LOS ANGELES — Meghan Markle has returned to California after a whirlwind four-day visit to Australia with Prince Harry, sharing never-before-seen footage of their trip and drawing both praise for community engagement and sharp criticism over the quasi-royal nature of the tour.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex touched down in Sydney earlier this month for their first visit to Australia since 2018. The trip blended philanthropy, public appearances and subtle brand promotion, with large crowds greeting the couple at several stops despite pre-tour debate about the visit’s value to the country.

Meghan, 44, posted a heartfelt Instagram reel highlighting moments from the tour, including walks near the Sydney Opera House, interactions with locals and a warm homecoming where their children Archie and Lilibet greeted them with a “welcome home” banner. The video captured candid scenes that fans described as authentic and joyful.

One standout clip showed Meghan offering marriage advice to a bride-to-be during a visit to Bondi Beach lifeguards. Speaking to fan Ellie via her father, the Duchess emphasized that “the marriage is more important than the wedding,” drawing from her own experience approaching her eighth wedding anniversary with Harry on May 19.

The couple paid respects to victims of the Bondi stabbing attack, meeting survivors and first responders in an emotional tribute to the 15 people killed. They also attended charity events and community gatherings, with Harry participating in initiatives tied to his Invictus Games work.

Meghan made a high-profile appearance as a guest judge on MasterChef Australia, earning praise from a former producer for her professionalism, conciseness and charm on set. The episode generated significant buzz and aligned with her lifestyle brand interests.

The tour has ignited intense discussion. Supporters celebrated the couple’s ability to draw crowds and connect with Australians independently, with some outlets framing it as a “powerful message” of self-reliance without palace support. Critics, including commentators like Piers Morgan and Sky News contributors, labeled the trip “tone deaf,” “narcissistic” and a “faux royal tour,” accusing the Sussexes of monetizing their titles while defying the late Queen Elizabeth II’s wishes for them to step back fully.

Analysts noted Meghan’s strategic trademark filing for her As Ever lifestyle brand in Australia shortly before the visit, fueling speculation about future commercial expansion Down Under. The couple has faced ongoing scrutiny over perceived half-in, half-out royal activities despite their 2020 departure from senior roles.

Insiders report behind-the-scenes pressure and discussions about potentially reintegrating Harry and Meghan into some form of royal life, though sources close to the palace describe such ideas as “worrying” and unlikely to materialize. King Charles III continues to navigate complex family dynamics amid health challenges and broader monarchy modernization efforts.

Upon returning home, Meghan shared additional personal touches, including family moments and reflections on the trip. The couple’s children reportedly prepared a special welcome, underscoring the priority they place on family life in Montecito.

The Australia visit fits into a busier 2026 for the Sussexes. Meghan continues building As Ever, recently sharing New Year reset rituals and maintaining a lower public profile on certain projects after reported shifts with Netflix. Harry focuses on philanthropic endeavors, including veterans’ causes.

Public opinion remains deeply divided. Polls and social media sentiment show strong support among younger audiences and in Commonwealth nations, while traditional royal watchers express skepticism about the couple’s independent path. The tour has reignited conversations about the future of the monarchy and the Sussexes’ place within — or outside — it.

Meghan has spoken openly in recent years about the intense scrutiny she faces, once describing herself as one of the most trolled people globally. During the Australia trip, she addressed social media harms in Melbourne alongside Harry, drawing from personal experience.

Supporters highlight the couple’s continued charity work, environmental advocacy and efforts to create a new model of public life. Critics point to perceived contradictions between privacy requests and high-profile activities. The debate shows little sign of quieting as the Sussexes maintain a visible presence on the global stage.

As they settle back into life in California, Meghan and Harry face a packed schedule. Future plans reportedly include more international engagements, brand growth and family milestones. The couple celebrated their anniversary privately last year and is expected to mark this year’s quietly while navigating public interest.

The Australia tour, despite mixed reviews, demonstrated the Sussexes’ enduring draw. Large crowds, media coverage and brand opportunities underscored their continued relevance eight years after stepping back from royal duties. Whether this model sustains long-term remains a central question in royal commentary.

For now, Meghan Markle appears focused on balancing motherhood, entrepreneurship and advocacy. Her latest social media posts emphasize gratitude for the Australian welcome and excitement for future projects. As one of the most discussed women in the world, every move generates headlines — a reality that shows no signs of changing in 2026.

Shares of Adani Energy Solutions declined 3.3% to their day’s low of Rs 1,317 on the BSE on Friday after it reported a 6% year-on-year (YoY) rise in consolidated net profit to Rs 684 crore for the fourth quarter. Revenue from operations grew 17% YoY to Rs 7,443 crore during the period.

Growth in the quarter was supported by key projects, including Mumbai HVDC, North Karanpura Transmission and Khavda Phase II, which contributed to incremental revenue. Total income, including EPC and service concession income, increased 15%, reflecting higher capex execution and improved performance across segments.

EBITDA rose 5% YoY to Rs 2,372 crore, indicating stable operating performance despite continued investments. Operational EBITDA, which captures core business trends, was higher by 13% YoY.

The company said profitability was driven by strong growth in transmission and smart metering, along with steady performance in the distribution business.

The transmission segment remained the primary contributor, with operating revenue up 7% YoY at Rs 1,286 crore and EBITDA rising 6%. The distribution business saw revenue remain largely unchanged at Rs 2,869 crore, while EBITDA declined 4% YoY, pointing to some pressure in the segment.

Smart metering continued to scale up, with revenue increasing sharply to Rs 215 crore from a low base. EBITDA in this segment also saw a significant rise, reflecting strong execution.
During the quarter, the company commissioned multiple transmission projects, including the Mumbai HVDC project, making it the only private player in India to have executed two such projects.It also crossed the milestone of installing over 1 crore smart meters, strengthening its position in digital power infrastructure.

For the full year FY26, total income stood at Rs 28,325 crore, up 15.9% YoY, while net profit rose to Rs 2,393 crore. On an adjusted basis, profit increased 32% YoY after factoring in one-time items in the previous year. EBITDA for the year reached a record Rs 8,726 crore, up 13%, supported by growth across all key segments.

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)

In what is expected to be a closely watched earnings release, Reliance Industries may report a subdued set of numbers this quarter, with pressure emerging largely from its oil-to-chemicals (O2C) business. Market participants are likely to keep a close eye on the Nifty heavyweight, given its significant influence on the benchmark index.

Speaking to ET Now, Probal Sen from ICICI Securities noted that expectations have already been tempered.

“So, the numbers are likely to be muted, I think that has pretty much been expected for a while. The OTC segment earnings unlike what you see on the paper markets, the fact is that crude costs have been obviously a constraint in this quarter. There has been some diversion of propylene towards basically production of LPG, away from petrochemical. So, petrochemical throughput has also taken a little bit of a hit and on an overall basis therefore the OTC segment earnings or EBITDA is likely to actually decline from about 165 billion in last quarter to less than 140 billion for Q4 and that pretty much drags overall numbers down as well. What we expect is against 460 odd billion EBITDA on a consolidated level should be close to 440 billion and that means that on a net profit level, net earnings post minority would be closer to about 162-163 billion versus 186 odd billion that they reported in Q3. So, results from the other segments are likely to be flattish to small increases, but it is the continued uncertainty and sort of slightly difficult environment for the downstream petroleum space that is dragging numbers down in this quarter.”

The pressure is not limited to refining and petrochemicals. Retail fuel operations could also take a hit due to continued operations despite weak margins.

“So, to answer your first question, yes, retail losses this time because unlike earlier times where because of lower margins you would see shutdowns in the fuel outlets of private refiners, this time they have actually continued to operate the outlets. So, to that extent, yes, even retail losses are another factor that would impact numbers.

“And as far as petchem is concerned, yes, the margins have improved a bit to be honest but slightly lower throughput means that on an overall basis earnings even for the petrochemical segment only grow by low to mid-single digits on a QoQ level, but there is growth there which is primarily led by margin growth because obviously pricing for certain specific chains has definitely improved after probably multiple quarters of weakness, so that is a small positive,” he added.
However, the company’s Special Economic Zone (SEZ) refinery could offer some cushion, particularly due to its insulation from export-related levies.“That is captured in the numbers that I spoke about. Yes, the SEZ refinery, our understanding is that it is not subject to the export taxes, the additional export taxes that have been announced for domestic refiners, because technically speaking the SEZ refinery is not really considered part of the domestic customs area, so to that extent obviously they are more resilient and the results of the OMCs are likely to show more of a decline to that extent in terms of the refining business, but on an overall basis still the very-very high crude and freight costs, the kind of insurance costs that have risen and the differences in terms of the actual physical crude cost versus what we are seeing on our tickers, I think that all plays a role in any case in keeping the numbers muted despite the benefit, let us say, from the SEZ refinery from not having to pay export taxes.”

On the consumer-facing side, Reliance Retail is expected to maintain steady growth, albeit at a measured pace.
“So, frankly, as far as the retail business is concerned, our sense is that there is a low to mid-single digit quarter-on-quarter improvement that one can see. YoY improvement will still be fairly decent in the range of around 7% to 8%.

“So, the retail performance anyway is going to be fairly high or strong but you have to remember that the kind of base that Reliance works from is very different from any other retail player in the country and that does make a difference in terms of how much absolute growth you can actually expect in the current environment. Jio our understanding from our telecom team is that it will be sort of a flattish quarter-on-quarter basis but that still translates into a fairly strong number on a YoY basis or between 10% to 12% in terms of EBITDA,” he added.

As for the impact of investments in quick commerce and online retail, clarity may only emerge after the company’s official briefing.

“We will have to probably wait for the briefing and the numbers to come through before commenting on it. They obviously had already mentioned in the quarter three briefing that there is a bigger push towards quick commerce or the version that they are following as far as JioMart is concerned, so that is obviously going to continue to play a role in terms of margins and overall operational numbers. But let us wait for the briefing before commenting on that.”

Overall, while segments like retail and telecom continue to provide stability, the ongoing challenges in the energy business are expected to weigh on Reliance’s consolidated performance this quarter.

Wall Street major JPMorgan has become the latest investment bank to downgrade the Indian stock market, revising its rating to Neutral from Overweight and delivering a blow by suggesting that the Nifty could plunge to 20,500 in a bear-case scenario. This implies a sharp 15% drop from current levels, as stretched valuations and uncertainty around the Iran war continue to weigh.

The international brokerage said that while India’s long-term structural story remains intact, near-term tactical headwinds call for patience. The brokerage added that these challenges justify a more cautious stance, noting that although the valuation gap has started to narrow, it continues to remain elevated.

It flagged multiple risks to earnings, including potential energy supply disruptions, which could impact companies across sectors. Reflecting this, sector analysts have already cut FY27 earnings estimates by 2% to 10% across key segments. JPMorgan has also lowered its CY26E and CY27E MSCI India EPS growth forecasts by 2% and 1% to 11% and 13%, respectively.

The brokerage highlighted that India’s largecap universe lacks meaningful exposure to high-growth themes such as AI, data centres and semiconductors compared to markets like the US, Korea, China, and Taiwan. It also pointed to monsoon-related risks that could hurt rural incomes and drive food inflation.

Given the current backdrop, the brokerage sees better opportunities in other emerging markets until valuations correct further or earnings visibility improves. Within sectors, it remains overweight on Financials, Materials, Consumer Discretionary, Hospitals, Defence and Power, while staying underweight on IT and Pharma.

JPMorgan has revised its Nifty 50 targets lower, the bull, base, and bear case scenarios are now 30,000, 27,000, and 20,500, respectively, compared to earlier estimates of 33,000, 30,000, and 24,000.
Earlier this week, HSBC downgraded India to underweight from neutral, marking its second cut in the past two months, citing rising inflation risks driven by elevated oil prices and demand pressures that could weigh on earnings growth.“The ongoing West Asia conflict has brought focus back to downside risks for growth, given India’s heavy dependence on imported energy,” the brokerage said in a client note. “While growth has shown signs of improvement over the past two quarters, we expect the recovery to be delayed from here.”

HSBC had earlier lowered India to neutral in late March, pointing to an unfavourable risk-reward balance. Although the March selloff helped ease valuation concerns, the brokerage warned that pressure on corporate profitability could offset this benefit.

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)

Shares of Dr Reddy’s Laboratories declined 2.11% to Rs 1,303 on Friday, as cautious commentary from global brokerages Goldman Sachs and Citigroup dampened investor sentiment and reignited concerns over the company’s near-term growth prospects, according to a research note reported by ETNow.

Goldman Sachs turns cautious, trims outlook sharply

The brokerage downgraded the stock to “Sell” and sharply cut its target price to Rs 1,075 from Rs 1,225, signalling potential downside from current levels.

A key overhang is the much-anticipated opportunity linked to Ozempic, which Goldman Sachs now believes could be smaller in scale and shorter-lived than previously expected. This has raised questions about the company’s near-term growth triggers.

Adding to the pressure, the firm highlighted limited visibility in Dr Reddy’s pipeline, noting a lack of significant high-value launches that could drive earnings momentum. Meanwhile, ongoing price erosion in its core generics business continues to dent profitability.

Reflecting these challenges, Goldman Sachs has cut earnings per share (EPS) estimates by 8-26% for FY26-FY28, indicating a weaker earnings trajectory ahead.
The brokerage also flagged valuation concerns, arguing that the stock’s current multiples are ahead of underlying fundamentals. It now values Dr Reddy’s at around 19x P/E, warning of further downside risk if growth fails to materialise.

Citi remains bearish despite approval optimism

Citigroup also maintained its “Sell” rating on the stock with a target price of Rs 1,070, reinforcing a cautious consensus among global brokerages.

While Dr Reddy’s shares had earlier gained nearly 9% on reports of an unverified generic semaglutide approval in Canada, Citi downplayed the excitement, arguing that even if confirmed, the upside appears overstated given intense competition.

The brokerage estimates FY28 product revenues of around $50 million in a six-player market, while revising FY27 revenue expectations to $80-100 million (up from ~$60 million earlier) in a three-player competitive set including Dr Reddy’s, Sandoz and Apotex.

Citi also expects fourth-quarter FY26 earnings to normalise on a base excluding Revlimid contributions and warned that broader market earnings estimates may need to be revised downward. Its EPS forecasts are already 20%-23% below consensus, underscoring a more conservative stance on earnings growth.

Sentiment turns cautious

With both Goldman Sachs and Citi flagging limited earnings visibility, pipeline uncertainty and stretched valuations, sentiment around Dr Reddy’s has turned notably cautious, despite intermittent optimism around niche product approvals.

(Disclaimer: The recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times.)

As the earnings season unfolds, India’s top IT companies have delivered a mixed set of results, reflecting both near-term pressures and longer-term structural shifts. With major players having reported their quarterly numbers, market participants are now reassessing sectoral strategies amid global uncertainties and evolving industry dynamics.

Speaking to ET Now, market expert Sandip Sabharwal offered a measured view of the current landscape, highlighting the challenges facing the IT sector and the broader market.

“Overall, the results have been muted. Some companies have disappointed more than others. So, HCL Tech disappointed I guess the most in terms of what they reported and guidance. Infosys also has been soft. TCS, as we look at all the results combined now, TCS seems to have fared the best and both in terms of what they reported and the order flows which they have got, but the industry is obviously challenged,” Sabharwal said.

He pointed to a deeper transformation underway in the IT industry, driven by the shift toward artificial intelligence-led delivery models.

“The transition phase to AI driven delivery from purely numbers-led delivery in terms of hours of manpower, that transition is on, which could lead to subdued growth for this year and maybe possibly next year also and then it will be a question of which companies are able to transform and they will then do well,” he added.

Despite the subdued growth outlook, valuations have become more reasonable. “Valuations overall are not very expensive now because Infosys, for example, trades at just around 15 times earnings which is a level which has been more near a historical turf, but at that time the growth prospects are also greater. But given the fact that they are cash generating, the downside also could be limited. So, it is a picture where you do not see much upside but there could also not be substantial downside,” he noted.
Structural Challenges Weigh on IT
When asked whether investors should avoid IT stocks altogether, Sabharwal leaned toward caution.
“Largely yes, because although all sectors are getting challenged right now because of whatever is happening on the oil and commodity front and potential inflation impact, but IT is a sector which is facing structural issues. So, other sectors might be facing short-term issues due to short-term factors, but this is a sector facing structural issues so that is the main problem,” he said.

A Market for Selective Buying
The broader market, too, is navigating a delicate balance between optimism and uncertainty. While geopolitical tensions and commodity price volatility remain concerns, there are also signs of stability.

“We were aggressive buyers in March but right now I would be very-very selective. So, I would not be a big buyer today because of the sheer rally which has happened and the markets actually seem to be positioned not only in India but globally also on an end game, like the conflict ending in one way or the other,” Sabharwal observed.

He also flagged crude oil prices as a key risk factor for the Indian economy. “The second thing is obviously the oil prices which impact the Indian economy in a significant negative manner if they sustain at such high levels,” he said.

Going forward, he suggests a selective approach, particularly in sectors like automobiles where corrections could create opportunities.

Reliance: A Mixed Outlook
All eyes are also on Reliance Industries as it prepares to announce its results. However, Sabharwal cautioned that forecasting performance may be difficult this quarter.

“Reliance numbers are very tough to call this time because retail and telecom should do fine. But what numbers will come out of oil to chemicals business is very-very tough in the face of whatever has happened in terms of crude prices, export duties being imposed, etc, so that is a segment which I find it very difficult to call,” he said.

Still, he believes the company remains reasonably valued from a long-term perspective.

Financials Remain a Bright Spot
In contrast to IT, the banking and financial sector has shown resilience, supported by strong asset quality.

“Yes, banking and financial numbers have been fine. So, the biggest positive I see in most large financial companies, banks and NBFCs combined is the sheer strength of the asset quality of the book where the asset quality has not deteriorated at all,” Sabharwal said, citing examples such as ICICI Bank and HDFC Bank.

However, he acknowledged emerging risks, including potential interest rate hikes and concerns over inflation and monsoon trends.

Metals May Continue to Shine
Among sectors that could benefit from the current macro environment, metals stand out.

“Yes, metal prices could sustain, as such metal stocks could sustain because there are disruptions related to production and as well as price upticks due to the input prices moving up,” Sabharwal explained.

He added that inflationary conditions typically favor such sectors, with steel companies in particular benefiting from recent price increases.

Key Takeaways
As earnings season progresses, the market narrative is increasingly defined by divergence—between sectors facing structural disruption and those benefiting from cyclical or macroeconomic tailwinds. While IT may remain under pressure in the near term, financials and metals offer relative stability. For investors, the message is clear: this is not a time for broad bets, but for careful, selective positioning.