Politics
Nigel Farage To Cosy Up To Trump At Maro-A-Lago Dinner
Nigel Farage is jetting off to Donald Trump’s Florida home to dine with the US president amid a wider rift between the UK government and the White House.
The Reform UK leader said he will spend to Trump about the government’s plan to hand the Chagos Islands over to Mauritius and lease back the UK-US military base for £101 billion over 99 years.
The bill to give up the archipelago is currently on pause in parliament after the president withdrew his support for the idea once again.
He urged Keir Starmer not to “give away Diego Garcia”, warning that doing so would be a “blight on our Great Ally”.
Trump U-turned on his support for the deal after the UK refused to let American forces use British military bases for pre-emptive US strikes on Iran.
Farage, a friend of Trump’s, has long opposed the Chagos deal.
He claimed last month that Starmer “risks alienating our most important ally by giving away the Chagos Islands, the worst deal in British history”.
While attending a ‘Save Chagos Boat Party’ on Thursday, Farage told GB News – the station where he is also a presenter – that he would be visiting Trump on Friday.
“We think this is the central plan for this government’s foreign policy and we are beating them back,” Farage said.
“President Trump has almost understood the deal, but I will be dining at Mar-a-Lago tomorrow night and we will reinforce the message.”
The UK has since granted the US permission to use its military bases for limited, defensive purposes in its ongoing conflict against Iran.
However, Starmer has warned the White House about the legality of the war and suggested Trump has no plan.
The president has subsequently hit out at the prime minister, saying he’s “not Winston Churchill” as the “special relationship” hits a rocky patch.
Farage has also called for Britain to join Trump’s war in Iran, even though only 29% of Brits back the US-Israeli strikes last weekend, according to YouGov.
Politics
Vladimir Cast: Where Have You Seen The Netflix Show’s Stars Before?
If you’re already missing Bridgerton and need something new to warm yourself on those cold nights, Netflix’ steamy new comedy-drama Vladimir could be just what you’re looking for.
Set in the world of academia, Vladimir follows a middle-aged English college professor who becomes infatuated with her young colleague, while her husband is battling sexual misconduct allegations within the faculty.
Based on Julia May Jones’ critically-acclaimed novel of the same name, the eight-part series packs a lot in, exploring everything from middle-aged desires and the impact of cancel culture to how opinions about sex can differ between generations.
There are definitely more than a few faces on the cast list that you’ll recognise in this steamy new drama.
Here is where you might have seen the cast of Vladimir before…
Rachel Weisz

Oscar-winning Hollywood royalty Rachel Weisz plays the fourth-wall-breaking narrator in Vladimir.
Rachel’s breakthrough moment came in 1999, when she landed what is still considered one of her most iconic roles, playing Evelyn alongside Brendan Fraser in The Mummy and its sequel.
She went on to star in numerous big films in the 2000s, including the war movie Enemy At The Gates, the Nick Hornby adaptation About A Boy, alongside Hugh Grant and the vampire drama Constantine with Keanu Reeves.
In 2005, she won an Academy Award for her performance as an activist in the thriller The Constant Gardener.
More recently, Rachel has had roles in some major blockbusters, including The Bourne Legacy and Black Widow, and in 2018, she was Oscar-nominated again for her performance as Sarah Churchill in The Favourite.
In 2011, Rachel married Daniel Craig, and the couple had a daughter together in 2018.
Leo Woodall

Leo Woodall, who plays the titular Vladimir, first gained recognition when he appeared in the second series of The White Lotus, in which he played Quentin’s “naughty nephew”.
From there, he went on to appear in two episodes of Richard Madden’s Amazon Prime action series Citadel, before starring as Dexter in the Netflix adaptation of One Day.
Last year, he took on a leading role in Apple TV+ thriller Prime Target, playing a mathematician who uncovers an international political plot.
He was also acclaimed for his role in the WWII drama Nuremberg alongside Russell Crowe and Rami Malek, with critics declaring the performance one of the year’s most underrated.
Vladimir is not Leo’s first on-screen tryst with an older love interest, either.
In 2025, he appeared in the fourth Bridget Jones movie, Mad About The Boy as Roxster, a younger love interest for the titular diarist.
Leo has a busy few years ahead of him, too, with upcoming projects including Tuner with Dustin Hoffman, sci-fi movie Nomad and Anthony Bourdain biopic Tony set to be released.
John Slattery

John Slattery is best known for his role as Roger Sterling in Mad Men, for which he was nominated for four Emmys and won two Screen Actors Guild Awards.
Outside of Mad Men, John has appeared in a range of TV shows, including playing Will’s brother Sam on Will & Grace, Amy’s estranged husband on Judging Amy and politician-with-a-secret Bill Kelley on Sex And The City. He also starred as Gabrielle’s second husband on Desperate Housewives.
Meanwhile, on the big screen, John played Julia Roberts’ character’s boyfriend in Mona Lisa Smile, had a role alongside Matt Damon in The Adjustment Bureau and played journalist Ben Bradlee Jr. in Oscar-winning drama, Spotlight.
In the MCU, John played Howard Stark, Tony Stark’s father, in flashback sequences.
More recently, John portrayed the real-life prison warden Burton C. Andrus in the film Nuremberg.
Jessica Henwick

British actor Jessica Henwick found fame in 2015 playing Nymeria Sand in Game Of Thrones. That same year, Jessica portrayed Resistance pilot Jessika “Testor” Pava in the Star Wars reboot The Force Awakens.
Jessica’s other film work includes a leading role as Bugs in The Matrix Resurrections, Carmichael’s subordinate Suzanne in The Gray Man and Kate Hudson’s character’s assistant in the second Knives Out film Glass Onion.
On TV, she has played Coleen Wing in a number of Marvel TV shows and starred as Helen in Apple TV+ science fiction thriller, Silo.
You can next see her alongside Glen Powell in How To Make A Killing, as well as in the upcoming Taron Egerton comedy, Everybody Wants To Fuck Me.
Matt Walsh

Not to be confused with the controversial political commentator of the same name, Matt Walsh has a prolific career making audiences laugh on the big and small screen.
Matt is best known for his role as Mike McLintock in Veep, but if you’re a sitcom fan, you are sure to have seen him in one of his many comedy appearances, which include Brooklyn Nine-Nine, The Conners and Curb Your Enthusiasm.
On the big screen, he has had memorable supporting roles in comedies like Old School, Be Kind Rewind and Ted.
Ellen Robertson

Before getting her start in Hollywood, English writer-comedian Ellen Robertson was a popular name in British fringe comedy.
Ellen’s first role was in the 2020 BBC Agatha Christie adaptation The Pale Horse. She also appeared in one episode of comedies In My Skin, Pls Like and Stephen Merchant’s The Outlaws.
She also had small roles in the stand-out Black Mirror episode Joan Is Awful and Lena Dunham’s Netflix dramedy Too Much.
Her first feature film role came in 2025, when she starred alongside Robert Pattinson, Toni Collette and Mark Ruffalo in Mickey 17.
Miriam Silverman

Miriam is known for playing Bernice in The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel and Gretchen in Your Friends & Neighbours.
Vladimir isn’t the first time Miriam has worked with Rachel Weisz, as she appeared alongside the English star in Prime Video’s Dead Ringers.
You may have also recently seen Miriam in the American drama Landman in which she played Greta, the TCU admission officer.
On stage, she is a Tony winner thanks to her performance in the 2023 Broadway revival of The Sign In Sidney Brustein’s Window.
Kayli Carter

Kayli is already recognisable to regular Netflix viewers for her role as Sadie in the miniseries Godless. She also played the fictional housewife Pamela in the political miniseries Mrs. America, alongside Cate Blanchett, Rose Byrne and Elizabeth Banks.
On film, Kayli appeared in Bad Education, opposite Hugh Jackman and Allison Janney, as well as performing in Kevin Costner’s Western Let Him Go.
In 2019, she earned an Independent Spirit Award nomination for her role in Paul Giamatti’s comedy-drama Private Life.
Most recently, Kayli played real-life folk musician Maria Muldaur opposite Timothée Chalamet in the Bob Dylan biopic A Complete Unknown.
Elisa Moolecherry

Canadian actor Elisa Moolecherry has been consistently working in the industry for more than 20 years.
She is best known to some as Joey Jeremiah’s girlfriend, Sydney, in seasons three and four of Degrassi: The Next Generation, with her other credits including small roles in The Girlfriend Experience, Designated Survivor and Suits.
She recently appeared in Tiny Pretty Things as the journalist Zandara.
Tattiawna Jones

Tattiawna Jones has been a regular on our screens since her 2011 debut on Flashpoint.
Although she was well-known in Canada throughout the early 2010s, she became internationally recognised in 2017 with her role in series two of The Handmaid’s Tale. She played Lillie, a Handmaid originally assigned to Commander Glen, who later becomes involved in the Red Centre Bombing.
She also had a seven-episode arc in post-apocalyptic drama The 100, and was a lead in the 2019 Lost In Space remake.
Since then, Tattiawna has played Dr. Chaudhary in Station Eleven, starred as a corporate security agent in the Orphan Black off-shoot Echoes and had a leading role alongside Alexander Skarsgård in Apple TV+ science fiction comedy Murderbot.
Mallori Johnson

You may recognise Mallori for her role in the 2022 miniseries WeCrashed with Anne Hathaway and Jared Leto, and she also played the lead role of Dana James in sci-fi adaptation Kindred.
A star on the rise, you can next see Mallori in Is God Is, a big-screen thriller starring Janelle Monáe and Sterling K. Brown.
All episodes of Vladimir are streaming on Netflix now.
Politics
Bridgerton Season 4: 13 Biggest Differences Between The TV Show And Books
All on-screen adaptations of books make changes and take creative license with the original source material, and Bridgerton is no exception.
Over the last four seasons, the Netflix period drama has made a number of significant changes to Julia Quinn’s series of romance books when bringing them to life for the small screen.
When original showrunner Chris Van Dusen first took on the task of bringing Julia’s world to Netflix in 2020, he knew he’d have to make some changes and modernise the stories of regency romance.
“Even though the show is set in the 19th century, I still wanted modern audiences to be able to relate to it,” he told Oprah Mag in 2020.
As a result, the book makes numerous tweaks to the source material, switching key romances, making major changes to some characters and cutting others completely, helping to create the show the whole world has become obsessed with.
Here are 13 of the biggest differences between Julia Quinn’s books and the Netflix show…
Queen Charlotte, a real historical figure who was married to King George III, is not featured in the Bridgerton books

It’s hard to imagine Bridgerton without Golda Rosheuvel as Queen Charlotte, gossiping in court while sporting her fabulous headwear.
However, the real-life royal never actually appeared as a character in Julia Quinn’s book series. In fact, Queen Charlotte is only mentioned once in the novels, when she’s briefly spoken about in passing during the sixth book.
Original showrunner Chris admitted that he wanted to expand the world of Bridgerton through the monarch who was on the throne in 1813, when the first series takes place.
“What really struck me with the books from the beginning is that this was an opportunity to marry history and fantasy in a really exciting, interesting way,” he explained to Oprah magazine.
Julia Quinn loved this addition, even admitting she wished she had thought of it herself.
“I go back and forth between wishing I had actually written her in the books and then being glad I didn’t, because I don’t know if I could have done as good a job,” Julia added.
Julia would later write a prequel book about Queen Charlotte – which was itself adapted for Netflix in the show’s first spin-off – inspired by her addition to the Bridgerton universe.
“I had never done any type of writing where I had source material before and especially to have source material that’s in a very specific structure,” Julia told The Hollywood Reporter in 2023. “So what you really have to do is break down the architecture of a television script and then figure out how to put the pieces back together as a novel. To somebody like me who loves puzzles, it is really fun.”
The Bridgerton TV show puts a much greater emphasis on Lady Whistledown than the books

Much of season one revolved around the mystery surrounding gossip columnist Lady Whistledown, later revealed to be the alter-ego of Nicola Coughlan’s character, Penelope Featherington.
But the Whistledown saga is a much smaller plot point in the books.
Although the notorious columns appear in the novels at the beginning of some chapters, it’s not revealed who is actually behind them until the fourth novel.
In the books, Colin learns about Penelope’s alter ego before Eloise, and even before he proposes. Conversely, in the Netflix series, Eloise learns that her close friend, Penelope, is Lady Whistledown at the end of season two, which causes a rift between them.
Meanwhile, because Queen Charlotte is not a character, there isn’t an investigation into Lady Whistledown in the novels.
As for why they kept Colin in the dark for so long about his love interest’s hobby in the show, showrunner Jess Brownwell told Vanity Fair: “After Colin took so long to figure out his feelings for Penelope, we wanted to live in the love bubble between Colin and Pen a little bit longer before the Whistledown secret came out.”
She pointed out: “It also amps up the tension for him to find out when he does, because Pen has now held it from him much longer than she should have.”
Jess also didn’t want to keep viewers in the dark for as long as the book did readers, mainly because she realised people could just Google Whistledown’s identity, which had already been revealed in the books by the time the show came out.
Bridgerton’s controversial season one sex scene is much less consensual in the book

When executive producer Shonda Rhimes revealed she would be producing an adaptation of the Bridgerton books, readers wondered how the writers would deal with a controversial non-consensual sex scene.
In The Duke And I, Daphne (played in the show by Phoebe Dynevor) takes advantage of a drunken Simon (Regé-Jean Page) and coerces him into having sex without using the pull-out method.
The series still followed this plot, although they made it a little less controversial, with the couple having consensual sex, and Daphne switching position midway through so Simon physically as not able to pull out. Although the moment is much less creepy than in the 2000 book, it still earned a response from audiences who felt it was still “marred with dubious consent”.
Responding to the backlash former showrunner Chris Van Dusen told Esquire: “We are a show that allows our female characters to be complicated and to be far from perfect. They often have to make complicated choices.
“In the writers’ room, we discussed that scene at length. We felt that the female characters on this show – Daphne, especially should be allowed to do just that.”
Season one lead Regé-Jean Page also told Oprah mag that he was “very happy that we had a different scene in the TV show than in the book”.
The Bridgerton novels’ Sheffield sisters became the Sharma sisters in season two

One of the biggest changes between season two of Bridgerton and the books is the background of the Sharma sisters.
In the book The Viscount Who Loved Me, Simone Ashley’s Kate and Charithra Chandran’s Edwina are described as blonde, pale-skinned English women with the surname Sheffield. In the show, the pair come from India to try and find Edwina a husband.
Executive producer Shonda Rhimes explained to Town & Country that making the girls South Asian was a “very simple choice.”
“I wanted to feel like the world we were living in was as three-dimensional as possible, and I wanted to feel like the representation was as three-dimensional as possible, too,” she said.
“Finding some South Asian women with darker skin and making sure that they were represented on screen authentically and truthfully feels like something that we haven’t seen nearly enough of. I felt like it was time for us to make sure that we were seeing as much as possible.”
Anthony and Kate’s relationship also plays out a little differently in the Bridgerton books
Season two’s love triangle plot was invented purely for the Bridgerton series.
In the novels, Anthony never proposes to Edwina, nor does Edwina ever get jealous of her sister’s romance with the Bridgerton brother.
The TV show evolves Edwina into a much more complex character, which changes the entire tone of their story.

Benedict’s attitude towards Sophie in season four of Bridgerton is very different in the book An Offer From A Gentleman
The recent fourth season of Bridgerton is based on the novel An Offer From A Gentleman, and one of the key differences between the show and the book is Luke Thompson’s character’s attitude towards Sophie, played by newcomer Yerin Ha.
While the recent episodes show Benedict acting in a kind and accommodating way towards Sophie, readers of the books have branded him a “controlling and manipulative jerk”.
As someone on Goodreads noted after checking out the novel: “Where the hell is that artsy, coy, carefree, vulnerable, bisexual Benedict that we saw on the streaming series?”
Benedict is much nicer in the show, but he isn’t without his faults, one example being the divisive moment he asks Sophie to be his mistress.
In the novel, Benedict blackmails Sophie into becoming his mistress because he can’t marry someone of her lower social class.
Showrunner Jess knows that it would be unappealing to bring the character to life exactly as in the book.
“We wanted to make sure that we preserved the character’s thoughtfulness and the character’s sensitivity, which again is a big credit to Luke Thompson and what he brings to the character,” she claimed to Town & Country.

Bridgerton’s writers turned Sophie into a Korean character in season four to honour the actor Yerin Ha
In the book, Sophie Beckett is depicted as the illegitimate, blonde daughter of the Earl of Penwood.
In season four of the Netflix series, she becomes Sophia Baek, a descendant of the Earl, who is working as a maid. This change isn’t just a switch in surname, it makes space for Yerin Ha’s Korean identity.
“A name is the first bit of identity that you share with the world, and that’s why changing a name can be so powerful,” Yerin told Tudum last year.
“To make Sophie’s name fit someone who looks like me is really empowering. All credit to Jess Brownell, our showrunner.”
It’s not just Sophie who gets a name change in the recent series. Araminta Gunningworth becomes Aramint Gun while her daughters, Posy and Rosamund, get the surname of Li, unlike their book name, Reiling.

Michael Stirling has been gender-swapped in the Netflix series to create Bridgerton’s first queer lead romance
When Bridgerton introduced Michaela Stirling in season three, it marked one of the series’ biggest departures from Julia Quinn’s source material.
In the original book series, Francesca Bridgerton falls in love with Michael Stirling, a male friend of her late husband John. The show has transformed this character into a woman, named Michaela, played by Masali Baduza.
As a future season is set to put Francesca’s love life front and centre, this will mark the first time the show’s central romance has been between a same-sex couple.
“I’m really, really excited to tell this story and also give it the platform it deserves, like a leading storyline, not additional characters,” Hannah Dodd told Refinery 29 Australia.
Masali agreed: “I think everyone’s story deserves to be told, and in Bridgerton, a lot of the characters are growing into themselves and learning new things about themselves.
“I think that the show accepts that, I think it’s important for everyone else to accept that too, and hopefully that can be reflected back into society.”

Following Michaela’s arrival in season three, Julia defended the changes, acknowledging that while some people would be “disappointed”, she had actually worked with the Bridgerton team to agree to the decision.
“Anyone who has seen an interview with me from the past four years knows that I am deeply committed to the Bridgerton world becoming more diverse and inclusive as the stories move from book to screen,” Julia Quinn wrote in a statement.
Bridgerton season four didn’t include a storyline about Francesca’s miscarriage
Season four touches on a few storylines outlined in the book When He Was Wicked, in which Francesca Bridgerton is the main character.
In both the book and the TV show, Francesca thinks she is pregnant after her husband John tragically dies. While in the TV show, this is later discovered to be a false alarm, in the books, Francesca actually miscarries after her sudden loss.
Jess admitted in an interview from earlier this year that she felt incorporating the miscarriage plot felt too “morbid” for the TV series.
“Ultimately, I think John’s death and the funeral are already in so many ways such a departure from the tone of the show,” she told Swooon.
“I think episode seven has hints of lightness, but it is a much darker version of Bridgerton in a way that I think is really interesting, and especially in the way we get to watch the family come together.”

Penelope Featherington’s sister Felicity is completely omitted from the Bridgerton TV series
In the books, Penelope has a younger sister called Felicity, who has been totally excluded from the Bridgerton TV show.
This decision was made from the very beginning of the show by Shonda Rhimes, who felt that four Featherington sisters would be too hard to characterise.
Jess Brownell told TV Insider in 2024: “The main dramatic purpose of the Featherington sisters, they’ve obviously been comedic relief, but they’re there to play as a foil to Penelope.”
She added that the writers decided to completely cut Felicity as a way to push Penelope’s character forward more, and remove an unnecessary obstacle in her romance with Colin.
“I think dramatically it helped Pen [in the show] feel even more isolated and alone and underscored her plight to have her be in this viper’s nest with her sisters who are not very nice to her, and her mother who underestimates her,” she recalled. “So, we ended up really not needing that character.”
Benedict Bridgerton is straight in the novels, unlike his pansexual on-screen counterpart

In Julia Quinn’s book series, Benedict is explicitly straight, but on-screen, his sexuality is a little more complicated.
Season one includes hints that the Bridgerton brother is queer, which is confirmed in season three, when he engages in a tryst with Lady Tilley Arnold and her lover, Paul Suarez.
Talking to Glamour in 2024, Jess Brownell explained that she and the show’s other writers had planned Benedict’s sexuality reveal since season one in 2020.
“We just had never found the exact right way to execute it. I felt like it was this dangling thread that I wanted to make sense of, because I do think it makes sense for Benedict’s character,” Jess explained.
While the show has not put a label on his sexuality, Luke Thompson has said he believes Benedict is pansexual, because he’s “attracted to the way that someone thinks and feels, regardless of gender.”
“That’s a word that could be used. But what’s refreshing about it, certainly in the way that it’s being discovered at the moment, is that there is a sense of label-lessness about it,” Luke told Bustle in 2024.
Changing Benedict’s sexuality allowed the show to write a beautiful and important coming out scene between him and his wife-to-be Sophie in season four.
Marina Thompson is a totally different character in the TV show

A supporting character in the first season of Bridgerton, Marina Thompson doesn’t get a mention in the book series until the fifth instalment, To Sir Phillip, With Love.
In the source material, the character isn’t a Featherington cousin, either, and is actually a distant Bridgerton.
She is written as the first wife of Eloise’s love interest, Phillip, who tries to take her own life by walking into a river, eventually contracting a lung infection and dying days after she is saved.
Eloise bonds with Phillip when she sends a condolence letter to the widow, who never appears as a present character, as she died before the events of the novel.
In the TV show, Marina’s character is much more fleshed, with some fans noting that she feels like a totally different character. As a result, the plot in which she falls pregnant out of wedlock, and tries to trick Colin into marriage was a brand-new one for TV viewers.
“We’re really looking at the show as the evolution of a woman,” Chris Van Dusen told Oprah magazine about expanding Marina’s character. “Her story is a big part of that.
“We get to explore mindsets [that] become so normalised over time. Like sexism and misogyny, and the ways women have been treated for centuries.”
Cressida and Eloise’s friendship plays out very differently on-screen

One development that didn’t occur in the books was the season three alliance between Eloise and Jess Madsen’s character, Cressida. This friendship forms as a result of the rift that grows in Eloise and Penelope’s friendship, which doesn’t happen in the novels.
In the book Romancing Mr. Bridgerton, Cressida is a one-dimensional, malicious bully, but her character is fleshed out in the Netflix series.
Jess told Business Insider that Cressida’s friendship with Eloise opens her up and makes her less cruel.
“She’s changing, and they hold a beautiful mirror up to each other,” she said. “They’re not defensive, and they do hold a mirror up being like, ‘What you did wasn’t cool’.
“I love a mean-girl character, but even more, I love understanding why a mean girl is a mean girl. Because mean girls are not born, they’re made.”
All four seasons of Bridgerton are now streaming on Netflix.
Politics
What Is ‘Positive Discipline’? Tips For Parents, From Therapists
Parenting is a real rollercoaster – and one area plenty of parents (myself included) often find tricky is figuring out how on earth to successfully discipline kids.
After all, they will often push boundaries and buttons (especially the younger ones) and increasingly, we know that shouting and throwing our proverbial toys out of the pram isn’t going to help solve the problem.
Nor will taking their toys or privileges away in a knee-jerk, frustration-fuelled reaction.
People are increasingly rethinking how they parent, according to Pinterest’s latest parenting trends report – and interestingly, the platform has witnessed a 295% increase in searches for ‘positive discipline’.
What is positive discipline?
Per Unicef, positive discipline is “a method of teaching appropriate behaviour by interacting with children in a kind but firm manner”.
It’s about setting clear expectations, focusing on rewarding correct behaviour, correcting misbehaviour when it occurs, being respectful and non-violent, and providing logical consequences.
On the latter note, The Welsh government suggests parents should try to give positive consequences for their child’s positive behaviour more often than they give negative consequences for unwanted behaviours. An example of a positive consequence might be: “Well done for putting all your toys away, now we can read a book together.”
This can be helpful to prioritise as if we get into a habit of focusing on a child’s bad behaviour (which can be easily done), they might realise it’s a way to get your attention, and so the cycle continues.
Children who experience positive relationships are less likely to engage in challenging behaviour, according to Unicef, so it’s worth taking time to get this right.
With this in mind, I asked therapists and counsellors which positive discipline techniques work best for them in practice and, for those who have children, at home.

rudi_suardi via Getty Images
1. I stop and ask myself: ‘What am I feeling just now?’
Sarah Wheatley, a BACP accredited therapist at Birth and Beyond, who specialises in supporting mums, says she will often stop and ask herself: “What am I feeling just now?”
She might be feeling defensive, scared, or angry. “If I am coming from a place of fear, such as fear of embarrassment or judgement or ‘getting it wrong’ in some way, then I might be trying to get my kid to behave in a certain way to manage MY anxiety,” she says.
“It can really help asking myself that question, because then it allows me to really pay attention to what actually might be going on for my child and try to understand better.
“Often, that helps me figure out an intervention (or not) that is going to REALLY work for them and help them grow, rather than me imposing something to try to control their behaviour.”
2. I regulate myself first
Similarly, Debbie Keenan, a BACP senior accredited psychotherapist, ensures she is regulated before she even attempts to help regulate a child.
“I always draw from The Polyvagal Theory,” she explains, “this concept explains how one nervous system can calm another nervous system, how our automatic nervous system responds to safety and danger.”
She will stop and notice what is going on in her own body first if a child is dysregulated, asking herself: Is my heart rate faster? My breathing shallow?
“By consciously slowing my breathing, softening my voice, relaxing my posture, it sends signals of safety,” she explains. “A calm, grounded adult nervous system can enable a child to shift out of their fight, flight or freeze reaction into connection.”
3. I prioritise connection before correction
For L.J Jones, a BACP registered therapist and author of Become the Parent You Needed: Heal Yourself to Raise Emotionally Healthy Children, “the most powerful discipline shift” is connect before you correct.
“Co-regulation and emotional connection with our children before leaping into rigid corrective mode is the baseline for healthy parenting, whilst still teaching realistic boundaries,” said Jones.
“When a child is overwhelmed, their nervous system moves into fight-or-flight. In that state, they cannot access logic, reflection, or learning. Attempting to discipline in that moment often escalates behaviour rather than resolving it, and increases stress levels for everyone involved.”
On the subject of connection, experts recommend planning in one-on-one time with children – whether five or 20 minutes a day – to help improve relationships and also reduce misbehaviour.
4. I admit when I’m wrong and apologise
Nobody’s perfect and sometimes we get things wrong. For BACP registered psychotherapist Charlotte Fox Weber, it’s crucial that parents acknowledge when this happens – and focus on repair.
It’s noticing those moments when you really did overreact or when you projected your own bad day onto a small person who had nothing to do with it.
She says children don’t need parents who get everything right, they need parents who can get it wrong and stay in the room. Parents who can say: “I shouldn’t have spoken to you like that.”
“That moment teaches something a chart or calm-voice technique can’t replicate – that ruptures are survivable,” she explains. “That love isn’t a performance of perfection but a willingness to come back, recalibrate, and try again.”
And it’s also vital for building enduring attachments, she adds. “Being openly fallible in front of the people you’re raising isn’t a weakness. It’s one of the most hopeful things you can model. You become living proof – in real time, in the kitchen, on a Tuesday – that people can make mistakes, stay, and come back better.”
Politics
In defence of Brits in Dubai
It has been an unpleasant few days for Brits living in Dubai. Just as they were under fire from Iranian missiles targeting the United Arab Emirates, they found themselves under attack on the home front, too. Leading the rearguard action was one Ed Davey, leader of the Liberal Democrats.
Rising to his feet in the House of Commons on Monday, Davey launched a bizarre assault on British citizens living in the Gulf. Dismissing them as ‘tax exiles’ and ‘washed-up old footballers’, he implied that the UK government’s willingness to evacuate them from a warzone should depend on them ‘paying taxes’ in Britain – ‘just like the rest of us do’. Davey at least conceded that the Foreign Office has a duty to assist Britons abroad, but it was an unedifying spectacle nonetheless. Historic, global events were unfolding. Yet here was the leader of a major political party, using the occasion for moral grandstanding – not against Iran, or even against the American airstrikes they were responding to, but against his fellow citizens who happened to have been caught in the crossfire.
Davey’s complaints have since been echoed across the media. Speaking on Times Radio, columnist Giles Coren said that it had been ‘impossible to weep’ for those under attack in Dubai. ‘They are, when it comes down to it, influencers – the most hated people in Britain’, Coren intoned. Daily Mail columnist Sarah Vine was similarly nonchalant about their plight. ‘The chickens have come home to roost’, Vine wrote. She seemed to take an almost sadistic pleasure in the fact that ‘celebrities / influencers / OnlyFans porn actors’ seeking a ‘tax-free existence’ now wanted help from ‘the good old British taxpayer’.
The irony of Dubai-based tax exiles demanding state handouts may be amusing to the pundit class, but there’s not much evidence of this actually happening. As journalist Isabel Oakeshott – one of the ‘exiles’ targeted by Davey in his strange outburst – put it, there just aren’t that many expats begging to be flown home. There are, roughly, 250,000 Brits living in the United Arab Emirates. And yet, according to the UK government, about 100,000 Britons across the whole of the Middle East have registered for help – many of whom will have been in the Gulf states on holiday or on business, rather than permanent residents.
Instead of attacking Brits who live in Dubai, politicians like Davey would do well to ask why they might have left the UK in the first place. He would surely struggle to argue with their reasons.
A record 110,000 16- to 34 year-olds left the UK in the year to June, suggesting that life is not exactly a box of chocolates in their home country. Many of them have been saddled with university debts of more than £50,000 for a largely second-rate, online education. Rubbing salt into the wounds is the fact that the graduate job market has bottomed out, with job offers at their lowest point in 13 years. Meanwhile, industrial jobs that would once have sustained Britain’s working and lower-middle classes no longer exist – instead, they have been sent offshore, largely thanks to the green dogmatism of politicians like Davey. In 2022, the Lib Dem leader said he was ‘proud’ of his role in throttling British gas extraction, despite the damage this has done to the UK economy. Can he really be critical of those who have followed the money and opportunity that Britain once had?
Nor can moderately wealthy Brits be criticised for leaving the UK for Dubai. Keir Starmer’s Britain is not, even for them, the easiest place to be. Buying a home and raising a family is difficult these days for the middle classes, too. Meanwhile, despite an ever-increasing tax burden, there has been a noticeable deterioration in public services – especially in the NHS. Dubai, where there is no income tax and no welfare state, might not reflect Davey’s ideal society. But it can at least be said that you get what you pay for.
Of course, underlying the attacks on Britons in Dubai is a condescending class hostility. It is not simply the lack of taxes these Britons pay that annoys the media class – it is their perceived lack of taste. Dubai, essentially, is Essex on the Gulf. The cultural elites loathe the nouveau riche as much as they hate white-van man. ‘Schadenfreude’ – pleasure in another person’s misfortune – was the word Vine reached for to describe her feelings on seeing her countrymen and women being bombed. It’s a certain type of Brit who goes to Dubai (and she really seems to have been keeping extensive tabs on this) and so that’s why they supposedly had it coming.
The first repatriation flight touched down at London Stansted Airport from Oman in the early hours of Friday morning. Already, a reported 4,000 Brits have returned home from the Gulf via commercial flights. We should be happy they have returned home safely – whether they are the wheelchair-bound young woman, Amelia Reid, who was stranded in Dubai while holidaying with her boyfriend, or yes, even one of the ‘OnlyFans porn actors’ looming so large in Vine’s mind.
British citizens are British citizens, come what may. No matter how much tax they pay or whether you approve of their lifestyles. Now that some of them are home safe, perhaps the political class will launch a charm offensive to try to keep them here? Although after the past week’s wailing, that might be an uphill battle.
Hugo Timms is a staff writer at spiked.
Politics
Messi gets absolutely dragged for applauding Trump’s war boasting
Footballer Lionel Messi has gone from hero to zero in a moment after appearing on camera applauding US dictator Donald Trump’s boasting about his “Epstein class” illegal war on Iran and smiling as Trump praised himself for starving Cuba. A legacy destroyed in a moment.
As Tere Felipe commented:
Trump explains how the United States is doing a “great job” bombing Iran, and Lionel Messi and his teammates applaud him. There is no excuse for this when 1200 Iranians have died, including 300 children.
Trump explica cómo Estados Unidos está haciendo un “gran trabajo” bombardeando Irán, y Lionel Messi y sus compañeros lo aplauden. No hay excusa para esto cuando 1200 iraníes han muerto, incluidos 300 niños. pic.twitter.com/YNWzsaP4us
— Tere Felipe (@_TereFelipe_) March 6, 2026
And from the thousands of comments from previously adoring fans, the world agrees. Here are just a few examples:
For those who ain’t plugged into Argentina twitter (and the rest of the social media ecosystem)
They aren’t just dragging messi, argentines are fully cursing him to hell and rejecting any desire to win another World Cup with him as captain
I have never seen anything like it
— ✨dreamthem✨ (@gatx_negrx) March 6, 2026
His legacy died overnight. It was utterly grotesque of him to be clapping after the orange one boasts of violence and genocide and bombing little girls.
— 小仙女 🇨🇳🇷🇺🇰🇵🇵🇰 (@communist_bimb0) March 6, 2026
“Every arse-licker ends up eating shit”:
— Johny A Quiero Alam (@sapijoma2) March 6, 2026
“Messi and Suarez are some of the most despicable beings applauding evil US-Israel because it pays for their ostentatious and shallow lives”:
Messi y Suárez son unos seres despreciables que aplauden al Mal 🇮🇱🇺🇸 porque paga sus vidas ostentosas y superficiales. pic.twitter.com/Uvo1mwbzPx
— fernando villamil (@fernand85485612) March 6, 2026
Let me tell you something: I celebrated Messi lifting the WC even more than my own country winning. I cried bc my dad loved him since his WC debut but couldn’t be alive to see him give us the WC after more than 30 years. Now I hope they lost 1st round
— ⭐⭐⭐🇦🇷 (@deliveransse) March 6, 2026
— desesperharta⚰️ (@Lisag0thh) March 6, 2026
Messi applauds Trump
“Trump boasts that bombing Iran was justified. While Leo Messi, UNICEF ambassador, and his companions applaud”:
Trump se jacta de que bombardear Irán estaba justificado. Mientras tanto, Leo Messi, embajador de UNICEF, y sus compañeros aplauden.
Más de 165 niños murieron en una escuela en Irán tras un bombardeo estadounidense-israelí. pic.twitter.com/FNPPBahXKn— Hayat ة (@HayatHa33394572) March 6, 2026
“Ugh Messi, I thought you were a better person”:
Uy Messi creía que eras mejor persona 🤮 pic.twitter.com/pJnjB6NSgW
— Lucia🌹🇪🇦🇹🇷🇵🇸 (@lucy_arties) March 6, 2026
— Carlos CASTRO Marcos 🇮🇷 (@carlos53marcos) March 6, 2026
“Lionel Messi supporting the actions of the tyrant! Look at him, nothing more! The deaths of infants, the genocides are not trivial matters and no one with even a bit of brain should applaud or support the dictator who thinks he’s the master of the world! No one!”
@LeoMessiOffic apoyando las acciones del tirano! ¡Mírenlo nada más! Las muertes de infantes, los genocidios no son cualquier cosa y nadie con un poco de cerebro debe aplaudir o apoyar al dictador que se cree amo del mundo! ¡Nadie! pic.twitter.com/abw2Pbog8p
— César Qüeb (@cesarqueb_) March 6, 2026
“Fucking Messi, you spineless asshole, in front of the Orange Orangutan. I hoped that at the level he plays, he had the awareness to at least not applaud that monster rapist, murderer, genocidal thug, and convict for 34 crimes before a U.S. court.”:
Pinche #Messi arrastrado y pendejo, ante el Orangután Naranja. 🦧
Ojalá que al nivel que juega, tuviera la consciencia, para al menos no aplaudirle a ese monstruo violador, asesino, genocida y convicto por 34 delitos ante un juzgado de los EEUU.— Agustín C. S. 🇲🇽 🍉 (@Nitzug4uno) March 6, 2026
“Dictators need to have well-known references behind them to deceive the gullible masses.”:
Los dictadores necesitan tener referentes conocidos detrás, para engañar a las masas influenciables.#TrumpEpsteinFiles
— Maria Sepúlveda Catrillanca (@Maria_sepul66) March 6, 2026
“What a shitty decision right at this moment, this hurts Messi and favors the orange-faced, gassy, crazy imperialist… and on top of that, they didn’t want to go to the Casa Rosada when they won the World Cup ’cause they weren’t getting into politics, what an idiot 🤦 horrible everything”:
Q mala desicion justo en este momento esto lo perjudica a messi y lo favorece al cara naranja pedo chiflado imperialista …y encima no quisieron ir a la rosada cuando ganaron el mundial xq no se metían en política q pelotudo 🤦 horrible todo
— Karina Argomedo⭐️⭐️⭐️💙💛💙 (@karinaargomedo) March 6, 2026
— fleur (@fleurqts) March 6, 2026
He didn’t wanted to celebrate with our people on the Casa Rosada (our White House) because “politics” and now he’s applauding a genocide, hope we lose in the first round
— Romance (@capelettin1) March 6, 2026
I applaud every Argentinian who condemns Messi for taking a photo with a pedophile and warmonger.
Best regards from Raped Tero, Argentina.
— Gonzalin (@GoneZal) March 6, 2026
Many joined in to point out how Trump’s hands are dripping with innocent blood:
— Carlos CASTRO Marcos 🇮🇷 (@carlos53marcos) March 6, 2026
“Is this what they are applauding!?”:
Esto es lo que aplauden!?!?! pic.twitter.com/ehH4cGEqBN
— Daniel (@DanmurhMur) March 6, 2026
— Especialista Mcpal (@EspConstruccion) March 6, 2026
— vincentgambini (@vincentgambini) March 6, 2026
And many, many, pointed to late Argentinian superstar Diego Maradona who, no matter how messed up his personal life was, never forgot where he came from or betrayed humanity and ordinary people. Maradona opposed US imperialism and backed Iran against it. Many adding that they would boycott both this year’s World Cup in the US and anything to do with Messi:
#SiempreMaradona https://t.co/Dy4uv6OErT
— 🤘 #LeyDeIncendios #FinAlSecretoBancario (@davidpinto) March 6, 2026
“Even in death Maradona overshadows living Messi”:
La sombra de Maradona muerto va a aplastar la de Messi vivo.
Grande Diego!!! https://t.co/cyvWP9Oiih— Malaspina (@Malaspina550036) March 6, 2026
— desesperharta⚰️ (@Lisag0thh) March 6, 2026
The one and only. From Argentina! pic.twitter.com/1bLoX7Dmie
— Mar (@mar32_32) March 6, 2026
Deservedly so….he will never be him! pic.twitter.com/ryThqTHbqI
— Amin×Cine (@AmXInd) March 6, 2026
Messi will not ever surpass the glory of Diego Maradona at all levels. Maradona had magic in his stride as a footballer besides a genuine love for the downtrodden and social justice. Messi is just a hired gun devoid of anything redeeming that makes us human.
— Ana Escalante AIA (@EscArc) March 6, 2026
Gran diferencia pic.twitter.com/Pkf62w0RyS
— Rubén Tibu Fernández⭐⭐⭐ (@tibutres) March 6, 2026
Boycott the World Cup.
Featured image via Twitter
Politics
Trump’s war in Ecuador is about elite control, not about drugs
US president Donald Trump wants the world to think his regime cares about drug trafficking. But in reality, he’s just using the issue as a weak pretext to intensify his country’s regional stranglehold. And Ecuador’s repressive right-wing government seems all too happy to enable that.
Trump pushes for more ‘drug’ wars
Giving few details, the US revealed on 4 March that it had launched a joint military operation in Ecuador against “narco-terrorism“. International law sees drug trafficking as a crime rather than an act of war, with experts calling at least 150 US murders of unknown victims for unknown charges extrajudicial executions.
On 5 March, meanwhile, the US brought a number of Latin American and Caribbean nations to Miami for an ‘Americas against the Cartels’ conference. The left-leaning governments of Mexico, Brazil, and Colombia didn’t attend.
In January, the US used the term ‘narco-terrorist’ to try and justify its illegal abduction of Venezuela’s president, even though Venezuela is not a major player in the global drug trade. It has gone on to intensify its brutal blockade on Cuba, again using absurd arguments about links to drug trafficking.
Recent decades, however, have shown that increasing militarisation does not end drug trafficking. If anything, in fact, it makes it worse.
The failure of drug militarism in Latin America
In Colombia, for example, the US pushed ‘Plan Colombia‘ in 2000 as a way to deal with the drug trade. It funded destruction of crops, along with military and intelligence training. Experts broadly agree that it failed. It simply increased violence, deaths, displacement, human rights abuses, and illegal mining.
Perhaps one of the only things the US and its elite allies in Colombia could claim as a success was the weakening of left-wing rebels, which led them to sign a peace deal. It’s almost as if Plan Colombia wasn’t really about fighting the drug trade.
Mexico, meanwhile, had a similar story. In 2006, a right-wing government launched a military assault against drug cartels that made things much, much worse in the country. Since then, there have been hundreds of thousands of deaths and disappearances.
Just like Colombians, Mexicans faced mass displacement and increasing human rights abuses. And as big cartels split into many smaller ones, violence increased as criminals diversified into areas like extortion, illegal mining, migration trafficking, and fuel theft.
The first left–leaning Mexican president in decades sought to break away from this war on drugs from 2018 onwards. And while his successor has shifted strategies slightly, she’s still insisting on an independent path from the type of military escalation the US is pushing.
Ecuador’s right-wing president dances to Trump’s tune anyway
Ecuador had particularly low murder rates under a left–wing government in the early 2010s. But that changed amid a dramatic shift to the right at the end of the decade. And under the current right-wing president, it rose to having the highest homicide rate in South America. It’s now “a crucial zone for transnational organized crime“.
Ecuadorean president Daniel Noboa has pushed through ‘urgent’ neoliberal reforms, cutting public spending while clamping down on civil liberties, workers’ rights, and indigenous environmental activism against mining and fossil fuel extraction.
As part of Ecuador’s current military operations, it claims to have seized a “narco submarine” in a nature reserve. It said it found a camp too and came under attack. But it mentioned no arrests or drug seizures.
This coincides with the government ignoring a popular referendum opposing extractivism in one of the world’s most diverse natural areas and going after activists who campaigned for it.
Noboa isn’t just an elitist politician in the style of Trump. He’s also a willing lackey for the US leader. He has already expelled Cuban diplomats from Ecuador and suggested the US launch a “friendly takeover” of Cuba. And he has begun a tariff war with neighbouring Colombia.
The real solution?
It’s not just left-wing governments, activists, or experts who think waging war on the drug trade is not the way to go. It’s religious figures too. Because Ecuador’s most prominent Catholic figure, Luis Gerardo Cabrera Herrera, has spoken out against military escalation, saying:
The root of the violence is poverty, but not just material poverty. There is also cultural poverty – poverty of education, of healthcare, of opportunities… the state has failed to meet people’s needs for housing and work. When a person wants to work but cannot, when a child has no school or food, the perfect conditions for despair are created. And despair pushes people toward crime…
But repression does not solve the problem. The country does not need more bullets, more soldiers, prisons, or repression. The solution is not found there… The real solution lies in education, work, and human development… If we do not commit to that, violence will not disappear.
A key cause of poverty in Latin America, meanwhile, is decades of brutal imperialist intervention that have hindered just development.
The highly destructive drug trade, meanwhile, is also largely a result of demand from the US and other countries in the Global North. So the best way to really fix the drug problems in the US is to actually address health and economic inequalities that lead people there to use and abuse drugs.
But the US won’t do that. Because this military escalation isn’t really about drugs. It’s about the resources that the US wants and that other countries have. And it’s about making sure governments submit to what the US wants.
Featured image via PeoplesDispatch
Politics
World Cup qualifiers cast into doubt for Iraqi national football team
Doubts surround the Iraqi national team’s participation in the World Cup 2026 qualifiers, as flights remain suspended in some countries in the region following the US-Israeli war in Iran.
The Iraqi national team was preparing to face the winner of the Bolivia-Suriname match in Monterrey, Mexico, on 31 March, as part of the World Cup qualifying play-offs.
With the current developments in Iran, the Iraqi team is facing great difficulties in securing travel for its entire squad to Mexico to play the match.
Iraqi airspace has been closed since last Saturday, coinciding with the start of the war in Iran and the subsequent Iranian response of launching missiles and drones towards Israel and several countries in the region, causing widespread disruption to air traffic.
The Iraqi Football Association said in an official statement that FIFA and the Asian Football Confederation are fully aware of the developments surrounding the national team.
The statement added: ‘Due to the closure of airspace, our national team coach Graham Arnold is currently unable to leave the UAE, and a number of embassies remain closed, preventing some players and members of the technical and medical staff from completing the procedures for obtaining visas to enter Mexico.’
World Cup play-offs in doubt
These developments come after media reports in recent days about the possibility of moving the World Cup play-offs from Mexico to Qatar for security reasons. However, the ongoing war in Iran and the Middle East has cast a shadow over the sporting scene in the region and halted many activities, including in Qatar, less than 100 days before the start of the 2026 World Cup.
The teams involved in the qualifying play-offs are now awaiting a decision from FIFA on the fate of the matches, should the air and security crisis that is disrupting travel in the region continue.
In Iraq, the sporting community has high hopes for this opportunity to return to the World Cup finals via the international play-offs, after a long and difficult qualifying campaign.
The Iraqi public hopes that their national team will succeed in ending their years of absence from the World Cup, as Iraq’s last participation in the tournament was in 1986 in Mexico, when they appeared for the first and only time in their history in the finals.
In a related context,
the Iranian team’s participation in the 2026 World Cup also appears to be in doubt in light of the rapid military developments, especially since the next edition of the tournament will be held in the United States, Canada and Mexico, at a time when the United States is engaged in direct warfare with Iran, which may open the door to political and logistical complications that could affect the Iranian team’s participation in the tournament.
Featured image via Iraqi football
Politics
Israel takes its Dahiya Doctrine back where it began: Lebanon
Israel’s genocidal Dahiya Doctrine was forged in its defeat in Lebanon in 2006. Now the settler-state has gone full circle, imposing Dahiya on the same place it was created back in 2006 — Beirut’s southern suburb. The southern ‘Dahiya’ in Arabic.
This is how we got here:
Israel violated the US-brokered Lebanon 2024 ‘ceasefire’ over 15,400 times since it was signed. Must be a world record. Yet a short salvo from Hezbollah 2 March was framed as a signal outrage by legacy media. That attack has been cited by the settler-colonial state as a pretext to invade.
Not satisfied with pulling the US and her allies into a runaway war with Iran, Israeli troops have pushed into Lebanon with airstrikes pummelling the capital Beirut.
Some key background…
The Canary reported the early moments of the new war here. You can read about the secretive Israel-US ‘side letter’ pact which gave Israel carte blanche to keep bombing through the ‘ceasefire’ here. And our extensive coverage of Israel’s ceasefire regular breaches here.
Israel enforces mass displacement
The number of civilians who’ve fled the Israeli attack is staggering, as the World Health Organisation (WHO) has reported:
🔴 The World Health Organization says the war is driving large-scale displacement across the region.
➤ Around 100,000 people have left Iran since the fighting began.
➤ Up to 1 million people in southern Lebanon are being forced to move following yesterday’s evacuation orders,… pic.twitter.com/9GJtIYSOvP
— Drop Site (@DropSiteNews) March 5, 2026
The exodus is a result of Israel issuing a series of preposterous mass displacement orders:
🔴 Here is a copy of the map published by the Israeli army around 3 p.m., when they ordered the complete evacuation of Beirut’s southern suburbs in preparation for impending bombings.
The blurred outlines of the map posted by the Israeli army make it impossible to precisely… pic.twitter.com/TEXsZQicwd
— L’Orient Today (@lorienttoday) March 5, 2026
For Zionists with an apocalyptic vision of ‘Greater Israel’ the entire region is theirs. Their strategy to acquire it is the genocidal Dahiya Doctrine.
Dahiya’s scorched earth implications
Paul Rogers, emeritus professor of peace studies, explained Dahiya in the context of Gaza in December 2023. Surveying the early devastation in the enclave, he said the horror spoke to a:
specific Israeli way of war that has evolved since 1948, through to its current Dahiya doctrine, which is said to have originated in the 2006 war in Lebanon.
Rogers said:
In July of that year, facing salvoes of rockets fired from southern Lebanon by Hezbollah militias, the IDF fought an intense air and ground war.
However:
Neither succeeded, and the ground troops took heavy casualties; but the significance of the war lies in the nature of the air attacks. It was directed at centres of Hezbollah power in the Dahiya area, in the southern suburbs of Beirut, but also on the Lebanese economic infrastructure.
It was there in Dahiya that Israel’s genocidal impulses mutated into a new policy of annihilation.
Disproportionate force
Rogers explained:
This was the deliberate application of “disproportionate force”, such as the destruction of an entire village, if deemed to be the source of rocket fire.
One graphic description of the result was that “around a thousand Lebanese civilians were killed, a third of them children. Towns and villages were reduced to rubble; bridges, sewage treatment plants, port facilities and electric power plants were crippled or destroyed.”
In short, Israeli policy goes far beyond fighting ‘terrorists’ and aims to destroy the very means of life.
The policy came to fruition two years after the 2006 war via the Institute for National Security Studies at Tel Aviv University. The university published a report titled Disproportionate Force: Israel’s Concept of Response in Light of the Second Lebanon War:
Written by IDF reserve Col Gabi Siboni, it promoted the Dahiya doctrine as the way forward in response to paramilitary attacks. The head of the Israeli military forces in Lebanon during the war, and overseeing the doctrine, was General Gadi Eizenkot. He went on to be the IDF chief of general staff, retiring in 2019, but was brought back as an adviser to Netanyahu’s war cabinet in October.
Rogers wrote:
Siboni’s paper for the institute made it crystal clear that the Dahiya doctrine goes well beyond defeating an opponent in a brief conflict, and is about having a truly long-lasting impact.
Disproportionate force means just that, extending to the destruction of the economy and state infrastructure with many civilian casualties, with the intention of achieving a sustained deterrent impact.
That doctrine, born in Lebanon, was then pressure tested in Gaza over the course of several wars. And while a core Israel war aim in Gaza after 7 October was to destroy Hamas:
The longer-term aim is to make it utterly clear that Israel will not stand for any opposition. Its armed forces will maintain sufficient power to control any insurgency and, backed by its powerful nuclear capabilities, will not allow any regional state to pose a threat.
The Israeli military is back in Lebanon — if it can ever be so to have left — and as it pushes north it intends to impose this doctrine. Fine-tuned over two decades, the doctrine is with intentional civilian harm at its centre. And as a new regional war accelerates, the dogs of war are baying for blood.
Featured image via Aljazeera
Politics
US war propaganda goes into hyperdrive, but it’s so CRINGE
The emerging quagmire and resistance to the illegal US-Israeli war on Iran seem to have pushed the Donald Trump regime’s war propaganda into hyperdrive. But US citizens have seen this toxic story before. So cheap words and movie montages are unlikely to convince more people to back wasting billions on another forever war.
‘Embarrassing’ US war propaganda
The unprovoked US-Israeli offensive is already less popular than Vietnam. And just days in, there is open, widespread criticism of it in the US. This is hardly surprising, considering it has so far killed over 1,200 people in Iran and sparked regional chaos.
In this context, Trump’s White House has shared a vomit-worthy propaganda video. But far from helping, it has made his regime look even more like coked-up, roid-raging incels playing shoot-em-up games in their parents’ basements. And people were quick to point out its awfulness, with one calling it:
possibly the most embarrassing thing I’ve ever seen from any Government ever
lol interesting movie choices
Braveheart: The entire movie is about resisting imperial occupation by a more powerful nation. Using it to celebrate American military power is exactly backwards — we are the empire.
Saul Goodman: A corrupt, morally bankrupt lawyer who helps a…
— Adam Del (@adam__xyz) March 6, 2026
Wild that this is the reality: pic.twitter.com/z36Cylfi5n
— The Political Bitcoiner (@PoliticalBTC) March 6, 2026
The White House has also been putting out laughably fawning authoritarian phrases about “Unstoppable Momentum”, such as:
Under the decisive leadership of President Donald J. Trump, America’s unparalleled warfighters are delivering devastating strikes in Operation Epic Fury
And it seems to have taken tips from the propagandists of George Orwell’s 1984:
The only way. 🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/GQWt4LwsNH
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) March 5, 2026
The corporate media, meanwhile, has been playing along. It has:
Two nuclear powers — the US and Israel — are rampaging through Western Asia in violation of international law, disrupting energy supplies and destroying lives. And on top of that, Donald Trump’s regime is treating people in the US and around the world like idiots.
If the reaction online and offline is anything to go by, however, Trump’s war propaganda may be doing more harm to his reputation than good.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
Former President Barack Obama speaks during final public tribute to the late Rev. Jesse Jackson
CHICAGO — Former President Barack Obama said the presidential runs in the 1980s by the late Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr. set the stage for other Black leaders, including himself.
“The message he sent to a 22-year-old child of a single mother with a funny name, an outsider, was that maybe there wasn’t any place or any room where we didn’t belong,” Obama said Friday at a Chicago church as mourners paid a final public tribute for the civil rights legend.
“He paved the road for so many others to follow,” Obama said of Jackson.
Obama is joined by two other former Democratic presidents, Joe Biden and Bill Clinton, at a celebration of life for Jackson. Obama received the loudest round of applause as the three entered the chamber.
“We are living in a time when it can be hard to hope,” Obama said. “Each day we wake up to some new assault to our democratic institutions. Another setback to the idea of the rule of law, an offense to common decency. Every day you wake up to things you just didn’t think were possible.”
“Each day we are told by folks in high office to fear each other,” said Obama, referring to the current Republican leadership in Washington.
Former Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris is also listed as a speaker on the program, according to the Rainbow PUSH Coalition, the organization that Jackson founded.
President Donald Trump, who praised Jackson on social media after he died and also shared photos of the two of them together, was not attending the service, according to his public schedule issued by the White House.
Thousands attend Jackson memorial service
The event honors the protege of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and two-time presidential candidate and follows memorial services that drew large crowds in Chicago and South Carolina, where Jackson was born. Friday’s celebration — at an influential Black church with a 10,000-seat arena — is expected to be the largest.
Crowds of attendees waited in long lines outside the church on the city’s South Side as television screens played excerpts of some of Jackson’s most famous speeches. Inside, vendors sold pins with his 1984 presidential slogan and hoodies with his “I Am Somebody” mantra.
Along with a slew of Illinois elected leaders, notable attendees included actor and producer Tyler Perry, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, and political activist and theologian Cornel West. NBA Hall of Famer and Chicago native Isiah Thomas was one of the speakers.
Marketing professional Chelsia Bryan said Friday that she decided to attend the memorial service because it was “a chance to be part of something historic.”
“As a Black woman, knowing that someone pretty much gave their life, dedicated their life to make sure I can do the things that I can do now, he’s worth honoring,” Bryan said.
Jackson Jr.: Everyone welcome
Jesse Jackson Jr. said all were welcome to celebrate his father’s life.
“Democrat, Republican, liberal, conservative, right wing, left wing because his life is broad enough to cover the full spectrum of what it means to be an American,” Jackson Jr. said last month. “Dad would have wanted us to have a great meeting to discuss our differences, to find ways of moving forward and moving together.”
The elder Jackson died last month at age 84 after battling a rare neurological disorder that affected his mobility and ability to speak. Family members say he continued coming into the office until last year and communicated through hand signals. His final public appearances included the 2024 Democratic National Convention in Chicago.
Sitting in the crowd was 90-year-old Mary Lovett. She said Jackson’s advocacy inspired her many times, from when she moved from Mississippi to Chicago in the 1960s, taught elementary school and became a mom. She twice voted for Jackson during both of his presidential runs and appreciated how he always spoke up for underrepresented people. “He’s gone, but I hope his legacy lives,” she said. “I hope we can remember what he tried to teach us.”
Jackson’s service was to the poor, underrepresented
Jackson’s pursuits were countless, taking him to all corners of the globe: Advocating for the poor and underrepresented on issues including voting rights, health care, job opportunities and education. He scored diplomatic victories with world leaders, and through Rainbow PUSH Coalition, he channeled cries for Black pride and self-determination into corporate boardrooms, pressuring executives to make America a more open and equitable society.
His son, Yusef Jackson, who runs the Rainbow PUSH Coalition, recalled how his father carried a well-worn Bible but also showed his faith by showing up to picket lines.
“He lived a revolutionary Christian faith rooted in justice, nonviolence and the moral righteousness,” Yusef Jackson said Friday. “He was deeply involved in the political struggles of his time, but his gift was that he could rise above them. It’s not about the left wing or the right wing. It takes two wings to fly. For him, the goal was always the moral center.”
Jackson’s services in Chicago and South Carolina drew civic leaders, school groups and everyday people who said they were touched by Jackson’s work, from scholarship programs to advocating for inmates. Several states flew flags at half-staff in his honor.
Services in Washington, D.C., were tabled after a request to allow Jackson to lie in honor in the United States Capitol rotunda was denied by House Speaker Mike Johnson, who said the space is typically reserved for select officials, including former presidents. Details on a future event have not been made public.
-
Politics4 days agoAlan Cumming Brands Baftas Ceremony A ‘Triggering S**tshow’
-
Tech6 days agoUnihertz’s Titan 2 Elite Arrives Just as Physical Keyboards Refuse to Fade Away
-
Business16 hours ago
Form 8K Entergy Mississippi LLC For: 6 March
-
NewsBeat6 days agoAbusive parents will now be treated like sex offenders and placed on a ‘child cruelty register’ | News UK
-
Fashion12 hours agoWeekend Open Thread: Ann Taylor
-
NewsBeat7 days agoDubai flights cancelled as Brit told airspace closed ’10 minutes after boarding’
-
NewsBeat7 days agoThe empty pub on busy Cambridge road that has been boarded up for years
-
NewsBeat6 days ago‘Significant’ damage to boarded-up Horden house after fire
-
Tech2 days agoBitwarden adds support for passkey login on Windows 11
-
Entertainment5 days agoBaby Gear Guide: Strollers, Car Seats
-
Sports2 days ago499 runs and 34 sixes later, India beat England to enter T20 World Cup final | Cricket News
-
NewsBeat6 days agoEmirates confirms when flights will resume amid Dubai airport chaos
-
Politics6 days ago
FIFA hypocrisy after Israel murder over 400 Palestinian footballers
-
NewsBeat5 days agoIs it acceptable to comment on the appearance of strangers in public? Readers discuss
-
Tech6 days agoViral ad shows aged Musk, Altman, and Bezos using jobless humans to power AI
-
Video5 days agoHow to Build Finance Dashboards With AI in Minutes
-
Fashion6 days agoOn the Scene at the 57th Annual NAACP Image Awards: Teyana Taylor in Black Ashi Studio, Colman Domingo in Yellow Sergio Hudson, Chloe Bailey in Christian Siriano, and More!
-
Business3 days agoGuthrie Disappearance Enters Fifth Week as Family Visits Memorial
-
NewsBeat5 days agoUkraine-Russia war latest: Belgium releases video showing forces boarding Russian shadow fleet oil tanker
-
Crypto World6 days agoUS Judge Lets Binance Unregistered Token Class Action Proceed
