Connect with us

Business & Hussles

The 8 Best HR Software for Small Business in 2026

Published

on

hr software for small business

The first time I hired an employee, I made her fill out her W-4 by hand, emailed her offer letter from my personal Gmail, and tracked her PTO in a spreadsheet tab I labeled “vacation??” I found out three weeks later that I’d never actually set her up for direct deposit. She was very patient about it. I was not proud of myself.

That’s the thing nobody tells you about growing a small business: the moment you hire your first employee, you’ve also hired yourself as an HR department. Payroll, tax withholding, benefits, onboarding, time-off requests, compliance with labor laws you didn’t know existed, it’s all yours now, on top of everything else you were already doing.

So is dedicated HR software worth paying for, or is a well-organized spreadsheet good enough? I spent weeks digging through pricing pages, user reviews, and a fair amount of conflicting third-party pricing trackers to find out and to land on the tools that are actually worth a small business’s money in 2026.

The best HR software for small business, at a glance

  • Rippling — best all-around HR platform for teams that want room to grow, from roughly $8/employee/month plus a base fee (custom quote required)
  • Gusto — best for payroll-first small teams, from $49/month plus $6/employee/month
  • BambooHR — best dedicated HR/HRIS platform, from $10/employee/month (or a $250/month flat rate for 25 or fewer employees)
  • Homebase — best for hourly and shift-based teams, free for one location with up to 10 employees; paid plans from $30/month
  • Zoho People — best for affordability, free for up to 5 employees; paid plans from $1.50/employee/month
  • Justworks — best PEO for benefits without an in-house HR team, from $50/month plus $8/employee/month for payroll-only, or $79+/employee/month for full PEO service
  • Deel — best for hiring and managing a global or remote team, core HR platform free; global payroll from $29/employee/month
  • OnPay — best value for the features you get, from $49/month plus $6/employee/month

What makes HR software worth paying for?

Not every small business needs the same things from an HR tool, but there’s a fairly short list of jobs it has to do well once you’ve got even a handful of W-2 employees:

  • Payroll and tax filing. This is the one area where “just use a spreadsheet” stops being a viable option. Miscalculate a withholding or miss a filing deadline, and you’re not dealing with an annoyed employee — you’re dealing with a government agency.
  • Benefits administration. Health insurance, retirement plans, workers’ comp — even if you’re not offering much yet, you’ll want software that can grow into this rather than force a total platform switch later.
  • Onboarding and self-service. New hires should be able to fill out their own tax forms and direct deposit info online, and existing employees should be able to check their own pay stubs and PTO balance without emailing you about it.
  • Compliance support. Labor laws vary by state, and sometimes by city, and they change often enough that “we’ll figure it out” is a real risk, not just an inconvenience.
  • Room to grow. The tool that fits 3 employees shouldn’t require a full migration at 15. Add-on modules beat a hard ceiling.

I weighted these picks toward platforms that nail the basics cheaply, since most small businesses don’t need, and shouldn’t pay for enterprise HR complexity.

One more thing before we get into it: HR software pricing is a genuine mess to research. Almost none of these companies publish a single, stable rate card, and the numbers shift by a few dollars between the vendor’s own pages and whatever third-party tracker you check next. I’ve used each company’s most recently published figures below. Treat them as a strong starting estimate, not gospel, and confirm the current number before you sign anything.

Advertisement

1. Rippling

Best for: small businesses that want room to grow into IT and finance tools later

Pros:

  • Combines HR, IT device management, and finance in one system
  • Powerful no-code workflow automation (“if this happens, do that”)
  • Modular pricing means you pay only for what you use

Cons:

  • No published starting price you can fully trust — everything requires a custom quote
  • No free trial, only a sales demo

Rippling’s whole pitch is that HR shouldn’t live in a silo. Its “Rippling Unity” platform starts with core HR, employee records, onboarding, time off, org charts and then lets you bolt on payroll, benefits, IT device provisioning, and even company card and expense management, all sharing the same employee data. That’s the actual differentiator: when someone’s hired, Rippling can automatically provision their laptop and software access in the same workflow that processes their first paycheck. Fire someone, and it can pull that access back just as fast.

The flexibility comes at the cost of a straight answer on price. Rippling’s own materials cite the core platform at around $8 per employee per month, though the base monthly fee attached to that number has shown up as anywhere from $35 to $40 depending on which page you land on and payroll, benefits, and IT are all separate add-ons priced on request. For a 50-person company running HR, payroll, and benefits together, published estimates land somewhere in the $15–$25-per-employee-per-month range, though your mileage will vary considerably.

If you’re a five-person team that just needs payroll and PTO tracking, this is probably more firepower than you need. But if you can already picture needing device management or multi-entity payroll a year or two out, the sales call is worth your time.

Advertisement

Rippling pricing: From roughly $8/employee/month plus a monthly base fee; full pricing (payroll, benefits, IT) requires a custom quote

2. Gusto

Best for: small teams that want payroll handled correctly and don’t want to think about it again

Pros:

  • Unlimited payroll runs and automatic federal, state, and local tax filing on every plan
  • Transparent, published pricing, a rarity in this category
  • Easy to set up without outside help

Con:

  • HR features stay fairly basic until you reach the Premium plan, and multi-state payroll requires upgrading to Plus

Gusto built its reputation on making payroll boring in the best possible way. Run payroll, and it calculates and files the taxes; W-2s and 1099s show up automatically at year-end, no separate accountant conversation required for the basics. The Simple plan covers single-state payroll and a self-service portal where employees can view pay stubs and manage their own benefits enrollment.

Where Gusto asks you to pay more is HR depth. Plus ($80/month plus $12 per employee) adds multi-state payroll, time tracking, PTO policies, and next-day direct deposit — the stuff most growing teams need within their first year anyway. Premium ($180/month plus $22 per employee) adds access to certified HR experts and compliance alerts, which starts to look less like software and more like an HR hotline with a payroll system attached.

Advertisement

If payroll accuracy and tax compliance are the actual headache, not performance reviews or org charts, Gusto is the least complicated fix.

Gusto pricing: Simple, $49/month + $6/employee/month; Plus, $80/month + $12/employee/month; Premium, $180/month + $22/employee/month

3. BambooHR

Best for: businesses that want a dedicated HR system without folding in IT or finance tools

Pros:

Advertisement
  • Clean interface that doesn’t require weeks of onboarding to learn
  • Solid applicant tracking built in, not bolted on
  • Automatic volume discounts as headcount grows

Cons:

  • Payroll, benefits, and time tracking all cost extra
  • Pricing climbed in 2026, with a new top-tier Elite plan landing at $25 per employee per month

BambooHR is HR software built by people who apparently remember what it’s like to actually do HR. Employee records, time-off requests, onboarding checklists, and reporting all live in one dashboard that reviewers consistently describe as easy to pick up without training, a real advantage when you’re also the one training yourself. Core (from $10 per employee per month) covers the essentials: records, workflows and approvals, applicant tracking, and time-off management, plus a basic AI assistant that can tell you how much PTO someone has left without you digging through a report.

Move up to Pro ($17/employee/month) for performance management and employee community features, or Elite ($25/employee/month) for the top tier. Companies with 25 or fewer employees skip per-employee pricing entirely and pay a flat $250 a month instead — worth knowing before you assume the per-seat math applies to you.

Payroll, full benefits administration, and time tracking are all separate paid add-ons requiring their own quotes, though BambooHR does offer a bundle discount for combining payroll and benefits. Budget for that ahead of time rather than assuming Core covers everything.

BambooHR pricing: Core, from $10/employee/month; Pro, from $17/employee/month; Elite, from $25/employee/month; flat $250/month for companies with 25 or fewer employees

4. Homebase

Best for: restaurants, retail shops, and any small business built around hourly, shift-based work

Advertisement

Pros:

  • A genuinely usable free plan, not just a trial
  • Scheduling and time tracking built specifically for hourly teams, including GPS clock-ins
  • Payroll syncs cleanly with the scheduling and timesheet data you’re already generating

Cons:

  • Priced per location, which can work against multi-site businesses with small headcounts per site
  • PTO controls are locked behind the $70/month Plus tier

If your team clocks in and out rather than logging on from a laptop, most HR software wasn’t really built with you in mind, Homebase was. The free Basic plan covers one location and up to 10 employees with real scheduling and time-tracking tools, not a stripped-down demo. Outgrow that, and Essentials ($30/month per location) unlocks unlimited employees at that location, plus advanced scheduling, GPS-verified time punches, and team messaging.

The scheduling-and-time-clock combination is where Homebase earns its keep: managers build a schedule and watch labor costs update in real time, while employees get alerts if their shift changes or they’re about to miss a break, which matters for labor law compliance in a lot of states, not just convenience.

Payroll isn’t bundled into any tier, it’s a $39/month plus $6-per-active-employee add-on regardless of plan but it pulls straight from your existing timesheets, so hours worked and hours paid match without extra reconciling.

Homebase pricing: Free for one location (up to 10 employees); Essentials, $30/month/location; Plus, $70/month/location; All-in-One, $120/month/location; payroll add-on, $39/month + $6/employee/month

Advertisement

5. Zoho People

Best for: small businesses that want solid HR features without a big monthly bill

Pros:

  • The cheapest genuinely full-featured HR software on this list
  • Free plan for teams of 5 or fewer, no time limit
  • Zia, Zoho’s AI assistant, can handle time-off requests and answer basic HR questions conversationally

Cons:

  • Payroll and recruiting require separate Zoho products, purchased and billed on their own
  • Fewer employee-experience extras than pricier competitors like BambooHR

Zoho has an app for nearly every business function, and Zoho People is its HR entry, built to stay affordable at every tier rather than just the entry level. Essential HR runs $1.50 per employee per month with no minimum headcount, covering onboarding, employee records, time-off management, shift scheduling, and document management. That’s a usable feature set for the price of a coffee per employee.

Higher tiers add real depth without a steep jump: Professional ($2/employee/month) adds attendance management and timesheets, Premium ($3/employee/month) adds performance management and HR analytics, and Enterprise ($4.50/employee/month) adds an HR help desk and learning management tools.

The real limitation is that Zoho People can’t run payroll or hiring on its own, those jobs go to Zoho Payroll and Zoho Recruit, separate subscriptions with their own bills. If you’re fine managing two connected apps instead of one, the combined cost still beats most of this list.

Advertisement

Zoho People pricing: Free for up to 5 employees; Essential HR, $1.50/employee/month; Professional, $2/employee/month; Premium, $3/employee/month; Enterprise, $4.50/employee/month

6. Justworks

Best for: small businesses that want big-company benefits without hiring an HR department to manage them

Pros:

  • Full PEO service gives small teams access to enterprise-level health benefits
  • 24/7 support and compliance guidance included on PEO plans
  • Straightforward per-employee pricing with no base fee on the PEO tiers

Cons:

  • Meaningfully pricier than standard HRIS [human resources information system, the general category of employee-records-and-workflow software, as opposed to a PEO] or payroll software
  • No free trial
  • Co-employment isn’t the right structure for every business type

Everything else on this list is HR software. Justworks is a PEO, which means it doesn’t just sell you a dashboard, it becomes a co-employer of your team on paper, which lets a five-person company plug into the same large-group health insurance rates a 500-person company gets. For a small business competing for talent against bigger employers, that can be the whole ballgame.

The standalone Payroll plan ($50/month plus $8/employee/month) is the entry point if you’re not ready for full PEO service: tax filing, PTO management, and basic HR tools, no co-employment structure attached. PEO Basic (around $79/employee/month, no base fee) adds compliance support, 401(k) access, and workers’ comp. PEO Plus (roughly $109–$124/employee/month) layers in health, dental, and vision benefits administration on top.

Advertisement

Read our full breakdown of what a PEO actually is if you’re weighing this against a standard HRIS. Short version: this isn’t the cheapest way to run payroll, but it’s often the cheapest way to offer benefits that compete with a bigger employer’s.

Justworks pricing: Payroll only, $50/month + $8/employee/month; PEO Basic, from ~$79/employee/month; PEO Plus, from ~$109/employee/month

7. Deel

Best for: startups and small businesses hiring across borders

Pros:

Advertisement
  • Core HR platform is free
  • Employer of Record [EOR — a service that legally employs your workers in a country where you don’t have your own entity, so you can hire there compliantly] service in 150+ countries
  • One system for managing employees and international contractors together

Cons:

  • EOR pricing is steep: $599 per employee per month at the standard tier
  • Global payroll carries a roughly $1,000 setup fee on top of the monthly rate

Deel exists for a problem most HR software ignores: what happens when your third hire lives in Lisbon and your fourth lives in Manila? The free Deel HR tier covers the basics – employee directories, time-off management, document storage for any team, domestic or global. From there, Global Payroll runs $29 per employee per month for countries where you already have a legal entity, and Contractor Management ($49/contractor/month) handles compliant agreements and payments in 120-plus currencies.

No local entity, and need Deel to be the legal employer instead? That’s Employer of Record, and it’s expensive – $599 per employee per month, climbing to $899 at the enterprise tier – reflecting the legal and compliance infrastructure required in each country. Against the cost and timeline of setting up a foreign subsidiary, though, it’s often still the faster and cheaper option for a growing startup.

Every employee living in the same state as you makes Deel’s global machinery overkill. A distributed or growth-stage startup, on the other hand, may find it’s the only tool on this list built for the way hiring actually happens now.

Deel pricing: Core HR platform, free; Global Payroll, $29/employee/month; Contractor Management, $49/contractor/month; Employer of Record, from $599/employee/month

8. OnPay

Best for: small businesses that want solid payroll and HR features without paying for a big brand name

Advertisement

Pros:

  • Straightforward, published pricing with no hidden per-plan tiers to decode
  • Free HR tools bundled with the base payroll plan
  • First month free, including setup and data migration

Cons:

  • No dedicated time-tracking tool built in
  • No volume discounts for larger teams

OnPay doesn’t try to be everything – it’s a well-built payroll platform with useful HR tools layered on top, priced simply enough that you can do the math yourself instead of requesting a quote. Payroll Essentials ($49/month plus $6 per worker) covers unlimited payroll runs, tax filing across all 50 states, contractor payments, and a self-service employee portal.

The HR add-on ($15/month plus $2 per employee) brings in PTO workflows, org charts, expanded onboarding, and document management – handy once you’re managing more than payroll, skippable if payroll is genuinely all you need right now. Compliance Resources and Live HR Support round out the optional add-ons for businesses that want more hand-holding on the regulatory side.

It won’t out-feature the platforms built for enterprise scale. For a small business that mostly needs payroll done right, plus a few HR basics and no steep learning curve, it punches well above its price tag.

OnPay pricing: Payroll Essentials, $49/month + $6/employee/month; HR add-on, +$15/month + $2/employee/month

Advertisement

So which one should you pick?

It mostly comes down to what’s breaking right now. Payroll errors and tax deadlines are the most urgent to fix, so start with Gusto or OnPay if that’s the pain point. Managing hourly shift workers? Homebase was built for exactly that. Trying to offer real health benefits on a small-business budget? Look at Justworks. And if the whole story is budget, Zoho People gives you more HR software per dollar than almost anything else on the market.

Whatever you land on, the real win isn’t the software. It’s never filling out anyone’s W-4 by hand again.

For readers who just want payroll and nothing else, our roundup of free payroll software for small business covers the $0 options before you consider paying for any of this.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business & Hussles

Market veterans favour value plays over crowded, expensive themes

Published

on

Market veterans favour value plays over crowded, expensive themes
After two difficult years for Indian equities, there is scope for reasonable returns as valuations turn less demanding, according to senior market participants who spoke to ET. Large caps look better placed, while the outlook is more cautious on mid- and small-caps. Financials, manufacturing and consumption are among the preferred themes, while views on technology are sharply divided

NEELESH SURANA, CIO, Mirae Asset Mutual Fund

MARKET OUTLOOK: India looks better positioned than sentiment suggests and is a natural hedge against crowded AI trade. Valuations are no longer a headwind, while domestic fundamentals are sound. Any global trade rotation could be meaningful. Key risks are elevated crude, rising developed market bond yields, El Niño and heavy equity issuance. Overall, we expect low-teens returns.
PREFERRED INVESTMENT STRATEGY: Our strategy is a barbell, combining quality stocks with strong earnings upgrades at sensible valuations with holding sector leaders that have corrected over the past two years and are now in value zone.

THEMES LOOKING ATTRACTIVE: Banking, consumer discretionary, healthcare and manufacturing. Sector leaders, impacted by FPI selling over the last two years, are now attractive.

THEMES TO STAY AWAY FROM: Slow-growth or disruption prone sectors like consumer staples and IT. Cautious on narrative-driven, richly-valued sectors like capital goods.


Read more: Goldman Sachs identifies 42 Indian stocks riding AI build-out

JANAKIRAMAN RENGARAJU, CIO – India Equities Templeton Global Investments

MARKET OUTLOOK: The 12-month base case for Indian equities may not be quite euphoric, but it is constructive. Largecap valuations are more reasonable, while higher mid- and small-cap multiples call for greater prudence. Globally, the picture has deteriorated. Unresolved conflicts have entrenched inflationary pressures, while rising interest rates and heavy fiscal debt reinforce each other. Tariff uncertainty continues to cloud trade growth, while questions are emerging over the viability of massive AI investments, even as enthusiasm and valuations remain elevated.PREFERRED INVESTMENT STRATEGY: Adopt a tone of ‘cautious optimism’ over the medium term.

Advertisement

THEMES LOOKING ATTRACTIVE: Financials, industrials and capital goods, consumption and electronic manufacturing, which are linked to capex pick up, rising affluence and credit growth.

THEMES TO STAY AWAY FROM: Avoid expensive small and mid-caps with weak cash generation and businesses dependent on endless equity funding.

Read more: SIPs offer steady gains as most fund categories beat benchmark indices

ANISH TAWAKLEY, CIO, DSP Mutual Fund

MARKET OUTLOOK: Economy remains in good shape, while valuations are now neutral. This should translate into reasonable market returns broadly in line with earnings growth.

Advertisement

PREFERRED INVESTMENT STRATEGY: Don’t chase narratives that have already played out, rather look at sectors that have been underperforming since the last 2-3 years.

THEMES LOOKING ATTRACTIVE: Private banks, insurance companies, automobiles and cement.

THEMES TO STAY AWAY FROM: Careful about companies where promoters are diluting (either through primary or secondary sales) or where private equity is selling, including IPOs. Promoter dilution and PE sales happen when performance and valuations are close to peaks. Cautious on metals, IT and FMCG. For IT, the problem is not AI but the fact that Indian listed companies are losing market share to GCCs set up in India.

R SIVAKUMAR CIO, Axis Mutual Fund

MARKET OUTLOOK: The outlook is constructive. Economic slowdown over the last few quarters appears to be more cyclical than structural. Valuations in parts of the market remain elevated, particularly within mid- and small-caps.

Advertisement

PREFERRED INVESTMENT STRATEGY: Alpha generation is likely to come from selective stock picking rather than broad market direction. A balanced approach across largecaps, which offer valuation comfort and resilience, and select mid-cap opportunities, which continue to deliver superior earnings growth, remains appropriate.

THEMES LOOKING ATTRACTIVE: Constructive on manufacturing, power and electrification, energy transition, select financials, particularly banks and capital-market-linked businesses, as well as export-oriented companies.

THEMES TO STAY AWAY FROM: Investors should avoid chasing momentum in overcrowded themes. In technology, we remain watchful of disruptions and pricing pressures emerging from AI-led changes in the global IT services landscape

SHANKAR SHARMA, Founder, GQuant

MARKET OUTLOOK: Barring occasional rallies, I do not see the Indian markets outperforming the world or even the peer group. The Vaibhav Suryavanshi Syndrome afflicts Indian companies: domestic success is mistaken for globally transferable skill. Largecaps have thrived on India’s easy pitch, building market capitalisation rather than global scale and brands. When domestic growth fades, competing overseas will require an entirely different mindset. There will be pockets where money is going to be made; but in aggregate, Indian returns will disappoint for the coming year.

Advertisement

PREFERRED INVESTMENT STRATEGY: The future of the Indian stock market lies in getting “techified”. Tech has been my theme in the last 2 years since the bear market started in India and I have actually made money even in this very-very tough market. This is not going to change anytime soon. Pharmaceuticals is also going to be a good place to be in.

THEMES LOOKING ATTRACTIVE: For me, tech is 80% of the allocation and pharma is 20% and there is nothing else that I am interested in India.

THEMES TO STAY AWAY FROM: Companies which service the domestic Indian consumer. That trade is on its way out and this is not where I would deploy a lot of capital.

Advertisement
Add ET Logo as a Reliable and Trusted News Source

Continue Reading

Business & Hussles

Accountancy firm Hazlewoods move to larger offices in Cardiff to support expansion

Published

on

Business Live

The firm has relocated to the South Gate House office scheme

The Cardiff team of Hazlewoods

Accountancy and business advisory firm Hazlewoods has relocated to larger offices in Cardiff to support expansion plans.

Having set up its first office in Wales at the Capital Tower office building in 2024, it has now moved its team of 34 to South Gate House.

Advertisement

Tom Davies, director at Hazlewoods Cardiff, said: “This is an exciting step for Hazlewoods and reflects the progress we have made since launching in the city less than two years ago. We have built a very strong team here and have been really encouraged by the response from both new and existing clients, reflecting our commitment to developing deep relationships across the region.

“The new office gives us the space to continue growing while maintaining the collaborative approach that is such an important part of the way we work.”

Bruce Black, corporate tax director, said: “This move creates the environment we need to continue finding and developing local talent to build the team, while maintaining the high level of service our clients expect from Hazlewoods. It reflects just how positively the Cardiff office has developed in such a short space of time.

“The team in Cardiff has done a great job of growing the business and I look forward to seeing that continue. We have the expertise, ambition and people to build a really strong presence in Wales, and the new office gives the team a great base from which to do that.”

Advertisement

Hazlewoods is one of the largest independent accountants and business advisers in the South West and Wales, with more than 600 employees and a growing presence in Cardiff, alongside its offices in Cheltenham and Bristol.

The firm provides audit, accounting, tax and advisory services to corporate and private clients and is particularly well known for its specialist sector expertise across the UK. Last year, the firm recorded a turnover of £54.3m.

Its managing partner, James Morter, said: “It has been very gratifying to see the way that Hazlewoods has been welcomed into Cardiff. Early on, we identified a gap in the Welsh market for a firm of our size and experience, and when you combine that with the talent pool in the city, it felt like a natural next step.”

Property advisory firm Knight Frank represented Hazlewoods on the deal, while its building consultancy team supported the fit-out of the new space.

Advertisement

Mark Sutton, office agency partner at Knight Frank’s Cardiff office, said: “Hazlewoods was looking for a space that could support its continued growth in Wales, while offering excellent connectivity and the flexibility to create a workplace suited to its needs.

“South Gate House provided the right combination of quality space and a prime city-centre location, and it has been a pleasure to support the team through the move.”

Continue Reading

Business & Hussles

Perpetua Resources at Mining Forum Americas 2026: shift to construction

Published

on


Perpetua Resources at Mining Forum Americas 2026: shift to construction

Continue Reading

Business & Hussles

What Trump’s potential US diesel export ban could mean for you

Published

on

A driver returns a fuel nozzle after refueling a tractor trailer with diesel fuel at a Chevron truck stop in Tracy, California.

For the US economy, a ban could deliver short-term relief at the pump by flooding the domestic market with excess supply.

However, energy analysts warn it could backfire.

David Fyfe, chief economist at Argus Media, notes that cutting off American supply would likely cause international prices to skyrocket.

That would push up global freight, food, and industrial costs, ultimately “feeding inflation back into the global economy”.

Advertisement

“At a stroke, the US’s reputation as a reliable supplier of energy to the world would be shot,” Fyfe added.

Removing more than a million barrels of daily American supply would trigger a fierce bidding war among importing nations in Latin America and Europe.

Sarah Raffoul, analytics manager at Argus Media, noted that while higher international prices would eventually curb demand, the immediate gap would severely strain trade relationships and accelerate global inflation.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business & Hussles

Greatland Resources at Mining Forum Americas 2026: cash-rich growth push

Published

on


Greatland Resources at Mining Forum Americas 2026: cash-rich growth push

Continue Reading

Business & Hussles

Canadian defence creating 250 jobs in Merthyr in new research alliance

Published

on

Business Live

Its new research alliance is with two Welsh universities and one in Canada

Marshall Land Systems

Marshall Land Systems

A Canadian-owned defence firm which is relocating its UK production from Cambridge to South Wales has forged a new research alliance with universities on both sides of the Atlantic.

Marshall Land Systems, whose new factory site in Merthyr will reach production capacity at the end of the year with 160 staff, has set up the Marshall Land Research Alliance alongside the universities of Cardiff, South Wales, and New Brunswick in Canada.

Advertisement

The firm’s deployable infrastructure ranges CT scanners and medical facilities to mechanical maintenance and command centres. Its new assembly plant was chosen after a UK-wide search, and will produce deployable infrastructure that will protect NATO personnel on operations, humanitarian missions, and on bases.

The alliance together leading academics and technology experts to explore new technologies in the field of deployable infrastructure for military and humanitarian use.

A signed memorandum of understanding will unable technology transfer, staff exchanges and joint research and development work.

Over the next five years, based on its current order book alone, Marshall is confident of growing its workforce in Merthyr to 250. However, with the UK Government and other countries committing more of their budgets to defence and security, Marshall is well positioned to win additional contracts that could see even more jobs created at its Merthyr site.

Advertisement

The firm’s deployable infrastructure ranges CT scanners and medical facilities to mechanical maintenance and command centres.

Its new assembly plant was chosen after a UK-wide search, and will produce deployable infrastructure that will protect NATO personnel on operations, humanitarian missions, and on bases.

The average salary at the factory will be around £32,000, while Marshall is also looking to take on around 15 apprentices.

The firm has entered into a 15-year lease with the owner of the building, Figsand, with an option to acquire it. The Merthyr site extends to 191,600 sq ft and occupies 8.2 acres at Merthyr Industrial Park.

Advertisement

Marshall Land Systems chief executive, Gareth Williams, said: “In an increasingly volatile world, the long-standing and fundamental alliance between Canada and the UK is becoming ever more important. As NATO allies invest to protect our way of life, this transatlantic research alliance will bring together the smartest brains in support of the effort to keep us safe and the world stable.

“We’re proud to be convening this vital joint work between Wales and New Brunswick under the Marshall Land Research Alliance.”

Professor Louise Bright, pro vice chancellor for enterprise, engagement, and partnerships at the University of South Wales, said:“We are proud to be a founding partner in the Marshall Land Research Alliance, a bold collaboration that will help shape the future of innovation, skills and advanced manufacturing in South Wales.

” USW’s strengths in research, advanced manufacturing and skills development position us to connect industry, talent and innovation in ways that deliver real impact.

Advertisement

“This partnership will create valuable opportunities for our students and staff to work alongside leading industry partners on real-world challenges, while helping businesses develop the skills and expertise they need to grow.

“With Marshall Land Systems establishing a major new facility in South Wales, this Alliance comes at a pivotal moment for the region. Together, we can support innovation, expand opportunities for graduates and help drive long-term economic growth across Wales.”

Professor Roger Whitaker, Cardiff University’s pro vice-chancellor for research, innovation and enterprise, said: “Cardiff University is pleased to be a founding partner in the Marshall Land Research Alliance, bringing together academic and industry expertise to support research, innovation and skills development in areas including advanced manufacturing, engineering and defence.

The alliance provides opportunities for our staff to work with partners on research, innovation and workforce development. It also comes at an important time for South Wales, with the potential to support new collaborations between universities, industry and government.

Advertisement

Through research, knowledge exchange and skills development, we hope to contribute to opportunities for students, graduate employment, businesses and communities, while supporting the long-term strength and resilience of the Welsh economy through research and innovation.”

Dr David MaGee, vice president research at the University of New Brunswick said: “We take great pride in fostering strong, mutually beneficial partnerships that help us make a meaningful impact in Canada and around the world. I look forward to working with Marshall Land Systems, Cardiff University, and the University of South Wales to advance innovative technologies and contribute to Canada’s NATO commitments.

“By leveraging our academic expertise and learning from our collaborators, we will address common challenges and create lasting benefits for our institutions, our industries, and our countries.”

As well as its Canadian and UK operations, Marshall Land Systems has a factory in the Netherlands. It currently has a global workforce of 600.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business & Hussles

Andreessen Horowitz backs AI-era college alternative with $42M

Published

on

Andreessen Horowitz backs AI-era college alternative with $42M

Andreessen Horowitz is putting $42 million behind a new education venture aimed at young tech builders who might otherwise head to college, betting that the artificial intelligence boom is creating demand for a different path into Silicon Valley.

The Horowitz Andreessen Academy, a for-profit company incubated by the venture capital firm known as a16z, plans to bring its first class of roughly 50 students to San Francisco in September 2027 for a tuition-free, one-year fellowship.

Advertisement

Instead of relying heavily on traditional academic credentials, the academy says admissions will focus on what applicants have already built, shipped or earned. Students will spend much of the program working on projects and learning from technology executives and entrepreneurs rather than taking traditional tests and completing homework.

EMPLOYEES AT AI COMPANIES BACK BERNIE SANDERS BILL CRACKING DOWN ON DEVELOPMENT

Gagan Biyani speaks onstage at TechCrunch Disrupt SF 2015 in San Francisco in 2015

Gagan Biyani speaks at TechCrunch Disrupt SF 2015 in San Francisco on Sept. 23, 2015. (Steve Jennings/Getty Images for TechCrunch)

The approach represents a Silicon Valley experiment in how education could change as AI reshapes the skills companies seek from workers and founders.

“In our estimation, the AI revolution is going to be as transformational to jobs as the Industrial Revolution was to the agricultural society that came before it,” said Ben Horowitz, co-founder and general partner at a16z. “The training that worked for the Industrial Revolution isn’t going to map perfectly onto the AI revolution, so somebody has to pioneer how you train a person for this new world. That’s what we built the Academy to do. This isn’t just an investment idea for us. It’s an investment in the future of the country.”

Advertisement

A16z is joined in the $42 million investment by technology executives and investors including Shopify CEO Tobi Lütke, DoorDash CEO Tony Xu, Quora co-founder Adam D’Angelo, Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan and Palantir Chief Technology Officer Shyam Sankar.

NEW YORK OVERTAKES SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AS LARGEST US TECH TALENT MARKET BY WORKFORCE SIZE

Ben Horowitz walks outside in Sun Valley, Idaho.

Co-founder of Andreessen Horowitz, Ben Horowitz walks to a morning session at the Allen & Company Sun Valley Conference on July 9, 2021 in Sun Valley, Idaho. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

The venture has also lined up Google, Meta, Nvidia, OpenAI, Anthropic, Coinbase, Palantir, Stripe, Anduril and Replit as founding partners. The companies will provide resources and expertise, including software, hardware and computing power, according to the academy.

Ticker Security Last Change Change %
GOOGL ALPHABET INC. 343.92 +1.56 +0.46%
META META PLATFORMS INC. 723.05 -28.61 -3.81%
NVDA NVIDIA CORP. 231.55 +6.48 +2.88%

Each student is expected to receive more than $50,000 in computing credits and other technology resources, along with a $5,000 travel and exploration budget. Courses will cover areas including AI systems, sales, fundraising, finance and startup formation.

Advertisement

Gagan Biyani, who co-founded online learning company Udemy and later founded Maven, is leading the academy as founder and CEO. Marc Andreessen and a16z general partner Erik Torenberg will join him on its board.

College students sit in a lecture hall as a student takes notes during class.

College students attend a lecture in a classroom. (iStock)

CLICK HERE TO GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO

The fellowship is designed primarily for high school graduates and can serve as a gap year or college deferral. The academy plans to seek regulatory approval for a two-year program that could begin in fall 2028, with tuition expected to be comparable to elite private universities.

The company is separate from Andreessen Horowitz despite its close ties to the venture capital firm.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business & Hussles

Bob Chapek on Disney Bob Iger power battle: Raised concerns weekly

Published

on

Bob Chapek on Disney Bob Iger power battle: Raised concerns weekly

Former Disney CEO Bob Chapek said Monday he voiced concerns about then-Executive Chairman Bob Iger to the company’s board “weekly” during his brief tenure as head of the House of Mouse.

Chapek has remained tight-lipped about his firing from the media giant nearly four years ago, but opened up about his experience in a new tell-all memoir, “Behind the Castle Walls: My Thirty Years at the Happiest Place on Earth,” and in an interview with CNBC’s “Squawk Box.”

Once head of Disney’s theme park and experiences division, Chapek was tapped to take the helm of the company just weeks before the Covid pandemic shuttered movie theaters and amusement parks around the globe in 2020. As Chapek worked to navigate these challenges, Iger remained with the company to handle Disney’s content initiatives like Disney+.

However, Iger slowly began to reassert control, Chapek says. The ensuing power struggle was detailed in a CNBC report in 2023.

Advertisement

“When I started hearing about lunches that he had and dinners that he had where he was absolutely trashing me, and I’d hear it two, three times in the same week, the same bullet points, the same talking points, I was like, ‘I’ve got a problem,’” Chapek told CNBC.

He noted that when he brought concerns to the Disney board about Iger, he was told, “‘He’ll be gone in two years. It’s OK. That’s Bob being Bob.’”

But almost three years after being named CEO, Chapek was ousted and replaced by Iger, who returned to the post until March 2026.

“It would have been great if, like other CEOs, he acted as a steward of my new role,” Chapek said. “It would have been one thing if he was neutral, but to be actually working against me, actively, I thought was just unbelievable.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business & Hussles

Romania, Georgia and Latvia Lead Latest WHO-Based Ranking

Published

on

Representation. Beer cans.

Romania drinks more alcohol per person than any other country, followed by Georgia and Latvia, according to the most recent internationally comparable data, which draws on World Health Organization figures. The sources reviewed contain no country-by-country count of alcohol consumed in 2026 so far; the newest full dataset is a three-year average labeled 2022 that was retrieved from the WHO’s Global Health Observatory this year.

The ranking, published by The Facts Institute and updated on August 31, measures average annual recorded consumption per person aged 15 and older in liters of pure alcohol. On that measure, the ten heaviest-drinking countries are:

  1. Romania, 17.1 liters
  2. Georgia, 15.5 liters
  3. Latvia, 14.7 liters
  4. Moldova, 14.1 liters
  5. Czechia, 13.7 liters
  6. Lithuania, 12.2 liters
  7. Namibia, 12.0 liters
  8. Poland, 11.9 liters
  9. Austria, 11.8 liters
  10. Bulgaria, 11.5 liters

Belarus, Saint Lucia and Seychelles follow, tied at 11.4 liters each, according to the WHO figures in the Facts Institute table. World Population Review, which also treats 2022 as the most recent data available as of 2026, reports the same leaders: Romania at 17.1 liters, then Georgia at 15.5, Latvia at 14.7, Moldova at 14.1 and Czechia at 13.7. It says Lithuania, Poland, Bulgaria, Belarus, Hungary and Slovakia all reported annual consumption above 11 liters per person.

The gap between Romania and the global picture is wide. The Facts Institute noted that consumption above 14 liters of pure alcohol per person per year is roughly equivalent to about three standard bottles of wine per person each week. Because drinks vary in strength, the WHO measures pure alcohol rather than volumes of beer, wine or spirits. The site explained that a liter of wine, at about 12% alcohol by volume, contains roughly 0.12 liters of pure alcohol, so a person consuming 6 liters of pure alcohol a year would drink the equivalent of about 50 liters of wine, or about a liter a week.

Europe dominates the list. Central and Eastern European countries lead the rankings, and 22 of the top 30 countries are in Europe, according to the Facts Institute. Namibia, in seventh place with 12 liters, is the highest-ranked country outside Europe, and Seychelles and Saint Lucia also record some of the world’s highest levels, making them exceptions to the largely European pattern. World Population Review said beer, wine and spirits all play major cultural roles across much of Eastern and Central Europe, and that higher-income countries generally report higher consumption because alcohol is more affordable and widely available, though wealth alone does not determine drinking habits.

Advertisement

Several large economies sit just outside the top ten. According to the WHO table, Germany, France, Australia and Portugal each recorded 11.2 liters, the United Kingdom 10.9 liters, Russia 10.5 liters and the United States 9.8 liters. Russia, long associated with heavy drinking, has fallen well down the list, WorldRankd noted in a separate ranking. Canada recorded 10.0 liters, and Spain and Slovakia 11.0 liters each.

At the other end of the scale, consumption is close to zero in parts of North Africa and the Middle East, where religious and cultural norms discourage or prohibit drinking, the Facts Institute said. Yemen, Somalia, Bangladesh, Sudan, Mauritania, Libya, Afghanistan, Syria, Pakistan and Kuwait are among the countries with the lowest recorded consumption, and Iran, Indonesia and Egypt also round to near zero.

The numbers are estimates, and the WHO publishes confidence intervals. Romania’s figure of 17.1 liters, for example, carries a range of 14.6 to 19.8 liters, and Georgia’s 15.5 liters ranges from 12.9 to 17.9. Those ranges overlap with countries lower on the list, which means the ordering among places with similar totals is not exact. That is why some countries share a rounded figure and why the Facts Institute listed 13 countries in its top group.

Different sources produce slightly different results. StatsPanda, which uses a World Bank series compiled from WHO data and includes estimated unrecorded consumption, puts Romania at 16.8 liters, Georgia at 14.4 liters and Latvia at 12.9 liters, using the latest available year from 2015 onward. Another ranking of 2025 data listed Latvia in fourth place at about 13.1 liters, followed by Uganda at 12.2 and Germany at 12.2, and it named Lithuania as tenth at 11.8 liters. Such differences reflect vintage, methodology and whether unrecorded, homemade or informal alcohol is counted.

Advertisement

The global context is lower. Worldwide annual consumption in 2019 was equal to 5.5 liters of pure alcohol per person aged 15 and older, down from 5.7 liters in 2010, according to the WHO figures summarized on Wikipedia. The WHO European Region had the highest regional average at 9.2 liters, followed by the Region of the Americas at 7.5 liters. About 44% of the population aged 15 and older were current drinkers in 2019. Alcohol use is estimated to cause about 2.6 million deaths a year worldwide, according to the WHO’s 2024 global report as cited by Statsipedia and the Facts Institute. The Facts Institute added that the countries that drink the most can suffer more alcohol-related health and social problems.

None of the sources reviewed included statements from health officials or the countries ranked, and the WHO’s own data has a lag of several years, so the list does not capture changes in drinking habits since 2022.

Readers looking for a 2026 tally will not find one in the sources reviewed. Until the WHO updates its indicator, the Romania-led list remains the most recent international snapshot of who drinks the most.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business & Hussles

Energy bills: What is happening to gas and electricity prices?

Published

on

A woman with shoulder-length blonde hair talks into a microphone

Although the price cap sets the unit prices for gas and electricity, your household’s actual bill depends on the overall amount of energy you use, and how you pay for it.

Where you live, the type of property you have, how energy efficient it is, how many people live there, and the weather all make a difference.

The Ofgem cap is based on “typical” household energy use in a year with a single bill for gas and electricity settled by direct debit.

The vast majority of people pay their bill this way to help spread payments across the year.

Advertisement

In July, Ofgem reduced what it believes to be a “typical” level of energy use, because many homes have cut back due to high prices in recent years while energy efficiency has improved.

Its new estimate is 9,500 kWh of gas and 2,500 kWh of electricity a year.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025