Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Business

How Does Its Free Plan Compare With Proton VPN and Windscribe?

Published

on

X-VPN Review 2026: How Does Its Free Plan Compare With

Free VPNs are not all built the same. Some give you unlimited data, others let you pick a location but cap how much you can use each month. The differences become much clearer once you compare them side by side.

For this X-VPN review, we tested all three under comparable free-plan conditions. We compared their speeds, kill switches, ads, protocol options, privacy practices, device limits, and data restrictions.

The goal is simple: to see how X-VPN Free performs in everyday use, where it stands out, where it falls behind, and how it compares with Proton VPN Free and Windscribe Free.

X-VPN Free vs Proton VPN Free vs Windscribe Free

Advertisement

X-VPN, Windscribe, and Proton VPN all offer a permanent free plan, but they place the limits in very different places.

Here is how the three free plans compare before testing:

Feature X-VPN Free Windscribe Free Proton VPN Free
Registration Not required Account required Proton Account required
Email Not required Optional; 2GB without a verified email, 10GB with one Required; verification was not needed to use the free plan in our test
Data allowance Unlimited 2GB or 10GB per month Unlimited
Simultaneous connections Unlimited devices Unlimited personal devices 1 device
Free locations 15 countries 10 countries 10 countries
Manual location selection Available on iOS and Android Available Not available
Server switching 15 countries in the tested iOS app; automatically assigned on macOS Manual selection available Automatically assigned, with cooldowns between server changes
Kill switch Included Included as Firewall Included
In-app ads No ads on desktop; ads on iOS and Android No ads No ads
No-logs audits 2026 ISAE 3000 no-logs audit by Deloitte App and server infrastructure audits Five consecutive years of public no-logs audits

On features alone, X-VPN is the least restrictive of the three. It combines unlimited data with no registration, unlimited device use, and a larger selection of free locations. Windscribe offers more control than Proton VPN, but its monthly allowance makes it harder to use continuously. Proton VPN takes the opposite approach: there is no data cap, but free users give up server choice and can connect only one device at a time.

That does not make the feature table a final ranking. A free VPN can offer more locations and still be slow, or include a kill switch that behaves differently across platforms.

Advertisement

The rest of this review tests whether these differences matter in practice. We will check how reliably the security features work, how the three services perform on the same network, and whether restrictions around ads, servers, protocols, and device use change the everyday experience.

How We Tested the Three Free VPNs

We tested X-VPN Free, Windscribe Free, and Proton VPN Free in the United States using the same Wi-Fi connection. Testing was carried out on a 13-inch MacBook Pro running macOS 26.2 and an iPhone 17 running iOS 26.5.1. All speed tests were measured with Speedtest by Ookla.

Every test was run strictly on the free plan. We did not use trials, paid accounts, premium servers, or paid-only features. We also did not keep reconnecting until a VPN produced a better result. If a service assigned the server automatically, we treated that lack of choice as part of the free experience.

Advertisement

How Restrictive Is Each Free Plan?

The three free plans place their limits in different areas. X-VPN removes most account, data, and device restrictions. Windscribe offers stronger server control but caps monthly usage. Proton VPN provides unlimited data but limits both devices and server choice.

Account and Email Requirements

VPN Account required Email required What we found
X-VPN Free No No We could open the app and connect immediately without providing any information.
Windscribe Free Yes Optional A username and password were enough to connect. Adding an email increased the monthly data allowance.
Proton VPN Free Yes Yes Proton sent a verification email, but we could use the free VPN without verifying it.
X-VPN free
X-VPN free

X-VPN free

Windscribe free
Windscribe free

Windscribe free

Proton VPN free
Proton VPN free

Proton VPN free

X-VPN had the lowest entry barrier and collected the least information during setup. Windscribe offered a middle ground by requiring an account but not an email.

Advertisement

Data Limits

VPN Data allowance Usage counter
X-VPN Free Unlimited No
Windscribe Free 2GB per month without an email; 10GB with one Yes
Proton VPN Free Unlimited No
Windscribe
Windscribe

Windscribe limits users to 2GB per month without a verified email address, or 10GB with one

Windscribe clearly displayed the remaining allowance in the app. Its cap may be enough for occasional browsing, but it is more restrictive for continuous use.

Device Limits

VPN Free device policy
X-VPN Free Can be used on multiple devices at the same time without an account
Windscribe Free Supports multiple devices
Proton VPN Free Limited to one active device

X-VPN and Windscribe were easier to use across a laptop and phone. Proton required an upgrade for additional simultaneous connections.

Advertisement

Server Access and Location Control

VPN Free locations Manual selection City-level servers
X-VPN Free 15 countries in the tested iOS app Mobile: yes; macOS: automatic connection only 13 US cities on iOS
Windscribe Free 10 countries Yes Available in supported locations
Proton VPN Free Automatically assigned free server No No

Windscribe provided the most consistent manual server control. X-VPN offered country and city selection on mobile, but not on macOS. Proton gave free users the least control, since both the initial server and any replacement were assigned automatically.

Overall, X-VPN was the least restrictive for registration, data, and device use. Windscribe offered better server control but imposed a monthly cap, while Proton combined unlimited data with stricter device and location limits.

Do the Kill Switches Actually Work?

Advertisement

All three free VPNs included a working kill switch, although they handled it slightly differently.

X-VPN and Proton VPN both left the feature off by default, so we had to enable it manually. Windscribe calls its version Firewall rather than Kill Switch, but it serves the same purpose and switched on automatically when we connected to a free server.

VPN Feature name Available on free plan Default behavior
X-VPN Free Kill Switch Yes Off by default
Windscribe Free Firewall Yes Turns on automatically when connected
Proton VPN Free Kill Switch Yes Off by default

Kill Switch Test Results

We first opened IPLeak without a VPN and confirmed that it showed our real location and IP address. We then connected each VPN, enabled its kill switch where necessary, and refreshed the page to confirm that the VPN server IP had replaced the original one.

Advertisement

Next, we forced the VPN connection to drop and tried to reload the page.

VPN VPN IP shown while connected Internet blocked after VPN drop Result
X-VPN Free Yes Yes Passed
Windscribe Free Yes Yes Passed
Proton VPN Free Yes Yes Passed

In all three tests, the page stopped loading completely once the VPN connection was interrupted. None of the apps allowed the browser to fall back to the regular internet connection.

Speed Test: Which Free VPN Is Fastest?

Speed is where the three free plans showed the clearest difference. X-VPN kept the largest share of our original connection speed, while Proton VPN recorded the biggest slowdown, particularly on uploads.

Advertisement

Test Conditions

We tested all three VPNs in the United States using the same MacBook, Wi-Fi network, and testing period. All results were measured with Speedtest by Ookla.

X-VPN was tested over WireGuard, Windscribe over its Stealth mode, and Proton VPN connected over IKEv2 in our test. We recorded a fresh no-VPN baseline before testing each app. Since the baseline changed slightly between runs, the percentage loss gives a fairer comparison than the raw Mbps figures alone.

Speed Test Results

Advertisement
VPN No-VPN Download VPN Download Download Loss No-VPN Upload VPN Upload Upload Loss
X-VPN Free 248.01 Mbps 198.65 Mbps 19.9% 216.53 Mbps 138.03 Mbps 36.3%
Windscribe Free 247.90 Mbps 114.31 Mbps 53.9% 213.25 Mbps 91.61 Mbps 57.0%
Proton VPN Free 235.27 Mbps 88.05 Mbps 62.6% 203.97 Mbps 5.76 Mbps 97.2%

X-VPN delivered the fastest result in our test configuration. It retained about 80% of the baseline download speed and remained comfortably fast for browsing, downloads, and high-resolution video.

X-VPN baseline speed without a VPN: 248.01 Mbps download and
X-VPN baseline speed without a VPN: 248.01 Mbps download and 216.53 Mbps upload

X-VPN baseline speed without a VPN: 248.01 Mbps download and 216.53 Mbps upload

X-VPN Free speed over WireGuard: 198.65 Mbps download and 138.03
X-VPN Free speed over WireGuard: 198.65 Mbps download and 138.03 Mbps upload

X-VPN Free speed over WireGuard: 198.65 Mbps download and 138.03 Mbps upload

Windscribe remained usable, but its download speed fell by about 54%, while uploads dropped by 57%.

Windscribe baseline speed without a VPN: 247.90 Mbps download and
Windscribe baseline speed without a VPN: 247.90 Mbps download and 213.25 Mbps upload

Windscribe baseline speed without a VPN: 247.90 Mbps download and 213.25 Mbps upload

Windscribe Free speed over Stealth mode: 114.31 Mbps download and
Windscribe Free speed over Stealth mode: 114.31 Mbps download and 91.61 Mbps upload

Windscribe Free speed over Stealth mode: 114.31 Mbps download and 91.61 Mbps upload

Proton VPN had the weakest result. Download speed fell from 235.27 Mbps to 88.05 Mbps, and upload speed dropped to just 5.76 Mbps. The download connection was still sufficient for everyday browsing and other download-heavy tasks, but the upload result could be restrictive for cloud backups, large file transfers, or video calls.

Proton VPN baseline speed without a VPN: 235.27 Mbps download
Proton VPN baseline speed without a VPN: 235.27 Mbps download and 203.97 Mbps upload

Proton VPN baseline speed without a VPN: 235.27 Mbps download and 203.97 Mbps upload

Proton VPN Free speed over IKEv2 during our test: 88.05
Proton VPN Free speed over IKEv2 during our test: 88.05 Mbps download and 5.76 Mbps upload

Proton VPN Free speed over IKEv2 during our test: 88.05 Mbps download and 5.76 Mbps upload

Speed Verdict

Advertisement

Based on this round of testing, X-VPN Free delivered the best balance of download and upload performance. Windscribe placed second, while Proton VPN showed the largest speed loss.

These results reflect the free server assigned or available during our test, rather than the maximum speed each service can achieve. Free-server load, distance, and automatic server selection can all affect performance, so results may differ by location and time.

Ads

The three free apps handled ads very differently.

Advertisement
VPN Desktop ads Mobile ads What we found
X-VPN Free None Yes The macOS app was completely ad-free. On mobile, an ad appeared when connecting and closed automatically after a short wait.
Windscribe Free None None We did not encounter ads during testing.
Proton VPN Free None None We did not encounter ads during testing.

X-VPN’s desktop experience was just as clean as Windscribe and Proton VPN. Its mobile ads added some friction, but they did not prevent us from connecting or using the VPN normally. Windscribe and Proton VPN provided the cleaner overall experience because neither displayed ads.

Protocol Choice on the Free Plans

Which Protocols Are Available?

VPN Available protocols Manual selection
X-VPN Free WireGuard, OpenVPN, Everest Yes
Windscribe Free WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2, Stealth Yes
Proton VPN Free Managed automatically; IKEv2 in our test No

X-VPN Free let us manually select Everest, OpenVPN, or WireGuard. These options were available without upgrading or signing in.

Advertisement
Windscribe also offered several protocols, including WireGuard, IKEv2, OpenVPN, and
Windscribe also offered several protocols, including WireGuard, IKEv2, OpenVPN, and its Stealth mode. 

Windscribe also offered several protocols, including WireGuard, IKEv2, OpenVPN, and its Stealth mode.

Proton VPN took a simpler approach: the free app selected
Proton VPN took a simpler approach: the free app selected the connection protocol automatically and did not provide a manual protocol menu.

Proton VPN took a simpler approach: the free app selected the connection protocol automatically and did not provide a manual protocol menu.

Are the Protocols Easy to Find?

X-VPN displayed each protocol by name under VPN Settings > Protocol, making the options easy to find and switch between.

Windscribe also showed protocol names inside the app.

Proton VPN required no protocol setup, which may be easier for beginners, but it also gave free users no control over which protocol was used.

Advertisement

Overall, X-VPN and Windscribe offered the most flexibility. Proton prioritized automatic configuration over manual choice.

Privacy: What Do Free Users Give Up?

All three services extend their core no-logs protections to free users. The main difference is how much information they require at signup and how much limited account data they retain.

X-VPN Free

Advertisement

X-VPN applies the same no-logs policy to free and paid users. Its systems and supporting operations underwent an independent limited assurance engagement by Deloitte Singapore under ISAE 3000 (Revised), with testing concluded on February 28, 2026.

According to the report and privacy policy, X-VPN does not collect or store user or destination IP addresses, browsing activity, visited websites, VPN server information, DNS queries, downloaded content, connection timestamps, or sensitive payment details. Free users can also connect without creating an account or providing an email address, giving X-VPN the strongest data minimization at signup.

Windscribe Free

Windscribe requires a username and password, but an email address is optional. Its privacy policy states that it does not store source IP addresses, visited websites, or historical VPN sessions.

Advertisement

It does retain the total amount of data transferred over a 30-day period, the timestamp of the account’s last activity, and the number of simultaneous connections. Windscribe says this information is used to enforce free-plan limits and prevent abuse rather than track browsing activity.

Windscribe has also published independent audits of its FreshScribe server stack, desktop app, and mobile apps. These are presented as infrastructure and application security audits rather than a recurring annual no-logs assurance program.

Proton VPN Free

Proton VPN’s no-logs policy covers both free and paid users. It states that it does not log internet traffic, communication content, or VPN session data.

Advertisement

Its no-logs infrastructure has undergone five consecutive annual audits by Securitum. The 2026 review examined whether Proton stored browsing activity, DNS queries, destination services, traffic content, or user-identifiable connection metadata and found no persistent records linking a user to activity through the reviewed servers.

Proton required us to create an account and provide an email address. That adds more account data than X-VPN or an email-free Windscribe account, although it does not mean Proton records VPN activity.

Ease of Use

VPN Setup Server control Protocol controls Ads
X-VPN Free Install and connect; no account required Automatic on macOS; manual country and US city selection on mobile Clearly labeled and manually selectable None on desktop; connection ads on mobile
Windscribe Free Install, create a username and password, then connect Manual country and city selection Clearly labeled and manually selectable None
Proton VPN Free Install, create an account with an email, then connect Server list is clear, but selection is automatic Protocol selected automatically None

Final Scorecard

Advertisement

Because stability and streaming were not included in the final comparison, we used the following weights:

Category Weight X-VPN Free Proton VPN Free Windscribe Free
Free-plan value 20% 9.5 7.5 7.5
Privacy and data handling 25% 9.0 9.5 8.0
Security and kill switch 20% 9.0 9.0 9.5
Speed 20% 9.0 4.5 7.0
Ease of use and ads 10% 8.5 8.0 8.0
Protocol choice 5% 9.5 4.0 9.5
Overall 100% 9.1/10 7.6/10 8.1/10

Final Verdict: Is X-VPN Free Worth Using?

Yes. X-VPN Free is worth considering for users who want a VPN they can install and use immediately without creating an account, watching a data counter, or managing device slots.

Its main advantage over Proton VPN and Windscribe is not a single feature. It is the combination of no registration, unlimited data, unlimited device use, a working kill switch, manual protocol selection, and the best speed result in the configuration we tested. Its main compromises are mobile ads and more limited server control on macOS.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

You can’t spell chai latte without AI. That will hurt India

Published

on

You can’t spell chai latte without AI. That will hurt India
Starbucks Corp. is brewing a tempest in a chai latte cup.

The coffee chain is tapping artificial intelligence to develop in-house alternatives to systems by Microsoft and IBM that track inventory and manage equipment, Bloomberg News reported last week, after reviewing an internal presentation. According to the article, the Seattle-based company has been working for several years to replace Oracle’s point-of-sale system.

This will be disturbing news in Bengaluru and Hyderabad: Maintaining these very technologies for large multinationals like Starbucks is the bread and butter for the 6 million coders employed by India’s outsourcing industry.

The AI adoption craze is looming over what’s promising to be another lackluster earnings season for IT services exporters. Last week, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., the biggest among them, reported 0.4% growth in revenue over the previous three months after stripping out currency fluctuations, the slowest expansion in a year. While the company has shed 3% of its workforce in the past year to about 594,000, the spending on third-party specialist contractors to bridge the firm’s own skills gaps ate into revenue. Net profit margin shrank.

Advertisement

At smaller rival HCL Technologies Ltd., sales in the three months to June slipped 0.5% quarter-on-quarter after holding exchange rates constant. The management kept its annual revenue growth guidance of 1% to 4% unchanged, but it still ended up shrinking its employee base by nearly 3,300 people — the sharpest contraction in close to two years. For HCL Tech, too, a rise in subcontractor costs mitigated the wage savings.

460585934 (1)Bloomberg

For 25 years, India’s software services firms have locked global corporate clients into lucrative contracts to implement and maintain packaged software. Before the arrival of AI tools, it wouldn’t have been cost-effective for a firm like Starbucks, whose business is beverage, to take an IBM system out of its shrink wrap and map it to every piece of kitchen equipment, maintenance schedules, and local technicians across a labyrinthine network of 40,000-plus stores globally. That’s the kind of stuff around which Indian IT vendors have built a $250 billion exports powerhouse.
Similarly, making sure that a multinational can safely add a new local payment method — or correctly reflect a discount or tax change — has been a lucrative annuity for Indian programmers. They specialize in testing for various scenarios that could make the cash registers go down even for a minute. Largely hidden from public view, they keep global supply chains working 24×7 by managing the data pipelines that sync third-party inventory tools with an enterprise’s own resource planning software.To be sure, these long-term, multimillion-dollar orders haven’t completely dried up. TCS shares jumped Monday after the company disclosed that it would be expanding the role it has played in managing the infrastructure and applications for ABB. The new mandate is to design and run the Zurich-based engineering giant’s network as a modern, AI-driven service. HCL Technologies recently won a 5.5-year, $1.14 billion contract to build an AI-driven operating model for a large European engineering and manufacturing conglomerate it didn’t name.

Still, the pricing of large outsourcing deals in the age of AI remains under a question mark. After all, clients will fully expect their suppliers to use fewer humans — and more AI — to keep their tech infrastructure running smoothly. Accordingly, they will pay them less than before.

As for customers embedding artificial intelligence in their own workflows, they’ll probably pay the upfront cost of gathering the unstructured data scattered around their firms and labeling everything correctly. But after a quarter or two, AI agents will use the cleaned-up data to write their own code. The annuity business will have a slow fade, with lumpy AI-related work helping to mask the decline for some time.

460527414 (1)Bloomberg

Worse, as clients like Starbucks open their own direct engineering hubs in places like Bengaluru and Nashville — using AI to let small, in-house teams do the work of large code-writing armies — the middleman’s markup becomes an obvious target for cost-cutters.

While the stock market is still giving a thumbs up to any order wins, the NSE IT Index finished June 10% lower than five years ago. Even during the worst of the Global Financial Crisis, pessimism didn’t run this deep. Maybe the gloom is overdone, and US clients will eventually curb their enthusiasm for AI. They may come to realize that even as their token budgets go through the roof, their corporate data and workflows are slipping out of their control and going to frontier AI labs.

Advertisement

However, it’s also possible that investors have read the tea leaves right, and it’s the outsourcing firms that are yet to wake up and smell the coffee.

Continue Reading

Business

AI chip startups FuriosaAI, Nuvacore, d-Matrix pursue major funding rounds at higher valuations- The Information

Published

on


AI chip startups FuriosaAI, Nuvacore, d-Matrix pursue major funding rounds at higher valuations- The Information

Continue Reading

Business

Rio Tinto reports Pilbara record, monitors Strait of Hormuz

Published

on

Rio Tinto reports Pilbara record, monitors Strait of Hormuz

Higher diesel prices lifted unit costs across Rio Tinto’s expansive Pilbara operations, although the miner reported no material disruption to production across its core commodities.

Continue Reading

Business

Alcoa and Japanese partners approve gallium project

Published

on

Alcoa and Japanese partners approve gallium project

Alcoa and its Japanese industry partners have approved development of a gallium production facility in WA’s South West after gaining support from the Australian and US governments.

Continue Reading

Business

China economic growth falls sharply, missing target

Published

on

A woman with dark hair pulled back from her face points to a plaster on her arm

China’s economic growth slowed sharply between the start of April and end of June as weak demand domestically and the impact of the Iran war on oil prices overshadowed the country’s strong exports.

Official gross domestic product (GDP) figures showed that the world’s second largest economy grew in the second quarter of the year by 4.3%, below Beijing’s annual target.

The announcement comes a day after government data showed that China’s exports jumped by 27% in June compared to a year earlier.

In March, China cut the target to a range of 4.5%-5%, its lowest economic expansion goal since 1991 – a move some analysts say gives officials more flexibility in managing the economy.

Advertisement

The figures mark the first full quarter of GDP data since the start of the Iran war on 28 February and comes after a rise of 5% in the first quarter.

Separate data released on Wednesday highlighted the economic challenges Beijing is facing at home – including a long-running property market slump and weak consumer spending.

New home prices contracted again, although the 0.1% fall in June was at a slightly slower pace than the previous month.

But retail sales rose by 1% in June, improving from a 0.6% decrease in May.

Advertisement

Customs data for June, which was released on Tuesday, showed that China’s tech exports were boosted by soaring global demand for semiconductors to power artificial intelligence (AI) data centres.

Surging demand for Chinese electric vehicles (EVs) also gave a major boost to China’s exports – with monthly car exports topping one million for the first time.

Continue Reading

Business

Meta sued over AI use in layoffs targeting workers on medical, parental leave

Published

on

Meta to lay off about 200 workers in San Francisco Bay Area in May

A group of 26 Meta employees sued the tech giant over accusations that it used AI-powered software to choose people for mass layoffs, disproportionately targeting workers with disabilities or those who took medical, parental or family leave.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Oakland, California, on Monday, alleges that the company relied on factors such as internal AI systems, keystroke and activity-monitoring data, AI token-usage dashboards and algorithmically assisted performance rankings when making job cuts earlier this year.

Advertisement

Many of these factors “by design, cannot be accumulated by an employee who is on protected medical or family leave, or whose output is reduced by a disability,” the lawsuit reads, adding that the company did not factor in protected leave when taking employees’ scores into account and “did not pause the system for the individualized, leave- and accommodation-neutral review that the law requires.”

The plaintiffs are among the 8,000 employees, or about 10% of its workforce, who Meta said in May would be impacted by layoffs, and they were told their jobs would be eliminated starting July 22.

FOUR STATES SEEKING $1.4 TRILLION IN PENALTIES IN CHILD SOCIAL MEDIA ADDICTION TRIAL, META SAYS

Signage outside Meta headquarters

A group of 26 Meta employees sued the tech giant alleging it used AI-powered software to choose people for mass layoffs. (David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images / Getty Images)

They claim that Meta violated state and federal laws — including the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act and the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act — that prohibit discrimination or retaliation against workers who take medical leave, have disabilities or are pregnant.

Advertisement

The workers also say the company failed to test its AI systems for bias, which they allege violated newly adopted laws in California and New York City.

The plaintiffs, who come from six states, including California and New York, as well as Washington, D.C., are seeking a preliminary ruling from the court to block Meta from completing the layoffs while they pursue their claims in private arbitration.

The employees argue that Meta’s agreements require employees to arbitrate workplace disputes individually, but do not apply to requests for temporary relief.

Meta's app icons on a smartphone

The plaintiffs are among the 8,000 employees, or about 10% of its workforce, that Meta said in May would be impacted by layoffs. (Photo Illustration by Onur Dogman/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images / Getty Images)

They said the lawsuit asks just to preserve the status quo and keep them employed pending arbitration.

Advertisement

“Once these terminations are finalized, the harm to Plaintiffs cannot be undone by money damages alone,” the lawsuit reads, citing the loss of employer-subsidized health coverage during pregnancy, postpartum recovery and active medical treatment.

Meta has pushed back on the allegations outlined in the lawsuit, saying that it does not use AI when determining who to cut from its workforce.

“These claims lack merit and are not based on facts. Workforce management and organizational decisions were and are made by people, not AI,” a Meta spokesperson told Fox Business.

META SHUTS DOWN AI TOOL AFTER BACKLASH OVER PUBLIC INSTAGRAM ACCOUNTS

Advertisement
A smartphone showing Mark Zuckerberg’s image is held in front of a computer screen with the Meta logo.

Meta said that it does not use AI when determining who to cut from its workforce. (Arda Kucukkaya/Anadolu via Getty Images / Getty Images)

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

About half of the plaintiffs had taken leave for caregiving or pregnancy-related reasons.

Eight employees are women who had taken maternity or pregnancy-related leave, four are men who had taken parental leave and one is a woman who had taken leave to take care of a family member and later bereavement leave.

The plaintiffs argued that Meta’s “algorithmically assisted selection process, by systematically recording such absences as reduced performance, falls more heavily on women than on men” because women disproportionately take pregnancy and caregiving leave.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

China new home prices decline at slower pace in June

Published

on


China new home prices decline at slower pace in June

Continue Reading

Business

Loop Industries earnings missed by $0.02, revenue fell short of estimates

Published

on


Loop Industries earnings missed by $0.02, revenue fell short of estimates

Continue Reading

Business

Taiwan’s premium mangoes wing their way to Europe for the first time

Published

on


Taiwan’s premium mangoes wing their way to Europe for the first time

Continue Reading

Business

China Q2 GDP disappoints as sluggish domestic demand offsets exports boost

Published

on


China Q2 GDP disappoints as sluggish domestic demand offsets exports boost

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025