Panasonic has recalled one of its toaster ovens across the United States and Canada after the company found the appliance posed a risk of electric shock or fire.

The recall covers 11,480 Panasonic Model No. NB-G200 Electric Toaster Ovens sold in the U.S., as well as another 2,184 sold in Canada.

Pansonic said the power cord insulation “can be insufficient due to a protective fiberglass sleeve not covering it adequately, posing a risk of shock and/or fire hazard.”

HOME COOKS SHOULD STOP USING RECALLED GAS STOVES IMMEDIATELY, US SAYS

From October 2024 to April 2026, the toaster oven was sold for about $170 at Costco, on Amazon and through several other online retailers.

Consumers who believe they own the recalled toaster oven can verify the model number by checking the nameplate label on the back of the appliance.

Notices from both the U.S. government and Canada urge customers to immediately stop using the product and return it to Panasonic for a full refund.

CUISINART STAINLESS STEEL PROPANE GRILL SOLD AT LOWE’S, WALMART RECALLED OVER SHATTERING GLASS RISK

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission said it has received four consumer reports of the toaster oven tripping circuit breakers or outlets. A fifth report noted the toaster simply stopped working.

As of June 15, 2026, Panasonic said it had not received any reports of incidents or injuries in Canada related to the toaster.

Ticker	Security	Last	Change	Change %
AMZN	AMAZON.COM INC.	249.89	-5.07	-1.99%

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Panasonic, Costco and Amazon did not immediately respond to FOX Business’ requests for comment.

A ticking clock on Social Security solvency has prompted a bipartisan coalition of senators to introduce legislation aimed at preventing automatic, across-the-board benefit cuts for more than 70 million Americans.

Called the Protecting Retirement Opportunities and Maintaining Income Security for Everyone (PROMISE) Act, the bill establishes a procedural process designed to require congressional votes on a long-term Social Security solvency plan before the retirement trust fund’s projected depletion in 2032 triggers an automatic 22% reduction in monthly benefits. The legislation calls for an independent bipartisan advisory committee to develop recommendations intended to restore the program’s solvency for at least 50 years.

“Here is our chance to agree on a bipartisan process to rescue Social Security this year,” Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin, D-Ill, said in a press release. “Our bipartisan proposal opens Congress to debate this issue in a transparent, fair, and bipartisan way. We were elected to solve problems — and there’s no greater problem than the solvency and future of Social Security.”

“Millions of Americans rely on Social Security to live. In 6 years, those families will see a 22% cut to their benefits if Congress doesn’t act. Our plan starts the process of preserving promised benefits for current retirees and the next generation of Americans,” Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., said alongside Republican Sens. Thom Tillis, R-N.C.; John Cornyn R-Texas; and Alan Armstrong, R-Okla.

WHY RAMSEY FINANCIAL EXPERT SAYS THERE’S ‘NO MAGIC AGE’ TO CLAIM SOCIAL SECURITY

While multiple legislative proposals to secure Social Security’s trust funds have been introduced over the years, virtually none have advanced to a floor vote.

The PROMISE Act establishes a strict procedural timeline, requiring the Social Security Advisory Board (SSAB) to submit a proposal designed to restore Social Security solvency for at least 50 years. The bill also requires the House and Senate majority leaders to introduce the proposal, and if they fail to do so, any member of Congress may introduce it.

The proposal would then be referred to the House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Finance Committee. If the committees do not report it, the legislation would automatically be discharged to the House and Senate calendars for floor consideration.

Final passage would require a simple majority vote in the House and a three-fifths majority in the Senate.

“Social Security is on an unsustainable path that will lead to dramatic benefit cuts for retirees and growing skepticism among workers paying into a program on the brink of insolvency. With each passing year, the menu of options that preserve benefits and limit tax hikes narrows. The modest reforms Congress contemplated in 2010 would have put Social Security on solid footing for 75 years; today, those same reforms would add less than two years to our current runway,” Sen. Tillis said. “I won’t pretend there’s consensus on how we solve this, but the math is unforgiving: the longer Congress waits to act, the fewer good options remain.”

“For nearly a century, Social Security has been a lifeline that allows Americans to retire with dignity. Congress should not wait around until the last minute to shore up this critical program and prevent broad-based benefit cuts upon Trust Fund depletion,” Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., said in support of the bill. 

“That’s why I’m joining a bipartisan group of my colleagues in introducing legislation that will encourage Congress to roll up its sleeves and find a path forward to ensure current and future generations of retirees and their families are able to receive the benefits they have earned and which they are owed,” he continued.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget voiced support for the bill: “The PROMISE Act would establish a thoughtful bipartisan process to help Congress do its job and rescue Social Security before it’s too late… These proposals keep Congress and the public involved in this important process. Hopefully they can give our leaders the kick in the pants they need to start working together to secure Social Security for current and future generations,” Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget President Maya MacGuineas wrote.

Based on the current average monthly payout of $2,071, beneficiaries — including seniors and individuals with disabilities — would lose roughly $450 per month if a funding plan is not put in place. Experts estimate this reduction would force over 3 million American citizens into poverty.

READ MORE FROM FOX BUSINESS

In the past, how well a business was doing was mostly judged by how much people knew about it. A company bought ad space, showed its message to a large audience, and hoped that this would lead to more sales.

That model is still around, but many digital businesses now need something more direct. They need marketing that can be measured, tested, improved, and connected to revenue.

This is where performance marketing comes in. It looks at specific actions like clicks, leads, registrations, app installs, purchases, deposits, subscriptions, or repeat sales. Instead of asking only how many people saw an advert, the business asks what those people did next.

This approach can help startups, affiliate projects, SaaS companies, eCommerce brands, iGaming products, finance platforms, and mobile apps get better results from their marketing spend. It also helps teams see which channels deserve more budget and which ones should be paused before they become expensive.

It is rare for performance to improve just because of one campaign. It usually comes from tracking, testing, partner traffic, paid acquisition, conversion optimisation, and clear economics. Companies that work with partners like Riddick’s Partners often see performance marketing as more than just advertising. They see it as a way to connect traffic, offers and results that can be measured.

What Performance Marketing Means

Performance marketing is a way of doing marketing where the success of a campaign can be measured. A business can pay for impressions or clicks, but what they’re really interested in is usually something more in-depth, like the cost per lead, the cost per acquisition, the return on ad spend, the lifetime value, the conversion rate, and the retention rate.

This makes the channel useful for growth teams. They can test a campaign, read the data, adjust the funnel, and scale what works. The process is not always quick, but it is more controlled than guessing.

A strong performance strategy usually connects several areas, such as media buying, analytics, creative testing, landing pages, CRM, partner management and product data.

The Role of Data and Tracking

If you don’t track your marketing, it becomes just another kind of advertising. The business needs to know where each user came from, what they clicked on, what action they completed, and whether that action created value.

A proper setup may include UTM tags, pixels, postbacks, event tracking, CRM data, and revenue reports. Some businesses need more than one attempt to make a sale. A lead may look cheap but never buy. A customer who buys something for the first time might buy just the one time and never buy anything else. A traffic source might have fewer users, but these users might spend more money.

That is why growth teams should look beyond surface metrics. Clicks are important, but it’s more important to make money. Registrations are important, but activation and retention are important too.

Testing Creatives, Funnels, and Offers

Performance marketing also speeds up learning. Each campaign can test a small part of the growth system. A team may test:

• Different headlines and visuals;
• Landing page layouts;
• Short vs long forms;
• GEOs and languages;
• Device segments;
• Pricing messages;
• Traffic sources;
• Audience groups;
• Retargeting sequences.

This kind of testing helps businesses avoid making assumptions. Instead of saying “this market doesn’t work”, the team can see if the problem is the creative, the offer, the landing page, or the traffic source.

Better Budget Allocation

One of the best things about performance marketing is that it helps you to stick to your budget. Money is given to campaigns that show they can do a good job.

This doesn’t mean that every test will be profitable. Many tests fail. But a failed test can still be useful if it shows what not to scale. The real danger is not losing money on a controlled test. The real danger is to plan a campaign without understanding the numbers.

Businesses that manage performance well usually define limits before launch. These limits include target CPA, minimum conversion volume, acceptable ROAS, testing budget, and rules for pausing weak segments.

Performance Marketing and Partner Channels

Affiliate and partner channels are a great way to do performance marketing. They allow businesses to work with external traffic sources while paying for actions that can be measured or performance goals that have been agreed upon.

This can help companies enter new markets faster. A partner might already understand a GEO, audience, or vertical that the business has not tested yet. But there are too many people coming to the site. The company should track quality, approve traffic sources, validate conversions, and compare long-term value by partner.

If you manage them well, partner channels can help you to attract more customers without costing you more.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Performance marketing can help a business grow faster, but only if it is managed carefully. Here are some common mistakes to avoid:

• Launching without tracking;
• Judging campaigns only by clicks;
• Changing settings too often;
• Testing too many variables at once;
• Scaling before the funnel is stable.

Another mistake is ignoring retention. If a campaign brings in cheap users who don’t stick around, it might seem like your growth is good for a week, but then it’ll disappear. Strong teams look at how people behave when they first see the advert and afterwards.

Conclusion

Performance marketing helps businesses grow faster because it connects the money spent on marketing with results that can be measured. It lets teams test offers, compare channels, control budgets, and grow based on facts instead of guesses.

You’ll get the best results when you think about performance marketing as a way to help your business grow. All the different parts of a website, like the traffic, creatives, landing pages, tracking, partners, and retention, need to work well together. When they do, businesses can move faster, spend their money more wisely, and build growth that is easier to repeat.

Meghan Markle made her first trip back to the United Kingdom in four years earlier this month, reuniting privately with King Charles III at his Gloucestershire estate alongside Prince Harry and their two children, marking one of the more significant developments in the family’s relationship with the royal household since the couple stepped back from royal duties in 2020.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, along with their children, Prince Archie, 7, and Princess Lilibet, 5, met with King Charles and Queen Camilla on Friday, July 10, at Highgrove House, the king’s private country residence in Gloucestershire, west of London. Buckingham Palace confirmed the meeting took place but described it strictly as a private family occasion, saying no photographs or additional details would be released from the visit.

The gathering marked the first time King Charles had seen his grandchildren in person in more than four years. Harry and Meghan had not been in the United Kingdom together since 2022, when they returned for the funeral of Queen Elizabeth II. In the years since, Harry has made several brief solo trips back to Britain, including for his grandmother’s funeral and his father’s coronation in 2023, along with a private tea with the king at Clarence House last September. Friday’s Highgrove meeting, however, represented the first confirmed occasion the full Sussex family had spent time together with the monarch since the couple relocated to Montecito, California.

According to reporting from the U.K.’s PA news agency, the family flew in from an unspecified European destination ahead of the visit, with plans having shifted in the days leading up to the reunion. Meghan had initially been expected to join Harry publicly at an Invictus Games countdown event earlier in the week, but those plans changed, and the family instead prioritized the private gathering at Highgrove. The Sussex family was believed to be staying at Althorp House in West Northamptonshire during their visit, the childhood home of Harry’s late mother, Princess Diana, and the site of her grave, according to reporting from The Mirror.

Notably, Prince William and his family were absent from the Highgrove gathering. According to the BBC, William was taking part in a charity polo match in Windsor at the same time his brother’s family was meeting with the king. There have been no reports indicating any plans for Harry and William to meet during this particular visit, and the relationship between the two brothers has remained visibly strained in the years since Harry and Meghan’s departure from royal life.

The visit came against the backdrop of the upcoming Invictus Games, the international sporting event for wounded, injured and sick service members and veterans that Harry founded in 2014. The Duke of Sussex traveled to London the week prior for a series of charity engagements, including an appearance at Chatham House on July 7 for a conversation on Invictus Games policy, part of the broader “One Year to Go” celebrations ahead of the Invictus Games Birmingham 2027. Reports had circulated for weeks beforehand about whether Meghan and the children might accompany Harry on this trip, with The Telegraph first reporting on July 9 that the Duchess would be traveling to Britain alongside her husband and children.

Security arrangements have remained one of the central complicating factors in any Sussex return to the UK. Harry has previously said it would be “impossible” to bring Meghan and their children to Britain without adequate security protection, a matter that has been the subject of an extended legal and administrative review in recent years. Some royal and security officials were reported to feel a degree of unease ahead of the visit, given ongoing questions about how any public backlash might be managed alongside the practical logistics of protecting the family during their time in the country.

Buckingham Palace has given no indication whether the Highgrove meeting signals the start of broader reconciliation efforts between the Sussexes and other senior royals, characterizing the visit solely as a private family occasion. Questions remain about whether and when Harry might next meet with William, even as the meeting with King Charles was widely viewed by royal commentators as a meaningful step following years of limited contact.

Beyond the royal reunion, Meghan has continued to maintain a public presence through her business and entertainment ventures in the weeks surrounding the UK trip. She is set to appear as a guest judge on MasterChef Australia later this month, with Endemol Shine Australia and Channel 10 confirming she will feature in the show’s July 26 episode. As a guest judge, Meghan will reportedly ask contestants to prepare a dish tied to a personal story, continuing her recent pattern of blending television appearances with themes connected to food and lifestyle content, an area she has increasingly built out through her Netflix series “With Love, Meghan” and her As Ever lifestyle brand.

Meghan’s broader business ventures have also drawn attention in recent months. Her As Ever brand, which sells items including fruit spreads, herbal teas and home goods, reportedly generated significant sales momentum earlier this year, with a website glitch at one point allowing customers to calculate approximate sales figures for the brand’s signature fruit spread. Royal commentators have pointed to that commercial momentum, along with her growing entertainment profile, as context for how Meghan may be approaching any potential return to a more visible public role in the UK going forward.

For now, the Sussex family’s exact plans beyond the Highgrove visit and Meghan’s upcoming MasterChef Australia appearance remain unclear. With the Invictus Games Birmingham set to take place in 2027, royal watchers expect the family’s ties to the UK, and the broader question of their relationship with senior royals, to remain a closely watched storyline in the months ahead, particularly as preparations for the games continue to bring Harry back to Britain on a more regular basis.

Just one in six of Britain’s small businesses expects to grow over the next 12 months, the lowest proportion since records began in 2014, while nearly one in three anticipate shrinking, selling up or closing their doors for good.

The findings, from the Federation of Small Businesses’ quarterly Small Business Index, lay bare the scale of the challenge facing Andy Burnham as he prepares to enter Downing Street on Monday. The lobby group warned the incoming prime minister faces a “huge test” to turn the economy around.

The gap between firms predicting growth and those predicting shrinkage, a sale or closure is now the widest the FSB has recorded. The net balance first turned negative a year ago and has stayed below zero ever since.

For the owners behind the numbers, the culprits are familiar. The survey of 1,113 small business owners and sole traders, conducted in June, found the state of the UK economy, taxes and labour costs were expected to act as the biggest drags on growth over the coming year.

Tina McKenzie, the FSB’s policy chairwoman, said: “We cannot and must not accept a ‘new normal’ where more small firms believe they will shrink, sell up, or close entirely than anticipate growing over the next year. Small firms are the only engine of growth present in each and every postcode and we need them firing on all cylinders.”

The timing hands Burnham an immediate in-tray item. McKenzie said she hoped he would honour his pledge to expand small business rates relief, a live issue for the 104,000 small firms swept into the rates net when April’s revaluation collided with a decade-long threshold freeze.

“The new prime minister’s first budget will be a huge early test of whether he can put small businesses first, drive down costs, and drive up growth, opportunity and jobs, but what is crucial is that this is complemented by every department finally putting growth first and pulling in the same direction,” she said.

The trading picture behind the gloom is stark. Only one in five small companies reported higher takings in the second quarter, significantly outnumbered by the more than half who saw revenues fall.

Costs, meanwhile, keep climbing. Close to nine in ten respondents reported higher running costs than a year earlier, up slightly on the first quarter, with taxation the most-cited reason for the increase.

McKenzie also urged ministers not to let the late payment crackdown now before parliament slip down the agenda, saying the legislation, billed by the government as the largest crackdown on late payments in more than 25 years, “must be prioritised”.

She said she hoped Burnham’s government would recognise that small businesses “suffer just as much as everyone else when a ‘Whitehall knows best’ culture fails to listen to the people delivering growth on the ground”.

For SME owners, the message to the new administration is simple enough: the sector that employs millions across every postcode in Britain is running out of road, and the first budget will show whether anyone in Whitehall is listening.

---

JW Lees breaks £100m turnover mark and continues pub investment

The boss of family pub and brewing group JW Lees says his company has enjoyed a record year despite “little or no useful support from Government” – and says incoming prime minister Andy Burnham must give more support to the hospitality sector.

Managing director William Lees-Jones has announced that JW Lees saw revenues of £105.6m for the year to March 31 – up 5.7% on 2025. That drove pre-tax profit to £8.8m, up on last year’s figure of £7.1m, with EBITDA earnings of £12.3m.

JW Lees operates 138 pubs and is based at its historic brewery home in Middleton. Over the year, the group saw JW Lees core draught beer sales rise 3.7% – with sales boosted by the relaunch of Boddingtons Cask Bitter, which Lees brews under licence from Budweiser.

The group invested more than £10m in its pub and hotel estate over the year, with more than 20 major refurbishments. Since the end of the year JW Lees has bought two new pubs – The Royal Oak in Glossop and the Bull’s Head in Poynton – and is investing in them before reopening them in coming weeks.

JW Lees has also announced that it will bring together its Managed Pubs and Inns & Hotels divisions in April 2027 under the leadership of Chris Moulson as director of operations. Meanwhile Gary Stafford has become director of operations – pub partners and Lee Reeves has become director of people, with both joining the group management board from October.

JW Lees is run by the sixth generation of its founding family. William Lees-Jones has long spoken out for the interests of family businesses, and has led the charge against recent inheritance tax changes.

Earlier this year, he told BusinessLive those changes were an “act of self harm ” that will stop family firms growing. He said: “JW Lees will survive, because we’ll do whatever it takes, but in the short term it means less investment, less job creation, more short-term survival tactics. And that for me is an act of self-harm by a British government at a time when the government was elected on the principle of growth.”

Announcing the latest results, Mr Lees-Jones said: “It’s fantastic for JW Lees to report a record year both in terms of turnover and profitability. The long hot summer of 2025 was a great way to start the year and our teams pulled together to drive higher productivity at JW Lees to new levels.

“Brewing and hospitality are tough sectors right now and we continue to be impacted by above-inflation rises in labour rates, high business rates and little or no useful support from Government. We hope that Andy Burnham can change all that, with more favourable policies to help the hospitality sector which will also create new jobs.

“For family businesses like JW Lees the changes that Rachel Reeves brought in to change Business Property Relief (BPR) have made things even tougher since we are now having to plan for higher levels of inheritance tax for our family shareholders and this will inevitably lead to reduced investment in the business.

“At a time when the UK economy desperately needs growth it seems unfair that the Government has handed competitive advantage to overseas companies and private equity who are not exposed to these costs and this negatively impacts UK family businesses’ ability to invest with family businesses making up more than 50% of all UK private sector jobs.

“JW Lees will do whatever it takes to remain a family company as we approach our 200th anniversary in 2028.”

MakeMyTrip’s India unit has filed confidential papers with market regulator Sebi for a proposed initial public offering on Indian stock exchanges. The company said its wholly owned subsidiary, MakeMyTrip (India) Ltd, has submitted the confidential filing with Sebi, BSE and NSE for a proposed listing on the main board.

The IPO is expected to involve a sale of equity shares in MakeMyTrip India by MakeMyTrip and its wholly owned subsidiary, ibibo Group Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd. The Gurugram-headquartered travel company disclosed the plan in a regulatory filing with Nasdaq.

After the proposed IPO, MakeMyTrip India will continue to remain a subsidiary of MakeMyTrip. Its financial results will also continue to be consolidated with those of the parent company.

The company said proceeds received by MakeMyTrip and ibibo Holdings from the sale of shares in MakeMyTrip India will strengthen MakeMyTrip’s cash position. The funds are expected to be used for long-term growth, strategic inorganic initiatives and repurchases of different classes of securities, including convertible securities.

Also read: SBI Funds Management IPO allotment likely today; GMP signals 17% listing premium. Here’s how to check status

MakeMyTrip said it continues to see strong long-term travel demand in India. It said demand is being supported by a growing middle class, rising spending on travel, higher digital adoption and low penetration of organised travel services.
The company also pointed to its scale in the Indian travel market. It has more than 87 million lifetime transacted retail customers and over 77,000 SME and large corporate customers. It also said its app has seen more than 549 million downloads.MakeMyTrip said it has sold more than 32.5 million hotel room nights under its hotels and packages business and more than 104.6 million bus tickets.

The IPO filing comes at a time when India’s travel and tourism market has seen a strong recovery after the pandemic, helped by higher domestic travel, premium leisure demand, business travel and greater use of online booking platforms.

A listing of MakeMyTrip India would give domestic investors a chance to invest directly in one of the country’s largest online travel platforms. The timing, size and other details of the IPO will be known after the regulatory process moves ahead.

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)

The social care system in England – which is delivered mainly by independent providers rather than the NHS – is widely perceived as underfunded and unfair.

Public funding is means tested and it is estimated, external that there are two million older people in England now living with some unmet need for social care.

And around 10% of people aged 65 and over face lifetime care costs above £100,000 for their care.

Burnham has himself described it as a “broken” system., external

And , externalhe made an attempt to reform it, external when he was health secretary in Gordon Brown’s cabinet, though his plan was abandoned after Labour lost the 2010 election.

A government-commissioned report by the economist Andrew Dilnot in 2011, external proposed a state-funded cap on lifetime care costs, of around £35,000, meaning no one would be required to pay more than that to fund their own care.

The principle of a state-funded cap was accepted by Conservative ministers, but the Dilnot system was never implemented.

Former Prime Minister Theresa May put a separate plan for a new system of social care support into the 2017 Tory manifesto, which proposed including the value of a person’s home in the means test for care received in an individual’s home – and did not initially mention a cap on lifetime contributions.

This proved controversial because homeowners could have been required to contribute more towards their care costs, external based on the value of their property.

But the former PM was forced to reverse course within days and the proposal was blamed for the loss of the Tory majority in that election.

Labour’s 2024 manifesto, external pledged a new “national care service”.

But Starmer kicked the reform can down the road when he became PM and commissioned Baroness Casey to produce a review on options for reform, external, instructing her to deliver her final report by 2028.

Burnham has suggested he will ask Baroness Casey to report back sooner – by the end of 2026 – and could choose to implement her recommendations.

But any reform is likely to cost money, likely billions of pounds a year.

In the past, Burnham has suggested changing inheritance tax to pay for social care reform, external, floating the idea of a 10% levy on all estates.

However, polling frequently suggests inheritance tax is widely regarded as the least fair tax, external. It should be said more recently he has said he is open to getting rid of inheritance tax completely, external and instead moving to tax “the wealthy properly while they are alive”.