1994 17 100% 8 2 8 3
1993 17 100% 11 7 23 16
1992 17 100% 12 7 16 13
1991 16 100% 13 12 25 20
1990 16 100% 5 1 20 1
1989 17 100% 14 1 14 4
1988 1 6% NR 19 19 NR
1978 4 27% NR 13 19 NR
1977 8 57% 12 3 15 NR
1976 7 50% NR 12 19 16
1975 11 73% NR 9 19 16
1973 7 47% 11 10 19 NR
1972 15 100% 2 2 16 16
1971 14 93% NR 3 13 3
1970 6 40% NR 8 19 NR
1969 2 14% NR 16 18 16
1967 8 67% 10 3 10 NR
1961 8 67% NR 6 10 7
1960 1 8% NR 18 18 NR
1958 3 25% NR 9 19 NR
1957 1 8% NR 18 18 NR
1956 4 33% NR 18 20 20
1955 2 17% NR 14 20 NR
1954 2 17% NR 11 17 NR
1937 4 57% NA 16 17 17

*Colorado has been ranked in 40 out of 90 polls.

Colorado State
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2014 3 18% NR 21 23 NR
2003 1 6% 23 23 23 NR
2002 11 61% NR 16 25 NR
2001 2 12% 24 24 24 NR
2000 3 18% NR 14 23 14
1999 2 12% NR 23 24 NR
1998 1 6% 15 15 15 NR
1997 8 44% NR 17 25 17
1994 12 71% NR 10 24 16

*Colorado State has been ranked in 9 out of 90 polls.


Fresno State
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2023 2 13% NR 24 25 NR
2022 1 6% NR 24 24 24
2021 3 19% NR 18 25 NR
2018 5 31% NR 16 25 18
2017 1 6% NR 25 25 NR
2013 12 71% NR 15 25 NR
2008 5 29% NR 21 25 NR
2005 10 63% 24 16 24 NR
2004 4 25% NR 17 22 22
2001 11 65% NR 8 23 NR
1993 2 12% NR 25 25 NR
1992 1 6% NR 24 24 24
1991 1 6% NR 25 25 NR
1990 2 13% NR 24 24 NR
1989 3 18% NR 23 25 NR
1986 1 7% NR 19 19 NR
1942 1 13% NR 18 18 NR

*Fresno State has been ranked in 17 out of 90 polls.

Hawai’i
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2010 2 13% NR 24 25 NR
2007 16 100% 23 10 24 19
2006 2 13% NR 24 25 NR
1992 2 12% NR 20 24 20
1989 5 29% NR 23 25 NR
1981 1 7% NR 19 19 NR

*Hawai’i has been ranked in 6 out of 90 polls.

Nevada
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2010 10 63% NR 11 25 11
1948 6 67% N/A 10 19 NR

*Nevada has been ranked in 2 out of 90 polls.

New Mexico

No appearances.


Oregon Ducks Logo Pac-12Oregon
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2025 17 100% 7 2 8 4
2024 17 100% 3 1 9 3
2023 16 100% 15 5 15 6
2022 15 94% 11 6 25 15
2021 16 100% 11 3 22 22
2020 12 71% 9 9 25 NR
2019 17 100% 11 5 16 5
2018 9 56% 24 12 24 NR
2017 1 6% NR 24 24 NR
2016 3 19% 24 22 24 NR
2015 9 56% 7 7 23 19
2014 17 100% 3 2 12 2
2013 17 100% 3 2 12 9
2012 16 100% 5 1 6 2
2011 16 100% 3 3 13 4
2010 16 100% 11 1 11 3
2009 13 81% 16 7 16 11
2008 11 65% 21 10 24 10
2007 13 81% NR 2 23 23
2006 11 69% 21 11 25 NR
2005 12 75% NR 6 25 12
2004 2 13% 23 23 24 NR
2003 3 18% NR 10 22 NR
2002 13 72% 15 6 23 NR
2001 17 100% 7 2 11 2
2000 12 71% NR 5 20 7
1999 2 12% NR 19 25 19
1998 14 88% NR 11 24 NR
1996 1 6% NR 25 25 NR
1995 15 88% NR 10 24 18
1994 7 41% NR 11 21 11
1990 5 31% NR 19 25 NR
1989 2 12% NR 22 23 NR
1988 3 18% NR 18 20 NR
1987 1 6% NR 16 16 NR
1970 2 13% NR 16 19 NR
1964 2 18% NR 7 10 NR
1960 1 8% NR 19 19 NR
1959 5 38% NR 11 16 NR
1958 2 17% NR 14 15 NR
1957 5 42% NR 13 18 NR
1956 1 8% NR 18 18 NR
1954 2 17% 18 16 18 NR
1948 6 67% NA 9 16 9
1946 1 11% NA 19 19 NR
1941 1 13% NA 16 16 NR
1939 1 11% NA 11 11 NR

*Oregon has been ranked in 47 out of 90 polls.


Oregon State
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2023 15 94% 18 10 21 NR
2022 6 38% NR 16 25 17
2013 1 6% 25 25 25 NR
2012 12 75% NR 7 20 20
2010 4 25% 24 24 25 NR
2009 4 25% NR 13 20 NR
2008 6 35% NR 17 25 18
2007 1 6% NR 25 25 25
2006 2 13% NR 21 24 21
2003 2 12% NR 22 24 NR
2002 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
2001 5 29% 11 10 22 NR
2000 11 65% NR 4 23 4
1968 10 71% 6 6 20 15
1967 3 25% NR 7 8 7
1964 3 27% NR 8 8 8
1960 4 33% NR 10 18 NR
1958 1 8% 12 12 12 NR
1957 6 50% 13 7 19 NR
1956 6 50% NR 10 17 10
1955 1 8% NR 19 19 NR
1951 2 18% NR 15 18 NR
1941 5 63% NA 12 18 12
1940 2 25% NA 18 19 NR
1939 3 33% NA 11 19 NR

*Oregon State has been ranked in 25 out of 90 polls.


San Diego State
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2021 8 50% NR 19 25 25
2019 2 12% NR 24 25 NR
2017 4 25% NR 19 22 NR
2016 4 25% NR 19 25 25
1995 1 6% NR 25 25 NR
1992 2 12% NR 21 23 NR
1977 3 21% NR 16 16 16
1975 2 13% NR 13 18 NR
1974 1 7% NR 20 20 NR
1970 5 33% NR 14 17 NR

*San Diego State has been ranked in 10 out of 90 polls.

San Jose State
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2020 3 18% NR 19 25 24
2012 2 13% NR 21 24 21
1975 1 7% NR 20 20 NR
1939 2 22% N/A 18 19 NR

*San Jose State has been ranked in 4 out of 90 polls.


Stanford
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2019 2 12% 25 23 25 NR
2018 7 44% 13 7 24 NR
2017 12 75% 14 14 23 20
2016 9 56% 8 7 17 12
2015 14 88% 21 3 21 3
2014 8 47% 11 11 25 NR
2013 17 100% 4 4 13 11
2012 16 100% 21 7 25 7
2011 16 100% 7 3 8 7
2010 15 94% NR 4 25 4
2009 4 25% NR 14 25 NR
2001 11 65% NR 10 23 16
1999 2 12% NR 22 22 NR
1997 9 50% 18 16 25 NR
1995 4 24% NR 16 23 NR
1994 2 12% NR 24 25 NR
1993 5 29% 15 15 23 NR
1992 17 100% 17 8 21 9
1991 5 31% NR 17 22 22
1986 5 33% NR 16 20 NR
1981 2 13% 18 18 19 NR
1980 6 38% 15 11 20 NR
1979 1 7% 13 13 13 NR
1978 4 27% NR 17 20 17
1977 1 7% NR 15 15 15
1975 2 13% 20 18 20 NR
1974 2 13% NR 19 20 NR
1972 7 47% 20 13 20 NR
1971 15 100% 19 10 19 10
1970 15 100% 10 3 13 8
1969 13 93% 16 13 19 19
1968 2 14% NR 14 18 NR
1957 2 17% NR 16 17 NR
1956 4 33% 14 10 20 NR
1955 4 33% NR 16 20 16
1954 1 8% NR 17 17 NR
1953 7 64% NR 11 20 19
1952 2 18% 13 13 13 NR
1951 9 82% NR 3 19 7
1950 4 40% 7 6 8 NR
1949 3 33% NA 12 17 NR
1946 1 11% NA 17 17 NR
1942 2 25% NA 12 12 12
1941 5 63% NA 6 19 NR
1940 8 100% NA 2 10 2
1937 1 14% NA 13 13 NR

*Stanford has been ranked in 46 out of 90 polls.

UNLV
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2024 6 35% NR 19 25 23

*UNLV has been ranked in 1 out of 90 polls.


UCLA
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2023 6 38% NR 18 25 NR
2022 11 69% NR 9 21 21
2021 4 25% NR 13 24 NR
2017 1 6% NR 16 25 NR
2016 1 6% 16 16 16 NR
2015 11 69% 13 7 24 NR
2014 16 94% 7 7 25 10
2013 17 100% 21 9 22 16
2012 9 56% NR 15 25 NR
2008 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
2007 3 19% 14 11 14 NR
2005 13 81% NR 7 25 16
2002 3 17% NR 20 25 NR
2001 12 71% 17 4 20 NR
2000 7 41% NR 6 23 NR
1999 5 29% 16 14 21 NR
1998 16 100% 7 2 8 8
1997 14 78% NR 5 24 5
1995 7 41% 16 12 24 NR
1994 5 29% 14 13 18 NR
1993 11 65% NR 10 25 18
1992 7 41% 18 11 19 NR
1991 10 63% 24 19 25 19
1990 2 13% 19 19 19 NR
1989 6 35% 9 6 25 NR
1988 17 100% 5 1 9 6
1987 16 100% 3 3 13 9
1986 14 93% 4 4 19 14
1985 15 88% 20 7 20 7
1984 10 63% 5 4 19 9
1983 2 13% 20 17 20 17
1982 16 100% 20 5 20 5
1981 10 67% 13 6 19 NR
1980 13 81% NR 2 18 13
1979 2 13% NR 17 20 NR
1978 15 100% 12 8 18 14
1977 5 36% 11 11 20 NR
1976 14 100% 17 2 17 15
1975 13 87% 14 5 19 5
1974 4 27% 12 12 18 NR
1973 15 100% 10 8 18 12
1972 14 93% NR 6 15 15
1971 1 7% 15 15 15 NR
1970 10 67% 18 13 19 NR
1969 14 100% 17 6 17 13
1968 4 29% 16 8 16 NR
1967 11 92% 8 1 8 NR
1966 13 100% 4 2 8 5
1965 6 46% NR 4 8 4
1961 1 8% NR 9 9 NR
1960 8 67% NR 8 19 NR
1959 2 15% NR 17 20 NR
1957 2 17% NR 15 19 NR
1956 2 17% 17 17 19 NR
1955 12 100% 1 1 9 4
1954 12 100% 8 1 8 2
1953 11 100% 4 4 12 5
1952 11 100% 18 3 18 6
1951 3 27% NR 15 18 17
1950 4 40% NR 13 19 NR
1949 3 33% NA 13 20 NR
1947 6 60% NA 16 19 NR
1946 9 100% NA 4 5 4
1945 1 11% NA 12 12 NR
1942 7 88% NA 10 18 13
1939 7 78% NA 7 19 7

*UCLA has been ranked in 66 out of 90 polls.


usc logoUSC
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2025 11 65% NR 16 25 20
2024 6 35% 23 11 23 NR
2023 10 63% 6 5 24 NR
2022 16 100% 14 4 14 12
2021 2 13% 15 14 15 NR
2020 13 76% 17 13 25 21
2019 5 29% NR 21 25 NR
2018 3 19% 15 15 22 NR
2017 16 100% 4 4 21 12
2016 6 38% 20 3 20 3
2015 8 50% 8 6 24 NR
2014 11 65% 15 9 24 20
2013 5 29% 24 19 25 19
2012 12 75% 1 1 21 NR
2011 10 63% 25 5 25 6
2010 7 44% 14 14 24 NR
2009 15 94% 4 3 24 22
2008 17 100% 3 1 9 3
2007 16 100% 1 1 13 3
2006 16 100% 6 2 9 4
2005 16 100% 1 1 2 2
2004 16 100% 1 1 1 1
2003 17 100% 8 1 10 1
2002 18 100% 20 4 20 4
2000 7 41% 15 8 18 NR
1999 6 35% 19 16 22 NR
1998 5 31% NR 18 22 NR
1997 4 22% 22 22 23 NR
1996 7 39% 7 7 19 NR
1995 17 100% 7 5 18 12
1994 14 82% 17 13 25 13
1993 2 12% 18 18 22 NR
1992 12 71% NR 11 23 NR
1991 3 19% 16 16 22 NR
1990 16 100% 9 5 23 20
1989 17 100% 5 5 13 8
1988 17 100% 6 2 8 7
1987 5 31% 19 16 19 18
1986 9 60% NR 9 18 NR
1985 5 29% 6 3 18 NR
1984 11 69% NR 7 20 10
1983 4 25% 8 8 14 NR
1982 16 100% 10 10 19 15
1981 15 100% 5 1 14 14
1980 16 100% 4 2 17 11
1979 15 100% 1 1 4 2
1978 15 100% 9 2 9 2
1977 12 86% 4 1 20 13
1976 13 93% 8 2 19 2
1975 12 80% 5 3 17 17
1974 15 100% 5 2 18 2
1973 15 100% 1 1 9 8
1972 15 100% 8 1 8 1
1971 9 60% 5 5 20 20
1970 12 80% 3 3 18 15
1969 14 100% 5 3 7 3
1968 14 100% 2 1 4 4
1967 12 100% 7 1 7 1
1966 11 85% 9 5 10 NR
1965 11 85% 7 4 10 10
1964 2 18% NR 2 10 10
1963 4 31% 1 1 8 NR
1962 11 92% NR 1 9 1
1960 1 8% 6 6 6 NR
1959 12 92% NR 4 14 14
1957 1 8% 19 19 19 NR
1956 11 92% 15 6 20 18
1955 9 75% 13 9 16 13
1954 11 92% 17 7 17 17
1953 10 91% 8 7 20 NR
1952 11 100% 16 2 16 5
1951 8 73% NR 6 20 NR
1950 1 10% 12 12 12 NR
1949 6 67% NA 8 19 NR
1947 10 100% NA 3 20 8
1946 4 44% NA 10 16 NR
1945 5 56% NA 6 20 11
1944 7 78% NA 7 15 7
1943 6 67% NA 4 10 NR
1942 2 25% NA 14 16 NR
1940 2 25% NA 17 17 NR
1939 9 100% NA 1 8 3
1938 7 88% NA 7 19 7
1937 1 14% NA 11 11 NR
1936 4 57% NA 6 15 NR

*USC has been ranked in 85 out of 90 polls.


Utah
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2025 12 71% NR 13 25 14
2024 7 41% 12 10 18 NR
2023 12 75% 14 10 18 NR
2022 16 100% 7 7 20 10
2021 7 44% 24 10 24 12
2020 1 6% 22 22 22 NR
2019 17 100% 14 5 19 16
2018 6 38% NR 16 23 NR
2017 3 19% NR 20 23 NR
2016 11 69% NR 11 24 23
2015 14 88% NR 3 24 17
2014 10 59% NR 18 25 21
2010 14 88% NR 6 25 NR
2009 12 75% 19 16 24 18
2008 16 94% NR 2 22 2
2004 16 100% 20 4 20 4
2003 3 18% NR 21 25 21
1996 4 22% NR 20 24 NR
1994 11 65% NR 9 25 10
1947 1 10% NA 18 18 NR

*Utah has been ranked in 20 out of 90 polls.

Utah State
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
2021 1 6% NR 24 24 24
2018 5 31% NR 14 22 22
2012 4 25% NR 16 25 16
1961 1 8% NR 10 10 10
1960 2 17% NR 18 19 NR

*Utah State has been ranked in 5 out of 90 polls.


Washington football pac-12Washington
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2025 1 6% NR 24 24 NR
2023 16 100% 10 2 10 2
2022 9 56% NR 8 24 8
2021 1 6% 20 20 20 NR
2020 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
2019 7 41% 13 13 25 NR
2018 15 94% 6 6 20 13
2017 16 100% 8 5 16 16
2016 16 100% 14 4 14 4
2014 1 6% 25 25 25 NR
2013 8 47% NR 15 25 25
2012 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
2011 1 6% NR 22 22 NR
2009 1 6% NR 24 24 NR
2003 6 35% 17 17 22 NR
2002 9 50% 9 9 22 NR
2001 17 100% 15 8 21 19
2000 17 100% 13 3 15 3
1999 1 6% NR 23 23 NR
1998 5 31% 18 9 20 NR
1997 18 100% 4 2 21 18
1996 14 78% NR 12 25 16
1995 16 94% 24 15 24 NR
1994 13 76% 23 9 25 NR
1993 11 65% 12 12 25 NR
1992 17 100% 2 1 11 11
1991 16 100% 4 2 4 2
1990 16 100% 20 2 22 5
1989 4 24% NR 11 23 23
1988 7 41% NR 16 20 NR
1987 5 31% 13 10 18 NR
1986 15 100% 16 6 18 18
1985 2 12% 12 12 12 NR
1984 16 100% 18 1 19 2
1983 12 75% 18 9 20 NR
1982 16 100% 2 1 13 7
1981 11 73% 15 10 18 10
1980 10 63% 20 13 20 16
1979 15 100% 15 6 20 11
1978 5 33% 11 11 20 NR
1977 4 29% NR 10 19 10
1972 8 53% 9 9 18 NR
1971 10 67% NR 11 20 19
1970 1 7% NR 20 20 NR
1964 2 18% 7 7 10 NR
1963 1 8% 10 10 10 NR
1962 6 50% 10 7 10 NR
1960 12 100% 3 3 13 6
1959 8 62% NR 8 18 8
1955 4 33% NR 12 19 NR
1952 1 9% NR 17 17 NR
1951 3 27% 8 8 20 NR
1950 8 80% NR 10 19 11
1945 2 22% NA 18 18 NR
1943 7 78% NA 11 19 12
1941 1 13% NA 20 20 NR
1940 8 100% NA 10 17 10
1937 1 14% NA 13 13 NR
1936 7 100% NA 4 10 5

*Washington has been ranked in 59 out of 90 polls.


Washington State
Year App Pct Pre High Low Final
2024 4 24% NR 19 25 NR
2023 5 31% NR 13 23 NR
2019 4 24% 23 19 23 NR
2018 9 56% NR 7 25 10
2017 15 94% 24 8 25 NR
2016 4 25% NR 20 25 NR
2015 2 13% NR 20 24 NR
2006 1 6% NR 25 25 NR
2003 14 82% NR 6 24 9
2002 18 100% 11 3 17 10
2001 10 59% NR 9 19 10
1997 14 78% NR 8 19 9
1994 13 76% NR 16 24 21
1993 1 6% NR 25 25 NR
1992 9 53% NR 13 25 15
1989 7 41% NR 15 23 NR
1988 6 35% NR 16 20 16
1981 7 47% NR 14 20 NR
1977 1 7% NR 15 15 NR
1972 5 33% NR 19 20 19
1958 1 8% NR 10 10 NR
1957 1 8% NR 19 19 NR
1952 1 9% 15 15 15 NR
1951 7 64% NR 16 18 18
1942 5 63% NA 10 17 17
1941 1 13% NA 19 19 19
1940 1 13% NA 19 19 NR
1936 4 57% NA 14 20 NR

*Washington State has been ranked in 28 out of 90 polls.

Wyoming
Season App Pct Pre High Low Final
1998 1 6% NR 25 25 NR
1996 12 67% NR 16 25 22
1993 2 12% NR 23 24 NR
1990 5 31% NR 18 25 NR
1988 11 65% NR 10 18 NR
1969 5 36% NR 15 19 NR
1968 4 29% NR 19 20 NR
1967 7 58% NR 6 10 6
1966 1 8% NR 10 10 NR
1959 2 15% NR 16 16 16
1956 1 8% NR 19 19 NR
1950 5 50% NR 12 18 12

*Wyoming has been ranked in 12 out of 90 polls.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

Jake Paul announces MVP’s UK debut card featuring Dubois vs Harper and 3 other world title fights

Published

on

Whilst Jake Paul’s career as a boxer has stalled due to injuries sustained in his fight with Anthony Joshua, his promotional firm is marching on strongly, as Most Valuable Promotions have announced their U.K. debut with a quadruple header set for London this April.

Paul lost by knockout for the first time when he bravely accepted a challenge with ‘AJ’, who did what was expected of him in a sixth-round stoppage win, during which he broke the jaw of ‘The Problem Child’.

As a result, Paul is set to be sidelined for an extended period of time, with some fans suggesting it could be time for the YouTuber-turned-boxer to retire.

Advertisement

However, his position in boxing remains a strong one from outside of the ring, with Most Valuable Promotions sat as a solid player in the women’s version of the sport, home to a vast number of female world champions.

Paul’s outfit now look to flex their muscles with a show that broadcasts their dominance in the world of women’s boxing, as they stage four world title contests in London, headlined by a lightweight title unification involving British rivals Caroline Dubois (WBC champion) and Terri Harper (WBO champion).

Following the announcement, 25-year-old Dubois described the contest as a ‘legacy fight’, in an interview with Sky Sports.

“I’m excited to make this fight. This is a massive fight in my career and for British boxing, both a legacy fight and unification. The goal is to become undisputed world champion and this is the first step.”

The remainder of the world title bout quartet sees three further Britons compete in separate title contests, with unified super-bantamweight champion Ellie Scotney (WBC, WBO & IBF) set to challenge for the undisputed throne against WBA titlist Mayelli Flores.

Meanwhile, former undisputed super-lightweight champion Chantelle Cameron takes part in her first world title clash since losing the throne in a rematch with Katie Taylor. ‘Il Capo’ faces off with Czech Republic’s Michaela Kotaskova in a showdown for the vacant WBO super-welterweight strap.

Last but not least comes British champion Emma Dolan, who attempts to become a world champion in just her 9th professional fight, tasked with Mexico’s 44-year-old IBF super-flyweight ruler, Irma Garcia.

Advertisement

The event will take place at The Olympia in Kensington, London on Sunday, April 5, as the first fight of Sky Sports’ newly announced broadcast deal with Most Valuable Promotions. Paul, alongside co-founder Nakisa Bidarian, said:

“This event represents a major milestone for MVP as we bring our brand to the UK for the first time, and do so with Sky Sports, with a card that reflects the scale, depth and ambition of women’s boxing today.

“In our double main event, Caroline Dubois vs Terri Harper marks the long-anticipated unification between two of MVP’s elite British champions, while Ellie Scotney has the opportunity to make history and become the youngest undisputed champion the UK has ever seen.

“Alongside them, Chantelle Cameron fights to become a two-division champion and Emma Dolan gets her first world title shot.

“MVP is the global home of women’s boxing, and partnering with Sky Sports for the UK, to deliver this event will give these athletes the platform and market exposure they deserve, live from Olympia in London on Sunday April 5.”

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Maisie Hill: From career-threatening crash to snowboarding star

Published

on

Great Britain snowboarder Maisie Hill suffered life-threatening injuries after crashing into a wall of ice during a training session in 2023. Nearly three years on, she says she feels “blessed” as she prepares to be a part of Team GB competing at the 2026 Winter Olympics.

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

‘Getting better day by day’: Rishabh Pant offers positive update on comeback | Cricket News

Published

on

'Getting better day by day': Rishabh Pant offers positive update on comeback
FILE – India’s Rishabh Pant (AP Photo/Jon Super, file)

India wicketkeeper-batter Rishabh Pant on Tuesday offered a positive update on his recovery, saying his fitness is steadily improving and that he is optimistic about returning to competitive cricket soon. Pant was speaking on the sidelines of the World Pickleball League, where he attended as the co-owner of Mumbai Pickle Power. The 28-year-old revealed that he has been putting in extensive work at the BCCI Centre of Excellence in Bengaluru as part of his rehabilitation programme.

Are India favourites to win 2026 T20 World Cup? | Greenstone Lobo makes a HUGE PREDICTION

“My fitness is getting better day by day. I am working hard at the Centre of Excellence and I think I’m going to be out (on the field) soon,” Pant said. Pant underlined how important it has been for him to stay mentally connected to cricket during long spells away from the field. He credited his deep love for the game, along with the backing of those around him, for helping him navigate the challenges of recovery. “When I am injured, one thing that always keeps me close to the game is the love for the game and the support from the people around you,” he said. The left-hander also spoke about the need for constant evolution as a professional athlete, stressing that improvement does not stop even during injury breaks. “As a cricketer, you always have to keep adding to your game. I need to keep looking to get better in each and every aspect of my overall gameplay,” Pant said. Reflecting on the multiple comebacks he has made in his career, Pant noted that time away from cricket has given him a fresh perspective on both the sport and life beyond it. However, he admitted that being cut off from top-level competition remains the toughest part of an injury layoff. “Every comeback has taught me something about life. It has taught me more gratitude, how you see things around you, and wanting to be committed to something that really makes you happy. “When I am injured, the thing I miss the most is really enjoying the game. You love the game so much, but you also enjoy it while playing it at the top level. That’s something I miss truly,” he signed off. Pant has been sidelined since January 10 after suffering a right-sided internal oblique muscle tear during a practice session in Vadodara, when he was struck above the waist by a throwdown specialist.

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Raiders Pounce on Former Vikings Coach for HC

Published

on

Advertisement

Gary Kubiak and Klint Kubiak in the 2000s.
Gary Kubiak and Klint Kubiak in the 2000s.

After a few weeks of deliberation, the Las Vegas Raiders have presumptively hired their next head coach to replace Pete Carroll, and that man is ex-Minnesota Vikings offensive coordinator Klint Kubiak.

It’s a leap from coordinator work into the main chair in Las Vegas for Kubiak.

The Raiders conducted an extensive search in the last few weeks, landing on Kubiak, who will run the Seattle Seahawks’ offense this Sunday in the Super Bowl.

Advertisement

The Raiders Circle Klint Kubiak as Their Next Skipper

Another former Vikings coach hits paydirt.

Klint Kubiak on the field as Vikings offensive coordinator. Raiders hire Klint Kubiak head coach.
Klint Kubiak stands on the field in his role as Minnesota’s offensive coordinator during the 2021 season, surveying pregame activity as the Vikings prepare their offensive plan, offering a snapshot of his early playcalling responsibilities before later coordinator stops reshaped his league profile within a developing staff structure and evolving expectations. Mandatory Credit: Image Courtesy of PanthersWire

Kubiak to LV

Las Vegas’s agreement with Kubiak will be formally announced after the Super Bowl.

Until then, ESPN’s Ryan McFadden wrote, “The Las Vegas Raiders are expected to hire Seattle Seahawks offensive coordinator Klint Kubiak as their next head coach after the Super Bowl, sources told ESPN’s Adam Schefter on Sunday. A deal between Kubiak and the Raiders cannot be finalized until after the Super Bowl, in which the Seahawks will play the New England Patriots next Sunday.”

Advertisement

“After meeting Saturday with the Raiders and Arizona Cardinals, Kubiak intends to work out a deal with Las Vegas, sources told Schefter. Once a deal is reached, Kubiak — the son of former Denver Broncos coach Gary Kubiak — would become the franchise’s fifth full-term coach since 2021. With Kubiak off the board, the Cardinals hired Los Angeles Rams offensive coordinator Mike LaFleur as their new head coach, the team announced.”

Some thought Vikings defensive coordinator Brian Flores might gain some traction for the Raiders’ top job because of his connection to Tom Brady from the New England days, but Flores never secured an interview.

Career to Date

Kubiak has a few more days to stand in the brightest possible NFL spotlight. Coordinating a Super Bowl offense has a way of reopening doors, and the Raiders were watching. It’s the same path Kevin O’Connell rode into Minnesota in 2022.

Advertisement

The soon-to-be Raiders’ boss’s actual body of work lands closer to competent than commanding. Three stints calling plays have produced middle-tier results, and the offensive efficiency rankings reflect that reality without much interpretation: 17th (2021), 25th (2024), then 14th (2025) in EPA/Play. Decent offense — not stellar ones.

Seattle’s current run complicates the evaluation a bit. The defense has carried the weight, but the offense peaked at the right time. The NFC Championship performance mattered to the utmost. Sam Darnold throwing for 346 yards, three touchdowns, and zero interceptions is the snapshot that front offices remember.

Then there’s the name. Gary Kubiak’s legacy still travels well in hiring rooms, and that association builds credibility before a single question is asked. Add Super Bowl exposure to that, and the head coaching interest becomes a no-brainer.

Mendoza + Kubiak = Raiders’ Future

Advertisement

Las Vegas controls the top of the draft, and the league already assumes it points toward Indiana quarterback Fernando Mendoza. With most of the quarterback class staying put for another year, the board thinned out fast. Mendoza stands alone as the cleanest, most immediate option. The Raiders will draft Mendoza, and that’ll be that.

That’s where Kubiak enters the picture. When the Raiders officially hand him a head coaching opportunity, it likely comes with a ready-made quarterback. Mendoza’s profile checks every early-box: polish, processing, arm talent, and production. The Heisman and National Title are evidence.

Other names exist, but they carry longer timelines. Ty Simpson still projects as a developmental bet. LaNorris Sellers and Dante Moore left the conversation by returning to school. So, it’s Mendoza or bust for the Raiders.

Klint Kubiak on the sideline before a Saints game.
Klint Kubiak reacts along the sideline during pregame routines at Caesars Superdome on Sep 8, 2024, preparing New Orleans’ offense for Carolina while coordinating communication and tempo, a moment reflecting his expanding responsibilities as a playcaller ahead of kickoff in a high-profile divisional matchup under national attention and early-season scrutiny conditions. Mandatory Credit: Stephen Lew-Imagn Images

Kubiak won’t be starting totally from scratch. He’ll be inheriting a potential franchise quarterback on Day One.

Reactions from Raiders-Themed Media

Advertisement

The reviews of the Kubiak hire-to-be are pretty favorable.

Just Blog Baby‘s Levi Dombro wrote, “Look, the odds of Kubiak coming to Las Vegas seem incredibly high at this point, and if the Raiders did land their top candidate, it would be a morale boost and massive schematic advantage. Pairing Kubiak with Fernando Mendoza, Brock Bowers and Ashton Jeanty would be a dream scenario for Raider Nation. One that the fanbase has wanted for a long time. But until pen hits paper, fans know better than to call anything ‘official, even if they look wildly likely.”

Fernando Mendoza looks on during Indiana vs. Purdue game.
Indiana quarterback Fernando Mendoza watches from the field during the third quarter against Purdue at Ross-Ade Stadium on Nov 28, 2025, processing game flow as pressure mounted, capturing a poised moment for the Hoosiers signal-caller amid rivalry intensity and late-season evaluation as scouts monitored his command and decision-making traits closely. Mandatory Credit: Marc Lebryk-Imagn Images

SI.com‘s Ezekiel Trezevant pumped the brakes just a bit: “Only time will tell if Kubiak is the right pick. There is reason to believe in Kubiak, who has undoubtedly earned the opportunity. However, the Raiders’ head coaching position is unlike any coaching or coordinator position in the league.”

“The job will present things Kubiak was not expecting, just as it did for the previous three head coaches the Raiders have fired over the past three seasons. How Kubiak responds to the natural, unexpected twists and turns that come with the Raiders will decide his fate.”

Kubiak will turn 39 in two weeks.

Advertisement

avatar

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

DFB boss can’t understand criticism about German Olympic bid

Published

on

German Football Federation president Bernd Neuendorf can’t understand the criticism surrounding a German bid for the Olympic Games.

“I don’t really understand it. When you apply to host a major football tournament, it’s never an issue in Germany,” Neuendorf said at the SpoBis sports business conference.

Advertisement

When it comes to major football tournaments, such as the World Cup or the Euros, Neuendorf pointed out that there are no referendums.

Advertisement

“Only when it comes to the Olympics. And I don’t really understand that. I always find it inspiring to watch the Olympics, whether in Paris or elsewhere,” he said, adding that he would like to bring something like that to Germany.

The German Olympic Sports Confederation (DOSB) plans to decide in September which candidate it will put forward in Germany’s bid for the 2036, 2040, or 2044 Olympic Games.

Munich, Hamburg, Berlin, and the Rhine-Ruhr region, with Cologne as its core city, are aiming to become the German candidate.

Advertisement

Advertisement

The citizens of Munich have already voted in favour of the Olympics in a referendum. A vote will be also held in in the state of North Rhine-Westphalia and in Hamburg on April 19 and May 31 respectively.

Berlin, meanwhile, is not planning to host a referendum.

In recent years, German bids for the Olympics have repeatedly failed due to referendums. The last Olympic Games in Germany were held in Munich in 1972.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

76ers limit Warriors to 2 free throws in blowout win

Published

on

NBA: Philadelphia 76ers at Golden State WarriorsFeb 3, 2026; San Francisco, California, USA; Philadelphia 76ers forward Dominick Barlow (25) shoots over Golden State Warriors guard Brandin Podziemski (2) during the second period at Chase Center. Mandatory Credit: Justine Willard-Imagn Images

VJ Edgecombe scored a game-high 25 points, Andre Drummond produced a double-double while subbing for Joel Embiid and the Philadelphia 76ers ran away from the Golden State Warriors for a 113-94 victory in San Francisco on Tuesday.

Six other Philadelphia players scored in double figures in a balanced attack that allowed the 76ers to extend their winning streak to five games while completing a sweep of the Los Angeles Clippers and Warriors in a road back-to-back.

The Warriors were playing their seventh straight game without Jimmy Butler III (knee), and Stephen Curry sat out for the second time in four games because of a sore knee.

Embiid was given the night off after putting in 32 minutes and contributing 24 points to the Sixers’ 128-113 victory over the Clippers.

The 76ers led by just three at halftime before scoring the first nine points of the third quarter to pull away.

Advertisement

Kelly Oubre Jr. nailed a 3-pointer and Edgecombe hit a 10-footer during the surge that opened a 12-point lead before Gui Santos got Golden State on the scoreboard for the first time in the second half with a 3-pointer at the 7:32 mark.

The visitors’ shared approach kept the Warriors at arm’s length the rest of the way, as the 76ers used a 25-8 dominance on the offensive boards and a 16-1 advantage in free-throw points to overcome being outshot 47.4% to 45.2% overall and 39.6% to 34.2% on 3-point attempts.

Golden State were awarded just two free-throw attempts over the 48 minutes — by Buddy Hield. It was just the ninth time in NBA history (regular season and postseason) a team attempted two or fewer foul shots in a game.

Advertisement

Drummond had six of the 76ers’ offensive boards among 12 total to go with 12 points in 29 minutes. Dominick Barlow snatched six off the offensive glass — his night’s overall total — to complement 10 points.

Tyrese Maxey chipped in with 14 points for the visitors, going 7-for-7 at the foul line. Trendon Watford finished with 16 points, Oubre 15, Adem Bona 11 and Quentin Grimes 10.

Edgecombe, who shot 11-for-20, also had a game-high seven assists.

Santos and Pat Spencer shared Golden State team-high scoring honors with 13 points apiece in the club’s fifth loss in seven games.

Advertisement

Moses Moody added 12 points for the Warriors, while Al Horford, Quinten Post and De’Anthony Melton each had 10 apiece.

Melton also found time for six rebounds and a team-high six assists, while Draymond Green was Golden State’s leading rebounder with seven to complement six points.

–Field Level Media

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

NHL roundup: Jake Guentzel caps dramatic comeback for Lightning in OT

Published

on

NHL: Buffalo Sabres at Tampa Bay LightningFeb 3, 2026; Tampa, Florida, USA; Tampa Bay Lightning right wing Nikita Kucherov (86) is congratulated by left wing Brandon Hagel (38), defenseman Victor Hedman (77) and center Jake Guentzel (59) after he scored a goal against the Buffalo Sabres during the first period at Benchmark International Arena. Mandatory Credit: Kim Klement Neitzel-Imagn Images

Jake Guentzel scored a breakaway goal with 15 seconds left in overtime as the host Tampa Bay Lightning won their ninth straight home game, beating the Buffalo Sabres 4-3 on Tuesday night despite trailing with less than 30 seconds left in regulation.

Nikita Kucherov spun and fired a half-length-of-the-ice pass to Guentzel, who snared it and beat Buffalo goaltender Colten Ellis (31 saves) for his second straight game-winner. Kucherov increased his point streak to nine games (six goals, 17 assists) with a tally and three helpers.

Tampa Bay defenseman Darren Raddysh scored a goal in his fifth straight game — tying the contest with 26 seconds left in regulation — and also had an assist.

Guentzel logged two points, and teammate Oliver Bjorkstrand tallied on the man advantage. Goaltender Andrei Vasilevskiy stopped 23 shots as the Lightning improved to 18-1-1 in the past 20 games. The Sabres fell to 6-1-1 in the past eight after splitting their back-to-back Florida trip.

Maple Leafs 5, Oilers 2

Advertisement

Matias Maccelli scored twice as visiting Toronto upended Edmonton.

Matthew Knies added a goal and an assist and John Tavares and Bobby McMann also scored for the Maple Leafs, who have won three straight. Anthony Stolarz made 34 saves.

Jake Walman and Kasperi Kapanen responded for the Oilers, who have lost back-to-back games. Connor Ingram stopped 22 shots.

Blue Jackets 3, Devils 0

Advertisement

Elvis Merzlikins made 24 saves for his first shutout of the season and Mathieu Olivier scored two goals as Columbus scored three times in the third period to beat New Jersey in Newark, N.J.

The Blue Jackets extended their season-high winning streak to six games. Columbus is 10-1-0 in its past 11 games and has won five straight away games after completing a 3-0-0 road trip on Tuesday. Merzlikins earn his 12th career shutout while improving to 11-8-1 on the season.

Olivier’s two goals and Dante Fabbro’s go-ahead goal all came during a commanding third period for the Blue Jackets, who outshot the Devils 13-7 in the final frame. Jacob Markstrom stopped 23 of 25 shots in the game for New Jersey, which is 1-4-0 in its past five games.

Advertisement

Islanders 5, Penguins 4 (OT)

Bo Horvat scored a breakaway goal 52 seconds into overtime Tuesday night for New York, which overcame a trio of deficits to edge Pittsburgh in Elmont, N.Y.

Barzal, Matthew Schaefer and Ryan Pulock also scored for the Islanders, who snapped a two-game losing streak. Ilya Sorokin made 31 saves. Barzal notched two assists while Schaefer and Horvat had one apiece.

Anthony Mantha, Egor Chinakhov, Bryan Rust and Justin Brazeau scored for the Penguins, who have lost two straight following a six-game winning streak. Brazeau registered two points, and Stuart Skinner recorded 18 saves.

Advertisement

Flyers 4, Capitals 2

Jamie Drysdale scored a power-play goal with 5:23 remaining as host Philadelphia snapped a four-game losing streak by topping Washington.

Dan Vladar (26 saves) authored a terrific performance, while Owen Tippett, Carl Grundstrom and Rasmus Ristolainen also scored for the Flyers and Travis Konecny picked up two assists.

Anthony Beauvillier notched a goal and an assist for the Capitals, who came in on a three-game winning streak. Aliaksei Protas also scored for Washington, while Clay Stevenson turned aside 18 shots.

Advertisement

Hurricanes 4, Senators 3

Seth Jarvis scored two goals and Jordan Staal scored the tiebreaking goal with 5:07 remaining as Carolina hung on to beat Ottawa in Raleigh, N.C., the Hurricanes’ final home game before the Olympic break.

Brandon Bussi made 22 saves, including strong work down the stretch, to boost his record to 22-3-1 as a rookie. The Hurricanes, whose points streak increased to a season-best nine games (7-0-2), saw a two-goal lead vanish. However, they recovered on Staal’s 14th goal of the season when the Senators were slow to respond on a line change.

Stephen Halliday, Tim Stutzle and Jake Sanderson, who also had an assist, scored for the Senators, who fell short of notching their first five-game winning streak of the season. Dylan Cozens provided two assists. James Reimer, a former Carolina goalie (2019-21), made 14 saves in defeat.

Advertisement

–Field Level Media

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Tom Brady concedes GOAT title to another NFL legend

Published

on

While he is widely considered the greatest player in NFL history, Tom Brady has given that unofficial title to another gridiron great. A diehard 49ers fan during his childhood, Brady anointed former San Francisco receiver Jerry Rice as the greatest football player of all time. 

“Jerry sets the standard for every football player that’s ever played and will play in the future,” Brady said during the second episode of “Rise of the 49ers,” an AMC documentary about the 49ers’ dynasty. “He had a relentless drive to pursue his own excellence. 

“Jerry Rice is still the GOAT.” 

A fixture in the documentary, Brady conducted a sit-down interview Rice during the episode. Like Brady, Rice said that the secret to his success was in the dirt. His peerless work ethic led to him becoming unquestionably the best receiver of his era, but any era. 

Advertisement

While their greatness can be debated, everyone can agree that Rice is to receivers what Brady is to quarterbacks. Both players at the top of their proverbial food chains. 

Rice is the NFL’s all-time career leader in receptions (1,549) and receiving yards. His 22,895 receiving yards are 5,403 more than Larry Fitzgerald, who is second all time behind Rice in both categories. Rice’s 197 career touchdown receptions are 41 more than the next closest receiver, Randy Moss. 

Speaking of Moss, Brady helped him break one of Rice’s most iconic records in 2007, when Moss broke Rice’s single-season touchdown receptions mark. Moss caught 23 that season, one more than Rice caught during the strike-shortened 1987 season. Rice caught 22 touchdowns in 12 games

Rice was at his best on the game’s biggest stage. He is the Super Bowl’s career leader in receiving yards (589) and touchdown catches (8). Rice’s 215 receiving yards in Super Bowl XXIII remains a single-game Super Bowl record. He caught seven passes for 148 yards and three touchdowns a year later in Super Bowl XXIV and pulled down 10 passes for 149 yards and three scores in the 49ers’ win over the Chargers in Super Bowl XXIX. He was truly a cut above the rest. 

Advertisement

In all, Rice won three Super Bowls with the 49ers before playing in a fourth Super Bowl with the Raiders. 

Rice was the third receiver to win Super Bowl MVP. 
Getty Images

Brady tops the charts in career passing yards (89,214) and has nearly 9,000 more yards than Drew Brees, the second most prolific passer in league history. His 649 career touchdown passes are 78 more than Brees, who retired as the career leader in both categories before Brady passed him. 

Super Bowls, however, may define Brady’s NFL career more than anything else. His seven Super Bowl wins are two more than any other franchise. He won a record five Super Bowl MVP awards and owns just about every Super Bowl career record and also owns the single-game record for passing yards (505). He also helped engineer the biggest comeback in Super Bowl history that was also the first Super Bowl to go to overtime. 

Brady’s fifth title cemented his legacy as the greatest QB of all-time. 
Getty Images

Another similarity between the two is how well they both played well into their 40s. 

Advertisement

Brady won two Super Bowls after turning 40 while becoming the second starting quarterback in NFL history to win a Super Bowl with multiple franchises. During his age-44 season, Brady led the NFL with 5,316 yards and 44 touchdown passes. 

At the age of 40, Rice earned his 13th Pro Bowl nod after catching 92 passes for 1,211 yards and seven touchdowns. He capped off that season with a 48-yard touchdown catch in the Super Bowl. 

While their careers did overlap, Brady and Rice never played together, which would have been similar to watching LeBron James and Michael Jordan join forces on the hardwood. And like LeBron/Jordan debate, any debate between Rice and Brady simply comes down to preference. 

For Brady, though, there is no debate to be had when it comes to the greatest football player of them all. 

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Ducks beat Kraken, jump them in standings in final game before break

Published

on

NHL: Seattle Kraken at Anaheim DucksFeb 3, 2026; Anaheim, California, USA; Anaheim Ducks left wing Cutter Gauthier (61) celebrates his goal scored against the Seattle Kraken with defenseman Jackson LaCombe (2) during the second period at Honda Center. Mandatory Credit: Gary A. Vasquez-Imagn Images

Cutter Gauthier scored his team-leading 25th goal of the season as the Anaheim Ducks defeated the visiting Seattle Kraken 4-2 Tuesday night.

Jacob Trouba, Alex Killorn and Ross Johnston also scored and Jackson LaCombe and Jansen Harkins added two assists apiece for the Ducks, who won their second in a row and for the ninth time in their past 11 games to move past Seattle and into third place in the Pacific Division entering the Olympic break. Goaltender Lukas Dostal made 26 saves.

The Kraken, who saw their four-game winning streak snapped, will have a chance to regain that spot in the standings as they have one game left, Wednesday night in Los Angeles, before their three-week hiatus.

Seattle’s Jordan Eberle scored on a tip-in of Jared McCann’s shot at 15:31 of the third to spoil Dostal’s bid for his first shutout of the season.

The Kraken’s Shane Wright tallied at 17:29 after Dostal’s attempt at an empty-net goal was knocked down.

Advertisement

Seattle goalie Philipp Grubauer stopped 27 of 31 shots.

Tuesday’s game completed the regular-season series between the division rivals, with the teams splitting the four matchups.

The Ducks outshot Seattle 11-7 in a scoreless first period.

Advertisement

Anaheim opened the scoring at 4:01 of the second on a one-timer from the top of the right faceoff circle by Gauthier past a screened Grubauer just after a Kraken penalty had expired.

The Ducks made it 2-0 on defenseman Trouba’s goal at 19:27 of the period. Harkins carried the puck down the right wing before dropping a pass back to Trouba for a slap shot from the point that made it through a maze of players in front of the net.

Anaheim extended its lead to 3-0 as Killorn tallied just 24 seconds into the third on a wrist shot from low on the right wing through a screen.

Johnston made it 4-0 at 13:54 after Grubauer mishandled the puck behind his own net.

Advertisement

–Field Level Media

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

French footballer Kanté to join Turkish club after Erdogan intervenes to push transfer

Published

on


F‍rench footballer N’Golo Kanté has ​joined the Turkish side Fenerbahce after Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan intervened to push through a transfer deal with Saudi club Al-Ittihad. 

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025