This article was written by

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

This article was written by

Shares of Vedanta Oil & Gas fell as much as 3.4% to their day’s low of Rs 33.66 on the BSE on Wednesday after the company disclosed two separate legal matters involving the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) and the Directorate General of Hydrocarbons (DGH), Government of India.

In the first matter, the company said it had received demand letters from the DGH regarding four blocks awarded under the Open Acreage Licensing Policy (OALP) bidding rounds. According to the company, DGH has not granted further extensions for the four blocks and has sought payment of liquidated damages along with applicable interest.

Vedanta said it believes it has valid grounds in the matter and is pursuing appropriate legal remedies available. The company has also requested DGH to refer the matter to the Committee for External Eminent Experts (CEEE) for resolution through conciliation or mediation.

Also read: Vedanta Aluminium vs Power vs Oil & Gas vs Iron & Steel: Which stock should you buy?The company said the financial impact, if any, arising from the DGH matter will be assessed and accounted for, as required, based on the outcome of the proceedings and in accordance with applicable accounting standards. The aggregate amount claimed by DGH is approximately $35 million plus interest.

Vedanta Oil & Gas and ONGC

In a separate disclosure, the company said it had received a copy of an enforcement petition filed by ONGC before the Delhi High Court seeking enforcement of an arbitral award dated July 31, 2023, arising from arbitration proceedings between ONGC and Vedanta Limited.

At a hearing on July 20, the Delhi High Court issued a notice to the company to file its reply. No interim adverse order has been passed against the company, and the next hearing is scheduled for September 11, 2026.
The arbitral award relates to an amount of approximately $37 million applicable to Vedanta Limited and its subsidiaries. The company said the amount has already been provided for in its books of account. Vedanta is evaluating the matter and said it will pursue appropriate legal remedies.

Crisil upgrades Vedanta Oil & Gas

Earlier this week, Vedanta Oil and Gas Ltd’s long-term rating was upgraded to CRISIL AA+/Stable from CRISIL A+/Watch Developing, while its short-term rating was withdrawn.
CRISIL said the upgrade factors in the company’s stronger business and financial risk profile following the transfer of Vedanta’s oil and gas undertaking into the company as part of the demerger. Vedanta Oil and Gas is one of India’s largest private-sector oil and gas producers, operating 44 blocks covering more than 47,000 square kilometres and producing approximately 87 kilo barrels of oil equivalent per day (kboepd) in fiscal 2026.

Read more: Vedanta shares drop 26% in two months, erase all post-demerger gains. Time to buy or better to avoid?

The rating agency said the company benefits from a healthy reserve base, established producing assets and a competitive operating cost structure. More than 80% of production comes from its Rajasthan assets, while operating efficiency remains strong, supported by first-quartile operating costs and the production-sharing contract framework.

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)

As temperatures rise this summer, Japanese men are baring more leg at work than ever before.

The Tokyo Metropolitan Government is pushing company employees to ditch their usual suit and tie for more casual attire, featuring t-shirts, trainers – and shorts.

Tokyo Governor Yuriko Koike introduced “Tokyo Cool Biz” in April, hoping to expand on her signature cool down initiative which has now become a widely recognised annual summer tradition.

Almost four months in, the newly allowed shorts in the office policy is getting mixed reviews.

Some commentators enjoy the relaxed rules, helping them work more comfortably. Others say the policy is unfair to women since they are still expected to wear tights when showing a part of their legs. And a few women describe the experience of “leg hair harassment” or a term coined online as “sunehara”, referring to the discomfort of being forced to see their colleague’s leg hair.

“We want to give people more options in the severe heat, not tell them what to wear. There should be no issue as long as the work attire is not offensive to anyone,” Tokyo Metropolitan Government environmental official Noboru Watanabe told the BBC.

A June survey by Gorilla Clinic found 53.5% opposed wearing shorts to work in the summer while 46.5% were in favour of the new recommendation.

For those against shorts in the office the main reason, for both genders, was the concern over body shape and body hair. The clinic says women significantly outnumbered men in their response, indicating that women may be more resistant to seeing a male colleague’s bare legs.

In recent years more Japanese workers, notably those working at startups and tech companies, have started wearing casual clothes. But this year, the Tokyo government recommendation has made it more socially acceptable. Still, some men have been feeling self-conscious about their leg hair.

Akifumi Funatsu, the director of Gorilla Clinic, says he has noticed more clients coming to the clinic not just for cosmetic reasons, but as a matter of “social etiquette when wearing shorts”. He thinks women believe that “men should have less leg hair”, which has prompted them to seek laser hair removal so as not to offend those around them.

About 6,600 people who told New Jersey’s Motor Vehicle Commission they were noncitizens ended up registered to vote in 2023 and 2024. Gov. Mikie Sherrill announced the error Tuesday, blamed it on a software problem at the agency, and said fewer than 400 of those people actually cast a ballot. She has ordered the wrongful registrations removed and opened an investigation into how it happened.

The announcement lands in the middle of a national fight over noncitizen voting, an issue President Donald Trump has raised repeatedly this year. Here is what is known so far, and what comes next.

New Jersey voter controversy: What actually happened?

New Jersey is one of 19 states that let people living in the US illegally hold a driver’s license or state ID, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. It is also one of roughly half the states with automatic voter registration, which lets eligible people opt in to registering when they get a license or use certain other state services.
A software error at the Motor Vehicle Commission caused the system to register some people as voters even after they indicated they were not citizens. Sherrill said the error occurred under the previous administration and blamed it on the state’s vendor, which she is now replacing.

“I am appalled by the reckless failures that allowed this to happen and the lack of transparency shown by those in charge at the time,” Sherrill said in a statement.

NJ Registered Voters: How many people actually voted?

Of the roughly 6,600 wrongly registered, fewer than 400 are believed to have cast a ballot, based on Sherrill’s preliminary analysis. That is a small fraction of New Jersey’s roughly 6.9 million registered voters and the more than 4 million people who voted in the 2024 presidential election. Sherrill said the registrations were not limited to one party — the affected group included people who signed up as Democrats, Republicans and independents.

Is this part of a bigger pattern?

New Jersey’s error is not the first of its kind. Other states with automatic voter registration have reported similar mistakes:Oregon: State officials found in 2024 that about 1,600 people were registered through the DMV without proof of citizenship. Most were later confirmed to be citizens, and the state said only about 30 ineligible voters had cast ballots.
Colorado: Officials said in 2022 they had mistakenly sent postcards to 30,000 noncitizens inviting them to register. The state said it would not have allowed any of them to register even if they had tried.
California: A 2019 audit of the state’s DMV registration program found errors that may have let about 1,500 people register incorrectly, some of whom may not have been citizens.

These cases predate New Jersey’s disclosure and involve different states, systems and numbers, but they point to the same underlying issue: automatic registration systems tied to DMV records can misfire when citizenship status isn’t verified correctly.

Separately, the Department of Homeland Security has said it identified about 278,000 noncitizens registered to vote in federal elections nationwide, concentrated mostly in California, Nevada, New Jersey and Pennsylvania. That figure has not been independently verified, and Pennsylvania’s Department of State has disputed its relevance, saying in a statement that noncitizen voting is extremely rare nationally, including in Pennsylvania.

Why is New Jersey voter Controversy politically charged?

Trump and other Republicans have argued for months that noncitizen voting is a widespread problem in US elections. Election officials and researchers generally say confirmed cases are rare, and that noncitizen voting is a felony that can result in deportation when detected.

New Jersey’s disclosure gave the White House an opening to push Trump’s SAVE America Act, which would require documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote and impose voter ID rules nationwide. The bill has passed the House but has not come up for a vote in the Senate, where it faces opposition from some Republicans as well as Democrats.

“American voters deserve to have confidence that our elections are safe and secure,” White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said in a statement.

Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin suggested on X that a federal report was what prompted Sherrill to act.

“Appreciate you responding back to our letter, @GovSherrillNJ. This should’ve been done a LONG time ago,” Mullin wrote. “Just ONE illegal vote cancels out the vote of a U.S. citizen.”

Sherrill, for her part, framed the episode as evidence that she is protecting the integrity of the state’s elections rather than a sign of a larger crisis.

“As the Trump Administration tries to weaponize elections for political gain, I am ensuring we protect our elections,” she said.

Who is responsible for this controversy?

The error occurred while Phil Murphy, also a Democrat, was governor. A representative for Murphy did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the matter.

Christine Hanlon, chair of the Republican party organization in New Jersey, said the state needs a bipartisan investigation into both the error and why it wasn’t disclosed sooner.

“The system and verification process must be improved in order to safeguard our elections,” Hanlon said in a statement. “The public also deserves to know why this was covered up and who was responsible for keeping this critical information from the public.”

What happens next?

Sherrill has ordered the removal of all erroneous registrations added during the 2023-2024 period and is replacing the vendor that operated the Motor Vehicle Commission’s registration system. She has also launched an investigation into how the software error occurred and why it wasn’t caught sooner.

Whether that investigation becomes bipartisan, as Hanlon has requested, is not yet clear. The outcome could also feed into the ongoing debate in Washington over the SAVE America Act, which remains stalled in the Senate.

White House Points to Federal Voting Bill

The White House used the announcement to promote Trump’s SAVE America Act. The bill would require people to show documents proving citizenship before they register to vote and would set voter ID rules nationwide. The House has passed the bill, but it has not received a vote in the Senate, where some Republicans oppose it.

“American voters deserve to have confidence that our elections are safe and secure,” White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said in a statement.

Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said on X that a federal report may have pushed Sherrill to act.

“Appreciate you responding back to our letter, @GovSherrillNJ. This should’ve been done a LONG time ago,” Mullin wrote. “Just ONE illegal vote cancels out the vote of a U.S. citizen.”

Trump Has Focused on New Jersey

Last week, Trump cited a Department of Homeland Security investigation that identified about 278,000 noncitizens registered to vote in federal elections nationwide. The department said most of them were in California, Nevada, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.

Pennsylvania’s Department of State pushed back on the claim. In a statement from Gov. Josh Shapiro’s office, the department said noncitizen voting is extremely rare across the country, including in Pennsylvania. It said it would review any information the Department of Homeland Security provides.

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump said this week that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will not be arrested during any future visit to the United States, pushing back after New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani suggested his administration was weighing whether to detain the Israeli leader under an outstanding international arrest warrant.

The exchange has reignited a long-simmering dispute over the reach of the International Criminal Court inside the United States, and has put a spotlight on Mamdani, the newly elected Democratic mayor, as he navigates one of the most politically fraught issues in his young administration.

Trump’s warning

In a post on Truth Social on Monday, Trump wrote that Netanyahu “will not be arrested, in any way, shape, or form, while in the United States of America.” The president did not name Mamdani directly, but the post came in direct response to the mayor’s recent comments and credited Israel with assisting the United States in its conflict with Iran.

Trump went further in the same post, writing that Netanyahu “is fighting against the Islamic Republic of Iran, which recently killed 52,000 innocent protestors, and has spent the last 47 years killing American Soldiers, and others.” He added that “the only ones that should be arrested are the people that led Iran into this unprecedented SPIRAL OF DEATH AND DESTRUCTION, something that should have been dealt with years ago, by previous Presidents!”

Mamdani’s response

Mamdani, who took office in January, had said in an interview broadcast over the weekend that New York City’s legal department was actively reviewing what options the law might allow if Netanyahu travels to the city for the United Nations General Assembly this September, as he traditionally does.

“I believe that Prime Minister Netanyahu belongs in The Hague. He’s a war criminal who has been charged by the International Criminal Court,” Mamdani said during the interview, part of a New York Times video podcast called “The Interview.”

The mayor doubled down on Tuesday, posting on social media platform X that Netanyahu “is a war criminal” and asserting he was “responsible for the killing of more than 73,000 people,” adding, “I agree with the ICC” and that Netanyahu “should be arrested and tried for war crimes.”

Mamdani has since clarified the limits of what his office believes it can legally do. In comments to the Times, he said, “Whatever the law allows me to do in New York City, that’s what we will do, but we won’t be writing our own laws to that end.” During his mayoral campaign, Mamdani had said arresting Netanyahu, should the opportunity arise, was something “I intend to fulfill.”

Israel and U.S. officials push back

Netanyahu’s government responded sharply. In a post on X, Israeli officials called the ICC a “kangaroo court” and described the arrest warrant against Netanyahu as “bogus,” adding that Mamdani “appears interested in diverting public attention from his follies and attacking the leader of the Jewish state and the only democracy in the Middle East.”

Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations, Danny Danon, separately dismissed Mamdani’s threat as lacking any legal basis. Danon said the mayor has “no jurisdiction” to act on the ICC warrant, noting that the United States has never joined the Rome Statute, the treaty that established the court. “The U.S. is not part of the ICC so there is no warrant against a prime minister in the U.S., and there is no jurisdiction for the mayor,” Danon said, adding that “the only thing the mayor can do is sit in the sidelines and maybe learn something about the rule of law.”

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz also weighed in over the weekend, laying out several legal reasons he said made Mamdani’s threat unworkable. In a post on X, Waltz wrote that the United States is not party to the Rome Statute, that the United Nations headquarters agreement grants diplomatic protections to visiting heads of government, that head-of-state immunity applies, and that federal authority supersedes the wishes of a local mayor. Waltz went on to call Mamdani’s comments “pure political theater.”

The ICC warrant

The International Criminal Court, based in The Hague, issued its warrant for Netanyahu in November 2024, alleging he bears responsibility for war crimes including the use of starvation as a method of warfare and for directing attacks against civilians in Gaza during Israel’s military campaign there. The warrant followed the Hamas-led attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, which triggered the war.

Israel has rejected the court’s jurisdiction entirely and denies that it has committed war crimes in Gaza. Neither Israel nor the United States is a member of the ICC, a body established in 2002 with authority to prosecute genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. The Trump administration has separately pursued a broader campaign against the court, imposing sanctions on ICC judges, prosecutors and affiliated organizations that have sought rulings against Israel.

A complicated relationship

Trump and Mamdani have not always been at odds. Shortly after Mamdani’s election victory last November, the mayor-elect and the president held what was described as an unexpectedly friendly meeting at the White House, despite having previously exchanged public insults during the campaign.

Netanyahu typically travels to New York each September to address the U.N. General Assembly, a visit that would put this year’s dispute to its most direct test. Whether Mamdani’s administration takes any action if Netanyahu arrives in the city remains uncertain, and legal experts broadly agree that any attempt to enforce the ICC warrant on U.S. soil would face substantial legal and diplomatic obstacles, given the immunities typically extended to visiting heads of government and the country’s position outside the court’s jurisdiction.

For now, the dispute stands as a proxy for a broader rift within the Democratic Party over Israel policy, with Mamdani’s stance drawing both support and criticism from within his own party as the September gathering approaches.