Samsung’s groundbreaking Galaxy Z TriFold, the company’s first trifold smartphone, has taken the mobile world by storm since its global debut late last year. Now available in the United States after a rapid sell-out upon launch, the device commands attention with its innovative multi-folding design, massive display and premium specifications — though at a steep price that positions it as a luxury item rather than a mainstream handset.

Announced December 1, 2025, the Galaxy Z TriFold first hit shelves in South Korea on December 12, 2025, before expanding to select markets. U.S. availability began January 30, 2026, exclusively through Samsung.com and Samsung Experience Stores in the Crafted Black color with 512GB storage. Priced at $2,899, it quickly sold out within minutes — or even seconds in some reports — reflecting intense demand despite the eye-watering cost. Samsung confirmed a restock for February 20, 2026, at 10 a.m. ET / 7 a.m. PT, with notifications sent to interested buyers via email. As of mid-February 2026, stock remains limited, with production reportedly capped at 30,000 to 40,000 units per region globally, fueling scarcity and resale speculation.

The TriFold’s appeal lies in its unique form factor: a dual-hinge system that folds inward for durability and portability. When fully folded, it measures 159.2 x 75 x 12.9 mm and weighs 309 grams, resembling a thick premium smartphone with a 6.5-inch FHD+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X cover display featuring a 120Hz adaptive refresh rate. Unfold once for tablet-like use, then unfold again to reveal a stunning 10-inch QXGA (2160 x 1584) Dynamic AMOLED 2X inner screen — the largest ever on a Galaxy smartphone — also with 120Hz refresh. This makes it ideal for multitasking, immersive media consumption and productivity, transforming from pocketable phone to mini-tablet hybrid.

Powering the device is Qualcomm’s customized Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy chipset, paired with 16GB of RAM for seamless performance across demanding apps, gaming and AI tasks. Storage starts at 512GB (with some markets offering 1TB), though no microSD expansion is available. Battery life benefits from a massive 5,600 mAh three-cell system distributed across the panels for balanced power, supporting 45W wired fast charging — though wireless charging specs remain standard for Samsung foldables.

Camera capabilities emphasize versatility on the large canvas. The rear setup includes a 200-megapixel main sensor for exceptional detail, a 12-megapixel ultrawide and a 10-megapixel telephoto lens. Dual 10-megapixel front cameras (one on the cover, one under-display on the inner screen) handle selfies and video calls. Galaxy AI integration shines here, with features like Photo Assist, Generative Edit and Sketch to Image enabling advanced editing directly on the expansive display.

The TriFold runs Android 16 with One UI 8, incorporating the latest Galaxy AI enhancements for productivity — from note-taking and translation to creative tools optimized for the big screen. Durability improvements include reinforced hinges tested for longevity, though early adopters have reported isolated display issues, prompting Samsung to handle cases individually without widespread replacements yet.

Reviews praise the engineering feat: slim at just 3.9mm unfolded at its thinnest point, it delivers flagship performance in a portable package. Hands-on impressions highlight the “wow” factor of the 10-inch screen for streaming, document editing and multitasking with up to three apps side-by-side. CNET’s ongoing review calls it a “multitasker’s dream” with an 8.3/10 score, noting it’s more tablet than phone when open but excels in niche use cases. Comparisons to rivals like Huawei’s Mate XT underscore Samsung’s refinements in hinge design and software optimization.

Yet the price draws scrutiny. At $2,899 — roughly $900 more than the Galaxy Z Fold7 — it’s Samsung’s priciest mainstream phone, outpacing even fully loaded iPhone 17 Pro Max models. Limited color options and stock exacerbate perceptions of exclusivity over accessibility. Analysts suggest Samsung targets high-end enthusiasts, professionals and early adopters willing to pay for innovation, with global units potentially around 300,000 total.

Social buzz remains fervent, with unboxings and comparisons flooding platforms. Demand outstrips supply, leading to quick sell-outs and website glitches during restocks. Samsung Experience Stores offer in-person demos, allowing hands-on testing before purchase.
As foldables evolve, the Galaxy Z TriFold sets a benchmark for multi-screen mobility, blending phone convenience with tablet immersion. Whether it heralds a new category or remains a halo product depends on future iterations — rumors already swirl about a TriFold 2 potentially arriving in late 2026 with refinements.

For now, securing one requires vigilance: monitor Samsung.com for restocks, as February 20’s window may fill fast. The future of folding has unfolded — quite literally — and it’s bigger, bolder and pricier than ever.

The Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Department has started distributing extra flood relief payments to households impacted by recent flooding. This initiative aims to provide financial support to those affected, helping them recover from the damages and loss experienced.

The efforts underscore the government’s commitment to aid and improve the resilience of communities facing such disasters.

In response to the escalating flood crisis, the national disaster agency has announced the allocation of additional relief funds to 140,000 households severely impacted by the recent floods. This move underscores the agency’s commitment to providing immediate support and addressing the urgent needs of affected families. The financial aid aims to assist in securing essential supplies, such as food, clean water, and medical care, to help communities rebuild and recover.

The decision to transfer extra funds follows comprehensive assessments conducted by field teams, highlighting the extensive damages and the necessity for increased assistance. The agency is working collaboratively with local governments and humanitarian organizations to ensure the funds reach those most in need swiftly and efficiently. This coordination is pivotal in preventing delays and maximizing the impact of the relief efforts.

As the floodwaters continue to pose challenges, the disaster agency remains vigilant in monitoring the situation and adapting its strategies accordingly. The focus on timely and targeted financial aid exemplifies a proactive approach to disaster management. Community leaders have praised the initiative, emphasizing the significant relief it provides to thousands grappling with the aftermath of the floods, fostering hope and resilience in rebuilding their lives.

source

Other People are Reading

The Supreme Court ruling that struck down the Trump administration’s tariffs imposed under an economic emergency declaration could open the door to billions of dollars in tariff refunds for businesses, though the ruling didn’t specify a process for handling those refunds.

The Supreme Court ruled that President Donald Trump’s tariffs enacted under the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA) were illegal because the underlying law doesn’t authorize the president to impose tariffs.

Striking down the tariffs sends the issue back to the lower courts, which could weigh in on the refund process. However, businesses are already able to file “post-summary corrections” with Customs and Border Protection (CBP), which collects tariffs for the Department of Homeland Security that are remitted to the Treasury Department, while the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) has authority over appeals.

Mike Snarr, partner at BakerHostetler and co-leader of the firm’s International Trade team, told FOX Business, “Although today’s Supreme Court opinion did not address the refund issue directly, in most cases, companies should pursue refunds through the U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s administrative processes.

WILL REFUNDS BE ISSUED AFTER SUPREME COURT RULING ON TRUMP TARIFFS?

The Supreme Court’s ruling didn’t outline a tariff refund process, though there are existing options for businesses that paid the tariffs. (Qian Weizhong/VCG via Getty Images)

“For entries made within the last 10 months, importers may ask customs brokers to correct the customs declarations for refunds of recently paid IEEPA tariffs. For older entries, importers should file protests within the statutory deadlines,” Snarr added. 

“If protests are denied, importers should seek judicial review in the U.S. Court of International Trade seeking reliquidation. The CIT has expressly confirmed it has the authority to liquidate under these circumstances.”

The process of submitting and evaluating appeals for tariff refunds could prove challenging for businesses as well as the entities handling the claims and appeals due to the sheer volume of IEEPA tariffs collected from a multitude of firms since they were imposed last year.

Estimates for the amount of tariffs collected under IEEPA that are subject to possible refunds top $150 billion. The nonpartisan Tax Foundation put the figure at about $150 billion, while the Penn-Wharton Budget Model’s estimate was $175 billion. An analysis by JPMorgan suggested a range of $150 billion to $200 billion.

SUPREME COURT DEALS BLOW TO TRUMP’S TRADE AGENDA IN LANDMARK TARIFF CASE

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said last month that Treasury has the funds to pay tariff refunds if needed, though it may prove a lengthy process. (Fabrice Coffrini/AFP via Getty Images)

Chris Desmond, a partner in PwC’s Customs and International Trade practice, said, “Beyond the legal implications, the real challenge now is operational,” adding companies will need to “rapidly model which IEEPA tariffs may be refundable and quantify their opportunity because any refund process is likely to be highly congested.

“Customs brokers will be under significant strain, with limited capacity to manage a surge of post-summary corrections and protests across thousands of importers,” he explained. “Even where tariff refunds may be available, many companies will face internal capacity constraints. Customs and trade compliance teams are already stretched managing day-to-day filings, enforcement activity and ongoing tariff changes.”

Desmond said that, given the demands of undergoing detailed entry reviews, coordination with brokers and tight procedural deadlines, companies that “underestimate this workload risk timing delays to their financials while creating potential compliance issues if they request refunds on the wrong tariff lines.”

Tim Brightbill, co-chair of Wiley International Trade Practice Group, noted that “more than 1,000 lawsuits have already been filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade in an effort to secure tariff refunds in the event of a Supreme Court decision against the IEEPA tariffs.”

KEVIN HASSETT SAYS FED ECONOMISTS SHOULD BE ‘DISCIPLINED’ OVER TARIFF STUDY

President Donald Trump slammed the Supreme Court and said the issue of refunds may be litigated for years. (Kent Nishimura/Reuters)

Trump said at a press conference Friday that the Supreme Court’s ruling was “deeply disappointing” and criticized the high court for not addressing tariff refunds in the decision.

“I guess it has to get litigated for the next two years. So, they write this terrible defective decision, totally defective. It’s almost like not written by smart people. And what do they do, they don’t even talk about that,” Trump said.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent discussed potential tariff refunds in an interview with Reuters last month.

“It won’t be a problem if we have to do it, but I can tell you that if it happens — which I don’t think it’s going to — it’s just a corporate boondoggle,” Bessent said. “Costco, who’s suing the U.S. government, are they going to give the money back to their clients?”

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

Bessent added that the process for issuing tariff refunds could take a significant amount of time, saying, “We’re not talking about the money all goes out in a day. Probably over weeks, months, may take over a year, right?”