Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Business

F&O Talk | Nifty grapples with dead cat bounce syndrome as pullbacks get sold. Sudeep Shah on Olectra, IDBI, 4 more stocks

Published

on

F&O Talk | Nifty grapples with dead cat bounce syndrome as pullbacks get sold. Sudeep Shah on Olectra, IDBI, 4 more stocks
Domestic frontline indices ended with gains on Friday, led by strong action in IT, auto and metal stocks though weakness in banks and financials capped the gains. The broader Nifty rose 112.35 points, or 0.49%, to close at 23,114.50, while the 30-share Sensex gained 325.72 points, or 0.44%, to settle at 74,532.96.

Global cues remain negative with the Iran-Israel war entering the fourth week. The energy prices remain elevated with Brent hovering near the $113 a barrel mark. For domestic markets, persistent FII outflows and rupee weakness remain a growing concern.

Fear index India settled at 22.81 on the NSE in the last session, mildly up by 0.04%.

Analyst Sudeep Shah, Vice President and Head of Technical & Derivatives Research at SBI Securities, interacted with ETMarkets regarding the outlook for the Nifty and Bank Nifty, as well as an index strategy for the upcoming week. The following are the edited excerpts from his chat:

Advertisement

Q: Nifty ended mildly negative at 0.2% WoW, narrowing its losses through Friday gains as the bull started emphatically but lost momentum towards the end. Was it short covering or do you see the trend continuing next week as well?

Markets have little tolerance for uncertainty—and the ongoing escalation in West Asia since February 28 has kept risk appetite firmly in check. Since the onset of the conflict, the Nifty has corrected sharply by over 2000 points, reflecting the sustained pressure from global cues and risk-off sentiment.
The price action during this phase has been telling. The index has witnessed three distinct dead cat bounces, each met with aggressive selling at higher levels—clearly underscoring the firm grip of bears on the market. Every pullback has been sold into, highlighting a lack of conviction among buyers. While Nifty managed to end the current week on a flat note, the underlying weakness continues to persist.
Volatility remained elevated throughout the week. The index staged a sharp recovery of nearly 900 points in the first three trading sessions, only to see all gains completely erased on Thursday-marking the sharpest single-day decline since June 4, 2024. Ultimately, Nifty ended the week on a muted note, extending its losing streak to four consecutive weeks.
Sectorally, the pain has been most visible in Automobile and Banking stocks, which were the key outperformers prior to the conflict. These sectors have borne the brunt of selling pressure, largely driven by sustained FII outflows, with foreign investors offloading a massive ₹81262 crore in the ongoing March series. Given their heavy exposure to these sectors, FII selling has amplified the downside momentum.

A major overhang for the markets has been the sharp surge in crude oil prices. Brent crude once again spiked to $114.3 per barrel during the week before witnessing a marginal cooling off. Simultaneously, concerns around gas shortages and supply disruptions have intensified, with key energy commodities witnessing steep price increases since the start of the conflict. Elevated energy prices continue to pose a risk to inflation dynamics and corporate margins, thereby weighing on equity markets.

From a technical standpoint, the trend remains decisively negative. The index is currently trading below its all the crucial moving averages, and the formation of a bearish candlestick with a long upper shadow indicates persistent selling pressure at higher levels. Adding to the caution, the weekly RSI has slipped to 30.22, marking its lowest level since the COVID-led market correction—signalling deeply oversold conditions, yet without a clear reversal trigger.

Advertisement

Q: What levels will be important for Nifty this week and how should one trade?

For Nifty, the 22,850–22,800 zone will act as immediate support. A sustained breach below this level could accelerate the decline towards 22,500. On the upside, the 23,420–23,460 zone is likely to act as a stiff resistance, with any pullback expected to face selling pressure in this band.

Q: Market’s lackluster performance can be attributed to Nifty Bank, which has delivered its third worst performance in March in the past 20 years, declining by nearly 11%. What do Bank Nifty charts suggest and how to trade?

For the fourth consecutive week, the banking benchmark index Bank Nifty ended on a negative note, underscoring sustained weakness and persistent selling pressure in the banking space. Most notably, on the weekly chart, the index has formed a small-bodied candle with a long upper shadow, which clearly reflects selling pressure emerging at higher levels and a failure to sustain intraday and weekly recoveries.

Furthermore, for the second straight week, Bank Nifty has closed below its 100-week EMA, which is a crucial long-term trend indicator and reinforces the bearish undertone. On the daily timeframe, the index continues to remain under pressure, as it has been trading consistently below its 200-day EMA for the past ten trading sessions. This prolonged stay below the long-term moving average highlights a loss of medium-term trend strength and indicates that rallies are being sold into.

Momentum indicators also remain firmly biased towards the downside. Both the daily and weekly RSI are placed in bearish territory and are sloping downward, suggesting weakening momentum and limited scope for any meaningful upside in the near term.

Advertisement

Going forward, the zone of 54,300–54,400 is expected to act as a key resistance area for the index. As long as Bank Nifty trades below the 54400 mark, the broader outlook is likely to remain negative. In such a scenario, the index may continue its downward trajectory and test the immediate support near 52,200, followed by the next important support around 51500 in the

Q: Auto sector is another top loser and its prospects are tied to oil prices and inflation. In light of the Iran-Israel war, do you expect more correction, or is a bottom visible?

Nifty Auto staged a strong rebound in line with the broader market, bouncing from the 24,230–23,850 zone, a region that had previously acted as strong resistance during June–August 2025. However, the pullback proved short-lived as the index encountered stiff resistance near the 25,700–25,750 zone and eventually closed lower.

Notably, after facing rejection around the 28,720–28,820 zone between February 11–26, 2026, the index has corrected nearly 14%, confirming a double-top neckline breakdown in the process.

Technically, the index continues to trade below its key short and long-term moving averages, indicating a weak underlying trend. Momentum indicators also remain bearish. The RSI has failed to sustain above the 40 mark despite multiple attempts, while the MACD remains below both the zero line and the signal line. Additionally, a rising ADX suggests strengthening bearish momentum.

Advertisement

Going ahead, the 25,200–25,300 zone is likely to act as a crucial resistance. As long as the index remains below this level, the broader trend is expected to stay negative. On the downside, the 24,200–24,100 zone serves as a key support, and a decisive breach below this range could trigger further downside in the index

Q: Fed has left policy rates unchanged and has indicated a single rate cut of 25 bps this year. This comes as a blow to the tech sector which is already reeling under the AI threat. What is your take on the sector and any preferred stock to buy?


Since peaking at 40,301 on 3rd February, the Nifty IT Index has corrected sharply by nearly 28%, reflecting a combination of global macro headwinds and a deeper structural concern around AI disruption.

While a stronger dollar typically acts as a tailwind for IT companies due to higher export realizations, this time the benefit has been overshadowed. The core issue lies in the growing perception that AI poses a fundamental threat to traditional IT services, especially in areas like low-end coding, maintenance, and repetitive back-office functions. Markets have been quick to price in this risk, leading to sustained selling pressure.

Advertisement

That said, it’s important to note that leading IT companies are not standing still. Firms like Tata Consultancy Services, Infosys, and HCLTech have been actively investing in AI capabilities, building proprietary platforms, and integrating AI-led solutions into their service offerings. However, this transition is gradual in nature, the benefits are unlikely to reflect immediately in earnings and may take a few quarters to materialize meaningfully.

From a technical standpoint, the setup remains weak. The index continues to trade below its key short- and long-term moving averages, indicating a sustained downtrend. The MACD line remains well below both the signal line and the zero line, reinforcing bearish momentum. Although the pace of decline has moderated recently, there are still no clear signs of base formation or trend reversal.

Given this backdrop, it would be prudent to avoid bottom fishing at this stage. A more sensible approach would be to wait for signs of stabilization, such as sustained price strength, improving momentum indicators, or evidence of earnings resilience driven by AI adoption, before considering fresh exposure to the sector.

Advertisement

Q: India VIX is up 68% in a month and volatility is expected to remain high going ahead. How should one navigate this phase?


With India VIX surging 68% in a month, investors should prioritize capital protection. Focus on disciplined position sizing, avoid aggressive leverage, and stick to high-quality stocks. Use rallies to reduce risk, maintain higher cash levels, and wait for volatility to cool before taking directional bets.

Q: Olectra, JBM Auto and Jai Prakash Power Ventures were big gainers this week, while Chennai IDBI Bank, Bandhan Bank and BPCL have been big losers. What should investors do with them?


Olectra Greentech

The stock has witnessed a strong rebound from the lows of 865. However, it remains in a broader downtrend since October 2025, and it is still premature to classify the current move as a trend reversal. For any meaningful upside traction, the stock needs to sustain above the 980–975 zone.

Advertisement

JBM Auto

The stock rebounded sharply from its key support zone of 490–470 earlier this week. That said, it continues to face resistance near its previous swing high of 615–620. Unless this zone is decisively breached, the current pullback cannot be considered a confirmed trend reversal.

Jaiprakash Power Ventures

The stock has delivered a downward-sloping trendline breakout on the daily chart, supported by a rise in volumes. Momentum indicators are turning constructive. RSI is trending higher, and the DI+ is comfortably above DI- on the ADX, indicating bullish undertones. The stock needs to hold above the 14.5–14 zone to sustain the move. However, being a penny stock, it warrants a cautious approach.

Advertisement

IDBI Bank

The stock witnessed a sharp gap-down of nearly 17% on 16th March and has continued to drift lower since then. RSI remains weak at around 25, highlighting persistent bearish momentum. As long as the stock trades below the 80–82 zone, the broader trend is likely to remain negative.

Bandhan Bank

The stock has corrected nearly 17% from its recent high of 190 recorded on 26th February. It continues to trade below key moving averages, while the MACD remains below both the zero line and signal line, indicating sustained weakness. The trend is likely to stay bearish as long as the price remains below 165–167.

Advertisement

BPCL

The stock Bharat Petroleum Corporation slipped below its 200-day EMA on 9th March and has been under pressure since. It has corrected nearly 26% from its high of 390 on 27th February. A rising ADX points to strengthening bearish momentum. As long as the stock trades below the 307–310 zone, the overall trend is expected to remain weak.

(Disclaimer: The recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times.)

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

CK Asset Holdings Limited (CHKGF) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Published

on

OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Lai Chee Ma
General Manager of Corporate Business Development Department

Good afternoon. Welcome to the CK Asset Holdings Limited 2025 Annual Results Analyst Presentation. My name is Gerald. On my right are two of my fellow ExCo members, Simon Man and Yue Seng Chiu. Our Chairman, Mr. Victor Li, will join us shortly for the Q&A session after the presentation.

So we’ll quickly go into it, 2025 results highlights. Revenue came to HKD 85.85 billion, up 19.9%. Profit before investment property revaluation, HKD 11.96 billion or HKD 3.42, up 2.7%. We recorded an IP revaluation deficit of HKD 1.11 billion last year or HKD 0.32, leading to a profit attributable to shareholders of HKD 10.85 billion or HKD 3.10, down 20.3%. We declared a final dividend of HKD 1.39, making full year dividend HKD 1.78. Dividend per share, hence up 2.3% over last year. Net book value per share also has risen by 2.3% to HKD 113.28.

Turning to our principal activities. 76% of our revenue and 85% of our profit contribution are now recurring in nature. By geography, 31% of contribution from Hong Kong, 11% from the Mainland and 58% from overseas, making us a very different company compared to other property companies in Hong Kong.

Advertisement

Looking at divisional performances, property sales. So we recorded much stronger sales recognition this year — last year, but margins were low due to provisions for properties for sale. Revenue came to HKD 20.45 billion, up 105.3%. Profit contribution after provisions at HKD 2.7 billion, up 24%. Overall margin post provision was 13.4%.

Continue Reading

Business

Super Micro: Another Perfect Storm

Published

on

Palantir: AI SaaS Winner Still Expensive - Bull Trap Plays Out

Super Micro: Another Perfect Storm

Continue Reading

Business

Elon Musk Liable in Twitter Shareholder Fraud Case as Jury Finds He Misled Investors Before $44 Billion Buyout

Published

on

Elon Musk has clashed before with US securities regulators keen to find out why he didn't let them know sooner about increasing his stake in Twitter ahead of moving to buy the global online platform.

SAN FRANCISCO — A federal jury in San Francisco found Elon Musk liable Friday, March 20, 2026, for misleading Twitter shareholders by deliberately driving down the company’s stock price in the months leading up to his $44 billion acquisition in 2022, though it absolved him of broader fraud claims including an intentional scheme to defraud.

Elon Musk has clashed before with US securities regulators keen to find out why he didn't let them know sooner about increasing his stake in Twitter ahead of moving to buy the global online platform.

The nine-person jury deliberated for three days after a three-week trial that featured Musk’s in-person testimony earlier in March. Jurors concluded that two specific tweets from May 2022 — including one claiming the Twitter deal was “temporarily on hold” — contained false statements that caused a plunge in Twitter’s share price, harming investors who sold based on those statements. The jury cleared Musk on other allegations, such as podcast comments and a wider conspiracy to mislead.

The verdict in the class-action securities lawsuit could expose Musk — the world’s richest person with a net worth near $850 billion — to damages potentially in the billions, though the exact amount will be determined in a separate phase. Plaintiffs sought up to $2.6 billion in some calculations. Musk’s legal team vowed to appeal, calling the decision disappointing but limited in scope.

The ruling caps a years-long saga stemming from Musk’s chaotic 2022 pursuit of Twitter (now X), which began with a $44 billion offer, included attempts to back out over bot concerns, and ended with a forced completion under court pressure. Musk has long maintained his statements were protected speech or accurate reflections of due diligence issues, particularly fake accounts.

On X Saturday, Musk posted lightly amid the fallout, offering to cover TSA salaries during a hypothetical funding impasse and engaging in unrelated banter about physics, AI and Grok. He made no direct comment on the verdict in visible recent posts.

Advertisement

The decision comes amid other major developments in Musk’s empire. SpaceX, his rocket company, is advancing confidential IPO preparations, with filings potentially as early as March and a mid-2026 listing targeting a valuation exceeding $1.75 trillion — potentially the largest ever. Starlink, its satellite internet arm, drives most revenue, while February’s merger with Musk’s xAI (valuing the combined entity at $1.25 trillion) integrates Grok AI, orbital data centers and compute resources for massive-scale artificial intelligence.

Tesla, meanwhile, pushes aggressive timelines for robotaxi rollout. Musk stated Thursday that driverless services will become “very, very widespread” across the U.S. by year’s end, expanding from pilot cities to Dallas, Houston, Phoenix, Miami, Orlando, Tampa and Las Vegas in the first half of 2026. He tempered expectations on Cybercab and Optimus humanoid robot production, calling early rates “agonizingly slow” before eventual rapid scaling.

Tesla converted its $2 billion xAI investment into a SpaceX stake following the merger, formalizing ties among Musk’s companies ahead of potential SpaceX public debut. Musk has described orbital AI infrastructure as the path to unlimited compute powered by solar energy in space, predicting 2026 as a pivotal year for the “singularity” — where machine and human intelligence converge.

Neuralink continues human trials for brain-computer interfaces, with plans for high-volume production and automated implantation in 2026. Musk’s political involvement persists, including past support for Republican causes and commentary on government efficiency via DOGE initiatives.

Advertisement

The Twitter verdict adds legal pressure as Musk juggles Tesla’s autonomy push, SpaceX’s IPO ambitions and xAI’s rapid growth. While the ruling is civil and not criminal, it could impact investor confidence in Musk-led ventures and fuel ongoing scrutiny of his public statements on X.

As Musk navigates these crosscurrents, his influence spans transportation, space, AI and policy. The jury’s finding — that he misled investors in a landmark deal — marks a significant setback in his storied business career, even as his companies race toward transformative milestones in 2026.

Continue Reading

Business

Central Bank Policy On Hold As Markets Weigh Energy Risks

Published

on

Central Bank Policy On Hold As Markets Weigh Energy Risks

Low angle view of skyscrapers in London banking district

Gary Yeowell/DigitalVision via Getty Images

By BeiChen Lin, CFA, CPA, Director, Head of Canadian Strategy

Energy volatility persists

Geopolitical developments in the Middle East drove market attention this week, with reports of energy infrastructure being targeted leading to sharp

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Explained: Why gold prices remain subdued despite West Asia tensions

Published

on

Explained: Why gold prices remain subdued despite West Asia tensions
Gold prices have remained unexpectedly weak even as geopolitical tensions in West Asia intensify—a stark contrast to gold’s traditional reputation as a safe-haven asset during global crises. Since 01 March, international gold prices have dropped nearly 13%, while domestic prices in India have fallen about 10%. Silver has corrected even more sharply, with global prices down 25% and domestic prices lower by 21%. This unusual divergence between rising geopolitical risk and falling precious metal prices highlights deeper macroeconomic forces at play. It also raises the question: Is this merely a short-term consolidation, or does it signal a structural shift in investor behaviour?

Strong U.S. Dollar Limits Safe-Haven Gains

One of the biggest factors suppressing gold is the renewed strength of the U.S. dollar. During periods of geopolitical stress, global investors flock not only to gold but also to the dollar, which offers superior liquidity and global acceptance.

The U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) has risen sharply from around 97 in mid-February to 100.15 by mid-March, reflecting strong safe-haven flows into the greenback. Since gold is dollar-priced, a stronger USD makes bullion costlier for other currency holders, dampening investment and physical demand. As a result, the usual geopolitical boost for gold has been overshadowed by the dollar’s resurgence.

Rising U.S. Treasury Yields and Higher Oil Prices Pressure Bullion

Gold has also faced pressure from rising U.S. Treasury yields. Higher yields increase the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets like gold, making government bonds more attractive in comparison. At the same time, surging oil prices amid the Iran–Middle East conflict have intensified inflation worries. Investors now expect central banks, especially the U.S. Federal Reserve, to keep interest rates elevated for longer. This environment strengthens yield-bearing assets and weakens gold’s appeal, even during geopolitical upheavals.

Advertisement

Overvaluation and Heavy Profit-Taking

Gold had already staged a robust rally before the West Asia conflict erupted. After such a steep climb, the metal entered what many considered overvalued territory. Investors were reluctant to increase their exposure at elevated levels. When volatility spiked after the conflict intensified, traders seized the opportunity to book profits, leading to liquidation pressure instead of the typical safe-haven inflows. Markets tend to react this way after extended rallies, where investors prefer locking in gains rather than adding fresh positions. This wave of profit-taking diluted the potential upside from geopolitical tensions.

Liquidity-Driven Selling and Geopolitical Risk Already Priced In

During periods of sharp market stress, investors often prioritise liquidity above all else. Gold, being one of the most liquid assets globally, frequently becomes a source of cash to cover losses, meet margin calls, or rebalance portfolios. This liquidity-driven selling has been a key factor in the recent correction, overpowering safe-haven demand. Additionally, much of the geopolitical premium was already factored in gold prices at the start of 2026. Earlier conflicts, global recession fears, and currency volatility had kept gold elevated. With markets already positioned for ongoing instability and upcoming U.S. political developments, fresh upside triggers were limited.

Shift in Interest Rate Expectations and Overbought Technicals

Expectations around future U.S. interest rates have also influenced gold’s trajectory. Speculation surrounding potential changes in Federal Reserve leadership and delays in rate cuts have kept real yields high, reducing gold’s relative attractiveness.

On the technical front, both gold and silver were significantly overbought, which was reflected in elevated RSI readings. This indicated stretched speculative positioning and increased vulnerability to corrections. Traders took advantage of these technical signals to unwind bullish positions, adding to the downside pressure.

Advertisement

Why Indian Gold Prices Stayed Steady Despite a Weak Rupee

Despite the Indian rupee weakening to record lows, an event that typically pushes domestic gold prices higher by increasing import costs, gold prices in India have remained relatively steady. This unusual trend is largely due to the sharp decline in international gold prices, which has offset the higher landed cost caused by currency depreciation. At the same time, domestic demand has been subdued, as months of elevated prices have dampened jewellery buying and kept household budgets under pressure. Importers have also adopted a cautious stance, avoiding aggressive purchases amid volatile global conditions. These factors have prevented domestic prices from rising in proportion to the rupee’s weakness.

Outlook: Choppy Near Term, Constructive Long Term

Looking ahead, bullion is expected to remain choppy in the near term, with strong U.S. dollar conditions, elevated real yields, and uncertainty surrounding the Federal Reserve’s policy outlook likely to dominate price movement. Periodic bouts of liquidity-driven selling may add to short-term volatility, keeping gold and silver rangebound. However, the long-term outlook for precious metals remains constructive.

Persistent geopolitical fragmentation, ongoing central bank diversification away from major reserve currencies, underlying inflation risks, and tightening supply, particularly in silver, continue to support a favourable multi-year outlook for precious metals. As global growth moderates and monetary authorities eventually shift toward easing cycles, both gold and silver are poised to strengthen their roles as strategic hedges. With structural demand remaining firm and supply constraints becoming more pronounced, the long-term upside potential for both metals appears increasingly compelling.

(The author of the article is Hareesh V, Head of Commodity Research, Geojit Investments Limited)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Expert Calls for ‘No-Body Homicide’ Approach as Search Continues

Published

on

Wordle puzzle

TUCSON, Ariz. — The search for Nancy Guthrie, the 84-year-old mother of NBC *Today* show co-host Savannah Guthrie, entered its seventh week on March 21, 2026, with no confirmed breakthroughs, no arrests and growing calls from experts to treat the case as a potential “no-body homicide” amid persistent uncertainty about her fate.

Nancy Guthrie & Savannah Guthrie
Nancy Guthrie & Savannah Guthrie

Guthrie was last seen at her home in the affluent Catalina Foothills neighborhood of Tucson on the evening of January 31, 2026. She was reported missing the following day after failing to appear for a scheduled virtual church service. Authorities believe she was abducted from her residence against her will, citing drops of her blood found on the front porch and signs of a struggle.

Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos has described the disappearance as a targeted abduction, telling NBC News last week that investigators believe they know the motive but withheld details to protect the probe’s integrity. He warned residents to remain vigilant, stating the suspect could “absolutely” strike again. The sheriff has faced criticism over early handling, including releasing the home to family too soon — allowing media access to photograph blood evidence — and delays in securing neighbor security footage.

The FBI joined the investigation shortly after the report, amassing thousands of hours of video from doorbell cameras, traffic systems and private residences. Recent releases included footage of an “armed individual” tampering with Guthrie’s doorbell camera, plus images of a masked person believed to have visited the home prior to January 31. FBI agents returned to the neighborhood on March 18 — day 46 of the search — speaking with residents and reviewing additional footage, per law enforcement sources.

Multiple ransom notes have surfaced, some delivered to media outlets like TMZ, demanding payment for her safe return. The family, including Savannah Guthrie, offered a $1 million reward in late February for information leading to her recovery, supplementing the FBI’s $100,000. The private reward generated a surge of tips — more than 1,500 in the first month — though no credible leads have publicly resulted in her location.

Advertisement

Savannah Guthrie has issued repeated emotional pleas on social media and the *Today* show, urging anyone with information to come forward anonymously. In a February 27 Instagram post, she emphasized, “Please — be the one that brings her home,” attached to a segment highlighting the case. She returned to the show set in early March for off-camera meetings but has kept public appearances limited.

Experts remain divided on the case’s trajectory. Cybersecurity and law enforcement analyst Morgan Wright told NewsNation that the abduction appears targeted rather than random, suggesting the motive may involve personal or financial reasons rather than a burglary gone wrong. He urged authorities to shift toward treating it as a “no-body homicide,” acknowledging hopes for her safe return but preparing for the possibility she is no longer alive. Wright pointed to the lack of sightings, vehicle evidence or confirmed ransom fulfillment as red flags.

Former FBI special agent Harry Trombitas told Yahoo News the search will likely persist “as long as there is an investigation to conduct,” with resources shifting to evidence consolidation rather than broad outreach. Attorney Peter Christiansen described the probe entering a “new stage” focused on clinical analysis of DNA, video and forensics.

DNA evidence includes a glove found near the home matching one worn by the doorbell camera suspect; testing traced it to a restaurant worker, though no direct link to the abduction has been confirmed. A backpack and other items have been examined, but no public breakthroughs emerged. The FBI has focused on specific dates — January 11 and January 24 — seeking additional video from those periods.

Advertisement

The case has drawn international attention due to Savannah Guthrie’s prominence, prompting discussions on elder safety, family check-in protocols and the trauma of prolonged uncertainty for loved ones. Mental health experts note the emotional toll on families in missing-persons cases deepens with time, especially when hope persists alongside grim possibilities.

As of March 21, 2026, Nancy Guthrie’s condition and whereabouts remain unknown. Authorities continue urging tips via the Pima County Sheriff’s tip line or FBI channels, with anonymity assured and cash rewards available. The investigation, involving local detectives and federal resources, shows no signs of slowing despite the passage of weeks and mounting questions.

For the Guthrie family and community, the wait continues amid prayers and vigils. Savannah Guthrie’s public appeals underscore the enduring hope that information will surface to bring her mother home.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

OpenAI to nearly double workforce to 8,000 by end-2026, FT reports

Published

on

OpenAI to nearly double workforce to 8,000 by end-2026, FT reports


OpenAI to nearly double workforce to 8,000 by end-2026, FT reports

Continue Reading

Business

Japan Claims AFC Women’s Asian Cup Title Victory Over Hosts Australia

Published

on

Japan 1-0 Matildas

SYDNEY — Japan edged hosts Australia 1-0 in the AFC Women’s Asian Cup final on Saturday, March 21, 2026, securing their third continental crown and denying the Matildas a home triumph in front of a record crowd at Stadium Australia.

Japan 1-0 Matildas
Japan 1-0 Matildas

Maika Hamano’s 17th-minute goal proved decisive in the tightly contested match, as Nadeshiko Japan defended resiliently to hold off late pressure from the Matildas. The result marked Japan’s second consecutive Asian Cup title — their first back-to-back wins since the 2014 and 2018 editions — and extended their dominance in the tournament, where they have now won three of the last five finals against Australia.

A crowd of 74,397 — the largest ever for a women’s football match in Australia — packed Stadium Australia, creating an electric atmosphere despite the heartbreak for the home side. South Korean referee Kim Yu-jeong officiated the high-stakes clash, which qualified both finalists for the 2027 FIFA Women’s World Cup co-hosted by Brazil, with additional World Cup berths awarded to semifinalists.

Japan, ranked No. 1 in the world by FIFA entering the tournament, entered as favorites after dismantling South Korea 4-1 in the semifinals. Riko Ueki led the Golden Boot race with six goals, though Hamano’s clinical finish in the final stole the headlines. The midfielder latched onto a precise through ball, evading defenders before slotting past goalkeeper Jada Mathyssen-Whyman.

Australia, coached by Joe Montemurro, fought valiantly but struggled to convert chances. Captain Sam Kerr, who scored crucial goals en route to the final including the winner against China in the semifinals, tested Japan’s backline repeatedly but found no breakthrough. The Matildas’ campaign ended in familiar disappointment against Japan, echoing defeats in the 2014 and 2018 finals — both also 1-0 losses.

Advertisement

Japan coach Futoshi Ikeda praised his team’s composure under pressure. “We knew Australia would come hard, especially at home,” he said post-match. “Our focus on possession and quick transitions paid off. This victory is for every Japanese player who has built this legacy.”

Montemurro acknowledged the gap but highlighted progress. “Japan are the benchmark right now,” he told reporters. “We created opportunities but couldn’t finish. The crowd was incredible, and we’ll use this as fuel for the World Cup.”

The tournament, hosted across Sydney, Perth and other venues from March 1-21, set attendance records and showcased Asia’s rising talent. Japan topped Group C unbeaten, scoring 17 goals without conceding, while Australia navigated a tough Group A as runners-up before surging through knockouts with wins over DPR Korea and China.

Advertisement

Key moments included Japan’s clinical semifinal display against South Korea, where Ueki, Hamano and Saki Kumagai scored, and Australia’s gritty 2-1 semifinal victory over China, powered by Kerr’s late strike. The final lived up to hype as a clash of styles: Japan’s technical precision against Australia’s physicality and set-piece threat.

Japan’s triumph extends their regional supremacy, with three titles in the last decade. The win also boosts confidence ahead of the 2027 World Cup, where they aim to improve on their 2011 world championship.

For Australia, the loss stings but highlights growth. The Matildas, world No. 4, drew massive local support and advanced deeper than expected despite pre-tournament injury concerns. Kerr’s form and emerging talents like Courtney Nevin signal promise for future campaigns.

The match capped a successful tournament for the AFC, with strong crowds, competitive play and increased global visibility for women’s football in Asia. Japan lift the trophy as deserving champions, while Australia reflect on a valiant effort that fell just short.

Advertisement

As celebrations echoed in Sydney, Nadeshiko Japan began preparations for their next challenge, carrying continental pride into the global spotlight.

Continue Reading

Business

HYMB: Solid High-Yield Muni Bond ETF, Above-Average Tax-Advantaged Income (NYSEARCA:HYMB)

Published

on

HYMB: Solid High-Yield Muni Bond ETF, Above-Average Tax-Advantaged Income (NYSEARCA:HYMB)

This article was written by

Juan de la Hoz has worked as a fixed income trader, financial analyst, operations analyst, and as an economics professor. He has experience analyzing, trading, and negotiating fixed-income securities, including bonds, money markets, and interbank trade financing, across markets and currencies. He focuses on dividend, bond, and income funds, with a strong focus on ETFs. Juan is a contributor to the investing group CEF/ETF Income Laboratory which is led by Stanford Chemist. Features of the service include: managed income portfolios (targeting safe and reliable ~8% yields) making use of high-yield opportunities in the CEF and ETF fund space. These are geared toward both active and passive investors of all experience levels. The vast majority of CEF/ETF Income Laboratory holdings are also monthly-payers, for faster compounding and steady income streams. Other features include 24/7 chat, and trade alerts. Learn More.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Nissan’s new hybrid is a U.S.-first that mixes EV driving, gas engine

Published

on

Nissan’s new hybrid is a U.S.-first that mixes EV driving, gas engine

Nissan’s logo is illuminated on a prototype of its new all-electric Ariya crossover. Nissan’s Z Proto performance car is reflected in the vehicle’s grille, while a redesigned Nissan Pathfinder SUV sits in the background.

Michael Wayland / CNBC

Nissan Motor plans to introduce a new type of hybrid to the U.S. market that drives like an all-electric vehicle but is powered — not driven — by a traditional gas-powered engine. 

Advertisement

The new Nissan “e-Power” is called a series hybrid. It uses the engine as a generator to power the vehicle’s electric motors that then propel the vehicle. It operates like emerging extended-range electric vehicles, or EREVs, but has a smaller battery and doesn’t require a plug. 

It’s also different from a traditional hybrid, such as the Toyota Prius, because the gas engine in those vehicles is used to propel the vehicle. The series hybrid’s engine just keeps the battery charged to power the electric motors in the vehicles.

The e-Power hybrid system for Nissan is planned to launch domestically later this year in a new version of its popular Rogue compact SUV. 

Timing for such a vehicle could be ideal for Nissan with climbing gas prices, slower-than-planned adoption of EVs and an expected surge in hybrid sales amid new entries, according to officials.

Advertisement

After losing billions of dollars on EVs, automakers such as Nissan are turning to hybrid vehicles to meet customer expectations for fuel economy and to help with driving performance.

S&P Global Mobility expects hybrids in the U.S. this year to increase to 18.4% of new vehicle sales, up from 12.6% last year and 7.3% in 2023. It’s forecasting pure EVs, meanwhile, will be 7.1% of new vehicle sales, down from 8% last year.

“This is a unique powertrain for the for the U.S.,” Kurt Rosolowsky, Nissan North America vehicle evaluation and test engineer, said during a media briefing. “This is an electrically driven vehicle, as far as what is powering the wheels, but it doesn’t have a plug, and you fill it up with gas like you do with a normal car.”

Series hybrids

Nissan and other automakers have used series hybrids elsewhere, particularly in Asia, but companies have been reluctant to bring the vehicles to the U.S. because of consumer expectations for driving dynamics and power. 

Advertisement

To address those concerns, Nissan said it has developed a more powerful 1.5-liter, three-cylinder turbocharged engine specifically for the e-Power system, in addition to new packaging and other upgrades, to appease American buyers.

“The turbo is only there to serve efficiency at higher speeds for the gas engine to deliver energy,” Rosolowsky said.

The e-Power for the U.S. market is Nissan’s third generation of the series hybrid since it debuted in Japan in 2016. Since then, Nissan said it has sold more than 1.6 million vehicles globally with e-Power in nearly 70 countries.

“I think it’s going to be a really good system. I think it’s going to be very popular for Nissan in the new Rogue when it arrives later this year,” said Sam Abuelsamid, vice president of market research at communications and consulting firm Telemetry.

Advertisement

Abuelsamid said the only real drawback to the series hybrid is that it’s less efficient at higher speeds, which Nissan is trying to overcome with the new engine as well as battery size.

Driving e-Power

Driving a European version of the Nissan Rogue Sport sold with the ePower system around suburban Detroit, the vehicle’s driving dynamics — specifically fast acceleration and regenerative braking — are formidable.

They come with the familiar sound of an engine revving but without the shifting or sputtering of transmission gears and far less noise, vibration and harshness, or NVH, as the industry commonly refers to it. 

“The driving experience really is what makes it different with those fewer components. You have less noise and less vibration,” Rosolowsky said.

Advertisement

Nissan e-Power logo

Courtesy Nissan

Unlike traditional gas-powered vehicles, the e-Power system also does not require a traditional transmission to shift gears or a driveshaft that transfers torque from the transmission to the differential, powering the wheels.

While the Rogue Sport is a smaller vehicle and only forward-wheel-drive, it’s easy to see how the system will translate to a larger vehicle with all-wheel-drive, which the new Rogue with e-Power will be. 

Advertisement

The lack of a plug, some engine noise and slight vibration also might be more familiar for drivers who have been reluctant to adopt all-electric vehicles. 

While Nissan is not releasing specifics such as pricing or fuel economy for the upcoming Rogue with e-Power, the Rogue Sport was achieving more than 40 miles per gallon during heavy city driving, according to the vehicle’s MPG system.

The current Nissan Rogue, depending on the model, can achieve more than 30 MPG, according to U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Nissan’s vehicles historically been less fuel efficient than those from its larger Japanese rivals. Honda Motor and Toyota Motor, the latter of which pioneered traditional hybrids with the Prius and continues to dominate the sector in the U.S.

Advertisement

Nissan declined to discuss the possibility of expanding the e-Power system to other vehicles in the U.S., but confirmed the new system is modular and capable of working with many different engines.

“If we were to expand this to other vehicles, you can theoretically bolt this onto another gasoline engine of a different size and have more options for an e-Power system,” Rosolowsky said.

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025