Connect with us

Business

Estee Lauder sues Walmart, alleging sale of counterfeits

Published

on

Estee Lauder sues Walmart, alleging sale of counterfeits

Walmart Inc. signage during the company’s listing at the Nasdaq MarketSite in New York, US, on Tuesday, Dec. 9, 2025.

Michael Nagle | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Estee Lauder sued Walmart in California federal court over allegations the big-box retailer sold counterfeit beauty products on its website and didn’t do enough to ensure only authorized and authentic merchandise was offered to consumers. 

Advertisement

Estee Lauder said it purchased, inspected or tested a number of products sold on Walmart.com that used the Le Labo, La Mer, Clinique, Aveda, Tom Ford and Estee Lauder trademarks but were determined to be fakes, according to the suit, filed Monday.

The products include counterfeit versions of Estee Lauder’s Advanced Night Repair serum, a Le Labo fragrance, a Clinique eye cream, a La Mer lotion, an Aveda hair brush and a Tom Ford fragrance. 

xemplars of the Estée Lauder Accused Products

U.S. District Court Complaint

Advertisement

It’s unclear when Estee Lauder bought and tested the products but the suit comes several months after CNBC published an investigation into counterfeit beauty products and fraud on Walmart.com.

Two of the counterfeit products cited in CNBC’s investigation — Estee Lauder Advanced Night Repair serum and Clinique Smart Clinical Repair Wrinkle Correcting Eye Cream — were also mentioned in Estee Lauder’s lawsuit. It’s unclear if the products cited in the suit are the same counterfeits CNBC provided to Estee Lauder. 

Estee Lauder and Walmart didn’t immediately return requests for comment. 

Exemplars of the Clinique Accused Products

Advertisement

U.S. District Court Complaint

While the products were sold by third-party sellers on Walmart’s online marketplace, Estee Lauder said the company played an active role in facilitating those sales to shoppers in its suit. The legacy beauty company called Walmart’s conduct “extreme, outrageous, fraudulent … despicable and harmful.” 

The counterfeit products were promoted and advertised to shoppers on the platform, Estee Lauder’s trademarks were used in search engine optimization tools to drive traffic to the listings and Walmart profited from the sales, the complaint stated. 

Further, “a person shopping on Walmart.com would have reasonably believed that Walmart, and not third-party sellers, was the seller” of the item, which could have caused confusion among shoppers, the complaint states. 

Advertisement

At the heart of CNBC’s investigation into Walmart’s online marketplace was the steps the company took, or didn’t take, to vet its third-party sellers and the products they were offering to prevent fraud and the sale of fakes on the platform. 

Exemplars of the La Mer Accused Products.

U.S. District Court Complaint

In its complaint, Estee Lauder said Walmart promoted the “reputation and professionalism” of the sellers permitted to operate on the platform but said the retailer actually does “very little to ensure that only authorized and authentic products are available” for sale. 

Advertisement

“This is readily apparent given the [counterfeits] were permitted to be sold on Defendants’ website despite their stated careful selection process in who they choose as a Marketplace seller/partner,” the complaint states. “Accordingly, Defendants know or had reason to know that the sellers they partnered with and ‘regularly review[ed]’ were selling products which infringe upon the Estée Lauder Marks.” 

Walmart’s online marketplace has become a key part of its strategy to grow profit faster than sales and better compete against its longtime rival, Amazon. The rapid growth of the online platform helped fuel Walmart’s ascent to a $1 trillion market cap last week, putting it in an exclusive club made up almost entirely of technology companies. 

However, the strategy has come with risks, CNBC’s investigation revealed. Offering counterfeit, potentially dangerous, products to shoppers through third-party sellers on the marketplace opens Walmart up to liability and could erode the customer trust at the core of its brand.

Exemplars of the Le Labo Accused Products

Advertisement

U.S. District Court Complaint

Ever since a 2010 court ruling that arose after Tiffany sued eBay over counterfeit products on the platform, it can be tough for brands to hold platforms accountable for their role in selling counterfeit goods. Sometimes, they avoid lawsuits unless the conduct is extreme or particularly flagrant, experts previously told CNBC.

The Shop Safe Act, a bipartisan federal bill that aims to curb the sale of fakes on online marketplaces, is designed to address some of the issues posed by the Tiffany v. eBay ruling by incentivizing platforms to better vet sellers and the products they’re offering. When platforms comply with certain anti-counterfeiting measures, they could be shielded from liability if a seller offers a fake product. 

Brands widely supported the legislation, but it has so far failed to pass at least three times. That’s partially because Walmart and other online marketplaces like Amazon, Etsy and eBay have lobbied against aspects of it, two U.S. Senate aides, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the discussions were private, previously told CNBC. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Senior Co-op staff complain of ‘toxic’ culture at the top

Published

on

Senior Co-op staff complain of 'toxic' culture at the top

A spokesman for the Co-op told the BBC: “Our culture, as a co-operative, ensured decision-making throughout has listened to views from leaders and colleagues across our food and wider business, whilst simultaneously acknowledging when a wide range of views are expressed, not everybody will always agree with the final decisions and actions taken.”

Continue Reading

Business

HUDCO, NaBFID and SIDBI to tap bond market for Rs 13,500 cr

Published

on

HUDCO, NaBFID and SIDBI to tap bond market for Rs 13,500 cr
Mumbai: Public sector majors HUDCO, NaBFID and SIDBI are set to collectively raise ₹13,500 crore from the corporate bond market Wednesday through medium-to-long-term notes amid visible easing in wholesale bank lending rates.

Investor focus is likely to be on NaBFID’s planned ₹4,000 crore 10-year bond sale, which comes at a time when the benchmark 10-year benchmark government security is trading at 6.75%. Market participants expect the NaBFID paper to be priced at a spread of roughly 100 basis points over the sovereign yield.

One basis point is a hundredth of a percentage point.

HUDCO, NaBFID and SIDBI to tap bond market for Rs 13,500 cr
Advertisement

Three major public sector companies, HUDCO, NaBFID, and SIDBI, are set to raise a significant ₹13,500 crore from the corporate bond market. This move comes as wholesale bank lending rates show signs of easing. Investors will be closely watching NaBFID’s ₹4,000 crore bond sale. This borrowing activity highlights the companies’ strategy to tap into the bond market for funding.


“Pricing of these bonds is complicated because the 10 year g-sec yield is also quite high. I expect NaBFID to get rates below the state bond rate,” said Venkatakrishnan Srinivasan, managing partner at Rockfort Fincap, a debt advisory firm. “HUDCO, for a three-year tenure, should get a rate of around 7.75%-8%.”

HUDCO, NaBFID and SIDBI to Tap Bond Street for ₹13,500 crAgencies

“These attractive rates are available only for highly rated or public sector companies. But as bank loans are also providing competitive rates, issuers tapping the bond market have become more stringent on market borrowings,” Srinivasan said. Corporates raised ₹26,752 crores in January this year, versus ₹29,798 crores in December 2025, BSE data showed.


On the other hand, wholesale loans by banks climbed, with State Bank of India (SBI) seeing a 3.4% year-on-year rise in its ₹13.33 lakh crore corporate loan book for the quarter ended December.
HDFC Bank posted a 10.3% growth in its ₹7.7 lakh crore corporate loan book and ICICI Bank’s domestic corporate portfolio of about ₹3 lakh crore grew 5.6% year-on-year.

Continue Reading

Business

China’s Li inspects rare earth facilities, hints at leverage in US rivalry

Published

on

China’s Li inspects rare earth facilities, hints at leverage in US rivalry


China’s Li inspects rare earth facilities, hints at leverage in US rivalry

Continue Reading

Business

Freedom To Act: Europe Inc pushes plans to list in India

Published

on

Freedom To Act: Europe Inc pushes plans to list in India
Mumbai: As negotiations between Brussels and New Delhi over the EU-India trade agreement gather pace, a slew of European multinationals are increasingly exploring listing their Indian subsidiaries in Mumbai.

Investment bankers said they are already seeing a clear uptick in enquiries for initial public offerings (IPOs) from European industrial companies, particularly in auto components, speciality chemicals and clean energy, especially after the trade deal. More notably, the vibrant domestic fund-raising market – where multinational companies have been able to sell shares at eye-popping valuations in the last two years – is also encouraging them to explore domestic listings.

According to bankers, German auto components firm MAHLE GmbH and Swedish gaming company Modern Times Group, through its Indian mobile gaming subsidiary PlaySimple are preparing to file draft red herring prospectuses (DRHPs) with the market regulator for proposed IPOs soon. Danish brewer Carlsberg is also contemplating an IPO. Emails sent to the companies remained unanswered.

Freedom To Act: Europe Inc Pushes Plans to List in IndiaAgencies

Auto parts, specialty chem & clean energy cos among those keen to unlock value

This week, Italian giant Bonfiglioli Transmissions filed a DRHP for a ₹2,000 crore IPO. Last year, German Green Steel & Power received Sebi nod to go ahead with the IPO and will be launching its IPO soon. SAEL Industries, an Indian renewable energy firm backed by Norwegian state-run fund Norfund, filed papers in November 2025 for an ₹4,575 crore IPO.
“The emerging interest from European industrial, auto-component and clean-energy firms signals a deeper level of confidence in India’s regulatory architecture, disclosure standards and institutional investor base,” said Bhavesh Shah, managing director and head – Investment Banking, Equirus Capital. “It is the growing base of the domestic institutional investors that is triggering this trend.”

Advertisement


Shah said if the momentum in the IPO market sustains, India could evolve into a preferred regional hub for multinational listings.
Several mandates are believed to be at the pre-filing stage, with listings expected over the next 12 to 18 months. The pipeline, according to bankers, spans sectors from precision engineering and renewable energy equipment to consumer-facing brands with deep European heritage. “The conclusion of the India-EU Free Trade Agreement, has turned India’s capital markets into a strategic expansion route for European multinationals specifically for European automakers,” said Neha Agarwal, MD and head, Equity Capital Markets, JM Financial Institutional Securities.

“Following the successful listings of Orkla India and Carraro India, we are seeing a structural shift where European parents no longer view India just as a manufacturing hub, but as a primary destination to unlock equity value,” according to Agarwal.

“With firms like Bonfiglioli now in the pipeline, the FTA acts as the ultimate ‘confidence bridge’, allowing European giants to tap into India’s high-valuation premiums and capital to fund their global green ambitions.”

Not all are convinced the floodgates’re about to open. Dev Chandrasekhar, partner at Mumbai-based valuations and branding advisory firm Transcendum, expects listings by European firms in India to be “selective and opportunistic rather than a stampede”. “For European companies seeking to de-risk supply chains away from China while accessing a $4 trillion economy, an Indian listing may no longer be optional, but it may be inevitable… let’s not get ahead of ourselves because the EU-India deal is still being negotiated.”

Also, many European firms may be sceptical of listing here “European companies are notoriously cautious about the governance dilution that comes with a public listing in an emerging market,” said Chandrasekhar. “The regulatory environment has improved, but Sebi’s disclosure norms, related-party transaction scrutiny and promoter lock-in requirements can be uncomfortable for European sponsors used to lighter-touch regimes.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

CRAs need to maintain additional net worth: Sebi

Published

on

CRAs need to maintain additional net worth: Sebi
Mumbai: The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) on Tuesday said credit rating agencies (CRAs) should maintain additional net worth if they are undertaking rating of instruments falling under the purview of other financial sector regulators.

At present, Sebi rules mandate CRAs to have a minimum net worth of ₹25 crore, and to undertake credit ratings of only listed or proposed to be listed securities, or rating of financial instruments under the guidelines of a regulator as specified by Sebi.

Sebi has received representation from the industry on permitting rating agencies to undertake rating of financial products under the purview of other financial sector regulators (FSR), even where no rating related guidelines may have been issued by the relevant FSR.

These include the rating of unlisted securities.

Advertisement

“It has also been represented that since rating of said products/entities is adjacent to the current business of credit rating agencies, permitting the same may lead to significant synergies, while also addressing a gap in the industry,” Sebi had said earlier in its discussion paper.


Continue Reading

Business

‘Menacing’ Disney advert featuring severed body banned

Published

on

'Menacing' Disney advert featuring severed body banned

Disney subsidiary Twentieth Century Studios, which produced the film, said it was rated 12A, and the advertisement had been designed with that in mind. The company argued the brief and stylised nature of the scene meant the alien character or other imagery used would be unlikely to cause harm or offence.

Continue Reading

Business

AstraZeneca profits surge 40% on strong demand for cancer treatments

Published

on

Business Live

FTSE 100 drugs giant reports pre-tax profits of $12.4bn for 2025, driven by cancer drug sales

The AstraZeneca factory in Speke, Liverpool

The AstraZeneca factory in Speke, south Liverpool(Image: PAUL ELLIS/AFP via Getty Images)

Pharmaceutical heavyweight AstraZeneca has recorded a 40% leap in annual profits and forecasted continued earnings growth over the coming year, banking on robust demand for its cancer medicines.

Advertisement

The FTSE 100 company posted pre-tax profits of 12.4 billion US dollars (£9.06 billion) for 2025, climbing from 8.69 billion dollars (£6.35 billion) in 2024, propelled by a 49% surge in the fourth quarter on a constant currency basis.

Operating profits rose 36% on a constant currency basis to 13.74 billion dollars (£10.04 billion), whilst revenues increased 8% with currency fluctuations excluded, reaching 58.74 billion dollars (£42.93 billion).

The company indicated that revenues are projected to climb by a “mid-to-high single-digit percentage” in 2026, whilst underlying earnings per share are anticipated to grow by a low double-digit percentage.

The Anglo-Swedish pharmaceutical group is wagering on sustained strong appetite for its oncology treatments, whilst simultaneously expanding further into the US and Chinese markets and investing in increasingly sought-after weight-loss therapies.

Advertisement

These strategic moves are intended to help cushion the blow from losing patent protection on Farxiga, its blockbuster diabetes medication.

Farxiga’s sales growth registered a modest 2% on a constant currency basis during the fourth quarter.

Chief executive Pascal Soriot reaffirmed targets of achieving 80 billion dollars (£58.47 billion) in annual sales by 2030 through new medicines and strategic investments, with the company poised to announce results from as many as 20 advanced clinical trials this year. He stated that the “momentum across our company is continuing in 2026”.

“We have more than 100 Phase 3 studies ongoing, including a substantial and growing number of trials of our transformative technologies which have the potential to revolutionise outcomes for patients and drive our growth well beyond 2030,” Mr Soriot added.

Advertisement

Recently, the group announced an £13.52 billion ($18.5 billion) partnership with China’s CSPC Pharmaceutical Group to accelerate the development of experimental weight loss and diabetes drugs.

This move allows AstraZeneca to increase its investment in the rapidly expanding market for weight loss and diabetes drugs, previously dominated by blockbuster brands Mounjaro, Ozempic and Wegovy.

The annual results were released after AstraZeneca began trading shares on the NYSE earlier this month, while maintaining its listings on the London Stock Exchange and Nasdaq Stockholm.

AstraZeneca, which has key UK bases in Macclesfield and Cambridge, generates nearly half of its revenues in the US and aims to further expand in the world’s largest drugs market.

Advertisement

Last July, the company announced plans for around £36.55 billion ($50 billion) investment in the company by 2030, while several joint ventures in China are targeting the world’s second largest economy.

Shares in AstraZeneca rose 1% in Tuesday morning trading, with the stock having increased 28% over the past six months.

Chris Beauchamp, chief market analyst at IG, commented: “The numbers this morning continue to show how AstraZeneca seems to have its house in order when it comes to its drug pipeline.”

He further added: “The outlook and recent performance more than justifies the recent surge in the share price which has finally seen it break higher after years of sideways trading.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

BiomX Inc. deconsolidates Israeli subsidiary after insolvency proceedings

Published

on


BiomX Inc. deconsolidates Israeli subsidiary after insolvency proceedings

Continue Reading

Business

Impax Global Social Leaders Fund Q4 2025 Commentary (Mutual Fund:IGSLX)

Published

on

Impax Global Social Leaders Fund Q4 2025 Commentary (Mutual Fund:IGSLX)

Founded in 1998, Impax is a specialist asset manager investing in the opportunities arising from the transition to a more sustainable global economy. Impax believes that capital markets will be shaped profoundly by global sustainability challenges, including climate change, pollution and essential investments in human capital, infrastructure and resource efficiency. These trends will drive growth for well-positioned companies and create risks for those unable or unwilling to adapt. Impax offers a well-rounded suite of investment solutions spanning multiple asset classes seeking strong risk-adjusted returns over the medium to long term. Impax manages funds and accounts in five areas: actively managed long-only equity, fixed income, systematic equities, multi asset, and new energy infrastructure. Impax has offices in the United Kingdom, the United States, Ireland, Denmark, Hong Kong and Japan, approximately £36.9 billion in assets under management and has one of the investment management sector’s largest investment teams dedicated to sustainable development. Note: This account is not managed or monitored by Impax, and any messages sent via Seeking Alpha will not receive a response. For inquiries or communication, please use Impax’s official channels.

Continue Reading

Business

Moderna says FDA refuses to review application for flu shot

Published

on

Moderna says FDA refuses to review application for flu shot

A researcher works in the lab at the Moderna Inc. headquarters in Cambridge, Massachusetts, US, on Tuesday, March 26, 2024.

Adam Glanzman | Bloomberg | Getty Images

The Food and Drug Administration has refused to start a review of Moderna‘s application for its experimental flu shot, the company announced Tuesday, in another sign of the Trump administration’s influence on tightening vaccine regulations in the U.S. 

Advertisement

The company’s stock fell roughly 7% in after-hours trading Tuesday.

Moderna said the move is inconsistent with previous feedback from the agency from before it submitted the application and started phase three trials on the shot, called mRNA-1010. The drugmaker said it has requested a meeting with the FDA to “understand the path forward.” 

Moderna noted that the agency did not identify any specific safety or efficacy issues with the vaccine, but instead objected to the study design, despite previously approving it. The company added that the move won’t impact its 2026 financial guidance.

Moderna’s jab showed positive phase three data last year, meeting all of the trial goals. At the time, Moderna said the stand-alone flu shot was key to its efforts to advance a combination vaccine targeting both influenza and Covid-19.

Advertisement

The announcement follows sweeping changes to U.S. immunization policy over the past year under Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a prominent vaccine skeptic. 

Moderna on Tuesday specifically pointed to the FDA’s top vaccine regulator, Vinay Prasad, who returned to the agency in August after being ousted. Prasad, who heads the agency’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, or CBER, has been vocal about tightening regulations for vaccines and recently linked child deaths to Covid shots. 

In a letter signed by Prasad on Feb. 3, he said the sole reason why the FDA refused to review the application was because of how the clinical trial on the shot was designed.

The agency specifically took issue with Moderna’s decision to compare its product to a standard, approved flu shot, arguing that it “does not reflect the best-available standard of care.” As a result, the FDA said the study did not meet its definition of an “adequate and well-controlled” trial.

Advertisement

Moderna disputes that reasoning, noting that FDA rules and guidance do not actually require trials to use the most advanced or highest-dose vaccine as a comparator in clinical studies. 

“This decision by CBER, which did not identify any safety or efficacy concerns with our product, does not further our shared goal of enhancing America’s leadership in developing innovative medicines,” Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel said in a release. “It should not be controversial to conduct a comprehensive review of a flu vaccine submission that uses an FDA-approved vaccine as a comparator in a study that was discussed and agreed on with CBER prior to starting.”

Moderna said it expects the earliest approval for its flu shot to be in late 2026 or late 2027, pending regulatory reviews in the U.S., Europe, Canada and Australia.

The FDA said it does not comment on regulatory communications to individual sponsors.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025