Connect with us

Sports

The Vikings Have $19.5 Million Reasons to Do Something Controversial

Published

on

Advertisement

Vikings Place 2 Players on IR, Sign 2 New
Nov 13, 2022; Orchard Park, New York, USA; Minnesota Vikings tackle Brian O’Neill (75) congratulates Minnesota Vikings wide receiver Justin Jefferson (18) for scoring a touchdown against the Buffalo Bills during the first half at Highmark Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Gregory Fisher-USA TODAY Sports.

To begin, an obvious statement: cutting RT1 Brian O’Neill would be an unexpected decision. Foolish, even. What can’t be completely dismissed, though, is the possibility even if there’s greater than a 99% chance he sticks around.

The Vikings have been making a variety of moves to get the finances in order. Most notably, there have been the decisions to move out DT Javon Hargrave (who doesn’t appear pleased), DT Jonathan Allen, and RB Aaron Jones. All good players who were moving toward beefy cap charges within a snug Minnesota budget. Even more fascinating is that EDGE1 Jonathan Greenard is said to be on the trade market, revealing that Minnesota’s front office isn’t scared of being bold.

The Vikings Have the Capacity to Cut Brian O’Neill for Huge Savings

Best case is an extension for Mr. O’Neill.

Advertisement

The 2nd-Round selection from 2018 is a fantastic athlete. He got scooped up with the aim of bringing him along slowly, but he quickly proved capable of playing. Since his rookie season, O’Neill has been a mainstay on Minnesota’s offensive line. Portions of those Mike Zimmer years had O’Neill and not a ton else among the large lads protecting the passer.

Jan 4, 2026; Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Minnesota Vikings guard Will Fries (76), offensive tackle Brian O’Neill (75) and fullback C.J. Ham (30) celebrate after a touchdown against the Green Bay Packers during the second quarter at U.S. Bank Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Matt Blewett-Imagn Images

If anyone in Minnesota has earned a chance to lift the Lombardi, it’s Brian O’Neill.

The starting right tackle is moving into the final year of his contract. Left untouched, O’Neill’s cap charge is going to hit the books at $23,115,657. O’Neill, without question, is worth the number. He’s quietly among the NFL’s foremost blockers. A problem does arise, though, upon considering the broader context of Minnesota’s cap.

Consider how much can be saved with the expected cuts. Rough estimates are used for simplicity:

Advertisement
  • Javon Hargrave: $11 Million
  • Aaron Jones: $7.75 Million
  • Jonathan Allen: $6.5 Million

Combined, the Vikings are liberating above $25 million with these cuts. Good progress, to be sure, but not enough to handle the entire $46,675,553 deficit that’s showing up on OTC. A simple cut involving O’Neill would mean tossing an added $19,411,765 into the mix.

Are the Vikings tempted at all? Best guess: no, not at all. Much better would be to arrive at an extension.

Dec 16, 2024; Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Minnesota Vikings offensive tackle Brian O’Neill (75) celebrates running back Cam Akers (27) touchdown against the Chicago Bears in the fourth quarter at U.S. Bank Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Brad Rempel-Imagn Images.

Opting to adjust the Brian O’Neill contract by adding more years comes with a pair of benefits.

First, an extension allows Minnesota to continue employing the rugged, athletic lineman. He’s aging well, allowing him to continue playing strong football even as he climbs into his 30s.

Second, there’s the possibility of freeing more cap space. An extension has the potential to see $14,160,000 added back into the mix. Not as good as a cut, but that’s a nice financial windfall.

Pulling the extension lever rather than the cut lever appears obvious, but the Vikings have so far resisted doing so. Maybe conversations are happening behind the scenes.

Advertisement

Right or wrong, the Vikings aren’t punting on competing in 2026, so they’ll be hesitant about jettisoning high-end talent. That is, of course, unless there’s a clear plan to replace the departing talent. At OT, such a replacement plan doesn’t appear to be in place.

Sep 14, 2023; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Minnesota Vikings offensive tackle Brian O’Neill (75) blocks against the Philadelphia Eagles at Lincoln Financial Field. Mandatory Credit: Eric Hartline-USA TODAY Sports

Per PFF, Mr. O’Neill allowed 2 sacks last season. So, too, did he get dinged with allowing 1 quarterback hit and 21 pressures. He was guilty of committing 6 penalties, something he’ll look to clean up moving forward.

At 6’7″ and 310 pounds, Brian O’Neill looks as though he was built in a lab to be an NFL offensive tackle. The team captain should remain.


avatar

Senior Editor for Vikings Territory & PurplePTSD . Twitter & Bluesky: @VikingsGazette. Email: k.joudry[at]vikingsterritory[dot]com. Canadian. Jude 1:24-25.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

New Details Surface on Jonathan Greenard Trade Buzz

Published

on

Advertisement

Jonathan Greenard watches from the Vikings sideline during a game against the New York Giants at MetLife Stadium.
Minnesota Vikings linebacker Jonathan Greenard (58) watches from the sideline during the second half against the New York Giants at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford. The Week 1 matchup on Sep. 8, 2024, featured Greenard observing the defensive unit between series as Minnesota battled New York in a tightly contested season opener. Mandatory Credit: Vincent Carchietta-Imagn Images.

The Minnesota Vikings do not have a pressing urge to trade outside linebacker Jonathan Greenard, and he may stay put when it’s all said and done. That’s the word from ESPN’s Adam Schefter on Thursday after news broke that Greenard could be shipped elsewhere this offseason.

Greenard’s pressure rates stayed strong in 2025, and the Vikings now weigh extension cost against possible draft-pick value.

Greenard’s guaranteed money ran out in 2025, and, in theory, the Vikings could trade him for a handsome draft pick if they don’t have the cash in the budget for a long-term extension.

Advertisement

Greenard’s Market Value vs. Minnesota’s Cap Situation

More context on the new Greenard rumor mill.

Jonathan Greenard celebrates after recording a sack for the Vikings against the Chicago Bears at Soldier Field. Jonathan Greenard trade buzz.
Minnesota Vikings linebacker Jonathan Greenard (58) celebrates after recording a sack against the Chicago Bears during second-quarter action at Soldier Field. The NFC North matchup on Nov. 24, 2024, featured Greenard bursting through the protection and bringing down the quarterback as Minnesota’s defense applied pressure in Chicago. Mandatory Credit: Daniel Bartel-Imagn Images.

Schefter: Vikings Don’t Want to Trade Greenard but It May End That Way

Foremost, “half the league” is reportedly interested in Greenard, as NFL teams are always in the market for top-tier pass rushers, especially those that also defend against the run. That’s Greenard.

Schefter also said about the Greenard trade sweepstakes on The Pat McAfee Show Thursday, “I think that there’s a case where I don’t think the Vikings really want to deal him, but it’s one of those cases where, if there’s a team that offers enough to go get him, and I think it would be a Day Two pick, so a second or a third, I think Minnesota, because of the financial questions and issues there, is gonna have to consider.”

Advertisement

“My guess is, in the end, when these things usually happen, when you hear about a player that a team is open to trading, when there have been discussions, when that happens like usually a trade happens, so I would say it’s probably more likely than not, but Minnesota knows how good he is, and I can tell you, isn’t going to be thrilled about giving him up.”

The verdict: Minnesota doesn’t want to lose Greenard but might have to because of the financial crunch created by former general manager Kwesi Adofo-Mensah.

The Compensation

The translation of Schefter’s comments — a Day Two pick — means the Vikings want nothing less than a 2nd- or 3rd-Round pick for Greenard. The Chicago Bears just shipped 28-year-old wide receiver D.J. Moore and a 5th-Round pick to the Buffalo Bills for a 2nd-Rounder. Anything is possible in the current climate.

Advertisement

What Greenard won’t fetch? A 1st-Rounder. He’ll turn 29 this year, and an EDGE rusher who just logged 3 sacks in 12 games is not worth 1st-Round capital in the eyes of general managers.

However, in theory, Minnesota could send Greenard and its 18th overall pick to a team with a Top 10 draft pick, and boom, the Vikings could select a blue-chip player. That’s on the table.

Two months ago, Greenard was whispered as a theoretical trade piece in a deal for Joe Burrow, though that was just fan fiction. Perhaps if Burrow personally requested a trade in the coming days or weeks, the Vikings could send multiple 1st-Rounders and Greenard to Cincinnati for Burrow.

Overall, expect something in the ballpark of a 3rd-Rounder if Minnesota is forced to trade Greenard.

Advertisement

Greenard’s Body of Work in MIN

In 2025, Greenard earned a 74.2 Pro Football Focus grade, a respectable mark for an EDGE defender. Despite missing five games, he ranked 17th in quarterback hurries and 31st in total pressures, demonstrating his ability to consistently disrupt the pocket.

However, his sack production presented a different picture. Greenard recorded the aforementioned 3 sacks in 12 games, a pace of just four over a full season. This represented a significant drop-off for a starting EDGE rusher, particularly one coming off a Pro Bowl season. Vikings fans often noted Greenard’s near misses, observing that he often beat blockers and forced errant throws but struggled to finish plays.

Now, the Vikings’ front office faces a crucial question: was 2025 an outlier, or a sign of declining performance? If Greenard rebounds and returns to double-digit sack production, a contract extension would be warranted, as a pass rusher with his disruptive capabilities is a valuable asset to any defense.

Advertisement
Jonathan Greenard and Harrison Phillips celebrate after sacking Texans quarterback C.J. Stroud at U.S. Bank Stadium.
Minnesota Vikings defenders Jonathan Greenard and Harrison Phillips celebrate after sacking Houston Texans quarterback C.J. Stroud at U.S. Bank Stadium in Minneapolis. The play on Sep. 22, 2024, came during a late defensive surge as Minnesota’s front generated pressure and reset near the line of scrimmage following the stop. Mandatory Credit: Jeffrey Becker-Imagn Images.

Alternatively, if the front office believes the decreased sack numbers indicate a deeper issue, trading Greenard for a 2nd- or 3rd-Round pick becomes a viable option. This would allow Dallas Turner to step into a larger role, while the team could add a veteran rotational outside linebacker through free agency, potentially targeting players like Arden Key or Von Miller.

Championship-caliber teams typically prioritize accumulating pass rushers rather than shedding them, as pressure on opposing quarterbacks is absolutely essential for defensive success. The Vikings moving on from a proven disruptor would signal a strong belief in the existing talent on the roster: Turner and Andrew Van Ginkel.

Parallels to the Danielle Hunter Situation

About 5-6 years ago, Minnesota encountered this precise situation. Danielle Hunter had signed a sweet extension in 2018, and by 2020, the deal felt outdated. Hunter held out for money, and the Vikings eventually met him halfway by adding more guaranteed cash to his contract.

Justin Herbert runs the ball while Jonathan Greenard pursues during a Chargers and Vikings game at SoFi Stadium.
Los Angeles Chargers quarterback Justin Herbert (10) runs with the football as Minnesota Vikings linebacker Jonathan Greenard (58) closes in during first-half action at SoFi Stadium. The interconference matchup on Oct. 23, 2025, showed Herbert scrambling away from pressure while Greenard pursued from the defensive front. Mandatory Credit: Gary A. Vasquez-Imagn Images.

Greenard’s deal — $19 million per year — was fair in 2024. Now, the best players at Greenard’s position earn $46 million annually. The Vikings must decide if paying Greenard between $27 million and $30 million — his market value — is wise for roster construction when Turner is hungry to start.

And thanks to Schefter, it is known that they prefer not lose Greenard.

Advertisement

avatar

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

CAF to Decide Host for 2026 Women’s AFCON Within 48 Hours

Published

on

Confederation of African Football has said it will reveal the host country for the 2026 Women’s Africa Cup of Nations within the next 48 hours.

The announcement comes after weeks of uncertainty about where the tournament will take place. Morocco was earlier chosen to stage the competition, but reports have suggested the North African country may no longer be fully ready to organise the event.

CAF communications officer Luxolo September shared the update on social media on Wednesday. He explained that the football body has been holding several meetings over the issue.

  • The Confederation of African Football (CAF) has made a decisive move by revealing the kick-off date for the qualifiers of the 2025 African Cup of NationsThe Confederation of African Football (CAF) has made a decisive move by revealing the kick-off date for the qualifiers of the 2025 African Cup of Nations

Advertisement

He wrote that CAF would soon communicate its decision on the situation and added that the matter is receiving urgent attention from the organisation’s leadership.

For more than six weeks, doubts have surrounded the hosting plans for the tournament. Morocco was expected to organise the competition for the third straight time after previously staging the event.

However, fresh speculation started after the 2025 Africa Cup of Nations earlier this year. That competition ended with controversy, as some teams raised concerns about officiating decisions during matches involving the host nation.

Advertisement

Although CAF president Patrice Motsepe earlier stated that Morocco would host the 2026 tournament, the absence of a formal confirmation afterwards has increased uncertainty among football stakeholders.

Meanwhile, South Africa has openly said it is ready to step in if Morocco decides to withdraw from hosting duties. The country’s Sports Minister, Gayton McKenzie, recently criticised Morocco and accused the country of creating problems for CAF over the tournament.

The delay has also raised concerns among participating teams, including defending champions Nigeria Super Falcons, who are preparing to defend their title after beating Morocco in the last final.

With the planned kick-off in April drawing closer, CAF’s expected announcement is hoped to bring clarity for teams, organisers and broadcasters after weeks of speculation about the tournament’s host.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Netherlands Women vs Ireland Women Prediction and Betting Tips

Published

on

The Netherlands Women and Ireland Women will battle for three points in a 2027 FIFA Women’s World Cup qualifier on Saturday (March 7th). The game will be played at Stadion Galgenwaard.

The hosts are coming into the game on the back of a 2-2 draw away to Poland, also in the qualifiers. They went behind to Ewa Pajor’s 24th-minute strike but drew level through Veerie Buurman in the 44th minute. Jill Roord put the Netherlands ahead two minutes into the second half, but Paulina Tomasiak equalized with six minutes left in regulation time.

Ireland, meanwhile, let a lead slip with 19 minutes to go in a 2-1 defeat at home to France. They went into the break in the lead thanks to Katie McCabe’s 12th-minute strike. Melvine Malard equalized in the 71st minute before completing the comeback eight minutes later.

Advertisement

The loss left The Girls in Green at the foot of Group 2 after one game with zero points. The Netherlands are third.


Netherlands Women vs Ireland Women Head-to-Head and Key Numbers

  • The Netherlands are unbeaten in three head-to-head games, winning twice.
  • This will be their first meeting since April 2018, when the Netherlands claimed a 2-0 away win in a 2019 Women’s World Cup qualifier.
  • Ireland’s last six games have produced three goals or more, with each of the last four head-to-head games having witnessed goals at both ends.
  • The Netherlands have scored at least two goals in four of their last six games.
  • The Netherlands remained in 11th spot in the last FIFA Women’s World rankings. Ireland are 27th.
  • Ireland Women form guide: L-W-L-W-L Netherlands Women form guide: D-W-W-W-D

Netherlands Women vs Ireland Women Prediction

The Netherlands did not have the best start to their World Cup qualification charge. But they are the firm favorites to claim maximum points here and rekindle their quest to qualify for a fourth successive World Cup.

The Republic of Ireland, meanwhile, made their World Cup debut at the last tournament in 2023 and will be looking to make it consecutive Mundials. They have alternated between a loss and a victory across their last five games, and fans will hope this trend continues.

We are backing the home side to claim a comfortable victory with goals at both ends.

Prediction: Netherlands Women 3-1 Ireland Women

Advertisement

Netherlands Women vs Ireland Women Betting Tips

Tip 1 -The Netherlands Women to win

Tip 2 – Both teams to score

Tip 3 – Over 2.5 goals